TR creation after MIGO

Hi Experts,
Is there a way to control the number of TR generated by MIGO (on Delivery Number)?
For example, if one delivery contains multi-POs, e.g. three, after MIGO, I get three TRs respectively. (Even if I configure the system to let source BIN use material document number instead of PO number.) The fact is, in order to do further opertions, I need to combine all requirements and generate only one TR, and consequently, one TO.
Please help.

Hi,
In MIGO screen, if u click on WM tab in the item details then u can find the " No Transfer Requirement "
check box. This indicates that :
you can use to ensure that for this particular document no transfer requirements will be generated, although this is normally the case.
If you do not want to have a transfer requirement created, enter X here.
And also, concentrate on the following screen.
path: SPRO->Logistics Execution->warehouse management->Activities->Transfers->Define movement types.
select movement type:101 against ur warehouse number, click enter then u can find the " Manual creation of Transfer requirements are allowed" check box under Transfer requirements heading.
try with this, u can find a solution.

Similar Messages

MIRO creation after MIGO

Dear Gurus,
I have a specific requirement pertaining to MIRO. Normally we do MIGO & then come to MIRO & do invoice postings.
My requirement is when MIGO is done system has to automatically create MIRO & keep it in hold position. Is it possible in SAP to create MIRO automatically based on MIGO creation.
Please guide me this regard.

Hi,
go for ERS follow the steps:-
in vendor master tcode xk02
mark the check box AUTO EVAL. AND SUBSEQUENT SETTLEMENT.
mark the check box GR BASED IV
tcode me11
check NO ERS should not be marked in purchasing data 1 screen
tcode me21n
unmark the invoice reciept check box and mark the gr based ive check box
go to tcode MRRL
and execute
and for more details check this link.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20c57f75-d26f-2910-c3aa-dee124530121
Reward points if helpful,
Regards,
Archit

Part creation after MIGO

Hi,
I have posted a material document with out part-1 updation.
Is it possible to do part-1 after goods receipt
one thing i know is that we can cancel GR and again we can do GR with Part-1 updation
Is there any another solution
regards
Subhash

Dear,
While doing Part-1 after GR to which document i have to refer Purrchase order or goods receipt.
If i refer to the purchase order,it giving as "Document 1051000348 does not contain any selectable items".
Wheras if am doing with reference to GR Excise value are not flowing
Regards
Subhash

Inspection Lot Creation after GR

Dear PP/QM Masters,
I have question regarding inspection lot creation after goods receipt.
There will be GR once at the end of the shift with batch number. As batch generated during shift will be different, there will be multiple GR entry. But for every material only one result recording per shift is required and not for all batches generated. So, how to avoid creation of so many inspection lot? Automatic Inspection lot creation is required hence no question of manual creation of inspection lot.
I checked function module QAPP_CUST_IP_CREATE for inspection point functionality but its description You can use the available function module to generate inspection points for the inspection during production already when the inspection lot is created. Can I use function module QAPP_CUST_IP_CREATE for restricting creation of inspection lot after GR?
Request all Masters to help me in solving this.
Thanks and regards,
Devang

Dear All,
First of all thanks a lot for your response.
I checked Control Inspection Lot setting but even that can not solve my problem as in our case though GR with confirmation will be once in a shift (though in system shift is not defined) but batches will be different and hence material document will be separate. And requirement is to have single inspection lot per shift even if batches and material documents are separate.
One option is to have multiple line items for GR in MB31 or MIGO or in COR6N. But all this transaction allows only one line item for GR against process order. So, can you suggest any function module or option to have multiple line items for GR.
Thanks and regards,
Devang

Inspection Lot Creation after UD

Dear PP/QM Masters,
I have question regarding inspection lot creation after UD for the same batch number.
There will be several GR during one shift for one SKU with the same batch number.
F.E. shift (6 am to 2 pm) at 7 there will be first GR of finished good. Inspection lot is automaticly created and QA at 9 will make UD for this lot. If production will made GR after that a new inspection lot will be created for the same production batch.
Is there any possibility to make only one inspection lot even if UD is taken.
Thanks and regards,

