Payment block without the approval

Hi Gurus,
my users need to be shown a message as" <b>this payment is blocked due the non-approval"</b> during the payment of unapproval of quality check of material.
Pls help me out, its urgent.
Satya.

Hello Satya,
You need to activate the QM for procurement.
- Go to OQB1 -> select the control key which you are using and flag mark "Block Invoice"
- Use this control key in the material master in QM view
If this indicator is set, when the invoice is created, the system determines whether an inspection lot exists and if necessary, sets blocking reason I. This occurs in the following instances:
o There is still no usage decision for the inspection lot
o The inspection lot is rejected
The automatic payment program checks whether the blocking reason I still exists.
Now make sure that when accounting dept creates invoice they give refernce with Delivery or Goods Receipt.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Similar Messages

  • How to get the payment block through the BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE

    Hi,
    how to populate payment block through the BAPI (BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE).  always it is showing 'R' in MIR4 Transaction after the BAPI is executed.

    check
    BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_HEADER-PMNT_BLOCK
    regards
    Prabhu

  • How to populate the payment block through the BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE

    Hi,
    I am trying to create the incoming invoice through the BAPI (BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE) .
    In MIRO transaction when i create the Invoice without any tax , the <b>payment block shows free for payement</b> . How to give create the invoice with the following condition through the BAPI (BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE) .  when there is Tax : The payment block = 'R' (Invoice verification) .
    No Tax                : The payment block = ' ' (Free for Payment).

    But everytime the invoice is created the Payment block is set to 'R' even if the Tax is not given.
    Following i am populating
    <b>Header Structure:</b>
    <b>Test                   Value Description                      PI Header Data Fields</b>
    ‘X’                Invoice Indicator     HEADERDATA-INVOICE_IND
    SPACE                Document Type     HEADERDATA-DOC_TYPE
    05-11-2006           Document Date     HEADERDATA-DOC_DATE
    17-11-2006           Posting Date                     HEADERDATA-PSTNG_DATE
    123456-B1                Ref Document Number     HEADERDATA-REF_DOC_NO
    9001               Company Code     HEADERDATA-COMP_CODE
    7006924               Vendor Number     HEADERDATA-DIFF_INV
    BRL               Currency                     HEADERDATA-CURRENCY
    BRL               Currency                     HEADERDATA-CURRENCY_ISO
    10000               Gross Amount      HEADERDATA-GROSS_AMOUNT
    05-11-2006          Baseline ate                     HEADERDATA-BLINE_DATE
    DD               Header Text                     HEADERDATA-HEADER_TXT
    0001               Payment Terms     HEADERDATA-PMNTTRS
    123456-B1               Ref Document Number     HEADERDATA-REF_DOC_NO
    Z1               NF Type                       HEADERDATA-J_1BNFTYPE
    space               Payment Block Key      HEADERDATA-PMNT_BLOCK
    <b>For Item Structure:</b>
    <b>Test Data     Description            BAPI Item Data Fields</b>
    000001                     Invoice Item           ITEMDATA-INVOICE_DOC_ITEM
    4500021387     Purchase Order Number   ITEMDATA-PO_NUMBER
    0010                     Purchase Order Item           ITEMDATA-PO_ITEM
    Z1                     Tax Code                           ITEMDATA-TAX_CODE
    SP 50308                     Tax Jurisdiction Code           ITEMDATA-TAXJURCODE
    10000                      Item Amount           ITEMDATA-ITEM_AMOUNT
    200                      Item Quantity           ITEMDATA-QUANTITY
    EA                      Purchase Order Unit           ITEMDATA-PO_UNIT
    Can u please tell me what is the mistake or any other ways of populating the Payment block.
    Always the payment block is 'R' in MIR4 transaction even if i give space in the BAPI

  • Payment Block at the time of FB60

    Hi
    I want to have payment block flowing directly in FB60. I shud not enter manually
    So what i did:
    I went to OBA3. There i defined tolerance group and i gave payment terms as 0002
    In that payment terms, i have given payment block key A
    But when i did FB60, i saw no payment term and payment block is populated at vendor line item. Let me know the reason why it didn't flow to vendor

