Value Base permits

Hi Every one,
I want to know that is there any possiblity at permits level like value base
For Exapmle
If the cost of order is blow 50,000 then this permit will be aproved by person X
and when cost of order increases above 50,000 then permit will be aproved by person Y
I hope I m clear in my question
looking forward for response

Hi,
You can have permits assigned based on classification values.
See note 331093 for some more information. Not sure if this gives you exactly what you want or not.
-Paul
Please use the EAM forum for PM/CS specific issues

Similar Messages

How to create value base permits ?

Hi Every one,
How to create value base permits
For Exapmle
If the cost of order is blow 50,000 then this permit will be aproved by person X
and when cost of order increases above 50,000 then permit will be aproved by person Y
I hope I m clear in my question
looking forward for response

Hi,
You can use class characteristics concept for the permit with value There is class type 049 for permit/licenece in the system.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/b8/6cc5371e5db25fe10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
Ramesh

Value based permits

Hi Every one,
I want to know that is there any possiblity at permits level like value base
For Exapmle
If the cost of order is blow 50,000 then this permit will be aproved by person X
and when cost of order increases above 50,000 then permit will be aproved by person Y
I hope I m clear in my question
looking forward for response

hi iftikhar,
1.create ct04[characteristic]and maintain values 10k,20kof some range if your going to call permits on planning cost here in additional tab mention the table[CSEVPERMIT] & any field names
ILART-Maintenance activity type
PKOSTEN for planning cost
USER4 for estimated cost
IKOSTEN for actual cost.
2.Create permit class and put the charc in permit class and for class type 049 maintain classification status in IMG.[Cross application components--> classification system->classes---->maintain object types and object keys(here plz read the note and maintain status for class type 049).
3.Create permits using IPMD and put category , order status and goto classification and maintain permit class and select particular charc value for that permit.
By the above process respective permits [assume that you have given based on planned cost of the order]get automatically assigned to the order,now you can maintain authorisation for the permit.
Hope this might have met you requirement.
Plz try the same and let me know if you have any querries or no .If working give up points'''
regards
pushpa

Value-Basis Free Goods in ME21N

In PO creation, is it possible for free goods to be on value-basis rather than quantity-basis?
For example: If I buy A 1000USD, I'll get one B for free.
Cheers,
VT

Hi VT,
One more option....
Create PO with two line item,one line item for A and second line item for B.
To get the item B free, you have to select the check box of free item in the second line item.
if you will scroll right in PO line item you will get the check box of free item.
Regards,
Manish

Viewobject transcient attribute update value base on other field

Dear All,
I have a viewobject with a transcient attribute which is calculated based on some other attributes queried from the DB. I have set the default value of the transcient field using the express:
adf.object.viewObject.getFTType()
and the getFTType() in the viewObjectImpl will return a string base on other fields' values;
Then I test it in the AM Model tester and it looks fine. However, when I drag this VO to a Table in the page, the transcient field column always showing the same value on every rows instead of showing different values base on the other fields on each row.
I've added a button to print the selected row values in the table and after I click on the button, the transcient field column is updated according to my selected row other fields' values and it updates the value for the whole column instead of only the selected row.
I wonder if there is sth wrong I did? Thanks a lot.
The getFTType() method is pasted here:
public String getFTType() {
Row row = this.getCurrentRow();
String ftType = "";
try {
if (row.getAttribute("TxType").toString().equals("99")) { // all non-GJs
if (row.getAttribute("InputFutureTrfDate") != null) { // Future type FT
if (row.getAttribute("TiMToMYorn") != null) {
if (!row.getAttribute("TiMToMYorn").toString().toLowerCase().equals("y")) {
if (row.getAttribute("TrfMethod").toString().equals("5")) {
ftType = "ECI FT (Future)";
} else {
ftType = "Misc FT (Future)";
} else {
ftType = "Misc FT M to M (Future)";
} else {
if (row.getAttribute("TrfMethod").toString().equals("5")) {
ftType = "ECI FT (Future)";
} else {
ftType = "Misc FT (Future)";
} else { // non-future FT
if (row.getAttribute("TiMToMYorn") != null) {
if (!row.getAttribute("TiMToMYorn").toString().toLowerCase().equals("y")) {
if (row.getAttribute("TrfMethod").toString().equals("5")) {
ftType = "ECI FT";
} else {
ftType = "Misc FT";
} else {
ftType = "Misc FT M to M";
} else {
if (row.getAttribute("TrfMethod").toString().equals("5")) {
ftType = "ECI FT";
} else {
ftType = "Misc FT";
if (row.getAttribute("TxType").toString().equals("11")) {
ftType = "GJ Interest Income";
if (row.getAttribute("TxType").toString().equals("12")) {
ftType = "GJ Bank Charge";
if (row.getAttribute("TxType").toString().equals("13")) {
ftType = "GJ Others";
} catch (Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
return ftType;
}

