Pc users not seeing attachments

when I send mail to pc users, some see my attachments and others don't - how can I make Mail more compatible?
Mail Version 3.2 (919/919.2)
thanks

You do realize that people may not see all of that fancy formatting you've added if they choose only to receive plain text messages?
By the way, Mail is compatible (except for the part they re-wrote to comply with Outlook). It is usually the PC's mail program (likely Outlook) that is not compatible. Outlook is very much not standards compliant. It's just Microsoft compliant, as with much of their software.

Similar Messages

HT1918 Hello! Staff of E4 Group JSC use Apple devices for call, reading email and calendars. When the user open event in calendar of iPhone or iPad, he does not see attachments (picture №1, picture №2). But it is possible on Blackberry (picture №3).

Hello!
Staff of E4 Group JSC use Apple devices for call, reading email and calendars. When the user open event in calendar of iPhone or iPad, he does not see attachments (picture №1, picture №2). But it is possible on Blackberry (picture №3). How user of Apple can see these attachments? Recommend please any apps for it.

Hello!
Staff of E4 Group JSC use Apple devices for call, reading email and calendars. When the user open event in calendar of iPhone or iPad, he does not see attachments (picture №1, picture №2). But it is possible on Blackberry (picture №3). How user of Apple can see these attachments? Recommend please any apps for it.

Lion-Windows users cannot see attachments

I just upgraded to Lion, and now some Windows users cannot see/find attachments. I did all that was advised (clicking on the "Windows user friendly" list), but to no avail. I sent to several Windows users and no one can see attachments with the new Mail program. Also, one of the most important icons in the Mail toolbar ("Add Attachment") seems to be missing. This sometimes helped in previous Mail versions when sending to PCs, but I cannot locate it in Lion. Looks like I will have to use Microsoft Office Outlook for email. This is too bad, as I like the other features the new Apple Mail program has, but must use a trustworhty email program.

Scott,
The issue is one I am chasing, and is due to Lion's change to not send Plain Text (apparently). Although changed in the Compose window, when reviewed, it will have been sent with HTML, anyway.
While the actual problem is with MS and Outlook or Outlook Express, the work around once was to use the command to Make Plain Text before sending.
Ernie

User not seeing requisitions

Hi, SAP Gurus,
The user says that they have not received any requisitions for approval in Batch Administration in quite awhile. I was getting several daily. Haventu2019t seen any in a week or two
Everything looks perfectly alright on the configuration side and also the status tab of the PR says release possible. So since they are not getting the PR's, they are going and manually processing them in ME55. Please help me, why is it that the user not getting any PR's
Thanks
Anusha

you can check in SWI1 transaction.
First find your work item.
Then select it and click display work item
beeing there click button LOG
In next screen you should see a button for agent
if you click this one, then you will see who got the mail

Windows users not seeing my attachments, and other issues

After being an Entourage users for years, I finally switched to Mail/Address Book/iCal/.mac combo when Leopard came out. After using Mail for a few weeks, I have some questions:
1. In Entourage, I could paste an image from the Clipboard (say, a screenshot via Command-Shift-Control-4) into a message, and everyone could see it. When I do that now, none of my Windows friends can see the image. All they get is a blank box with a red x in it. What are the methods in Mail that work for sending attachments?
2. If I get an email from someone, I want to know if they're already in my Address Book. Is there a way to do that? If I right-click on the person's email address, a drop down says "Add to..." and it will add them, even if they're already in my Address Book, which leads to duplicates and even triplicates. I find myself duplicating contacts virtually every day. In Entourage, if you clicked "Add to Address Book" and it that person was already in the Address book, it would toss up a window, saying that this address was already in there, do you want to view it, or add to existing contact.
3. No categories. If I get an email from someone that treats me with familiarity, but I don't recognize them, there's no way to go into my address book and tell what relationship I have with that contact. Client? Acquaintence? Purchaser? Relative I only met once 6 years ago? This is because there seems to be no way to attach a category to each contact. Once you have over 2000 contacts, it becomes difficult to remember what each one is there for. Did they purchase a product on my site? Or are they a vendor? Someone I met at a party? There is the Mail Group function, but those act more like Smart folders. But those groups aren't attached to the actual contact, so when viewing the All Contacts, there's no way of telling who's who. Even if there were simply a way to color each contact, those colors could act as a category, and one could sort by them. This is my major concern right now with Mail over Entourage. Any ideas on how you are handling this?
4. There doesn't seem to be any way to grab the entire mailing address in one Copy. You can highlight/copy the address, street and zip, and paste that into, for instance, a Dymo label, but you have to go back and grab the name separately. Any way to completely grab the mailing contact information?
5. If I search for, say, "Comcast" in the Address Book, I logically get all of the contacts that have "comcast.com" in their email address. But there should be a way where it gives precedent to the actual Comcast company contact, instead of having to scroll through hundreds of contacts to find the actual company. I'm finding this for many companies that happen to also have their name in the Notes section of many contacts. I guess I don't have a question on this point, just pointing out something.
Thanks for any tips.