    Please check, that you are giving that tolerange group in the vendor master in FK02 > Company Code Data > Accounting Information. Also the payment term assigned in OBA3 is used only for residual item creation in F-44.
    To fetch the payment block in FB60, you should assign the payment term (having payment block in OBB8) in the vendor master in FK02 > Company Code Data > Payment Transactions.
    Regards,
    SDNer

  • In FBL5N, i can't modify the "payment block" by the mass change

    Hi All,
    In FBL5N, launched for more vendors, choosing the button "mass change", SAP doesn't allow me to modify the "payment block". Its field is grey.
    I wonder if is possible making this field modifiable.....
    Thank You or Your help
    Gandalf

    Hi
    Go XK99 and go to fields tab and select payment block then execute it - here put your vendor number range & company code then execute again - now in upper New Values - make it blank and press SAVE button so all payment block will be remove for those particular vendors (Mass change)
    Best Of Luck
    Tanmoy

  • Payment blocking upto quality approving

    Hi,
    Client is not using QM Module.
    After GR , sometimes it take almost 1 month for the quality approval.
    By this time the invoice goes to Finance dept , but purchase dnt want to make the payment for this until quality approval.
    In SAP any settings are there to block payment until quality approval.
    Finance people cant trace whether quality approved or not , coz it is done out of SAP.
    Material will be in unrestricted status until the quality inspection.
    Kindly advise.
    regards,

    Hi.
    Make the GR in the GR blocked stock. I mean by using movement type 103. If you make a GR in GR blocked stock system will not update the stock quantity and value.
    Once the stock is approved by quality you can do transfer posting from movement type 103 to 105.Hence it will update the stock quantity and stock value in the system.
    Also you can activate invoice block key DW: Quantity variance when GR quantity = zero.
    I hope this would be the ideal solution for your problem.
    Hope this helps you.
    Cheers
    Umakanth

  • MIRO R payment block without price difference

    Dear gurus,
    I'm stuck in the middle of a problem: please help me solving it.
    I've done a MIRO related to a good receipt: payment lock has been set to "R" value in FI document. Invoice value is the same of good receipt value: no price difference at all.
    What I immediatly check is this:
    1) MRBR shows "X" in Blocking Reason Price column with a yellow background of the cell
    2) MRBR difference column is 0
    3) OMR6 tolerance for this CoCode are set only for PP and BD (but PP and BD are not appliable in this case because invoice exactly match good receipt)
    Please guide me finding reason why invoice has been locked. That's not an isolated case, other examples happened in production environment.
    How can I go on analyzing the issue? How can I find the reason why some invoices are blocked?
    Thanks a lot!
    Andrea

    Hi
    Another reason I could think of was due to tolerance limit AP being set up which checks the invoice amount at item level against the PO item level amount. If there is a mismatch at item level as well, Block Reason R is set up.
    You may want to check the tolerance group set up for your company codes as per the document below:
    http://scn.sap.com/community/erp/logistics-mm/blog/2014/04/18/invoice-tolerance-limits--an-insight--part-1
    Thanks & Regards
    Sanil Bhandari

  • Payment Block removed or allow to make the payment after the due date

    Hi,
    Regarding Payment block, we have created one payment term with block indicator and assigned to some vendors. So each posting system will generate the entry with payment block, once the document crossed the due date (assume that 30days) system wants to allow to make the payment to the vendor without deleting or removing  the payment block. Is it possible.
    govind

    Hello,
    For this change, you need to develop a program and need to identify the age of 30 days invoices and remove payment block for those invoices. So 30 days aged invoices can clear.
    Logic: go to BSIK and find out ZFBDT of the document and deactivate the ZLSPR (Payment block).
    Or
    try to find out any functional module or user exit is available while clearing invoices. if available maintain the above logic.
    Regards,
    venkat

  • Adding custom message in exception list of F110 transaction without adding payment block

    Hi All,
    My requirement is to add custom message in exception list of F110 transaction based on certain fields validation without adding payment block .
    I tried using BTE 1820 where I can add my validation but am not able to add the custom message in exception list.
    Thanks,
    Mihika.