I guess what bothers me is that for your selection of "2" you include date. Our standard SAP system does not include date on that key choice. Just material/batch/storage location.
I re-tested one just to be sure. Created a new process order for 30. Reveived 15. Got an 04 inspection lot created. Processed the lot, posted out the 15 to unrestricted and made the UD with an Accept code.
Then I GR another 10. These went straight to unrestricted as I expected. Then I posted the final 5 in a 3rd GR. Same result.. straight to unresticited.
I'm not sure why your not seeing the same. Again, seeing that 'date' in your number # choice is bothersome. If some modified that to include the date of receipt and included the time stamp in that, then your going to get new inspection lots.
Are you sure they didn't post it to a different batch on the second or third posting. And of course, this does refer to the same process order.. correct? You not using three different process orders for this are you?
Craig

Change of Condition Value in PO after MIGO

Hi Gurus!
I want to change the condition value after migo. I have a scenario in which we have lots of purchase orders which are received.
Unfortunately user has mentioned a wrong value in the tax. We want to change the value of tax in the purchase order after cancelling the MIGO document. But the system is not allowing me to do the changes. I also deactivate the release as well through ME29N.
Regards
Imran

Hi,
For changing the tax value, you need to change the tax code to the one that has the correct tax % configured. You can use transaction FTXP to find out the tax rates assigned to tax codes. For changing tax code it it not necessary to cancel already posted GRs
Ramesh

Vendor change in PO for delivery charges after MIGO

Dear All,
System is allowing to change the Vendor for delivery charges even after the MIGO has been done, without any message (warning/error). The Vendor field is editable in PO, even after MIGO.
Vendor was changed, But at the time of MIRO system is showing the old vendor, not the changed one.
Problem is explained with one example-
PO created with "Freight" Delivery charge - with vendor ABCD.MIGO was done.
After MIGO the exact vendor for the Freight was know, Vendor XYZ . As system is allowing to change it without message, it was changed. No change log is there for the changed vendor.
But now at the time of MIRO, system is suggesting u201CPlanned delivery costu201D for Vendor ABCD, not for XYZ.
So how to proceed as the payment has to be done for the new Vendor XYZ.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Vijay P.Bhaware
Edited by: vijaypb on Aug 28, 2011 4:40 PM

Hi,
Please check SAP Note 549408 - Conditions modifiable after invoice receipt for the same.
THis will resolve your issue.
Symptom
You already posted an invoice receipt for a purchase order with delivery costs, but no goods receipt yet. After that you can still change conditions of type 'B' (Delivery costs) via Transaction ME22 or ME22N in the purchase order.
Solution
Refer to the attached advance corrections.
In addition you must adjust message V1631 as follows:
Change the short text of the message via Transaction SE91 as follows: <Z1> No new delivery costs must be entered after occurred GR/IR.
Extend the long text by the following passage in section 'Diagnosis': <Z1> After an occurred invoice receipt the change of delivery costs is not allowed in the purchase, either, as information for the correct process are no longer available and the postings can no longer or not without errors be carried out, particularly after the deletion of posted delivery costs for subsequent cancellations or invoices.
Regards,
Sandesh Sawant

Stock is not showing in storage location after MIGo

I am not able to see the stock in storage location after MIGO. Please help me where Iam wrong.

Hi Deepak,
while GR , which movement type it should ?
check document for that GR , is it created?
check your stock may be at inspection storage location
Thanks
Bala

TR was not created after MIGO

Hi, experts
Sometimes after I did goods receipt with MIGO for purchsing order, the TR was not created by system. Normally after MIGO system create material document and TR at same time, then I use LT06 with reference the document no. place it to the storage bin.
But for this case, no TR generaged. I can only use LT10 /mvt999 to move them to the storage bin.
Can you please tell me the possible reason for this problem( TR not created)?

