OS X firewall blocks iTMS

I've spent about two hours trying to figure out why OS X personal firewall blocks the Music Store, with no luck. Unless the firewall is turned off, the other computers (all Macs) on the network cannot log in. The sympton is the "Accessing the store" and eventually timing out.
There are a lot of Windows-specific posts about firewall problems, but none that I could find about the Mac firewall.

I have an additional Ethernet card in my Mac, and share the Internet access via that card. The built in port is connected to a cable modem.
The Ethernet out (from the second card) goes to a sixteen port GigE switch, which lights up various ports around the house.
I don't use any wireless in the house.
Andrew

Similar Messages

  • 10.6 Server's Firewall Blocks It's Own Internet Connection

    I had this problem about two years ago when I was trying to run 10.6 on my home server (Mac mini) for the first time. Eventually I gave up, reverted the mini back to 10.5, and ram problem-free for years. When 10.7 came out, I tried to upgrade the mini to that. That didn't go well either, but mostly due to Lion missing many many features (suprise!). So I figured that 10.6's problems were fixed by now, and gave it another shot. It went fine and I've been running for about a month problem free (or so I thought). But now it's offline again. I finally found one other person on another forum that had the EXACT same problem as me. And reading this description, I realize that I have been having problems all long, I just assumed they were my ISP's problems, not my own.
    So here's what happens. The firewall in 10.6 server will "freak out". It will be running normally, then suddenly it will go haywire and block everything. And I mean everything. My computer won't even be able to get an IP via DHCP. Everything is blocked. But as soon as you stop the firewall, everything works normally. You can even modify the firewall rules, and set it up so there are NO deny rules, and EVERY connection to and from every host is set to allow. And the firewall still blocks everything. This is the same exact thing that happened 2 years ago when I first tried to run 10.6 Server on my mini. The difference is that back then, this would happen either immediatly, or within a day. This time around, with 10.6.8, it took about a month before suddenly, without any provocation, all internet connections stopped.
    I've had this happen on multiple computers. I don't do anything special, I just set up a basic firewall scheme where everything in the LAN range is allowed, and everything from "any" is allowed only to service ports I'm running. The basic gateway setup. Now I was running 10.6 Server on my laptop (for netbooting) and it would do the same thing. But because my laptop wasn't acting as a gateway, I could just turn the firewall off (you need the firewall for NAT). My mini server IS acting as a gateway, as was another mini I set up for a client of mine (that eventualy I changed over so they were running off an airport, and the mini server was just a client. But I don't want that setup at home, I want my mini to be the router).
    I have verizon Fios internet. 25/25, it's great. The ONT is in my basement, and it's plugged into the same fused outlet as our freezer. From time to time, when the power goes out, it trips that breaker and the outlet goes dead. My itnernet is gone and I have to go reset the outlet. Once I do, my mini won't get an IP from Verizon until I reboot the mini. Not once. Not twice. Usually 5-10 reboots, and suddenly it will get an IP. I always assumed this was a verizon problem. Until I read someone else's post about this same problem. Turns out, that's the firewall blocking DHCP again! If you turn the firewall off, you don't have to keep rebooting, it will grab an IP right away.
    At least I'm not crazy! So what is going on here? Does anyone have any idea what is going on with my firewall, or how I can fix it?
    Lastly, after 4.5 hours of complete inability to get an internet connection with the firewall on, it just started working again. I now have fully functional, normal internet. I find it hard to believe 10.6 has a firewall that is simply broken. I find it even harder to believe I'm imagining things, or that I've had fluke after fluke. Something is going on with 10.6 Server.

