Payment orders in f110 when instructions (fields DTWS*) are involved

Hi, hope you can help me to solve following issue:
When i prepare payment orders in payment program ( F110 ) invoices that have differente instructions ( values in fields DTWS* in invoices ) are not grouped together for payment by the payment program on default.
Is there any way to make system to group such invoices. I'm interested in technical solution because we are using instructions
( fields DTWS* ) not as standart system means ( I think it is to create diffirente payment media ) but to hold some user defined specifications.
Thanks beforehand for any contribution.

Hello,
there are two notes which explain the grouping of documents in f110. I'm not acessing the marketplace now but if you search the notes you'll find one called: Unninteligible grouping of documents ( component FI-ap-ap-b ). This note explain the steps the f110 perform to group the documents in a payment run.
It can help you to understand the program and meet your business requirements.
REgards,
REnan Correa

Similar Messages

How to handle transactions when two different databases are involved.

consider two tables namely Table-A and Table-B part of two different databases namely ORACLE and MYSQL.
Now the project requirement is updating the Table-A(ORACLE) and Table-B (MYSQL) as one transaction. i.e. either update both the tables or rollback both the tables.
Now my question is how could i handle this situation using JDBC(Type-4) driver.Because i think at a time only one JDBC driver can be loaded into the JVM.

NareshAnkuskani wrote:
Now my question is how could i handle this situation using JDBC(Type-4) driver.Because i think at a time only one JDBC driver can be loaded into the JVM.No, that is not true.
But anyway, you need to use distributed (XA) transactions. i believe that the latest version (5.0) of mysql actually has support for XA transactions. you need to use a to setup a distributed transaction and attach the connections for the two databases to that transaction. then it should function as you desire.

Payment Order delted

Dear All
For processing vendor payment we run APP and once close the proposal system generate the payment order. Later we upload the payment details in the HSBC website. After that signatory approves the payment and then payments are processed in the bank. Next day when we upload the EBS sytem clears the vendor open items with reference to payment order. Sometime when we load the payment details in the bank website, some of the payments rejected by the signatory. We then delete the payment order and then rest of the payments are processed.
System stores the data for payment order in (REGUH and REGUP) and( PYORDH and PYORDP) tables. Once we delete the payment order system remove the data from P* tables but in R* tables information remains there. But there is no indicator in Rseries tables that payment order is deleted and once the EBS is upload all the information from P series tables are deleted for payment order. Is there any way we can find out which payment order user deletes and which payment order are deleted fromP* series table results in clearing from EBS.
We need this to print the payment advice only for the payment order which are not deleted by user
Thanks and Best Regards
Farhan Qaiser

OK The posting run date is a reference date -
The posting date is when the actual payment posting date will be and the date of the clearing of open items
Docs entered up to field - looks at when documents have been posted i.e. entry date
Items due by - is the due date of documents to be included in the payment run.
Further to this you need to enter the next payment run date. This is used for cash discounts, if a Vendor has a cash discount payment term it will include the invoice for payment if the date used in the next payment run would mean cash discount would not be available.

Indicator "Payment order created"

Hi gurus,
Help me please with the following problem.
I have accounting document (incoming invoice) in the system and it has indicator "Payment order created". So that means that payment order must exist concerned with this accounting document.
But in reality there is no any payment orders concerned with this accounting document (there is no any records in table PYORDP for my acc. doc.)
I guess that payment order was deleted but for some reason indicator in acc. doc remained.
And now as the result it's impossible to clear acc.doc.
What should I do to delete this indicator?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Sunny
Please check the transaction code for configuration of your payment program. In the Payment method/country, you wold have a tick mark for the option "payment order only". When this tick is there, the entry will be posted only after the bank statements are posted.
Please review this configuration. Also check the link below in order to get more information.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/01/a9c2b5455711d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Hope this helps. Please let me know if you need anything on this. Also please do award points if found useful.
Karthik

Table/field/report showing approver of payment run in F110

After reviewing the payment proposal in F110, supervisor approves the Payment Run by clicking u201CStart immediatelyu201D in Schedule Payment pop-up.
For audit purposes, we need to view who approved specified payment runs. Anyone knows the table, field, or report would contain that information?
Appreciate any help.