Can you please check what is the movement type being used ? If you were able to use LT06 in some cases means that most probably 101 is correctly defined in LE--> Interfaces --> Movement types to trigger the TR's.
1) however, if you are using / different movement type is being triggered and is not set up to create the TR.
2) If you see that the movement type is still 101, you could still be creating the TR's in the background, however, if you have a background job or some other transaction that is confirming the open TR's , this could be one of the reasons why you are not able to use LT06.
For this you can go to MIGO ( go to display tab for material document) , go to WM tab and find out the TR # there.
You can then go to LB03 and if you scroll to the right , you will find the TO # created.
Please go to LT21 and check who and how the TO is being created / confirmed, if thats something out of the process for you.
Thanks

After MIGO

Dear All,
I HAVE MADE A PO FOR MATERIAL .AFTER THAT I HAVE DONE GR(movement type 101). BEFORE THIS I HAVE MADE FOLLOWING ADD UPS IN MATERIAL MASTER WM1 AND WM2 VIEWS :-
BASE UNIT OF MEASURE = KG
STOCK PLACEMENT =- FIX
TICK TO u2013 ALLOW ADDN TO EXT. STOCK
NOTHING IN WM2
Now after MIGO when I see report by LX02 , it shows storage bin as PO no.
Report LS26 shows available stock as 100 while putaway and pick qty. as zero.
What are the next steps so that I can put this stock in storage bins and which report will show that this material is in this storage bin?
Thanx in advance

Rohit,
The storage bin = your PO number because you have "dynamic bin" selected for movement type 101 in the warehouse - this is a good thing. (See movement tyep config for your warehouse)
Available stock in LS26 displays the IM quantity available, not the WH available stock. This is because you have a Transfer Requirement that was created but a Transfer Order was not created to put it away in the warehouse. Because you do not have a TO, you do not have a put-away quantity (Transfer Order that has not yet been confirmed, No TO, no putaway qty)
The TO was not created because you have putaway strategy = fixed bin, but you have not identified a BIN in the WH2 view of the material. For fixed bin strategy, SAP relies on data in WH2 view to find the correct bin. Without it, the TO will not be created.
Suggest you correct the material master and then process your open TR in the background using the warehouse activity monitor.

Automatic Invoice creation after Final Settlement (in Route Accounting)

Hello Gurus,
could you please advise how to customize automatic Invoice creation after the Final Settlement.
Now when we press final settlement in COCKPIT (or in Fast Entry) transaction we have new sales order for return (in case of return), then delivery for this order and posting GI for the delivery but we cannot achieve Invoice creation. In settlement log we can see Area: Invoices but they are missing there and system does not try create invoice.
Please advise what we missed.
Thank you in advance
Regards,
Igor

Hello,
could you please check object /DSD/TOUR if it is useful for this?
This is for TOUR STATUS..
For each activity, there will be dedicated status determined by the system??
check with your DSD functional consultant (on customization), to identify the status in which authorization needs to be blocked..
thank you
Venkatesh

IHC errors valid clearing partner not found and no header details found while idoc creation after f110

IHC errors :valid clearing partner not found and no header details found while idoc creation after f110
Please let me know where the config is missing for ihc automatic payment program.in we02 status is not 53.
Please help

Hi
Please share the error message in the IDOC.
If the error message is IHC204 "No valid clearing partner was found", it may be due to the missing correct configuration in Set Up Creation of Payment Requests for Inbound IDoc in FI, which links the clearing partner, ALE logical system partner type and IHC account number.
Cheers
taro

Creation of PO and docuemnts generated in sytems after MIGO??

hi all
Can anybody tel me ..
1.I have created PO, WHile doing MIGO wht are the documents will be generated.
2. How this link is done in SAP. What are all technical configration for this process.
3.From movement type 101 to GR,PO....?? wht are the links how its configuration setting been done .
Thanks
SAP-MM

hI,
You have asked the entire MM.
Material and acciunting will get generated.
please check the program related to MIGO.You will get the entire technical data and link.
Regards,

Automatic TO Creation after completing GR in MIGO

Dear Experts,
I need to configure in such a way that, once a GR done against a PO in MIGO, Transfer Order should be automatically created. The next step I should do in LT12 - TO confirmation.
Please help me in setting this up.
Regards,
Shetty

Hi,
Please maiantian following customization settings
SPRO>>Logistics Execution>>Warehouse Mgmt>>Activities>>Transfers.
Select the warehosue number and movement type 101
In backround processing tab set automatic TO as 'X'.
Br,
Tushar

