Payment Terms at Different Levels

Hi All,
To my understanding, at present, the process of populating the payment terms is as follows:
1. Payment terms are defined at Supplier/Supplier Site level.
2. Contract PO is created and during the creation, it takes the default payment terms at Supplier / Supplier Site level based on the priority.
3. Now, all the standard purchase orders that get created take the payment terms defined at Contract PO if we reference this Contract PO.
Now my question is
What if the payment terms at Supplier/ Supplier site level gets changed???
The same will not get applied to Contract PO and the new Standard POs continue to take up the payment terms defined at Contract POs.
This scenario is creating the confusion to me.
Can anyone explain the scenario and let me know the way to get Contract PO payment terms get sync with corresponding Supplier/ Supplier site leve payment terms.

Hi:
Supplier and supplier site values are used to get defaulted to various document level (PO, Invoices, Payments etc) and changing at document/transactional level does not change the values at Master level. So in your case, you need to change the payment term at contract PO level and supplier/site level separately.

Similar Messages

  • Payment terms for different products from a single vendor

    Hi Pundits,
    Our client has a requirement to assign different payment terms for different products. Each product he buys from his vendor has it's own payment terms. He wants us to customize in such a way that when he/user enters the invoice, not only the vendor number is shown along with the product name but also the payment terms for that particular product are calculated.
    I know that only one payment term can be assigned in the vendor master data. Is there anyway to get around this?
    Creating the same vendor multiple times and assign payment terms looks a possible option but that looks quite hectic cause he has close to 1000 payment terms.

    Taurian, thank you for that suggestion!
    I can maintain as many existing payment terms as the client has with his vendors and let him choose the payment terms at the time of invoice entry.
    The only problem is that he might have to change it according to the current market rates for that product. So maintaining any payment term is of little use.
    Edited by: Dummy_Variable on Aug 16, 2011 8:26 AM

  • Payment Terms at Item Level

    Hi All,
    1.After SO Creation, When I change payment terms at Header level, Payment terms at Item level are not changing.
    2. We are using same payment terms at both Header and Item Level.(Payment terms are not getting determined from Condition Record. PT are determining from Customer master)
    3. We can change payment terms at Item manually, But the SO are in bulk.
    Anybody came across such situation.
    Thank$
    Hidayath

    Thanks Jignesh and Siva,
    The payment terms are not automatically updating only in particular sales document for Ex: SO and for Other contracts It's working as expected.
    --> I checked in VOV7 for all the Item categories. config is Ok.
    Any pointers on this issue?
    Thank$
    Hidayath

  • Payment terms at header level

    Dear All,
    Please let me know what will be the terms of payment at header level, if I have 2 line items and these 2 line items have different payments terms.
    Thank You.
    Regards
    Madhu

    Hi!
    Payment terms are copied from customer master. So the standard SAP way would be to determine the Payment terms from customer master and copy it in the header. And when you add a line, the Payment terms get copied from header to item level. But while doing pricing or through user exits pyament terms could be changed.
    But the header level will remain same as in the customer master, untill explicilty changed. There is no flow of payment terms from item to header.
    But at the time of billing the delivery will split into two invoices because of different payment terms.
    Hope this solves your problem.
    ABhishek

  • User exit for Payment terms at header level

    Dear Alli
    In which user exit, I have to modify if I need ti change value of payment terms at Sales Order Header level .
    and  let me know in which include program is that ??
    Thank You.
    Regards
    Madhu
    Edited by: madhu tatikonda on Feb 12, 2008 8:58 PM

    You can check move_field_to_vbak or in USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE
    in include: MV45AFZZ

  • Payment terms in different languages

    Hi, how can I do to see a payment terms in more than one language? I will created it in spanish, but I need to see it in different languages.
    Thanks,
    Cecilia
    Moderator: Please, search before posting

    Hi,
    The solution referred to above (OBB8, choose languages, translate) updates the 'Own explanation' of the paymen term', in table T052U. And probably that covers your requirement completely.
    However, the 'Sales text' of the payment terms is in table TVZBT, and cannot be translated in the above way.
    I had a requirement to have the 'Sales  text' of the payment term also in different languages.
    Rather than logging on in each separate language and maintain the 'Sales text' in OBB8, we updated table TVZBT directly with SE16N, and transported the entries through the landscape.
    Not quite the standard way, but it works just fine.
    Regards,
    Rob

