Payment run issue

Hi,
When payment run of a doc for 2009 is carried out cheque is printed but clearing no. has not been assigned in system.
Please let me know what needs to be done in this situation.

We've had that happen before.  We use F110 to produce all of our checks.  Under the status tab, the log displays Posting Orders: # generated, # completed.  And one day for one run, those numbers did not match.  The check was created but there was no clearing doc number created.  We also noticed an errror in the BASIS log SM13.  We had to void the check - I think with tcode FCH9 - so that the payment program would pick up the invoice(s) again.
In the future if you don't want that to happen again, then under your check variant, under the Output control section, there is a setting "Payment Document Validation".  Before using it, please read the F1 help on that setting to make sure that it fits your process.  Otherwise, we monitor our SM13 log daily to more quickly flag when a posting update does not happen.
Cindy

Similar Messages

  • Automatic Payment Run Issue

    Hi,
    In my company I want to do the automatic payment run with the customer setoff & customer open items document  currency is USD & vendor document currency is LKR .I want to do the payment run in LKR.(My company code currency is LKR) I have defined the payment method "C" in both the Master data ( Customer and Vendor). Now I am trying to run Automatic Payment Program. But system shows all Customer invoice in exception list and display the following given below message. Can I run the automatic payment program using difference currencies? Please advice me to resolve the above issue.
    Further this process I am doing for LKR customer & vendors & its working fine without giving any issues.
    Enter a payment method for incoming payments
    Message no. FZ010
    Diagnosis
    The balance of the items to be paid requires a payment method for incoming payments. You specified a payment method that is defined for outgoing payments.
    System Response
    The payment method is rejected.
    Procedure
    Enter a payment method for incoming payments
    Thanks
    Chrishantha

    Hi,
    I have created incomming payment method under this company code & asing to the customer master records.
    How can I select multiple payment method at the time of doing auto payment run
    Further , I didn't do any changes in vendor master records since I have to do the outgoing payment also
    Please advice
    Regards
    Chrishantha

  • F110 Payment run issue

    Hi,
    We have created a payment run 1a  for a range o vendors  1 - 200  scheduled the payment run, vendor no 10 was included. Then 10 mins later scheduled another payment run for vendor number 10 only the payment run was scheduled. Now the issue is for both payment runs the backgorund jobs are still running after 4 hours!
    In FBL1n for the vendor 10 invoices have been cleared by both payment runs, which is ok.  In SM50 both background jobs I can see they are stuck in program "CL_BCS_EMAIL_ADDRESS==========CP"  this is the part of the BTC used to determine the email address of the vendor.
    Has anyone come across this issue before?
    thanks
    Joe

    Hi,
    yes, though couldn't figure out the reason, however if you check SP02 in the spool area you will be able to view all the advices.
    best regds
    Subha

  • Payment run issue F110

    Dear all,
    we recently migrated from 4.6 to 6.0.
    For our small subsidiaries, we have a program to load vender's invoices without specifying payment method and house bank.
    Before migration, F110 took the payment method and house bank from vendor´s master data. F110 didn't cause problems whenever there was only one payment method in vendor's master data specified.
    After migration, F110 dosen't find payment method and house bank anymore. All invoices without payment method and house bank specified in the invoice document, appear like an exception in the payment run.
    Is there anything I can do to make it work as before?
    Regards,
    Claudia.

    Hi Kris and Mahesh,
    this is all checked.
    The message which is displayed is that there is no valid payment method found.
    But we didn't change anything, just after the migration it stopped working.
    Housebank has the same currency and payment method as vendor's master.
    I compared two invoice documents before and after migration, they are exactly the same and vendors master data wasn't modified since 2006.
    This happens for all of our small subsidiaries using a program to load invoices which doesn't include payment method or house bank info.
    Regards
    Claudia.

  • Vendor - Payment run issue

    Hi All,
    When we run the payment run, we are having problems with some of the vendors, because even they are set as payment method "T", transfers; when we run the payment run it shows as "C" payment with check.
    Kindly, advise me on the same.
    Quick response will be appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards

    hi,
    Payment method entered in vendor master will only default it while posting any document for the vendor. It can be changed during document entry and the Pymt method entered in doc will only be considered for F110.
    So check in documents posted for that vendor.
    Assign points if useful
    Regards
    Raghu Ram

  • Payment run F110 & CIS Issues

    We have come accross and issue when doing a payment run, for suppliers which should have CIS deducted. As per the recent notes, we have configured the system for CIS (Classic). The issue arises becasue as per the notes, we store the Supplier UTR number in the exemption field QSZNR in the master record. If we store this there, when the payment run is made, there is nothing deducted from the supplier for the CIS, and the full amount of the invocie is paid accross. If we leave the number out, it works fine.
    Has anyone else encountered this issue?

