PI 7.11: IDoc Message mapping

Hi there,
I'm currently working on a graphical message mapping using IDoc HRMD_A06 as source structure (HR master data transferred via PFAL).
In my result structure I have to fill a field CostCenter with the following logic:
If field KOSTL (cost center) is filled in node E1P0315, map this field to CostCenter in result structure, otherwise take KOSTL of node E1P0001.
The end date (ENDDA) has to be '99991231' in each case.
This is how the result structure looks like:
<e>                       [1...1]
  <CostCenter>            [1...1]
</e>
This is the simplified source structure:
<E1PLOGI SEGMENT="1">
  <E1PITYP SEGMENT="1">                        [0...n]
     <E1P0001 SEGMENT="1">                     [0...n]
       <INFTY>0001</INFTY>                     [0...1]
       <ENDDA>99991231</ENDDA>                 [0...1]
       <KOSTL>0000012345</KOSTL>               [0...1]
    </E1P0001>
  </E1PITYP>
  <E1PITYP SEGMENT="1">                        [0...n]
    <E1P0315 SEGMENT="1">                      [0...n]
      <INFTY>0315</INFTY>                      [0...1]
      <ENDDA>99991231</ENDDA>                  [0...1]
      <KOSTL>0000024001</KOSTL>                [0...1]
    </E1P0315>
  </E1PITYP>
</E1PLOGI>
How can I do the check if field KOSTL of node E1P0315 is null?
I've tried an existence check for the whole node (E1P0315->exists), but then it fails, because all E1PITYP nodes are processed.
I hope my problem is clear to you.
Would it be better to use another mapping type?
As I'm an ABAP developer, I would of course prefer some lines of code to this graphical drag&drop thing.
Thanks in advance!

Cheers, guys!
I did it now like that:
http://www.abload.de/image.php?img=mappingflknz.jpg
Click on the image to enlarge it!
The logic is as following (ABAP Pseudo-code ):
IF 0315_KOSTL and 0315_ENDDA are populated.
  IF 0315_ENDDA equals '99991231'.
    map 0315_KOSTL to Cost_Center.
  ENDIF.
ELSE.
  IF 0001_KOSTL and 0001_ENDDA are populated.
    IF 0001_ENDDA equals '99991231'.
      map 0001_KOSTL to Cost_Center.
    ENDIF.
  ENDIF.
ENDIF.
Is that a good way to do that mapping?
Do I also have to use the removeContexts function or is it ok like that?
Could I also do that with an ABAP mapping program?
Thanks in advance!

Similar Messages

  • IDoc to IDOC, Message Mapping settings

    Hi!
    I am going to implement IDoc to IDOC scenario.
    The IDOC should be send from SAP ECC 6.0 system, client 100 to the same system in client 200 via SAP XI.
    I have chosen the message type MATMAS05.
    Questions
    - What is the minimal message scenario (MATMAS:MATMAS05 to MATMAS.MATMAS05) in message  mapping?
    - when I change some mapping attributes do I need to activate the other related objects (e.g. Interface Mapping, etc.)?
    My problem is that the IDOC will be received in SAP XI, but has the following error:
    Error: must node 'E1MARAM' failed in structue MATMAS05
    How can i correct this error?
    Thank you very much!
    regards
    Holger

    Hi Holger,
    >    * What is the minimal message scenario (MATMAS:MATMAS05 to MATMAS.MATMAS05) in message >mapping?
    No Mapping at all or a direct 1:1 connection of all corresponding fields.
    >    * when I change some mapping attributes do I need to activate the other related objects (e.g. Interface >Mapping, etc.)?
    You only have to activate objects that you changed - so no.
    From the error I guess that a node in the target structure is not created although the idoc-definition states it as mandatory.
    Do you really need the mapping? Does the incoming IDoc also miss the Node?

  • How to handle the source text length exceed more than target text length size in Message mapping  PI 7.31

    I have a File to IDOC Message Mapping Scenario:
    Source Field                         Targefield
    Communiication Address-(Email ID)                                    E1EDK2 - TDLINE
    Source Field length: 1/80                                                                               target Field length: Char\70
    Mapping Condition:
    Note: TDFORMAT =  ‘=’ (Long Line), may need to create 2 TDLINE fields depending on length of text
    So give the Solution for handling text Length exceed than target field lenght Using TDLNE and TDFORMAT......
    Guide me  and give Suggestions to achive this.

