Down Payment entries not reflecting in J1INMIS report

Dear Guru's,
TDS deducted at  the time of down payment made to vendor is not reflecting in J1inmis report.
Is J1INMIS report does not reflect down payment entries?
What will be the reason for this?
Which alternative report to followed for J1INMIS !!!
Waiting for your positive reply.
Regards,
Sany.

Hi Sany,
To update Business Place & Section Code, execute the program given below. After execution of the program run T.Code J1INPP and your issue should get resolved. Let me know if this works.
Ask the Abaper to write the following Code & execute the program:
REPORT  ZFI_BUP_SEC_CHANGE.
TABLES : BSIK,BSAK,BSEG.
parameters: PA_BELNR TYPE BSEG-BELNR OBLIGATORY,
            PA_BUKRS TYPE BSEG-BUKRS OBLIGATORY,
            PA_GAAHR TYPE BSEG-GJAHR OBLIGATORY.
PARAMETERS : PA_BUPLA TYPE BSEG-BUPLA NO-DISPLAY,
             PA_SECCO TYPE BSEG-SECCO NO-DISPLAY.
PA_BUPLA = 'MUM'.                               (Note : Use the Business place & section Code Used
PA_SECCO = 'MUM'.                                         in your company code).
START-OF-SELECTION.
PERFORM CHANGE_DATA.
END-OF-SELECTION.
*&      Form  CHANGE_DATA
      text
-->  p1        text
<--  p2        text
FORM CHANGE_DATA .
DATA : LT_BSEG TYPE TABLE OF BSEG WITH HEADER LINE,
       LT_BSIK TYPE TABLE OF BSIK WITH HEADER LINE,
       LT_BSAK TYPE TABLE OF BSAK WITH HEADER LINE.
BSeg updation
SELECT *
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSEG
FROM BSEG
WHERE BUKRS  = PA_BUKRS   AND
      GJAHR  = pa_gaahr   AND
      BELNR = PA_BELNR.
LOOP AT LT_BSEG.
  IF LT_BSEG-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '26'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '28'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '36'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '38'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '39'.
    LT_BSEG-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
    LT_BSEG-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
    MODIFY BSEG FROM LT_BSEG.
    Write : / LT_BSEG-BELNR, 'Update For BSEG', LT_BSEG-BSCHL,
              LT_BSEG-BUPLA,LT_BSEG-SECCO.
  ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Bsik updation
SELECT *
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSIK
FROM BSIK
WHERE BUKRS  = PA_BUKRS   AND
      GJAHR  = pa_gaahr   AND
      BELNR = PA_BELNR.
LOOP AT LT_BSIK.
  IF LT_BSIK-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '26'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '28'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '36'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '38'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '39'.
    LT_BSIK-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
    LT_BSIK-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
    MODIFY BSIK FROM LT_BSIK.
    Write : / LT_BSIK-BELNR, 'Update For BSIK', LT_BSIK-BSCHL,
              LT_BSIK-BUPLA,LT_BSIK-SECCO.
  ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
BsAk updation
SELECT *
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSAK
FROM BSAK
WHERE BUKRS  = PA_BUKRS   AND
      GJAHR  = pa_gaahr   AND
      BELNR = PA_BELNR.
LOOP AT LT_BSAK.
  IF LT_BSAK-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '26'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '28'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '36'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '38'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '39'.
    LT_BSAK-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
    LT_BSAK-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
    MODIFY BSAK FROM LT_BSAK.
    Write : / LT_BSAK-BELNR, 'Update For BSAK', LT_BSAK-BSCHL,
              LT_BSAK-BUPLA,LT_BSAK-SECCO.
  ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
ENDFORM.                    " CHANGE_DATA
Thank You.

Similar Messages

  • Down Payment Request not reflecting as a 2nd Item in Invoice

    Dear All,
    I have created a Sales Order of 10000 USD (Sales Order contains Milestone Billing Plan). I have created a Down Payment Request ZFAZ of 3000 USD. When I am creating a next Invoice in Billing Plan the Down Payment Request i created is not coming as a second Line Item so that it has to be off-set. I have checked all configurations in Copy Control.
    Could you tell me what exactly is the Issue.
    Thanks,
    Parag.