    If anyone has seen this problem, could they let me know. I think we may have a tick missing somewhere which says if an exemption field completed, deduct the CIS.
    Much appreciated in advance.

  • Issues with payment run

    Hi All,
    I am facing with a issue with payment run FPY1. Some of the customers are refunded the amount which is not supposed to be refunded to them. When i check the Contract account level and document level, at both level there is no outgoing payment method set. Is there any other way by which payment run would pick up the amount and refund it back to custmer.
    Kindly share your thoughts.
    Regards,
    Rahul

    Do you have a third level of master data?  In certain FI-CA systems there is a lower level of master data (i.e. contract, insurance object).  A payment method can also be set at this level.

  • Payment Run Programe Issue Duplicate Enrty in REGUH & REGUP

    Dear All
    I am facing a problem in F-58 transaction, I have developed customized Cheque format in Smartforms, and I customized the standard payment run program RFFOUS_C to ZRFFOU_C, when I payment with F-58 my predefine format will be printout, it is working fine but some time payment tables(REGUH & REGUP) have duplicate the payment Item anybody have some idea or solution whatu2019s goes wrong. Followings are sample entry
    BKPF Entry                                                                               
    MANDT BUKRS BELNR                GJAHR BLART BLDAT         BUDAT           MONAT           CPUDT
      100         2000   1500003026  2010    KZ       07.04.2010 07.04.2010    10 07.04.2010 11:02:47       
    REGUH Entry
      MANDT LAUFD      LAUFI   ZBUKR LIFNR      KUNNR EMPFG VBLNR      AVISG WAERS
       100   07.04.2010 00001O  2000   0000120886             1500003026       PKR 
      100   07.04.2010 00002O   2000   0000120886             1500003026       PKR   
    REGUP ENTRY
    MANDT LAUFD      LAUFI  XVORL ZBUKR LIFNR      KUNNR EMPFG VBLNR      BUKRS BELNR                                                                               
    100   07.04.2010 00001O       2000   0000120886             1500003026 BPL   1500003026
    100   07.04.2010 00001O       2000   0000120886             1500003026 BPL   1500003026
    100   07.04.2010 00002O       2000   0000120886             1500003026 BPL   1500003026
    100   07.04.2010 00002O       2000   0000120886             1500003026 BPL   1500003026
    Thanks In Advance

    The field LAUFI (additional identification) is used to distinguish between several runs with the same reconciliation key date. You can freely define the identification.So multiple entries are result of multiple runs.

  • DME file issue: Payment run for Customers

    Hi Gurus,
    Please help me in the following problem.
    I have done the configurations for automatic collection/refund using F110 for customers in our ECC 6 system. Iu2019m having a requirement as below.
    1. Singular payments to be made for each customer transaction.  Have done that by checking u2018Singular paymentsu2019 check box in customer master data.
    2. All payments should be collected in DME file at customer level even though the payments are multiple.   have done that by customizing the RFFOGB_T program.
    3. Configurations are done for incoming (Receivables) and outgoing payments (refunds) in SAP and working fine.
    Now the problem is, there is a requirement to net-off the monetary value of a customer in DME file i.e. if a customer having debits and credits then we need to net off the amounts and check whether itu2019s an incoming or outgoing payment to that customer. I have done the code changes for this requirement as well and it is working perfectly fine, however DME file produces 2 CONTRA lines one as debit to bank account and another as Credit to bank account (provided I have 2 customers in a run where one customer ends up in net debit balance, and another customer ends up with net credit balance). Our Bank doesn't accept more than one CONTRA in a single DME file.
    Example scenario:
    Customer1
    Booking 1  -> 400 (Dr) & 200 (Cr)
    Booking 2  -> 300 (Dr) & 100 (Cr)
    Customer2
    Booking 3 -> 100 (Dr) & 300 (Cr)
    Currently If I run the payment run by having both incoming and outgoing payment methods, then my DME file will result as below
    Customer 1 -> Dr 400
    Customer 2 -> Cr 200
    Bank account -> Cr 200
    However our bank is not accepting the above DME since there are debits as well as credit data records in the same file.
    Currently we are going with 2 separate payment runs, one for incoming and another for outgoing by this I could able to produce 2 DME files as below for the above customer bookings.
    Payment run 1:
    DME 1:
    Customer 1 -> Dr 700
    Customer 2 -> Dr 100
    Bank account -> Cr 800
    Payment run 2:
    DME 2:
    Customer 1 -> Cr 300
    Customer 2 -> Cr 300
    Bank account -> Dr 600
    Both files are being accepted by Bank, however business is not agreeing this since for every customer transaction bank charges client. (There will be 2 transaction for same customer in the same day)
    Anybody encountered the same problem? I need some suggestion on how to produce 2 DME files in a single payment run, one having only net debit balance customers and another having only net credit balance customers, so that on a particular payment run a customer will have only one transaction going into bank either Credit or Debit. Basically I need to produce DME files as below for the above customer bookings
    Payment Run 1:
    DME 1:
    Customer 1 -> Dr 400
    Bank account -> Cr 400
    DME 2:
    Customer 2 -> Cr 200
    Bank account -> Dr 200
    Please help.

