Payment doc is not reflecting in Payment summary & check is not generated

Hi Expert,
I have run f110, in proposal run 37 item reflecting but in paymment summary (i doc) only 34 items are picked, but FI documnet is created for all 37 items same is checked in BKPF table, but check is created for only 34 items. ( i am making vendor paymemt)
My query is below?
y check is not generated for remaning 3 items?
how come FI document is created for all 37 items? if in paymnet summary only 34 items are picked
As i am new to SAP, i am very much confused.
waiting for reply
Regards
Pankaj

Check those missed and cleared documents may be MIRO and MIRO reversal documents.

Similar Messages

Changes to subtasks are not reflected in the summary task

I use Project Professional 2013.
Changes to subtasks are not reflected in the summary tasks. This includes both work and actual work as well as % complete. The tasks are all auto scheduled. Is there a setting that I need to change?

The only way I know to make that happen is if calculate project after every edit is disabled (See Options, Schedule tab).
Does this happen in all project files, for other PCs near you and do you have SP1 installed for Project 2013?
Rod Gill
Author of the one and only Project VBA Book
www.project-systems.co.nz

Ipod touch 1G (3.1.3): notes problems+disconnects when i check 'sync notes'

Hi everyone, I got this ipod touch 1G and recently upgraded it to the 3.1.3 firmware. Lovely update to the clock and the calculator, but it screwed my notes!
First thing i noticed was that I couldn't open many of my notes; it returns to the home screen when u tap on a note. The notes that could open, opened up to the wrong note! (select note A: note B opens up!)
second thing i noticed was that I could no longer WRITE any notes. This is a major problem for me. New notes just don't get written and i am ejected to the home screen again.
3rd thing: cannot delete existing notes.
4th when i check 'sync notes' in itunes(9.0.8), it just refuses to sync when it reaches notes, saying that "itunes could not sync notes to the ipod because the ipod disconnected"
Have tried:
Restarting itunes +doing hard restart on ipod touch. <fixed the sync notes option unchecking itself.
Any help will be greatly appreciated thanks in advance!

I have the exact same problem.
Would really appreciate if anyone could help me get access to my notes again.
Please and thank you

Not aware of system readiness check - SAP Note 817920.

Hi,
I am not aware of system readiness check SAP Note 817920.
Can you please let me know the procedure do it?
And also I am not able to log on http://server:port/rwb in XI server.
please suggest me.

hi
1. if you want to look this sap note SAP Note 817920 for this you must have market place user id password
To check SAP Notes go to http://www.service.sap.com/notes
2. And also I am not able to log on http://server:port/rwb in XI server.
r u able to login into xi server if yes then u r entering wrong id adn password..if no then check for user id and password is it valid ?
Thanks
Kunaal

Some Document Not Reflected in Payment Proposal

Hi
I Have Made some entries through FB60. All other specifications are correct, Mean Payment Term, Method Etc.
But When i run Payment Proposal through F110. It Not Appear in Proposal. Please can ant one guide.
Manoj J

Issue Closed. Actually Posting Period was Not Open. Now It is Picked by Proposal

Down Payment entries not reflecting in J1INMIS report

Dear Guru's,
TDS deducted at the time of down payment made to vendor is not reflecting in J1inmis report.
Is J1INMIS report does not reflect down payment entries?
What will be the reason for this?
Which alternative report to followed for J1INMIS !!!
Waiting for your positive reply.
Regards,
Sany.

