OSMF User Group Launch (Online only) | Thursday 11/19 @ 10:00 AM PST

This Thursday is the launch of the OSMF User Group! All are welcome. Please help us get the word out!
Please see the user group home page for details about how to attend. Home page here:
http://groups.adobe.com/groups/7af970e6e4
Presenter for this inaugural meeting will be Adobe's Brian Riggs who is a technical lead for the Open Source Media Framework.(OSMF). Brian will present via a live screencast. Brian will provide a brief overview of OSMF and will dedicate the bulk of his presentation to providing a detailed walk through on how to implement OSMF features now available. Questions and answers will be taken throughout via text chat pods, and at the end as well.
This initial meeting is scheduled to last 1 hour and 30 minutes. Meeting start time will be 10:00 AM PST. All media player developers and business managers worldwide are welcome (please do timezone adjustments as necessary to match your timezone).
Future meetings will be on the 3rd Wednesday of every month. Please watch the user group home page for announcements about future meeting details.
Please forward notice about both this meeting and this group to all who you think may be interested.

bump

Similar Messages

ANN: Adobe Spry User Group launched

Hello,
I'm honored to announce the launch of the first Adobe Spry User Group, Spry-it. In all the years I have worked with Spry both on a personal as well as on a enterprise level I came to realize that there really little blogging, articles, documentation and information written by the community for the community. There are a few youtube video's here and there. But its all scattered over the place. Spry-it aims to solve that by attempting to become a center point of community driven content, providing users with new ways to receive information and learn about Spry from RSS feeds to Adobe Wave notifications till e-mail newsletters. Not only will we attempt to bundle and organise content, we will also be providing you with content and Spry related services.
A few highlights that we attempt to provide:
A new searchable, API system, that actually contains all the information about the Frameworks methods. Not only the once the Spry team has documented. This will allow users to find more advance, and sometimes more powerful methods that will make it easier to create or polish their applications.
Articles, this will range from skinning a various of widgets. Till creating your own widgets. But also explaining best practices and performance tricks they can apply to improve Spry it self.
A desktop application that will wrap all the information for the users, providing offline documentation that will automatically update it self once connection with internet has been created.
New demo's, these will push Spry to its limits providing you insights to advance techniques with little code.
Working with new platforms, think about Iphone, Adobe AIR, Aptana Jaxer, Palm Pre.
And much more.
So sign-up, its FREE And you just use your Adobe Account to log in. http://groups.adobe.com/groups/f1621de53b/summary
If you have idea's for your self, I'm still searching for a co-manager. The only requirement is passion.

vw2ureg wrote:
Is bumping allowed in this forum?
I cannot find anything in the guidelines on the subject.
Ben
Personally I don't mind bumping a few topics here and there. For example if something requires attention. But just posting the word "bump" will be considered spam. The bump content needs to add some sort of value to the topic.
As for Spry-it.com progress. We are currently running on our staging server, connecting the nuts and bolts with the screws .
The Adobe groups platform is getting updated and I hope to get something running on Spry-it.com by that.

