Patch RAC 10.2.0.1 Solaris 64 bit SPARC

I am trying to upgrade CRS to the most recent version. But could not find the patch number.
Patch 5337014 looks like a database patch, not CRS. Can someone confirm this.
Thanks
-Prasad

After i install the patch, instance on Node 1 does not come back. It looks like diskgroup1 is dis-mounted. How do i mount it back ?
Patch Details
cd /opt/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/bin/
bash-3.00# ./crsctl stop crs
cd /opt/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/install
bash-3.00# ./root102.sh
I had applied the patch on node1 only and the patch took the node down. 2nd node is fine.
$ srvctl start instance -d STAG -i STAG1
PRKP-1001 : Error starting instance STAG1 on node ora-v240-s01
CRS-0215: Could not start resource 'ora.STAG.STAG1.inst'.
SQL> select group_number, name, STATE from v$asm_diskgroup;
GROUP_NUMBER NAME STATE
0 STAGRAC_DATA DISMOUNTED
2 STAGRAC_FLASH MOUNTED
SQL> alter diskgroup stagrac_data mount;
alter diskgroup stagrac_data mount
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-15032: not all alterations performed
ORA-15024: discovered duplicately numbered ASM disk 1
Thanks
-Prasad

Similar Messages

  • Latest patches  for solaris 10 - sparc & x86

    Hi,
    Pls any to help me.
    How can i know the latest patches is released by sun microsystem (solaris 10 - sparc & x86) ?
    Thanks in Advance

    Start here:
    http://sunsolve.sun.com/show.do?target=patches/patch-access
    and here:
    http://sunsolve.sun.com/show.do?target=patchpage
    You may need to sign up for a free SunSolve account.
    You can download README files that show all the latest patches for latest versions, view individual patch information, etc. You need a subscription to download the full patch clusters, but you can download individual patches for free if they are security/bug fixes.

  • 10.2.0.3 on solaris 9(Sparc 64 bit), patch 5257399 needed or not?

    We are going to install oracle 10.2.0.3 on a Solaris 9 (Sparc 64 bit) box. According to Note 406472.1, Mandatory Patch 5752399 is needed for 10.2.0.3 on Solaris 64-bit and Filesystems Managed By Veritas or Solstice Disk Suite software. Our system is not on SAN, only local disks, so I'm sure we don't use veritas file system. But I'm not sure if we still use Solstice Disk Suite software. Sun said that in Solaris 9, Solstice Disk Suite is renamed to Solaris volume manager and it is bundled in Solaris 9. Does this mean Solaris 9 is using Solstice Disk Suite by default and we have to apply patch 5752399?
    How can I verify which file manager we are using? (Our sys adm is not quite sure).
    If we apply the patch no matter we really need it or not, what impact to the system?
    Please advise. Thanks!

    I found by issue "mount -v" that our disk slices are
    UFS type. So we don't need apply patch 5257399,
    right? Please confirm. Thanks!!!For your information, you are asking the user community to confirm, not Oracle. Some (many?) of us are not employed by Oracle.
    Therefore, the only answers you can get are from 'friends'. Nothing would be official and Oracle (and Oracle Support) would not be legally responsible.
    Your safest bet would be to escalate the request wityh Oracle Support.

  • Install newest JRE on Solaris 9 Sparc (64-bit)

    Note: This message has also been posted on the JRE forum. This is the second attempt to post it here.
    I would like to know the best method to replace the JRE that is installed with a Solaris 9 (SPARC) installation. A clean installation of Solaris 9 comes with JRE 1.4 and I would prefer 1.4.1 (64-bit) or newer. Sun provides self-extracting archive downloads of the latest JREs for Solaris, but I have been unsuccessful in using these. I followed the instructions at:
    http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/install-solaris.html
    for doing a self-extracting installation, but this does not replace the contents of /usr/j2se with the new JRE. Additionally a pkginfo still points to the old JRE. I also read the instructions at:
    http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/install-solaris-64.html
    which stated I should install the 32-bit version, and then the 64-bit version. Finally, both set of instructions mention installation from packages, yet I am unable to find the packages to download. What is the best method to remove the JRE from a Solaris installation and install a newer version of the JRE so the pkginfo is updated and the new JRE resides in /usr/j2se? Any assistance is appreciated.

    I found by issue "mount -v" that our disk slices are
    UFS type. So we don't need apply patch 5257399,
    right? Please confirm. Thanks!!!For your information, you are asking the user community to confirm, not Oracle. Some (many?) of us are not employed by Oracle.
    Therefore, the only answers you can get are from 'friends'. Nothing would be official and Oracle (and Oracle Support) would not be legally responsible.
    Your safest bet would be to escalate the request wityh Oracle Support.