    The DNS skapegoat just doesn't make sense.
    Why would "improper" DNS cause OS X's firewall to block all network connections? Even the server's ability to make it's own DHCP connection?
    As far as a router, I don't want to use a cheap unreliable residential router. I have a home file server that, aside from running 10.6, makes a super reliable router. And port mapping aside, OS X Server's DHCP server is great to use. Rock solid. It makes no sense to run a cheap residential router when I have a home server. Then every 6-18 months, I get to deal with that router slowly failing, as my internet connection gets slower and slower. No thanks.
    So back to this firewall issue. I've talked to Apple aobut this before, and they give the same generic "DNS has to be right" answer to basically every problem I've ever had with 10.6 Server (hinting at endless CalDAV problems). But no one has every explained what that specifically means, or how something like wrong DNS (whatever that even means) can cause the firewall to block everything. This just makes no sense to me. And this especially does not explain why, after 10 reboots or so, everything just magically starts running normally.
    I just had an incedent today where I woke up to no internet. I rebooted 3 times. Each time, I either got a self-assigned IP address, or the ethernet interface would toggled between "unplugged" and "no-ip". I could turn the firewall off and the server would INSTANTLY start functioning normally. I'd happily run without a firewall, and just turn all services I'm not using off. However NAT needs the firewall, so without the firewall, the Server is the only Mac on the network that has an internet connection. So I kept rebooting and rebooting, and I think about 8 reboots later, like magic, the server came up, grabbed an IP, and everything started working normally.
    Also my IP through my ISP is dynamic, and that isn't going to change. So yes, I am trying to use OS X Server as my router on a dynamic internet connection. I've been doing this since the days of Mac OS X Server 10.1. Only 10.6 has had any problems at all.
    So really, "10.6 is more picky about DNS" isn't an answer to this problem. Or, at least, it's not a sufficient answer. I need much more information than that.

  • Firewall blocks web sharing

    2 computers, laptop with Snow Leopard, large web site in ~/Sites/htdocs, with .shtml files and an SSI file to add text common to all .shtml files. I'd like to see this on the desktop computer as it appears to others , but Firewall blocks web sharing on laptop. How do I  fix Firewall?

    System Preferences>Sharing.  Is File Sharing selected? 

  • Firewall blocking video chat connection

    I tried to video chat with my wife today from work on my PlayBook. Got a message about a firewall blocking it when it tried to connect us. It gave no further info so it's kind of hard for me to figure out whether this is my work wifi or my own router at home causing this.
    Where can I find more info on this?
    Staff UI Prototyper (read: full-time hacker)
    My BB10 apps: Screamager | Scientific RPN Calculator | The Last Weather App

    Hello TheMarco,
    Do you know if porting forwarding has been enabled for the firewall settings?
    -HMthePirate
    Come follow your BlackBerry Technical Team on twitter! @BlackBerryHelp
    Be sure to click Kudos! for those who have helped you.Click Solution? for posts that have solved your issue(s)!

  • Firewall blocks DHCP after Logic Board Change

    I had my computer in repair and they changed the logic board. Since then "Set access to specific services" setting misbehaves and blocks DHCP configuration.
    After the repair it asked me to allow incoming connections for configd. I denied because I did not know it.
    Problem: configd is not listed in Preferences so it cannot be unblocked!!!
    How can I completely reset the rules table and start over?
    Firewall[41]: Deny configd data in from 10.37.129.1:67 uid = 0 proto=17
    Firewall[41]: Deny mDNSResponder data in from 169.254.203.40:5353 uid = 0 proto=17

    I give up. This is a horrible issue. Now, the Firewall blocks internet access to configd and mDNSResponder after wakeup from suspend despite being on the "Allow all incoming" list of the System Preferences panel.
    The firewall has become useless.
    Jul 17 14:22:13 garfield2 Firewall[42]: Deny configd data in from 10.37.129.1:67 uid = 0 proto=17
    Jul 17 14:22:15 garfield2 Firewall[42]: Deny configd data in from 10.211.55.1:67 uid = 0 proto=17
    Jul 17 14:22:22 garfield2 Firewall[42]: Deny configd data in from 10.37.129.1:67 uid = 0 proto=17
    Jul 17 14:22:24 garfield2 Firewall[42]: Deny configd data in from 10.211.55.1:67 uid = 0 proto=17
    Jul 17 14:22:30 garfield2 Firewall[42]: Deny configd data in from 10.37.129.1:67 uid = 0 proto=17
    Jul 20 09:18:58 garfield2 Firewall[42]: Deny mDNSResponder data in from fe80::21b:63ff:fe9b:37d4:5353 uid = 0 proto=17
    Jul 20 09:18:58 garfield2 Firewall[42]: Deny mDNSResponder data in from fe80::21c:42ff:fe00:0:5353 uid = 0 proto=17
    Jul 20 09:18:58 garfield2 Firewall[42]: Deny mDNSResponder data in from fe80::21c:42ff:fe00:1:5353 uid = 0 proto=17
    Jul 20 09:18:58 garfield2 Firewall[42]: Deny mDNSResponder data in from fe80::21b:63ff:fe9b:37d4:5353 uid = 0 proto=17

  • Firewall blocks afp even though enabled!?

