Photoshop Color Correction

I'm trying to edit 2 pictures, but because of the colors I'm having trouble correcting the color.
My first problem is a picture of a room I'm using for a real estate listing. The rooms walls are a light taupe color, the floors are an off white. When I take the picture, the floors and walls look almost the same shade, so when I try to darken or lighten the walls, I have difficulties.
Second, I have a door that has a black pattern on it. For the picture I'm trying to make the entire door look white and hide the huge black pattern. The trouble is, anytime I try to change the color of black, it won't change at all, not even lighten.
Can anyone help me or point me in the right direction. I've messed most of the color ocrrecting features of photshop and I still can't fix the problem. I've even watched 4 hour videos on color correcting :(

There are many applications, that can do CC (Color Correction, often referred to as Color Grading, or sometimes just Grading). Premiere Pro has many CC Effects, and these should be done on calibrated NTSC, or PAL, monitors, and not on the computer's monitors. One reason for this is that Premiere is not a Color Managed environment.
Adobe After Effects also has many (actually quite a few more) CC Effects, and is often used for this purpose, even if one is not using it for its normal operation - compositing.
Along with those, there are many 3rd party CC plug-ins, like Red Giant's Colorista.
Once one gets past indie films, Hollywood would use workstations designed specifically for CC, with software not commonly available to the vast majority of the public. Again, the work will be done on constantly calibrated monitors, and by skilled technicians, who do nothing else, all day long. A good starting point would be the Black Magic Da Vinci system, but this really only gets one's foot in the door.
To get a handle on CC for Video, I recommend The Arit and Technique of Digital Color Correction, Hullfish.
Color Correction in Video is a subject, where popluar books will fill a large library.
Good luck,
Hunt

Similar Messages

  • Photoshop Color correction and Special color Effects

    Can anybody pls tell me , how they create color corrections in movies like Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings. and all the other special color themes they create different images...
    I use photoshop a lot but m a amateur to color correction thing .

    There are many applications, that can do CC (Color Correction, often referred to as Color Grading, or sometimes just Grading). Premiere Pro has many CC Effects, and these should be done on calibrated NTSC, or PAL, monitors, and not on the computer's monitors. One reason for this is that Premiere is not a Color Managed environment.
    Adobe After Effects also has many (actually quite a few more) CC Effects, and is often used for this purpose, even if one is not using it for its normal operation - compositing.
    Along with those, there are many 3rd party CC plug-ins, like Red Giant's Colorista.
    Once one gets past indie films, Hollywood would use workstations designed specifically for CC, with software not commonly available to the vast majority of the public. Again, the work will be done on constantly calibrated monitors, and by skilled technicians, who do nothing else, all day long. A good starting point would be the Black Magic Da Vinci system, but this really only gets one's foot in the door.
    To get a handle on CC for Video, I recommend The Arit and Technique of Digital Color Correction, Hullfish.
    Color Correction in Video is a subject, where popluar books will fill a large library.
    Good luck,
    Hunt

  • Color Correcting Video

    I have a completed video that I made in iMovie. I'd like to know if it's possible to use photoshops color correcting abilities for my completed video.
    I know how to alter color in photoshop, but I don't know how to make a seperate color adjustment for each micro clip within the completed video. I can only get it to apply my color adjustments to the whole video, not just the section that I wanted edited.
    I hope that makes sense
    Thanks in advance!

    I think I answered my own question. I had to drag (as in editing) each adjustment layer to the part of the video that I wanted adjusting. I uneded up having a lot of adjustment layers...

  • Snow Leopard's Default Gamma & Color Correcting for Pre Press in Photoshop CS4

    After searching the forums I thought I would start my own thread on this subject.
    I have Photoshop CS4 and InDesign CS4 and I have continued to color correct, for pre press, in OS 10.4.11 Tiger with the 1.8 Default Gamma and 6500 color tempurature, using Apple's display calibration tools in the OS's System Preferances.
    I want to switch to Snow Leaopard but with it's Defualt Gamma of 2.2, I'm not able to make my minitor manually adjust to the needed range for brightness and contrast that is needed to begin the calibration process.  Is there a way to color correct photos, for pre pre press, in Photoshop with a 2.2 Gamma setting in my display preferances?

