Permits based on classification.

HI PM Gurus,
I am new to SAP PM Module.
I am not able to determine permits based on classification in maintenance oder automatically. Can anyone guide me step by step process to do it. I have created characteristic as PM-order type and i have assigned table as : CSEVPERMIT and field as AUART in additional tab of characteristic, but still i am not getting this permit in order.
Please guide.
Thanks in advance.
Kailash

Hi,
The permits are automatically getting assigned based on order type bcoz .. the characteristic mentioned in permit is a reference characteristic which checks the sturcuture -CSEVPERMIT, Field :- AUART -order type , in value of characteristic - if it is given as PM01 then when PM01 Order type is created this permit gets assigned , similarly if u give PM02 , When this order type is created - that respective permit has PM02 as its classification -characteristic value gets assigned ..thus in this way permits get automatically assigned based on its classification value .., similarly for assigned based on planned costs, actual costs, maintenance activity type .., in IPMD if u put Order release option as 02 -> Must be issued else error message then u have to issue the permit before relese of that order , similarly u have option for doing it mandatory for TECO also ..
From SAP Help:-
Permits can be :
Calculated automatically by the system using class selection and then assigned
For this, the permits in your system must:
Belong to a permit group, to which a class of class type 049 has been assigned
Have been classified using the class characteristics
These characteristics must have been assigned for this using the additional data for structure CSEVPERMIT.
The system automatically determines these permits. It compares the order data with the characteristic features of the classified permits available in the system. Permits, for which the data matches, are assigned automatically to the order.
regards
pushpa

Similar Messages

PO release based on Classification

Dear Experts,
Hi experts,
Our team has configured PO release procedure, in that they used Order type(BSART) and Material Group (MATKL) as the characteristics for the Class that is used for that group. FYI in the system there is only one Release group and two release strategies, For both strategies document types are common. First strategy contains the Material groups starting from "0001" to "0075" and second strategy contains material group from "0076" to 0086" which are capital goods. As the client requires that capital goods need to be approved by 4 levels instead of 2 levels as in case of normal material group.
Now my question is whenever we make a PO which consist of the materials of same group then onnly release strategy is attaching to it, i.e. all materials in PO should be of same material group. If atleast one material has different group then release strategy is not attaching. How to tackle this type of situation??
Regards
Lakshminath Gunda

Hi,
We have used "ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST"
Can't give you the exact code now, but logic is built like below -
Tcode - ME21N
If PO DocType E ZPO1
If Comp code E 1000
Then check Material group - Purchase group combination in ZMMT_MGPGR (We maintained the linkage in external Table)
If MtrlGrp & PurGrp combination matches in ZMMT_MGPGR then only system allows to proceed further else gives error "enter Correct Purchase Group".
You can trigger check this on ENTER key OR while checking / saving the PO.
So, now user can not create PO with different material group in a single PO. So in ur case for capital items he can only choose from capital item materials group. And so ur release strategy will trigger based on that material groups.
Hope this will solve your problem.
Regards,
Rakesh

Task Filtering in UWL based on Classification in R3

Hi All,
I trying to find out if there is any option in UWL to filter the Task list by the Task classification given at the R3 side. I am refering to the classification which specify at the task level in PFTC -> Addtional Data-> Classification.
By standard the classifications are: Disciplinary, Peronal, Professional.
Do you have any idea how can i achieve that?
Thanks,
Prakash Pandey

Hi Prakash,
Is this category stored in the workflow container? If so then you can set it up as a custom attribute in the UWL view and then create a filter on this (by modifying the XML for the UWL). If it's not in the container then perhaps you need to write some ABAP code to add it to the workflow container.
I apologise I don't currently have access to an ERP system to check if this attribute is in the container.
Cheers,
E

Document rule based classification

from the example in oracle text developers guide i tried to build a rule based document classification, using the code given below:
create or replace package classifier as
procedure this;
end;
show errors
create or replace package body classifier as
procedure this
is
v_document     blob;
v_item          number;
v_doc           number;
begin
for doc in (select document_id, content from documents)
     loop
          v_document :=doc.content;
          v_item:=0;
          v_doc:=doc.document_id;
          for c in (select category_id, category_name from docs_cats_rule_based_class
               where matches(query,v_document)>0)
          loop
               v_item:=v_item +1;
               insert into doc_cat_rule_based_class values (doc.document_id, category_id);
          end loop;
     end loop;
end this;
end;
show errors
exec classifier.this
this gives the following errors:
package classifier Compiled.
line 5: SQLPLUS Command Skipped: show errors
package body Compiled.
line 32: SQLPLUS Command Skipped: show errors
Error starting at line 33 in command:
exec classifier.this
Error report:
ORA-04063: package body "STARDOC.CLASSIFIER" has errors
ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find program unit being called: "STARDOC.CLASSIFIER"
ORA-06512: at line 1
i think i am missing some grant to package. please help!