    Hi ,
    Below is the generic sol for your problem .Graphical mappings wont workout for your problem while using sub string .
    Input -->Input string
    Length -->length of TDLINE
    MESSAGE_V1,V2,V3,V4....depends on how many TDLINES you expect .Here I have taken 4 .
    public void SplitbyLength(String[] Input, String[] Length, ResultList MESSAGE_V1, ResultList MESSAGE_V2, ResultList MESSAGE_V3, ResultList MESSAGE_V4, Container container) throws StreamTransformationException{
    int lengthVal = Integer.parseInt(Length[0]);
    int InpLenVal ;
    for(int i=0;i<Input.length;i++)
    InpLenVal  =Input[i].length() ;
    if (InpLenVal<=lengthVal)
    MESSAGE_V1.addValue(Input[i].substring(0));
    MESSAGE_V2.addValue(ResultList.SUPPRESS);  
    MESSAGE_V3.addValue(ResultList.SUPPRESS);  
    MESSAGE_V4.addValue(ResultList.SUPPRESS);  
    else if ((InpLenVal>lengthVal) && (InpLenVal <= (lengthVal*2)))
    MESSAGE_V1.addValue(Input[i].substring(0,lengthVal));
    MESSAGE_V2.addValue(Input[i].substring(lengthVal,InpLenVal));
    MESSAGE_V3.addValue(ResultList.SUPPRESS);  
    MESSAGE_V4.addValue(ResultList.SUPPRESS);  
    else if ((InpLenVal>(lengthVal*2)) && (InpLenVal <= (lengthVal*3)))
    MESSAGE_V1.addValue(Input[i].substring(0,lengthVal));
    MESSAGE_V2.addValue(Input[i].substring(lengthVal,(lengthVal*2)));
    MESSAGE_V3.addValue(Input[i].substring((lengthVal*2),InpLenVal));
    MESSAGE_V4.addValue(ResultList.SUPPRESS);  
    else if (Input[i].length()>(lengthVal*3)  && (InpLenVal <= (lengthVal*4)))
    MESSAGE_V1.addValue(Input[i].substring(0,lengthVal));
    MESSAGE_V2.addValue(Input[i].substring(lengthVal,(lengthVal*2)));
    MESSAGE_V3.addValue(Input[i].substring((lengthVal*2),(lengthVal*3)));
    MESSAGE_V4.addValue(Input[i].substring((lengthVal*3),InpLenVal));
    else if (Input[i].length()>(lengthVal*4) )
    MESSAGE_V1.addValue(Input[i].substring(0,lengthVal));
    MESSAGE_V2.addValue(Input[i].substring(lengthVal,(lengthVal*2)));
    MESSAGE_V3.addValue(Input[i].substring((lengthVal*2),(lengthVal*3)));
    MESSAGE_V4.addValue(Input[i].substring((lengthVal*3),(lengthVal*4)));
    Regards
    Venkat

  • Seeburger message mapping

    Guys,
        I  have to map A_850_V4010 to IDOC ORDERS05. I was trying to leverage the the message mapping Seeburger delivers as part of
    the B2BContent-A_850_V4010_to_I_ORDERS_05
    This is what I did ,
    a) I have imported the ORDERS05  idoc definition fromECC system into my name space. 
    b) I also imported the 850_v4010 from Seeburger Message catalogue  by importing XML_850_V4010.xsd.
    Now, when I try to copy the A_850_V4010_to_I_ORDERS_05 that into my namepsace, the XI  asks whether I want to import the Source Message LIST from http://seeburger.com/b2b  as well as ORDERS05  from http://seeburger.com/b2b .
    My questions are
    1)How is the external defintion done ? Is it like step a) and b) described above?  or, does Seeburger provide the XSD for ORDERS05 idoc? 
    2)  how do I make sure that  ORDERS05 that I got from my  ECC system is  the same structure as that of ORDERS05 in
    Seeburger?   besides going through individual fields . Ideally, I would like to use the ORDERS05 I imported in step a) as the traget message.  With  message maaping copy it seems step a) and b) is  not  relevant.
    3) I  also need to map SHPMNT05 idoc to A_856_V4010. Since Seeburger doesn't have it in the mapping list ( the  one they have is DELVRY03_To_A_856_V4010) , the mapping will be the same as the DELVRY03_To_A_856_V4010  EXCEPT that I need to get
    TKNUM  from the SHPMNT05 header. I am wondering whether Manually creating the mapping is the only way, or  is there anyway I can leverage the DELVRY03_To_A_856_V4010 mapping? Has anyone had the experience where they had to change the source Idoc but, still been able to leverage the existing mapping . I just need to change the mapping from E1EDL20 - VBELNin Delvry03  to E1EDT20-TKNUM in SHPMNT05 idoc - this will be mapped to  D_396 in S_BSN segment.
    Thanks !!