Slow table creation after upgrade from 10.2.0.3 to 11.2.0.1 using DBUA

I've recently completed a database upgrade from 10.2.0.3 to 11.2.0.1 using the DBUA.
I've since encountered a slowdown when running a script which drops and recreates a series of ~250 tables. The script normally runs in around 19 seconds. After the upgrade, the script requires ~2 minutes to run.
By chance has anyone encountered something similar?
The problem may be related to the behavior of an "after CREATE on schema" trigger which grants select privileges to a role through the use of a dbms_job call; between 10g and the database that was upgraded from 10G to 11g. Currently researching this angle.
I will be using the following table creation DDL for this abbreviated test case:
create table ALLIANCE (
   ALLIANCEID           NUMBER(10)                      not null,
   NAME                 VARCHAR2(40)                    not null,
   CREATION_DATE        DATE,
   constraint PK_ALLIANCE primary key (ALLIANCEID)
           using index
       tablespace LIVE_INDEX
tablespace LIVE_DATA;When calling the above DDL, an "after CREATE on schema" trigger is fired which schedules a job to immediately run to grant select privilege to a role for the table which was just created:
create or replace
trigger select_grant
after CREATE on schema
declare
    l_str varchar2(255);
    l_job number;
begin
    if ( ora_dict_obj_type = 'TABLE' ) then
        l_str := 'execute immediate "grant select on ' ||
                                     ora_dict_obj_name ||
                                    ' to select_role";';
        dbms_job.submit( l_job, replace(l_str,'"','''') );
    end if;
end;
{code}
Below I've included data on two separate test runs. The first is on the upgraded database and includes optimizer parameters and an abbreviated TKPROF. I've also, included the offending sys generate SQL which is not issued when the same test is run on a 10g environment that has been set up with a similar test case. The 10g test run's TKPROF is also included below.
The version of the database is 11.2.0.1.
These are the parameters relevant to the optimizer for the test run on the upgraded 11g SID:
{code}
SQL> show parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_capture_sql_plan_baselines boolean     FALSE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      11.2.0.1
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
optimizer_use_invisible_indexes      boolean     FALSE
optimizer_use_pending_statistics     boolean     FALSE
optimizer_use_sql_plan_baselines     boolean     TRUE
SQL> show parameter db_file_multi
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     8
SQL> show parameter db_block_size
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_block_size                        integer     8192
SQL> show parameter cursor_sharing
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
cursor_sharing                       string      EXACT
SQL> column sname format a20
SQL> column pname format a20
SQL> column pval2 format a20
SQL> select sname, pname, pval1, pval2 from sys.aux_stats$;
SNAME                PNAME                     PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO        STATUS                          COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO        DSTART                          03-11-2010 16:33
SYSSTATS_INFO        DSTOP                           03-11-2010 17:03
SYSSTATS_INFO        FLAGS                         0
SYSSTATS_MAIN        CPUSPEEDNW           713.978495
SYSSTATS_MAIN        IOSEEKTIM                    10
SYSSTATS_MAIN        IOTFRSPEED                 4096
SYSSTATS_MAIN        SREADTIM               1565.746
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN        CPUSPEED                   2310
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MBRC
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MAXTHR
SYSSTATS_MAIN        SLAVETHR
13 rows selected.
{code}
Output from TKPROF on the 11g SID:
{code}
create table ALLIANCE (
   ALLIANCEID           NUMBER(10)                      not null,
   NAME                 VARCHAR2(40)                    not null,
   CREATION_DATE        DATE,
   constraint PK_ALLIANCE primary key (ALLIANCEID)
           using index
       tablespace LIVE_INDEX
tablespace LIVE_DATA
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 324
{code}
... large section omitted ...
Here is the performance hit portion of the TKPROF on the 11g SID:
{code}
SQL ID: fsbqktj5vw6n9
Plan Hash: 1443566277
select next_run_date, obj#, run_job, sch_job
from
(select decode(bitand(a.flags, 16384), 0, a.next_run_date,
a.last_enabled_time) next_run_date,       a.obj# obj#,
decode(bitand(a.flags, 16384), 0, 0, 1) run_job, a.sch_job sch_job from
(select p.obj# obj#, p.flags flags, p.next_run_date next_run_date,
p.job_status job_status, p.class_oid class_oid,      p.last_enabled_time
last_enabled_time, p.instance_id instance_id,      1 sch_job   from
sys.scheduler$_job p   where bitand(p.job_status, 3) = 1    and
((bitand(p.flags, 134217728 + 268435456) = 0) or
(bitand(p.job_status, 1024) <> 0))    and bitand(p.flags, 4096) = 0    and
p.instance_id is NULL    and (p.class_oid is null      or (p.class_oid is
not null      and p.class_oid in (select b.obj# from sys.scheduler$_class b
                           where b.affinity is null)))   UNION ALL   select
q.obj#, q.flags, q.next_run_date, q.job_status, q.class_oid,
q.last_enabled_time, q.instance_id, 1   from sys.scheduler$_lightweight_job
q   where bitand(q.job_status, 3) = 1    and ((bitand(q.flags, 134217728 +
268435456) = 0) or         (bitand(q.job_status, 1024) <> 0))    and
bitand(q.flags, 4096) = 0    and q.instance_id is NULL    and (q.class_oid
is null      or (q.class_oid is not null      and q.class_oid in (select
c.obj# from sys.scheduler$_class c                          where
c.affinity is null)))   UNION ALL   select j.job, 0,
from_tz(cast(j.next_date as timestamp),      to_char(systimestamp,'TZH:TZM')
), 1, NULL,      from_tz(cast(j.next_date as timestamp),
to_char(systimestamp,'TZH:TZM')),     NULL, 0   from sys.job$ j   where
(j.field1 is null or j.field1 = 0)    and j.this_date is null) a   order by
1)   where rownum = 1
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        1      0.47       0.47          0       9384          0           1
total        3      0.48       0.48          0       9384          0           1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: SYS   (recursive depth: 1)
