Planned Value Problems

Hi everybody
hi everybody
I will
thank any help.
I have a Schedule with Resource
Labor and budget quantity distribuited in manual curve
resource (future period bucket), my baseline is definided
in this way too.
Now, i want show
in Activity Table:
Earned Value
Labor Units (BQWP),
Planned Value Labor Units
(BQWS), and
Actual Labor Units (AQ) 
and my problem is this:
my
activity BBB, have 66331 Man hours distribuited in 6
months in this way 17881, 12759, 12116, 11940, 7707,
3928.
So at finish of first month my Planned
Value is 17881 Man hours but P6 show 10993 same error in
Earned Value Report, but in Resource Spreadsheet the
Planned Value is 17881.
This
problem is in each activity of my schedule, the activities
are definides like fixed duration&units. and i try
solve this problem changing % complete type at Units,
Physical and Duration, without sucessfull. 
Then, how can set P6 for calculate
Planned Value from resource curve in my baseline? 
Regards,
Henry

Dear Friends,
I was trying to solve this
problem, and make a schedule with just one activity
with one resource assignment, and the problem is
same.
I make one activity with 100 Budgeted
units, duration 181 days, scheduled early start
July/01/08. I enter manually budgeted units by month
27, 19, 18, 18, 12, 6.
 Then:
1.- Created Baseline from copy
of this schedule
2.- Start activity on
July/01/08
3.- Run Data date on
July/31/08
this current
schedule have Planned Value units=17, I don´t know
what is wrong?
In WBS i set Earned Value
Tab, for caculate Earned Value by futupe period
Bucket.
in Summary, the Planned
Value Unit and Schedule % Complete are diferent of
Planned Value Expected in Baseline.
 I hope you can help me
 Best Regards
Henry

Similar Messages

Asset still showing planned value for closed fiscal year.

*We have a situation:- After we ran depreciation for Dec 2009, there was a credit memo posting done in the system for a particular asset. Now, the fiscal year has been closed for 2009 and 2010 is opened. Jan and Feb depreciation posting has been done for the asset for year 2010, but the credit memo posting is still stuck as planned value in the 12th period of 2009. How can we take care of that? I canu2019t run unplanned depreciation for 2009. Is there a better way to take care of this? I thought about opening year 2009 for the asset (ccode) and then running unplanned depreciation. Will that be a problem? If yes, what other solution can be proposed.*
*Appreciate the response.*

Hi,
If it is not possible to open the fiscal year because audit
has already been completed we have a workaround which is not quite
correct from the legal side ist thereport RACORR20_A from note 29694.
If in table ANLC there are differences between posted and planed
depr. the report simply makes: planed = posted.
The correct way would be:
-> Reopen your GL for FY 2008 via OB52.
-> Recalculate values (RAAFAR00)
-> RAPOST2000
-> RAPERB2000
-> RAJABS00
Regards Bernhard

Planned values in RA

Hi all,
We have a problem with result analysis - planned values on secondary CEs (planned overheads) are not included in the total planned costs although the respective CEs are correctly assigned row IDs and relevant for RA. This appeared after upgrade. No ZXKG* enhancement in place. Any clue?
thanks to all

Hello Christian,
It is the user outcome from post-upgrade testing. Found in KKA2 (single RA for WBS) - the cummulative planned costs in Plan data of valuation section ( C(p) ) is less than the total planned values displayed in project infosystem and the difference is equal to the value on the secondary CE (type 43). This CE is assigned to ID row and have category K (costs relevant for wip) in OKG4. Verified for several WBS in 2 independent client so that it looks like userexit problem but there is no ZXKG* include.

Planned values of profit centers not showing up in customised report painte

Hi,
I made a customised profit center report via report painter. I have already uploaded planned values in KP06. In the customised report painter, the record type is "1" (plan) and version is "0" for actual/plan. The columns for the planned values do not show any figures. But when I generate std SAP report S_ALR_87013340 - Profit Center Group: Plan/Actual/Variance, it shows the plan values. In that way, I know that the cost center upload is correct.
Please advise on how to show the plan values on the report painter.
Thanks and best regards,
Thess

Hi,
ahhh...the fact that you can see the actual values has made me realize what the problem might be. GLPCP and GLPCA (actual line items) use different fields in regard to the period. I assume that you are utilizing the POPER characteristic to select the periods....correct?
In that case please try the following: copy library 8A3 into the customer name space (I would always base customized reports on your own library). In your copy activate the RPMAX characteristic. The re-create your report based on the new library and make the following changes: use RPMAX in the general selection and only use POPER in the column definition for the actual values. That should work.
Regards
Karl
P.S....hope you bear in mind that such a report is a potential performance nightmare.

