Pegging Method in EDD plan

Hi experts,
Which pegging method is best for constrain based ASCP using EDD plan.
Ramesh

Hi,
Thanks for valuable feedback.
Is there nay note which can explain us the detailed scheduling process.
currently we are using standard pegging method but we are facing scheduling issue. system getting overloaded on same day whereas we have sufficient resources available in previous days.

Similar Messages

  • How to prevent for a particular org manually created IR/ISO should not be considered for Constrained EDD plans

    We have a situation that around IRs with ~500 parts which manually created in Org A and ISO Created in Org B and ISO picked as well. But due to some reasons, shipment will get delay for 1 month and till that time plan should not be considered this IR' as supply in Org A.
    Currently our Constrained EDD plan is considering this IR quantities as supply for the Org A demands and not generating any Planned orders. Seems we don't option to firm IRs by changing the need by date after 1 month. Also its not respect the need by date of IR and its getting reschedule in action and pegged to the current Demand in Org A. Please advise if you have any thoughts.

    We have a situation that around IRs with ~500 parts which manually created in Org A and ISO Created in Org B and ISO picked as well. But due to some reasons, shipment will get delay for 1 month and till that time plan should not be considered this IR' as supply in Org A.
    Currently our Constrained EDD plan is considering this IR quantities as supply for the Org A demands and not generating any Planned orders. Seems we don't option to firm IRs by changing the need by date after 1 month. Also its not respect the need by date of IR and its getting reschedule in action and pegged to the current Demand in Org A. Please advise if you have any thoughts.

  • Planning method/Basic and Planning method/forecast field values are grey

    Hi Experts
    The Planning method/Basic and Planning method/forecast field values are grey in my project profile.
    What customization would influence for this setting. I wish to change from 2 to 4. Please advise the solution/
    warm regards
    ramSiva

    You can change the above field values only from WBS scheduling profile. If you want to change them, choose 'free scheduling' method.
    Regards,
    Mahendra

  • EDD Plan issues

    Hi All,
    We are evaluating running EDD plan. Primarily we are trying to enforce selection of Alternate BOM / Routing due to Purchasing lead time.
    In short, if the any of the purchase item in the BOM is cannot be procured then plan should select alternate BOM/Routing.
    This is successfully tested and accepted by the business.
    However business identified multiple issues with plan -
    1: Plan is rescheduling out work order and suggest planned order. for example: - Existing work order is rescheduled out to day 45 and planned orders are suggested on day 40, 42.
    Plan should use existing work order before suggesting planned orders.
    2: Planned orders are suggested way late in horizon. For example: - total lead time of item ( This included purchasing lead time of components) is 92 days. But planned orders are suggested from day 119 onwards.
    Did anyone face these issues and know how can we handle these issues? Appreciate the points on the resolution of the issues.
    The version is 12.1.1
    Regards

    It is 14 days not 30 days.
    Check your online MY Verizon account and see if anything was changed.
    Good Luck

  • Is there any methods upload shift plan by personal number?

    In SAP,with T-CODE pp61 we only can maintain shift plan with org unit.Is there any method to batch input shift plan per. employee?thank in advance!!!

    Hi,
    Shift Planning is completely Object ddriven from OM sidea and all the shift are stored in the substitutions infotypes 2003,
    This is much better to use batch data thru this screen rather than maintaininig in infotype 2003. Becasue when you maintain it via 2003 it has lot of fields and cumbsesome.
    Hope i am helpful.
    Regards
    Srikanth

  • What pegging logic is used in ASCP 12.1 DRP plans?