They're a document that records when things get changed. "Things" includes pretty much anything from material master to sales orders, hence "general".
But It isn't enabled by default for all tables, mainly for performance reasons. Is it enabled for the relevant REG.... table(s) in the data dictionary? You might need to check with a basis guy or abapper.
I'd say enabling it is simpler than modding the standard programs and tables, like by adding fields to REGUV.

Unnecessary payment orders generated in F110

Hi All,
F110 is generating unnecessary payment orders for a particular Company Code for two of its vendors. This issue came up only for one company code in the system. I am wondering as unnecessay payment orders got generated for two vendors of a company code for no apparent reason. Please help me if you have any clues.
Thanks & Regards
Aparna

Dear,
are You using F110 automatic payment? What do You inserted into the field Next payment date into the parameter tab?
the help on line says:
Posting Date of the next Payment Run
Use
This date is needed in order to check the due date of payables. If an item is already overdue on the date of the next payment run, or would lose cash discount, the system pays the item in this payment run.
The general rule for receivables is that they cannot be paid until the baseline date for payment has been reached. Such items are paid on or after the baseline date for payment, regardless of when the next payment run is scheduled for.
I hope this helps.
Mauri

F110 - one spool request number per payment order --URGENT

Hi folks,
I am ABAPer working for ECC6 upgrade project when i am running F110 payment run for customers to generate payment orders i am getting all the orders in one spool request no, But i need to generate one spool request no. per payment order.
thanks in advance for you valuble inputs
regards,
ramahari

Hi Madhuri,
Call open form write form and close form in loop so that till sales order remains in the loop the form will continue to print. In this way all sales order in internal table will print in the same spool.
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Vijay

F111 and payment method field 'payment orders only' deactivated T042ZL-XNOP

Hi
F111 gives an error for a payment method: "Creation of payment orders is not supported. Message no. PZ588.
Diagnosis
Payment method B is configured so that a payment order is created. This function is not supported in the payment program for payment requests. This payment method is not permitted here."
The cause is field 'payment orders only'T042ZL-XNOPO in FBZP of the payment method, which means no clearing of open items during payment run. Business reason for having this parameter activated: "As per the legal regulation in Poland, the vendor liability in your books cannot be cleared during Payment run. The vendor liability in your books can be cleared only after receiving confirmation from bank about the payment having been made to the vendors account.
Hence only Payment orders are created during SAP payment run ( no FI posting) ..The DME files generated are sent to the bank. After the confirmation is received from bank ( via the bank statements imported thru EBS) that the funds have been actually transferred to the vendor account, the vendor liability is cleared off form your books"
I do not want to use F110 because I do not want to use customers or vendors but I want to use GL accounts. Business is against creating a separate payment method with field 'payment orders only' T042ZL-XNOPO deactivated.
Any suggestion?

Since your requirement is with reference to GL accounts then F111 is the correct tcode. Payment request is created (trx RVND) and in this case can be processed only by SAPF111S via trx F111.
But to use tr. F111, a payment request should not contain a payment method, marked with "Payment order only" (tr. FBZP).
In your case it is correct that such an error PZ588 is generated since such payment methods are not supported by F111.
So please ensure that payment request may not contain a payment method, marked with "Payment order only".
Hope this information helps.
Kind Regards
Soumya

F110 - Payment order number not deleted after Feban posting

Hello,
I have problem regarding Payment order deletion. End user creates Bank statement (FF67) using Payment order(F110) number. Then with Feban end user posts document. Normally after Feban posting payment order number disappearing (we can see this number in tables such pyordh, reguh et c.). If we want to see Payment order number (using t-code F110) system gives such error - "No payment orders exist for this selection
Message no. FZ084
Diagnosis
No payment orders exist for the selections made. This may be because the relevant account statement has already been imported".
But in this case it is not disappeared and end user can use Payment order number second time in t-code FF67 and post in in Feban.
Thanks and Regards,
Sabuhi Gaflanov

HI Carlos,
Since you archived PO, it is stored in archive physical drive not in SAP drive.
when u use me23n, the archived PO is picking from physical drive and it says "Already archived" message.
I'm sure there will be no table level entries for the archived documents
Go to SARA transaction - information system--> Archive Explorer - MM_EKKO and execute.
Check your PO is listed here.
So if you dont want to see your PO, then you need to De-activate information system
in SARA-Information System-->Customizing -
search infrastructure by Object name and use activate/deactivate icon -
A question i really need to know - Why you want to delete a particular PO, Archival process is not a small thing and usually it takes place as a MASS activity.
reg,
bhg

