Payroll Error....

Hello Experts,
I have an issue while I am running payroll....
Issue is as follows....... there are semi-monthly employees..... for whome the payment date for 24th pay period (16/12/2009-31/12/2009) is on 05/01/2010.
But when I am running the payroll for 24th period, it is doing retro to 23rd period and is throwing an error saying negative amounts are not allowed in TCRT for wage type /302.
It is running retro as employees went on short term disability effect 07/12/2009, but this change was made on 16/12/2009 after 23rd payroll was run.
When employees are on STD they will not pay any social security taxes. Now even if we think that system is trying to repay him the amount that was witheld previously. His social was maxed out in 19th period itself. he did not paid anything from there on.
If I delet the earliest master date change in IT03 and run then it is running fine........ and i checked there are no adjustement payroll run for these employees........
Now, my issue is....... why is it throwing this error....... and will it effect his W2 for the year 2009? If I change IT 03 and run the payroll.
There are 8-9 employees like this..... for some the social was maxed out........ and for some it is still on........
All suggestions are highly appreciated...... and rwrded.......
Thanks In advance.......
Thanks,
Janga K.

Find out whether there was any manual checks - goto PUOC_10 and see the payroll history with payment type manual check(M)
There should have been IT0221 entries causing this problem. Please consult with tax/ payroll user to correct this entries.
Note:For quick response on US payroll related, pease open thread in US Payroll forum.

Similar Messages

Sap Payroll error log report

Hi All,
We are developing Report on SAP Payroll log with the error message . Is any table exist in SAP where we can get the standard error message repositery and then convert it in the User freindly error message ?
Thanks
H

Hello hg,
Before developing report on SAP Payroll error log I suggest taking a look at below blog. There is a new functionality from SAP to improve payroll data validation and they are calling it "Control Center Add-On".
This is going to be a free add on for anyone who is on EHP7 and NetWeaver on 7.4 release. The general availability is June 2nd 2014.
Improve payroll data validation with SAP Payroll control center add-on
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Hemanth Jamithi.

Payroll Error msg "The gross wages do not cover the negative offset that has been forwarded, therefore, no grossup is permitted".

Hi Experts,
I am getting the below error msg while running payroll for an US employee.
"The gross wages do not cover the negative offset that has been forwarded; therefore, no grossup is permitted."
I am getting this error msg just after USTAX function processing part of UTX0 subschema. I am highlighting below facts & findings for your reference.
As per a client requirement, I have configured a new gross up WT (ER benefit contribution) for a benefit plan (IT 0168) and the changes are in QAS system. The changes have to be reflected in period 20/2014 (4th May'14- 10th May'14) with retro effective 01/01/2014 as per the benefit plan record maintained from 01/01/2014.
This error msg is coming only for few employees. In my example, when I am running payroll in period 20/2014 with forced retro as 01/01/2014, system is giving error in period 14/2014 (23rd Mar'14-29th Mar'14). When I checked the pay result of this employee for period 14/2014, I can see the /101 is in -ve value and there is claim generated for this period. So I think, eventhough, a value of $ 2.53 is getting added as per the IT 0168 record, its not helping to give a +ve gross value and thus tax is not able to recoved on the same.
I hope you have come across this issue and can help me to assist to resolve the error msg.
Regards,
Prakash

If you have correctly configured payroll the system should automatically off set that and should create wage tyes /561 or /563 in RT.

HR-payroll Error in simulation

hello experts
i am getting error in simulation plz guide me . how to resolve it.Error msg is shown below.
P2003 S** DPS Insert Shift Substitutions in PWS
No entry in table T556 for key 02
thnxs
aditi .....
Please do not Raise the thread with Two Different ids Gaurav

Hi Kamal,
PLease select payroll area and check the dates for current period.
Regards,
Vandana,

OFF-Cycle payroll error Resigned employee

Hi Experts,
I have a very typical problem here faced by the employee ;-
The scenario is this
Employee resigned during the last year , his payroll area changed to inactive
The last results available in the cluster for the employee belongs to period somewhere in june 2008 month of resignation
In the current financial year , company wants to pay bonus to the employee.
So the employee was again put in to active payroll area with effective date 01..09.2009 for processing the payroll usiing 0267
In Infotype 0003 , the run up to date has been updated has 30.09.2009
in pa03 , the payroll control record has the status has the exit in the Aug-2009 , not yet released in Sep-09
so ideally , when wwe are processing the off-cycle after the above mentioned steps, it should process the payroll in off-cycle.
In the simulation it is processing, but coming with a message that
" Payment date of payroll 04.09.2009 later than period end of next payroll 31.08.2009"
But when we try to finalise the cases it is throwing up the error mentioning the same.
We are not able to finalise the Off-Cycle payroll for such cases.
Anyone please can help me in this ?
Thanks & Regards
Srijit R Menon