Restricting certain users groups to read only for certain folders

Hi
I'm not sure if this is the correct forum, but hey, hopefully someone might now the answer or direct me to the correct one.
I'm writing a VB program to amend ACLs for specific user groups.
Effectively, I make all prior year folders read only, whereas the default for the group is Modify, Delete etc. This means they can continue to work in the "new year folders", but historic years is List/read only.
I've got to the point the program does everything I want, i.e. stops folder creation7deletion, file & folder name changes, copying for the historic years, but does not prevent deletion of files in the folder. Effectively I set Deny access on the
historic folders.
Testing using the Windows GUI would appear to resolve the problem is I change the Deny Special Permission (for the group) from "This folder only" to "This folder & files".
Question then is how to I set this in VB, the default appearing to be "This folder only"
Here's extract of my code
Thanks
IfvarDirectoryName.IndexOf("\"&
Date.Now.Year) = -1
Then
            FileAcl3.AddAccessRule(
NewFileSystemAccessRule(GroupAdmin(0),
FileSystemRights.Modify,
AccessControlType.Deny))
            FileAcl3.AddAccessRule(
NewFileSystemAccessRule(GroupAdmin(0),
FileSystemRights.DeleteSubdirectoriesAndFiles,
AccessControlType.Deny))
            FileAcl3.RemoveAccessRule(
NewFileSystemAccessRule(GroupAdmin(0),
FileSystemRights.ReadAndExecute,
AccessControlType.Deny))
            FileAcl3.RemoveAccessRule(
NewFileSystemAccessRule(GroupAdmin(0),
FileSystemRights.ListDirectory,
AccessControlType.Deny))
Dim FileInfo3 As IO.FileInfo = New IO.FileInfo(varDirectoryName)
Dim FileAcl3 As New FileSecurity
If varDirectoryName.IndexOf("\" & Date.Now.Year) = -1 Then
FileAcl3.AddAccessRule(New FileSystemAccessRule(GroupAdmin(0), FileSystemRights.Modify, AccessControlType.Deny))
FileAcl3.AddAccessRule(New FileSystemAccessRule(GroupAdmin(0), FileSystemRights.DeleteSubdirectoriesAndFiles, AccessControlType.Deny))
FileAcl3.RemoveAccessRule(New FileSystemAccessRule(GroupAdmin(0), FileSystemRights.ReadAndExecute, AccessControlType.Deny))
FileAcl3.RemoveAccessRule(New FileSystemAccessRule(GroupAdmin(0), FileSystemRights.ListDirectory, AccessControlType.Deny))
FileInfo3.SetAccessControl(FileAcl3)
End If

Ho Rohn
Your right, when I added the flags I got the following error at execution
{"No flags can be set. Parameter name: inheritanceFlags"}
I've developed a work around, which gives me exactly - subject to further testing - what I want. I simply mark each file in the relevant folders with a Deny Delete option.
I will however explore the DirectorySecurity class option, but initial review of the www seems a little shy on VB examples.
Thanks
Perry
You should be able to use FileSecurity and DirectorySecurity the same way (they have identical methods). Since this is a scripting forum, I'll provide a PowerShell example (which is fairly close to C# and VB; they all use the exact same classes):
$varDirectoryName = "c:\folder"
$GroupAdmin = "Admin Group"
$FileInfo3 = New-Object System.IO.DirectoryInfo $varDirectoryName
$FileAcl3 = $FileInfo3.GetAccessControl()
$FileAcl3.AddAccessRule((New-Object System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemAccessRule (
$GroupAdmin,
[System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemRights]::Modify,
([System.Security.AccessControl.InheritanceFlags]::ContainerInherit -bor [System.Security.AccessControl.InheritanceFlags]::ObjectInherit),
[System.Security.AccessControl.PropagationFlags]::None,
[System.Security.AccessControl.AccessControlType]::Allow
$FileInfo3.SetAccessControl($FileAcl3)
I could have taken a lot of shortcuts when using the enumerations, but I think keeping it verbose helps show how similar the code can be.
Does that make sense?

SCCM 2012: create user/group which can only import computers, reset pxe boots

Hi,
We would like to give helpdesk some basic rights so they can add computers (via mac/pc name) and reset pxe-boots.
We might grant extra rights but would like to start with these basic ones.
I know the setup is fully different (RBAC) so your feedback how you implemented this would be highy appreciated.
J.
Jan Hoedt

You can use "Custom Role Based Administration for Importing Computers" (http://blogs.technet.com/b/inside_osd/archive/2012/04/30/custom-role-based-administration-for-importing-computers.aspx)
as a starting point. Then use "RBA Viewer" (part of the toolkit) to create your own, custom roles.
Torsten Meringer | http://www.mssccmfaq.de

OSMF Online-only User Group Meeting -- Edwin van Rijkom | TODAY Wed, Jan 20 @ 12:00 NOON PST

