Payment setoff between Vendor and Alternative payee vendor

Hi
It is assumed that if a vendor account points to another vendor account for payment i.e Alternate Payee vendor, the two account balances will be combined into one payment.  This is currently not happening. 
A separate payment is issued under each vendor account.(i.e Original vendor and the Alternative payee vemdor).
For an example a vendor that is linked to another for payment but there is a credit sitting on the Payee account that is not getting offset against the other invoices paid to the vendor.
Note: Both Original vendor and Alternative payee vendor are created as vendors and payments are due to both the vendors.
Regards

Hi,
Your assumption does work in our system (604). 
This was the test I ran.
Created main vendor.
Created invoices and credit memo.
Went back and updated vendor record to add an Alternative Payee.
Then created additional invoices but still used the main vendor number.
Ran F110 and all invoices and credit memo entered above paid to the Alternative Payee - non to Main Vendor but clearing docs are still under the Main Vendor under FBl1n.
I think that is what you were wanting to work in yours?  Correct?
Some questions for you:
1. Did you check to see if there are any OSS notes?  like 1449061 or 1432181 that may apply?
2. Did you confirm that both the main vendor and the alternative payee have the same payment methods??
3. Have you analyzed the invoices/credit memos that the system is still paying on the main vendor to see what may be different about those?  For example are you using payment method supplement?

Similar Messages

  • Difference between Preffered Vendor and Normal/Fixed Vendor

    Hi Experts,
    Can any one tell me the difference between Preffered Vendor and Normal/Fixed Vendor . And the concept behind
    those.
    Thanks in Advance.

    what is difference between preferred and ordinary vendor, partial conf&conf

  • Employee Vendor and Third Party Vendor Posting Issue

    Dear Experts,
    I have an issue while Posting of Employee Vendor and Third Party Vendor.
    In T706K table, maintained symbolic account offset entry MJ90 Wage Type but its asking for Symbolic Exp account too. Otherwise, while posting its says Trip has no postable entries.
    I should get entry in FB03 as mentioned below
    Employee Vendor   (Dr)
    Service Tax            (Dr)
    Third Party Vendor  (Cr)
    Awaiting for quick response.
    Regards
    Shaik

    Hi Sieg,
    Thanks for your reply.
    Company has given Forex advance to employee via third party vendor
    So, We need to debit the amount into Employee Vendor and Credit into Third Party Vendor
    For Ex: Third Party Vendor is Thomas Cook (Forex Provider)
    Please guide me how to post the above entry in Standard.
    Regards
    Shaik

  • Automatically populate the Vendor and tick SC Vendor box in the PO

    Hello Gurus,
    How can I automatically populate the Vendor and tick SC Vendor box in the delivery address tab in the Purchase order?
    Thanks!

    Hi  
    I am  not sure  what  business process  you would like to  map  .Is it  subcontractor  order  or   the  business  would like to send the  component specific address every time which is different then Vendor master address.
    If this  is the case  then the  SC vendor   should be  ON. This  is manual  process  there is no seting  to update this selection  automatic.
    Also  if  the  above process is  repeated   process  . you  can  do  the  checkbox  customized in the 'Reference data, item' Field Selection Group as  required field . Every  time user has  flag  this field   before saving of  PO.  But this is  also not correct solution it  will affect all  type  PO.
    Thanks
    Dilip

  • How expired mat. sent back to vendor and credit the vendor account for that

    actually, initially at the time of SAP implementation,some stocks of material uploded directly by 561. now, some of this stock are expired so, i want to sent back those material to vendor and against that give credit to vendor.
    i have no PO for those material.
    so, any procedure is available by which i can tranfer material back to vendor and amount for that transfered from my inventory account to vendor??