It would help us help you if you posted the URL to the html file that holds the QuickTime file.
A QT MPEG-4 file should be viewable on a Mac or PC running QuickTime version 6, or higher. A 36 minute movie that is not set to "fast start" would require the entire file be downloaded prior to playback and that would take a few hours over my pitiful Texas dial-up connection.

Some users not seeing all of a web form in Smart View Excel 11.1.2?

I am on Planning 11.1.2 and I have an end user who, when he opens a web form in Excel using Smart View, he only sees about 1/3 of the entire form. If in the Oracle/Planning web, the form is fine. When he uses my machine, he sees the entire web form in Smart View Excel. Is there a setting on his Excel I need to change?
Thanks.

It's a limitation, if you will, of the way JDeveloper works. It essentially runs your JSF page in order to get the rendering. At design time, the phase listener is obviously messing things up since you're not in a proper secured environment - hence the workaround to bypass your phase listener at design time.

Can not see attachments on the Email

The overview screen shows that there is an attachment but when you select the message the attachment does not show up, this is happening when messages are forwarded. At times when there is a pdf attachment (not a forwarded message) what opens up is the media player. Some pdf attachments have no problems of opening.
The N900 needs to become a serious phone, this needs to be fixed.
This does not happen on my N97 !
Any solutions ?

This just happened to me. After a bit of messing about I decided to forward the message back to my own e-mail address.
Again the email attachment was shown in the overview screen but not in the main email, however, the attachment was now available from the sent items folder.
Not a fix or solution, more of a bodge!!!
Hope it helps

PC users cannot see attachments. Why?

When sending attachments to PC users, I get a lot of people saying that nothing was attached. I end up having to zip everything for PC users.
Does anybody know what I'm doing wrong?
thanks

Try sending Plain Text emails.
Format -> Make Plain Text
Regards
TD

I want my upgrade of firefox to be transparent to users, do not want users to see the "Firefox Updated" tab/page.

Hi, we are upgrading our users' firefox thru batch/policies. We would like it to be as transparent to them, i.e, users not seeing the "Firefox Updated" tab/page. Is there a setting or command that can be done to achieve this? Thanks in advance.

Maybe:
* https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Setting_up_an_update_server

Project Lite users cannot see Project link on Office365 toolbar

Our Project Lite users do not see the PROJECT link in the Office365 toolbar.
All other roles can see the link - these have either Project Online subscription or Project Pro for Project Online subscription.
I have verified the following:
These users have Project Lite and SharePoint online licenses assigned in the Office365 portal - user license area
We are using Project Server permissions mode - with a custom Team Members group - that maps to the OOB Team Members group and My Task category permissions. There are no custom category permissions set on the Resource- only custom Team group
membership
We even shared the PWA site with the members (Team Members for Project Web App)
We are using ADSynch to synch users to the custom Team Members group via an O365 group.
We are using the default \PWA - it is the only instance of PWA in the Office365 environment (E3 subscription
These users can access the PWA by entering the URL in their browser - they just cannot see the Project link on the 0365 menu bar.
Note: The Office365 SharePoint online administrators have created a custom master page - but the PROJECT menu item is rendering for non-Project Lite licensees.
Any ideas on the cause or how to get Project Lite users to see the PROJECT link on the O365 toolbar?
LB

Hello,
Please can you confirm they are using the correct URL?
It should be along the lines of https://<Company_Name>.sharepoint.com/sites/pwa/
I ask you to check this as I have seen previously users not seeing the Project link when using a different URL.

Final user's can not see the data due to limited authorization.

We have created a InfoSet with three info Objects, 0Account, 0Costcenter and 0COMP_CODE. 0Costcenter have an attribute retail location 0RT_LOCATIO.
0RT_LOCATIO is an authorization relevant object. We as consultants can execute the infoset properly, but final user's with limited authorizations can not see the data because of authorization failier
We hae several options to solve the issue, deleselect the auth. flag in the infoobject; delete the infoobject from the attributes of the cost center or create an authorization object and assign it to the final user's profile. But we don't want to go that way.
My question is, is there any way to avoid including this attribute in the infoset definition? We are not using it in the query and we don't need it, so if we could delete it from the infoset (in the same way you add or delete infoobjects from an Infocube) without changing the cost center aster data, we will have our problem solved.
Does anyone how to do this (if possible)?
Thanks in advance!