Rows     Row Source Operation
      1 COUNT STOPKEY (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
      1   VIEW (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5344 size=6615380 card=194570)
      1    SORT ORDER BY STOPKEY (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5344 size=11479630 card=194570)
194790     VIEW (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=537269 us cost=2563 size=11479630 card=194570)
194790      UNION-ALL (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=439235 us)
    231       FILTER (cr=68 pr=0 pw=0 time=920 us)
    231        TABLE ACCESS FULL SCHEDULER$_JOB (cr=66 pr=0 pw=0 time=690 us cost=19 size=13157 card=223)
      1        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SCHEDULER$_CLASS (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=1 size=40 card=1)
      1         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SCHEDULER$_CLASS_PK (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 5056)
      0       FILTER (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
      0        TABLE ACCESS FULL SCHEDULER$_LIGHTWEIGHT_JOB (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=2 size=95 card=1)
      0        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SCHEDULER$_CLASS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=1 size=40 card=1)
      0         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SCHEDULER$_CLASS_PK (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 5056)
194559       TABLE ACCESS FULL JOB$ (cr=9313 pr=0 pw=0 time=167294 us cost=2542 size=2529254 card=194558)
{code}
and the totals at the end of the TKPROF on the 11g SID:
{code}
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      2      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        3      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Misses in library cache during execute: 1
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse       70      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute     85      0.01       0.01          0         62        208          37
Fetch       49      0.48       0.49          0       9490          0          35
total      204      0.51       0.51          0       9552        208          72
Misses in library cache during parse: 5
Misses in library cache during execute: 3
   35 user SQL statements in session.
   53 internal SQL statements in session.
   88 SQL statements in session.
Trace file: 11gSID_ora_17721.trc
Trace file compatibility: 11.1.0.7
Sort options: default
       1 session in tracefile.
      35 user SQL statements in trace file.
      53 internal SQL statements in trace file.
      88 SQL statements in trace file.
      51 unique SQL statements in trace file.
    1590 lines in trace file.
      18 elapsed seconds in trace file.
{code}
The version of the database is 10.2.0.3.0.
These are the parameters relevant to the optimizer for the test run on the 10g SID:
{code}
SQL> show parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.2.0.3
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
SQL> show parameter db_file_multi
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     8
SQL> show parameter db_block_size
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_block_size                        integer     8192
SQL> show parameter cursor_sharing
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
cursor_sharing                       string      EXACT
SQL> column sname format a20
SQL> column pname format a20
SQL> column pval2 format a20
SQL> select sname, pname, pval1, pval2 from sys.aux_stats$;
SNAME                PNAME                     PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO        STATUS                          COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO        DSTART                          09-24-2007 11:09
SYSSTATS_INFO        DSTOP                           09-24-2007 11:09
SYSSTATS_INFO        FLAGS                         1
SYSSTATS_MAIN        CPUSPEEDNW           2110.16949
SYSSTATS_MAIN        IOSEEKTIM                    10
SYSSTATS_MAIN        IOTFRSPEED                 4096
SYSSTATS_MAIN        SREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN        CPUSPEED
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MBRC
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MAXTHR
SYSSTATS_MAIN        SLAVETHR
13 rows selected.
{code}
Now for the TKPROF of a mirrored test environment running on a 10G SID:
{code}
create table ALLIANCE (
   ALLIANCEID           NUMBER(10)                      not null,
   NAME                 VARCHAR2(40)                    not null,
   CREATION_DATE        DATE,
   constraint PK_ALLIANCE primary key (ALLIANCEID)
           using index
       tablespace LIVE_INDEX
tablespace LIVE_DATA
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.01          0          2         16           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2      0.01       0.01          0          2         16           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 113
{code}
... large section omitted ...
Totals for the TKPROF on the 10g SID:
{code}
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.02          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          2         16           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2      0.00       0.02          0          2         16           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse       65      0.01       0.01          0          1         32           0
Execute     84      0.04       0.09         20         90        272          35
Fetch       88      0.00       0.10         30        281          0          64
total      237      0.07       0.21         50        372        304          99
Misses in library cache during parse: 38
Misses in library cache during execute: 32
   10 user SQL statements in session.
   76 internal SQL statements in session.
   86 SQL statements in session.
Trace file: 10gSID_ora_32003.trc
Trace file compatibility: 10.01.00
Sort options: default
       1 session in tracefile.
      10 user SQL statements in trace file.
      76 internal SQL statements in trace file.
      86 SQL statements in trace file.
      43 unique SQL statements in trace file.
     949 lines in trace file.
       0 elapsed seconds in trace file.
{code}
Edited by: user8598842 on Mar 11, 2010 5:08 PM