TODAY Wed, Jan 20 @ 12:00 NOON PST we are having the third meeting of the online-only OSMF User Group ( http://www.adobe.com/go/osmf_usergroup ).
The online-only OSMF User Group is pleased to have a live presentation on OSMF's new features by a developer from the OSMF Team, Edwin van Rijkom, Sr. Computer Scientist at Adobe. This meeting is open to all who are interested. Please forward notice about this meeting to all who you think may be interested.
The link for the online meeting room can be found in the meeting announcement link here:
http://groups.adobe.com/posts/3e8fddb492
Edwin will be reviewing changes and new features in OSMF delivered in Sprint 8 (released December), as well as providing an overview of new features in Sprint 9 (releasing next week).
Topics to be covered include:
API Refactoring Changes
Subclip Support
Live Streaming Support
Flash Media Manifest File Format (F4M) Support
Multi-BitRate (MBR) Streaming;
Digital Rights Management (DRM) via Flash Access,
Closed Captioning Plug-in
Pre-Assigned Durations
Edwin previously presented at the Adobe MAX 2009 conference as a co-presenter on the session entitled "Introduction to Adobe's Open Source Media Framework". Following is a link for a recording of Edwin's MAX Session (Edwin's portion starting at 24:00 in the recording timecode):
http://max.adobe.com/online/session/332
OSMF is an open source ActionScript 3 framework for building video and media players supporting cutting edge Flash Platform features for media delivery. If you have any curiosity about media players in Flash or Flex, this is a great forum for exploring and getting questions answered.
If you have an ongoing interest in this area, please join this group by logging in at groups.adobe.com/groups/7af970e6e4 and selecting the "JOIN THIS GROUP" link (red graphic on right side).
This online-only OSMF User Group meets regularly at this time and day of every month. That is the 3rd Wednesday of every month @ 12:00 NOON PST time. All meetings are recorded. Links for prior meeting recordings are on the group site in various places including on the group home page under the heading "Previous Connect Sessions".
Following are a few time zone conversions:
London: 8:00 PM to 9:30 PM GMT
Rome/Paris/Berlin: 9:00 PM to 10:30 PM CET
New York: 3:00 PM to 4:30 PM EST
Los Angeles: 12:00 NOON to 1:30 PM PST
Sydney: 7:00 AM to 8:30 AM EDT ** THURSDAY January 21 **

The presentation by Will Law was recorded and can be viewed online, on-demand from the following link:
http://experts.na3.acrobat.com/p47054887/
Will's presentation is an excellent introduction to HTTP Dynamic Streaming.
This presentation is a supersized version of a presentation that Will also will be delivering at Adobe MAX 2010. MAX session description here:
http://bit.ly/bh77Gz
Supersized in that in the recording above Will spent a bit more time in ActionScript for the OSMF developers in attendance than he will with more general audiences. Plus supersized in that Will took 1 hour 15 minutes (plus 15 minutes more on Q&A), whereas MAX sessions are 60 minutes, less a few minutes for the Q&A.,
hth,
g

What is the Advantage of creation of user group through SUGR?

Hello Masters,
As per audit requirement I have maintained user groups for different sets of users through SUGR, but I am not getting except differenciating users (based on group), is there any other advantage? Can we assign role to a user group instead of assigning to list of users or can we do any mass changes to an user group by giving only user group name.
Regards,
Nilutpal.

Dear Neels,
Apart from maintaining user group for Differnciation purpose you can also take the advantage on the following sectors:
1. Follow the http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ce/17533e5ff4d064e10000000a114084/content.htm link . From this you will come to know the use of user group in the authorisation area.
2. User Groups also allow segregation of user maintenance, this is especially useful in a large organisation as you can control who your user admin team can maintain - an example would be giving a team leader the authority to change passwords for users in their team.
3. The authorization user group is used in conjunction with S_USER_GROUP authorization object. It allows to create security management authorization by user group. e.g. you can have a local security administrator only able to manage users in his groups, Help-Desk to reset password for all users except users in group SUPER, etc...
In case any issue, please feel free to reply.
Regards,
Nilutpal.