Hi Sany,
To update Business Place & Section Code, execute the program given below. After execution of the program run T.Code J1INPP and your issue should get resolved. Let me know if this works.
Ask the Abaper to write the following Code & execute the program:
REPORT ZFI_BUP_SEC_CHANGE.
TABLES : BSIK,BSAK,BSEG.
parameters: PA_BELNR TYPE BSEG-BELNR OBLIGATORY,
            PA_BUKRS TYPE BSEG-BUKRS OBLIGATORY,
            PA_GAAHR TYPE BSEG-GJAHR OBLIGATORY.
PARAMETERS : PA_BUPLA TYPE BSEG-BUPLA NO-DISPLAY,
             PA_SECCO TYPE BSEG-SECCO NO-DISPLAY.
PA_BUPLA = 'MUM'.                               (Note : Use the Business place & section Code Used
PA_SECCO = 'MUM'.                                         in your company code).
START-OF-SELECTION.
PERFORM CHANGE_DATA.
END-OF-SELECTION.
*&      Form CHANGE_DATA
      text
--> p1        text
<-- p2        text
FORM CHANGE_DATA .
DATA : LT_BSEG TYPE TABLE OF BSEG WITH HEADER LINE,
       LT_BSIK TYPE TABLE OF BSIK WITH HEADER LINE,
       LT_BSAK TYPE TABLE OF BSAK WITH HEADER LINE.
BSeg updation
SELECT *
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSEG
FROM BSEG
WHERE BUKRS = PA_BUKRS   AND
      GJAHR = pa_gaahr   AND
      BELNR = PA_BELNR.
LOOP AT LT_BSEG.
IF LT_BSEG-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '26'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '28'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '36'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '38'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '39'.
    LT_BSEG-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
    LT_BSEG-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
    MODIFY BSEG FROM LT_BSEG.
    Write : / LT_BSEG-BELNR, 'Update For BSEG', LT_BSEG-BSCHL,
              LT_BSEG-BUPLA,LT_BSEG-SECCO.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Bsik updation
SELECT *
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSIK
FROM BSIK
WHERE BUKRS = PA_BUKRS   AND
      GJAHR = pa_gaahr   AND
      BELNR = PA_BELNR.
LOOP AT LT_BSIK.
IF LT_BSIK-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '26'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '28'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '36'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '38'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '39'.
    LT_BSIK-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
    LT_BSIK-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
    MODIFY BSIK FROM LT_BSIK.
    Write : / LT_BSIK-BELNR, 'Update For BSIK', LT_BSIK-BSCHL,
              LT_BSIK-BUPLA,LT_BSIK-SECCO.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
BsAk updation
SELECT *
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSAK
FROM BSAK
WHERE BUKRS = PA_BUKRS   AND
      GJAHR = pa_gaahr   AND
      BELNR = PA_BELNR.
LOOP AT LT_BSAK.
IF LT_BSAK-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '26'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '28'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '36'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '38'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '39'.
    LT_BSAK-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
    LT_BSAK-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
    MODIFY BSAK FROM LT_BSAK.
    Write : / LT_BSAK-BELNR, 'Update For BSAK', LT_BSAK-BSCHL,
              LT_BSAK-BUPLA,LT_BSAK-SECCO.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
ENDFORM.                    " CHANGE_DATA
Thank You.

F110: payment doc spliting

Dear all,
After F110, we expect to have one payment doc per vendor. However, same payment doc number lists twice. each payment doc group different doc type. eg. we have RE, KA and ZE in the open invoice. after f110, ZP shows twice with same doc number. One ZP groups RE and KA.
One ZP groups ZE. This happens after we upgrade to ECC 6.0 and ZP doc is generated via BAPI (MIRO). Before upgrade ZE was posted via BDC( MR01).
Did anyone have this type of issue before? Can anyone please advise the possible solution?
Thank you very much in advance.
Molly

HI,
This is possible to different year, but isn't your case. Documents number must entered without overlap. You've checked it.
You should try to find a SAP note on ths situation. If doesn't work you have to send a SAP message.
Rgds

Process order batch number not reflecting in corresponding inspection lot

Hi QM gurus,
I am working on inprocess inspection for production. I am creating process order during that time batch no is generated automatically by the system. Now process order is released during this time Inspection lot generated with inspection type 03. Now the problem is in the inspection lot, process order batch number is not reflecting. I have checked all the master data seetings. All seems to be fine. what could be the problem. any settings missed can anybody help me out.
Thanks
Vinameath

Hi Vinameath,
Go to the Master Recipe (C202) of this Process order/Material. Go to Recipe Header tab and click on the Quality Management Header button.
Now,go to the Partial Lot Assign field and maintain the value " 0 Partial Lots not supported " and save.
Then create a new process order and in all probabilities, the batch should appear on the in-process inspection lot.
Hope this helps you!
Regards,
Vinodh

