OSPF down-bit set for a route originated as static?

If remote PE is redistributing a static route to VRF, local PE will get this route via BGP. Now suppose this local PE and CE is running OSPF and BGP VPNv4 route is redistributed to OSPF, will this PE set down-bit for type 5 LSAs advertised to CE?
I am bit confused by RFC-4576, it states that "When a type 3, 5, or 7 LSA is sent from a PE to a CE, the DN bit MUST be set", my understanding is that only if the route is originated from OSPF (at remote PE) then PE will set down-bit in LSAs advertised to CE.

Niranjan,
IOS also set the tag to the BGP ASN on external routes as a loop avoidance mechanism as described in RFC 4577, section 4.2.5.2. According to the same RFC, this method has to be supported by default by any compliant implementation for backward compatibility purposes.
RFC4576: Using a Link State Advertisement (LSA) Options Bit to Prevent Looping in BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4576.txt?number=4576
RFC4577: OSPF as the Provider/Customer Edge Protocol for BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4577.txt?number=4577
Regards,

Similar Messages

External route with Down Bit set by CE router

I have a question regarding the Down Bit. All the documentation I see concentrates on the redistribution of the MP-BGP into OSPF but I want to know more about the OSPF redistribution into MP-BGP. I think the rule is different for Type3 and Type5 LSAs.
Lets say the CE redistributes a RIP route into OSPF, creating an LSA Type 5 route sent to the PE router - with the Down Bit set.
Will this PE router redistribute this route into MP-BGP?
I know that LSA Type 3 summary routes will not be redistributed into MP-BGP if the Down Bit is set but I am wondering about external OSPF routes with the Down Bit set????
I am assuming that redistribution of RIP into OSPF at the CE does infact set this Down Bit before passing on to the PE router?

How can step 2 in the sequence description say that PE2-AS1 receives an OSPF route with the Down Bit already set? This comes from the CE.
I find this all very confusing when I check out these sequences - I thought only the PE router assigns Down Bit to LSA Type 3 routes?
All the other references I see show how PE1-AS1 would normally set the Down Bit as it is redistributed back into OSPF?
Thanks for your help - I feel I am getting closer. It is just this second step that is throwing me!
Cheers
Walter

IOS feature set for subinterface routing . . .

I just acquired a couple of 2600s with single eth. interfaces. I would like to configure subinterfaces (one for public IP, the other for internal.) However, my current IOS insists that I can not assign IP addresses until I make the main interface a part of an ISL or dotq VLAN. Can someone tell me which feature I'm looking for in the feature navigator? I have a feeling I'm going to need to upgrade my routers from their current 32/8 mem.
-Shikamaru

Hi Shikamaru,
You need to have atleast IP PLUS feature IOS on your box to make encapsulation command working on subinterface.
Regards,
Ankur

OSPF downward bit in MPLS network

Hi all,
I have an issue with using the OSPF downward bit and hope someone has seen this before. It appears to do nothing in this example to prevent routes being learnt via the wrong path. That is via a backup router that has learnt the route from the site primary router which has received the OSPF route originally redistibuted into OSPF from the PE (with downward bit set).
The docco says:
"The down bit is used between the PE-routers to indicate which routes were inserted into the OSPF topology database from the MPLS VPN super-backbone and thus shall not be redistributed back in the MPLS VPN super-backbone. The PE-router that redistributes the MP-BGP route as OSPF route into the OSPF topology database sets the down bit. Other PE-routers use the down bit to prevent this route from being redistributed back into MP-BGP. "
Therefore I would not expect a route received with the downward bit set to be installed into the route table nor BGP table however the below shows it is? This has essentially created a routing scenario where core routes are learnt via a dual OSPF attached access site.
The PE receiving the incorrect route:
7609#sh ip ospf 116 database summary 192.168.104.0
            OSPF Router with ID (10.200.204.116) (Process ID 116)
        Summary Net Link States (Area 0)
LS age: 1094
Options: (No TOS-capability, DC, Downward)
LS Type: Summary Links(Network)
Link State ID: 192.168.104.0 (summary Network Number)
Advertising Router: 10.200.212.116
LS Seq Number: 80000013
Checksum: 0xFDB1
Length: 28
Network Mask: /24
    MTID: 0     Metric: 1798
7609#sh ip route vrf RED 192.168.104.0
Routing Table: RED
Routing entry for 192.168.104.0/24
Known via "ospf 116", distance 110, metric 1798, type intra area
Redistributing via bgp 100
Advertised by bgp 100 match internal external 1 & 2 nssa-external 1 & 2
Last update from 10.1.59.138 on GigabitEthernet1/0/1.3684, 00:18:23 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.1.59.138, from 10.200.4.229, 00:18:23 ago, via GigabitEthernet1/0/1.3684
      Route metric is 1798, traffic share count is 1
7609#sh ip bgp vpnv4 vrf RED 192.168.104.0
BGP routing table entry for 100:116:192.168.104.0/24, version 195113
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table RED)
Advertised to update-groups:
     1
Local
10.1.59.138 from 0.0.0.0 (10.200.0.65)
      Origin incomplete, metric 1798, localpref 100, weight 32768, valid, sourced, best
      Extended Community: RT:100:116 OSPF DOMAIN ID:0x0005:0x000000740200
        OSPF RT:0.0.0.0:2:0 OSPF ROUTER ID:10.200.204.116:512
      mpls labels in/out 312/nolabel
7609#
Regards,
Kent.