    Hey
    >>1)How is the external defintion done ? Is it like step a) and b) described above? or, does Seeburger provide the XSD for ORDERS05 idoc?
    Seeburger provides XSD's for all the major EDI structures,but somehow when i was trying to import the XSD'd and Message mapping into my own SWCV,i was getting the same issue as you have so i ended up copying them manually.it works fine after that.
    >>I am wondering whether Manually creating the mapping is the only way, or is there anyway
    DELVRY03 IDOC is different from SHPMT05 IDOC,even i had to use SHPMNT05 IDOC message mapping and since it didn't come with seeburger,i designed my own message mapping manually.
    >>experience where they had to change the source Idoc but, still been able to leverage the existing mapping
    I tried this,it doesn't works properly,gives you issues at the time of activating the mapping.
    My advice would be to go ahead and do all the steps manually,i had put in lots of effort and time but ended up doing major parts of mappings manually,the mapping you get from SeeBurger is just the base/generic mapping and is a lot different from the actual mapping required for Business partners.
    Thanx
    Aamir
    Edited by: Aamir Suhail on May 6, 2008 8:33 PM

  • Doubt in fields - message mapping (file 2 idoc scenario)

    while doing message mapping in file 2 idoc scenario, i could not able find the values for some field names
    ( i am following this wiki help
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/11/fileToIDOC& )
    cremas04 idoc
    vendorNo LIFNR
    vendor name Name1
    Pur_org   ? ( I could not able locate field with the similar desc in idoc MT side)
    Company code  ?
    Acc_Grp  ?
    Search term MCOD1
    Address ADRNR
    City ORT01
    Pin_code PSLTZ
    could you help me out with this?
    Message was edited by: praba
            praba

    hi,
    I got the answer.

  • In Idoc bundling ...message mapping not found

    Hi XI Friends..
    In my File to Idoc scenario..i want to send multiple IDOCs from the XI without a BPM .
    I am following blog by Michal.
    <a href="///people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change:///people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change
    I have xsd for source ..so i created one external definition .and message interface for outbound.
    following the above blog by michal..
    i imported  idoc ..and i exported that idoc into xsd and i changed the occurance of idoc to unbounded and again imported as external definition.
    i created  the message mapping between these two external definitions.and tested ..
    As in michal 's blog..
    In Interface mapping..i given source and target interface as standard idoc.and clicked on Read interface then i am not finding  the message mapping created in previous step..
    i refreshed cache also..
    please guide me.....
    regards
    ram

    Hi bavesh...
    thank you so much for very your quick responses..
    i got xsd as source..based on xsd i created external definition for source xsd  and  i created outbound interface based on source external deifinition <b>MI_OUT_WearUnits</b>.
    and i imported Idoc and exported as xsd and changed occurance to unbounded and again imported as external definition.
    i did mapping between these two external definitions.
    and i selected standard idoc for source and target interface for interface mapping  and given message mapping of previous step.
    In ID
    sender agreement :
                    sender service :BS_external
                    sender interface :<b>MI_OUT_WearUnits</b>
    receiver agreement:
                  receiver service :R/3
                  receiver interface :  standard Idoc
    Interface determination:
    sender service :BS_external
    sender interface :<b>MI_OUT_WearUnits</b>
    reciever service :R/3
    and clicked create
    inbound interface : Standard IDOc
    i am not getting Interface mapping which i created in IR.
    i tried Enhance interface determination also..
    please guide me....
    waiting for your help.
    regards
    ram

  • Error in message mapping of IDoC Invoic02

    Hi,
    i have imported the invoic02 idoc into PI system. i have mapped the required field os idoc with standard XSD which is imported through ED. I'm able to most of the fields with idoc and XSD. however, some of the node in xsd are repaeting.
    so here the part of xsd with which i'm mapping.
    (first_node)ListOfTaxSummary                      0..1
    (second_parent_node)TaxSummary                   1..unboubed
    (child_node) tax                                 1..1
    (element)TaxAmount                                0..1
    (element)TaxCategoryCoded                         0..1
    here the i have mapped  ListOfTaxSummary    with the idoc node E1EDS01
    TaxSummary  with E1EDS01
    tax with E1EDS01.
    i tried all possibilities with different mapping. but i'm able to get the tax node under taxsummary with the element. the problem its been repeated as  E1EDS01 idoc repeats.
    please help us in solving this problem.
    Thanks
    Kind regards,
    Lalitkumar.