What version of Oracle are you using? Did you create the required tables and index in the earlier steps? What did you run it from? It appears that you did not run it from SQL*Plus. Please see the following demonstration that shows that it works fine on Oracle 10g when run from SQL*Plus with minimal privileges. I did not use any data.
SCOTT@10gXE> CREATE USER stardoc IDENTIFIED BY stardoc
2 /
User created.
SCOTT@10gXE> GRANT CONNECT, RESOURCE TO stardoc
2 /
Grant succeeded.
SCOTT@10gXE> CONNECT stardoc/stardoc
Connected.
STARDOC@10gXE>
STARDOC@10gXE> create table news_table
2    (tk    number primary key not null,
3      title varchar2(1000),
4      text clob)
5 /
Table created.
STARDOC@10gXE> create table news_categories
2    (queryid number primary key not null,
3      category varchar2(100),
4      query      varchar2(2000))
5 /
Table created.
STARDOC@10gXE> create table news_id_cat
2    (tk         number,
3      category_id number)
4 /
Table created.
STARDOC@10gXE> create index news_cat_idx on news_categories (query)
2 indextype is ctxsys.ctxrule
3 /
Index created.
STARDOC@10gXE> create or replace package classifier
2 as
3    procedure this;
4 end classifier;
5 /
Package created.
STARDOC@10gXE> show errors
No errors.
STARDOC@10gXE> create or replace package body classifier
2 as
3    procedure this
4    is
5       v_document    clob;
6       v_item        number;
7       v_doc            number;
8    begin
9       for doc in (select tk, text from news_table)
10       loop
11         v_document := doc.text;
12         v_item := 0;
13         v_doc := doc.tk;
14         for c in
15           (select queryid, category from news_categories
16            where matches (query, v_document) > 0)
17         loop
18            v_item := v_item + 1;
19            insert into news_id_cat values (doc.tk,c.queryid);
20         end loop;
21       end loop;
22    end this;
23 end classifier;
24 /
Package body created.
STARDOC@10gXE> show errors
No errors.
STARDOC@10gXE> exec classifier.this
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
STARDOC@10gXE>

Value Base permits

Hi Every one,
I want to know that is there any possiblity at permits level like value base
For Exapmle
If the cost of order is blow 50,000 then this permit will be aproved by person X
and when cost of order increases above 50,000 then permit will be aproved by person Y
I hope I m clear in my question
looking forward for response

Hi,
You can have permits assigned based on classification values.
See note 331093 for some more information. Not sure if this gives you exactly what you want or not.
-Paul
Please use the EAM forum for PM/CS specific issues

Permit classification for WBS element (for PM order)

Hi!
I've set up an automatic permit based on classification and it is working already correctly (for the field CSEVPERMIT-ILART).
I would like to set up an another automatic permit, but for the WBS element (CSEVPERMIT-PSPEL). However this field is a numberic(8) field, so it allows only numbers (like 12345678), which is the ID of the WBS element in the database (which is the PRPS-PSPNR).
But I have to set up the automatical permit based on the "useful" ID of the WBS element (PRPS-POSID).
I have to set it up with the following mask: L++++++T* (if the WBS element matches the mask, then the permit have to appear in the order's permit list).
Is there a way to achive this?
Thank you
Tamá

Tamás,
I dont think you will be able to achieve this through standard config. As indicated , you cannot use POSID field since its not part of the structure CSEVPERMIT. You will definetly have to use the existing field PSPEL.
If you are in ECC 6.0, you could use the implicit enhancement functionality to enhance the existing flow to provide your own custom logic within FM PERMIT_PROPOSAL_BY_CLASS. You will also have to store the Mask to check in a different location , since PSPEL is a numeric field.
Also beaware that unless you are modifying your existing class to add the WBS element field also, you will not be able to assign two different permit classes to permits.
Regards
Narasimhan