Ive implemented what I consider to be a workaround, but it does now work as expected. I had to filter the updates received by the PE from the primary CPE at each site to only accept the LAN range from that site, not the LAN range from other sites that it was learning via the backup CPE, via PE, via other site backup router. I think I was barking up the wrong tree re the downward bit. This issue is because there is indirect OSPF connectivity between all the CPE's connected to the same PE. Basically the PE needs to never pass on LSA's learnt from one CPE to another CPE then we would be all ok.
I still have an issue to solve for PPP xDSL services as they all share the one loopback as an ip unnumbered interface on the PE. The same distribute list approach wont work there.
Here is what I have done. There must be a less config intense and flexible approach to this.
router ospf 116 vrf RED
distribute-list prefix RED-acacia-ospf-subnets-inbound in GigabitEthernet1/0/1.3681
distribute-list prefix RED-acacia-ospf-subnets-inbound in GigabitEthernet1/0/1.3682
distribute-list prefix RED-geebung-ospf-subnets-inbound in GigabitEthernet1/0/1.3684
distribute-list prefix RED-kawana-ospf-subnets-inbound in GigabitEthernet1/0/1.3685
distribute-list prefix RED-goldcoast-ospf-subnets-inbound in GigabitEthernet1/0/1.3686
ip prefix-list RED-geebung-ospf-subnets-inbound permit 192.168.103.0/24
ip prefix-list RED-acacia-ospf-subnets-inbound permit 192.168.100.0/24
ip prefix-list RED-acacia-ospf-subnets-inbound permit 0.0.0.0/32
ip prefix-list RED-kawana-ospf-subnets-inbound permit 192.168.104.0/24
ip prefix-list RED-goldcoast-ospf-subnets-inbound permit 192.168.101.0/24

My pc is down and I'm trying to put a wep for this router so no one can use my internet but me. Is there anyway I can set a password with an iPad as I don't have a desktop or laptop?

My pc is down and I'm trying to put a wep for this router so no one can use my internet but me. Is there anyway I can set a password with an iPad as I don't have a desktop or a laptop. Please help.

The AirPorts, unlike routers provided by other manufacturers, do not provide a web-based administration interface ... so the PS3 or any browser would not work.

OSPF LSA with DC bit set

Hello,
If an LSA is received by an OSPF router which is not Demand Circuit capable, will that LSA be installed in link state database?
Thanks

How can step 2 in the sequence description say that PE2-AS1 receives an OSPF route with the Down Bit already set? This comes from the CE.
I find this all very confusing when I check out these sequences - I thought only the PE router assigns Down Bit to LSA Type 3 routes?
All the other references I see show how PE1-AS1 would normally set the Down Bit as it is redistributed back into OSPF?
Thanks for your help - I feel I am getting closer. It is just this second step that is throwing me!
Cheers
Walter

Why did the setting for my Linksys WRT54G router change spontaneously from encrypted to open mode?

