OVM 3.0.1 - directory structure & adding resources

Afternoon everyone,
I've got OVM 3.0.1 up and running, so far so good.
I had a question about the repository directory structure. If this has been addressed already, my apologies.
In OVM 2.x, it was possible to copy over a variety of data (.iso's, .img's, templates, etc.) directly into the seed, iso and running pools on OVS and then register them through OVM. Is there a way to do this in OVM/OVS 3.0.1? Is it a matter of getting the correct syntax in the 'download location' dialog box that refers to the OVS 3.0.1 box? Or do you need a remote staging resource set up in order to import data?
Best regards,
J.

861743 wrote:
In OVM 2.x, it was possible to copy over a variety of data (.iso's, .img's, templates, etc.) directly into the seed, iso and running pools on OVS and then register them through OVM. Is there a way to do this in OVM/OVS 3.0.1? Is it a matter of getting the correct syntax in the 'download location' dialog box that refers to the OVS 3.0.1 box? Or do you need a remote staging resource set up in order to import data?You need a remote server to import data. This can be the Oracle VM Manager machine itself, as long as you can access it via http/https from the Oracle VM Servers (as the import happens on the Oracle VM Server machines). Just install Apache on your VM Manager machine and stash your templates/assemblies in /var/www/html.

Similar Messages

I have copied many photo's from another laptop to my Mac. The older photo's are in directories with names that help me select what I need to view. I would like to have all my imported new photo's also bee added to the directory structure I have in Finder

I have copied many photo's from another laptop to my Mac. The older photo's are in directories with names that help me select what I need to view. I would like to have all my imported new photo's also bee added to the directory structure I have in Finder but my new photo's are all in iPhoto. I want to use directories for storing and iPhoto for viewing. Is this possible or do I need to have all my photo's in iPhoto??
Mitch

iPhoto is not a Photo Viewer. It's a Photo Manager and designed for looking after the files while you organise the Photos. It really works much better if you let it manage those files. If you use iPhoto you never go near those files because iPhoto is your start point for anything you want to do with your Photos - the point of the pplication.
You can run iPhoto in Referenced mode, where it does not copy the files to the Library, but I caution you that you are making life a lot more difficult for yourself by doing that.
How to, and some comments on why you shouldn't, are in this thread
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3062728?tstart=0
Regards
TD

Organize iTunes file list by Directory Structure instead of artist/album?

Hello, I have searched for different audio players for os x which might have this feature but so far have had no luck. What I'm looking for is a feature similar to that of foobar2000 for win32 where I can organize my music by directory structure without the iTunes automatic organization by artist/album. Is there a way I can accomplish this in iTunes with some sort of xml config or hidden options? Thanks.

You don't have to have iTunes move music around on your hard drive (Preferences>Advanced>General, uncheck Keep iTunes Music folder organized and Copy files to iTunes Music folder when adding to library) but I suspect that's not what you're asking. You can't automatically view music from within iTunes by directory structure. iTunes organizes by ID3 tags ("mp3 tags"). You could, I suppose, spend a lot of time replicating your directory structure by using folders and playlists within iTunes but you'd probably have to do it all by hand.
You could check out Doug's Scripts to see if there are some scripts that might help.
http://dougscripts.com/itunes/index.php

Directory structure mirroring

I have my mp3:s neatly organized in a directory structure on
my disk. There's where I'd like to add and remove albums,
and would like the itunes music library to automatically
update when I make changes.
I.e. if I add albums on my disk, I'd like them to appear in itunes (and on the ipod when syncing).
And if I remove albums from my disk I'd like them to
automatically disappear form itunes and the ipod.
Can I make Itunes work like this? I dont like to make all
changes twice, i.e. deleting both from the disk and then in
itunes. This gets especially irritating when moving many
albums.
Ideas? Cheers / Tom
Dell XPS PC Windows XP Pro

You need to create a form and assign it to the reconciliation process. In the form, you need waveset.organization set to where you want the user objects placed. By default, waveset.organization is set to just "Top". You can get the DN, parse it into a list and write the xml code to use the list to place each in a different virtual organization.
Start off simple, say create a container called Top:newusers. Take a copy of Empty Form and save it as orgEmpty Form or something. Define a field waveset.organization and just set its value to "Top:newusers". Then in the resource, set the reconciliation form to your new form.
Try this, once you see new ids show up in Top:newusers, you then can enhance the logic to be more sophisticated in placing objects. That is, parse the DN into a list and walk the list for a IDM waveset.organization value.
BTW, a good question to ask prospective IDM so called experts. Of 8 or so, I only met one that new how to do this efficiently.