Did you set recalculate on the field you are basing its value on.
See http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E16162_01/web.1112/e16182/bcintro.htm

Condition type maintained in Value basis

Hello,
Iam maintaining the ZADC condition in Pricing procedure for AED purpose...
Now at present we are maiantaining the this condition in 4% (Maintaining the condition type as percentage basis).
Now we are planning to maintain this condition in Value basis.... how to set this condition to take this as value not percentage.
Regards
sapman man

hi
go to M/06 here select ur condition ZADC
in calculation type u will see % remove it and gove fix value and save
befor doing this try to make all pos clear so it will not affect the other pos made earlier
hope it help
regards
kunal

Routines in pricing for freight as per value basis

Dear friends,
Im my Import pricing procedure if there are 10 line items and i wants to put over all freight as value . I can put at freight condition.
But my requirement is that -
if there are 10 lines items and having freight 100 (overall)
Then this freight should be devided on basis of line item value. (not quantity)
for this which routine should i use.
Please can any one update on it.
Regards,
mahesh.
Edited by: mahesh A on Aug 24, 2011 8:02 AM

Just make the your fregiht condition as "Header" in M/06 and check for "Group conditions" and then try to create PO and then check the same.

Error when replicating material master - Value not permitted for PO Unit

Hi all,
I am having the following issue. I am trying to replicate material master from ECC 6.0 to CRM 5.0, but I am getting an error to which I am not being able to find the solution:
Value GFO is not permitted for attribute Purchase Order Unit
    Message no. COM_PRCAT020
Diagnosis
    You want to specify that the value GFO is allowed for the attribute Purchase Order Unit. However, in attribute maintenance or in the
    higher-level category ('parent category'), you specified that the value GFO is not allowed for this attribute.
I tried to find where to edit this attribute in Customizing, and also in tcode COMM_ATTRSET, but I have no idea if this was the right direction.
Has anyone faced this issue before? I would really appreciate any help, since this is preventing me from completing material replication.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Joã

Hello Sudipta,
I checked the attribute in COMM_ATTRSET, but there aren't any specific values for it. There is a value table T006, which I believe is standard, and it contains UoM GFO.
With this being the case, the error I'm getting makes even less sense to me...
Can you tell me if in there is any other place in CRM where we can set UoM?
Thank you, once again.
Regards,
Joã

Wrong SSAS Grand Total Value Monthly Value base on Weekly Value

Dear All,
I Have calculated measures in my cube base on Weekly and Base on Monthly and different
Template Base .
For grand Total Weekly is fine but for Monthly is bad one.
Say calculated Measure Name "Weekly" with Syntax
CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.[Measures].[Weekly]
AS IIF(isempty([Measures].[Actual Quantity MTD]) or [Measures].[Actual Quantity MTD]=0 or isempty([Measures].[Original Plan Quantity MTD]) , null ,
IIF([Measures].[Original Plan Quantity MTD] =0 or isempty([Measures].[Original Plan Quantity MTD]),null,
IIF(
([Measures].[Actual Quantity MTD]-[Measures].[Original Plan Quantity MTD]) > 0 , 1 ,[Measures].[Actual Quantity MTD]/ [Measures].[Original Plan Quantity MTD] )))
The Result is good
here the picture
http://hpics.li/9fd22f2
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByY5H-XcydgiWGp0RzdWYWp0M2c&authuser=0
and for Monthly Calculation it was AVG of Weekly base on Time, Plant, and PSL Dimension
My calculated Monthly Measure Name "Monthly" with Syntax
CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.[Measures].[Monthly]
AS AVG (
DESCENDANTS([PSL].[PSL Description])*
DESCENDANTS([Plant].[Plant])*
DESCENDANTS([Finish Date].[Calendar],[Finish Date].[Calendar].[Month Year])
, AVG(([Finish Date].[Calendar].CURRENTMEMBER.CHILDREN), [Measures].[Weekly]))
The Result is Bad on Grand total
here the Picture link
http://hpics.li/5233b50
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByY5H-XcydgicEhtT1FpekRsbW8&authuser=0
Please help me why for the Result doesn't same. What do i Miss
Thank You
Yan

Hi Yan,
According to your description, you create a calculated measure in your cube, the problem is that grand Total for Monthly is incorrect, right?
In your scenario, the issue can be caused by that you used "*" and "/" in your calculated measure. In SSAS, one of the most common issues faced in mdx is grand total or sub total not coming properly when some arithmetic operations like
measure1 [* or + or - or /] measure2 is used, please refer to the link below to see the details.
http://vnu10.blogspot.jp/2011/01/mdx-grand-total-sub-total.html
Regards,