I unplugged power to my Linksys WRT54G (802.11g) router for about six days. It had been set for WEP 128-bit encryption. When I replugged it, it identified itself as an open (non-encrypted) network. I could use it by setting up a new network connection (unencrypted) on my PC, but could not access it using the original (encrypted) PC network connection.
After reinstalling the router, and setting it for WEP 128-bit encryption, it works fine again.
Can anyone explain why the router spontaneously went from encrypted to non-encrypted mode, as a result of being powered down for several days? (Is this a bug or a feature?

Thank you. As noted, I reconfigured it & it works fine again. But do you have any idea why it "lost" its encryption setting by being powered-down?
In particular, is this likely to happen in future if I power-down Linksys?

Region setting for Actiontec MI424-WR router?

I play an online customizable card game, called Legends of Norrath. Every so often they have tournaments, and up until this July I've been able to partake just fine. However, as of late I get a message saying I am ineligible since I am trying to connect from outside a US territory (gambling/tax laws or something). I'm in Portland, OR. I submitted a CS ticket with the company (Sony Online Entertainment), but they say everything looks fine from their end. One person, though, suggested checking what country my router was set to, as they had known of someone's router getting reset to Canada, making them ineligible.
I searched the router's settings very closely, but I find nothing relation to region aside from a time zone setting. Thorough web searches have turned up nothing.
I am not using any proxies, my location according to my IP address is more or less accurate when I look on a site like http://ip-address.domaintools.com/, and a tracert to one of SoE's domains seems to go nowhere besides Portland, Seattle, and San Diego.
So first of all, does anyone know if a country setting exists for this router, and if so, where to find it? Secondly, has anyone run into a problem like this and found an alternate solution?
Thanks for your assistance.

This type of thing has been discussed here before.
As Verizon expands and aquires additional blocks of TCP/IP Addresses some of them may have been previouslsy assigned to an ISP in a different geographic portion of the world. The problems is that there are databases with this information that do not all update at the same time. I would guess that the database that the game provider is using still has the old location which is why they are pegging you as coming from outside the US.
You can attempt to release your TCP/IP Address, power down your Modem for over 6 hours, and then power it back up. This MAY get you a different IP Address, but it could still be in the same block. A better approach would be to open a new ticket with the game provider to ask them if they are determining your location by your IP Address and if so to update their database.
If you are the original poster (OP) and your issue is solved, please remember to click the "Solution?" button so that others can more easily find it.
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the "Kudos" button.

New files and folders on a Linux client mounting a Windows 2012 Server for NFS share do not inherit Owner and Group when SetGID bit set

Problem statement
When I mount a Windows NFS service file share using UUUA and set the Owner and Group, and set the SetGID bit on the parent folder in a hierarchy. New Files and folders inside and underneath the parent folder do not inherit the Owner and Group permissions
of the parent.
I am given to understand from this Microsoft KnowledgeBase article (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/951716/en-gb) the problem is due to the Windows implmentation of NFS Services not supporting the Solaris SystemV or BSD grpid "Semantics"
However the article says the same functionality can acheived by using ACE Inheritance in conjunction with changing the Registry setting for "KeepInheritance" to enable Inheritance propagation of the Permissions by the Windows NFS Services.
1. The Precise location of the "KeepInheritance" DWORD key appears to have "moved" in Windows Server 2012 from a Services path to a Software path, is this documented somewhere? And after enabling it, (or creating it in the previous
location) the feature seems non-functional. Is there a method to file a Bug with Microsoft for this Feature?
2. All of the references on demonstrating how to set an ACE to achieve the same result "currently" either lead to broken links on Microsoft technical websites, or are not explicit they are vague or circumreferential. There are no plain Examples.
Can an Example be provided?
3. Is UUUA compatible with the method of setting ACE to acheive this result, or must the Linux client mount be "Mapped" using an Authentication source. And could that be with the new Flat File passwd and group files in c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc
and is there an Example available.
Scenario:
Windows Server 2012 Standard
File Server (Role)
+- Server for NFS (Role) << -- installed
General --
Folder path: F:\Shares\raid-6-array
Remote path: fs4:/raid-6-array
Protocol: NFS
Authentication --
No server authentication
+- No server authentication (AUTH_SYS)
++- Enable unmapped user access
+++- Allow unmapped user access by UID/GID
Share Permissions --
Name: linux_nfs_client.host.edu
Permissions: Read/Write
Root Access: Allowed
Encoding: ANSI
NTFS Permissions --
Type: Allow
Principal: BUILTIN\Administrators
Access: Full Control
Applies to: This folder only
Type: Allow
Principal: NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM
Access: Full Control
Applies to: This folder only
-- John Willis, Facebook: John-Willis, Skype: john.willis7416