Regarding Invocie Attchement classification

Hi ,
Is it possible to classify attachments in the invoice from ODC and when it is committed to IPM, user can filter and see attachment as per his requirement.I am explaining requirement below.
For eg. During the time of Invoice scan Invoice came with 50 total number of pages.
1) First 10 pages are Actual Invoice.
2)10-20 page no are representing "PO" related additional information in the form of attachments
3)20-30 page no are representing "measurement" sheets
4)30-50 page no "other" type of documents.
Now during the time of scan through ODC initiator user want to clasify the doc as per above type and commite the doc from ODC.
Now in IPM when it is assigned to user is it possible that user can filter based on classification.
For eg if user want to see invoies then only 0-10 page shown first.
if user want to see the PO then 10-20 page shown first.
if user want to see measurment sheet then 20-30 measurement sheet first.
if user want to see other type the 30-50 page number first.
Is it possible to achieve this requirement with existing Imaging AP-solution?

Amit,
1) I created a metadata field called "DocType", the value of the level 2 separators is put into this field, there is another field called "Envelope" which gets the value "Envelope from the level 1 separator but this is overwritten by the script with a GUID. Here are the separators, we only have two types, "Invoice" and "Attachment" The envelope separator is used for level 1, the value is not necessary but WEC expects one, teh patch code is used to set the level of the separator
2) Four documents, in your case each a different doc type set by the barcode value. For each doc type you have different commit driver settings so only the Invoice type outputs files to the WFR import folder, the other docs go to other folders but all have the same GUID so they can get linked to the invoice during workflow, usually WFR adds enough delay extracting invoice data so that the other docs are ready and waiting when the invoice comes in, you can also make sure invoice type is lowest priority.

Maintenance order cost control through Permit

Hi
I want to know whether Maintenance order release approval on the basis of planned cost can be done on the basis of issuing Permits. May I please be guided with the process for this?
Thanks

Hi,
This topic has been discussed many times in this FORUM , u can search up
check this link http://www.sap-img.com/plant/complete-help-to-implement-maintenance-cost-approval.htm
Link 2 :- http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=132912
Link 3 :- http://aq33.com/quality-management/Articles-000534.html
If u want to have more level of permits based on planned costs then u you need to create Charac in CT04 , assign that in class
This class you need to give in IPMD while creating permits -under classification -> Here u need to mention the characteristic , In the characteristic - u need to mention the range , if u mention range as 0- 2500

Permit to Order type

Dear Experts
Problem:
I want to control the Order Release using Permits when the Cost (Planned) is greater than 10K.
Done:
1. For this Class is create with two characteristics ( Cost (plan) and Order Type )
2. Maintained Permit in IPMD for Order.
Issue:
This permit is now applicable to all the Order Types but i want to restrict this to only any specific Order Type.
Kindly provide the way to assign permit to any specific Order Type.
Thanks in advance for your valuable answers.

Hi ,
I believe your assigning the permits here to order based on Classification ..
If yes then create a charc CT04 in Add Tab in Table field use : CSEVPERMIT , Field :AUART
Click not ready for Input box in CT04 in Add tab
Use this Char in Class and assign that in a particular permit ,
In permit IPMD , Classification tab mention class , charc : mention values as PM01
So i believe this permit will get assigned to PM01 Order type only ..
In addition to the above u can use Charac for costs also actual or planned etc in the class
This should give some idea ..
regrds
pushpa

