PB00 Adoption for Contract to PO

Hi Guys,
Initially, I will create a Contract with Item Category "M" - Material Unknown
After I adopt this contract into Purchase Order, I will key in the material number at this point.
The info record already exist.
The question I would like to ask is, is there anyway to make the Purchase Order pull the Price from Info Record instead of Contract once the Material Number is keyed in for Pricing condition PB00 in Info Record.
Or is there any note I could refer to? I've checked note 456691, but so far no luck on that,
Thanks

Hi,
You can achieve thus requirement by making some changes to access sequence of PB00 i.e., 0002 gross price...
If you create contract with item category material unknown(M), then if you create PO with ref to contract then price PB00 is picked from step number 15 (table 16) in access sequence.
If you create plant specific info record for material then it is picked from step number 25 (table 17).
So what you have to do is insert a new step in access sequence 0002 as below
step no 14
Table 17
Requirement 35
Exclusion X
And delete step number 25
Better to copy access sequence 0002 and do changes here and assign it to your PB00
cheers,
Regards
Satish

Similar Messages

  • Open Qty for Contracts in Purchasing

    Hi,
    Is there a standard config for Open Target Quantities for Contracts, as there is for standard POs (there is Open Qty - 0BO_QTY - within the 0PUR_DS03 transformation), but I need to show an Open Target Qty for Contracts.
    The value exists within RM06A, field name OFZMG but it is not part of the standard Purchasing extractors, whereas the Target Qty is.
    Any advise appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Scott

    Hi Daniel,
    Thanks for the reply.
    Yeah, I know how to enhance the standard extractors but the logistics extractors are different where the standard LIS extractors actually contain a whole load of additional fields that you can ehnance via LBWE.
    If I enhance these with the append structure and some code, then it could cause issues with enhancing via the standard LBWE in the future.
    Thanks,
    Scott

  • Release Strategy for Contract is not getting picked whereas it is ok for PO

    Dear Experts,
    I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
    I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
    Kindly resolve the issue.
    Satish

    S0004830404 wrote:
    Dear Experts,
    >
    > I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
    > I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
    >
    > Kindly resolve the issue.
    >
    > Satish
    hi,
    use create other characteristic for value CEKKO-GNETW in this use the mk , wk values in value field and assign this characteristic to your class and save.
    Thanking you

  • MIS report : Daily Cumulative Report for contract in SD module

    Hi All,
               Do you have any idea about MIS report in SD module.actually my requirement is that
    i have to generate daily cumulative report for contract. that means at time i am selecting ten plants
    and correspondingly sum of  total quantity,average rate and average weight of all the contracts for particular plant  should be displayed in a column and various existing flavours should be displayed in a row.
    for above requirement following output format is there:
    plant ->           plant1               plant2              plant3 ....   .....
    flavour             quantity  rate     quantity  rate
    cumulative
    total cumulative
    please refer sample code,if any.
    Thks & Regards
    Shailesh

    Hi,
    You can ask your functional people what are the required fields to develop a report below are the table.
    customer related tables:
    KNA1 Customer master General Data
    KNB1 Customer Master – Co. Code Data
    KNKK Customer Master Credit Control Area Data
    KNVV Sales Area Data
    KNVI Customer Master Tax Indicator
    KNVP Partner Function
    KNVD Output type
    KNVS Customer Master Ship Data
    KLPA Customer/Vendor Link
    Sales Documents
    VBAK Sales Document - Header Data
    VBAP Sales Document - Item Data
    VBUK Header Status and Administrative Data
    VBKD Sales Document - Business Data
    VBUP Item Status
    VBPA Partners
    VBFA Document Flow
    VBEP Sales Document Schedule Line
    VBBE Sales Requirements: Individual Records
    Delivery Document
    LIKP Delivery header table
    LIPS Delivery item table
    Billing document:
    VBRK Billing document header table
    VBRP Billing Document Item table
    Shipping
    VEKP Shipping Header Table
    VEPO Shipping Item Table
    Thanks
    VIkranth

  • Purchase Order not subject to release strategy for contract rel. strategy

    Hello, I am trying to set release strategy for contracts (TCODE: ME31K). I have created characteristic, which use table CEKKO and field name BSTYP in Addnl data tab. I have checked values, and they are correct. Then I have assigned in release strategies in classification view value contract. But when I try to check release strategy in ME31K with green flag, it display error: Purchase Order not subject to release strategy. (I have tried to do the same strategy in purchase order, of course with value Purchase order, and it works nice).
    So I have checked this release strategy with this codes:
    CL24N ok,
    CT04 ok,
    CL30N ok,
    CL20N ok,
    Release simulation in release strategy works,
    Then I found out that I should check SE38, SE37 but I do not understand how to use them (according: Purchasing Document Not Subject to Release Strategy).
    Thank you for your help in advance.

    I haven't said to use EKPO table in characteristics. You have to use CEKKO - BSTYP in characteristics.
    I've just said the compare the value which you have given in Release strategy - Classification and EKPO table for the particular contract.
    Also compare your release strategy settings with many existing documents in SCN.
    Check your Classification should be like that.
    You may see the error message in ME31K. Just save the contract then go to ME32K/ME33K or ME35K you can see the release strategy will effect for the contract.