I'm making some "major" progress on this problem.
1. Apparently the "semantics" issue to honor SGID or grpid in NFS on the server side or the client side has been debated for some time. It also existed as of 2009 between Solaris nfs server and Linux nfs clients. The Linux community defaulted to declaring
it a "Server" side issue to avoid "Race" conditions between simultaneous access users and the local file system daemons. The client would have to "check" for the SGID and reformulate its CREATE request to specify the Secondary group it would have to "notice"
by which time it could have changed on the server. SUN declined to fix it.. even though there were reports it did not behave the same between nfs3 vs nfs4 daemons.. which might be because nfs4 servers have local ACL or ACE entries to process.. and a new local/nfs
"inheritance" scheme to worry about honoring.. that could place it in conflict with remote access.. and push the responsibility "outwards" to the nfs client.. introducing a race condition, necessitating "locking" semantics.
This article covers that discovery and no resolution - http://thr3ads.net/zfs-discuss/2009/10/569334-CR6894234-improved-sgid-directory-compatibility-with-non-Solaris-NFS-clients
2. A much Older Microsoft Knowledge Based article had explicit examples of using Windows ACEs and Inheritance to "mitigate" the issue.. basically the nfs client "cannot" update an ACE to make it "Inheritable" [-but-] a Windows side Admin or Windows User
[-can-] update or promote an existing ACE to "Inheritable"
Here are the pertinent statements -
"In Windows Services for UNIX 2.3, you can use the KeepInheritance registry value to set inheritable ACEs and to make sure that these ACEs apply to newly created files and folders on NFS shares."
"Note About the Permissions That Are Set by NFS Clients
The KeepInheritance option only applies ACEs that have inheritance enabled. Any permissions that are set by an NFS client will
only apply to that file or folder, so the resulting ACEs created by an NFS client will
not have inheritance set."
"So
If you want a folder's permissions to be inherited to new subfolders and files, you must set its permissions from the Windows NFS server because the permissions that are set by NFS clients only apply to the folder itself."
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321049
3. I have set up a Windows 2008r2 NFS server and mounted it with a Redhat Enteprise Linux 5 release 10 x86_64 server [Oct 31, 2013] and so far this does appear to be the case.
4. In order to mount and then switch user to a non-root user to create subdirectories and files, I had to mount the NFS share (after enabling Anonymous AUTH_SYS mapping) this is not a good thing, but it was because I have been using UUUA - Unmapped Unix
User Access Mapping, which makes no attempt to "map" a Unix UID/GID set by the NFS client to a Windows User account.
To verify the Inheritance of additional ACEs on new subdirectories and files created by a non-root Unix user, on the Windows NFS server I used the right click properties, security tab context menu, then Advanced to list all the ACEs and looked at the far
Column reflecting if it applied to [This folder only, or This folder and Subdirectories, or This folder and subdirectories and files]
5. All new Subdirectories and files createdby the non-root user had a [Non-Inheritance] ACE created for them.
6. I turned a [Non-Inheritance] ACE into an [Inheritance] ACE by selecting it then clicking [Edit] and using the Drop down to select [This folder, subdirs and files] then I went back to the NFS client and created more subdirs and files. Then back to the
Windows NFS server and checked the new subdirs and folders and they did Inherit the Windows NFS server ACE! - However the UID/GID of the subdirs and folders remained unchanged, they did not reflect the new "Effective" ownership or group membership.
7. I "believe" because I was using UUUA and working "behind" the UID/GID presentation layer for the NFS client, it did not update that presentation layer. It might do that "if" I were using a Mapping mechanism and mapped UID/GID to Windows User SIDs and
Group SIDs. Windows 2008r2 no longer has a "simple" Mapping server, it does not accept flat text files and requires a Schema extension to Active Directory just to MAP a windows account to a UID/GID.. a lot of overhead. Windows Server 2012 accepts flat text
files like /etc/passwd and /etc/group to perform this function and is next on my list of things to see if that will update the UID/GID based on the Windows ACE entries. Since the Local ACE take precedence "over" Inherited ACEs there could be a problem. The
Inheritance appears to be intended [only] to retain Administrative rights over user created subdirs and files by adding an additional ACE at the time of creation.
8. I did verify from the NFS client side in Linux that "Even though" the UID/GID seem to reflect the local non-root user should not have the ability to traverse or create new files, the "phantom" NFS Server ACEs are in place and do permit the function..
reconciling the "view" with "reality" appears problematic, unless the User Mapping will update "effective" rights and ownership in the "view"
-- John Willis, Facebook: John-Willis, Skype: john.willis7416