    This relates to a G5 running 10.4.11 and a mac pro running 10.5.5
    We are having a nightmare with file sharing between two machines. We can connect fine from the mac pro to the g5 via a ethernet router. We can't however connect from the g5 -we can however connect to the internet and pinging the mac pro works. We have tried connecting with the bonjour adress and the ip addres - no results. The personal file sharing tabs in system preferences on both machines are ticked. The firewall is set to allow essential services, and below are listed printer sharing, file sharing etc. However i opened the log and saw that a few afp connections had just been denied - turn the firewall off and we can connect to the macpro. Surely we should be able to connect on a local area network without the firewall blocking it? It also denies cupsd (we have a printer networked to the g5) but also less frequently nmbd, which seems weird as to my limited knowledge this is to do with windows file sharing - and we do not have a windows machine on the network.
    Weirdly I enabled the firewalls on both machines fairly recently after noticing they were off - however my client (i am a retoucher) has confirmed that filesharing was always like this - even when firewall off which I seem to recollect as correct. In theory if we have a router with firewall enabled do we need the firewall on on the macs?
    Please help I have reached the limit of my knowledge on this one! Many thanks

    On the MacPro > System Preferences > Sharing > File Sharing, is the list of shared folders what you expect and for each shared folder, are the authorized users and permissions set up as you would expect? Clicking on the options button underneath that panel, is AFP checked, and if desired or necessary, SMB and/or FTP?
    In theory, I would say yes, if you have full faith in the personal integrity of all the local users on the LAN, and you believe them to be cautious enough that they won't have inadvertently downloaded and installed some sort of malware onto their machines, and you believe that your LAN is adequately secured (e.g., using WPA2 for the WLAN), then it is true, you should only need to maintain the firewall at the internet-facing router.

  • Firewall blocks Airplay (even under 'allow all traffic')

    Hi every body,
    I am somewhat at the end of my knowledge. I have a mac mini server running Lion 10.7.2 server. Interestingly, my the server's firewall blocks
    a) all airplay traffic and
    b) 'reading Airport confirguration' requests
    even when the firewall is set to 'allow all traffic'. However, when I completely switch it off, everything works just fine.
    Any help would really be appreciated.
    Thanks a lot.
    Nonresidentalien
    P.S. I have also tried to open ports 80 (t), 443(t), 554 (t/u), 3689(t), 5297(t), 5289(t/u), 5353(u), 49159(u) and 49163(u) with no success

    Pointing to the IPv6 thread was a good idea. After reading it, I found out that the firewall preferences in Server Admin only show you IPv4 related firewall rules.
    There is a terminal command that allows you to play with IPv6 rules. And by doing so, I was actually able to get AirPlay working again.
    First, you want to show you the current IPv6 firewall rules. In my case they looked like this (10.7.2):
    reptilehouse:~ sascha$ sudo ip6fw show
    01000        285      96163 allow ipv6 from any to any via lo0
    01100         66       5750 allow ipv6 from any to ff02::/16
    65000          0          0 deny ipv6 from any to any
    65535          6        306 allow ipv6 from any to any
    As you can see, rule number 01100 only allows traffic to the local subnet, while the next rule (65000) blocks anything else. So you want to get rid of 65000:
    reptilehouse:~ sascha$ sudo ip6fw delete 65000
    To confirm, show the rule table again and you should see 65000 is gone:
    reptilehouse:~ sascha$ sudo ip6fw show
    01000        285      96163 allow ipv6 from any to any via lo0
    01100         66       5750 allow ipv6 from any to ff02::/16
    65535          6        306 allow ipv6 from any to any
    Mind you, the rule numbers could be different on your system and you could see more or less rules. But you get the idea.
    What I don't know if whether this is sticky, e.g. survives a reboot.

  • Firewall blocking access to app store

    Anyone know how to circumvent a firewall blocking app store access (same for itunes) - I can confirm access  when on a different network.

    found http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1629 which give port number etc for itunes - which I assume as the same for app store

  • Firewall blocking access to Hyper-V Virtual Machine. Please hep!