  • Messages in the OS logs of Oracle Solaris on SPARC (64-bit)

    One of my Customer is getting following messages in the OS logs of the Oracle Solaris on SPARC (64-bit) machine.
    Feb 2 01:07:33 ndc-m9k-2-r1 Invalid ioctl opcode = 0x403
    Feb 2 03:07:43 ndc-m9k-2-r1 scsi: [ID 243001 kern.warning] WARNING: /pseudo/fcp@0 (fcp0):
    Feb 2 03:07:43 ndc-m9k-2-r1 Invalid ioctl opcode = 0x403
    Feb 2 04:07:34 ndc-m9k-2-r1 oracle[7332]: [ID 566193 user.error] n2a get_local_info: ioctl (get interface flags): Interrupted system call
    Feb 2 05:07:52 ndc-m9k-2-r1 scsi: [ID 243001 kern.warning] WARNING: /pseudo/fcp@0 (fcp0):
    Feb 2 05:07:52 ndc-m9k-2-r1 Invalid ioctl opcode = 0x403
    Feb 2 07:08:08 ndc-m9k-2-r1 scsi: [ID! 243001 kern.warning] WARNING: /pseudo/fcp@0 (fcp0):
    Feb 2 07:08:08 ndc-m9k-2-r1 Invalid ioctl opcode = 0x403
    Feb 2 09:08:25 ndc-m9k-2-r1 scsi: [ID 243001 kern.warning] WARNING: /pseudo/fcp@0 (fcp0):
    Feb 2 09:08:25 ndc-m9k-2-r1 Invalid ioctl opcode = 0x403
    There is a note # 833665.1 on this which states "The issue is caused by the Host Storage metrics collected by the agent" and also a Patch 8477122 has been created for this issue.
    However, there is nothing mention in the Note # 833665.1 about the following one message.
    Feb 2 04:07:34 ndc-m9k-2-r1 oracle[7332]: [ID 566193 user.error] n2a get_local_info: ioctl (get interface flags): Interrupted system call
    Can anyone please tell me
    1. whats the significance of the "oracle[7332]: [ID 566193 user.error] n2a get_local_info: ioctl (get interface flags): Interrupted system call" message in the OS log?
    2. Does this message get stops on applying of patch # 8477122 ?
    Thank you,
    Bhavin

    There are a number of known issues with the 10g agent on Solaris and patches are available. I assume you are running the 10.2.0.5 agent since you reference patch 8477122. If this is a brand new agent installation i would start with applying the latest PSU update which contains many related fixes. If you are still getting the error after this, open an SR with Oracle Support with your specific error message.

  • Workshop (WebLogic 10.2 MP1) not available for Solaris 10 SPARC 64 bit?

    Hi All,
    When Workshop for WebLogic 10.2 MP1 will be available for Solaris 10 SPARC 64 bit.
    I could find "WebLogic 10.2 MP1 for Solaris 10 SPARC 32 bit" but not for SPARC 64 bit!!
    otherwise guide me to download page.
    Thanks and Regards
    Arunachalam.C
    Edited by: arungoin on Feb 16, 2011 4:55 PM

    I found by issue "mount -v" that our disk slices are
    UFS type. So we don't need apply patch 5257399,
    right? Please confirm. Thanks!!!For your information, you are asking the user community to confirm, not Oracle. Some (many?) of us are not employed by Oracle.
    Therefore, the only answers you can get are from 'friends'. Nothing would be official and Oracle (and Oracle Support) would not be legally responsible.
    Your safest bet would be to escalate the request wityh Oracle Support.

  • Solaris 7 sparc 64 bit jdk giving error:referenced symbol not found

    hi
    I have installed jdk 5.0 on solaris 7 sparc for 64 bit support
    I am getting this error while giving java, plz help me
    dl failure on line 717Error: failed /els/install/jdk1.5.0_04/jre/lib/sparcv9/server/libjvm.so, because ld.so.1: java: fatal: relocation error: file /els/install/jdk1.5.0_04/jre/lib/sparcv9/server/libjvm.so: symbol __1c2n6FL_pv_: referenced symbol not found

    I got this problem too.
    have fixed this?
    whether should we patch the os first?

  • 32 or 64 bit Sparc patches for studio 12.3

    I'm confused by the option for 32 or 64 bit patches, I installed Studio12.3 on an M4000 running Solaris 10U8. Why are 32 bit patches for sparc listed? I want the 64 bit patches correct?

