Plan-driven proc. Simultaneously access to one SC from some XML messages.

Hi SRM gurus.
We've implemented plan-driven procurement scenario and have caught an error. I explain error on example:
ERP generates via PI 5 XLM messages for update 5 positions of SRM SC. When the first XML locks SC for update, the second XML trying to lock SC and cannot do it and therefore get out an error. When i restart processing XML marked as error manually all works fine.
So question is - How to ensure step by step processing XML messages which belong to one ERP PR. I played with parameters in SMQR with XTBR* queue but it was unsuccessfully.
P.S. We've got some ABAP ideas about adding XML messages to separate queue based on ERP PR but it looks too hard.

Dear Poster,
As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
Best Regards,
SDN SRM Moderation Team

Similar Messages

  • Puttin the name of the file in one tag of the xml message

    Hi all,
    does anybody kowns how to put the name of the file in one tag of the xml message in the adapter, without using a java mapping to get the file name.
    Thanks.

    H Antonio,
    You can  use ASMA( Adapter Specific Message Attributes) for acccessing the file name, along with Dynamic Configuration. You can follow the following blog for that. If you do not want to use the same file name for the reciever, dont select the File Name check box.
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/11/10/xi-the-same-filename-from-a-sender-to-a-receiver-file-adapter--sp14
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sanjeev.

  • How can we call creen of one program from some other dynpro Program

    Hi,
    Is it possible to call a screen of one program from some other program as pop up or full scree.
    please give you input if it is possible.
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Praveen.

    Hi,
    But is there is any function module through we can call screen of some other program. PLease let me know if you are aware of that.
    Thanks

  • Simultaneous Access to one report

    Hello Everybody,
    How many simultaneous access of different DB can one report have?
    For example,how many users can access the same report at the same time?
    the edition of CR is 2008.

    Not much info to go on so I am assuming you Everyone has a local copy of Crystal Reports Designer installed and the reports are all stored on a local Server.
    There should not be a lock on the report, Each designer should open the report as a Temp copy, but they won't be able to save the report back to the shared folder.
    As for DB connections, each user has his own connection to the server. DB Client and DSN or how ever you are connecting must be installed on each users PC. If you are using more than one Data Source then use a subreport for each database server.
    Thank you
    Don

  • One IDOC to multiple XML messages

    Hi! I am using the graphical mapper in XI to map the SHPMNT03 IDOC to an XML message. The IDOC has a shipment node and potentially multiple delivery nodes, for example:
    E1EDT20
      - E1EDL20
      - E1EDL20
      - E1EDL20
    I need to create one XML message per E1EDL20 node. I figured I could do this in the mapper but when I execute the map for an IDOC with multiple E1EDL20 nodes, I get a 'Cannot cast 2 to boolean' error. The map executes fine when there is a single E1EDL20 in the IDOC.
    As always, help is very much appreciated and points awarded.
    Thx, Duncan

    Hi Duncan,
    Can you just check if this is what you have done,
    IR
    1. Message Mapping -- Occurence of the Destination message type ( file ) is unbounded
    2. Interface Mapping -- Occurence of the Destination Interface ( File ) is unbounded
    ID
    1. No sender communication channel , sender agreement
    2. Receiver communcation channel for FIle with appropriate FILE CONSTRUCTION MODE
    3. Receiver Determination  and Interface Determination with Sender Interface as the IDOC interface and Receiver Interface as the FILE INTERFACE.
    I think there is some misunderstanding on this front.
    Multimapping will work if you are trying to  do an IDOC to FILE with a 1:N split
    just check this and let me know if you ve missed something.
    Regards,
    Bhavesh

  • Accessing SAP Transaction screen from other application

    Hi Friends
    We have a requirement where we want to access a transaction screen from some other application.
    Is there any standard BAPI for doing this (R3 or CRM) ?
    Kindly help ....
    Best Regards

    Hello Pankaj,
    In CRM you can use Function Module TRANSACTION_CALL_VIA_RFC to open a transcation screen in another system. This FM takes RFC Target System and TCode as inputs and opens the transaction in the specified system (provided Logical System Name & RFC Connection has been properly made)
    If it is IC Web Client, you can use transaction Launcher to do the same, follow the blog created by Raja G for the same.
    The link to which I am providing underneath:
    /people/raja.g/blog/2007/01/24/displaying-r3-transaction-in-icwc-application
    Regards,
    Khushboo
    <b>Reward with points !</b>

  • Is there any way to call methods of one view from another

    Hi experts,
    I am new to webdynpro.I am having some requirement in which I need to call methods of one view from some other view of same component .So is there any way to do this.

    Dear Pradeep,
    This will solve your problem......( plz 1st read everything ..)
    There are 2 views  :
    i) Mandatory Attributes ' view(V1)
    ii) Button' s  View..(V2)
    1. Create a method in Component Controller.( M1).
    2. Goto V2 . In the Action Handler method of Button , call method  M1 of component controller.
    3. Write your Code in M1 instead of  V2 method.
    4. Create an EVENT ( E1 ) in component controller.
    5. Fire this event  from M1 before executing Action Code.
    6. Now  Add the event handler method of  E1 in  V1 ( i.e. Mandatory attributes view. )   ..........clear????? .. set "METHOD TYPE" = Event Handler. instead of  Method.
    7. In this event handler method in V1 , write the "check_mandatory_attribute_view" method.
    8. use necessary flags..
    Regards ,
    Aditya.