    Hi Raymond,
    Thanks for your reply.
    I did checked the document and tried giving the S and I message in my BTE with trace option checked on Additional log screen.
    But Success and information message doesn't showed in Exception List.
    If I set the Error message the Proposal gets cancelled and I can see my error message in log. (We don't want this option as in this option proposal is not getting created)
    If I set the Payment block I can see that logged in exception list. But we don't want to set the payment block but the message should appear in exception list.
    I added the message using simple message statement. Will you please advice if any other way to add the message other than using the MESSAFE statement.
    Thanks,
    Mihika.

  • Payment block in a vendor without invoice block

    Hi,
    We have a peculiar requirement.
    Client is requesting us to block a particular vendor for payment however invoicing needs to remain open.
    I presume we can do this using two methods:-
    1.) Payment block in vendor master
    Limitation 1 - Let us say that the block indicator is "A" which we have set in the vendor master record and in the configutation of the Block Indicator we Do not check the box of Change in Payment proposal and Check the box of Manual Payment block.
    This will block the invoice for payment using F110 and will also not allow change of block in the proposal.
    However this will not prevent payment block using F-53 (manual payments)
    2.) Manually insert Payment block in the individual invoice posting
    Limitation - End user can remove the payment block and then process the invoice.
    3.) Default Payment block in the payment term that is in the vendor master record
    Limitation - End user can remove the payment block and then process the invoice.
    Can anyone please suggest me a method to achieve this.
    Thanks,
    Nitish

    Hi
    Invoice will go for a block only when the quantity and/or price at the time of Invoice goes beyond the Purchase order quantity and price. This is delpendent upon the tolerance limit you define in the customization for LIV.
    If the quanity and/or price is less than that system only issues a warning message.
    If you are not expecting any further delivery after say 50 (out of 100 quantity) you need to manually close the PO by setting the delivery completed indicator in Delivery tab of item detail of PO.
    MRao

  • To set payment block to 'A' in F-59 transaction on the original document.

    When I run the transaction f-59 for a document, my requirement is that I should set the payment block to 'A' for the original document.
    I tried using the BTE - sample_process_00001120, but it doesn't seem to update the value for the original document or the current document that gets posted.
    Kindly suggest how i can handle this.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    Try the following BTE's for changing the Payment Block for the current document. Change the value T_BSEG-ZLSPR.
    00001020     POST DOCUMENT:       Prior to final checks
    00001025     POST DOCUMENT:       Final checks completed
    00001030     POST DOCUMENT:       Posting of standard data
    00001050     POST DOCUMENT:       Accounting interface
    Think that for updating the payment block in Original Document, we should try with some FI document change BAPI.
    Regards,
    Harish

  • How to Make MRBR to show the Customised Payment Block Indicator (MIRO) ?

    Hi
    Currently, from what I know of, MRBR only showing Log Payment Block as follows:
    A     Automatically blocked due to existence of blocking reasons
    S     Stochastically blocked
    M     Manual payment block set in header - no blocking reasons
    W     Automatically blocked due to entry via Web Invoice
    However during the manual MIRO creation, I put in customised Payment Block G (Block due to XX) in the Payment Tab of MIRO. This G does not get shown up in MRBR.
    How to make it possible in MRBR as I have configured a few customised Payment Block such as G (Block due to XX) and H (Block due to YY).
    I would like MRBR to show up the exact Payment Block indicators as those in the MIRO.
    Please help.
    Thanks