    Hi, could you help me to understand the folowing issue.
    We are implementing ASCP 12.1 DRP planning and have issue with pegging - it's seemd to be done in random order. We need supplies are pegged to demands on day-by-day basis or "standard pegging" (select first supply peg to some demands in ascending order, then next supply peg to unpegged demands in ascending order, and so on). Peggind window for demands and supplies must be = 1 day, in supply windows supplies must be sorted by type before pegging (oh, firm, non-firm).
    For example, see plan output:
    Supply lines:
    Org Item Order Type Sug Due Date Qty
    1. Org1 item10 Purchase requisition 10.10.09 6
    Pegging (Date/Qty): 10.10.09/1, 11.10.09/1, 12.10.09/2, 13.10.09/2
    2. Org1 item10 Planned order 20.10.09 40
    Pegging (Date/Qty): 19.10.09/2, 22.10.09/1, 23.10.09/2, 24.10.09/2, 25.10.09/1, 26.10.09/2, *14.11.09/2, 15.11.09/1, 17.11.09/2* ...
    As mentioned in ASCP UG, there is folowing pegging methods:
    1. FiFO
    2. Standart
    3. Priority
    4. Priority|Standart
    My profile setting is:
    MSC: Use FIFO Pegging = No
    MSO: Supply Window Size =1
    MSO: Demand Window Size = 1
    DRP plan has no options to switch pegging mode (while MDS/MPP/MRP has ones), so i could not guess witch mode DRP planning use and how to control it's logic.

    Hi
    ASCP Pegging Logic do not apply in DPP
    in DPP The logic is allocation and you Control it with several Parameters:
    Allocation Bucket (Daily, Weekly and Period )
    Demand Priority Rule (different from ASCP)
    Fare Share allocation Rules
    Example Scenario:
    Allocation Bucket (Period for example )
    Demand Priority Rule:
    Sales Order Major (Demand Class)
    Sales Regular
    Forecast
    Within The allocation Bucket earliest supply will allocate Sales Order Majors (sorting By date)
    Regards
    Shlomi

  • Pegging between SNP orders?

    Is there pegging relationships between SNP orders? If it's so, what are the differences between pegging of SNP and PP/DS orders.
    Thanks

    Hi Mikalai,
    SNP has 3 solvers for rough-cut capacity planning i.e. Heuristics, Capability-To-Match and Optimizer. Heuristics and Optimizer are time-series based solvers and pegging is not supported using these solvers. The only solver that is order-based is CTM and with CTM pegging is possible. Even though CTM is different from rest of the SNP, it is often gets clubbed with SNP functionality.
    SNP can only schedule to a minimum of one day granularity and where as PP/DS can schedule to second. As far as pegging methods are concerned, fixed & dynamic pegging are available for both CTM & PP/DS.
    Hope this helps.

  • Constrained Planning Question

    Hi All,
    We are running Unconstrained Planning right now. We need to run the ASCP EDD plan with following MUST Constraints -
    Lead Time for ONLY Purchased Items
    Aggregated Supplier Capacity.
    To provide more details on this, assume following -
    END_ITEM -
                        Mfg LT = 4 Days
    PURCHASED_ITEM
                           Processing LT = 15 days
    Now if the Sales Order comes on 16th Day then ASCP should compress the Mfg LT of END_ITEM and fulfill the order. But a Sales Order comes on 12th day the the order should be fulfilled on 16th day respecting the Purchased Item Lead Time. ( Assuming : - Purchased Item is not available and it needs to be purchased for this sales order) but violating the Mfg LT of END_ITEM.
    As per my understanding this is not possible to achieve in EDD plan. Currently we have PTF = Total LT for Purchased Item and that helps us in Unconstrained Plan.
    But In EDD plan, I need to setup MSO:Lead Time Control = Do Not Violate .... so that it respects the PTF.  But with this setup the Mfg LT will also be respected and the SO will be pushed out.
    If I set MSO:Lead Time Control = Violate Min Processing LT, then both Purchasing LT and Mfg LT are subject to compression.
    Note: - it is not viable to remove Mfg LT of the END_ITEM as it is important to align the requirement of PURCHASED_ITEM in future. Without Mfg LT of 4 days we are putting all the purchased item receiving at risk which is totally unacceptable.
    Please confirm on this. Also please let me know any workaround to this.
    Second issue is about the Supplier Capacity. We have an agreement with supplier at aggregate level. For example, 800 units a day and supplier is supplying us almost 30 different active parts. Current there is no way we can specify aggregate level Supplier Capacity in ASCP so that it restrict the total supply of these 30 parts to 800 per day.
    I had to calculate the consumption % for each part and setup at Supplier - Item level. With the supplier capacity accumulation, eventually this will be achieved. But we have to setup capacity at Supplier - Item level.
    Can someone please confirm my understanding? Also please let me know any workaround.
    Thanks for input.

