Overall Result Row is not the Sum of Individual Values!

I am frustrated with a weird problem. I have an expense report in which Expense1 is shown a value of 8,126. If I drilldown by company code, the sum of the company codes is 8,235, but the "Overall Result" row is showing 8,126.
I tried drilling down by GL accounts, cost centers, profit centers, material and even currency. For all of these drilldowns the "Overall Result" row is 8,126 but the individual values sum out to be 8,235.
First I thought it could be "Zero Suppression" that is hiding some values from the display. But "Zero Suppression" was not active at all. I have checked the LISTCUBE and saw that the Expense1 should be 8,235 and not 8,126. The key figure properties "Calculate Result As" and "Calculate Single Values As" are set to "Nothing Defined" and "Use Default Direction". But still for some strange reason, the "Overall Result" row is different than the sum of individual rows. It's driving me crazy as I have ran out of ideas to figure out what's happening. Could someone help me with this? I would appreciate any input with points!

Hi,
Remove the 'Suppress Zero rows/columns' from the query definition and then check the values.
Column A might have value, but for the same row column B might have zero, hence the row was not shown in the result set, but the overall result will include all such values as well, even thought it was not shown in the result set.
HTH,
regards,
Nataraj.

Similar Messages

Overall results row - how not to show some columns

Dear Experts
I have set results rows enabled at a certain characteristic level.
So, at the rows level, the results row is showing.
But at the right-hand-side results columns, some of the keyfigure columns should not be displayed , for example, price should not be summed.
How can this be achieved using a query only?
regards
Pascal

HI,
As i dont have your report layout based on my assumptions i understand that you have put one char in rows column above the strucutre and thats why you are getting result in rows and column as well.
Now you need to hide the column result which indeed seems no to me i tried same on my system but i can only make the value and result blank but cannot hide the complete result column.
Please correct me if my understanding is worng or your requirement in something differnent.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
AL

How to display Average, not Sum, in the "Overall Result" row of a report?

Every report I look at or execute that has an Overall Result row always shows a total(sum) of all the cells in the column. I recently came across one that shows the average of all the cells in the column and after looking at the query in BEx Query Designer 7.0 and BEx Analyzer 7.0 I cannot seem to find out where to set this. All of the Key Figures are listed as "Nothing Defined" in the Calculations tab which is exactly what they should be, but where can I set that yellow-highlighted Overall Result row to calculate an average, not a sum?
Example can be found in this picture:
http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/6757/pic1yp.jpg
Thanks for the help!

My issue was that I was setting my KF's to 'Calculate Result As: Average' within the Query View that I was editing but the change was not showing on my screen when I have that View opened within the Analyzer. Infact, it still is showing totals. But when I execute my Web Template that references this Query View, the graph does display the result row using Averages. Seems to just be a visibility bug, but it is now working.
Thanks for the reminder about that property KP,
Scott

Problem in positioning of the Overall Result Row when using a hierarchy

Hello All,
i've built a query on a hierarchy and i want the 'Overall Result' to be displayed at the bottom.
I've made the following setting in the Query Designer
Query Properties -> Display -> Results Position -> Bottom/Right
but still, the 'Overall Result' is displayed at the top of the result rows.
Could some one please tell me if this is how the functionality is expected to work when a hierarchy is used for display ?
We are on BW3.1 SP 9
Best Regards,
Sanjay

Hi Roberto,
could you please let me know if the following analysis of mine is correct.
The Overall Result will be dispalyed at the top if the 'Position of Lower-Level Nodes' is set to 'Down'(default setting) in the Hierarchy Properties of
the characteristic. If the 'Overall Result' is required to be at the bottom then 'Position of Lower-Level Nodes' has to be set to 'Up'. It is not possible to display the Overall Result at the bottom with the 'Position of Lower-Level Nodes' set to 'Down'
Will greatly appreciate your help !
Best Regards,
Sanjay

Query with a condition - Overall results row displays incorrect value

Hi All,
I have a bw query with top 40 conditions. However, The Overall Result Row Figures Do Not Equal The Sum of the Column Rows.
Although the top condition is activated, the overall result still displays the overall result of the whole report.
I have 3 columns in the report
Selected Period
Prior Period and
Variance
The formula for variance is (Selected Period/Prior Period)-1.
Does anyone have an idea to fix this?
Thank you so much in advance.
Have a great day!

Hi Gaurav,
Thank you so much for your reply, however this does not solve fully the issue.
Changing the properties to "Summation" will indeed provide me with the correct sum for the "selected period" and "Prior Period." However what I need in the Overall Result Row for the "Variance" column is not the total but instead the value when the total of Selected Period is divided by Prior Period then minus 1.
Overall Variance = (Overall Selected Period/Overall Prior Period)-1
Do you know a way to make this possible.
Thank you so much.