    Client has a difft scenario.
    They pay to the customers for warranty and incentives. 2 ways to pay to the customer: generating payment run F110 within AR and the other being F110 from AP where all the customer open items are closed and sent to AP for payment using a custom program.
    The problem with this is they have two interfaces each from AP and AR and aslo a custom program.
    Now, solution is to pay all customers thru AP by setting each customer as vendor so that all the open items are picked in the payment run.
    Next solution is to have single interface but paymentruns seperately from AR and AP. Both would send the files differently to Bank when paymnt run executed. Concern here is when both Ar and AP send files will the interface be able to handle it like 2 difft files or should there be any consolidation kind of thing.
    Another question is, do we have to set up all customers as vendors in order to pay to the customer thru AP. There is customer accounts field where range of customer accounts can be added. Just by adding customer accounts, does it pick up the items for payment.
    Please reply.
    Satya

  • Issue with Payment Run (FPY1)

    Hi Gurus, need you help. I am getting the following message when executing the FPY1. Exceptions        1 Message no. MASSACT101 Diagnosis Counter Exceptions has value        1. For a more precise description of counter Click Here. Counter in Payment Program: Items with Exception Indicator Definition Number of items that cannot be paid and that have been placed in the list of payment exceptions. Each payment exception is classified using the item indicator (data element POKEN_PAY). For each item indicator, you can define whether these exceptions are to be included in the clarification worklist of the payment run.

    Hi Aravind
    Payments which cannot be made through FPY1 are caught in the exceptions. You can view the exception list by checking on the excpetion checkbox. Each exception corresponds to an item indicator (POKEN_PAY). Check for what item indicator, you are getting an exception. The solution is based on the type of exception.
    check the screenshot below
    regards
    debashish

  • Issue with payment run

    hi guru's
    We have one vendor in two company code one is India and one is USA. The bank account number  is different in vendor master data but both accounts in the same country.
    When we make the payment run it has to split to different account based on the currency say for example in this case INR and USD.
    What we are doing at the moment  is whenever we want to make payment to say for example bank account 123456789 we will delete one bank in master data that is 987654321  and make payment. Whenever we want to make payment to 987654321 we will delete 123456789 bank in the master data and make payment.
    Is there any alternative way to split payment according to two bank or 3 banks based on the vendor master data?
    Thanks
    Sunitha

    I don't know a way to split, but to make separate payments you do not need to change the vendor master all the time.  In the vendor master, assign a unique value in the field BnkT for each bank account that you have in the vendor master; this 4-character value is free text (you can enter anything you want as long as you can distinguish).  You then enter this key while entering vendor invoice in SAP (either via FB60 or MIRO).  You will see the field as "Part. Bank" in Payment tab of FB60/MIRO.  The payment program then pays the item via that bank in the vendor master to which this key is assigned.

  • URGENT---Automatic payment run-Vendor open item clearing

    When I run the payment program, it ran without any error, however, the vendor account was not cleared. The balance in GL and Vendor account remains the original amounts. And the Vendor line items which were supposed to be cleared thru F110, are now showing as Open items.
    please give me the TCODES to look in.
    Please help.
    Thanks in advance
    Sharath

    Dear Sharath,
    To check whether your payment run has actually generated any payment document or not, please follow the following steps:-
    (1) Go to transaction SE16/ SE16N and table REGUH, give the "payment run ID", "run date" and "Proposal Indicator as blank".
         It should show the payment document.
    (2) If (1) above show payment document, then go to table REGUP and check the invoices paid.
       If invoices are there in REGUP, then there might be some issue in the payment document updation in the system which you can check via transaction SM12. (For this just check in table REGUV, whether payment documents created and posted are equal or not for the payment run.)
    (3) if (1) do not show any payment document, that means payment run has not made any payment.
        In this case, you create a new payment run and in the parameters select the error logs display also and in free selection give the document number you are expecting to be paid off by the payment run. This might help you to know the reason of non payment by cheking the proposal log/ payment run log.
    I hope that this should assist you
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • Clearing of Open items - Critera - Auotomatic Payment Run