    I have had success just with Apple's System Preferences for color calibration.  I do design and pre press for a number of customers of the various printers I work with.  Most of the photos I work with are from digital cameras and are provided by the customer.  The only point in the whole process, where the photos get adjusted to have eye pleasing color, when coming off the printing press, is when I work with them.
    The printers I work with continue to send their customers to me, for design and pre press, because they like my color work on the photos.  I send the pre press files as Press Optimized PDFs to the printer's FTP server and the printer does all the direct to plate separations in-house.  I want to continue to be reliable in that area and so the brighter default Gamma built into Snow Leopard seems to complicate things if I ever want to move up from Tiger to Snow Leopard.
    I have two 17" Apple CRT displays that cannot adjust into calibration range when I'm booted in Snow Leopard. These CRT displays can only manually adjust in range for calibration under Tiger or Leopard. It sounds like if I purchase an IPS based LCD monitor, made by Apple, Dell, or other brands, I will probably be able to manually adjust the display for Gamma 1.8, under Snow Leopard.
    I was posing this question about using Gamma 2.2 because if I could color correct for pre press with the 2.2 setting, I could continue to use my old Apple 17" CRT displays and also any web content I create will preview closer in color, on PCs as they will on my Mac.  Maybe my review PDFs will view with similar color on my customers PCs if I work with a 2.2 Gamma setting and instead of 1.8.  For now I know I will keep my printers happy if I continue to work with a monitor that has a 1.8 Gamma setting and a 6500 color temperature setting.  If that must continue to be the standard for pre press, then I will need to get an IPS based LCD monitor that will allow me to adjust in the 1.8 Gamma range while booted in Snow Leopard.

  • PSE 8: any color correction controls like RGB as in Photoshop?

    I used to have Photoshop 7 and often used the RGB controls to make color corrections.
    Now I have Elements 8 and I miss having RGB controls.
    Is there a way in PSE 8 I can simply adjust R, G, and B individually like I've been used to?
    If not, what is the closest substitute in PSE 8?

    There are no channel specific correction available but host of other things you can try are:
    Under Enhance Menu you have all those Auto operations to correct all automatically.
    Apart from this there are Enhance->Adjust Color and under Adjust Lighting.
    You can also try Adjustment layer under Layer->New Adjustment layer after creating a layer or duplicating your original one and check if it helps
    Thanks,
    Garry

  • Color correcting in Premiere or Photoshop?

    I'm new to Premiere and want to color correct some footage. I'm also new to color correcting. Am I better off learning to color correct my footage in Premiere or should I bring it into Photoshop to do it there?
    Thanks.

    A dedicated color correction app is on its way, maybe CS6. However, we find using the fast color corrector and the three way color corrector in PP quite effective for the basic primary/secondary color correction we do. Gotta watch your scopes though (waveform/vectorscope at the very least). Creative Cow has some tutorials on basic color correction. Here's one, but you'll have to dig around for the others by Andrew Devis. Again, don't do any color correction without checking your scopes.
    http://library.creativecow.net/devis_andrew/Color-Correction-2_Premiere-Pro/1
    http://library.creativecow.net/devis_andrew/Color-Correction-4_Secondary-Colour-Correction /1

  • Color Correcting in Photoshop

    I know everyone has a different method of color correcting their photos. I have a way of doing this, but I was wondering if there was a "standard" way of color correction? Can anyone point me to any online resources or books I can find at the library to do this properly? Thank you.

    In Levels, Opt+clicking while dragging the end points are very useful to set black and white end points in the Histogram.
    In Curves, middle adjustments control gamma/brightness/contrast. A lot of people also correct color in Curves, but I rarely do.
    In the Info pallet, if you can get the black/neutral/white points to display near equal numbers -- 0,0,0 128,128,128, 255,255,255 for example -- most of your color correcting will already be done.
    Selective Color (set to Absolute) is also very useful to learn about to pick a color (like red, for example) and work on skin tone. Selecting Black here (and neutraling the Black numbers is also a major part of color balancing photos.
    Working in 16-bit, Adjustment Layers is also recommended...