Query with a condition - Overall results row is wrong

Hello,
I have a query that uses a condition. The query gives me the top 10 brands according to the Net Sales. The query itself runs fine. I just noticed however that the Overall Result row isn't giving me the correct number.
For example:
BRAND NETSALES MARGIN %
Brand1 $100 25%
Brand2 $60 10%
Brand3 $20 15%
OVERALL RESULT $210 2%
As you can see it does not add up or average correctly. This query has no macros or anything, it only uses a condition.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Nick

A workaround I have found is the manual directions in this OSS note: 572910
Anyone have any follow up?
Thanks.
Nick

Result row is not showing expected result

Dear All ,
I have below requirement to generate mix variance
PY Mix
PY Mix Diff
PY Mix
Val Gr -
0.00
0.00
1,015.6823529
1,015.68
0.00
0.00
52,486.5048653
52,486.50
0.00
0.00
2,836.1166667
2,836.12
0.00
0.00
45,582.8437071
45,582.84
Result
0.00
3,09,668.66
-2,07,747.5092285
1,01,921.15
Result in Bex
Expected Result
PY Mix L- Used No definition in   Result
Val Gr -    Used Sum in result
PY Mix Diff = Val Gr - PY Mix
But above formula is not working for Result row ??
expected 3,09,668.66 but showing 0.00
Any ideas to crack this .
All your valuable inputs are highly appreciated .
Regards ,
Hari

Dear Suman
Thank you so much for your reply .
PY Mix and Val Gr KFs both key figures has got same definition(Same formula ).So i cant use Summation for both KYF in Exp Agge
For Val Gr   -Result Row should be sum of values in Column , i have maintained no settings .And showing value as expected
Val Gr -(CKF)
1,015.68
52,486.50
2,836.12
45,582.84
1,01,921.15 -Result (Sum along columns)
For PY Mix - Result Row should be as per formula defined , i have maintained summation in Exp aggregation .And showing value as expected
PY Mix -(CKF)
1,015.68
52,486.50
2,836.12
45,582.84
-2,07,747.50-Result (According to formula used )
But When i use these to kyf in another formula Result row are not calculating as per Expectation
PY MIX DIFF = Val Gr - PY Mix
                          3,09,668.66 (expected )
                        = 0 (but final result )
any other inputs to make it
Regards ,
Hari

The overall result shows * instead of the value

Dear Experts,
In my report i've qty in columns and item in rows. The qty is in all Ea. (Each). So when i run the report i thought all the noumber would be added for qty and displayed in the overall result.
But in the overall result it shows a * . However in the formula bar in excel it displays a number like 44000.
I tried using nodim() and it worked, but my question is since the qty is in all Ea.'s shouldnt it add up the value to be displayed in the overall result.
Can someone shed some light.
Thank you...

No Jr., i dont any record with a blank value.
Wond, i agree with you. I thought i should see the total since all the items are in Ea.
Is there anything else i can check.

Table Interface - Overall Results Row

Can anyone tell me if it is possible to manipulate the contents of the Overall Results Row calculated by OLAP using a Table Interface?

Hi,
Go through this Help Document on Table Interface. U will get a clear idea.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/a2/06a83a4bd5a27ae10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
check these links as well....
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/49dfeb90-0201-0010-a1a2-9d7a7ca1a238
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f0aca990-0201-0010-0380-f3aac4127a57
hope this helps....

I have a dynamic table that calculates the sum of all rows, no issue. I'm struggling with pulling out a subtotal though. I would like to have a check box in each row that flags those rows and gives the sum of their total. Any help would be greatly app

I have a dynamic table that calculates the sum of all rows, no issue. I'm struggling with pulling out a subtotal though. I would like to have a check box in each row that flags those rows and gives the sum of their total. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Here's something I threw together rq. The script is in the change event for the checkbox in the table. (Of course, you'll have to modify it to suit the names of your fields.)
var rows = xfa.resolveNodes("tblAmounts.Row1[*]");
var subtotal=0;
for (i=0; i<rows.length; i++) if (rows.item(i).cbAdd.rawValue == 1) subtotal = subtotal + rows.item(i).nfAmount.rawValue;
nfSubtotal.rawVlaue=subtotal;

Suppressing a line if the sum of a value = 0 in a group footer

How do i suppress a line if the sum of a value = 0 in a group footer
I have tried this this formula in the section expert - Sum ({RM_INV.QUANTITY}) = 0
will not work.