Just do two things to find the authorization check failed for that user.
1. Execute SU53 output and find out the authoirzation check failed. If yes, please send that to BASIS Team.
2. Next one, switch on the authorization trace in ST01 and ask that user to see that data. if the user is failed with authorization issue. switch off the trace in ST01 and find out the issue.
Do this way, if it is not successful you can go for any other alternate way.
Hope this would help you.

Other user can not see the data from the workbook

Hi Friends,
I created a workbook with some worksheets in a Business area. The owner of the workbook has no problem to view all the worksheets and get all the data returned.. I granted all the neccessary privileges to other users ,they could see the workbook, but no data returnd for the query results. Tried refresh the worksheet, same no data retrieved.Checked the SQL inspector and the plan, it showed the correct paths and execution plan without any errors there. The same query run in SQL plus by other users returned data correctly.
By the way, I had a summary folder in the workbook. During the troubleshooting, I dropped this summary folder, still the same no data return for other users.
Any body happen to know the cause or has some ideas on this issue?
The discoverer administrator verson is 9.0.4.00 and the PLUS /Viewer is 9.04.45.02.
Thank you very much,
J.K

Hi All
The scheduling of reports, as you have probably noticed, requires that the scheduling privilege within Discoverer Administrator tool be granted to the user NOT to a role. Scheduling will not work if you attempt this. The reason for this is that these two SYS grants must go to a user:
GRANT SELECT ON SYS.V_$PARAMETER
GRANT EXECUTE ON SYS.DBMS_JOB
The user will also need to have these grants:
CREATE PROCEDURE,
CREATE TABLE,
CREATE VIEW,
EXECUTE ANY PROCEDURE,
UNLIMITED TABLESPACE on user's tablespace
My new Discoverer 10g Handbook, which I would recommend to anyone working with Discoverer, explains scheduling in detail and even tells you how the tables and views that are used to store the results work. You won't find this information anywhere else, as you will see if you read some of the five reviews that have been left on Amazon.com. For more information about the book please look here:
http://learndiscoverer.com/books/books.htm
The PUBLIC grants are not having any impact. All these do is ensure that ALL users have the same basic privileges. You can just as easily grant these to any role of your choosing and it will work just fine.
By the way, because the PUBLIC role is the MINIMUM privileges that a user can have you might want to consider reducing the end user Discoverer privileges afforded to PUBLIC. By default, all users can Create and Edit workbooks, share workbooks, save workbooks and so on. This is far too rich a set of privileges for the basic user, who in most cases will be a VIEWER user. Whenever I create a new EUL I always recommend that my client reduces the PUBLIC user's privileges and then create new roles for more advanced VIEWER and PLUS users, adding privileges as required.
Thus, my basic VIEWER, aka PUBLIC, has only these privileges:
Collect Query Statistics
Item Drill
Drill Out
My advanced VIEWER has this additional privilege:
Save Workbooks to Database
My basic PLUS user has all of the above, plus these (pardon the pun):
Create/Edit Query
Create Link
and my advanced PLUS users get everything, which means they now get these as well:
Grant Workbook
Schedule Workbooks
I also remove the Save / Save As Actions link from Viewer which prevents the basic VIEWER users from knowing that it is there. In essence, because these users no longer can click the Save link and because they do not have the Save to Database privilege, they will not be prompted to save within Viewer no matter what they do. This now makes 10.1.2 Viewer work the same way as previous versions.
Even though the Save link is not there, my advanced Viewer users will be prompted to save if they have made any changes. This therefore allows you to have two classes of Viewer, one who can save and one that cannot.
I hope this helps
Regards
Micahael Armstrong-Smith

Except sadmin other users not able to see siebel BI publisher reports

Hi,
we have integrated siebel with BI publisher, except sadmin other users not able to see BI publisher reports, it is throwing error "No file has been attached to this record, please attach a file. SBL-SVC-00155".
when login with sadmin report is generating. we have created user sadmin on BI publisher. if we change that user sadmin on BI publisher to some other name, then sadmin not able to generate reports. is there any specific on user creation on BIP should match with siebel?
Thanks,
Joe

i suggest then dropping user and re-creating and then re-assigning permission (just keep his webcat files) - it'll be faster than looking into individual permissions
another possible option - did you check his browser? sometimes the screen resolution can be too low and they don't see it on the same screen - need to scroll.
is it possible he's not using the same Dashboard page as others? just check the "Report Links" to make sure
i'm not sure what else could be a cause of this