Payment Order generation through F110

Hi Dear one,
Our business requirment is they want to run the payment order based on Vendor invoice due dates(eg:if one vendor has number of invoices we want to run the payment based on invoices due dates )
your intime reply is highly appreciated
Thanks & Regards
Vyshnava

Hi Trinath,
No additional configuration is required. However specify following in co.code pymt method,
select with a tick
Foreign Vendor allowed,
Foreign currency allowed and
Customer Vendor bank abroad allowed.
What chris mentioned was the main key. If a particular USD invoice needs to paid in INR,then edit the original invoice and change the payment currency to INR. If you don't see payment currency field, edit vendor/posting key FSG. That's it.
Thanks Chris once again.
Regards,
Sam

Unnecessary payment order getting generated in F110

Hi All,
F110 is generating unnecessary payment orders for a particular Company Code for two of its vendors. Please provide me any clue helpful to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards
Aparna

Hi All,
This issue came up only for one company code in the system. I am wondering as unnecessay payment orders got generated for two vendors of a company code for no apparent reason. Please help me if you have any clues.
Thanks & Regards
Aparna

F110 Message : Payment order created, invoice not paid.

Dear,
All Experts.
I have done F110, I am getting this message :-
Payment order 1000000454 for RUB 14.998,00- was generated for payment method T
In F110 I can see the payment order report also, but why invoice is not getting paid ?
Or I am missing something process ? Or is it having to do with FBZP configuration part.
Note :- It is happening almost with all documents and I dont want to take print out from SAP, just regular payment run is the scenarion.
How to stop this or how to proceed further to get out og this ?
Regards,
Sharvari Joshi.

Hi,
Go to FBZP > Payment Method at country level
and check whether the payment order creation is activated for this payment method.
If payment order is activated, then the system will not pay the invoice immediatly, but will clear based on the final bank statement coming for this payment.
You can remove that tick and then after running the payment run, the items will get paid immediatly.
Regards,
SDNer

Payment orders when a customer has a credit balance

Hello,
I was able to generate a payment order for a customer. But when a customer has a credit note attached to it that it effectively renders the total as a credit balance, I am unable to do so. When I select on the credit note, it comes up with an error "Enter a payment method for outgoing payments". Is there a way, that I could overcome this error without creating another payment method? Because its possible for this company that the customer can have credit balance even though we should just be collecting money from them.
Thanks and regards,
Tess

Hi,
It is a SAP a standard behavior in case of Debit balance of Vendor or Credit balance of Customer it gives as an error.
Hence, in this case we need to do manual clearing through F-44 for Vendor and F-32 for Customer.
Regards,
Tejas

Hi, I have on my credit card monthly payments of fertilizer, and when I want to reveal to LR I get a reading indicating I should renew the subscription in order to use this function, alguine can help me ?? thx

Hi, I have on my credit card monthly payments of fertilizer, and when I want to reveal to LR I get a reading indicating I should renew the subscription in order to use this function, alguine can help me ?? thx

Thanks John, but this way is you get to this forum marinate options were
not available
2015-01-12 22:21 GMT-03:00 John T Smith <[email protected]>:
Hi, I have on my credit card monthly payments of fertilizer, and when
I want to reveal to LR I get a reading indicating I should renew the
subscription in order to use this function, alguine can help me ?? thx
created by John T Smith <https://forums.adobe.com/people/JohnTSmith> in *Adobe
Creative Cloud* - View the full discussion
<https://forums.adobe.com/message/7089860#7089860>

Payment order are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
Would you please help me with the message below. It appears on F110 when I try to pay a vendor open item with extended withholding tax:
Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
any help is welcome

The payment method "Y" the option "payment order only" was marked?
For a withholding tax type with accumulation in a company code with extended withholding tax payment
methods that create only payment orders can´t be used. Payment orders can only be created only if there are
no tax types with accumulation involved in the paid items of the payment run.
The functionality extended withholding tax works fine for Brazil
however, you can´t use the payment order with this functionality.
Please, review your customizing for payment method 'Y" in transaction
FBZP.
Best regards,
Leonardo Vedovelli
FI Support Engineer
SAP Active Global Support

Payment orders in f110 when instructions (fields DTWS*) are involved

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for