    Hi Luke,
    Thanks for your reply,
    I already checked in this Navigation for(ZC) Customer claims and (YV) Vendor Claims.
    But i have not seen any changes for these two Notification types.
    Its displaying the same Catalog profile for both Notifications.
    Can you please guide me any other way to check this requirmeent.
    Brgds,
    RK

  • Segregate third party vendor and inter-co vendor POs

    Hello,
    We have a situation where the business would like to prevent Supply chain buyers (inter/intra company POs), from creating POs against third party vendors.
    1) We have explored the option to create new POrg (for ICO only) and move all ICO vendors to the this new POrg. Then this POrg would be setup in the supply chain users' security profile so they cannot create POs against third party POrg. But this requires a significant amount of effort and alot of master data/ sources of supply updates.
    2) The second option is to create different document types for inter and intra company POs. Then the doc type would be assigned in the security profile to prevent supply chain from creating third party POs (currently, doc type UB is used for intra-co POs however, doc type "NB" is used for both 3rd party as well as Inter-company POs).
    3) Another one we thought of is to create each buyer as a Purchasing Group and set that in their secuity profile. This option also works good as we want to implement a PO Release Strategy.
    However, we are still stuck on how to check that the vendor used on the PO is an ICO vendor and not a third party (for both options 2 and 3). Does anyone have an insight on how we can ensure that the vendors on an inter/intra company PO is infact an ICO vendor? We want to make sure that our supply chain folks do not create POs for third party vendors.
    Thanks,
    Batul.

    Hi,
       If you are going for option 3, you may create the release strategy with the field CEKKO - RESWK (EKKO - RESWK) (Supplying plant). This field will be filled with plant only in case of STO and you can trigger corresponding release strategy. If its third party vendors, the above field will be empty.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Use of Reliable Messaging between WebLogic and a different vendor

    Hello,
    We have developed an application that is running on the WebLogic App Server v8.1
    sp1.
    Recently we have received a request/query on providing reliable SOAP messaging
    from our application to 3rd party.
    I have read the documentation on Reliable messaging support and have noted that
    it is only supported between two WebLogic Application servers.
    My questions are, since we do not have control of the 3rd party's application,
    and it may not be based on a WebLogic App Server:
    1. Will this work?
    2. Does anyone have any idea of the type of issues that may be experienced?
    3. How close is the implementation to the WS Reliable Messaging specification?
    So, if the other party was based on an IBM or Microsoft implementation is this
    likely to work?
    It goes without saying that any work done would need to be very throughly tested
    and qualified.
    I have looked through the WebLogic Documentation on WebServices as well as searching
    this newgroup for other posts on this topic, hopefully I have not missed anything
    (If so, my apologies.)
    Thanks,
    Mike Shea.

    Bruce Stephens <[email protected]> wrote:
    Hi Michael,
    The short answer, at this time, OOTB, WS-RM interop with an unknown
    vendor would be doubtful. For a longer answer, David Orchard has a good
    review of the emerging web services specs [0]. You might consider ebXML
    messaging [1] as a more mature solution.
    Thank you Bruce. I will look at these docs.
    Mike S.
    Hope this helps,
    Bruce
    [0]
    http://dev2dev.bea.com/technologies/webservices/articles/ws_orchard.jsp
    [1]
    http://e-docs.bea.com/wli/docs70/ebxml/getstart.htm
    Michael Shea wrote:
    Hello,
    We have developed an application that is running on the WebLogic AppServer v8.1
    sp1.
    Recently we have received a request/query on providing reliable SOAPmessaging
    from our application to 3rd party.
    I have read the documentation on Reliable messaging support and havenoted that
    it is only supported between two WebLogic Application servers.
    My questions are, since we do not have control of the 3rd party's application,
    and it may not be based on a WebLogic App Server:
    1. Will this work?
    2. Does anyone have any idea of the type of issues that may be experienced?
    3. How close is the implementation to the WS Reliable Messaging specification?
    So, if the other party was based on an IBM or Microsoft implementationis this
    likely to work?
    It goes without saying that any work done would need to be very throughlytested
    and qualified.
    I have looked through the WebLogic Documentation on WebServices aswell as searching
    this newgroup for other posts on this topic, hopefully I have not missedanything
    (If so, my apologies.)
    Thanks,
    Mike Shea.