Issue With Page Break When Sorting is also applied on group

Hi
I am facing an issue with Page break only when I have sorting applied on the grouping that I have in the template.
The following is the sample XML
<ROWSET>
<ROW>
<GRE>org1</GRE>
<ORGANIZATION>Accounts</ORGANIZATION>
<FULL_NAME>test1,</FULL_NAME>
<ELEMENT_NAME>TEST BONUS</ELEMENT_NAME>
<CLASSIFICATION>Supplemental Earnings</CLASSIFICATION>
<RUN_VALUE>250</RUN_VALUE>
<MONTH_VALUE>500</MONTH_VALUE>
<QUARTER_VALUE>500</QUARTER_VALUE>
<YEAR_VALUE>500</YEAR_VALUE>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<GRE>org1</GRE>
<ORGANIZATION>Finance</ORGANIZATION>
<FULL_NAME>test2</FULL_NAME>
<ELEMENT_NAME>VOLUNTARY AD AND D</ELEMENT_NAME>
<CLASSIFICATION>Voluntary Deductions</CLASSIFICATION>
<RUN_VALUE>5.19</RUN_VALUE>
<MONTH_VALUE>10.38</MONTH_VALUE>
<QUARTER_VALUE>10.38</QUARTER_VALUE>
<YEAR_VALUE>10.38</YEAR_VALUE>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<GRE>org1</GRE>
<ORGANIZATION>Finance</ORGANIZATION>
<FULL_NAME>test3</FULL_NAME>
<ELEMENT_NAME>HMO MEDICAL</ELEMENT_NAME>
<CLASSIFICATION>Pre-Tax Deductions</CLASSIFICATION>
<RUN_VALUE>19.67</RUN_VALUE>
<MONTH_VALUE>39.34</MONTH_VALUE>
<QUARTER_VALUE>39.34</QUARTER_VALUE>
<YEAR_VALUE>39.34</YEAR_VALUE>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<GRE>org1</GRE>
<ORGANIZATION>Finance</ORGANIZATION>
<FULL_NAME>test4</FULL_NAME>
<ELEMENT_NAME>PENSION NR DC</ELEMENT_NAME>
<CLASSIFICATION>Pre-Tax Deductions</CLASSIFICATION>
<RUN_VALUE>0</RUN_VALUE>
<MONTH_VALUE>360</MONTH_VALUE>
<QUARTER_VALUE>360</QUARTER_VALUE>
<YEAR_VALUE>360</YEAR_VALUE>
</ROW>
</ROWSET>
In the template I group the data based on CLASSIFICATION and then sort on the same column CLASSIFICATION. I have a page-break applied for every group.
When I generate the PDF, I am not getting the page-breaks for every group. Instead some of them are displayed in the same page.
But when I remove the sorting that I had in the template on the column CLASSIFICATION, I am getting the output in the desired way but not in a sorted order.
kumar

Hi All,
I am using MS-WORD 2007 and BI Publisher desktop 10.1.3.3.3.
When I use split-by-page-break, splitting is performed for every line .. but not for group of lines.
Can anybody throw some light on this?
FYI...
I am using this code:
?if: position() mod 6= 0?
?split-by-page-break:?
?end if?
(Of course with in tags)
in G_LINES loop.
Can anybody help me out :-(
--Saritha

Color formatting in SSAS

Using SQL Server 2008 R2:
I have a star schema with a fact table containing the following:
ID BIGINT IDENTITY, FK_Dimension1 BIGINT, FK_Dimension2 BIGINT,
dataValue NUMERIC(20, 8), classification NVARCHAR(20)
The classification defines the security classification for each dataValue, and can contain either "public" or "confidential".
I've created a degenerate dimension which contains the classification field, and the dataValue resides in the associated measure table.
My requirement is to format the dataValue in any tool that is rendering the data as RED if any value in the aggregation of that field contains an associated classification of "confidential". So for example if in an excel pivot table I was displaying
the aggregation of 3 values and one of them was confidential then the value should display as red text.
I have the following MDX query in my cube calculations to handle the formatting:
CALCULATE;
SCOPE
[Measures].[dataValue]
If([MyDegenDimension].[Classification].[Confidential]) Then
Fore_Color(This) = 255
End If;
END SCOPE;
This works great whenever there are values in the dataValue field other than zero. If I drill down in my pivot table to show a single value that happens to be zero then the color formatting does not apply. The business requirement is that any confidential value
should be flagged as red, and it's valid that a zero value could be confidential. Note it displays the dataValue as red even if the classification dimension is not used in the pivot table.
Is there any way I can alter my MDX query so that it works for zero values as well?