    Could someone tell me is there any relation for the above error in XML messages and to the message mapping?
    The error mentions that you have used an IDOC in your mapping program which is not found in the ESR....you need to check if the IDOC is present in the ESR and is present under the correct SWCV.
    Once you have done the check do some dummy change to the mapping and activate it (if in DEV) and then check the CACHE.

  • Error in Message Mapping "Target message IDOC: ORDRSP.ORDERS02 does not exi

    Hi,
    I have joined newly to the team.
    When I tried to open one message mapping it throwinf follwing error...
    "Target message IDOC: ORDRSP.ORDERS02 does not exist in software component version ID: 44423362454456485465..
    Check whether the software component version ID: 44423362454456485465 is in Enterprise Service Repository. Import this version if necessary"
    Is there any impact because of which in the message flow?
    In my case some of the messages are failing with mapping error "runtime exception occured during application mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_SUS2MMOrderResponse_; java.lang.NullPointerException: while trying to invoke the method java.util.Map.get(java.lang.Object) of an object loaded from field com.sap.aii.map`"
    And some of the messages are processed sucessfully and they also using the same mapping program 'SUS2MMOrderResponse'.
    Could someone tell me is there any relation for the above error in XML messages and to the message mapping?
    Regards
    Baskaran K

    Could someone tell me is there any relation for the above error in XML messages and to the message mapping?
    The error mentions that you have used an IDOC in your mapping program which is not found in the ESR....you need to check if the IDOC is present in the ESR and is present under the correct SWCV.
    Once you have done the check do some dummy change to the mapping and activate it (if in DEV) and then check the CACHE.

  • Message mapping challenge in IDOC to EDI scenario

    Dear PI message mapping experts,
    I'm a newbie in PI and facing a mapping problem using graphical message mapping.
    I'm in an IDOC (INVOIC.INVOICE02) to FILE (EDI) scenario.
    Here after is the mapping i need to perform :
    Source structure IDOC :
    <E1EDKA1> (0..99)
       <NAME1> A </NAME1>  (0..1)
       <NAME2> B </NAME2>  (0..1)
       <NAME3> C </NAME3>  (0..1)
       <NAME4> D </NAME4>  (0..1)
    </E1EDKA1>
    Target structure :
    <AccountingCustomerParty>  (1..1)
       <Party> (0..1)
          <PartyName> (0..unbounded)
              <Name>A</Name> (1..1)
          </PartyName>
          <PartyName>
              <Name>B</Name>
          </PartyName>
          <PartyName>
              <Name>C</Name>
          </PartyName>
          <PartyName>
              <Name>D</Name>
          </PartyName>
       </Party>
    </AccountingCustomerParty>
    I know i have to play with context and queues with stanard function or UDF but cannot succeed to do it.
    Could you please help me ?
    Thanks in advance,
    Alysee

    One approach out of available few ways to implement this:
    NAME1 - Exists - CreateIf - PartyName[0]
    NAME2 - Exists - CreateIf - PartyName[1] (Create deuplicate segment)
    NAME3 - Exists - CreateIf - PartyName[2] (Create deuplicate segment)
    NAME4 - Exists - CreateIf - PartyName[3] (Create deuplicate segment)
    Srikanth Srinivasan

  • XML message mapping considering idoc message variant

    Dear Experts,
    I am very new to PI. I am working on a scenario where I need to map VGON_OUT xml message from SNC system to ORDRSP.ORDERS05 inbound idoc of ECC 6.0 system.
    The issue is :
    In the inbound partner profile in ECC there are two ordersp message types. one with message variant SMI and another without any message variant.
    Both of them are using different process codes for processing.
    So my question is how to map the VGON_out xml message in PI?
    Please note: the key difference is the idoc message variant.
    There is no way to merge both of these message types as their function is serving two different purposes.
    I have attached the xml file and the screenshot of the partner profile here.
    Any suggestion or reference link or document would be deeply appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.
    Praty

    Hi Pratyusa,
    Did you try with different partner profiles for each ORDRSP?
    Regards,
    Krupa