Hi Sadhu / Sikandar,
Thanks for the reply,
I checked with CYFRM , it is given as 1 only,
again , for the terminated employees the final run was made in the month they were terminated., in june-08
And while doing offcycle run does the payroll driver checks the past period resuts, i m not sure
even if it checks , the offcycle is allowing me in quality system with the same data , data in quality & Production is equal, as we have updated our quality system recently by copying the production.
In Quality its working , and not giving any errors and issues, the pa03 is also in the exit mode of aug-09 , the payment date is given as 04.09.2009 in 0267 . its allowiing me to simullate and final it
Kindly help

Off-Cycle Payroll Error for Bonus

Hi Experts,
I am getting one error while i am running the off-cylce payroll live run for the employees.
Current payroll payment date 31.03.2009 less than last payroll payment date
31.08.2009
I maintained the payment date as 31.03.2009 in Employee master data..........and also in off-cylce field also i maintained same date.
i don't under stand where i am doing wrong.
Thanks in Advance,
KB

Maintain the payment as off-cycle payable date in the pc00_m40_bons.Then execute the program.
For forther clarification open the new thread
Thanks,
KB

Off Cycle Payroll error - not encountered during Payroll Simulation

Hello,
We've modified the Canadian payroll schema K000 by creating some new subschemas, rules and payroll operations to address calculation of the factor /801. When running payroll simulation for a test employee, everything looks fine. However when we run off cycle payroll for the same employee and period, we are encountering an error. Checking the log of off cycle, it shows that it is also accessing schema K000.
What could have caused the OC error? is there a difference in what off cycle and simulation accesses?
Thanks.
Malou Navera

I assume that you copied the K000 and create a new custom schema called ZK00 or YK00 or something else other than K000.
Go to this table V_T52OCV and set up an entry with
CALC RPCALCK0 PayrollVariantName
"PayrollVariantName" is your variant with your custom schema for RPCALCK0.
Or goto IMG
Payroll: Canada
Off-Cycle Activities
Set up report variants for off-cycle activities
Edited by: Amosha on Oct 4, 2011 9:30 AM

Payroll Error: Retirement earnings may not exceed Gross Remuneration

Hi guys,
I get the following error message when i run my payroll...Retirement earnings may not exceed Gross Remuneration. Any suggestions as to how i can solve this problem? Would be appreciated.
thanks.
Lynnette

Hello Lynnette,
There are certain wage types in your payroll not cumulated to /101 (Gross cumulation) but /102 (401K Gross which is retirement gross).
As Howard said, go to RPDLGA20 and look for those wage types and their cumulation class.
Arti

Payroll Error - IndVal of Wage Type

We are getting an error in payroll results when we enter certain positions as substitutes on the time sheet (PA61).
In PALP X012 GEN: the error is:
IndVal of wage type 0001: No entry in table T511 for key 0001 on 20090502
Since this is only happening for some position substitutions and not all, I am not sure were to look to correct the error.
Any ideas?
Thanks

Function PALP processes all entries in the internal table ALP triggered
by generic rule (in the SAP standard system, PC Rule X012).
Hourly rates are determined according to the specifications in the
calculation rule and placed in internal table IT as valuation bases with
an ALP split.
So i guess, system is not able to get Hourly Rates for those substituted positions for that period/date.
Regards
...Sadhu

Payroll error: No entry in table T549A for key

Hi whilw running payroll, there is a error
No entry in table T549A for key
what could be the possible reason. there are 2 payroll areas one for monthly and the other for semi monthly. this is for semi monthly. monthly is running fine.
-request help on this

Hi,
Go to the perticular table and check whether you have maintained any entries for Payroll area and date modifier for semi monthly period parameter also check whether run payroll bos is checked or not.
Regards

I am getting Payroll error in "Customizing Error in Work Schedule Rule"

Hi,
Iam using SAP HR ECC6.0. While running payroll i am facing an error saying "Customizing Error in Work Schedule Rule". I checked all my work schedule related configuration everything is correct. I have checked the Manual Work Schedule Creation. My Work Schedule is getting displayed for current year. Can anyone help me out in this.
Lakshmi

Hi Naveen,
How are you? I created the work schedule again and checked both Infotypes 0007 and 0001. My grouping is there. But now i am getting error saying "Payroll not possible because data is missing. No entry in Table WPBP". But i checked in SM30 there is no such table in the directory. I really don't know what kind of error is this?
Lakshmi

Canadian Payroll error

Hi guys,
I m working on payroll canada, and trying generate payroll. I m getting following error
Provincial data does not start on : 2011/01/01
for personnel assignment: 70280
for province of employment : ON
I alraedy have a valid record on It461 , it462, it463 and it464. record valid from 2011/01/01 to 9999/12/31 for employee 70280.
but still having error.
Please help me to resolve this error.
Thanks in advance.
Sanju.