Hi Dana,
The sum function needs to include the group you have your total in like:
Sum ({table.FIELD1}, {RM_INV.QUANTITY}) = 0
{table.FIELD1} would be the field you are grouping on. Your formula was summing the grand total for RM_INV.QUANTITY.
Thanks,
Brian

Result row does not hide value

Hi all,
I have some calculated key figures that are using formula variables to get dates to do calculations on.
Since summing up date values does not lead to anything meaningful, I selected the 'Hide' value in the 'Calculate results as...' section.
However, the results row is still showing an 'X' in this column when I run the query.
I have one calculated key figure for a date using this same method (formula variable from an infoobject) and the result row is hidden correctly.
Does anyone have any idea on why the result row would still display even though it supposed to be hidden?
Thanks in advance.

result rows needs need to be suppressed for characteristic properties.
in query designer , click on characteristics in your reports ( i.e rows ) goto display property supress the result rows..

How do you select n rows and not the whole table

Hi
I would like to only select the first 50 rows from a table and not the entire table. how do i accomplish this
Thanks

Sayeed's example will work great if you don't care which 50 rows you get back. If you do, you can use an inline view to sort them first and get back a ranked result set:
select *
from (select whatever
from table
order by key desc
where rownum <= 50

BPC 7.5 MS Drill Down works on one dimension in rows but not the other

Good day,
Working in BPC 7.5 MS. I have a piped report with 3 dimensions in rows. Members in the first dimension are hard-coded in the expand range. The second dimension is a combination of SELF and DEP members. The third is set to SELF. In our original AppSet, I can double-click drill down on both the second and third dimensions without issue.
I've re-created this report in a new AppSet (same BPC version). All settings are essentially identical (I've double and triple checked). The drill down works on the second dimension, but not the third. I've run out of places to look to find the problem. Any thoughts?
Thanks in advance.
Kim

It took a while but I finally found some quiet time to re-visit this issue. Thank you for the suggestions above. Ultimately I verified that the hierarchy, member selection and tables were all ok.
My next step was to create a new EVDRE with the same members and slowly factor in the piping, membersets, etc. Drill down worked appropriately. So that told me something else was at work.
Turns out the problem was with one of the 'display' columns to the right of the row key range. These columns use formulas to display a triangle if the member isn't calc, thus giving the end user a visual clue that you can drill down on the member. Long story short, BPC just didn't like that formula. A minor change (along with some conditional formatting to replace the piece of formula that was removed) eliminated the problem. Drill down is now working.

Coloring JTable rows depending on the actual and previous value

I need to change the background of the entire row of a JTable, but with the condintion of checking the value (Integer) in the column 0 of each row.
I the actual value is equal to previous value I keep the same color (any color) if it is different I must change the color (to any other color).
Any ideas how I could do that? I suppose I cant use CellRenderer because the Table is already full, so I was thinking about making a looping thru the table and chaning the background colors, but I have no idea how to do that.
So far I have this code:
int totalRows = modProdutos.getRowCount();
int totalCols = modProdutos.getColumnCount();
System.out.println("Total rows: " + totalRows);
TableColumnModel tcm = tbProdutos.getColumnModel();
DefaultTableModel modelo = (DefaultTableModel) tbProdutos.getModel();
if (totalRows > 0) {
 int numeroOSAntes = (Integer) tbProdutos.getValueAt(0, 0);
 for (int i = 0; i < totalRows; i++) {
 int numeroOS = (Integer) tbProdutos.getValueAt(i, 0);
 if (numeroOS == numeroOSAntes) {
 // Paint the background with the same color (any color)
 System.out.println("Same Color: " + numeroOSAntes + " - " + numeroOS);
 } else {
 // Paint the background with a different color (any other color)
 System.out.println("Different color: " + numeroOSAntes + " - " + numeroOS);
 // keep the previous control number
 numeroOSAntes = numeroOS;
}

 jTable1 = new JTable(0,4){
 @Override
 public Component prepareRenderer(TableCellRenderer renderer, int row, int column) {
 Component c = super.prepareRenderer(renderer, row, column);
 c.setBackground(Color.YELLOW);
 boolean yellow = true;
 for (int i = 1; i <= row; i++) {
 if(!getValueAt(i,0).toString().equals(getValueAt(i-1,0).toString())){
 yellow = !yellow;
 if(!yellow){
 c.setBackground(Color.WHITE);
 return c;
 model = (DefaultTableModel)jTable1.getModel();
 model.addTableModelListener(new TableModelListener() {
 public void tableChanged(TableModelEvent e) {
 jTable1.repaint();
 });

Overall Result Row is not the Sum of Individual Values!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for