Directory structure support and sluggish touch screen

I bought a Zen X Fi2. My expectations were high since I already had a creative some years ago. (I was quite pleased with the performance and sound quality etc)
However I am a bit dissapointed with Zen XFi2- The touch screen is not very successful. The scroll function does not work at a satisfactory level and sometimes (when I want to scroll), it makes a "selection" rather than "scrolling".
Also it does not support browsing with directory structure. For those people (like me) who are quite used to drag and drop type of copying for mp3 files, it is really a pain to re arrange all the songs for ID3 tag information.
I believe these two issues are software issues and can be improved by new firmware upgrade.
I also want to take this opportunity to tell that the software (interface software) that comes with the device is totally crap- I have never seen a software that tries to control the user rather than the user controlling the software. An ideal interface software for such a device should be the one which allows user to choose the songs from any directory, drag and drop into the device.
I was going to return my Zen however after playing around for a few days, I somewhat get used to its sluggish touch screen behaviour and accepted ID3 tag browsing (which still gives me a lot of problem) so right now I am gonna keep it.
May be software developpers can work on touch screen improvement, adding the support for directory structure browsing (as well as ID3 tag browser) and work on interface software a bit more ?
Thanks
Best Regards

This is indeed interesting because when you say "I don't have the problems you mentioned" I believe you also refer to the sensitivity of the touch screen. This makes me ask the question if my item has some problems. Since I do not have any means of cross checking this (apparently there is no other Zen XFi2 around me) may be I should ask you this question: "When you want to browse among albums for example, you wipe your finger across the screen so the screen rolls down; can you have it fluently like in an IPOD touch?- or does it not recognize immediately and you have to do it again sometimes?"
As for the volume button- I do indeed agree. For devices like this one; having physical buttons for at least volume, mute, stop/pause is a "must"! Choosing, browsing or starting a song is not a big deal however muting, stopping or changing the volume may be needed instantly from time to time. It is very unpractical to browse for volume, find it and adjust it!
Also may I add that for such a nice device, there should be a remote control on the headphone/earphone cable and should employ at least stop/play/mute/volume/forward/reverse buttons. I mean think about it for a while- why would you want to take use this device- apparently not to watch movies at home! You take it with you and listen to music, while cycling, jogging, skiing, roller blading etc. It is so difficult taking out the device from your pocket, browsing for volume button and turning up and down the volume (while cycling for example!) or skipping to next song with one touch!
Cheers

Changing directory structure & song file locations: iTunes query

I have an external hard-drive which I have loaded with thousands of songs over the years but have never really used it. Now, I want to organise my iTunes songs but my limited knowledge has brought me to a stop... Please help!
On the external HDD, songs are located all over the place - the directory structure is bad - and I want to simplify it under a new structure. Some songs are also on my iMac's HDD which I also want to centralise on the external HDD. What is the best way to do this?
Also, I don't have any play lists organised so I don't mind if I loose the library information and start again UNLESS the library information also includes SONG information (artist, title, etc.). Could it be a good idea, then, that I simply start again? Specifically:
1. Can I just use Finder to move files around and change the directory structure on the external HDD?
2. Can I start from scratch and copy all the music files onto a new external HDD with the new, simple directory structure I want and then re-point iTunes using the "iTunes media folder location" tab? Will I lose all the song file information?
3. What do I do with the iTunes library? Is it best to "reset" the library somehow or should I do all of this moving using iTunes and therefore avoiding dealing with the library file?
Thanks!!!

Driggs wrote:
1. Can I just use Finder to move files around and change the directory structure on the external HDD?
you could use finder, but it would be far better if you'd let iTunes handle the moving and organizing.
2. Can I start from scratch and copy all the music files onto a new external HDD with the new, simple directory structure I want and then re-point iTunes using the "iTunes media folder location" tab? Will I lose all the song file information?
if you want to start from scratch, i would leave the files where they currently are. again, let iTunes handle it (see below).
3. What do I do with the iTunes library? Is it best to "reset" the library somehow or should I do all of this moving using iTunes and therefore avoiding dealing with the library file?
i would start over. launch iTunes with the option key pressed. click on +create library+. in iTunes, go preferences > advanced and point iTunes to the desired location (i.e. your external drive). in the same tab, disable +copy files to iTunes media folder when adding to library+ temporarily.
now start adding content (file > add to library). when done, go back to preferences > advanced and re-enable +copy files to iTunes media folder when adding to library+. next, go file > library > organize library and select both options like so
hit ok. iTunes will now move files as necessary and organize them. when finished, your iTunes music folder on the external drive will look like this
none of your music files will be renamed. artwork you added manually will be retained, however, artwork that came with purchases from the iTunes store may be lost. that can easily be added later on though.
post back if you need further advice.
good luck !