Hi Greg,
According to your description, you need to set the measure value to red when associated classification measure value is "confidential", right?
In your scenario, there is a classification value for each record, right? In this case, you can create a measure based on classification, then set the DataValue measure value's color based on the classification measure. Here is the sample query for you reference.
CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.[Measure].[X] AS [Measures].[DataValue]
, FORE_COLOR=IIF([Measures].[Classification]="confidential", RGB(255,0,0), RGB(0,0,0))
, BACK_COLOR=RGB(255,255,255)
, FONT_SIZE=10
, FORMAT_STRING='#,#.000'
Reference
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-IN/library/ms145573.aspx
Regards,
Charlie Liao
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

CHANGE OVER FROM TAXINJ TO TAXINN

HI ALL ,
TAXINJ and TAXINN cannot co exist in the same system.
If you are talking about technical Upgrade, then I don't think this would be feasible since old Txn would have got posted with TAXINJ procedure with rates as defined in Tax codes and now after migration to TAXINN in same box, the system would pick value from Condition records.
Just check this basic point of feasibility before we go ahead and look for changes.
In SuN the change is for existing implementation, here at present they have R/3 4.7, and are now in the process of technical upgrade to ECC 6.00; TAXINN is required to be implemented in the upgraded version.
At present they are using around 129 pricing procedures, 25 sales org,220 tax codes in TAXINJ. Suzlon has 21 company codes, 219 plants and 1300 end users the whole nature of group activities results in use of all possible types of indirect taxes in India like VAT, CST, Excise, Service Tax etc...
i have tried to search on sap help, service market place and others but could not come across any document for the change over. However i will try again.
what are the things i need to take care before any implications busisneww point of view, what will be the status of open sales order and purchase orders, and splitting delivery docs. which are under process, what will be the cutoverstrategy.
need ur help and guidance, thanks in advance.
We are migrating from 4.7 to ECC 6.00 ( technical upgrade only), at the same time we will shift from TAXINJ to TAXINN,please let us know the steps requred to do this activity.
RELEASE NOTES OR OSSNOTES, ANY DOCUMENT STEP BY STEP IS REQUIRED asap.
CHEERS
SRI_CNU

