Payment term thread continuation with that

Thank you all.for your reply to previous thread of mine.
So in relation to above my requirement is that Cash discount is based on payment term and differs from material to material.
Suppose i maintain a cash discount of 1% for material x and the payment term is payment in 7 days then this 1% should be active on the receipt of payment from the customer within 7 days only otherwise the cash discount does not apply.
Please guide .as no percentage is maintained in payment term because it will be applicable for all the material for that particular customer.

Suppose you have payment term
0003 :
Within 14 days 3 % cash discount
Within 20 days 2 % cash discount
Within 30 days Due net
If you use the condition type SKTO, the payment terms will be activated in the billing document and when the customer makes a payment if the payment date is within 14 days 3% gets activated automatically, within 20 days then 2% and from 20-30 days no cash discount.
Regards
AK
Hope I was able to explain properly

Similar Messages

Payment terms in OBB8 with 50 days with two day of payment.

Hi Experts,
We need some helpu2026. We have to create a payment terms in OBB8 with 50 days with two day of payment, day 05 and 20.
Requisites:
If the bill expire date is between the days 01 and 15 from month X, the pay is realized the day 05 from month X.
If the bill expire date is between the days 16 and 31 from month X, the pay is realized the day 20 from month X.
Any idea
Best Regards,
Driss,

Hello Driss
In the payment terms , where you define cash discounts .
You can configure the requirement you specified .
Maintain as follows :
Term ,    Percentage     ,        No.of days      ,     Fixed date   ,   Additional month
1         ,       0.00%            ,        15              ,            05           ,           0
2         ,       0.00%            ,       31                 ,         20             ,         0
I think this should work fine
Let me know if this is ok
Ravindra Kumar

My order have a status: "Payment action required: We are unable to obtain an authorization for the credit card you provided. Please contact your card issuing bank. Please update your payment method to continue with this order". But i paid from AmEx.

My order have a status: "Payment action required: We are unable to obtain an authorization for the credit card you provided. Please contact your card issuing bank. Please update your payment method to continue with this order". But i paid from AmEx. And my money blocked when i see it in internet banking.

Have yuo contacted AmEx? From what you describe it seems like AmEx is blocking the charge.
You can contact iTunes if you want by:
Contact iTunes

MM INVOICE created with different Payment Terms and 2 differents PO.

I will explain with an example to understand better the issue and why this could happen, (for the same Co.Code):
On 05.09.2011, 5203795529 was posted with payment terms D030.
At that time, PO #: 4501105395 was having payment terms D030 while PO #: 4501232207 was having payment term D031.
Invoice 5203795529 was posted successfully.
On 12.09.2011, 5203806574 was posted with payment terms D030.
At that time, PO #: 4501105395 was having payment terms D030 while PO #: 4501232207 was having payment term D031.
Invoice 5203795529 was posted successfully.
In OCT, user receives another invoice for this 2 POs (4501232207 & 4501105395) and trying to post MIRO again but this time, user encountered error 'Payment terms in purchase order 4501232207 differ from current terms'. In order to proceed, user has changed payment term for 4501105395 from D030 to D031 on 17.10.2011 and proceed with invoice posting without error. 5203878342 was posted on 17.10.2011.
The vendor always has the same Payment Term: D031
Now the question is, why user is able to post without any problem previously even though there's different payment terms on both POs and not now anymore?.
Thanks

Thanks Jayavar,
Nobody has changed anything, (I mean the PO Payment terms), until October in PO. 4501105395
The error message is when the user try to post with MIRO PO´s (4501232207 & 4501105395):
"Terms of payment in purchase order 4501232207 (always with Payment term D031), differ from current terms"
Message no. M8349
Diagnosis:
The terms of payment in the current invoice differ from those in the current purchase order 4501232207, other terms of payment were stipulated:
Terms of payment key D031
1st cash discount period 31 days 0,000%
Either you have selected more purchase orders with different terms of payment, or you have changed the terms of payment manually.
But the strange thing is in SEP, there's already this difference & there is no problem posting the invoice & the problem only comes when in OCT.
Thanks and Rgs
Francisco

Different Payment Terms in vendor invoice, (with differ. PO)

