Payment terms picked up incorrectly in ERP while posting MIRO on SRM PO's

Payment terms are picked up incorrectly in our ERP backend system for all SRM PO's and it generally defaults to "free for payment" standard payment term.
1) We have maintained our vendor master correctly - say NET 30 but it still defaults to  "free for payment" when we are posting a MIRO invoice.
2) Baseline date is blank too.
3) We have not maintained BBPV_PTERM_LOCAL table either.
Please let me know if any OSS note or solution available on this?
Thanks,
Manoj

Hi,
remember that there are TWO payment terms fields on the vendor master.
One is used by POs and the other is used for postings that do not involve a PO.
You should check the payment terms on the company code data of the vendor and make sure that these are correct, the payment terms on the Purchasing Org data are NOT used by FI postings unless you are using MIRO with reference to a PO.
Steve B

Similar Messages

  • Error while posting MIRO

    Hi Experts
    I got a error like this while posting MIRO
    "No amount authorization for customers/vendors in company code 401"
    I tried to look out in T043 Table,since i cant able to go further
    Let me know the reason for this error and the settings to do
    Regards
    Amuthan M

    Hi,
    While creating tolerance group you are specified the authorization group/ Just delete the name of the group you have created and keep it blank OR assign the user to that group and save.
    Note:
    If you create tolerance groups then the group must be assigned to the users in t.code:OB57 who are posting the transaction. Defining and assigning the tolerance groups to employees is not going to solve, you have to enter the amount ranges of tolerance for G/L document, Customer and Vendor posting.
    In t.code:OBA4 create an entry for your company code. (Group creation is not compulsory). If your requirement permits better keep the group column empty. when no group is created its for all users.Double click on company code and enter upper limits and permitted payment differences and save.In t.code:OBA3 enter the ranges for payment differences and any other columns as per your requirement..
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Dealer Excise Invoice-Issue while posting MIRO

    Dear All,
    Today i was doing Domestic procurement with Dealer for Gas Cylinder. In PO we entered total value which includes Excise amount also (1000+103)& VAT @ 14% (154,42).
    While doing GR i selected as Only captured excise inv, checked MRP indicator.
    Changed the bse value to 1000, entered BED as 100, E Cess as 2 & SEcess as 1.
    The accounting entries were correct, Inventory is posting with Rs 1000
    Posted excise invoice in J1IEX, the values were coming from GR, its correct and the acc entries were also OK with 103 Cenvat clearing acc Cr & Excise acc Dr.
    While posting MIRO, I am facing problems...
    In line item i am getting as 1103 Base value...
    VAT is calculating on (1103+103) @ 14% 168.84,
    so total value is 1271.84
    When i simulate, its showing
    Vendor 1271.84 Cr
    GR/IR clg acc 1000 Dr
    Material 103 Dr
    VAT 168,84 Dr
    There is no cenvat clearing account here
    Please help me how to resolve this.
    Regds,
    CB
    When i simulate

    Hi,
    have you mainatin 100% setoof condition check it it should be there
    check MIRo posting date and excise invoice  posting date
    check condition record validity in FV13
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale
    Edited by: kailasugale on Feb 10, 2012 12:01 PM

  • FI:While posting MIRO getting Error of Balancing field Segment not filled

    Hello SAP Gurus,
    While  posting MIRO getting Error of Balancing field Segment in line item 001 not filled
    Message No.GLT2201.
    Please suggest me solution for it i read lots of related threats but could not solve this error.

    SPRO-Financial Accounting (New)-General Ledger Accounting (New)-Business Transactions-Document Splitting-Edit Constants for Nonassigned Processes-Select your constant-Double click and Select Assignment of profit center- Enter your dummy profit center here   otherwise
    SPRO-Financial Accounting (New)-General Ledger Accounting (New)-Business Transactions-Document Splitting-Edit Constants for Nonassigned Processes-Select your constant-Double click and Select Assignment of values-Enter here segment.

  • While posting miro

    while posting miro iam getting one error
    ie: taxcode v0  country in is not defined in tax procesure lcltax
    but i defined that tax code in my tax procesure and i assigned that to country(In)

    HI SAI VANI
    U have to assign the Tax code to ur co cd. The T.Code for that is OBCl. Just check whether u have assigned that TAxcode to ur CO Cd or not.
    Assign me points if it helps u.
    Regards
    Rajaram

  • Document splitting issue while posting MIRO transaction

    Hello All
    I have a piculiar  related to document splitting while posting MIRO entry and this issue started after defaulting the profit center
    to the tax gl.
    The scenario is like this
    While posting a vendor invoice document where there is a difference in the invoice value and stock is allready consumedn
    hence system will try to post the difference to the material difference account.
    The following is the asccounting entries
    01 vendor a/c  cr   1000
    02 gr/ir a/c  dr         800       pc from po document
    03 tax g/l                 180       default pc
    04 inventory diff       20  
    the error message
    system is not able to determine the profit center at  line item 04 and message is
    Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 004 not filled
    The document splitting settings are all standards related to vendor invoice ..................
    One important point to be noted here is that this issue is come after defaulting the profit center at tax gl.
    But we cannot remove those default pc also.
    Can be their any solution on this
    Kindly suggest
    Thanks