Hi
Vasu Sri,
I got this document from some body might help u a bit.
Condition-Based Excise Determination in MM (New)
As of SAP R/3 Enterprise Core 4.70 (SAP_APPL 470), the system can calculate excise duties
and sales tax in Materials Management (MM) using the standard condition technique.
SAP has enhanced the existing tax procedure, TAXINJ, so that it now supports formula-based
and condition-based excise determination. The R/3 System also comes with a new tax procedure,
TAXINN, which only handles condition-based excise determination.
Which Tax Procedure Must I Use?
Existing customers must continue to work using the same tax procedure.
If you switch to a new tax procedure, you cannot display any documents that you have already
posted using the old tax procedure.
If you have worked with formula-based excise determination in previous releases and wish to
continue, you do not have to do anything. However, if you wish to start using the
condition-based excise determination method, proceed as specified below.
We recommend that new customers use the condition-based excise determination and tax
procedure TAXINN.
<b>How Do the New Functions Work?</b>
First, customize the system in the activities listed below. Then, for each material, create one
condition record for each form of excise duty and sales tax that applies, and enter the tax code
for purchasing documents (see below) in every condition record.
When you come to create a purchase order, enter the tax code in each line item. The tax code
tells the system whether to look in the condition types for formula-based or condition-based
excise determination
To set up the new excise determination method, carry out the following activities:
IMG activity
What to do
Check Calculation Procedure
Existing customers: Adjust your tax procedure to
match the changes to TAXINJ. Steps 560-583 are new, as are 593-598.
New customers: Create a copy of TAXINN.
Select Tax Calculation Procedure
New customers only: Assign the copy of
TAXINN to India.
Maintain Excise Defaults
New customers only: Enter the condition type
that you use for countervailing duty.
Define Tax Code for Purchasing Documents
Define a tax code.
Assign Tax Code to Company Codes
Assign the tax code to the company codes that it
is relevant for.
Classify Condition Types
Specify which condition types you want to use
for condition-based excise determination.
Define Tax Accounts
Check which G/L accounts the various taxes will
be posted to. Define G/L accounts for the account keys used in the tax procedure
6 MM
Materialwirtschaft
16.1 Country Version India in Standard R/3 System
Verwendung
As of SAP R/3 Enterprise Core 4.70 (SAP_APPL 470), Country Version India is no longer
delivered as an add-on but as part of the standard R/3 System.
Integration of functions in the SAP Easy Access menu
The functions for withholding tax have been integrated into the SAP Easy Access menu, under
Accounting -> Financial Accounting -> Accounts Payable -> Withholding Tax ->
India and Accounting -> Financial Accounting -> Accounts Receivable -> Withholding
Tax -> India.
You can access all other functions using the area menu J1ILN, which you can call from the
SAP Easy Access screen using the transaction code J1ILN.
Country Version India Implementation Guide
The Country Version India Implementation Guide (IMG) has been integrated into the standard
Reference IMG (see Changes to Structures for Country Version India).
Release Notes
You can access release notes from previous add-on releases using the links below.
SAP Library Documentation
The SAP Library documentation for Country Version India is also delivered on the standard
SAP Library documentation CD (see below).
New and Changed Functions
For information about new and changed functions for Country Version India, see the other
release notes for this release.
Auswirkungen auf den Datenbestand
You do not need to change any data.
Auswirkungen auf das Customizing
IMG activity
What to do
Activate Country Version India for Specific Fiscal Years
Delete the entry ZIND and
create a new entry for IND.
Siehe auch
SAP Library -> Financials or Logistics -> Country Versions -> Asia-Pacific -> India.
Release Notes from Country Version India Add-On (FI)
Release Notes from Country Version India Add-On (SD)
SAP AG
1
SAP-System
Page 9
Release Notes from Country Version India Add-On (MM)
16.2 Condition-Based Tax Calculation (New)
Verwendung
As of SAP R/3 Enterprise Core 4.70 (SAP_APPL 470), a new method for calculating taxes
in Brazil is available, which makes use of the standard condition technique. Tax rates, tax laws,
and special indicators that influence whether tax line items are included in the nota fiscal are all
stored in the system as condition records. An additional tax calculation procedure, TAXBRC, is
delivered for this new method, in addition to the existing one for Brazil, TAXBRJ.
Auswirkungen auf den Datenbestand
You can continue to calculate taxes using the former method: when the system processes the tax
procedure assigned to the country (TAXBRJ), it calculates the taxes externally by calling
function module J_1BCALCULATE_TAXES. We do, however, recommend that you assign the
new procedure TAXBRC and use the condition-based tax calculation functions, as it enables you
to flexibly adapt the tax calculation logic to cover new legal requirements or special customer
needs.
You will need to migrate your existing tax rate table entries to condition records, which you
can do directly from the Tax Manager's Workplace described below. You can check all tables
and subsequently convert the entries, whereby the system generates condition records. After the
initial migration, each time you create or change a tax rate table entry, the system automatically
generates a condition record as needed.
Auswirkungen auf das Customizing
If you want to employ the new condition-based tax calculation, you need to activate it and
carry out all related Customizing activities, under Financial Accounting -> Financial