Authenticated Users Group Question

I have a quick question regarding the Authenticated Users "group". I used to be a systems administrator, but I'm a bit rusty since I've been a software developer for the last 10 years. A conflict with data center operations (DCO) group
at work lead me to get another opinion.
The question is this... is the authenticated users group a domain-level group or is there a local authenticated users group that would allow only users authenticated locally? We have a share that permits the authenticated users group access.
My opinion is that all domain users who have authenticated successfully have access to this share. The DCO group is telling me that this is the local (to the server containing the share of course) authenticated users group only.
Is there such a thing as a local-only authenticated users group? To me this doesn't even make sense, but I could very well be wrong.
Nathon Dalton
Sr. Software Engineer
Blog: http://nathondalton.wordpress.com

I apologize. I don't think I explained myself correctly. Let's consider the following...
SERVER: SERVER1
DOMAIN: DOMAIN1
SHARE: \\SERVER1\SHARE1
SHARE PERMISSIONS: Authenticated Users - Full Control
Given the above information, is it possible that the Authenticated Users group will allow ONLY users that are defined on SERVER1 to access \\SERVER1\SHARE1?
My understanding is that's not possible. There's one defined Authenticated Users group and that represents ALL users that are authenticated against DOMAIN1, whether added to local groups, shares, etc.
What I'm being told however is that SHARE1 having Authenticated Users assigned is okay since only those user accounts defined on SERVER1 will be able to access it. All the users in the domain will NOT be able to access it. I think this is bogus. Am I wrong?
Nathon Dalton
Sr. Lead Developer
Blog: http://www.nathondalton.com

Planner provisioning for user groups lost in Shared services

Hi All,
Everything was fine. All of a sudden, no users were able to login in to planning.
On investigation it was found that all the planner/planning provision to the groups is lost in the shared services.
Digged into log for a while and couldnt find out any issues.
What could be the reason we lost user group security provisioning only to planning?
Could anyone please help on this?
Regards,
GG

I used to have same experience every time migration happens from dev to UAT or prod etc.
After migration, registering with shared service will be successful. When i try to sync, migrate user identities (provisionusers.cmd) from shared service all user group info vanishes in planning (Add/Edit access page). i.e hsp_access_control table is truncated or all rows are dropped.
Then i have to set it up correctly. Guess this happens because usergroups have different id between different environments. When sync'g planning at target, it will not be able to recognize the wrong usergroup id of source system.
My assumption:
When provisionusers.cmd is run, planning fetches the usergroup provisioning information from shared services in to hsp_access_control planning repository table. could someone confirm the same?
Is there any other way to overcome this issue recurring on every time migration happens?
But the problem today was different: the provisioning is lost in the shared services itself which i havent witnessed so far. We didnt migrate recently, everything was file till 8 AM, but screwed around 8.10 AM. everything was up and running.
Cheers,
GG

Authenticated Users Group

As I understand the AU group is made up by any user that logs in. However, it does not work when I specify access to a TAB page so is only visible for AU. In this case the TAB is also available for the PUBLIC user.
I am working with Portal 3.0 EA on an Intel/NT plataform, my question is: is this the way that was supossed to be or it is something that has to do with the version that I am using...?
Thanks

I apologize. I don't think I explained myself correctly. Let's consider the following...
SERVER: SERVER1
DOMAIN: DOMAIN1
SHARE: \\SERVER1\SHARE1
SHARE PERMISSIONS: Authenticated Users - Full Control
Given the above information, is it possible that the Authenticated Users group will allow ONLY users that are defined on SERVER1 to access \\SERVER1\SHARE1?
My understanding is that's not possible. There's one defined Authenticated Users group and that represents ALL users that are authenticated against DOMAIN1, whether added to local groups, shares, etc.
What I'm being told however is that SHARE1 having Authenticated Users assigned is okay since only those user accounts defined on SERVER1 will be able to access it. All the users in the domain will NOT be able to access it. I think this is bogus. Am I wrong?
Nathon Dalton
Sr. Lead Developer
Blog: http://www.nathondalton.com

When is the next West iAS User Group Session?

The West Application Server User Group will meet on Thursday, May 23rd, 2002 from 9:00 - 4:30 at Wells Fargo, 425 Market St., San Francisco, CA. For more information or to rsvp for this session contact Kristen Keane ([email protected] or 978-634-1600).