  • Difference between outbound delivery against vendor and GI to vendor

    Hi all
    I was going through one scnerio,in which the good were being return to the vendor by creating outbound delivery using VL10b,with reference to PO.
    what is the difference when we issue the goods by using MIRO instead of creating outbound delivery.
    As in both of the cases stock is getting less and it is being send to vendor .
    Thanks
    sid

    Same same here, please post it into the GTS Forum:
    SAP Global Trade Services (GTS)
    Best,
    Frank

  • Alternative Payee set up in vendor master record for payments....

    Hi all,
    I am facing the problem on alternative payee set up in vendor master record.
    I have done the following settings but its not working.
    1) Created alternative payee vendor (XYZ) and blocked for posting.
    2) Created main vendor (ABCD) and given alternative payee vendor name (XYZ) in alternative payee field payment transactions tab of(general data + company code data) main vendor.
    3) Created an invoice for main vendor (ABCD) using F-43.
    4) Trying to make payment to main vendor (ABCD) in f-53.  So when i simulate the document system supposed to show automatically the alternative payee vendor number . But itu2019s not showing and still making payment to main vendor not alternative payee.
    Please help me to solve this issue. Is there any other settings need to be done to achieve this scenario (alternative payee).
    Thank you very much.

    Hello,
    thank you for your quick reply.
    1) i taken out the payment block for alternative vendor (XYZ) and tried again the above 3rd and 4th steps but still not working system paying to main verdor (ABCD) instead alternative payee(XYZ).
    2) i blocked for payment posting the main vendor(ABCD) and tested same still not working.
    need helps to resolve this.
    thanq.

  • Open vendors items paid to unique alternative payee in one check

    I have the following open items for a vendor to be paid by the payment
    program, each vendor has the same alternative payee, and we need just one check is printing to the alternative payee:
    Vendor | Item |Amount   |Payment Method  | Alternative payee|
    1001   |  1     | $100      | C -  heck             |   5000               |
    1500   |  2     | $200      | C -  check           |   5000               |
    2600   |  3     | $300      | C -  check           |   5000               |
    When the payment program is executed, we need each invoice of the each vendor must be paid to the unique alternative payee in one check.
    Are there any other options available to enable these open items to be grouped together as one payment and printing in one check?
    Right now, when the payment program is executed, each invoice of each vendor is paid as a separate item, in this case, three checks are created to the same alternative payee, we want just one check to the alternative payee is printing,
    Thank you, for your help with this situation.

    Experts,
    any pointers please ..
    Thanks,
    Best regards,
    Prashant

  • J1i2 report error ? if the vendor is attached with alternative payee

    Dear MM experts,
    I  am having an  issue with regard to J1i2 report. I have raised PO with JVCS tax condition on vendor (this vendor master has been attached with alterntive payee) .
    J1I2 report is not able get the data  of POs/MIROs detaile for such vendors (alternative payee attached). J1I2 is considering and pulling report for only Vendors (who are not having alternative payee code in vendor master data)
    Can i get help from experts, how I can get details of Vendors (attached with alternative payee vendor code).
    Thanks in advance,
    Thanks & regards
    Srihari
    Edited by: Ediga Srihari on Dec 24, 2009 11:37 AM

    problem/issued solved by sap service market place by suggesting us to go for Zreport.
    thanx
    Srihari