    Hi
    In addition to my previous mail i want to add that
    i tried to add even expense item category to splitting rule of business transaction and transaction variant.
    Even then it doers not work.
    other then is as per standard document splitting rule the expense item category is not included in invoice verication buisness transaction.
    Thanks
    alok

  • Wrong PAyment Term Picked During MIRO

    Hello,
    I have an issue,
    1) I create PO .
    2) Then do MIGO and assign DELIVERY NOTE Feild .
    3) Then Further I create a MIRO giving DELIVERY NOTE feild as 'PO REFRERNCE' .
    NOw During MIRO its picking Wrong PAYMENT TERM.
    I checked Vendor master for PAYMENT TERM its maintained properly.
    I even checked OBB8 for proper assignment of Payment Terms.
    Eg For Vendor -123 Payment Term assigned is '3000'
    in PO its picking 3000
    but During MIRO it gives Incorrect Value '9000'
    Kindly suggest.
    Thanks & Regards,

    In MRM_PAYMENT_TERM
    Payment term feild (ZTERM) is not Export parameter,how can we Use this..
    It picks wrong payment term when Delivery note is selected During MIRO for 'PO Reference'
    If he uses PO number it gives correct payment term..
    Regards,

  • Incoming payment by F-28: Reason code error while posting

    Hello everyone,
    I want to post Incoing Payment using F-28 net of TDS. I want the separate GL account to be picked up automatically for the difference when I enter the Reason Code 003.
    I did the following customization for the same.
    1. Financial Accounting> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable> Business Transactions>Incoimng Payments> Incoming Payments Global Settings>Overpayment/Underpayment> Define Reason Codes:- Here I selected the Indicator 'C' for reason code 003 which is for "Indicator: Charge off difference via separate account". The reason code 003 is for TDS Netted
    2. Below the Define Reason Code node, I selected the node 'Define Accounts for Payment Differences' . Selected the key ' Rules' and selected the checkbox 'Reason Code'. Then clicked on 'Accounts' and enetered the desired GL account against the reason code '003'.
    After doing the above customization I posted the Incoming payment using T code F-28. I entered the difference in the field 'Difference Posting'. Then entered reason code '003' which is for 'TDS netted' in the field 'Reason Code'. Now, I am getting the follwoing error.
    Reason codes with automatic charge-off are not permitted here
    Message no. F5605
    Diagnosis
    The reason code entered is designed to ensure that the payment difference amount is posted to an account specially set up for this purpose.  Postings of this nature usually require additional specifications (e.g. tax code, business area). If the difference stems from a single open item, the necessary specifications can be taken from that item. In the case that led to this error message, however, the difference does not stem soley from one item, which means that this method cannot be used.
    System Response
    The reason code entered is not accepted.
    Procedure
    You can either select a different reason code, which would create a new open item for the customer or vendor OR write off the difference using the function Charge off diff.. This function either takes you into a pre-configured account assignment model or into the document overview. From here you can enter the required difference postings.
    How can I proceed ahead?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Pradnya

    Hi Saulo,
    Thanks for ur reply.
    I had alreay done the config in OBXL and OBBE. Only thing I wanted to know is while posting Incoming Payment by F-28, how to use this reason code.
    Ur reply was a gr8 help for me.
    Regards,
    Pradnya

  • Value in payment terms field not dispalyed in invoice after saving MIRO

    Hi,
    I Implemented the BADI- MRM_PAYMENT_TERMS to populate GR date as baseline date in invoice,
    But after saving the invoice when I display the invoice document in MIR4 it not showing the payment terms. It only show the condition ie the discount get in no of days. It show
    payment terms - (Blank)
    Payment in - 14 days 4%
    payment in - 30 days 2 % .
    Can anybody help me on this why this peculiar behavior of transaction after activating BADI.....
    Regards,
    Aditya
    Edited by: Aditya rayalu on Jan 28, 2011 7:37 AM

    Hi,
    have a look at this OSS Note:
    Note 432332 - MIR4 - Field ZTERM is not filled
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/432332
    Best regards.

  • Region to pick based on branch vendor while doing MIRO

    Dear All,
    following is the scenario :
    PO is created on branch vendor (with a HO vendor mentioned in master). While doing MIRO, the system automatically replaces the branch vendor with the Head office vendor (as mentioned in master).  The region taken for tax purpose is the region of the HO vendor.
    Now the requirement is that, while doing the MIRO, the system should pick up the region of the branch vendor and not HO vendor. Will have to create/ write an exit or  use substitution.
    Can somebody eleborate how should the logic be mapped for exit in connection with substitution?
    Thanks,
    Tapan

    Dear Alok,
    Thanks for the reply. We actually already started to work on it. But, as we want to replace HO vendor with branch vendor during MIRO as already mentioned, we are still awaiting what logic should be mapped in substitution as well as exit for that.
    It would be great help if you can throw some light on the same.
    Thanks
    Tapan