Hi Howard, Rémi Corriveau
Thank you for your replies.
I have stored following values.
For it461
Province of emp : ON
Emp juridisdiction : on
prov residence : ON
valid from : 2011/01/01 to : 9999/12/31
For IT 462
Province : ON
tax credits : 8.148,00
valid from : 2011/01/01 to : 9999/12/31
For IT 463
total credits : 8.148,00
valid from : 2011/01/01 to : 9999/12/31
For IT 464
Province of employment : ON
valid from : 2011/01/01 to : 9999/12/31
regards
Sanju

Payroll Error: very urgent

While running apyroll, following is the error:
"PIT X070 GEN NOAB: error for whatever wage type is still in IT"
I checked the log, the wt listed is a technical wt, with a specific date, and when i checked the ee's IT 2010 with that date and amount, i find an incentive wage type.
Can anyone help me recognize what could cause this error.
Thanks

Rule X070 is accessed if table IT is not empty for the personnel number at the end of payroll accounting.
Can you check the table IT and see what does it have?

Global Payroll-Error

Hi,
When i run payroll i get the following error
No prior segment found for Payee %1, %2 for Calendar %3 for Version %4 / Revision %5
%1--> 00000034138
%2--> 0
%3--> FOA WKLY
%4--> 1
%5--> 1
Application Program Failed
In Pgm Section : GPPIDNT6: DETERMINE-MAX-SEGMENT
at pos 00028
at pos 00028
at pos 00028
at pos 00028
at pos 00028
at pos 00028
at pos 00028
at pos 00028
at pos 00028
at pos 00028
at pos 00028
at pos 00028
at pos 00028
at pos 00028
at pos 00028
at pos 00028
at pos 00028
Application Program Failed
In Pgm Section : GPPIDNT1: XA000-CALL-GPPIDNT6
Application Program Failed
In Pgm Section : GPPSERVC: LH000-CALL-IDENTIFY-PGM
Application Program Failed
In Pgm Section : GPPDPRUN: JA000-CALL-SERVICE
Process ended : 15:09:06/60
The process terminated with ERRORS .
Can anyone tell me what is the issue & what needs to be done??
Thanks

Hi,
Looks like this payee data is not correct. You can try to look at the Job data(hire date Vs segment bgn dt of ur calendar...etc.)
Technically the best way would be to go into the stored statement for the cbl program GPIDNT6 and try to figure out the SQL which is causing the error, in this way you can get to the discrepancy in payee data by analysing the SQLs in the stored statement for the respective payee.
Vikas

IT0007 Change Mid Month/Payroll error

Geeks,
I have a situation wherein I need to change the WSR of a employee mid- month - which I did thru PA30 by creating a new IT7 with start date as 14 july 2014 (below is the overview screen shot of IT7 after change)
With Basic as 5000, I ran his payroll from 01-july 2014 to 31-july 2014, but when I look the form, its displaying Basic as 3518 (I haven assigned any unpaid or LOP). Can anybody help me out in knowing wht mistake m I doing?
regards
Tahir

In the IT to or from INP1, I can see that the Partial Period Parameters WageTypes /801, /802, /803 and /806 all total 100% (or 10.000,000), while /804 totals 70.37% and /805 totals 174.19%.
In the IT from XVAL, it can be seen that all valued WageTypes were done so by using /804.
I am not familiar with Payroll for India, but here are a two questions :
1 - If your Payroll Schema includes function PRINT with Par1 = NP and Par2 = PART, check your Partial Period Parameters and try to identify why /804 totals 70.37%.
2 - What kind of Absences or Attendances has the employee to justify that ratio?
You have mentioned that "Basic Salary" WT 1000 has Pr.Cl.10 with value 04, meaning that Partial Period Parameter /804 will be used for the factoring of that WT, and that is what happens.
The solution to your problem lies in understanding why the factors /802 and /804 are identical for the first portion of the payroll period but are different for the second part of the period.
3   /802   01     40 740,74
3   /802   02     59 259,26
3   /804   01     40 740,74
3   /804   02     29 626,63

Payroll Error....

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for