I will explain with an example to understand better the issue and why this could happen, (for the same Co.Code):
On 05.09.2011, 5203795529 was posted with payment terms D030.
At that time, PO #: 4501105395 was having payment terms D030 while PO #: 4501232207 was having payment term D031.
Invoice 5203795529 was posted successfully.
On 12.09.2011, 5203806574 was posted with payment terms D030.
At that time, PO #: 4501105395 was having payment terms D030 while PO #: 4501232207 was having payment term D031.
Invoice 5203795529 was posted successfully.
In OCT, user receives another invoice for this 2 POs (4501232207 & 4501105395) and trying to post MIRO again but this time, user encountered error 'Payment terms in purchase order 4501232207 differ from current terms'. In order to proceed, user has changed payment term for 4501105395 from D030 to D031 on 17.10.2011 and proceed with invoice posting without error. 5203878342 was posted on 17.10.2011.
The vendor always has the same Payment Term: D031
Now the question is, why user is able to post without any problem previously even though there's different payment terms on both POs and not now anymore?.
The strange thing is in SEP, there's already this difference & there is no problem posting the invoice & the problem only comes when in OCT.
Why does this happen?
Thanks and Regards

Hi Vena,
Originally the error message was:
"Terms of payment in purchase order 4501232207 (always with Payment term D031), differ from current terms"
Message no. M8349
Diagnosis:
The terms of payment in the current invoice differ from those in the current purchase order 4501232207, other terms of payment were stipulated:
Terms of payment key D031
1st cash discount period 31 days 0,000%
Either you have selected more purchase orders with different terms of payment, or you have changed the terms of payment manually.
But the strange thing is in SEP, there's already this difference & there is no problem posting the invoice & the problem only comes when in OCT.
Thanks and Rgs
Francisco

Need to default payment terms with 'A000' in VA02 transaction.

Hi gurus,
In my requirement i need to default payment terms (VBKD-ZTERM) with 'A000' when the order types(VBAK-AUART) are 'ZBRE' and 'ZBC2' in VA02 transaction .
I found the user exit which is getting trigerred - ' exit_sapmv45a_004'.
But in that exit the tables which we are importing having neither payment terms nor order type.
So,can you please help me out .
Thanking you in advance.

hi,
My requirement has been changed from va02 transaction to va01 .
Now, i need to default payment terms (VBKD-ZTERM) with 'A000' when the order types(VBAK-AUART) are 'ZBRE' and 'ZBC2' in VA01 transaction .
can anyone suggest how can we solve this..
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Bhanu

Multiple payment term with different day limit

We have three payment terms with multiple day limit. for example: ED11 (day limit 10), ED11 (25 day limit) and ED11 (32 days).
User enter just ED11 but i dont understand how system understand which out of the three is the require payment term.
Users feel that due date calculated is wrong. In most case it calculate the due date exactly based on the days mentioned in the payment term. In all cases, days mentioned are 90 days.
In one case, due date if it is (just 90 days) 30/04 but user feels it should be 10th May in the following (obviously he is reffering to ED11 daylimit 10). In this case, SAP calculate 90 days. Is it because of too many payment terms which same name.
Best,
Bala

Hi,
Please go and check the following path.If teh user wants no. of days as 10, then it should be maintained as 10 in the no. of days field in Payment terms. I think in your case it may be maintained as 90.
IMG->Finacial Accounting->General Ledger Accounting->Accounts Receivable and accounts Payable->Business Transactions->Outgoing Invoices/Credit memos->Maintain Terms of Payment->Check No. of days in Payment terms.
Assign points if u consider this to be useful.
Thanks,
Prithwiraj

Payment Terms at Different Levels

Hi All,
To my understanding, at present, the process of populating the payment terms is as follows:
1. Payment terms are defined at Supplier/Supplier Site level.
2. Contract PO is created and during the creation, it takes the default payment terms at Supplier / Supplier Site level based on the priority.
3. Now, all the standard purchase orders that get created take the payment terms defined at Contract PO if we reference this Contract PO.
Now my question is
What if the payment terms at Supplier/ Supplier site level gets changed???
The same will not get applied to Contract PO and the new Standard POs continue to take up the payment terms defined at Contract POs.
This scenario is creating the confusion to me.
Can anyone explain the scenario and let me know the way to get Contract PO payment terms get sync with corresponding Supplier/ Supplier site leve payment terms.