    Hi Parag
    If the downpayment process is fully configured and a downpayment is booked and cleared
    using transaction F-29 then the downpayment should be found in VF01 when the first 'real' invoice
    is created. For this to work the downpayment document (FAZ) need copy routine 020 in place
    and the 'real' billing documents need to have routine 023 in place.
    When creating a 'real' invoice the system calls function module SD_DOWNPAYMENT_READ
    and it reads the FI tables BSID/BSAD and retrieves the downpayment posted in F-29.
    If SD_DOWNPAYMENT_READ gets called and doesn't find a downpayment line
    then something is wrong with the FI posting (was it posted in F-29, are VBEL2 & POSN2 filled ?)
    If SD_DOWNPAYMENT_READ doesn't get called in VF01 sometihng is wrong with your SD
    customising. Do you have routine 023 in place.
    Check your case again and let us know how you get on
    Kind regards
    Brian

  • AP Down Payment Invoice not yet Draw Report

    Hi All,
    I'm trying to make a query of the AP Down Payment Invoice not Yet draw Report.  Can any one tell me which table I should refer when I need to make a query? I checked the ODPO tables that's no field indicate that the Downpayment not yet draw.  I also tried the ODPI table when I use that to draw the downpayment invoice to AP invoice.  When I query that table it return me 0 line. 
    Please advice.
    Looking forward advice and reply.
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    Foong Yee

    AP Down Payment Clearing Account has debit balance if it is not drawn to AP invoice.
    Use General Ledger Report,Select AP Down Payment Clearing Account,Select this G/L account,
    Select reqd. posting dates,Click Ok.
    Now you can see AP Down Payment Invoice not yet Draw Report.

  • Account 'Acquisition: down payments' could not be found for area 01

    Hi,
    In our PO there is a 8 line items. We want to create GRN by taking 2 line items at a time. It is Asset's PO and GRN. During GRN we select two line items check box including item OK check box. Click on Check button which shows as green signal. Click on POST button it shows error message as " Account 'Acquisition: down payments' could not be found for area 01". But previously lot of GRN were passed through this asset's GL account. But in asset accounting account determination is still exist against this asset. What is the probable solution ?
    Regards,
    Samrat

    Hi Venkat,
    I want to clarify one thing this 'Acquisition Down Payment' for asset accounting is required for account allocations which are used in asset classes for assets under construction. But It is not an asset under construction. No GL account was maintained against this Acquisition Down Payment before the issue raised.  Lot of entries were passed through the same GL account before. What is the reason for asking this type of GL account ?
    Regards,
    Samrat

  • Down payment document not picking up the PC , but picking up the segment

    Dear Sir/Madam,
    We are making one down payment against a Purchase order through T code: F-48 in the vendor line item we are putting the PO reference. It picks up the segment on the basis of PO, but is is not picking up the Profit center in the general ledger view. This does not allow to post the down payment entry.
    KIndly advice how the same can be resolved.
    Prashant Zinge

    Hi,
         By default the payment will go to the bank that is listed first in the vendor master. If you do not need the old details, delete them completely from the master data and leave only the new ones. Alternatively use the Partner Bank field to assign the invoice to which Bank the payment is to be made.
    Kind regards

  • Down Payment with reference capital PO (Down Payment Entry)

    Hi,
    This is regarding Down Payment entry.
    While making Down Payment with reference capital PO including taxes (f-48) we are getting the entry as below
    Vendor A/c                                                   Debit
    Asset   A/c                                                   Debit
    Cenvat Clearing A/c                                      Debit
    Cenvat Clearing A/c                                      Debit
    Input Tax Clearing A/c                                  Debit
    Bank A/c                                                      Credit
    Down Payment Clearing A/c                        Credit
    Input Tax A/c                                                Credit
    But User is asking the entry should not be like, he wants the entry should be while making F-48
    Vendor A/c                 Debit
    Bank A/c                     Credit
    We are using 4.7 version.
    someone has told me that if we implement some patches then system will show the entry whichever user is asking.
    Is it possible? Is there any solution for this?
    Please help me on this.
    Regards,
    Schilukuri