  • Clearing between customer and vendor invoice with F110 transaction

    Hello,
    I have an issue related to the functionalities of the transaction F110.
    I'd like to clear the vendor invoice with the custome invoice.
    Customer and vendor records are linked properly and the flag 'Clrg with Cust.' is set on vendor and 'Clearing with Vendor' is set on customer.
    Both the invoice are in USD and the amount in document currency of the vendor invoice is > of the amount in document currency of the customer invoice.
    I entered in both the invoice the same payment method (outgoing payment method).
    The error that I can see in the proposal log is related to the customer invoice and is:
    Payment method selection for items due now to the amount of USD          500,00
    Due items with currency USD, pmnt method  - items total is > 0
    ..none of the payment methods defined can be used for these items
    information re. vendor xxxxxxxx / customer yyyyyyy / paying company code TS01 ...
    .. payment not possible because of reported error
    According to the log of the proposal the vendor invoice can be paid.
    If I click on display proposal and double click on the customer invoice (with red light) I can read the note:
    No pymt possible because items with a debit
    Following the settings of the payment method used:
    Payment method in the country
    - Payment method for outgoing payment selected
    - Bank transf. selected
    - allowed for personal payment flagged
    - Bank details flagged
    - Document type for payment XX
    - clearing document type XX
    - Use classic payment medium program selected
    Currency allowed: This table is empty (will mean that all currencies are permitted)
    Payment method in company code
    Minimum amount: 0,01
    Maximum amount: 9.999.999.999,99
    Distribution amnt: 0,00
    Single paymentfor marked item selected
    Foreign business partner allowed selected
    foreign currency allowed selected
    Cust/vend bank abroad allowed? selected
    Bank selection control "No optimization" selected
    Can you please help me to understand the error?
    I'm afraid it is a problem with the bank but I don't understand why the payment of the vendor invoice is allowed and the customer invoice not.
    Thank you very much in advance
    Kind R

    Hello,
    I have an issue related to the functionalities of the transaction F110.
    I'd like to clear the vendor invoice with the custome invoice.
    Customer and vendor records are linked properly and the flag 'Clrg with Cust.' is set on vendor and 'Clearing with Vendor' is set on customer.
    Both the invoice are in USD and the amount in document currency of the vendor invoice is > of the amount in document currency of the customer invoice.
    I entered in both the invoices the same payment method (outgoing payment method).
    The error that I can see in the proposal log is related to the customer invoice and is:
    Payment method selection for items due now to the amount of USD          500,00
    Due items with currency USD, pmnt method  - items total is > 0
    ..none of the payment methods defined can be used for these items
    information re. vendor xxxxxxxx / customer yyyyyyy / paying company code TS01 ...
    .. payment not possible because of reported error
    According to the log of the proposal the vendor invoice can be paid.
    If I click on display proposal and double click on the customer invoice (with red light) I can read the note:
    No pymt possible because items with a debit bal.still exist; see job log
    Following the settings of the payment method used:
    Payment method in the country
    - Payment method for outgoing payment selected
    - Bank transf. selected
    - allowed for personal payment flagged
    - Bank details flagged
    - Document type for payment XX
    - clearing document type XX
    - Use classic payment medium program selected
    Currency allowed: This table is empty (will mean that all currencies are permitted)
    Payment method in company codeMinimum amount: 0,01
    Maximum amount: 9.999.999.999,99
    Distribution amnt: 0,00
    Single paymentfor marked item selected
    Foreign business partner allowed selected
    foreign currency allowed selected
    Cust/vend bank abroad allowed? selected
    Bank selection control "No optimization" selected
    Can you please help me to understand the error?
    I'm afraid it is a problem with the bank but I don't understand why the payment of the vendor invoice is allowed and the customer invoice not.
    Thank you very much in advance
    Kind Regards
    Emanuela