  • How to default payment term from Site level

    Hi All,
    When creating an Order, the payment terms are defaulting from the defined defaulting rules.
    As per the defaulting rules, it is supposed to pick as following seq..
    1 Related Record - Invoice To.Payment term
    2 Related Record - Ship To.Payment term
    3 Related Record - Customer.Payment term
    4 Constant Value - TBD
    Now, as per the rule, it is picking the Payment term from Invoice to level. If there is none defined then it is picking from the Customer level as we never define at Ship To level.
    Now my question, is there any way we can implement to pick the Payment term from the Site level when Invoice To payment term is not defined.
    Please let me know if any additional info is required.
    Thanks.
    Edited by: R on Oct 18, 2012 10:06 AM

    R wrote:
    Hi All,
    When creating an Order, the payment terms are defaulting from the defined defaulting rules.
    As per the defaulting rules, it is supposed to pick as following seq..
    1 Related Record - Invoice To.Payment term
    2 Related Record - Ship To.Payment term
    3 Related Record - Customer.Payment term
    4 Constant Value - TBD
    Now, as per the rule, it is picking the Payment term from Invoice to level. If there is none defined then it is picking from the Customer level as we never define at Ship To level.
    Now my question, is there any way we can implement to pick the Payment term from the Site level when Invoice To payment term is not defined.
    Please let me know if any additional info is required.
    Thanks.
    Edited by: R on Oct 18, 2012 10:06 AMDo you mind modifying the defaulting rule to have site level in between Invoice To.Payment term and Ship To.Payment term. Were you not able to change?
    Thanks
    Pradeep

  • Regarding BP tcode and MK03 for updating payment terms for different vendor

    My requirement was to update the payment terms in to MK03.
    Our business useseres will give the payment terms for FI Vendores in BP tcode and save payment terms for FI Vendores in BP TCODE and this payment terms shoule updated ditrectly in to MK03 for every FI Vendor .
    How we will update the payment frome BP to MK03 directly. In BP the technical name for payment terms was LFB1-ZTERM and in MK03 the technical name was LFM1-ZTERM .
    I want to update payment for single company code only. In mk01, we creating vendors for purchase org level how we will update payment to mk01 from BP TCODE pls give how i have to update this payment terms from BP to MK01.

    My requirement  was to update the payment terms in to MK03.
    Our business useseres will give the payment terms for FI Vendores in BP tcode and save payment terms for FI Vendores in BP TCODE  and this payment terms shoule updated ditrectly in to MK03 for every FI Vendor .
    How we will update the payment frome BP to MK03 directly. In BP  the technical name for payment terms was LFB1-ZTERM and in MK03 the technical name was LFM1-ZTERM .
    I want to update payment for single company code only.  In mk01, we  creating vendors for purchase org level how we will update payment to mk01 from BP TCODE pls give how i have to update this payment terms from BP to MK01.

  • Payment term at site level in AR Customer interface

    Is there anyway to assign *‘Payment Terms’* to Customer at Site level using interface table.
    Navigation : Customer>Address> business purpose > bill_to>Details > ‘Payment terms’
    Please help.
    Regards
    Suresh

    Kindly find the (Bug 245300 : NEED CUST INTERFACE TO UPLOAD IMPORTANT FIELDS E.G. SIC CODE, SALES CHANNEL CODE) bug on metalink.

  • Payment terms in different langauage

    Dear Gurus
    I  have created a new payment term in English, it needs to be extended in other languages and then transported to other clients.
    I can update the tables entries in transport  request itself, but not sure which table I need to pick.
    Regards,
    Neeraj Srivastava

    HI Neeraj,
    There is a simpler way..
    Just got to transaction OBB8 and there is an aoption for transalation.
    Enter tour description there and the you can transport to other clients in the language you have mentioned in translation.
    Thanks in advance
    Krish

  • Payment Terms conditions differing

    Hi,
    I am using a Payment term for several vendors which originally has payment due date condition as :"Within 30 days Due net". But when i posted an invoice, the invoice got blocked with Payment block "R".  When i released the Payment block R, the payment due date condition automatically changed from 30 days to 54 days. i could see the same through Document changes via t code fb04.
    I then had to manually change it to the correct days/percent. The payment due date got corrected to 30 days after that But my question is why such thing happened? Days/Percent was originally in 30 days when it was header but when WF-Batch post the document is has been changed to 54 days.
    Regards,
    Priyank