    Hi,
    No, that is not requirement.
    We will make the down payment with reference of Capital PO including taxes
    then system will generate 7 to 8 line items. But user is asking system should show only 2 line items as i said above.
    But someone has told me that if we apply some patches system will generate the entry as per user requirement.Since we are using 4.7 version.
    any one can help me on this..
    Regards,
    Schilukuri

  • Value type 61 (Down Payments) may not be carried forward in FM area

    Hi Friends,
    We have implemented Fund management in FY 2011. My requirement is i want carry forword budget down payment to nex fiscal year , plz suggest to configuration step , Process and Impact on Existing system.
    In FM budget When i  m trying to carry forward down payment which is recorded under PO through T code - "FMJ_ANZ " system showing me error.
    "Value type 61 (Down Payments) may not be carried forward in FM area 9000
    Message no. FI741
    Diagnosis
    Due to the settings for the selected update profile or due to the Customizing settings for the closing operations in FM, no carryforward is allowed in FM area 9000 for value type 61 (Down Payments) in the commitment budget and/or payment budget.
    Procedure
    Delete the entry for this value type or select a different value type, assign an update profile to the FM area which allows this value type to be carried forward, or change the Customizing settings for the closing operations in FM.
    Plz sugeest me config step, Process , and impact on existing scnerio.
    Regards
    Raheem

    Hi Team ,
    I have change Profile from "000102 to 000400 "  and allow valu type 61 for carry forward in testing server after that budget down poayment carry forward to new FY successfuly ,
    But when i am trying to make service entry sheet using ML81N system showing another error,"  098 Changing the assignment of payment or commitment budget is not allowed"  Snap shot is attached. is anything missed out.
    plz sugeest me what have to do in this case

  • Amount to draw from down payment is not set in document currency

    hi,
    i always get the error "amount to draw from down payment is not set in document currency" when i try to update a draft of invoice with down payment.
    i do the following:
    1. sales order
    2. down payment
    3. income payment
    4. delivery note
    5. invoice
    5.1 save as draft by di api
    5.2 get draft by key
    5.3 do some changes, for example change comments by di api
    5.4 update draft by diapi  <--- the error is thrown!
    If i do this on screen everything works fine. But by sdk its not working.
    System: SAP 8.8 SP00 PL20
    Is there a solution for this problem?
    best regards
    Markus

    Hi Markus,
    What if you update the same draft from UI instead of by diapi? Do you still get error message?
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Down payments status not cleared.

    Hi,
    We are working with down payments by standard customizing. Everything works fine if the Down payment request has status cleared before the invoices, however If the down payment request still with status not cleared the following invoices doesnu2019t get the down payment and we can bill all the items from the milestone billing and if the down payment still not cleared it never appear in the invoices. So at the end the sales orders have sent to the client a bigger amount. That is a situation is wrong and  we would like to avoid in order to avoid a lot of problems with our clients because the system doesnu2019t give any warning informing about you have send to the client the 120% of the sales order, if we have bill a down payment request for 20%. Our understanding the system always should get the down payment in the invoices or at least give a warning when you finish the billing without clear the down payments. We would like to know the right way to manage this situation.
    Thank you and best regards.

    HI Venkat,
    Sorry Venkat. It is the clarance in F-54 not the Revesal.
    After clearance, the amount 29.000,00 is posted to Vendor Spl GL. So nullified this account.
    Once cleared, the amount is posted to Normal Vendor ac as 34.510,00 (Doc 1700000043)
    So this doc is not picked in Payment Run.
    Invoice amount is 49.623,00-.  So the difference 15113 (49.623,00-34.510,00) should be cleared in Payment run. It is not done.
    My assumption is there is the amount difference between Normal Vendor to Speial Vendor (34,510 - 29000).  Is it the cause to not picked the doc 1700000043 in payment run.
    Please advise what I can do?
    Thanks
    Venkat

  • DP90 - Rebilling with down payment  OSS Note 858703

    Hello Gurus,
    Even configuring customers test system according above mentioned OSS Note 858703 with order type TAF I do not get the process running.... When starting order creation (VA01) system doe not allow to enter sold-to and ship-to customer numbers.
    This alone stops any testing.
    Does anyone of you has experience or at least a clue what to do to resolve this? E.g. For testing  I customized order type  TA as ZTA and same same as order tpye TAF and it was possible to enter sold-to and ship-to party.
    Any hind is very welcome as a customer waits for solution.
    Many thanks in advance!!
    Rgds, Carsten

