Part creation after MIGO

Hi,
I have posted a material document with out part-1 updation.
Is it possible to do part-1 after goods receipt
one thing i know is that we can cancel GR and again we can do GR with Part-1 updation
Is there any another solution
regards
Subhash

Dear,
While doing Part-1 after GR to which document i have to refer Purrchase order or goods receipt.
If i refer to the purchase order,it giving as "Document 1051000348 does not contain any selectable items".
Wheras if am doing with reference to GR Excise value are not flowing
Regards
Subhash

Similar Messages

TR creation after MIGO

Hi Experts,
Is there a way to control the number of TR generated by MIGO (on Delivery Number)?
For example, if one delivery contains multi-POs, e.g. three, after MIGO, I get three TRs respectively. (Even if I configure the system to let source BIN use material document number instead of PO number.) The fact is, in order to do further opertions, I need to combine all requirements and generate only one TR, and consequently, one TO.
Please help.

Hi,
In MIGO screen, if u click on WM tab in the item details then u can find the " No Transfer Requirement "
check box. This indicates that :
you can use to ensure that for this particular document no transfer requirements will be generated, although this is normally the case.
If you do not want to have a transfer requirement created, enter X here.
And also, concentrate on the following screen.
path: SPRO->Logistics Execution->warehouse management->Activities->Transfers->Define movement types.
select movement type:101 against ur warehouse number, click enter then u can find the " Manual creation of Transfer requirements are allowed" check box under Transfer requirements heading.
try with this, u can find a solution.

MIRO creation after MIGO

Dear Gurus,
I have a specific requirement pertaining to MIRO. Normally we do MIGO & then come to MIRO & do invoice postings.
My requirement is when MIGO is done system has to automatically create MIRO & keep it in hold position. Is it possible in SAP to create MIRO automatically based on MIGO creation.
Please guide me this regard.

Hi,
go for ERS follow the steps:-
in vendor master tcode xk02
mark the check box AUTO EVAL. AND SUBSEQUENT SETTLEMENT.
mark the check box GR BASED IV
tcode me11
check NO ERS should not be marked in purchasing data 1 screen
tcode me21n
unmark the invoice reciept check box and mark the gr based ive check box
go to tcode MRRL
and execute
and for more details check this link.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20c57f75-d26f-2910-c3aa-dee124530121
Reward points if helpful,
Regards,
Archit

Inspection Lot Creation after GR

Dear PP/QM Masters,
I have question regarding inspection lot creation after goods receipt.
There will be GR once at the end of the shift with batch number. As batch generated during shift will be different, there will be multiple GR entry. But for every material only one result recording per shift is required and not for all batches generated. So, how to avoid creation of so many inspection lot? Automatic Inspection lot creation is required hence no question of manual creation of inspection lot.
I checked function module QAPP_CUST_IP_CREATE for inspection point functionality but its description You can use the available function module to generate inspection points for the inspection during production already when the inspection lot is created. Can I use function module QAPP_CUST_IP_CREATE for restricting creation of inspection lot after GR?
Request all Masters to help me in solving this.
Thanks and regards,
Devang

Dear All,
First of all thanks a lot for your response.
I checked Control Inspection Lot setting but even that can not solve my problem as in our case though GR with confirmation will be once in a shift (though in system shift is not defined) but batches will be different and hence material document will be separate. And requirement is to have single inspection lot per shift even if batches and material documents are separate.
One option is to have multiple line items for GR in MB31 or MIGO or in COR6N. But all this transaction allows only one line item for GR against process order. So, can you suggest any function module or option to have multiple line items for GR.
Thanks and regards,
Devang

Part I and Part II in migo

HI,
Can anyone please explain me what is part I and Part II in migo..when do we do part I and Part II. I am really confused.
Please give me some inputs
Thank you

>
scm.sd wrote:
> HI,
>
> Can anyone please explain me what is part I and Part II in migo..when do we do part I and Part II. I am really confused.
> Please give me some inputs
>
>
> Thank you
Suppose when you receive only delivery challan for goods receipt without excise invoice,then you refer only part 1
in excise tab of migo,later after receiving invoice,you can post part 2 using J1IEX(Capture -->Goods Receipt) with
reference to material document.
RG23A Part 1 - Raw material qty,RG23A Part 2 - Raw material Excise values
RG23C Part 1 - Capital goods/assets,RG23C Part 2 - Capitial goods excise values
Since asset is account assigned - 'A' in p.o,on goods receipt,2 entries will hit table one for 'Receipt',other for 'Issue'
RG23C Part 2 - 50% credit of excise values another 50% put on hold taken credit in next year

Inspection Lot Creation after UD

Dear PP/QM Masters,
I have question regarding inspection lot creation after UD for the same batch number.
There will be several GR during one shift for one SKU with the same batch number.
F.E. shift (6 am to 2 pm) at 7 there will be first GR of finished good. Inspection lot is automaticly created and QA at 9 will make UD for this lot. If production will made GR after that a new inspection lot will be created for the same production batch.
Is there any possibility to make only one inspection lot even if UD is taken.
Thanks and regards,