Setting up Multicast Routing for Imaging on HP Switches

I've just spent a bit of time getting multicast imaging to work on our
HP ProCurve switched network so I thought I'd post what was necessary
so if anyone else had to look for it then they'd have some help.
You'll need a switch capable of routing such as a 5300 series that is
already routing regualr IP traffic. By default IGMP routing is disabled
so that multicast traffic will not cross VLANs. Here's how to change
that:
Log into the 5300 in Manager mode (aka Admin)
type "config" /goes into config mode
type "ip multicast routing" /sets up IGMP routing
type "router pim" /sets up Protocol Independant Multicast routing
type "vlan *" /where * is a VLAN numeric ID
type "ip igmp" /sets up IGMP routing on that VLAN
type "ip pim" /sets up PIM routing on that VLAN
Repeat those last three steps for all necessary VLANs
type "exit" /to get back out of config mode - you may have to do
that more than once
type "wri mem" to save the config changes
Then go out to any other switches in the network path for multicasts
and login in Manager mode
type "config"
type "vlan *" /where * is VLAN numeric ID
type "ip igmp" /turns on IGMP routing
Repeat those last two steps for all VLANs that need it
type "exit" /to get back out of config mode - you may have to do
that more than once
type "wri mem" to save the config changes
That's it and it meant I went from "Session Master not found" to "New
Image successful". I hope it helps somebody.
Andrew

On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:47:21 GMT, Andrew Ferris wrote:
> I've just spent a bit of time getting multicast imaging to work on our
> HP ProCurve switched network so I thought I'd post what was necessary
> so if anyone else had to look for it then they'd have some help.
Did somebody say coolsolutions?
http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/...mit_a_tip.html
If you have already compiled drivers or have linux.2 please put them on
http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfmo...ect/?zfdimgdrv
Live BootCd and USB Disk from Mike Charles
http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfmod/project/?imagingx
eZie http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfmod/project/?ezie
Marcus Breiden
If you are asked to email me information please change -- to - in my e-mail
address.
The content of this mail is my private and personal opinion.
http://www.edu-magic.net

I just want my tabs to load for the web link they were originally set for. Instead I am getting the last page visited or the tab has been logged out.

''locking as a duplicate of https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/981122''
I have "Show My Home Page" for the Startup option
I have LastPass set to AutoLogin
I have the cookies for the tab sites in the Cookies Exceptions list
Despite all of this, the tabs are "logged out" when I restart Firefox, and sites that have no logins are not opened based on the web address the tab was originally set for.

Type '''about:config''' in the URL and filter
*'''browser.stratup.homepage''' and change the value as the website you need to load.
or
Firefox Menu > Tools > options
*General > Startup > When firefox starts " Show my Home Page"
**Home Page "www.google.com"
Firefox Menu > Tools > options > Privacy > History
*Firefox will: "Use custom settings for history":
*Select: [x] Accept Cookies from sites
**Accept third party cookies: "From Visited"
*Keep until "They Expire"
*Deselect: [ ] "Clear history when Firefox closes"

I have an Airport Extreme as my router and am using time capsule to extend the network in my new house. My ISP is only providing me 4-5 ip addresses and wants me to set up my router to issue out new ip addresses for all my devices.How do I fix this?Help

I have an Airport Extreme as my router and am using time capsule to extend the network in my new house. My ISP is only providing me 4-5 ip addresses and wants me to set up my router to issue out new ip addresses for all my devices.How do I fix this?Help.
They said I need to change my settings to NAT settings. I haven't been able to figure out or find anything. I have also spoken to Apple Support on the phone for hours without being able to figure out how to do this ( i don't think he knew much either lol.) Please help me because I've got about 15-20 devices in my house that require to be connected to the internet and this is just making things ridiculously slow and painful for me.
Thanks!