Allowing the domain users Group to SCCM 2012 Remote Control

Hi There,
been working on this issue for the last few days now and its frustrating the crap out of me. My company has requested for all Domain users to be allowed to Remote Control to everyone's computer. This is so that users will be able to show each other how to
use in house application. In SCCM 2012 console, I've added the Domain users to the Premitted viewer tab. I've also added the domain user group to the administrative user section, added the Remote operator role and assigned the
ALL security scope to it. On another machine, i run the CMRCviewer to this machine and it prompts for username advising me the one i provided isn't authorized. when i check on the targeted machine, i can see domain users populated in the ConfigMgr
remote control user group
It seems only domain admins have rights to Remote control in. i've only got one client setting defined (default policy).
the interesting thing is the following layout
WINDOWS XP ---> WINDOWS 7 prompts for username
WINDOWS 7 -----> WINDOWS XP works
WINDOWS XP -----> WINDOWS XP works
WINDOWS 7 ------> WINDOWS 7 prompts for username

Hi Dave,
1) yes domain users is part of the configMgr remote control users". CMRCSERVICE.log shows the following
=== Starting security handshake ===
CmRcService
11/03/2013 10:44:29 AM
4808 (0x12C8)
HandshakeWorker failed..
The logon attempt failed (Error: 8009030C; Source: Windows)
CmRcService 11/03/2013 10:44:29 AM
4808 (0x12C8)
Security filter server: DoHandshake failed..
The logon attempt failed (Error: 8009030C; Source: Windows)
CmRcService 11/03/2013 10:44:29 AM
4808 (0x12C8)
m_pSecFilter DoHandshake() failed. CmRcService
11/03/2013 10:44:29 AM 4808 (0x12C8)
DoHandshake failed on server side.
The logon attempt failed (Error: 8009030C; Source: Windows)
CmRcService 11/03/2013 10:44:29 AM
4808 (0x12C8)
Failed to do Handshake in Server.
The logon attempt failed (Error: 8009030C; Source: Windows)
CmRcService 11/03/2013 10:44:29 AM
4808 (0x12C8)
Failed to create security context.. Security Handshake failed.
The logon attempt failed (Error: 8009030C; Source: Windows)
CmRcService 11/03/2013 10:44:29 AM
4808 (0x12C8)
Failed to validate Security requirement..
The logon attempt failed (Error: 8009030C; Source: Windows)
CmRcService 11/03/2013 10:44:29 AM
4808 (0x12C8)
Failed to complete the RDP connection..
The logon attempt failed (Error: 8009030C; Source: Windows)
CmRcService 11/03/2013 10:44:29 AM
4808 (0x12C8)
i've confirmed this user is part of domain users as well.

First Logic Pro user-group meeting in Los Angeles!

Los Angeles Logic Pro User Group meeting #1
! User Group launching event !
Saturday, November 5th, 2005 8pm to 9:30pm
@ the ReMix Hotel
Location: The Musician's Institute
1655 N. McCadden Place, Hollywood, California
one block south of Hollywood Boulevard and one block east of Highland Avenue
This is a FREE event open to everyone!
Guest Speakers: Bob Hunt, Apple Logic Pro developer. Others TBA.
There will be prizes given away by Apple, and free video Logic tutorial giveaways by Mac Pro Video.
"This is not an Apple sponsored event."

Set up a QT Streaming Server or FlashComm Server... then, I can be there. :-D
Jord... you got me thinking. The event will be filmed and I will post a Quicktime video on my website after the week end. I have also opened a new thread where all those who won't be able to attend can post their questions to Apple.
Saturday night, we will have a big Q&A session with Bob Hunt and I will try to ask as many of those questions as possible, and then report back with the answers after the meeting.

How do I stop iTunes (10.7) from automatically launching upon restart? "Open at Login" is NOT checked in the dock and I have removed the app from Login Items under Users/Groups. I am using a MacBook version 10.7.5. Thank you!