Accounting Global Settings -> Tax on Sales/Purchases -> Basic Settings -> Brazil
-> Condition-Based Tax Calculation, all of which are new:
o
Activate Condition-Based Tax Calculation
o
Map MM Tax Values to Nota Fiscal Fields
o
Map SD Tax Values to Nota Fiscal Fields
o
Map MM Tax Laws to Nota Fiscal Fields
o
Define Internal Codes for Tax Conditions
o
Assign Internal Codes for Tax Conditions to Condtion Types
o
Assign Tax Rate Tables to Condition Tables
In addition, you need to assign the new tax calculation procedure TAXBRC to the country in
Customizing, under Financial Accounting -> Financial Accounting Global Settings ->
Tax on Sales/Purchases -> Basic Settings -> Assign Country to Calculation Procedure.
A new Customizing tool called the Tax Manager's Workplace is available that enables you to
SAP AG
2
SAP-System
Page 10
make all tax-related settings for Brazil. You access it under the same path as above through
Tax on Sales/Purchases, then Calculation -> Settings for Tax Calculation in Brazil ->
Access Tax Manager's Workplace, or alternatively by entering transaction J1BTAX. You can
use the Tax Manager's Workplace regardless if you use condition-based tax calculation; it
simply brings all tax activities to a single transaction (only the Migration, Nota-Fiscal Mapping,
and Condition Mapping options under the Condition Setup pulldown menu are relevant only for
condition-based tax calculation).
16.3 Changes to Structures for Country Version India
Verwendung
As of SAP R/3 4.7, Country Version India is no longer delivered as an add-on, but forms part
of the standard system.
SAP has discontinued the Country Version India Implementation Guide (IMG) and has added its
activities have been added to the standard Reference IMG as follows:
Activities relating to withholding tax are now located in Customizing for Financial
Accounting (FI), under Financial Accounting Global Settings -> Withholding Tax.
Activities relating to excise duty and excise invoices are in Customizing for Logistics -
General, under Tax on Goods Movements -> India.
As far as the activities under Preparatory Activities are concerned, two of them (Activate
Country Version India for Accounting Interface and Activate Processes) are no longer
relevant and have been removed from the IMG entirely. The activity Execute Country
Installation Program is already included in the standard IMG under the name Localize Sample
Organizational Units. And the other two activities (Activate Country Version India for Specific
Fiscal Years and Activate Business Transaction Events) have been added to the standard IMG.
For information about other changes to the IMG relating to changes in the functions in Country
Version India, see the other release notes.
16.4 Release Notes from Country Version India Add-On (MM)
Verwendung
The Release Notes from Releases 3.0A and 4.0A of Country Version India for Materials
Managment (MM) are listed below. For more Release Notes, see the alias globalization in
SAPNet, and choose Media Center -> Country-Specific Documentation -> Country Version
India - Release Notes.
Release 3.0A
o
CENVAT Credit on Capital Goods After Budget 2000 (Changed)
o
Multiple Goods Receipts for Single Excise Invoices
SAP AG
3
SAP-System
Page 11
o
Enhancements to CVD Solution
o
Pricing Date Control in Excise
o
Order Price Unit in Excise
o
Alternate Assets MODVAT Capitalization
o
Enhancements for 57 F4
o
User Exits for Customer Validations
Release 4.0A
o
Procurement Transactions for Excise Invoices
o
New Transactions Based on User Roles for Incominng Excise Invoices
o
Capture Excise Invoices with Reference to Multiple POs for the Same Vendor
o
Capture Excise Invoice and Post CENVAT in a Single Step
o
Open Schedule Quantity Defaulted in Excise Capture for Scheduling Agreement
o
Accounting Document Simulation for CENVAT Postings
o
Rejection Codes for Excise Invoices
o
Single-Screen Transaction for All Excise-Related Entries
o
Stock Transfer Orders Through MM Route
o
Excise Invoices for Multiple Import Purchases
o
Customs Invoices Can Be Captured Using Logistics Invoice Verification and Conventional
Invoice Verification
o
Material Type at Line Item Level
o
Excise Invoice Capture Without PO
o
Excise Invoice Without PO - Capture and Post in a Single Step
o
Recalculation of Duty and Excise Defaults Restore Feature Available
o
Split of Nondeductible Taxes During Excise Invoice Capture
o
Error or Warning Messages Displayed at the Time of Saving
o
Reversal of Excise Duty
o
MIGO Solution Available as a Note 0408158 (Featuring All Functionalities as in MB01)
o
Excise Invoice Defaults in Excise Popup at Goods Receipt
o
Split Accounting Lines for CENVAT Posting
o
Authorization for Incoming Excise Invoices Extended
o
Authorization Available for Part I Entry at GR
o
Authorization Available for Register Update Transaction
o
User Exit Available for Incoming Excise Invoice Transaction for Defaulting Values
SAP AG
4
SAP-System
Page 12
o
User Exit Available for Incoming Excise Invoice Transaction Before Database Update
o
User Exit Available for Register Update for Validations on Fetched Records Based on
Selection Criteria
o
User Exit Available for Register Update of RGSUM Register
o
User Exit Available for Excise Invoice Create for Other Movements to Default the Excise
Details
o
Register Update Separately Handled for Receipts and Issues Based on Classification Code
o
Ship-From Vendor Can Be Defaulted and Captured in Incoming Excise Invoices for Other
Movements
o
Removal Time Can Be Captured in Excise Invoices for Other Movements
o
Field Selection of Incoming Excise Invoices
o
Transaction Code Customizing for Incoming Excise Invoices
o
Excise Group Setting for Part I Indicator for Blocked Stock, Stock Transfer Order, and
Consumption Stock
o
Multiple Goods Receipts and Multiple/Single Credit Settings Available at Excise Group
Level
o
Rejection Code Master Setting for Posting on Hold Is Available
o
Stock Transport Orders