It is on DHCP & NAT under router mode yet my isp is still the one issuing ip addresses to my devices instead of the router issuing them

My ipod may have crashed while trying to update new os.4. it;s been trying to restore original setting for the next 10 hours without success. what do I do?

My ipod touch4 may have crashed in trying to up date to the new ios. 4.3.4. I have not been successful in attempting to retore back to original setting for the past 10 hours. What do I do next.

Fix iOS Apps Stuck on “Waiting…” During Download & Install
Fix iPhone Apps Stuck "Waiting" During Installation

Transport target group and routes setting for 2 system landscape

Hi!
I have 2 system landscape (DEV with 2 Clients, 100 CUST and 200 TEST and PRD with productvie client 100).
Currently I have the standard TMS configuration for 2 systems (with tranport layers/routes ZDEV and SAP) .
Now I have to set up my TMS settings client specific
(Development in DEV 100 and transport to the DE 200 TEST and PRD 100).
I have created tranport target group /B-DEV/ with both target goals:
DEV 200 and PRD 100.
<b>What are the further settings for transport routes?
I assume, I have to delete the existing routes ZDEV and SAP?
what are the next steps? </b>
Thank you very much
regards

Ok, I have in DEV system:
Client 100 (Customizing)
Client 200 (Test) (it can be considered as replacement of QAS-system, because we only have 2 systems)
PRD system
Client 100 (Productive client)
So we would like to set up the transport management system client specific, in order to develop in DEV 100 to test in DEV 200 and to use the transports in PRD 100.
Thank you very for your help
regards

What's the recommended setting for "Process memory usage" ("process virtual" in UI) for a 64-bit host on a 64-bit OS?

Hi gurus
In resource based throttling, what's the recommended setting for "Process memory usage" ("process virtual" in the resource based throttling tab of the UI) for a 64-bit host
on a 64-bit Windows OS?
According to MS (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee308808(v=bts.10).aspx):
"By default, the
Process memory usage throttling threshold is set to 25. If this value is exceeded and the BizTalk process memory usage is more than 300 MB, a throttling condition may occur. On a 32-bit
server, you can increase the Process memory usage value to 50. On a 64-bit server, you can increase this value to 100. This allows for more memory consumption by the BizTalk process before throttling
occurs."
Does this mean that 100 is the recommended setting for a 64-bit host on a 64-bit Windows?
Thanks
Michael Brandt Lassen

Hi Michael,
Recommended setting is the default setting which is 25 .dot.
If your situation is abnormal and you see message delivery throttling state to “4” when the following performance counters are high or if you expect any of you integration
process could have impact on following counters, then you can consider the suggestion by Microsoft. Don’t change the default setting.
High process memory
Process memory usage (MB)
Process memory usage threshold (MB)
You can see these counters under “BizTalk:MessageAgent”
You can gauge these performance counter and its maximum values if have done any regression/performance testing in your test servers. If you have seen these counters having
high values and causing throttling, then you can update the Process memory usage.
Or unexpectedly you’re process high throughput messages in production which is causing these counters to go high and cause throttling, then up can update the Process memory
usage.
The above two cases where I know my expected process usage (by doing performance testing) or suddenly my production server processing has gone high due to unexpected business
hike (or any reasons) which caused throttling, then do changes to default throttling setting.
Just changing the default setting without actual reason could have adverse effect where you end up allocating
more processing capacities but the actual message processing message usage ever is low means you end up investing in underutilised resources.
Regards,
M.R.Ashwin Prabhu
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

OSPF down-bit set for a route originated as static?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for