    I'm no Swing expert, but here is what I think.
    Most of the methods of PropertyChangeSupport, like the one you invoke:
    fireIndexedPropertyChange(String propertyName, int index,
        Object oldValue,  Object newValue)Are, according to the documentation:
    +...merely a convenience wrapper around the more general firePropertyChange method that takes PropertyChangeEvent value.+
    So instead of invoking the previous method you could have invoked:
    firePropertyChange(new IndexedPropertyChangeEvent(...))In the same way, it would be nice if VetoableChangeSupport had a method:
    fireIndexedVetoableChange(String propertyName, int index,
        Object oldValue, Object newValue) throws PropertyVetoExceptionbut it doesn't. So why not just fill in the pattern and invoke:
    fireVetoableChange(new IndexedPropertyChangeEvent(...))

  • How to change characteristics values in PPDS planned order?

    Hi,
    I have few PPDS planned orders. I want to change the value of few characteristics of existing PPDS planned order.
    How can I do the same?
    Any standard T.Code or function module or report available to update the characteristics values of PPDS planned order in APO.
    Thanks in advance.
    Warm Regards,
    Surajit Das

    Hi Surajit,
    Char can be changed programatically.
    If you want to change the Planned Order characteritics before its creation, you can do so at the time Planning run itself (/SAPAPO/RRP3) in BADI /SAPAPO/RRP_SRC_EXIT, Method RRP_USEX_PLORD_CREATE.
    Planned Order characteritics can be changed after it creation.using BAPI BAPI_MOSRVAPS_SAVEMULTI3.

  • How to confine various level of planning in to limited and lowest level of planning in DP by the users

    Hi Gurus,
    May I know the various methods to confine planning level at the lowest level and re-define the Primitive methods where  business currently uses in excel sheet and plans at all level into demand planning with a minimum and lowest level by which the business reduces manual work and increases visibility and planning.
    Example: Business currently plans at customer Hierarchies  which has about 6 levels, product has Hierarchies at 5 levels, location hierarchies at 3 level in excel sheet and on monthly level for an year and then quarterly for 2 years and yearly basis  for one year. This we need to confine to lowest level of customer, product and location.
    HEIRARCHY LEVEL
    PRODUCT
    CUSTOMER
    LOCATION
    LEVEL
    P0
    C0
    L0
    HIGHEST
    1
    P1
    C1
    L1
    2
    P2
    C2
    L2
    3
    P3
    C3
    L3
    4
    P4
    C4
    SOLD-TO
    5
    P5
    C5
    6
    P6
    CUSTOMER
    LOWEST
    SKU
    PLANNING LEVEL
    PRODUCT
    CUSTOMER
    LOCATION(DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL)
    HEIRARCHY LEVEL
    P6
    C5
    L3
    LOWEST LEVEL
    WHERE
    P6
    SKU
    C5
    CUSTOMER
    L3
    SOLD-TO- PARTY
    CVC
    P6_C5_L3
    So in this case, the cvc are created at lowest level of planning, at P6_C5_L3.
    Now how to convenience the business that they need to do the planning at this level for planning, as the rest levels will be aggregated automatically in demand planning.
    Is the grouping level place a major role? if so how to do that as the business says for some products they do at p4_c2_L1 level for some they do at P5_C4_L2 level.
    Could someone guide us in giving some solution which ease the business need of planning at any level. Hope you have understood my requirement by the above example. If not do let me know, so that I may try to inform by further details. Thanks in advance.
    Praveen

    Praveen,
    Not really sure what the question is.  You say you want to 'confine' planning to the most detailed level, but you also want to support planning at an intermediate level.
    No matter.  DP transparently supports planning at any/all levels simultaneously.  Data in DP is always stored at the detail level, no matter which level (or combination of levels) the forecast is entered at.
    Creation of the Demand Forecast - SAP Library
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • What are the ways to Copy Firm Planned Order from one ASCP Plan to another?