    Carsten
    I just found out the reason why the system does not allow to enter sold-to and ship-to customer numbers:
    "There is no partner determination procedure" assigned to order type TAF". This seems to be the way SAP delivers this order type.
    So go there and assign whatever is the procedure you used for your other orders or create a new procedure and assign it, it will work fine.
    By the way billling with down payment  is not implemented at my customer site, I just tested with TAF order and it was behaving exactly as you described.
    Then on a hunch I went and saw if there is a Partner Det procedure and there is none.
    Path: SPRO/IMG/Sales and Distribution/Basic Functions/Partner Determination/Set Up Partner Determination and then
    Set Up Partner Determination for Sales Document Header/Partner Determination Procedure Assignment
    Hope this helps you, cheers.

  • Down payment is not been showed correctly at RFIDESM340 report

    Hi gurus.
    I have a problem with the report RFIDESM340. I have 2 down payments for an intracomunitary client in one invoice.
    The financial document is been showed correctly with two diferent positions for each down payment but in the RFIDESM340 report those have been group in one position for the invoice..
    Do you know to make the report to show the down payments in two different positions?
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi gurus.
    I have a problem with the report RFIDESM340. I have 2 down payments for an intracomunitary client in one invoice.
    The financial document is been showed correctly with two diferent positions for each down payment but in the RFIDESM340 report those have been group in one position for the invoice..
    Do you know to make the report to show the down payments in two different positions?
    Thanks in advance!

  • How  AP Down Payment value should reflect in BP Master GL with Gross Value

    Hi All,
    Its URGENT,  please help me with possilbe solution for,
    Scenario:- Need to make an advance payment to the vendor and the same amount need to deduct from the vendor invoice, but it should reflect in the Vendors account as a gross value like as a total material cost.
    eg:-
    AP down payment invoice request for Rs.12000/-and out going payment for the same. While posting AP invoice for 14000/-and need to adjusted Rs.12000/- as advance from the invoice.Now the vendor GL account will show the balance against this invoice is Rs.2000/- as credit.But it should show the invoice value in BP master GL as gross ie. Rs.14000/-
    Im Using SAP B1
    For further Clarification please contact:- Andrews - 9880208304 or Rohan - 9902294962
    Regards,
    Andrews.T.A

    HI
    MOVE THE SPL GL AMOUNT ie 12000 to normal gl then it iwll reflect in BP master gl also....
    see the the down payment are recorded in other gl and the invoice are recorded in other gl..
    using f.54 u have to move the spl gl to normal gl then the entry will be passed
    by debiting the BP master
    and crediting the advance gl
    then u you can match and make the payment also..
    and also check the config on the down payment how the account are mapped 
    regarads
    A.K

  • Down payment entry at MIGO

    Dear all,
    we are making down payment  with reference to PO line item & it is generating normal FI entry.But while doing MIGO it is generating another two line item for down payment.I am not able to understand this.we donot want this to happen at MIGO level.
    How to proceed now.
    Thanks
    Shivaji

    Purchase cycle starts from creation of purchase requisition ends with final payment to Vendor along with the following activities.
    1.Purchase Requisition           -     ME51N
    2.Purchase Order Creation,
          Approval and Release          -     ME21N / ME22N
    1.Down Payment Request      -     F-47
    2.Down Payment                    -     F-48 / F110
    3.Good Receipt /Service Entry  -  MIGO /  ML81N
    4.Invoice Receipt                        - MIRO
    5.Down Payment Clearing         - F-49
    6.Final Payment                         - F-53/ F110 
    Purchase Cycle Documents flow is as below: 
    1. Purchase Requisition No à Purchase Order No à Goods Receipt / Service Entry
    Material Document ßà Invoice Receipt Material Document
    2. Goods Receipt / Service Entry Material Document à Goods Receipt /Service Entry
    Accounting Document.
    3.      Invoice Receipt Material Documents à Invoice Receipt Accounting Documents 
    4.      Purchase Order No.à Down Payment Request No à  Down Payment Document No
    à Invoice Receipt à Down Payment Clearing  à Final Payment.
    5.      Material /Vendor à Purchase Requisition à Purchase order à Material documents for Goods Receipt /Invoice Receipt
    6.      Purchase Organization à Material/Vendor/ Plant/ Purchase Requisition à Purchase Order à Material Documents for Goods Receipt / Invoice Receipt
    7.      Cost Object à Purchase Requisition à Purchase Order à Material Documents for Goods Receipt / Invoice Receipt à Accounting Documents for Goods Receipt/ Invoice Receipt à Payment Documents
    As the purchase cycle processes through both Logistics and Finance modules and to view and analyze finance relevant information requires combining of data from SAP Tables related to both the modules as below:   Material Data
    Hope this will help you for understanding.
    pherasath