Hi:
Supplier and supplier site values are used to get defaulted to various document level (PO, Invoices, Payments etc) and changing at document/transactional level does not change the values at Master level. So in your case, you need to change the payment term at contract PO level and supplier/site level separately.

Re : Payment Terms 40 days due on 10 th month

Needs Payment Term Configuration :
Payment Terms 40 days due on 10 th month
Regards
Chandu

Hi,
I presume that your requirement is 40 days due and payable on the 10th of next month.
Here is my suggestion with an illustration.
You can create a payment term, say xxxx, with -
day limit = 2
payment terms / fixed date = 10
payment terms/ additional months = 1
and another payment term, with the same name xxxx, with
day limit = 31
payment terms / fixed date = 10
payment terms/ additional months = 2
This will work as follows -
An invoice dated 1st March, will get paid on April 10th, due date having fallen on April 9th
An invvoice dated 2nd March will get paid on April 10th, due date having fallen on April 10th
An invvoice dated 3rd March will get paid on May 10th, as it will be only 39 days due on April 10th
An invoice dated 1st April, will get paid on May 10th, due date having fallen on May 10th
An invvoice dated 2nd April will get paid on June 10th, as it will be only 39 days due on May10th
An invvoice dated 1st Feb will get paid on April 10th, as it will be only 38 or 39 days due on March10th
As majority of the months have 31 days, I came to a logical conclusion that the day limit can ideally be 2. However, you can decide a date that best suits your requirement.
Regards,
Mike

Payment Term/BP on the level of Charge type in FWO

According to business process I have 2 variants of payment term for transportation with payer:
1)      Prepaid (paid by Agency1(Payer1) in POL port of Loading)
2)      Collect (paid by Agency2(Payer2) in POD port of discharge)
3)      Today customer has a requirement to issue several settlements from one FWO to different business partners on the level of charge type.
Example:
BP Role: Payer
BP : Payer 1
Payment term: will pay with term prepaid:
Charge type1 - NTFR (Net Ocean Freight)
Charge type2 - BAF (Bunker Adjustment Factor)
BP Role: Payer
BP : Payer 2
Payment term: will pay with term collect:
Charge type3 - DTHC
The problem is how to combine several terms(prepaid/collect/direct) with several BP Roles(Payer)/BP(Payer1/Payer2)on the level of charge type(service) in FWO.
From the fisrt sight this case could be some way covered by standard on 9.1 functionality of «Charge type activation based on incoterm».
But at the same time we some issues with this standard solution, because we need to split payer and term not only for the whole stage, but also for different charges in one stage. An example of this could be port to port transportation without any pre-carriage or on-carriage, but with OTHC/DTHC that could be paid in any term(P/C) separately by the appropriate agent in POL or POD. At the same time all the transportation costs will be associated only with one stage of transportation.
Do anybody has an idea how to split payment term deeper than level of stage?

Hi,
You can use the "Flexible Settlement" function in TM9.1.
Assign the charge types to settlement group.
Assign the settlement group to settlement rule.
Assign the settlement rule to settlement profile.
Best Regards
Clark Huang

Credit memo payment term

hi,
in customer master, what is credit memo payment term?
what is the difference between credit memo payment term and terms of payment.
i read from F1 but still can't get it.
thanks
rgds

HI
In customer master we define a payment terms as well as Credit memo payment terms.
Like suppose we have for Customer with Payment term = Net 30 days (Z001)
And for the same customer we have defined Credit memo terms = Pay Immediately (Z005).
When we post an Invoice for this customer it will have Payment terms as Z001 i.e. net 30.
Whereas when we post a credit memo for the above invoice it will inherit the new payment terms from Customer master that is, Z005 i.e. due Immediately.
Credit memo payment terms can be same as payment term or different depending on the business requirement.