    Hi there, I hope this is the right spot for this. Allow me to explain the setup we have. We have a server with Hyper-V installed and a VC made for a DC  for a small domain we have.  I was able to remote into the new DC, and our exchange server
    was picking it up as a DC. So far so good.....
    Now, here's where we seem to have a problem. We Installed 'Symantec Endpoint Protection' As we have this on a few servers, we had a set of settings for servers. (I didn't set this part up) Now. the problem we are having is that it seems the end point protection
     on the Hyper-C  Host is blocking connections from Exchange/other computers (access shared folders and logging in). What  can i do to resolve this?  Connections seem to be fine, (Exchange will pick up the the DC, and i can access shared
    folders) when i  disable the firewall and network threat protection on the Hyper-V Host.  
    Our Exchange server is 2010
    We are using Server 08 R2
    Can someone please advise me on how i can get this resolved, so i don't have to leave the server with Hyper not behind a firewall or network threat protection. 

    Hi,
    I am Chetan Savade from Symantec Technical Support Team.
    There was a known issue between SEP and Hyper-V traffic. It's been resolved in the latest release of SEP. If not using the latest version upgrade to the latest version can be a possible solution.
    SEP 12.1 RU4 MP1a (12.1.4104.4130) is the latest verison. 
    HyperV traffic was blocked with Symantec Endpoint Protection Firewall enabled
    Fix ID: 3181006
    Symptom: The Symantec Endpoint Protection firewall blocks HyperV traffic.
    Solution: Modified the loopback packet processing in the Teefer driver.
    Reference: http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH216262 
    Best Regards,
    CHETAN

  • Cisco RV042 Firewall Blocking LAN Traffic

    Hello Everyone,
    I currently have an RV042G with a downstream SG-300 connected to one of the LAN interfaces.  Connected to the SG-300 are a couple servers running ESXi.  Intervlan routing is working fine on the current setup; however, I only able to connect to my ESXi hosts on a separate VLAN for approximately a minute before the connection is dropped.  I have concluded that the firewall seems to be culprit in blocking my traffic.  If I turn the firewall off, everything acts as expected.  There is a default "ANY/ANY" rule for LAN traffic enabled and I have added a couple extras allowing all traffic for IP ranges, but I still seem to be losing my connections.  To make matters more confusing, I can see ACCESS_RULE events in the firewall logs permitting the traffic (or so I'm interpretting).
    Regardless, here's how my rules currently stand below.  I put another ANY/ANY rule in because the default didn't seem to be working -- I immediately was able to ping other hosts on different VLANs after adding the rule.  I was under the assumption allowing all traffic from any source to any destination would make the LAN pretty accessible.  I would appreciate any guidance or resources on this topic to set up some quick firewall rules to get things up and running.  Thanks in advance.
    Priority
    Enable
    Action
    Service
    Source
    Interface
    Source
    Destination
    Time
    Day
    Delete
    123
    Allow
    All Traffic [1]
    LAN
    10.10.21.1 ~ 10.10.21.31
    10.10.10.10 ~ 10.10.10.10
    Always
    123
    Allow
    All Traffic [1]
    LAN
    10.10.10.10 ~ 10.10.10.10
    10.10.21.1 ~ 10.10.21.31
    Always
    123
    Allow
    All Traffic [1]
    LAN
    Any
    Any
    Always
    Allow
    All Traffic [1]
    LAN
    Any
    Any
    Always
    Deny
    All Traffic [1]
    WAN1
    Any
    Any
    Always
    Deny
    All Traffic [1]
    WAN2
    Any
    Any
    Always

    I guess I should clarify, the SG-300 is running in Layer 3 mode, and the VLANs are defined on it; however, the static routes are defined on the RV042.  Maybe there's a more efficient way of doing this? 
    Below is a scrubbed copy of my switch configuration. 
    config-file-header
    SWITCH01
    v1.3.5.58 / R750_NIK_1_35_647_358
    CLI v1.0
    set system mode router
    vlan database
    vlan 2
    exit
    no bonjour enable
    hostname SWITCH01
    no logging console
    ip ssh server
    ip ssh password-auth
    clock timezone CEST +1
    interface vlan 1
    ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
    no ip address dhcp
    interface vlan 2
    name VIRTUAL-MANAGEMENT
    ip address 10.10.21.1 255.255.255.224
    interface gigabitethernet1
    description ESXI01:VMNIC0:MGMT
    switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2
    interface gigabitethernet20
    description UPLINK
    exit
    ip route 0.0.0.0 /0 10.10.10.1 metric 15
    The routes I have defined is:
    Destination IP
    Subnet Mask
    Default Gateway
    Hop Count
    Interface
    10.10.21.0
    255.255.255.224
    10.10.10.2
    1
    eth0
    10.10.10.0
    255.255.255.0
    0
    eth0
    255.255.252.0
    0
    eth1
    239.0.0.0
    255.0.0.0
    0
    eth0
    default
    0.0.0.0
    40
    eth1
    Just to reiterate the problem, I am able to connect to hosts on VLAN 2 from my computer on VLAN 1, but I am disconnected a minute or so later.  When the firewall is disabled, I have no issues with connecting to the host across VLANs and maintaining that connection.  Maybe I have a misconfiguration somewhere that is causing some issues?  I appreciate the help. 