ACS 5.1 and different network access profiles

I am trying to set up radius access on 2 different SSIDs coming from an Access point. The 802.1x rules will be different based on which SSID the user is connecting to. One will be more restrictive than the other.
in my example the ap is 10.1.0.1
the ssids would be "inside" and "outside"
for the inside ssid, I would like to verify they are a domain user
for the "outside" i want them to be in a specific group. I have the group already confured in radius.
I can do either one successfully, but I do not know how to map the device to two different access policies.
Would this be just mapping different permits based on which authentication rule they passed?

Hello,
You would need to edit your existing policies and add one anothetr customized condition called compound condition ( in addition to whatever condition you may have already).. chose radius ietf dictionary and chose the attribute called-station-id. Usually the ssid is sent as part of this attribute. you can match the value to either 'inside' or 'outside' and chose the result that would best suit that ssid. I think it may be easy enough for you to take it up from this point. Let me know if the explanation isn't clear.
Thanks,
Mani

About workflow problem in 4.6C for PR

Hello Expert:
i met a quesiton about the workflow for PR in 4.6C.
the detail is as following.
The requestor created a PR for waiting for approve, there are 3 approvor to handle the PR.
maybe the second approvor modified the quantity or amount of the PR before release, but system seems can't trigger the new workflow to go back to first approver in 4.6C. So once the second approvor released the modified PR, then the PR will go to next approver. Now my requirement is to hope the workflow can get back to start point for waiting for approval. or could i close the PR completely.
even i am cancelled the PR, the purchasing group can generate new PO with the cancelled PR as well.
Did you face the same problem in 4.6C workflow?
hope to get your help
Thanks in advance
Kevin

Hello Kevin,
you can find this setting in the customizing tree:
I assume that you're using purchase requisition item based released based on classification
MM>Purch.>Req>Rel.Proc.>with class. -->Set up procedure with classification
Push "Release indicator"
Select the release indicator that blocks your PO (e.g. X blocked)
Using the SAP Standard only you have the following two choices that makes the most sense:
- Changebility = 1 i.e. cannot be changed
- Changebility = 4 and Value change = 0,00   i.e. changeable and new release on value change
The first option locks the requisition for any changes at all, forcing your purchasing group to re-create the PR once it should be changed.
The second option allows any change, but when the value is touched in any way (+/- 0%) all previously given release codes will be reset making the release all-over again.
I tip that the second option is the one you're looking for.
If both option are not workable for your requirement, you have to create an additional event (as one of the previous contributors Aditya already mentioned), which could be restricted to the fields that you want your requisition to reset with.
Then you have to throw in an event coupling where you use as a receiver event function module a custom-made function module that runs through the release codes of the requisition to reset all releases. This is done using the function module BAPI_REQUISITION_RESET_RELEASE. If you're choosing this way, I propose that you go a bit forward and open a new thread. But I remember that I was proposing this solution a couple of months ago. So maybe searching the forum could be a good idea then.
With the very best wishes,
   Florin
Edited by: Florin Wach on Mar 4, 2009 6:03 PM:   The proposed paths also apply to all versions >= 4.6B

Recommendation for maintaining pricing in CRM when R/3 is also in landscape

Hi,
in out context we have already SAP R/3 in the landscape, all the pricing in done in R/3. lot of custom pricing routines are also written in r/3.
now we in the process of implementing CRM and plan to do Quotations in CRM and replicate in SAP R/3 . what is the recommendation for such a scenario.
do we replicate all pricing conditions/procedures in CRM? do we need to re-do all procedures in IPC?
can we re-determine pricing in R/3 so that we can avoid such work in CRM? we are using configurable products in R/3.
please share your thoughts/best practices and any document will be of help.
thanks
RH

Hi Swaroop,
The Assignment of Buisness Partner classification from CRM to R3 is purely based on Classification
so your initial Entry
I chose B as classification & Z001 as an account group which is a copy of 0001. System takes it.
was taken by the system
now when you tried to make another Entry by the same Classification
chose B again & this time Z002 acc gp (copy of 0002), and system does not allow?
it checks for the Existing Classification and so does not allow the same
Delete the Previous Entry and then Try Entering the New Entry
The System shall Take it
Hope it Answered your Queries...
Revert Back for any Doubts..
Also Chk the Link for details:http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/04/4d9ac77b2b11d3b52f006094b9114a/content.htm
Thanks and Regards,
RK.

Permits based on classification.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for