    If you are referring to the drop-down list where you select the platform for searching patches, I think listing 32-bit SPARC Solaris is an artifact of allowing patches for old OS versions. There has not been a 32-bit version of Solaris for SPARC for years.
    The list of Studio 12.3 patches is the same whether you select 32-bit or 64-bit Solaris, and in any case each patch covers both 32-bit and 64-bit Studio components. To avoid possible confusion, select 64-bit Solaris as the platform.

  • Oracle RAC 11g on Windows 2008 64 bit - blue screen error on both nodes

    Hi Everyone,
    I installed Oracle RAC 11g on Windows 2008 64 bit, The installation was successfull and crs_state -t shows all services in two nodes are online.
    When executed a select query with 100 sessions( For performance evaluation using Transaction generator ) ,the machine got crashed and blue screen is appeared on two nodes. I restrated the machines and and starts the same evaluation ,bt the same bug is repeating.
    Can anyone suggest a solution to solve this issue? Is our hardware is not sufficient ? Shall we need to perform any
    specific settings in Oracle RAC setup for performance evaluations?
    Is our settings for load balancing is not enough? ( We added "Load Balancing= On" on tnsnames.ora on client for load
    balancing)
    The following machine configuration is used for Oracle RAC setup
    Intel Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz,
    Ram :4GB.
    OS : windows 2008 Server 64 Bit
    Oracle RAC 11g , Clusterware 11g R2 , ASM with 5 raw disk ( 1- votting disk ,1- ocr files and 3 disk files)
    Edited by: user2033016 on Jun 29, 2011 10:02 PM

    user2033016 wrote:
    Hi Everyone,
    I installed Oracle RAC 11g on Windows 2008 64 bit, The installation was successfull crs_state -t executed successfully.
    Bt the machine got crashed ,when executed a select query with 100 sessions( For performance evaluation using TG). A blue screen is appeared on two nodes. So i am not able to evaluate the performance.
    Can you please tell any suggesstions to solve this issue? Is our hardware is not sufficient? Or any software settings has to be done?. I tried most of hte technique ,bt the problem still exists.
    The following machine configuration is used for Oracle RAC setup
    Intel Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz,
    Ram :4GB.
    OS : windows 2008 Server 64 Bit
    Oracle RAC , Clusterware 11g R2 64 Bit.i guess you have installed/configured RAC using VMware. i guess, the problem is with your RAM size. how much disk space and RAM size you have allocated for each machine?
    which documentation you have followed?

  • Compatible HP laser jet printer for EBS 12.0.6 on Solaris 10 SPARC 64 bit

    Hi,
    We have our EBS 12.0.6 on Sun Solaris SPARC 64 bit. There are few hp printer (hp laserjet p2015dn) configured with our application and they are working fine.
    Now we have to add one more printer but ( hp laserjet p2015dn) is not available now.
    So please suggest the hp laserjet printer available for Solaris 10 Sparc 64 bit.
    Thanks,
    Sharad

    We have our EBS 12.0.6 on Sun Solaris SPARC 64 bit. There are few hp printer (hp laserjet p2015dn) configured with our application and they are working fine.
    Now we have to add one more printer but ( hp laserjet p2015dn) is not available now.
    So please suggest the hp laserjet printer available for Solaris 10 Sparc 64 bit.You already have the same type of printer configured and it is working properly, so I would say it is supported.
    What is the difference between the two printers configuration?
    Can you print from the OS to the new printer?
    What do you mean by "not available now"?
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • SMC not getting suggested patch info from Update Manager in Solaris 10

    Hi All,
    why SMC not getting suggested patch info from Update Manager in Solaris 10??
    Thank you in advance.

    Hi All,
    why SMC not getting suggested patch info from Update Manager in Solaris 10??
    Thank you in advance.

  • JRE 6.0 update 1 for Solaris 10 sparc 64 bit

    Will jre 6.0 come out as a patch for Solaris 10 sparc? Or should I install it from the Java download site (http://www.java.com/en/download/manual.jsp)? I currently have jre 5.0.11 (patches 118666-11 and 118667-11).
    Thanks.....