Sales order rejected in ECC does not reflect in APO

Hi Friends,
We are working on ECC6 and APO7.0 for a paper mill- IS Mill functionality. We have MTO ATP with block planning and a exernal trim application. The sales order is rejected in ECC but did not reflect in APO. This has not appeared in daily CCR monitoring also. The order is trimmed, i.e planned for production. I dont see the rejection in APO table: /SAPAPO/SD_DOC Beow are the sequence of events:
-Order rejected 3/25
-Sales order 42678-20 had planned order 587645.
-Planned order 587645 is part of the enquee 4487 that was downloaded to trim on 4/4. Well after the rejection.
Please guide me if there is any way to prevent such occurences, leading to unnecessary planning, blocking of capacities.
Thanks in advance.
Arvind

Arvind,
I haven't worked with SCM when linked to IS_MILL, so I am not speaking from experience. However, I have worked with SCM and ERP Baseline, so I will be speaking from this perspective.
You didn't mention how your GATP is configured, and what planning modules you have implemented in SCM. These facts definitely can have an impact on the supply elements (planned or production orders), and what should/should not happen to these supply orders.
You also didn't mention what indicated to you that the Sales order is inconsistent between the two system. FYI just looking at tables is not a definitive method. The most important bits of information lie in LiveCache.
I don't know what is meant by "Planned order 587645 is part of the enquee 4487 ", so I will assume it is some customized interface, and I will ignore this statement for the moment.
So, I will just make a couple of suggestions as a starting point. If the sales order is actually rejected, it should not appear in R/3 MD04. Does it? If so, run program SDRQCR21 in R/3. The inconsistent order should then disappear from MD04.
If MD04 does not show the sales order (as it shouldn't), but /SAPAPO/RRP3 does show the sales order, then run program /SAPAPO/SDRQCR21 in SCM.
If neither MD04 not //RRP3 currently shows the sales order, then please tell me why you think there is a problem.
Best Regards,
DB49

AR Down Payment Invoice Does Not Reflect in BP Master Data...

We have placed a sales order for a BP.
We select payment means and accept the payment
In the background a AP Down Payment Invoice is created
When we view the BP master data - the account ballance window does NOT reflect this "down payment"
If we select the golden arrow at account ballance, uncheck "reconciled transactions" you can see the payment and AP down payment and they clear each other out.
The problem is that when the final invoice is created it is not obvious that a down payment has been received. Even if you are simply working at the BP master data window, it is not obvious that a down payment has been received. I belive our process is correct because If you click the TDP box, the payment is listed and will be applied to the final invoice.
It simply does not alert the user that a payment had been received.
What are we doing wrong?????\
Thank you!
Edited by: Andrew Bleier on Feb 4, 2009 1:27 AM

Keith Taylor
You are right this feature is only available in Version 2007A. There account posting happen purely due to the pay SAP has been designed and the configuration of GL Accounts.
To make fundametal change to the core product is very difficult if you explain me your business process exactly as you do, I could think of alternatives.
Please let know.
Suda

Payment run - should not clear the open item but should post payment doc

Hi Gurus,
Can you please help me , on how to acheive like when payment run F110 post the payment doc it should not close the open item rather keep that open item as open item , but hsould be be paid by payment doc posted through payment run F110.
Have any one of you had similar requirement ..? FICO gurus help me to acheiev this .. any exit /BADI ..or ideas..
Appreciate your help in advance

HI ,
Thanks for your reply , but still I am not clear on that.
reason they want to keep this open to be kept as open item , so that item will be picked up by dunning run ..
Basically the open invoice is being cleared by payment doc which was generated by payment run. If we look at BSEG in the open item record BSEG-AUGBL = will have the clearing doc number , and in addition to that BSEG will have created another record for the clearing doc as well .
May be since open invoice record is being updated with clearing doc (AUGBL ) , I belive its not shown up as open item .
Somehow this item should be kept as open item ... that is the req and also paid item payment reference should be transfered to Bill of exchange as well.
Hope you have clear background of my req...
Tnanks in advance ,