  • Check printing to handle payment to alternative payee

    Hi,
    Requirement
    For our customer, alternative payee is not currently configured.
    Finance manually nets the amount between two vendor and then process check payment.
    Hence we have a requirement to automatically print a single check for payee and alternative payee together in and net the amount of all invoices.
    Currently when we do check printing (copy of SAP program RFFOUS_C), if we have a vendor A and vendor B (whose alternative payee is vendor A), then we get two different checks with Vendor name as Vendor A.
    Business requirement is to get single check for Vendor A consolidating the remittance information of both vendors (Vendor A and Vendor B).
    We also want this to be reflected properly in check register and check number assigned to both the payment documents.
    Technical Changes
    The change requires only one check number against 2 Account Numbers of Vendor/Creditor.
    In the subroutine scheckinfo_speichern in Program RFFOUS_C, there is a logic to insert a new record in PAYR table against a check number.
    Check Number (PAYR-CHECT) is a primary field in the table. Our requirement is to have 2 PAYR-LIFNR entries against the same Check Number(PAYR-CHECT).
    But given the structure of the table with Check Number(CHECT) as primary key field, this cant be achieved.
    Is there any other alternative for the same.
    Thanks,
    Best regards,
    Prashant

    Experts,
    any pointers please ..
    Thanks,
    Best regards,
    Prashant

  • Invoice load using main vendor and alternate payeeu0085Issues ????

    Hello all,
    I have a question regarding alternate payee in the vendor master.  We have a vendor A which has an alternate payee in it B .
    So when we load an invoice with vendor A and run payment run it picks up vendor B as recipient.
    But when we load an invoice with vendor B, it doesn’t pull anything in payment run.
    Although vendor B (alternate payee ) is linked to vendor A. Can we do any configuration so that if we load an invoice against alternate payee , he will get picked up in payment run.
    I was also curious… does anyone know when we have vendor and alternate payee how does accounting entries differ than having normal vendor.
    Points will be awarded...
    Thanks for your help.
    Roma.

    OK
    There are two things to consider here.
    1, you post an invoice to a Vendor, that is the accounting document. If you post it to vendor "A" it will post to Vendor "A". However if Vendor "A" has a different payee, when you go to pay that Vendor's invoice, the invoice will clear from Vendor "A" but the payment will be made to the bank details of vendor "B".
    If you dont set up vendor "A" as a normal Vendor then it wont be able to post an invoice to it, and therefore you wont be able to pay it.
    hope this make sense.

  • Vendor and plant assigment

    Hi all
    I need your help on this issue.
    Is there a restriction in system that only one vendor account can be assigned to a given plant?
    vendor 10035120  need to be assigned to plant 4203, however when I trying to create the assignment the following  error message appears:
    Plant 4203 already assigned to vendor 10011229
    Message no. WY 060
    I can not see any relation between vendor 10035120 and 10011229
    vendor account group  Z001 (this is a copy of the SAP default 0001.
    any idea?
    Thanks and regards

    why should one plant be 2 vendors?
    you need to assign a vendor to a Plant if you want do Stock transfers with PO and deliveries.
    per plant you define one vendor, and this one vendor is then assgined to the plant (in vendor master purchasing view via menu  Extras)
    plant A is vendor A
    plant B is vendor B
    If A procures from B, then plant B is entered in the purchase order header, while the purchase order item has your plant A.
    the relationships (Which plant procures from which other plant) are setup in cutomizing.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Vendor Balane is not tally with the Reconcilation Account

    Hi to all.. When i am checking vendor reconcialtion account T,code S_alr_87012082 For eg my reconcilation account  no is 100000, and ia m checking in Fs10n Gl balance its not matching some differance is there. But it should match .. pls guide me

  • Lost work on pages when computer crashed...any way to retrieve data

    My granddaughter had spent three days on a written report on PAGES. She was doing other things on the computer, probably listening to music, which made her computer crash. When the computer was restarted we could not find her report. I need help! She

  • Naming of Business objects

    Also I would like to know how we name different objects in BI.

  • When deploying a single server on new hardware, do you virtualize it or not?

    There are a few questions that I've found on ServerFault that hint around this topic, and while it may be somewhat opinion-based, I think it can fall into that "good subjective" category based on the below: Constructive subjective questions: * tend t

  • BT Exchange to Home Speed = 0mb

    Hi all, Just got BT Infinity installed 30 mins ago, the internet works, but did a speedtest through BT and this is what i see http://i40.tinypic.com/1pfhir.png Is the speed from the exchange to my home meant to read 0mb? cheers for any replies Solved