    Hi Nick.
    I just found out that Payment Block Indicator shown in MIRO will appear in MRBR. The reason that it was not shown in MRBR because during MIRO creation, it was set BLANK and then user went to FB02 to change it with other customised Payment Block Value, thus when we run MRBR, it was showing blank under Payment Block column. Thus, we had to resort to LOG Payment Block which gave rise to this thread.
    Having understand the importance of how FB02 changing  payment block will affect MRBR, we have decided not to let user change the payment block in FB02.
    SAP note: 394370 has explained everything:
    "A document generated with MIRO was blocked for payment. You cancel the payment block from the vendor line item in the FI follow-up document. Transaction MRBR then displays the invoice document nevertheless. Why?
    The invoice document itself cannot be changed by changes to the follow-up documents; this is not programmed. Transaction MRBR therefore continues to display the document as blocked. If this document is released from an MM point of view, the FI follow-up document remains released. Thus the damage caused is restricted to unnecessary work by the user. SAP recommends that you only use the release transactions for releasing invoices."
    Thanks a lot!

  • Removal of payment block "R"

    Hi,
    We are encountering an issue while removing the payment block for the invoices. When the payment block "R" is removed manually,  we are finding that the number of days for payment are getting enhanced automatically in the document.
    Please let me know the reasons for the same if anybody encountered such issue before. Thanks.
    Regards,
    S.Sumana.

    Hi,
    (A)
    Go to CDPOS in another screen and input the below:-
    OBJECTCLAS  =   INCOMINGINVOICE
    OBJECTID        =    Invoice number followed by year without any space
    TABNAME        =   RBKP_BLOCKED
    FNAME            =    KEY
    CHNGIND         =    D
    Note down the CHANGENR of the entry obtained.
    (B)
    Again go to table CDPOS in another window and input the below:-
    OBJECTCLAS  =   BELEG
    OBJECTID        =    System Client no., Company Code, Accounting document number, Fiscal Year without any space
    TABNAME        =   BSEG
    FNAME            =    ZBD1T
    CHNGIND         =    U
    Note down the CHANGENR of the entry obtained.
    If the above CHANGENR obtained in (A) and (B) are sequential, then the no. of days for that document is increased by MRBR using "Move Cash Disc. base".
    You can also check in table CDHDR, that both of the above CHANGENR is made on the same day, by same user at same time using same tcode MRBR.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • Removing Payment Blocks through Workflow.

    Hi ,
    Hi , i  am Working FI invoice approval workflow.
    There are three steps , that is parking of invoice , Certification of invoice and Posting of invoice.
    now once the posting of invoice is done it should remove the payment block from the invoice .
    Is there any standard way of  Removing the payment Blocks through Workflow.
    Please sugget
    thanks in Advance.

    Hi ,
    you can use   FI_PAYMENT_BLOCK_UPDATE Function module in your method for removing the Payment blocks .
    BR
    Abhijeet

  • (INVOICE) PAYMENT BLOCK DUE TO QUALITY REASON

    Dear All,
    We are working on QM implementation for one of our client.
    The process is as follows
    1.     MIGO with Mvt 103
    2.     Inspection lot is generated after Mvt 103
    3.     Usage decision for inspection lot. Lot accepted  and moved to Unrestricted use stock (Mvt 105)
    4.     MIRO w.r.to PO
    Requirement: We wish to have payment block for the material. For that we have maintained Control Key for u201CInvoice Blocku201D in Quality Management view of Material Master record. So that after invoice verification, invoice document is generated but the status should be u201CBlocked for Paymentu201D.
    Issue: For some of the purchase order u201CInvoice is blocked for the payment while for others invoice is not blocked for the paymentu201D. Please note that both the purchase order are identical in terms of material, vendor, pur grp, mat grp and all the possible entries.
    Moreover in another case, for the same purchase order, one invoice is blocked for payment while other is not blocked for payment.
    Regards
    Gunjan

    HI,
    There is a Quality Block (Block.reason: quality) check Box active in the MIRO,untill we have cleared the Stock from quality inspection.
    So we have to write in the Exit below
    EXIT_SAPLMRMP_010-ZXM08U16-----MIRO
    if this indicator SPGRC is "X" Configure an error message that material is in Quality inspection.
    Hope so it helps
    Regards
    Anjanna.

Maybe you are looking for