Two tables with different filter values base on a analysis

Hi guys,
let assume that I have a analysis with columns : group_id and sales.
Based on it I would like to create two tables : table1 where group_id =1 and table2 where group_id = 2.
Is OBIEE capable of doing it?
Regards,
Slavi

Hi Slavi,
You can do that in single analysis, but you need to have the group_id column two times.
That is, bring group_id_1, group_id_2 (same column), sales
Now in table 1,
bring group_id_1, sales
Then in selection steps for group_id_1 -> Select Members -> Action choose keep only -> choose the filter value 1
This will filter the table 1 with group_id 1
In table2 bring group_id_2, sales
Then do the same step for group_id_2 with value 2.
now in same report you have two reports with different filter.
If you want you can keep the same column name for both group_id columns, I just kept group_id_1, group_id_2 for easy reference.

How to capture excise on base value in miro

hi masters,
I am using batch management so in one batch purity defined 90%, when I am capturing excise in MIGO there is no problem its calculated on basis of base value but when i am doing MIRO there is calculating excise on amount of MIRO instead of PO value(base value).
pl. guide me how to capture excise in MIRO according to MIGO.
if I am using MRP indicater in migo there is no effect is coming in MIRO.
Regards,
Anurag

Your excise dept. is asking for incorrect process.
Today you have a material with concentration 90% and hence you wish to value material based on concentration, you will make payment to supplier based on concentration, your entire valuation is based on concentration, but when it comes to excise you want to take credit for overall qty.
Think of the scenario if this is allowed, and once concentration is 10%, the value as per qty is 1000, excise will be let us say 100, but you wish to make payment to supplier of 100 and also take credit of 100. how can you do this?
No doubt with some technical development you can achieve this, but process point of view its not correct. If this is allowed than every company will do this and input cost of each company would be as equal to credit of cenvat availed as possible. If you map this as per me you are not mapping correct process.
Regards,
Dakshesh

Condition Base Value Routine

Hello all,
I am currently facing an issue where we have created a Custom Condition Base value routine for a Tax Condition type.
In our scenario, we have Sales Tax condition type ZZTX which has the following parameters:
Cond. class       D Taxes
Calculat.type     A Percentage
Cond.category D Tax
Rounding rule       Commercial
Also since its a tax condition type, it is set to D - cannot be modified manually.
Also in the pricing procedure, the condition type is pointing row 301 to pickup the condition value basis. This is for the normal scenarios. However when a particular condition is satisfied (which is coded in routine 902 for ZZTX) the code in 902 is supposed to change the condition base value for ZZTX.
800     0     ZZTX     Tax for Sales     301                       10          902     MWS
This functionality is not working at this point. When I debug, I can see the code appending the calculated value to the condition base value for ZZTX.
However on the screen, I still see the condition base value being picked up from row 301.
I need some input from you guys so as to find it the condition type zztx should have some parameters set to allow the change or is there a problem in the 902 routine ?
Kindly advise
Thanks
Vin

Hi Vin,
Please check with your ABAP expert if he has done below to fetch calculated value to hold it correctly,
   l_val_190    TYPE kwert,   l_val_210    TYPE kbetr,
I guess it is to do with Data type only in your 902 routine
Hope this will solve your probelm,
Regards,
Siva

ERROR BRAIN (599): for characteristic 0FISCPER Please enter a valid value

Hi,
Weve an BI 7.0 System with Patch Level SP12 which is previously connected to an NW 7.0 Portal System + BI Java that has SP13 installed.
Were able to create Queries and Web Templates via Query Builder and WAD for BI 7.0 and publish to portal.
Recently, weve installed a new NW 7.0 Portal + BI Java with same package level. We made the configurations for Bex via Template Installer and everything is ok.
Our reports has a 0FISCPER characteristics and when we run the reports in new portal, it displays the report. But when we want to change period and click the button created to set period, a popup opens and errors like "for characteristic 0FISCPER Please enter a valid value " displayed on popup.
#1.5#005056915E48007200000013000016D000044A7EAFACF8B0#1207807880509#com.sap.ip.bi.base.application.message.impl.MessageBase#sap.com/irj#com.sap.ip.bi.base.application.message.impl.MessageBase#bcepik#2422##sapportal_TFP_5354550#bcepik#96c2d31006c411ddae48005056915e48#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_31##0#0#Error#1#/Applications/BI#Plain###A message was generated:
ERROR BRAIN (599): for characteristic 0FISCPER Please enter a valid value
MSGV1: 0FISCPER
MSGV2: 200.001.#
When we change BIs Portal back to old one by changing the RSPOR_T_PORTAL table (default portal), it still works there.
What may be cause this situation as it works on one portal and not works on another?
Best Regards