How to force Jdeveloper to preserve existing sources directory structure?

Hi all,
I have JDeveloper 9.0.3.4 which I have to use.
I tried to import to project from existing sources and I tried to keep existing sources
directory structure by selection option "Scan source paths to determine project contents" which should (according to documentation) preserve existing directory structure and show it in the Navigator.
But instead I get always (Jdev default?) directory structure:
Sources
HTML Sources
Miscelaneous Files
I changed default settings for Input path in project settings and for default project settings but still I get this Jdev structure.
Is there a way to force JDeveloper to preserve the directory structure of sources it imports from?
Many thanks,
Mile

I'd like to be able to specify the default project directory structure in 10g as well. For example I would like to have under the project root:
build.xml
src\
generatedsrc\
config\
resources\
build\
deploy\
Generating an ant build.xml using the wizard should also take into account the directory structure being used by the JDeveloper project build. I don't see why I should have to modify the build.xml file at all.

Additional directory structure on the ROM portion of a disc?

Can I write an additional directory structure on the ROM portion of a disc?
I want directory "A" on the root level of the disc and directory "1", "2", and "3" within directory "A".
There would be various pdf's in the 1, 2, and 3 directories.

Yup!
This is called 'ROM Data'. You can add it from inside DVDSP but it often catches folks out in the way it works.
Basically, get your folder with the sub folders inside it, and the PDFs inside each subfolder. Make sure this is somewhere easy to find, like on your desktop. Name the parent folder something that your viewers will appreciate (like ROM, or "Additional Files' or 'MORE' or something like that).
At this point it is tempting to simply go to the property inspector and point the DVD-ROM settings at that 'parent' folder. However, this isn't what you do if you want to keep the folder structure intact.
Take your parent folder and put it (and all subfolders) into another folder. Now, go to DVDSP and click on the disc icon in the outline view, then look in the property inspector. On the first tab (General settings) you'll see the DVD-ROM settings towards the bottom. Check the 'Content' box and browse for the final folder you added everything to (the one with the parent folder and sub folders inside it).
When DVDSP builds your disc it will look inside this folder and put everything it finds at the root level of your disc, maintaining the folder structure. You will end up with your 'ROM' folder and three subfolders with PDFs inside it when the disc is created.
If you don't do the last step and you simply point to your 'ROM' folder, then you'll get three folders at the root level of the disc, and not the one single folder you wanted.

Directory Structures

Hi,
This is about the directory structures to use for development and
deployment under weblogic. By default, as you all know, weblogic comes with
a server called "myserver" whose directory strcuture has within it the
public_html, serverclasses, servletclasses and clientclasses directories,
with the jar files for the examples all residing in the myserver directory.
The general tendency for developers is to use simply use that very structure
as is. I think that may prove to be unwieldy during deployment (especially
when there will be multiple servers running on multiple machines, etc.) as
well as during development (integrating with source code control, etc.)
Here are my questions:
1) How have people weblogic developers organized their directory structures
for deployment? It seems to me that it would make sense to have a directory
structure that has at least a "lib" directory under which the jar files were
put, a "log" directory for log files, a "cert" directory for certificates,
etc.
2) In addition, is there an absloute need for the myserver directory to sit
under the weblogic tree? I would think it would make sense to not have the
deployment directory structures not tied to the weblogic installation's
location.
3) If there are multiple servers that will be deployed (each instantiating
its own set of services that are implemented as session and entity EJBs),
does one introduce an entire directory structure for each server or have a
common directory structure with each server having its own properties file ?
Currently, I have it setup so that each server that is introduced, e.g.,
pricing servers, fulfillment servers, etc. has its own properties file and
that the entire directory tree sits separate from the weblogic installation,
to facilitate tight integration with source code control. Having resolved
the regular issues that arise with the CLASSPATH, ClassCastExceptions, etc.,
we're up and running, but I have had a tough time convincing my developers
about the merits of deviating from the standard development tree stcucture.
Do people have any opinions about this, and are there any experiences they
can share with me? I'd be more than willing to to change course based on
others' experiences.
Sorry for the long-winded message.
TIA,
Prashanth