  • Tables for contract account receivables & payables

    Dear Members
    I would like to know tables for contract account receivables & payables.
    1)header
    2) line items.
    when we run report by t-code FPL9 we get information line itemwise. this information coming from which table.?
    Kindly inform me tables & not strcutures.
    regards
    Satish

    Hi
    Please check table DFKKKO and DFKKOP
    Award points if found useful.
    Regards,
    K Lakshmanan

  • Tables for Contract data

    Hi all,
    if you know any tables for contract data(For Contract report),
    please tell me.....
    Thanks,
    kishore.

    VBAK-contract header
    VBAP-contract item
    VEDA-changed contracts
    KONV-condition records
    MARA-material related to contract

  • Down payment request for contract with periodic billing

    Hi Friends,
    Could anyone help me in understanding the configuration settings for down payment / advance payment senario for a CONTRACT which has Order related billing (I have done for Order with milestone billing plan).
    The contract has order related *periodic billing plan* where settlement period is suppose quaterly billing and actual invoice is happening on 1st date of the quarter. But i want to create a down payment request say 10 days before the billing date[(actual invoice(F2) date] of every quater as an advance payment/ down payment.
    FYI...
    For order i am using standard billing rule 1 in milestone billing plan for final invoice but for downpaymnet billing dates (added additional settlement periods then actual invoice settlement period like 3 adv pay ment og 20%, 30% 50% & one actual invoice period for whole amount 100% as D4 doc only) i am manually changing the billing rule as 4 to create a down payment req.
    But in contract as its has periodic billing plan no billing rule changing option (no additional settlement period can be added, only settlement period for actual invoice is getting proposed) so i can't have two different rule for a settlement period. no settlement period can be added separately for adv paymnet/down payment.
    Kindly respond ASAP.
    Rgds
    Manish

    Hi, Many thanks for your response.
    But the down payment functionality for a SO with milestone billing i have already implemented.
    The question was for CONTRACT Side (say rental / service contract). The contract has periodic billing (monthly / Q'ly).
    Kindly let me know if you/anyone has any idea for config settings for a contract with the senario mentioned in previous thread post.
    Thnx & Rgds
    MG

  • CLM - Maximum File Size for Contract Documents

    We did a search but did not find an answer for this.  For the CLM system does anybody know SAP's recommendation on the maximum file size that the application can reliably handle for contract documents?  We recently increased the maximum file size from 10MB to 50MB to accommodate a larger than allowed file size.  Now the business has requested the capacity to add files (pdf files) up to 115MB.  Would increasing our file limit to approximately 150MB be within the recommended parameters?

    There is no specific recommendation for maximum file sizes as this depends on how your time-out parameters are set, your server resources and network (also tunneling policies).  The fact is the higher the filesize the more risk you run in unreliable uploads.  Compressing files before uploading is a good practise for larger files.
    These are the same issues which you would run into if you for example upload to a sharepoint site or even a copy on a shared drive, it all depends on the same parameters. 
    Tunneling policies could also affect your performance as it will limit the upload speeds according the priority set on certain network activities and if it limits your bandwidth you run in the risk of time-out so as you see there is no straight answer to your question.  I know customers who can without no problem upload 150Mb files and others who already have issues with 50Mb.
    Unfortunate, as I do not know your architecture and infrastructure I can only advice to stresstest the conditions of 150 Mb uploades with several user ids and see if you get time-outs or if it degrades the network performance. One of the questions you should ask your business is how frequent are the occurences of 150Mb+ uploads and if it is the appropiate way.  It could be that these are very rare and in that case you could ask them to do this outside the busy hours of the network which will provides you less risk in problems.

  • Objectclass for change documents for contracts using condition record no.

    I want the changes for price, Price per and currency for contract based on the info record number and contion record number.
    Presently i am using object class is COND_A. But if user changes  multiple times price, price per and currency by deleting existing price  and created new price or price per or currency, this case it is saving only latest data based on the change document.
    I want to change the logic as based on the change document, i will display the all changes of price, price per and Currency.
    Could you suggest object class for this?

    Hello,
    Please check with the following user exit for the requirement that you have cited :
    1. USEREXIT_XKOMV_FUELLEN_O_KONP (SAPLV61A) ( RV61AFZB ).
    2. EXIT_SAPLV45L_001
    Kindly check with these two above user exit and let me know if your requirement is fulfilled.
    Regards,
    Sarthak

  • RE: PO Workflow for Contract(me32k)

    Hi friends,
    I created a custom workflow for contract wherein I gave a condition check before the mail goes to the initiator that after all the approvers approve then only send the email.
    The problem here is even after assigning the linkage in swe2, the workflow is not getting triggered.
    What i observe here is there is no linkage in swec. Is it something to do with.
    When i check in the log, the custom workflow is not getting triggered in the first place and the standard one does.
    Any help is appreciated!
    Thanks