Hi,
Pls chk the Note 770174 - Values for 0FISCVARNT not correct - BRAIN E 599
Symptom
In case of web templates the value help for 0FISCYEAR doesnot work
correctly. Error message
For characteristic 0FISCVARNT, enter value in permitted format
comes up
Other terms
OLAP: F4 - 0FISCYEAR, 0FISCVARNT ,
0fiscyearvalues_generate, master data read class , value help , F4
Reason and Prerequisites
Program error
The selection option sent to the method 0fiscyearvalues_generate
based on 0FISCVARNT are not porcessed and hence as null row is
inserted in the resultset that cause the problem .
Solution
BW3.0B
           Import Support Package 24 for Release 3.0B (BW3.0B Patch 24 or SAPKW30B24) into your BW system. The Support Package will be available when note 0723193 with the short text "SAPBWNews BW 3.0B Support Package 24", describing this Support Package in more detail, is released for customers.
BW3.1C (Content)
           Import Support Package 18 for Release 3.1C (BW3.1C Patch 18 or SAPKW31C18) into your BW system. The Support Package will be available when note 0723260 with the short text "SAPBWNews BW 3.1C Support Package 18", describing this Support Package in more detail, is released for customers.
BW 3.50
           Import Support Package 9 for Release 3.50 (BW3.50 Patch 09 or SAPKW35009) into your BW system. The Support Package will be available when note 0763335 with the short text "SAPBWNews BW SP09 NetWeaver'04 Stack 09", describing this Support Package in more detail, is released for customers.
This note may already be available before the Support Package is released. However, the short text will still contain the words "preliminary version" in this case.
Hope this helps,
Regards
CSM Reddy

Shipment cost based on Value

I need your valuable suggestion on how to create the Value based shipment cost.
Our Process:
Create POS - Create Inbound delivery - Create Shipment - Create Shipment cost - Post Inbound Delivery.
So while posting the inbound delivery, the freight cost will post against the material. The invoice will be paid for the Vendor for the quantity purchased and freight charge will be paid for the freight Vendor(s).
We are adding the Vendor in the Shipment and adding the cost against the Vendor in the Shipment Cost.
Everything is working fine, but the shipment cost posting against the material was happening based on the delivery weight / quantity.
The reason for this asking the question is - we are receiving high value items and low value items with the same weight.
Question 1: Is it possible to have the shipment cost being split, calculated and posted against the material based on the PO Item received Value or PO Price
Quesion 2: Is it possible to post the shipment cost at a later date? Currently, the shipment cost posts when the inbound delivery is received (I know the material value will be posted when there is stock changes or price changes). But our issue is the invoice for the shipment cost will be received after a couple of days from the goods receipt. Right now we are entering couple of costs through assumption, then while postig the invoice, we adjust that value.
Note: I cannot enter the condition directly in the PO, as the same PO item will be partially received by multiple inbound deliveries

Freight carriers charges weight on the basis of Weight / volume of the items.SAP shipment works on the same principle.
Cost of transporting ton of Potataoes is same as transporting 10 ton of aluminium between two known destinations.
Hence it is illogical to distributes cost on the basis of item value. However if still you want to distribute the same on value basis then maintain freight condition(%) in PO as per your prefined logic of distribution of freight cost.
It is well known fact that cost of freight % is always higher in Low value items & iis low in case of High value items.
Regards,
Sanjay Kohli

How can I just display the selected value of a listbox in a report without the reverse display and selection buttons?

I am using a table which contains a text field with a lookup. I want to use the selected value of this field in a form which is acting as a selection form. No editing of the field's value is permitted. How do I just display the value of the field (which
is considered a listbox on the form) without the reverse display and the up and down selection buttons.
I can provide an illustration of the condition I am trying to overcome, but this system doesn't accept it.
Thank you for any suggestions or clarification you can provide.
Marj Weir

Thank you. I'll try that approach.
I found, after much experimentation, on a similar problem involving a multiselect lookup field, that if I make the field invisible, and add a textbox that displays the fieldname plus .column(0), it displays all the selected entries.
E.g.: staff.Column(0)
Staff is the field containing the last names of selected staff members.
staff.Value only shows the first name in the lookup list whether it is checked or not, so this is useless.
staff.column(0), however, (inexplicably) shows all the selected names, e.g. Jones, Smith, Wiggins.
Marj Weir

Value Base permits

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for