Prashanth Nandavanam wrote:
>
Hi,
This is about the directory structures to use for development and
deployment under weblogic. By default, as you all know, weblogic comes with
a server called "myserver" whose directory strcuture has within it the
public_html, serverclasses, servletclasses and clientclasses directories,
with the jar files for the examples all residing in the myserver directory.
The general tendency for developers is to use simply use that very structure
as is. I think that may prove to be unwieldy during deployment (especially
when there will be multiple servers running on multiple machines, etc.) as
well as during development (integrating with source code control, etc.)
Here are my questions:
1) How have people weblogic developers organized their directory structures
for deployment? It seems to me that it would make sense to have a directory
structure that has at least a "lib" directory under which the jar files were
put, a "log" directory for log files, a "cert" directory for certificates,
etc.That's how I'd do it. I think that the locations of all the
resources you need are configurable. If they're not, let us know.
2) In addition, is there an absloute need for the myserver directory to sit
under the weblogic tree? I would think it would make sense to not have the
deployment directory structures not tied to the weblogic installation's
location.No, it can be anywhere you like. Make sure you adjust the security
policy
file so Java 2 will let the server access your classes.
3) If there are multiple servers that will be deployed (each instantiating
its own set of services that are implemented as session and entity EJBs),
does one introduce an entire directory structure for each server or have a
common directory structure with each server having its own properties file ?
Currently, I have it setup so that each server that is introduced, e.g.,
pricing servers, fulfillment servers, etc. has its own properties file and
that the entire directory tree sits separate from the weblogic installation,
to facilitate tight integration with source code control. Having resolved
the regular issues that arise with the CLASSPATH, ClassCastExceptions, etc.,
we're up and running, but I have had a tough time convincing my developers
about the merits of deviating from the standard development tree stcucture.The "standard" directory tree exists only for the purpose of running
the examples that are shipped with WLS. The WebLogic development
team does exactly what you propose to do, and for the reasons you
state: to keep our deployment configuration under source control in a
location that keeps it separate from the examples support in myserver
and to make it easy to re-install the server without disturbing our
configuration files. We routinely run WebLogic Server from a
configuration
that completely ignores the WEBLOGICHOME/myserver directory.
Do people have any opinions about this, and are there any experiences they
can share with me? I'd be more than willing to to change course based on
others' experiences.
Sorry for the long-winded message.
TIA,
Prashanth--
Chuck Karish BEA Systems
(415) 402-7692 http://www.bea.com/

Scenebuilder not seeing controller in Maven directory structure

I'm using maven for my javafx project, I used the javafx maven plugin @ https://github.com/zonski/javafx-maven-plugin/wiki. Everything was created correctly with a typical maven directory structure, the fxml file was created in the resources\fxml folder. When I edit the fxml file Scenebuilder will not see my controller, I have set the <?scenebuilder-classpath-element /> fxml element to the path of the controller source and the controller still cannot be seen by Scenebuilder. I have performed a build and then changed the same element to the generated jar and it still does not work.
So as a work around I keep the fxml file in the same folder as the controller source. I've read that the scenebuilder-classpath-element is used to resolve imports for user written controls, as a suggestion for a Scenebuilder enhancement it would be nice to have the classpath element also used for the declared controller.

Makes sense.
I created http://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/DTL-5573 to track that proposal.
Thanks for the suggestion.

Fetching directory structure

Hi,
Along with .jar files I like to fetch other resources like help (.html) and configuration (.xml) files. Actually, I would love to deploy a whole directory structure in the client machine. What is the most efficient way to do it?
Please advice with a sample .jnlp file.

please google..
http://www.exforsys.com/tutorials/websphere/websphere-v5.0-workbench-basics-create-j2ee-projects.html
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wpfhelp/v6r1m2/index.jsp?topic=/com.bowstreet.designer.doc/designer/c_devenv_dir_structure.htm

J2EE Enterprise App Directory Structure

Can anyone point me to a resource that descibes the recomended development directory structure for a J2EE app with EJB? MyEclipse create three directories:
J2EEAppName
J2EEAppNameEJB
J2EEAppNameWeb
But I don't know where to put the shared classes, etc. I want to do it right.. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Paul

For anyone else looking for an answer to the recommended directory structure...
See this link:
http://java.sun.com/blueprints/code/projectconventions.html

Class reload for split directory structure

I have tried to use the split directory structure in WL 8.1. I have a enterprise
application with 2 EJB modules and 2 WEB modules. I have tried to change one session
bean by just adding a logging statement and then use wlcompile to compile it.
Do I necessary call wldeploy to redeploy it? Or, will WebLogic automatically reload
the class file? Calling redeploy is so slow to me (about 3 minutes). Thus I want
to check if WL can just reload the class automatically.