  • Firewall blocks Apple's Network Time Protocol

    Hi,
    I admit to not fully understanding everything about the Firewall on OS X server 10.4.11 and I'm hoping someone can help with a little(?) problem.
    On the WAN side, my "gateway" server is connected directly to my SpeedTouch 780 modem with a fixed IP address. On the LAN side are a couple of switches and then an Airport Extreme base station (192.168.2.249). This broadcasts wirelessly to a more distant Airport Express (192.168.2.247). Both WiFi devices are configured to obtain the time from Apple's European servers.
    After completing a Carbon Copy Cloner of my OS partition and rebooting on my usual volume I noticed the following denials in my Firewall log:
    Dec 28 12:50:16 nl1 ipfw: 65534 Deny UDP 17.72.255.12:123 192.168.2.249:3987 in via en0
    Dec 28 12:40:25 nl1 ipfw: 65534 Deny UDP 17.72.255.12:123 192.168.2.247:3814 in via en0
    In SA --> Firewall --> Settings --> Services --> Edit Services for: 192.168.1-net (en0/modem connection)
    I have the "Allow only traffic for: 192.168.1-net on these ports" checked and
    NTP - Network Time Protocol UDP/TCP is also checked.
    Under, Edit Services for: any
    I have the "Allow only traffic for: any" checked and
    NTP - Network Time Protocol UDP/TCP is also checked.
    Under, Edit Services for: 192.168.2-net (en1/LAN)
    I have the "Allow all traffic for: 192.168.2-net" checked.
    1) Why is this traffic being blocked?
    2) Why does the port number seem to get changed in transit? (I've got NAT running and Open Directory).
    3) Does the configuration under, "Allow only traffic for: any" overrule all other Firewall settings? So if for example a port under, "Allow only traffic for: 192.168.1-net on these ports" wasn't checked but was under, "Allow only traffic for: any", would the traffic be allowed through?
    Thanks and happy new year!
    Michael Franks

    Do you have NTP activated? Does it work? If it doesn't and you have the firewall activated, then open the required port. If it is working then don't worry about it.

  • Firefox "check for add-on updates" checks even when not selected, request website list for firewall blocking purposes

    I work for the Tech Department in a school district. Our student computers are locked down and all settings are reset after a restart. We have set firefox to always allow all add-ons to run and to never check for updates (we update them on a schedule we control). However, since the latest release, we have been prompted after EVERY flash AND EVERY java update that they are out of date and need to be updated. Having the students click on this every time for every affected webpage is no longer an option. We are also not interested in white-listing pages individually; instead, we would like to prevent firefox from finding the update server to prevent any further prompts.
    Please provide me with all of the websites/web addresses that "check for add-on updates" uses so we can block them at the firewall level.
    Thanks

    Part of the problem may be the recent flurry of required updates to FlashPlayer. As I understand it Mozilla took the exceptional step of blocklisting some of those FlashPlayer versions after fixes were released because there were known exploits in the wild.
    * See the blocklist
    * And flashplayers bulletins https://helpx.adobe.com/security.html#flashplayer
    Possibly you are having difficulty in keeping the software updated and so seeing valid warnings from Firefox. You appear (System info aside) to be posting using Firefox 34. The current Release is Fx35.0.1
    Possibly it would be worth you considering using Firefox ESR, that still has regular updates including backported critical security fixes, but the major version stays the same for longer and there are less frequent feature changes.
    * https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/faq/
    I will send links for a couple of other articles by Private Message.
    Steps that may be safe for an IT department may not be recommended for the average reader of this forum.