  • Incorrect documents error while posting

    Hi Gurus,
    While posting the documents for a couple of pernrs for the period 08/2009  I am getting the following error.
    "Period 007 in fiscal year 2009 is open for posting for the variant for posting periods 0001. However, you do not have the required authorization."
    I have already posted the correct documents for these pernrs for period 07/2009 .
    I am not sure why its popping a mssg for period 007/2009
    Also the the status of the payroll control record is Exit payroll 08/2009
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Hi,.
    Somewhere missed fiscal year variant periods in the t.code OB29.
    If you dont have authorization, Pls concern your FI team they will know where to define fiscal year period 007 and posting period 0001.
    If they dont have authorization get the authorization from the basis team. then do the task.
    Good luck
    Devi

  • Error while posting MIRO - PO is changed

    Dear Guru's
    I am getting an error message
    PO is changed
    Message no. ZFI_INWARD_REG026
    while posting the invoice using Miro ..
    I know this custom message  But how to debug /clear this error message. I do checked in the OMRM - Error message is not maintained in that.
    guide me to solve this..
    Regards
    Anandh

    Hi
      I have found the error message under  Enhancement - Classic BADI (impl) - IF_EX_INVOICE_UPDATE~CHANGE_BEFORE_UPDATE method
    IF wa_ti_mrmrseg-ebeln IS NOT INITIAL.
        IF wa_ti_mrmrseg-ebeln NE wa_inward_reg_no-po_number.
          MESSAGE e026(zfi_inward_reg).
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
      --- How to find the reason for triggering this message and how to resolve this issue.
    regards
    anand

  • Accounting error while posting MIRO

    Hi Gurus,
                    An GRN is created with amount 150000 and IV is made using this GRN of 145000. Here reversal document debitted 5000 to expense account is not getting posted. An entry getting posted is of 145000. Please help.

    A Grn has been posted with entries as follows:
    Expense A/c  Dr 150000
      to GR A/c                       150000
    While posting IV for 145000, following entry needs to be posted
    GR A/c  Dr             150000
        To Vendor A/c                         145000
        To Expense A/c                           5000 (Automatic entry)
    Instead following wrong entry is getting posted
    GR A/c  Dr             145000
           To Vendor A/c                         145000.
    I hope this clarifies the doubt.

  • Tax error while posting MIRO

    Hi All,
    Im currently facing following prob "While in MIRO posting, error coming as tax procedure V1 not maintained in TAXEXL" .
    Pls let me know how to go ab taxation prob ??

    Please check procedures maintained in the tax type mentioned. If V1 is given. If not please assign input tax.
    Hope this will help.

  • While posting MIRO price difference account is not determimg for price vari

    Hi Sapients,
    Please solve the production issue which we have faced yesterday while doing month end closing
    In one P.O 4 items are there,User has posted entries in below sequence
    Material type is TRADING GOODS
    1)first MIRO with QTY 10 @100$ each,Later
    2)MIGO has done with QTY 10 @100$
    Raw Material account -
    1000$
    to GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
    1000$
    2)User has reverse the MIRO transaction with QTY 10 @ 100$ each.(with refer to step1)
    3)Finally he post MIRO with QTY 10 @ 90$ each, so here ther is no qty variance has come only price variance has come, so when posting the difference is not going to price difference and the entry is paasing like this
    GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
    900$
    TO Vendor 900$
    If u see in step 2 GR/IR having 1000$, but in step 3 while MIRO posting GR/IR as 900$ so for the remaing balance 100$ not going to price variance .I Belive the entry in step will be like this
    GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
    1000$
    TO Vendor 900$
    TO Price difference 100$.
    Kindly give solution why it is not going to price difference it was happening only for item 2 & 3 only for 40 iem it is posting correctly to price difference account.Please advice me why system behavig differently for each item.
    Thanks & Regards
    YSR

    Hi Padmasri,
    Thanks for your explanation. Ok. if the price is maintained in S, does that mean the price difference would get posted only to PRD. In other words, if price indicator is V, is that the only time when the price difference gets posted to stock account. In case if there is no sufficient stock or if there is negative stock at that time, that's when the amount would get posted to stock loss or gain account. Please suggest if I've understood the concept right.
    Hi,
    The PRD will trigger when the standard price maintained in the material mater record is different from the price in MIGO . The other chance is the material is maintained with MAP and MIRO done before GR ,The value of the quntity (not available in stock )
    will get posted to PRD. I hope this will resolve your issue. Thanking you
    You had suggested: The other chance is the material is maintained with MAP and MIRO done before GR ,The value of the quntity (not available in stock ) will get posted to PRD. I hope this will resolve your issue.
    You are right: I forgot to mention that the price indicator is V. The other point is we purchase the materials from an internal vendor, as and when the materials are dispatched from the main storehouse in Sri Lanka, there is an advice that is created in the system and that is interfaced and parked in the system. However, normally until the GR is done IV will not happen. But there could be a chance, as the advice gets created within 24 hours. However the material to reach the godown in our warehouse will take more than 24 hours as the goods have to be shipped from SL, so IV is possible before GR.
    Regards,
    Soujanya

Maybe you are looking for