  • Material regrouping in MM02 not reflecting in COPA report

    Hi,
    In my project during data conversion material was grouped wrongly. We realised it later once we started designing COPA reports. The material is used by seven company codes. The basic material group defined in basic data is used by all company codes while Material group 1,2,3 4 and 5 are used by company specific defined in sales orgs 2 View in MM master(MM01).
    I am designing report for three companies by using material group 1,2,3,4 and 5.
    We tried changing the material group 1,2,3,4 and 5 for wrongly grouped materials in MM02. But in COPA report these changes are not reflecting. The grouping in report is still as per the data conversion grouping.
    Please suggest on how should we rectify our material grouping to reflect in COPA report.
    Regds

    Hi,
    in COPA reports characteristics are read from the COPA tables, they are not dynamically derived at the time of executing the report. In the COPA tables oyu will find the characteristic as derived at the moment of posting the line item.
    If the characeristic that you want to rectify is in the definition of your your COPA segments - which you can check through TC KEQ3 - then there is possibility to carry changed master data over to past COPA data.
    TC KEND allows you change the existing COPA segments according to current master data. However, it will not make changes to table CE1XXXX, where COPA line items are stored, but changes happen on the segment level (CE4XXXX).
    This means that you always see the changes in COPA reports that read from segments, but not in line item based reports.
    To change your output from line item based reports I see no other possibilty but to make correcting entries in CE1XXXX using KE21N or KEFC.
    If you should consider using KEND please read the documentation for "realignment". It can create problems, for example if you have a SAP BW that is delta-updated from CE11XXX. Also your summarization levels for COPA have to be rebuilt after KEND.

  • A/R down payment invoice not allowing tax

    Hi Experts,
    We use SAP Business One 2007A PL-08. While posting A/R down payment with percentage on DPM (For example 50%), the system is not calculating GST on it though we put the GST tax code in the invoice.
    Any idea how this can be resolved?
    Is there a workaround for this?
    Thank you,

    Thanks Gordon. As a workaround, we created a dummy item number for the GST to be input into the A/R Down payment invoice. The problem here is that when we add a line item for the GST using this item number, the G/L account is defaulting to customer deposits account and its now allowing us to change the G/L account to the relevant GST G/L. Is there a way we can change the G/L?
    Please let me know!!
    Thanks

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem when i try to modifi and save a query

    Dear SDN Members I have the follow error when I try to save a query (after to modified a Variable) - The system tried to insert a data record, even though a data record with the same primary key already exists - An exception with the type CX_SY_OPEN_

  • How can I get the Java EE 5 Compatibility Test Suite?

    How can I get the Java EE 5 Compatibility Test Suite? which department should I contact with in oracle company in china ? Who can tell me? thanks.

  • Recent File List on Getting Started Window

    Displays last two projects and most recent files.  As everything I do is project-based, I would like to display more than 2 or the entire list as most recent projects.  Is this possible with an ini setting? TIA Bill F

  • Suggested locations in Calendar spectacularly wrong

    The OS X Calendar app will suggest locations as I enter text into the location field of an appointment; but in practice, it does a terrible (technically, an astonishingly terrible) job of suggesting things, proposing locations that are continents awa

  • Upgraded but now I only see a big black square instead of video.

    specify your operating system (including 32bit or 64bit); Windows XP Service Pack 3, but I don't know how to check what bit. specify your web browser and version (including 32bit or 64bit); IE-7 says 128bit. specify your Flash Player version (check h