  • Need Help with Message Mapping in PI 7.1 - JDBC to IDOC

    I have an outgoing SQL function that sends multiple rows of data for use in creating an IDOC in ECC. I am trying to key the creation of new IDOCs (already did the maxOccurs trick to the IDOC definition) based on a field in the JDBC return data...
    JDBC Message Format...
    SEGNAM - TRANS_ID - MATERIAL - VKORG...ETC
    MARA -  00001 - 1234 - <space> - ...
    MARC -  00001 - 1234 - VK01 - ...
    MARA - 00002 - 9876 - <space> - ...
    MAKT - 00002 - 9876 - <space> - material description - ...
    Each time there is a new TRANS_ID, I need to indicate a new IDOC in the message mapping. I have tried all kinds of combinations of TRANS_ID --> dropContext --> splitValue and TRANS_ID --> collapseContext --> splitValue, but nothing has worked.
    Has anyone done this kind of message map (without any BPM please)?
    Thanks,
    Nathan

    Hello Nathan,
    For this one, you have to play with contexts.
    row 1 SEGNAM = MARA, TRANS_ID = 1, MATNR = 123...
    row 2 SEGNAM = MARC, TRANS_ID = 1, MATNR = 123, WERKS = PL01...
    row 3 SEGNAM = MARA, TRANS_ID = 2, MATNR = 987
    This also depends on the occurrence of the parent node. example, if I want MATNR to be populated, the logic would be like
    ex:
    IDOC1..unbounded) (The logic is the already provided in an earlier response)
    -->MATNR (1..1)
    MATNR --------> removeContext ----------------> FormatByExample --> MATNR
    TRANS_ID --> removeContext --> splitByValue:ValueChange --> /
    If the rows are not in order of trans_id, then you need to incorporate sorting into the logic above.
    Hope this helps,
    Mark

  • Message Mapping - IDOC to http

    Hi ,
    I am creating Message mapping for IDOC to Http scenario.
    In which i have the following requirement. For a partner Role in segment E1BPDLVPARTNER we need to get the Address_No value
    and then with that we need to get the address from segment E1BPADR1
      <E1BPDLVPARTNER>
          <PARTN_ROLE>AG</PARTN_ROLE>
         <PARTNER_NO>0007745359</PARTNER_NO>
      </E1BPDLVPARTNER>
      <E1BPDLVPARTNER SEGMENT="1">
        <PARTNER_NO>0007745359</PARTNER_NO>
        <ADDRESS_NO>0000267775</ADDRESS_NO>
      </E1BPDLVPARTNER>
       <E1BPDLVPARTNER SEGMENT="1">
         <PARTNER_NO>0007759123</PARTNER_NO>
         <ADDRESS_NO>9000001048</ADDRESS_NO>
      </E1BPDLVPARTNER>
      <E1BPADR1 SEGMENT="1">
         <ADDR_NO>000075</ADDR_NO>
         <NAME>BRIDT HOSPITAL INC</NAME>
       </E1BPADR1>
       <E1BPADR1 SEGMENT="1">
         <ADDR_NO>00775</ADDR_NO>
          <NAME>BRIDGA</NAME>
       </E1BPADR1>
       <E1BPADR1 SEGMENT="1">
        <ADDR_NO>05</ADDR_NO>
        <NAME>BRIDL INC</NAME>
       </E1BPADR1>
    Can you provide inputs on this.
    Thanks,
    Vishal

    For the Address No 0007745359 in E1BPDLVPARTNER we need to go to the E1BPADR1 segment and get the address from
    it and populate the target. Also the data above is test one
    Me a bit confused about your requirement!
    In your structure Partner_Number is having the value 0007745359
    What i get is you have to check for PartnerNo in E1BPDLVPARTNER and if that value matches then go to E1BPADR1 segment and get the Address......but to go to a particular E1BPADR1 you need to check for some field within it.....
    Your mapping logic will be something like:
    PartNum/ AddrNum -->
                                  --->equalS --->
    Constant(0007745359)
                                                              ----> And ----> IfWithoutElse --->    Target
    Field_of_E1BPADR1 (validation logic) -->             Then(Field_of_E1BPADR1)
    Context of PartNum/ AddrNum to be raised and also that of Field_of_E1BPADR1 (the one on which validation is imposed.
    If possible get some more details from your technical lead on how to select the E1BPADR1 ...
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