    Will jre 6.0 come out as a patch for Solaris 10
    sparc? Or should I install it from the Java download
    site (http://www.java.com/en/download/manual.jsp)? I
    currently have jre 5.0.11 (patches 118666-11 and
    118667-11).Yes, it's out for 6u1, or should be out by now, as sparc (125136-01 & 125137-01)
    and x86 (125138-01 & 125139-01).
    You cannot patch your way from 5.0 to 6. You need to install the 6 packages, and then you can install the 6u1 patch. (or you could just install the 6u1 packages, and patch from that point onward).
    As to the later question, yes, there isn't a formal JRE patch, but SUNWj6rt is essentially the runtime component of the JDK, so if you just had SUNWj6rt & SUNWj6cfg installed, you would have the equivalent of a JRE, though it still would be installed in a JDK directory. If you have just those two packages installed, then you could use 125136-01 as a JRE patch, since it will only update what installed. Oh yes, I forgot about the 64bit component to the runtime, SUNWj6rtx. If you intend on running the JRE in 64bit mode (-d64), you'd need SUNWj6rtx as well.
    Dave
    Sun Microsystems
    Message was edited by:
    katleman

  • Oracle 11g RAC installation on windows 2008 64 bit

    Hello Everyone,
    can i get some details regarding Oracle 11g RAC installation on windows 2008,
    minimum Hardware Requirement
    Will windows support ASM
    Can i get a documentation regarding the RAC installation on windows. we were planning to have 11.5 on windows 2008.
    please send me some docs regarding os requirements, installation and ASM details.
    Thank you

    Hi Everyone,
    I installed Oracle RAC 11g on Windows 2008 64 bit, The installation was successfull crs_state -t executed successfully.
    Bt the machine got crashed ,when executed a select query with 100 sessions( For performance evaluation using TG). A blue screen is appeared on two nodes. So i am not able to evaluate the performance.
    Can you please tell any suggesstions to solve this issue? Is our hardware is not sufficient? Or any software settings has to be done?. I tried most of hte technique ,bt the problem still exists.
    The following machine configuration is used for Oracle RAC setup
    Intel Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz,
    Ram :4GB.
    OS : windows 2008 Server 64 Bit
    Oracle RAC , Clusterware 11g R2 64 Bit.

  • Xvfb on Solaris 8 (SPARC 32 bit)

    Hello,
    We need to run an Oracle server that needs a Virtual Frame Buffer. We need to set DISPLAY variable set on the system. Opening an xhost is not a solution for us because it is not in the security policy.
    Any pointers or docs are appreciated.
    Thanks in advance,
    Arun.

    Kumar Jangid wrote:
    An .iso image can be downloaded from Oracle's website. You can then create a VM and can install Solaris 10 using it's .iso image.
    Download from: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris10/downloads/index.html
    Hope this will help.
    Edited by: Kumar Jangid on Jul 26, 2012 12:30 AM@ Kumar Jangid,
    Did you actually read the original post?
    That person is confused on what they want or need or think is possible.
    Wait until they respond with a more complete description before throwing out a response that can only confuse them more.
    They said:
    Can someone please let me know the download link from where i can download Solaris 10 Sparc - 32 bit ?which does not exist and has NEVER existed as a free download.
    Then they said:
    As I have to install this using VMware 7 workstation on 32 bit windows 7A Solaris release for SPARC will never run on a Windows box.

  • Solaris 10 SPARC Recommended Patch Cluster for  2008 quarter 3 version

    Dear All,
    Could any one please guide me, where I can download "Solaris 10 SPARC Recommended Patch Cluster" for 2008 quarter 3 version.
    I have checked in sunsolve.sun.com, I'm able to find only the latest release.
    please guide me.
    Thanks and regards,
    veera

    Ok,
    Here's a cute little formula to try using your systems parameters to gain some "head's-up" on an expected or estimated time to complete the patch run.
    You will need a few things to prepare.
    Number of "real" CPU's (not hyperthreads)
    Speed of each CPU as a whole number i.e 2.87Ghz = 2,867
    the total number of patches from the cluster i.e. Sept 15th = 381 (Solaris 10)
    Network factor if using NFS = 2.5
    local cluster file factor = 1.5
    Patch cluster on CDROM factor = 3.25
    Now, combine all of those elements in this equation:
    { ( #1 * #2 ) / #3 * factor(#4 or #5 or #6) }
    This will yield a number in minutes of patch run time. Then all you will need to add is the standard boot up time to get the total of all patching and reboot.
    Of course you could write a script to extract all of this information and feed it to "bc -l" to get a quick figure.
    Example, on one of my Solaris 10 boxes with the information filled in to the equation:
    #> echo "((4*2660)/381)*1.5"|bc -l
    #> 41.88976377952755905511
    It actually took 44.2 minutes to complete the patching of this box plus another 12 minutes to reboot. But all in all a pretty fair estimate I think.

Maybe you are looking for