How do I stop iTunes (10.7) from automatically launching upon restart? "Open at Login" is NOT checked in the dock and I have removed the app from Login Items under Users/Groups. I am using a MacBook version 10.7.5. Thank you!

Thanks for the response gakker, but I've double-checked the camera / iPhoto / Image Capture scenario, and I'm 100% positive it's got nothing to do with that.
Plugging in my iPhone has no effect on anything related to this.
The other thing I should have mentioned is that when iTunes on my Mac is NOT running, then nothing happens on my iPhone screen when I plug it in to my Mac. I only get the "Sync in progress" message when iTunes IS running.
It's interesting though that you say you also get this "Sync in progress" message, albeit only for a second or two though.
Can I just double-check something with you however... When you say:
+"at no time was my iTunes playback interrupted"+
do you mean the iTunes on your Mac? Because the problem I have is that the iPod-playback on my iPhone is interrupted.
So can you clarify that for me, please? If you have music playing on your iPhone, and you then plug your iPhone into your Mac when iTunes is running on your Mac, does the music playback on the iPhone get interrupted?

How to only synchronize one specific LDAP user group with SAP?

Hi,
Hopefully this is the correct forum to post this in. I want to have continuous one-way synchronization of users from my LDAP server to my SAP central system. I've started configure in SAP using transaction SM59 and LDAP. Can I somewhere set that only one specific LDAP user group shall be transferred to SAP (they do not need to be assigned to any specific group, profile, role in SAP) - or should this be done on the LDAP server side (or is it at all possible)?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the User Group field in the report RSLDAPSYNC_USER only concerns SAP user groups right? This would therefore not be sufficient since I want to select the users to synchronize based on user groups in the directory.
Thanks, Oscar

We've used a repository constant to specify the LDAP filter for reading users / groups from the LDAP target.
E.g. LDAP_FILTER_USERS (&(objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user))
Then we also have a constant for the LDAP_STARTING_POINT
For our AD Group Initial Load we filter according to these settings:
LDAP_FILTER_GROUPS = (objectclass=group)
LDAP_STARTING_POINT_GROUPS = ou=IDMManagedGroups,ou=Groups,dc=cfstest,dc=le,dc=ac,dc=uk
The above example only reads AD groups starting at the specified OU
Then in a Job From LDAP Pass the LDAP URL looks like this:
LDAP://%$rep.LDAP_HOST%:%$rep.LDAP_PORT%/%$rep.LDAP_STARTING_POINT_GROUPS%?*?SUB?%$rep.LDAP_FILTER_GROUPS%
I hope this helps
Paul

Sharing Only Accounts don't show in Users & Groups

Hi,
I've done a fresh install of Maverick yesterday.
And I created a "Sharing Only" account so I can access my iMac from another PC (so it doesn't show up at logon time)
When I went back in Users and Groups this morning, my newly "Sharing Only" account had gone.
So I thought I'd forgotten it and tried to create it again: to my surprise at creation time, Mac OS reports: "Name is used by another user", when in fact it's not listed in the left sidebar (I can only see my accout and the guest account)
I tried the same with a "Standard user" and all is fine.
I tried with a second "Sharing Only" account and it disappeared too (after a logoff)
I've found this article: http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4404 but I don't wanna screw up my fresh install
Can anyone help?

here also the same ... totally fresh out of the box Mac Mini with update to 10.9.2 ... create a share only user called "conf_share", add this user to a existing share ... go back to the User & Groups and paaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhh it's disappear (but still existing of course)
I found this "hint" but this is only usefull if you want to delete this user without going crazy... this hint will convert the sharing only user to a standard user
Just type the following two commands in terminal:
Quit and reopen System preferences and the sharing account will show up:
sudo dscl . create /Users/root GeneratedUID FFFFEEEE-DDDD-CCCC-BBBB-AAAA00000000
and then:
sudo dscl . create /Users/accountname UserShell /bin/bash
Replace "accountname" in the commands above with the missing account name.

OSMF User Group Launch (Online only) | Thursday 11/19 @ 10:00 AM PST

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for