    Hi,
    purchasing workflow (including contracts) are usually started by an event from the release strategy, not by the change documents.
    If an event is raised which starts the standard workflow this means that the event customizing is active.
    check:
    the event log - swel - (activation by swels) for behavior of the workflows (yours and the standard)
    just to make sure, check that you marked the linkage as active in swe2
    check starting conditions (if you added them)
    check that the same event is used to start the workflows
    check the event binding of your workflow

  • N level-Approval for contract workflow (WS14000148) in SRM

    Hi SDN'rs
                  I want to activate N level-Approval for contract workflow (WS14000148) in SRM  
    When I am creating the contract in SRM I can see the approvers in the approval preview.
    But when I release the contract and look at the approval privew there are no approvers
    and the status of the contract is released.
    We are on SRM Server 5.5 and SP 07.
    Here what I did
    1. I implemented the BADI 'BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI' using the sample implementation and populated the approvers.
    2. I activated events SAVED,CHANGEVERSIONSAVED for WS14000148 in OOCU transaction.
    3. I see event linkages for WS14000148 for both events SAVED,CHANGEVERSIONSAVED in SWE2 transaction.
    4. I assigned role SAP_EC_BBP_PURCHASER to for subworkflow N step for contract WS14000147.
        ( User who is creating contract has this role)
    5. Consistency check for WS14000148 is green and WS14000147 is yellow in SWUD
    6. Event simulation for BUS2000113 and events SAVED,CHANGEVERSIONSAVED shows WS14000148 successfully started.
    I see dump in ST22 with errors TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED and SYSTEM_NO_SHM_MEMORY with WF-BATCH is this any thing to do with that?
    If any one know what are the steps I am missing please let me know.
    Thanks
    A S

    Hi
    Please refer to these OSS notes which might help.
    <u>Refer to following OSS Notes -></u>
    Note 735026 - Memory problems at BBP_GETLIST_INDEX_FILL
    Note 932836 - BBP_GETLIST_INDEX_FILL: Activation not possible
    879528 WS14000148: Send mail to initiator incorrect
    901200 WS14000148 dia wrk item despite NO_FURTHER_APPROVAL_NEEDED=X
    879873 BUS2000113: The Object_ID attribute may be empty
    903015 BAdI Workflows: Events and parallel steps
    901068 BAdI Workflows: Enhancement of Note 896556
    769458 Dynamic workflows: No adjustment after document change
    972757 Occurence of the SYSTEM_NO_SHM_MEMORY runtime error
    741864 FinBasis: Termination TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED
    864473 Deactivating the shared memory when searching by prefix
    928642 Container factory: Shared memory dump update
    Refer to these links.
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/2c/e68d406b305537e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/26/0f8b41ed891609e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/6b/eca441eea7ef0be10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/f7/a6a3415e34b05fe10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/6b/eca441eea7ef0be10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    </b>
    <u>Also raise an OSS message with SAP as well.</u>
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Set up Company Codes for Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable

    HI,
    I need clarification on "Set up Company Codes for Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable"
    When a company code "ABCD" isn't set up for contract accounts receivable and payable (Menu path:
    SAP Insurance -> Collections/Disbursements -> Organizational Units -> Set up Company Codes for Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable), are postings on this company code "ABCD" within FS-CD not allowed and blocked ?
    Is it mandetory to specify company codes to post in Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable in SAP FS-CD.

    Yes .  It is mandatory to extend company code chart of accounts to CA/CR and FSCD.
    Srinivas

  • Balance outstanding for contracts

    Hi,
    For contracts or sales order, does anyone know if there is a report that will show the orginal quantity and balance outstanding?
    For single contract, I can use VA43 to click the "status overview" button to get it. Now I need a report to show all.
    Many Thanks
    Jean

    dear chang,
    you are right at your hand that open qty = order qty - refernced quantity in subsequence document.
    But i was thinking that you are asking open qty for a document(like only for a sales order open item) in that case open qty will be calculated as per my formula open qty = order qty - confirmed qty in the same document.
    FYI
    Reagrds
    hiamnshu

  • Late Archiving for Contract Documents via OAWD.

    Hi experts,
    I am now configuring Late Archiving for Contract Documents but it seems that the document attachment cannot be viewed via J6NP/J6NY. My question is concerning the Business Object. When I use standard Business Object "BUS2095", documents are stored succesfully and documents can be viewed in J6NP/J6NY. But I cannot use BUS2095 because it only has Sales Document No as input. My users require fields - Sales Document No, Contract Start Date,Sales Organisation and Distribution Channel. Therefore I created a customized Business Object with those fields.These fields were taken from a new Customised Joint table between VBAK,VEDA and VBAP.
    At OAWD, I am able to archive for the Document Type I created. It says that Document stored succesfully. But the problem is when I want to view the archive document at J6NP/J6NY, there is no attachments. I tested the J6NP configuration with BUS2095 and attachment can be viewed. But with my Customised Business Object, there are no attachments.
    What must I look into and what do I need to check? I really need help here. Please..

    Hello,
    Can you check the configuration of OAC3?
    Hope you have deleted the configuration of BUS2095 assignment to document type.
    Instead, creation of new archivelink configuration for custom business object and assign to document type you have used earlier.
    -Thank,
    Ajay

Maybe you are looking for