    Hi Pryianka and Wojtek,
    I too had this issue with the WF-BATCH userID making changes to the Payment due date on release.
    It was identified to be an issue with the workflow.
    I would recommend that you have a look at the workflow step that releases the invoice.
    It will most likely call the following function module:  'BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_RELEASE'
    This function module has an input parameter called: "discount_shift", if an 'X' is passed it will introduce offset days based on the baseline due date and the release date.
    This calculation is done via function module: MRM_OFFSET_BASELINE_DATE
    All I did was just replace the input parameter with a space (' ') instead of an 'X' and this resolved the problem.
    Thanks, Bruno

  • Multiple payment term with different day limit

    We have three payment terms with multiple day limit. for example: ED11 (day limit 10),  ED11 (25 day limit) and ED11 (32 days).
    User enter just ED11 but i dont understand how system understand which out of the three is the require payment term.
    Users feel that due date calculated is wrong. In most case it calculate the due date exactly based on the days mentioned in the payment term. In all cases, days mentioned are 90 days.
    In one case, due date if it is (just 90 days) 30/04 but user feels it should be 10th May in the following (obviously he is reffering to ED11 daylimit 10). In this case, SAP calculate 90 days. Is it because of too many payment terms which same name.
    Best,
    Bala

    Hi,
    Please go and check the following path.If teh user wants no. of days as 10, then it should be maintained as 10 in the no. of days field in Payment terms. I think in your case it may be maintained as 90.
    IMG->Finacial Accounting->General Ledger Accounting->Accounts Receivable and accounts Payable->Business Transactions->Outgoing Invoices/Credit memos->Maintain Terms of Payment->Check No. of days in Payment terms.
    Assign points if u consider this to be useful.
    Thanks,
    Prithwiraj

  • Payment terms  at item level in Po Or IR

    Hi All,
    İs it possible to enter terms of payment at item level. There is an invoice with different terms of payment at item level how can ı post it?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    But TOP deals with Vendor, so its always at header leval only.
    Other wise create more POs with Diff.TOP .
    regards

  • Payment Term/BP on the level of Charge type in FWO

    According to business process I have 2 variants of payment term  for transportation with payer:
    1)      Prepaid (paid by Agency1(Payer1) in POL port of Loading)
    2)      Collect (paid by Agency2(Payer2) in POD port of discharge)
    3)      Today customer has  a requirement to issue several settlements from one FWO to different business partners on the level of  charge type.
    Example:
    BP Role: Payer
    BP : Payer 1
    Payment term: will pay with term prepaid:
    Charge type1 - NTFR (Net Ocean Freight)
    Charge type2 - BAF (Bunker Adjustment Factor)
    BP Role: Payer
    BP : Payer 2 
    Payment term: will pay with term collect:
    Charge type3 - DTHC
    The problem is how to  combine several terms(prepaid/collect/direct) with several BP Roles(Payer)/BP(Payer1/Payer2)on the level of charge type(service) in FWO.
    From the fisrt sight this case could be some way covered by standard on 9.1 functionality of «Charge type activation based on incoterm».
    But at the same time we some issues with this standard solution, because we need to split payer and term not only for the whole stage, but also for different charges in one stage. An example of this could be port to port transportation without any pre-carriage or on-carriage, but with OTHC/DTHC that could be paid in any term(P/C) separately by the appropriate agent in POL or POD. At the same time all the transportation costs will be associated only with one stage of transportation.
    Do anybody has an idea how to split payment term deeper than level of stage?

    Hi,
    You can use the "Flexible Settlement" function in TM9.1.
    Assign the charge types to settlement group.
    Assign the settlement group to settlement rule.
    Assign the settlement rule to settlement profile.
    Best Regards
    Clark Huang

  • Single invoice for multiple payment terms

    Hi Friends,
    I have given 2 different payment terms for 2 line items in single order and the billing is splitted due to this reason. I want to know where the system is checking this control. Because I want to create single Invoive even the payment terms are different. (The routine 003 under Data VBRK/VBRP in SO to Bill copy controls will be usefull only to create single Invoice for multiple SO's where the payment terms is same). But I need to create single Invoice even for multiple payment terms.
    Can anyone suggest me at the earliest please.
    Kumar

    Hi Kumar,
    The Billing Split is take care at Copy control level.
    For multiple line items in one single SO, with different Payment terms is not acceptable as per the  business logic and its not best practices.
    Please suggest the business to go on Split method only.
    Or
    Try to use Proforma Invoice Concept.
    Regards
    Srini

Maybe you are looking for