  • Can multiple LabVIEW programs simultaneously access the same NI-DAQmx hardware?

    I am developing a test station system that, in essence, runs several
    seperate LabVIEW programs simultaneously on the same computer, each
    controlling a different set of I/O channels on one shared set of NI
    DAQ hardware (analog and digital I/O PCI boards with external signal
    conditioning).
    I have already gotten a system like this running almost flawlessly
    using LabVIEW 6.1, NI-DAQmx 7.1 with traditional channels, and older
    E-series DAQ hardware. So long as two programs do not try to write to
    the same output channel simultaneously, everything works exactly as
    expected--I can even read from the same (named) channel simultaneously
    from more than one program. The only issue I have had is that if
    one
    of the compiled applications is closed (not just stopped, but closed)
    while others are still running, Windows XP (SP1) will bluescreen on a
    driver error. This is undesireable, but acceptable (though if there's
    a fix/workaround, I'd love to hear it).
    I am now building a similar system using mostly the same software
    (with an upgrade to LabVIEW 7.1), and I've noticed that the new
    M-series DAQ hardware seems to offer much more bang for the buck than
    old E-series hardware and its kin.
    My question is this: It appears that I/O on M-series hardware must be
    performed with new mx channels, with traditional channels not being an
    option. I am therefore wondering if I will be able to do this kind of
    multiple simultaneous access with mx channels, or if I must purchase
    the classic hardware and use traditional channels for this somewhat
    unorthodox application.
    (Incidentally, the multiple simultaneous program thing is a
    requirement for this system, as it is the only clean way to run
    multiple
    identical copies of the same complete program that only
    operate on different I/O channels, and re-doing the program from
    scratch is not an option.)

    Dear Anonymous,
    Thank you for contacting National Instruments.
    To address your question, I don't know if multiple simultaneous access with mx channels is possible, but I do not see why it wouldn't be. The best way to find out would be to test it. I don't have your program or hardware, so I'm pointing you to some Compatibility VIs. These are VIs that look exactly like Traditional DAQ VIs except that underneath they call the DAQmx driver instead of the Traditional DAQ driver. If your device works when you substitute these Compatibility VIs in for the Traditional DAQ VIs, then you'll know the M Series boards will work for you.
    Here is the link for information about the Compatibility VIs:
    http://digital.ni.com/softlib.nsf/954feaeea92d90918625674b00658b
    83/9d67f671bcc6850586256e630059308b?OpenDocument
    Let me know if you have any further questions or if this does not resolve your issue.
    Thanks again and have a great day!
    Chad AE
    Applications Engineer - National Instruments

  • Page should be accessed by one user at a time

    Hi friends,
    I have a new requirement where webpage should be accessed by one user at a time.Suppose if one user is using the page ,the other user should not be having the privilage to access tht page.NOw how to go about..If possibel pls help me with the code..
    Thanks in advance..
    Waiting for ur suggestion.

    Finally i am using a method..
    <script language="JavaScript">
      window.onbeforeunload = confirmExit;
      function confirmExit()
          document.LoginForm.action="next.php";
          document.LoginForm.submit();
        return "Are you want to exit this page?";
        return false;
    </script>
    </HEAD>
    <BODY onbeforeunload="confirmExit()">
    <form name="LoginForm">
    </form>
    </body>
    </html>I am using onbeforeunload ,so when ever the page is refreshed or user tries to move from the page i call function from tht i go to a page where i do file creation . when ever user access the page, simultaneously other users wiil be detained access for tht page..
    But the problem i am facing here is..whenever the user tries to change focus from the page a pop up comes up saying do u want to continue or not..if user press cancel actually the control has to remain in the same page but still the control is passed to the different page...
    pls advice on this..

  • SRM 7 PPS Classic Scenario with Plan Driven Procurement?

    Hello experts,  I want to know if the combination of  SRM 7 PPS Classic Scenario with Plan Driven Procurement is possible? or if there any limitation to consider? Our client needs to create purchase requisition in ERP -> send this purchase requisitions to SRM (as shopping carts) create bids - > quotations  - > create contract from accepted quotations and then from the contract we need to create purchase order but this one must be created in ERP (classic scenario) Someone has experimented the same situation? Best regards and thanks for your Help.
    Liam

    Hi Lima ,
    Classic scenario wont support PPS .
            - Stand alone and classic scenario not supported
            - Shopping cart renamed to Purchase Requisition
            - Shopping cart generate (pre)commitment in funds management
            - Contract can create Funds Reservation (Earmarked Funds) in Funds Management as a Guarantee
            - Goods Receipt and Invoice created in ERP
            - Mixed PO: PO with lines that works like contract lines, a PO can be created from these lines
            - PO created from contracts or mixed-PO is named call-off PO. Only is a new name, is a "normal" SRM      PO
            - Goods receipt possible in SRM only in "easy" cases
    Thanks & Regards
    Pradeep Kumar Dondeti