I guess what bothers me is that for your selection of "2" you include date. Our standard SAP system does not include date on that key choice. Just material/batch/storage location.
I re-tested one just to be sure. Created a new process order for 30. Reveived 15. Got an 04 inspection lot created. Processed the lot, posted out the 15 to unrestricted and made the UD with an Accept code.
Then I GR another 10. These went straight to unrestricted as I expected. Then I posted the final 5 in a 3rd GR. Same result.. straight to unresticited.
I'm not sure why your not seeing the same. Again, seeing that 'date' in your number # choice is bothersome. If some modified that to include the date of receipt and included the time stamp in that, then your going to get new inspection lots.
Are you sure they didn't post it to a different batch on the second or third posting. And of course, this does refer to the same process order.. correct? You not using three different process orders for this are you?
Craig

Missing part message in MIGO

Hello,
we have activated the missing part message in MIGO using transaction OMBC.
All is working fine and we receive an notification in business workplace.
The problem is that only one person receives the mail and we want that all MRP controllers get an notification.
In transaction OMBC under "Mail user" we can only maintain one "Recipient Name".
But what is the meaning of "Recipient for mail to MRP controller"? Can we here use position to maintain all controolers in the organization model of the PD (PD-ORG)?
Thanks
Arnfried

Hi There
Specification of the mail recipient- System sends the missing part message to the material planner(MRP Controller) responsible for the material,, in order for this to happen , a user ID must be assigned to the material planner,,
Specification of missing part expediter- if no user ID is assigned to the responsible material planner, the message is sent to the central missing part expediter responsible for the plant. This person is defined per plant,,
So this is what happening in your place,, maintain the user ID to the MRP controller,, then it will work fine,,
Maintain the below settings--
SPRO-IMG-Materials Management-Consumption-Based Planning-Master Data-Define MRP Controllers-Double click on MRP controllers-Maintain the field Recipient Name (User ID) then system will trigger the mail to MRP controllers...
Hope it helps
Thanks
Senthil

Change of Condition Value in PO after MIGO

Hi Gurus!
I want to change the condition value after migo. I have a scenario in which we have lots of purchase orders which are received.
Unfortunately user has mentioned a wrong value in the tax. We want to change the value of tax in the purchase order after cancelling the MIGO document. But the system is not allowing me to do the changes. I also deactivate the release as well through ME29N.
Regards
Imran

Hi,
For changing the tax value, you need to change the tax code to the one that has the correct tax % configured. You can use transaction FTXP to find out the tax rates assigned to tax codes. For changing tax code it it not necessary to cancel already posted GRs
Ramesh

Vendor change in PO for delivery charges after MIGO

Dear All,
System is allowing to change the Vendor for delivery charges even after the MIGO has been done, without any message (warning/error). The Vendor field is editable in PO, even after MIGO.
Vendor was changed, But at the time of MIRO system is showing the old vendor, not the changed one.
Problem is explained with one example-
PO created with "Freight" Delivery charge - with vendor ABCD.MIGO was done.
After MIGO the exact vendor for the Freight was know, Vendor XYZ . As system is allowing to change it without message, it was changed. No change log is there for the changed vendor.
But now at the time of MIRO, system is suggesting u201CPlanned delivery costu201D for Vendor ABCD, not for XYZ.
So how to proceed as the payment has to be done for the new Vendor XYZ.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Vijay P.Bhaware
Edited by: vijaypb on Aug 28, 2011 4:40 PM

Hi,
Please check SAP Note 549408 - Conditions modifiable after invoice receipt for the same.
THis will resolve your issue.
Symptom
You already posted an invoice receipt for a purchase order with delivery costs, but no goods receipt yet. After that you can still change conditions of type 'B' (Delivery costs) via Transaction ME22 or ME22N in the purchase order.
Solution
Refer to the attached advance corrections.
In addition you must adjust message V1631 as follows:
Change the short text of the message via Transaction SE91 as follows: <Z1> No new delivery costs must be entered after occurred GR/IR.
Extend the long text by the following passage in section 'Diagnosis': <Z1> After an occurred invoice receipt the change of delivery costs is not allowed in the purchase, either, as information for the correct process are no longer available and the postings can no longer or not without errors be carried out, particularly after the deletion of posted delivery costs for subsequent cancellations or invoices.
Regards,
Sandesh Sawant

Stock is not showing in storage location after MIGo

I am not able to see the stock in storage location after MIGO. Please help me where Iam wrong.