Assign Task is assigned to a specific user but the she can not see it in her ToDo list

Hello,
I am currently working on the first process (after upgraded it to LC ES 2 with SP2) and try to test by routing it to the next person but the user could not see it in her ToDo list nor receive any Task email.
I checked for the process in the AdminUI and see that it is currently assign to that user and also check the email configuration but do not see any thing wrong. I also recorded it and see it is assign to that person. I then try to re-assign it to a different person but it still does not show in the next person's ToDo list. So I go to the log file and see there is an error as below:
00000078 UserServiceIm W com.adobe.idp.taskmanager.dsc.userservicev2.UserServiceImpl createTaskFromDialogProperties WARNING!!! You have not specified any Form TLO/DCI settings, and have not specified any input data. This task will be created without any form.Process: 1515F/1515F, Step Name: AssignTask0
I tried to search for the error above but could not find any thing reference to it.
Can any one please advise on how to fix it so the user can see it in their ToDo list when the task is assigned to them.
Thanks,
Han Dao

Hi
It sounds like you have not selected anything on the Presentation & Data tab of the Workspace Startpoint/User Service.
You need to specify:
Your Asset (the form you want to present to the user)
An associated Action Profile (tells the server how you want the form rendered...typically it is set to Default which uses the Render PDF Form process)
The variable to hold your data(typically an xml variable)
Make sure these are set.
Diana

User can see all resources, not only Permitted for his/her Organization

Hi,
I have set three self-serviceable resources as Permitted Resources for a specific organization. So if I click on Permitted Resources for that organization I can see only those three...
When an user of that organization clicks on Request New Resources, all self-serviceable resources are listed to the user, not only the Permitted Resources. I thought the user could see only the permitted resources...
If I log as sys admin and Request Resources for an user of this organization, I can see only the three permitted resources.
I saw the sql statement that OIM run to list the resources:
select
obj.obj_key,obj_name,obj.sdk_key,sdk_name, obj_order_for,obj_auto_prepop, obj_type,
obj_allow_multiple, obj_self_request_allowed,obj_autosave,obj_allowall,
obj_rowver, obj_note,obj_autolaunch
from obj obj
left outer join sdk sdk on obj.sdk_key = sdk.sdk_key
where obj.obj_key in
select distinct obj.obj_key from obj obj
left outer join sdk sdk on obj.sdk_key = sdk.sdk_key
left outer join acp acp on obj.obj_key = acp.obj_key
left outer join oba oba on obj.obj_key = oba.obj_key
where
obj.obj_self_request_allowed='1' or obj.obj_key in
select obj_key from acp where act_key in
select act_key
from usr
where usr_key= 5 and acp_self_servicable = '1'
) and
obj.obj_order_for = 'U' and
(obj.obj_type='Application' or obj.obj_type='Generic') and
obj.obj_key not in
select pop.obj_key
from pop pop, pol pol, pog pog, ugp ugp, usg usg
where
pop.pol_key=pol.pol_key and
pol.pol_key=pog.pol_key and
pog.ugp_key=ugp.ugp_key and
ugp.ugp_key=usg.ugp_key and
usg.usr_key in (5) and
pop.pop_denial='1'
) and
obj.obj_key not in (
select distinct obj.obj_key
from obj obj, obi obi, ost ost, oiu oiu
left outer join orc orc on oiu.orc_key=orc.orc_key
where
oiu.obi_key=obi.obi_key and
oiu.ost_key=ost.ost_key and
upper(ost.ost_status) <> 'REVOKED' and
obi.obj_key=obj.obj_key and
oiu.usr_key in (5) and
obj.obj_allow_multiple='0'
) and
obj.obj_key in
select distinct obj_key
from pkg
where pkg_type='Provisioning'
As you can see in the query above, if I change the snippet below the result is what I expect.
obj.obj_self_request_allowed='1' AND obj.obj_key in
Did I miss to set something or doing something wrong?
Thanks,
Renato.

Sorry, but I do not understand your last reply. You mentioned the following:
for option B, even when option A is unchecked, you can set self-request only for a specific organization when assign permitted resources.
Isnt this what you wanted? You should set the resource as permitted resources in all the organizations whose users can request that resource. I have implemented this and it works just fine. It works for both types of requests. a) My resources -> request new resources and b) Requests -> Resources -> Grant resources.
In case of b, depending on the organization to which the selected user belongs, the Resource is displayed. all resources are not displayed.
So the solution is to uncheck in RO and put the resource under specific organizations permitted resources and make it self-requestable. It should work fine. Let me know your exact issue if it does not work this way.

Pc users not seeing attachments

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for