  • WRT330N firewall blocks AXIS 206W webcam traffic

    I upgraded my Linksys WRT54GS to the WRT330N and so far, so good. The WRT330N is really a significant improvement.
    However, I can't get my AXIS 206W webcam to work. The webcam is registered on the Axis website and creates it's own IP address. So when I try to enter the webcam over the internet, I see in my router's logfile that it blocks the request for that particular IP address. Disabling my router's firewall solves the issue but that is obviously not desirable. I never had this problem with my previous Linksys router's firewall.
    Any thoughts?

    Sorry for the delay, here it is:
    Product and software version: AXIS 206W Network Camera version 4.40 External IP address: 68.193.237.187
    It seems that if I disable Filter Internet NAT Redirection the camera works. Is that a security concern?
    Message Edited by exm on 09-15-2007 03:10 PM

  • Firewall blocks ssh since Sept 12 update

    I have a Mac Pro Early 2008 running Lion 10.7.1 (11826). Since the "Security Update 2011-005" yesterday morning (Sept 12), the firewall does not allow incoming ssh connections, even though "remote login" is enabled in the "Sharing" preferences pane, and the firewall config page under "Security & Privacy" shows that "Remote Login (SSH)" is set to "Allow incoming connections". I do this all the time, and the behavior definitely changed with yesterday's update.
    To be clear, with the firewall turned off, I am able to ssh into the machine from another machine on the local network. When I turn the firewall on, despite the options set as described above, I am unable to make an ssh connection. This worked before yesterday's update. I think that Apple broke something with the update.

    Okay, I just found out you have to query anchor rules with a special switch (-a).
    I just found out there is no entry for SSH which should read something like
    "pass in on inet proto tcp from any to any port ssh keep state"
    euler:~ dr$ sudo pfctl -a "com.apple/100.InternetSharing" -vvvsr
    No ALTQ support in kernel
    ALTQ related functions disabled
    euler:~ dr$ sudo pfctl -a "com.apple/250.ApplicationFirewall" -vvvsr
    No ALTQ support in kernel
    ALTQ related functions disabled
    @0 block drop in inet proto icmp all icmp-type echoreq
      [ Evaluations: 306       Packets: 0         Bytes: 0           States: 0     ]
      [ Inserted: uid 0 pid 33285 ]
    @1 block drop in inet6 proto ipv6-icmp all icmp6-type echoreq
      [ Evaluations: 228       Packets: 0         Bytes: 0           States: 0     ]
      [ Inserted: uid 0 pid 33285 ]

  • Arno's firewall - blocking ICMP?

    Hey all, I'm trying to block my computer from responding to ping requests.
    I've found what appears to be the relevant syntax for iptables, but I can't use it with Arno' firewall script, which obviously is what I'm using for the rest of the firewall.
    I've tried adding the iptables commands to /etc/firewall-custom-rules, with no luck
    Does anyone else use this script, and have any ideas?
    Thanks,
    THom

    # iptables -A INPUT -i $EXT_IF -p icmp --icmp-type echo-request -j DROP
    Never used Arno's script, but that should drop icmp echo requests (pings).

Maybe you are looking for

  • BASIC QUESTIONS - VERY URGENT

    I have some basic questions regarding Oracle XMLDB's features. Is there a special JOIN clause that can be used in Oracle XMLDB? Can we create partitions in a set of records that are all based on the same DTD? How do we query records from a particular

  • Replicated partition is taking a long time

    I have been using a replicated partition to move some data from one Database to another and it has been working working fine. All of a sudden the replicated partition is taking a long time ( does not complete) when I run a maxl script to refresh the

  • Alpha Channel Problem

    Hi- I have an animated sequence with a transparent backround. Within this animation a window opens revealing a blue screen in which I place a picture. Behind the entire sequence I want to place a backround image, but no matter what, the background im

  • A switcher lost!!! HELP!!!

    Hello guys! Well, As i said in the title I'm a switcher so I'm a bit lost. I'm used to organise my files in a particular way so is easy for me to back up (which i do every other day). In my own way to organise things I have one main folder into HD wh

  • Exception in method when trigger PDFObject WS

    Hi, wonder anyone do before the PDFObject Tutorial. as i try to create a new Web Services the concept is about the same but different types... but somehow i encounter errors... as the WS has 4 methods createPdf (test.types.p1.CreatePdf parameters) ex