Hi Deepak,
while GR , which movement type it should ?
check document for that GR , is it created?
check your stock may be at inspection storage location
Thanks
Bala

Ultiboard part wizard doesn't show any copper layers during part creation

Ultiboard part wizard doesn't show any copper layers during part creation. I have to check the box to activate Copper Top in the part editor, once the part is made in order to see what I've made. I suspect there is a connection between this issue and my prior issue with the inability of the Multisim database to link to parts that I have recently made in Ultiboard. This all just began happening this week (of 8-27-12) Design Suite version is 10.1 & OS is Windows 7.
Thanks.

Hi Todc,
This is very strange. My suggestion is that you can try to delete the configuration file. To delete the configuration file, go to Options >> Global Preferences. Under the Paths tab, select the path to the configuration file all the way upto config\ as shown in screen shot. Close Ultiboard and navigate to this folder. Delete all the files and then try to open Ultiboard again. This should resolve the issue.
Please let me know what happens.
Regards,
Tayyab R,
National Instruments.
Attachments:
v10 Global Preferences.JPG ‏77 KB

TR was not created after MIGO

Hi, experts
Sometimes after I did goods receipt with MIGO for purchsing order, the TR was not created by system. Normally after MIGO system create material document and TR at same time, then I use LT06 with reference the document no. place it to the storage bin.
But for this case, no TR generaged. I can only use LT10 /mvt999 to move them to the storage bin.
Can you please tell me the possible reason for this problem( TR not created)?

Can you please check what is the movement type being used ? If you were able to use LT06 in some cases means that most probably 101 is correctly defined in LE--> Interfaces --> Movement types to trigger the TR's.
1) however, if you are using / different movement type is being triggered and is not set up to create the TR.
2) If you see that the movement type is still 101, you could still be creating the TR's in the background, however, if you have a background job or some other transaction that is confirming the open TR's , this could be one of the reasons why you are not able to use LT06.
For this you can go to MIGO ( go to display tab for material document) , go to WM tab and find out the TR # there.
You can then go to LB03 and if you scroll to the right , you will find the TO # created.
Please go to LT21 and check who and how the TO is being created / confirmed, if thats something out of the process for you.
Thanks

After MIGO

Dear All,
I HAVE MADE A PO FOR MATERIAL .AFTER THAT I HAVE DONE GR(movement type 101). BEFORE THIS I HAVE MADE FOLLOWING ADD UPS IN MATERIAL MASTER WM1 AND WM2 VIEWS :-
BASE UNIT OF MEASURE = KG
STOCK PLACEMENT =- FIX
TICK TO u2013 ALLOW ADDN TO EXT. STOCK
NOTHING IN WM2
Now after MIGO when I see report by LX02 , it shows storage bin as PO no.
Report LS26 shows available stock as 100 while putaway and pick qty. as zero.
What are the next steps so that I can put this stock in storage bins and which report will show that this material is in this storage bin?
Thanx in advance

Rohit,
The storage bin = your PO number because you have "dynamic bin" selected for movement type 101 in the warehouse - this is a good thing. (See movement tyep config for your warehouse)
Available stock in LS26 displays the IM quantity available, not the WH available stock. This is because you have a Transfer Requirement that was created but a Transfer Order was not created to put it away in the warehouse. Because you do not have a TO, you do not have a put-away quantity (Transfer Order that has not yet been confirmed, No TO, no putaway qty)
The TO was not created because you have putaway strategy = fixed bin, but you have not identified a BIN in the WH2 view of the material. For fixed bin strategy, SAP relies on data in WH2 view to find the correct bin. Without it, the TO will not be created.
Suggest you correct the material master and then process your open TR in the background using the warehouse activity monitor.

Automatic Invoice creation after Final Settlement (in Route Accounting)

Hello Gurus,
could you please advise how to customize automatic Invoice creation after the Final Settlement.
Now when we press final settlement in COCKPIT (or in Fast Entry) transaction we have new sales order for return (in case of return), then delivery for this order and posting GI for the delivery but we cannot achieve Invoice creation. In settlement log we can see Area: Invoices but they are missing there and system does not try create invoice.
Please advise what we missed.
Thank you in advance
Regards,
Igor

Hello,
could you please check object /DSD/TOUR if it is useful for this?
This is for TOUR STATUS..
For each activity, there will be dedicated status determined by the system??
check with your DSD functional consultant (on customization), to identify the status in which authorization needs to be blocked..
thank you
Venkatesh

IHC errors valid clearing partner not found and no header details found while idoc creation after f110

IHC errors :valid clearing partner not found and no header details found while idoc creation after f110
Please let me know where the config is missing for ihc automatic payment program.in we02 status is not 53.
Please help

Hi
Please share the error message in the IDOC.
If the error message is IHC204 "No valid clearing partner was found", it may be due to the missing correct configuration in Set Up Creation of Payment Requests for Inbound IDoc in FI, which links the clearing partner, ALE logical system partner type and IHC account number.
Cheers
taro

Part creation after MIGO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for