Vendor changes tracking, Payment term filtering, Vendor listing

Hi All,
Need somebody help on the following points,
1- While changing the vendor via "process vendor and Bidder" (Business partner maintenance) transaction in EBP, the selection of payment term is restricted. That is in SPRO I can see lot of payment terms, but while changing the vendor some few payment terms are coming. Where is the filter? Can anybody guide me.
2- Vendor changes Tracking. In our project somebody has changed frequently the vendor indicators and details in EBP via process Vendor and Bidder(BP maintenance) transaction. But I couldnt able to track which fields are changed and by whom like in R/3. I tried in BP also, but only the address changed details are coming there. Can anybody guide me how to track the changes, if somebody changed somefield in EBP directly?
3- Vendor list - I want list ERS activated vendor in EBP. How to get the list of vendor for which ERS indicator is active? Please guide me.
Many thanks in Advance.
Regards
Shunmugaraj. T

Hi
Please refer to standard transaction - BBP_PD.. give any Shopping cart number, which is approved by a list of buyers, managers, etc..
Incase the changes are made, it will display all the details related to them in that case.
Understand its logic by putting break-point inside.
Incase you are using SRM 5.5 version, there is a report, which displays the changes made to the Purchase orders with old and new values.
Report name -> TERM_DISPLAY_CHANGE_HISTORY
Also please refer this as well.
Say you use this Function module for the change object - BUPA_BBP0060
This sample code will all the changes, if any, made to the object, with the old value and new values.
Here is the sample code for the FM ->
CHANGEDOCUMENTS_TO_OBJECT 
data: listtitle(80) type c.
data: objectclass like cdhdr-objectclas.
data: objecttitle(20) type c.
data: con_keylength(2) type n value 10.
data: cursor_field(20) type c.
listtitle = 'Changes made'.
listtitle+22 = vibebe-sberi.
listtitle+34 = vibebe-xberibz.
condense listtitle.
objectclass = 'BUPA_BBP0060'.
call function 'CHANGEDOCUMENTS_TO_OBJECT'
 exporting
 callmodus = callmodus
 cursor_field = cursor_field
 keylength = con_keylength
 listtitle = listtitle
 objectclass = objectclass
 objectid = objectid
 objecttitle = objecttitle
 exceptions
 error_in_function = 01
 invalid_field = 02
 others = 03.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
 message id sy-msgid type 'S' number sy-msgno
 with sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
endif.
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points.
Regards
- Atul

Default Payment terms from Vendor Master not from Reference PO

Hello guys,
I am creating a PO in reference to another PO and payment terms are copied from the old PO but not updating from Vendor Master. Our payment terms are changed very frequent and our users don't want to create a new PO with too many line items so they just copy an old PO.
IS there a way to update payment terms form Vendor Master after copying an Old PO? I know this is pretty standard functionality but just trying to see if we can trick the system,
Thanks
Ronnie.

If so then convert this into an error message ensuring that the correct payment term to appear in the message, that the users need not search themselves and find out for updating the payment term
One thing is that there is no configuration available for you take care of this automatically, there has to be user exit solution.

Unable to change payment terms for BP

Forum,
I have a system where on the business partner master if we change the payment terms for a business partner the price list is also changing which we do not want it too. Is there a way to stop this from happening?
An example is:- The business partner's payment terms = 30 days with a price list called 'Distributor'
After changing the payment terms it changed the price list 'End User'
And if we change the payment terms back to 30 days it changed the price list again but to another called 'GN Purchase Price GBP'
I look forward to receiving your advise.
Regards,
Juan

Noticed afterwards that there is a Price List option within the payment terms screen. This is what's causing them to change.

Payment Terms not getting updated for local Purch Org Vendor Combination

Hi
I have updated the vendor master with new payment term in EBP. The same got updated for Back End Pucrh Org. But it is not getting updated for local Purch Org. I am using extended classic scenario and have BE and local Purch Org.
I anybody can tell me the solution on how to update payment terms for Vendor with local Purch Org. Thanks
Regards
Vinod Raorane

Hi
Which SRM version are you using ?
How you replicated the Vendor master in EBP ? Which transactions or programs you used ?
Have you used BBPGETVD Transaction or any other program ?
And also checked the log of SLG1 transaction. ?
Can you see the updated details in BBPMAINTINT Transaction for that vendor
Any other logs you noticed in SLG1 or ST22 Transaction ?
Please refer to following links.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/18/db183d30805c59e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/43/1f8c03b8c606f4e10000000a422035/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/d3/4b9c3b122efc6ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/56/54f137a5e6740ae10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/81/e08194b6e4734f8dde536e8b8ac4a0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/92/fd7d3cb7f58910e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
Regards
- Atul

Payment term thread continuation with that

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for