Down payment doc not cleared in Payment Run F110

Dear Friends,
Document 1700000043 is a reversal of down payment which should be settle with final invoice 5400212994. Both documents have the same due date, but only 5400212994 was cleared with a payment run.
Please can anybody clarify why document 1700000043 was not cleared with a payment run.
I checked in Exception list and found error message as "No Payment possible because Items with a debit balance still exists; see job log"
User follow the below process:
1) Downpayment made as below on 08.10.2009
Vendor                                   29.000,00
LC El PaymClrng Ac               34.510,00-
Payables Tax Input                  5.510,00
1) GR posgted on 26.11.2009
            Engineering Service   41.700,00
            GR/IR - Services         41.700,00-
3) IR posted on 26.11.2009 and Net due date 23.12.2009
         Vendor                           49.623,00-
          GR/IR                              41.700,00
          Payables Tax Input           7.923,00
4) Downpayment Reversal on 26.11.2009
      Vendor (PK 39)                 29.000,00-
       Venfor (PK 26)                34.510,00
       Payables Tax Input           5.510,00-
Please check above process and let me know if any details are needed for further.
Thanks,
Venkat

HI Venkat,
Sorry Venkat. It is the clarance in F-54 not the Revesal.
After clearance, the amount 29.000,00 is posted to Vendor Spl GL. So nullified this account.
Once cleared, the amount is posted to Normal Vendor ac as 34.510,00 (Doc 1700000043)
So this doc is not picked in Payment Run.
Invoice amount is 49.623,00-. So the difference 15113 (49.623,00-34.510,00) should be cleared in Payment run. It is not done.
My assumption is there is the amount difference between Normal Vendor to Speial Vendor (34,510 - 29000). Is it the cause to not picked the doc 1700000043 in payment run.
Please advise what I can do?
Thanks
Venkat

Customer payment amount is not reflected in Profit center trail balance

Dear All,
One accounting document customer payment
PK: 40 Gl 121222 inr 100.00 Profit center : p2010
PK : 15 CUSTOMER inr 100.00
the above amount rs 100.00 is not reflecting in Profit center Trail balance F.5D.
Please help me on this issue.
Best Regards,
Venkat.

For AR and AP, you need to prediocally execute 1KEK - Transferring Payables/Receivables .

Payment to vendor not reflecting in Reports

Hi ,
While running CNS41 , data is not flown in payment column.
I made the following checks as per previous inputs, (thnks for the help)
1. Cash management is activated.
2. table RPSCO contains the values which payed with reference to WBS.
3. Expenses is ticked.
though the pb is remain unresolved.
rgds

Are you sure you've reconstructed the DB? Ensure you've executed this un-checking the 'Test Run'. You should be seeing some log after successful recontruction. Also check if values appear in hierarchy reports.
I'm just trying to guess here. Let's wait for other views this it's not resolved yet.
Regards
Sreenivas

Down payment not reflecting in report

Dear All,
I have created a project Budjeted it, made the PR PO GRN, MIRO which all is reflection in budget/actual/commitment... report,
but i also did DPR using F-47 and F-48 but the values from this transaction is not reflection in the report.
Pls guide
Regards,
Mandar

Hi Mandar,
This is verymuch possible in single report, do the following steps you will see these all in Single report under Tcode: S_ALR_87013558.
1. Go to T-ocde CJE5
2. Select the form 12KST1A
3. Ensure that the Form is in Change mode.
4. On your right side you will see columns, after the last column on the blank space double click or click + icon on tool bar, a pop-up will come, in that pop-up select radio button Key figure with characteristics.
5. A new window will open, here you enter the following
Version : 0, valutype : 12, object type: P.
6. Click on change short text and right the text as Downpayment.
7. Click conform.
8. Now in menu> Extras> Drill down display --> select rows/columns, now select the new column also and save, so that this column will appear in the reports.
This you can do yourself, just need to take authorisation for CJE5 T-code. once u do this your client managemnt can see the data in one report.
Thanks
Regards
kishore

Payment doc is not reflecting in Payment summary & check is not generated

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for