    We run two EDD Plans with very similar options, but with different plan horizons.
    To have the suggestions synchronized, we need to copy the "Firm Planned Orders" from one plan to another.
    We tried inserting the records in MSC_ST_SUPPLIES with Order type 5 and firm planned type 1 with appropriate plan id, but Planning ODS Load is not considering those inserted records.
    We don't want to insert directly into MSC_SUPPLIES.
    Any inputs is appreciated.
    Thanks
    Sundar

    You can also call a custom DTSX package in SSIS via the datamanager.
    there are at least 5 ways of transfering data in BPC between apps.
    1. Through the front end (excel etc) via evdre/evsnds
    2. Through Script logic using *Dest App
    3. Using BPC's standard export dtsx package via DM
    4. Using SSIS using BPC's custom SSIS tasks
    5. Through Script logic using stored procs.
    i am sure people will come up with more.
    remember if you use ssis and move data into any table but the wb, you need to process the cube afterwards.

  • Three-Way Pegging

    Please explain me what is Three-Way Pegging ?

    Three-Way Pegging is used to plan and schedule bulk shipments based on supply and demand information. The term three-way refers to demand items (stock requirements or customer requests), supply avails (what is produced, purchased, or in stock), and transportation avails (vehicles, vessels, or pipelines available to complete the shipment).
    The term pegging refers to the matching of demand items to supply avails and transportation avails for the purpose of scheduling of bulk shipments, such as marine voyages or pipeline batches. You plan and schedule bulk shipments, by assigning the pegged items to the Distribution Schedule in Three-Way Pegging. From the  Distribution Schedule you can create carrier nominations, as well as continuously update the schedule.

  • Extra planned orders generated though there are sufficient Purchase orders

    Hi
    For a component material system is generating extra planned orders though there are sufficient purchase orders to meet the requirement.
    When i check the pegged requirements for the planned order it gives a message Order xxxxxx(purchase order) possibly contains recursive BOM components
    There is no recursiveness defined in the system.
    Below are the MRP settings for this component.
    MRP type: PD
    Lot Size: EX(lot to lot) min lot size is XXKG
    Availability check --- 02 (individual requirements)
    Please help me in understanding the reason

    Hi,
    First thing is BOM Where used lst.
    Check this component in which are all the BOMs it exists..
    If it is showing the BOM for the same matrial?
    Check the BOM of the same material..
    Regards,
    Siva

  • Planned Order

    Hi Experts,
    I am using one production line for 3 products in REM. If there are requirements for all 3 products in same periods, after MRP run I find planned order for all products assigned to production on same date in planning table with capacity requirement more than 200%. Is there any automatic method to distribute planned order based on capacty available to avoid overload on same date.I mean system should find the period where the capacity is available and distribute the planned order accordingly.
    Can somebody give solution for this?
    Thanks
    Mil

    Hi,
    Automatic capacity distribution over the period is not available in standard SAP.
    Regards,
    Dharma

  • Supplier Processing Lead Time with ASCP Unconstrained Plan

    Hi All,
    Is it possible for unconstrained plan to consider supplier lead time constrained which we define in ASL?
    I have defined an Unconstrained Plan & the plan is not considering Item Level , ASL Lead times & generating the planned Orders to meet demand due dates by compressing the Lead time.
    Constraint option is not checked in plan options.
    Appreciate your advise on this issue.
    Regards,
    Pranay Saxena

    Hi Pranay,
    An unconstrained plan cannot have ANY constraint.
    So it is not possible to have just the supplier lead time as constrained.
    Alternatively, if that is what is your requirement, you may run a constrained EDD plan with just the material constraints enabled and the "Enforce Purchasing Lead Time" Flag checked.
    If the supplier capacity is NOT set.. it will be treated like infinite..
    This way you will force the engine to respect the lead times from ASL and acheive a near unconstrained plan.
    Another alternative is use constrained plan as explained above and set the profile MSO: Lead Time Control to Do not Violate Minimum processing LT... in this case even the processing LTs for the MAKE items are also respected.
    Hope that helps.
    Regards,
    Mohan Balaji
    NOTE: Please mark the post as Helpful or Answered if the update has really helped you. This would also bring the thread to logical conclusion and will be helpful for the viewers.

Maybe you are looking for