  • Camera Raw 5.5 VS Adobe Lightroom (color correction)

    Hi, does somebody know if discarding the advantage of making layers of Photoshop, is the Adobe Lightroom color correction controls superiors to the CameraRaw PS Interface correction controls ??? I mean for color correction purposes is Adobe Lightroom  better tan PS's  camera raw interface ???? because for me both controls seem to be pretty much the same thing,  does anyone know something about it ??
    Thank you in advance !

    RicardoAngelo wrote:
    I mean for color correction purposes is Adobe Lightroom  better tan PS's  camera raw interface ???? because for me both controls seem to be pretty much the same thing,  does anyone know something about it ??
    Both Camera Raw (most recent version) and Lightroom (most recent version) share the EXACT same processing pipeline...however, there are subtle differences in usability. For example, ACR 5.6 has a Point Curves Editor...Lightroom doesn't. Lightroom has a powerful capability to control output size and resolution which Camera Raw doesn't have...
    Bottom line is they are two horses of a different color but each is capable of performing the same tricks...so use whichever app allows you o accomplish what you need to do in the shortest and easiest process...

  • Color Correction for Web

    This is sort of a generic post questions. I am working on a project for the web. My final output will be to Digibeta. How do others approached color correcting in this situation? Being the computer monitors generally have such different characteristics than a traditional TV. In the past I correct as if I was going to air but this sometimes makes the online videos over saturated and contrasty. I realize there is really no web standard yet but wonder if anyone out there does a lot of web stuff that has any tips.

    sRGB is the recommended color space for internet application.< </div>
    You'd need to provide some documentation to support that statement.
    sRGB is not necessarily meaningful beyond photographic applications. sRGB was designed to roughly reproduce color regardless of local profiling. The sRGB standard was created in 1996 to, among other things, create a smaller number of colors to increase the likelihood of correct reproduction in printing photographs, The mere presence of Microsoft on the list of supporting companies is reason enough to be skeptical.
    http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleI d=67719
    When an RGB image from a high-end scanner or other device is imported into an SRGB environment, however, some color information is lost. What SRGB offers is a lowest-common-denominator view of images in business applications and on Web sites.< </div>
    This from the wiki:
    As the recommended color space for the Internet, sRGB should be used for editing and saving all images intended for publication to the WWW. Images intended for professional printing via a fully color-managed workflow, e.g., prepress output sometimes use another color space such as Adobe RGB (1998), which allows for a wider gamut.
    Images intended for the Internet and created in one of the other color spaces may be converted to sRGB when editing, using a suitable editing program, e.g., Paint Shop Pro or Adobe Photoshop; ideally, the original non-sRGB file should be saved and the conversion to sRGB done on a copy, as some loss of image information occurs when converting to another color space.
    Due to the standardization of sRGB on the Internet, on computers, and on printers, many low- to medium-end consumer digital cameras and scanners use sRGB as the default (or only available) working color space. Used in conjunction with an inkjet printer, an sRGB image produces what is often regarded as satisfactory for home use. However, consumer-level camera LCDs are typically uncalibrated, meaning that even though the image is being labelled as sRGB, one can't conclude that the image is color-accurate on the LCD.
    The two dominant programming interfaces for 3D graphics, OpenGL and Direct3D, have both incorporated sRGB. OpenGL 2.1 incorporates sRGB textures first introduced by the EXTtexturesRGB extension. OpenGL's EXTframebuffersRGB extensionsupports rendering into framebuffers assuming either a linear or sRGB color space. DirectX 9 supports sRGB textures and rendering into sRGB surfaces using Direct3D.<
    bogiesan

  • Secondary Color Correction layer not working in .look file

    I needed to edit an image for continuity reasons so I exported a .dpx frame from that section of my premiere pro project and worked on it in speedgrade.  In the workflow I have set for myself, it is best to apply the look in after effects using the "apply color lut" function.  Unfortunately, the secondary color correction layer does not apply, but other layers such as primary will. 