  • Plan driven procuremnt

    Hi,
    "Plan Driven Procurement" transfers Purchase requisitions created in the backend system(ERP) to SRM and subsequent processing takes place.
    Does the plan driven scenario also transfer Pur Req for services to the SRM system?
    The table V_T160EX allows to make settings only for material groups to be transferred to the SRM system.
    Regards,
    Vignesh

    Hi  Vignesh,
    In Plan drive procurement  - for direct material  external requirements can be transferrred from ECC 6.0
    thro' P.R (or) Thro' MRP .For this only profile is created in the table : V_T160EX for Material Group.
    Purchase requistion for service is not taken .
    You can do one thing if you are regularly using the same services -better allot one material number and then you can transfer the requirment.
    Regards
    G.Ganesh Kumar

  • Plan driven procurement error

    hai ,
    i have configured  plan driven procurement.i maintained tables v_t160pr,v_t160ex and run a report bbp_extreq_transfer.and later i have checked in smq1 where i find a sytem error like
    exception condition " partner_not_employee " raised
    can anyone please give the solution
    thanks and regards
    chakradhar

    hai jagadish,
    thank you very much for ur valuable solution.finally i got it .but i got one error.i had found that particular sc in bbp_pd transaction.but i wanted to see it in purchasers worklist.what are all the attributes i have to assign in the organisation for the particular user to get the sc.
    thanks and regards
    n.chakradhar

  • Limit multiple simultaneous access to part of PL SQL code

    Is there any provision in PL-SQL block by which some part of the PL SQL code can be restricted to be accessed by only one user at a time. Multiple request on the same part of the code will form a queue and will be executed one after the other.
    I am working on an application that generates unique number for each request from the database by performing MAX+1. In multiuser environment, same number is assigned to all the user requesting number from the same table. We have observed duplicate value error generated due to simultaneous click for generation of number and both getting the same number and being inserted in the column which is defined unique.
    Also pls. provide me some feasible solution apart from limiting simultaneous access to part of the code that generates number and updates the database.

    If the number is generated by sequence and by any chance that transaction is rolled back then that sequence number is lost. I want numbers without any missing numbers in the column. What about these sequence of events:
    1). A user gets a MAX + 1 value.
    2). Saves the record.
    3). Another user gets the next MAX + 1 value.
    4). Saves the record.
    5). User #1 then wants to delete his record.
    Then you have a gap in between that will never be filled up if you keep doing MAX + 1.
    Is this gap acceptable?
    Or that
    1). Delete of a saved record is not allowed by your application to avoid gaps.
    2). You have some extra logic (apart from MAX + 1 always), to re-assign these deleted slots to next person asking for the sequence.
    None of the above two sound reasonable.
    Even if you fill a previously deleted slot for the next sequence reauest, You will no longer will be able to order the records in the order they were created and a deleted slot could remain "free" for a extended period of time, during which you still have to deal with the gaps in your sequence generation logic.
    Is it worth considering using the Oracle sequence object instead?
    Someone might say, yes. What about you?

  • Intermittent error "Detected simultaneous access"

    Since updating our Service Desk appliance to version 7.0.3 we have had an intermittent error message when a technician is updating or changing incidents. The error reads "Detected simultaneous access. This Incident has been altered by another user and the contents are now updated. Review & re-submit to record your changes."
    There are no other users updating the incident at the time. After attempting to save the incident a few times it does succeed. Is anyone else seeing this?

    deaster,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
    posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Visit http://www.novell.com/support and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
    the other self support options and support programs available.
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
    correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
    Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
    http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
    and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Forums Team
    http://forums.novell.com

  • How to block one IP from accessing web mail

    Hi
    iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2
    Recently a hackers who is using a particular IP log in into our users webmail and start to send spam all over the world.
    FYI the user accounts use weak password, so that's why the hackers could log in easily.
    My question is could I block that hacker's IP (one particular IP) from logging into our webmail..?
    Thanks

    AbuIqbal wrote:
    iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2I suggest you upgrade.. or at least start planning on upgrading to a more recent release (e.g. Messaging Server 6.3). We aren't releasing any new patches/fixes for this release.
    Recently a hackers who is using a particular IP log in into our users webmail and start to send spam all over the world.Messaging Server 6.3 provides the metermaid utility which can be used to throttle the number of emails users send via webmail -- an example on how to do this with the UWC/Communications Express interface (replacement to Messenger Express) is here:
    http://msg.wikidoc.info/index.php/Rate-limiting_emails_sent_from_UWC
    My question is could I block that hacker's IP (one particular IP) from logging into our webmail..?The mshttpd (webmail) process provides an IP level filter option (configutil -o service.http.domainallowed -v <filter>):
    http://docs.sun.com/source/816-6009-10/security.htm#13295 (To Create Access Filters for Services)
    Regards,
    Shane.

Maybe you are looking for