    Dear Friends,
    We have configured the Automatic Payment Run in the system and are in the process of maintaining the integration with the Bank. When we import the Electronic Bank Statement, we find that instaed of 'Value Date' some otehr reference gets populated in the assignment field in the line item for Bank Clearing Account, thus rendering it difficult to perform automatic clearing of open items. The first question is how to check what information is getting populated and why? Is there a way to find it out ?
    Another thing is that we have been advised to maintain the substitution rule so that instead of some other reference, the Value Date gets substituted in the Assignment Field? Need the help of experts in finding out which information gets populated in the Assignment Field and second what is the method and config maintainence required for defining the Substitution Rule so that the Value Date gets captuerd in the Assignment Feild and which would help in perfroming the automatic clearing of open items.
    Thanks in advance!
    Regards,

    Hi,
    Thanks for the prompt response. In FF.5 while importing the Bank Statement, the box for "Assign Value Date" was checked and in the GL Master of the Bank Clearing Account, the Sort Key has also been defined as 027 (Value Date). Even then in the line item posting for Bank Clearing Account, the reference from Document Header Text (Field Name BKTXT) gets populated in the Assignment Feild. Now the issue is that this field needs to be substituted with the value date. How to define the Substitution Rule? Another issue is what should be the second criteria defined in the system for clearing the Open Items in the Bank Clearing Account, since for the same value date there could be two identical items and only one may be cleared from the bank and other one may be outstanding?
    Help from experts who have configured e banking would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks!
    Regards

  • Automatic payment run - F110 for range of periods

    Dear Friends,
    In Automatic Payment Run - is it possible to run for the particular period or range of periods as i need to take 14 days data  .
    As i need to take only previous 14 days data only
    Say for eg. I have  customer  who is having open item from Period 01-02-2011 to till date 27-03-2011.
    eg : it should take the open item in between period of  13-03-2011 to 27-03-2011.
    as this need to dymanic 
    Help me to solve this issue.
    Kind Regards,
    sarfraz

    If you can't use the fields on the Parameter tab, then try the Free Selections tab.  If that doesn't suffice, then use the BTE for payment blocking and item exclusion - Process 1820.

  • Automatic Payment Run - Clearing of the Open Items

    Dear Forum,
    We have an issue with the clearing of the open items in the Bank Clearing Account. While creating the payment run, the credit to the Bank Clearing Account happens with the Value Date getting updated in the Assignment Field. However, after we import the Electronic Bank Statement, we do not find the Value Date updated in the Assignment Field in the entry for debit to the Bank Clearing Account, and instead some other reference appears in the Assignment Field. The issue is in such a case how could we perform the automatic clearing of the open items. Is it that we need to do some maintenance in SAP or do we need to get some thing done on the Bank side.
    Also if the criteria for clearing the open items is value date, how would the system behave in case the value date is same for two identical items and only one has been cleared from the Bank...how would the system know which one to be cleared.
    Help in this regard would be highly appreciated.
    Regards

    Hi Raj,
    Basically assignment field is used to enter the cheque/ dd number or bank transfer doc number. Thi facilitate the refernce for the system. If you use this then the problem of checks with sam valudate & amount will automatically get resolved.
    Regards

Maybe you are looking for

  • Merging multiple libraries

    On my C drive under Music- Itunes, I have multiple Itunes libraries.  There are some duplicates (don't get me started on that !).  There are regular music libraries and xml libraries.  How do I consolidate them all into one, so that when I un-install

  • Can anyone help unlock my Droid 4 ?  (phone now in UK)

    In the UK we don't get any QWERTY keypads with Touchscreen other than Blackberry, so, seeing the great Droid 4 we set about getting one.  BUT, can't unlock it from Verizon to use on 3 (UK network) I don't have any original account details but have th

  • Thinking about the total cost of ownership (TCO) of BI?

    Hi there, I lead the survey research conducted by Aberdeen Group. We are conducting a survey right now that will reveal your peers insights and experiences (and yours, if you participate) regarding managing the total cost of ownership of BI. I ask tw

  • Please help me find a good MP3 tagger for Mac

    I have switched to Mac. I am now organizing my music properly, with Lyrics, Art, genre's, etc. iTunes does a good job at some things for tagging but not others. I used to use some good apps on Win XP but they dont work on Mac. Can someone recommend g

  • Getting rid of Entourage

    I using OS X 10.6.5 and at one time had Entourage 2008 installed which I no longer use except I can't get rid of an Entourage Calendar from appearing in iCal. I have deleted everything I can find on my system related to Entourage and it won't go away