    Hi ACD,
    After Effects and Photoshop CS6 take .Looks via the LUT engine. That indeed allows for using primaries with low mid high differentiation and should yield really good results.
    Secondaries can be expressed in a LUT as well, but I would typically not recommend using them when you want to integrate .Looks with your After Effects workflow. Here's why:
    - a LUT is never as precise as you'd want it to be for something as complex as secondary color grading - a LUT is always based on interpolation (as opposed to applying the effect in SpeedGrade - there it's all native, no interpolation at all)
    - For a good key you would typically use the denoise and the blur function in the secondaries. Both (by nature) don't translate at all into a LUT, so you'd have to give up using these 2 important tools
    - For a lot of work you'd want the LUT to be accompanied by a mask. That's something that also can't be described in a LUT.
    Think of the LUT support for .Looks you created in SpeedGrade more as a really helpful tool for matching your comps to an overall look you design, not necessarily as the tool to apply a final grade.
    Hope this is helpful.
    Pat

  • Secondary Color Correction End Softness

    Here is a little something that has driven me insane across all versions (sans 8.1 which doesn't work on my machine)...
    Lets say you are using secondary color correction to mask out the sky above a mountain range - you know, like every single video tutorial on the subject does - so you get it dialed in as much as you can until you are left with that nasty pixel fakey line along where the heavens meet the earth which screams "hey look everyone this guy is faking the sky color here". But you don't admit defeat yet and you of course go for that trusty almost magical "End Softness" slider. You drag it a bit and see that it indeed does blend/feather/fix your SCC mask up quite nicely except one glaring problem. The End Softness adjustment has also feathered in the very far left/right outside edges of your clip/frame as well - rendering the usefulness of the secondary color correction ... well... completely non-useful.
    If it helps to clarify what I mean, the unwanted side effect I am describing also happens when you use Gaussian blur (premiere, photoshop, etc) but is remedied when you simply check the little "Repeat Edge Pixels" box.
    Anyone else ever have their secondary color correction attempts utterly deflated by this occurrence?

    I would imagine it is something to do with how softness or blurring samples surrounding pixels. When you reach the edge of the frame the edge pixels won't haven't neighbours all the way round for the effect to look at. As you said it is like the gaussian blur. Why there is no 'Repeat Edge Pixels' option, I don't know. I think you are possibly wasting your time asking the why on these forums. As long as you can get to the how, then be happy you achieve the desired outcome you are after

  • ? about image resolution/color correction when apple prints photo book

    My first time making a photo book. I color correct and sharpen all of my images in Adobe Lightroom 2 first. Then I save the jpegs and import into iPhoto to make a book. Is there an option for turning off auto color correction when the file is uploaded to apple for printing? Is there an accurate way to tell how the photos will print on the specific paper they use? Also, what print resolution should the photos be set to? Is 180 dpi enough? Thanks in advance.

    first read the Apple pages - http://www.apple.com/support/photoservices/preparation_tips/ - and all of its links
    Second - I suspect you will be disappointed. Based on reports on these forums almost everyone who uses iPhoto exclusively to preprocess photos is extremely happy with the results. very often people you over process their photos using a third party program (including Lightroom, Photoshop, etc) are unhappy because the printing process is optimized for point and shoot cameras and iPhoto processing - it is NOT a professional desktop book process
    There are no options re color correction - it is built in again aimed at sRGB, point and shoot cameras and iPhoto processing
    Plus there have been reported incompatibilities between iPhoto and Lightroom
    The print resolution is what it is - if it will be less than 180 dpi you will get a waarning - it can be greater
    The papers they print on are specified here - http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3412
    LN

  • Color correction in CS3

    Sorry for my newbness on this but I'm trying to make sure I'm not duplicating or undoing my work from one tool in another.  I recently finished going through Scott Kelby's CS3 for Digital Photographers book and I'm a bit confused on some aspects of color correction.  He starts out having you set WB, exposure, contrast settings, etc. in ACR.  Then when you move it to PS he has you use the curves panel to color correct.  Of course that entails using the black eye dropper and clicking on the blackest/darkest area of the photo, similar for the white dropper, and after a nice little trick to find the right spot......... an area for the midtone dropper. 
    The thing is I've noticed that once I make that first click with the black dropper, that nice contrast I had from ACR adjustments goes out the window and the photo brightens up a lot.  The final steps of putting 3 points on the curve and dropping the blacks end and raising the whites end brings it back a bit but I was thinking isn't setting the WB with the dropper in ACR already color correcting?  Even at the end of the book when he goes through his actual workflow using a provided .dng example he does all the ACR stuff and then moves to PS and uses the curves panel.