Hudson Wong wrote:
I have tried to use the split directory structure in WL 8.1. I have a enterprise
application with 2 EJB modules and 2 WEB modules. I have tried to change one session
bean by just adding a logging statement and then use wlcompile to compile it.
Do I necessary call wldeploy to redeploy it? Yes
Or, will WebLogic automatically reload the class file? No, by default it load the EJB in the application classloader, and
everytning in the classloader must change for it to be visible.
Calling redeploy is so slow to me (about 3 minutes). Thus I want
to check if WL can just reload the class automatically.There is a bit of an advanced way in WLS 8.1 to get this to work.
In your weblogic-ejb-jar.xml, you need to set
<enable-bean-class-redeploy>True</enable-bean-class-redeploy>
This tells WLS to load the bean impl class in a sub classloader
then in weblogic.Deployer you have to specify the bean class that changed.
weblogic.Deployer -name myapp -redeploy myEJB/com/foo/MyEJB.class
That works as long as you only make changes to the bean class itself.
-- Rob

Best way to import a directory structure

I have been using iTunes on my new Mac to download stuff from the iTunes Store. I'd like to start using it to play music from my PC's archives.
iTunes seems to organize its display based on metadata in its own files, gleaned from the ID3 tags. It seems to ignore the directory and filename.
The organization method I've followed to this point on the PC is the exact opposite - all music is organized by directory and filename. ID3 tags are used in most cases, but they are not correct across the board. A slim majority are totally correct and ready for importation.
The library is about 10k songs large, so manual retagging is out of the question. Importing the directories as-is leads only to extreme frustration.
Can anyone recommend a utility for retagging files automatically based on directory and filename info?
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.

Chris CA wrote:
The organization method I've followed to this point on the PC is the exact opposite - all music is organized by directory and filename.
Actually, that's exactly how iTunes does it.
Artist, Album, Song name are Artist directoy, Album directory, song name is filename.
True, that is how iTunes organizes music on the filesystem. My point is that iTunes keys its library database on ID3 tags, not pathname. In other words, I cannot organize my library by directory and filename. (With the intent of updating their tags, honest)
Unless my impression is wrong, I must tag all files correctly before adding them to iTunes, to prevent incorrectly named tracks in the library.
What are your directory and file names?
See this script -> Tags Mirror Artist-Album-Filename
"This script copies the names of the Artist folder, Album folder and filename of the selected tracks to each track's artist, album and song name tags, respectively. Your files and folders must be arranged in this format:
Artist folder:Album folder:filename.xxx"
Or this one...
Filenames to Song Names
This script will rename the selected tracks in iTunes with their filenames (minus the extension)."
This is great stuff. Thank you for pointing me at this site. I'm sure I will need to roll my own script as my directory structure is different than what these scripts appear to address. Ah well, it's a good opportunity to learn AppleScript.
Fwiw, generally my convention has been:
[MusicRoot]/Genre/Artist - TrackName.ext (for one-off tracks)
[MusicRoot]/Genre/Artist - Album/Artist - Album - TrackNum - TrackName.ext
[MusicRoot]/Compilations/Album/Album - TrackNum - Artist - TrackName.ext
Thank you!
-p

What is the N900 directory structure?

I have updated to the latest version of maemo and installed a few apps and added some music.
When I clicked on the Ovi maps icon on the front screen, it never exited from the "Looking for GPS" message, so I exited via X.
After, all my files (music, docs) and subdirectories were gone, and the entire file structure visible via File Manager in PC-Suite was only the folder "cities" with some subfolders in it.
I would like to add music, etc. back in without having to drastically re-install the OS or something. I did not yet back it up.
Can anyone give a screen shot of the directory structure visible in PC-suite File Manager so that I can reconstruct it?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

if you go in to settings, time and date and select the auto update option, then when you put the battery back in just accept the time and date it defaults to and it will correct it for you

OVM 3.0.1 - directory structure & adding resources

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for