  • Java heap space error occured during message mapping of FILE to IDOC

    hello Friends,
                          I am trying to do the message mapping for File to Idoc scenario.
    Idoc which I am using is HRMD_A.HRMD_A06 and infotype which I want to update is 14. I am trying to map the message type which I hav created for infotype 14 with the IDOC
    Its very simple scenerio but  every time I try to save the mapping before activating it I get an error:
    Java heap space
    Internal problem occurred (INTERNAL_PROBLEM)
    Java heap space.
                I am not able to figure out what possibly is the problem wheather its from my end or the BASIS end.
    Kindly help.
    Regards,
    Lokesh

    As the server probably survives (you restart your Integration Builder and can probably connect immediately), the problem will be on your side (client). Did you add one or more large xml-test-instances to the mapping ? If yes, delete them, because they lower the performance and can make problems. If not, then this is a strange problem. Even if the Idoc structure is complex, the mapping object itself cannot be that large.Is this problem only with this one mapping ?
    CSY
    Edited by: Christian Sy on Mar 9, 2010 6:26 AM

  • IDoc and Message Mapping

    Hi,
    I have a question.
    In a idoc to file scenario,idoc as a sender,.If the idoc is updated in r/3 system due to some change request after we finish the mesage mapping,what steps need to be followed to ensure the correct mapping.
    Do we need to change the mapping.
    Regards,
    Haritha

    Hello,
    if just the values of your IDoc changed you don't have to change
    your message mapping.
    If the structure has changed you have to reload the metadata (idx2)
    and the IDoc in your Repository and then update your message mapping with reloading your IDoc.
    Regards
    Patrick

  • Issue with IDOC occurence and SeeBurger message mapping

    Hey Guys
    While developing a EDI 850 to IDOC scenario i came across this issue with pre-delivered Seeburger mapping(A_850_V4010_to_I_ORDERS05).
    I actually need to post multiple IDOC's to SAP system in the same message so i changed the IDOC occurence to unbounded and re-imported that as a .XSD file in Integration repository.
    Earlier the pre-delivered message mappings provided by SeeBurger(under SEEBURGER_HIGH-TECH, 1.7.1 of seeburger) was working fine for me since i was posting only 1 IDOC but now the mapping is failing as the IDOC occurence has changed(unbounded).
    Is there a way we can do some settings on SeeBurger server or Bic so that we can use the pre-delivered mapping for Multiple IDOC's as well?
    I just want to make sure before i start off with doing whole of the mapping manually.
    Thanx
    Aamir

    Thanx for the input guys
    @Deepthi.
    Doing whole of mapping manualy is definitely the last option but i m looking for ways to re-use the pre-delivered SeeBurger mapping.
    >>Seeburger Mapping is only just to convert XML to EDI and EDI to XML.
    Bic mapping designer does this,i m dealing with message mapping of XI(convert source to target) not Bic designer right now,and Bic does more than just XML to EDI and vice versa,it handles other industry standards too.
    @Jens
    >>The XI message mappings from Seeburger in the Industry solutions are mapping templates
    Yeah,but the mapping template i have deals with 850 to ORDERS05,when i change IDOC occurence and re-import it back in Integration repository,it doesn't stays as ORDERS05,it has to be changed to user defined message interface(in my case MI_ORDERS05) so i m unable to use 850 to ORDERS05 template.
    @Seshagiri
    >>Open the Seeburger SWCV From the IR--goto External Def---Select the right one and copy it and paste it in notepad.
    Changing the occurence is not an issue,i want to re-use the pre-delivered mapping in Integration repository,which is not working.
    Looks like i need to do it manually
    Thanx
    Aamir

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem with 10g and 9i in one machine

    Hello, I installed 10g in a pc where 9i is already installed. It was installed in its own home directory. My problem is that when I try to access it using Enterprise Manager, or Sql*Plus, or Developer, I get either the service name could not be resol

  • Keep white spaces and carriage returns?

    I'm viewing a column -VARCHAR2(4000)- in a standard report column. The column value contains white spaces and carriage returns. I put "white-space:pre;" in CSS Style, but it still skips carriage returns... What can I do to view white spaces and carri

  • Lots of my music will no longer play after latest update

    Hello, I have a lot of music that will no longer play in my iTunes after the last update.  it doesnt happen with all my music, but a lot of it, and as far as i can tell, movies and tv shows are still good.  when i click on the song, it just skips for

  • Reconcilation procedure

    hi  friends can  anybody  pls  come up with what is "<b>reconcilation</b>" and <b>standard procedure</b> to do  reconcilation thanks in advance venkat

  • When trying to view youtube I get this message"an error occured loading this content" any ideas why?

    When I try to view YouTube content I get the message "an error occured loading this content."  This did not happen until recently.  Any ideas why?