    Noel,
    I understand and respect your opinion about how you edit your images. To each his own.
    But the original poster said: Sorry for my newbness. . .
    So he's rather unfamiliar with Photoshop. Isn't it better to let new users learn a safer way to edit with the ability to return to their original image when they inadvertently make a hash of things? For the original poster and all the other inexperienced users that come to these forums, I like to let them know that there's the equivalent of a seat belt and an air bag that can save them a lot of grief.
    I deal with files from graphic artists that have used Photoshop for years and have never even hear of an adjustment layer, a layer comp or a Smart Object.
    They have files with 40 layers. 30 of which they have turned off since they have to make so many permanent uneditable filter adjustments with every slight variation of filter setting, just in case they might need a certain layer from 3 months ago when they tweaked one object in the file.  So many of their issues could have been solved with simple adjustment layers.
    I want people to understand the versatility of Photoshop and not just learn the same half dozen procedures and stop at that.
    You are absolutely correct that for some uses an adjustment layer isn't necessary, But the OP said that he had forgotten the part he had read about adjustment layers and how he definitely wants to start using them. After my post he remembered that there was another new thing about Photoshop that he wanted to learn. Hurrah!
    Perhaps in the future the OP will return to the forums to help out newbies like he once was himself.

  • Lightroom VS Camera Raw 5.5 (color correction)

    Hi, does somebody know if discarding the advantage of making layers of Photoshop, is the Adobe Lightroom color correction controls superiors to the CameraRaw PS Interface correction controls ??? I mean for color correction purposes is Adobe Lightroom  better tan PS's  camera raw interface ???? because for me both controls seem to be pretty much the same thing,  does anyone know something about it ??
    Thank you in advance !

    They seem the same because they are the same thing. Lightroom is basically an interface built around the camera raw processing core so you will get exactly the same results. The only thing really that you can do in Camera RAW that you can't in Lightroom is point curves (the interface simply doesn't expose them at the moment), which are almost never needed in raw conversion, except if you do special effects. I almost never use Photoshop anymore as Lightroom basically does all I need.
    P.S. the latest version of camera RAW is 5.6! Lightroom is at 2.6. The last number corresponds not by accident.

  • Underwater Color Correction--D800 Video

    I just came back from a dive trip to Cozumel and tried my new D800's video capabilities.
    I'm happy to report that, with color correction in FCP, the D800 does a great job without a red filter or lights.
    I didn't have much chance to experiment with this--too many other new things to try--but here's a quick preview.
    This is an uncorrected frame shooting without lights, auto white balance and programed exposure and shutter speed in about 40 feet of water (sunny day topside):
    I did a quick and dirty color correction using the three way color correction tool in FCP.  Not surprisingly, the corrections added red:
    The final looks great to me:
    I also tested use of the Magic Filter for a few dives.  I did not get better resuls, and worse, I had to do a lot of color correction on my stills to make them usable.
    This may be of limited interest to those who don't dive, but I was really happy to see that I could dive and do both stills and video without a filter and still restore with FCP the reds, oranges and yellows lost below 15 or so feet.

    For shallow water, auto level seems to work pretty well. 
    I used auto levels in Photoshop Elements 11 for most of these shots.
    https://www.facebook.com/friends/requests/?ref=tn&fcref=ffb#!/roy.yumori/photos_albums
    The manta ray is at 50 ft and is from a freeze frame from a video.  There is almost no red.  So it is too blue.  I used auto levels in Premiere Pro CC and it was better than the original, but not great.

Maybe you are looking for