So while this certainly isn't the most elegant of solutions, and most assuredly isn't in the realm of supported by Oracle...
I've used the DBMS_IJOB.DROP_USER_JOBS('username'); package to remove the 194558 orphaned job entries from the job$ table. Don't ask, I've no clue how they all got there; but I've prepared some evil looks to unleash upon certain developers tomorrow morning.
Not being able to reorganize the JOB$ table to free the now wasted ~67MB of space I've opted to create a new index on the JOB$ table to sidestep the full table scan.
CREATE INDEX SYS.JOB_F1_THIS_NEXT ON SYS.JOB$ (FIELD1, THIS_DATE, NEXT_DATE) TABLESPACE SYSTEM;The next option would be to try to find a way to grant the select privilege to the role without using the aforementioned "after CREATE on schema" trigger and dbms_job call. This method was adopted to cover situations in which a developer manually added a table directly to the database rather than using the provided scripts to recreate their test environment.
I assume that the following quote from the 11gR2 documentation is mistaken, and there is no such beast as "create or replace table" in 11g:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e10592/statements_9003.htm#i2061306
"Dropping a table invalidates dependent objects and removes object privileges on the table. If you want to re-create the table, then you must regrant object privileges on the table, re-create the indexes, integrity constraints, and triggers for the table, and respecify its storage parameters. Truncating and replacing have none of these effects. Therefore, removing rows with the TRUNCATE statement or replacing the table with a *CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE* statement can be more efficient than dropping and re-creating a table."

TR creation after MIGO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for