Asset planned values computed positive value Issue

HI experts,
I have an existing asset problem where the planned depreciation values becomes positive. Why does it becomes positive? How does system calculates this planned values? We just did some adjustment to the Asset by Credit Memo and another Mark-up transaction. Sample:
Asset 1610600065
Planned Values - Transactions:
26.02.2011     160,000.00-     160     Credit memo in following year     64,000.00     0.00     0.00     SGD
26.12.2010     98,666.66     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     43,851.85-     98,666.66     98,666.66     SGD
26.12.2010     98,666.66-     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     43,851.85     98,666.66-     98,666.66-     SGD
26.12.2010     93,333.33     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     41,481.48-     93,333.33     93,333.33     SGD
26.12.2010     93,333.33-     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     41,481.48     93,333.33-     93,333.33-     SGD
26.02.2011     160,000.00     160     Credit memo in following year     64,000.00-     0.00     0.00     SGD
23.06.2011     160,000.00-     160     Credit memo in following year     60,000.00     0.00     0.00     SGD
26.12.2010     101,333.33     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     33,925.92-     101,333.33     101,333.33     SGD
                                                               26,074.08     101,333.33     101,333.33     SGD
But the planned/posted value for this period is positive:
Status Status Period Amount
Green Posted     1     6,666.67-
Green Posted     2     6,666.66-
Green Posted     3     6,666.67-
Green Posted     4     6,666.67-
Green Posted     5     6,666.66-
Green Posted     6     6,370.37
YellowPlanned     7     4,493.83-
Posted Values - Depreciation Posted/Planned:
APC transactions     400,000.00     160,000.00-     240,000.00     SGD
Acquisition value     400,000.00     160,000.00-     240,000.00     SGD
Ordinary deprec.     220,000.00-     26,962.96-     246,962.96-     SGD
Unplanned dep.                    SGD
Write-ups          101,333.33     101,333.33     SGD
Value adjustment                    SGD
Revaluation ord.dep.                    SGD
Net book value     180,000.00     85,629.63-     94,370.37     SGD
Down payments                    SGD
Scrap value                    SGD

I believe in your case, the tremendous reduction in APC cost has caused a tremendous change in planned depreciation. System looks at the NBV and the remaining periods of useful life each time it calcs depreciation. Of course also looks at depreciation key, Period Control, and OAYR Smoothing button. Asset class can also be set for group depreciation.
If a credit memo reduced the APC value dramatically, then the amount of depreciation on the asset at that moment is more than enough so far. This means that the next running of the AFAB program will reduce its amount of depreciation from the amount it was planning to book since it already has an excess of accumulated depreciation.
Please check in OAYR to know if your Smoothing indicator has been checked for the Company Code. As I understand the system, if this indicator is checked - the system will not catch-up the whole difference in the next running of AFAB. Instead, it will smooth out the adjustments due to credit memos, unplanned depreciation, and changes in remaining useful life over the remaining life of the asset. When smoothing is set, one gets less drastic period to period change.
This setting should be in line with your accounting rules, such as in US GAAP changes in depreciable life are considered estimate changes requiring only prospective corrections, and so should smooth out impact over remaining periods of useful life versus immediate catch-up.
You may want to run a AFAR (check for recalc flags) and then a Repeat AFAB in the current period after making master data changes for depreciation. All open periods would be impacted by master data changes if you run AFAB.

Activity elements planned values not showing in profit centres and cc.

Hi,
i'm currently working on a project involving Co and PS. I'm in charge of the CO module and i've got a problem with planned values on activity elements and in PS. Planned values are calculated on activty elements and so are actual and they show in real time in profit centres and cost centres but not their planned counterpart values. i've absolutely nothing on profit and cost centres reports. Integrated planning is activated in PS and so is project in versions.
i've asked the PS "Expert" and he said it comes from the "plan cost calculation" tab in cj20n, which obviously isn't the cause.
Doesn't it come from the project profile or status profile customizing? (opsa or ok02)?
Can the problem come from CO?
any help appreciated
regards
xavier

Hi Sreenivas,
thanks for your help and sorry for my late answer.
what is the difference between FAGL_CO_PLAN and transaction 1ke0.
when i log on transaction 1ke0, i can see all my planned values.
wouldn't the issue be resolved by launching t-code faglgcle "fi-gl activate update of plan line items" ?
regards
xavier

Planned Values Tab in Condition Type

Hi Everybody ,
As a part of the standard Sales promotion Solution in COPA , the Planned Value tab in the Condition Type for a Sales Deal needs to be available. Tcode VB21 for a Condition type & then click the Magnifier lens...in which the planned values tab should be available. Can anyone tell me how to activate the tab. Its not available in our Dev client.
Thanks
Cheers
Kartik

Dear SAP Gurus
My problem stated more clearly:
The value under PBXX in PO appears during service entry.
The value added to PBXX condition type is not appering during service entry.
PL. help.
Regards
Veronica

Negative Planned Values in CJ40

Dear Guru's,
i am getting negative planned values in CJ40 against Order/Network column. I am unable to find the root of this value.
Here i am using the network costing, BOM's and MRP run process. So can any one tell me how to find the root of that negative cost plan value.
Reagrds,
Rao.

Hi Rao,
Could you please perform the below steps?
1. Execute the transaction CJEN for the affected project
2. Execute the report BPDIST0 in SE38 for the affected project
Should the problem still persists, please implement the report ZAIMPLDL
from the attached note 887864.
1. Execute the report ZAIMPLDL for the project
2. Then execute CJEN and BPDIST0 again.
Regards,
Enrique

Buget Upload, Planned values-KP06

Hi Eeveryone,
I posted budget ( planned values) for a cost center in KP06, and used version 1,its for year 2011 .I can see all the values in report KSBP which is planned line item report.
My problem is I have created a report painter report using LIbrary 0FL- and report executes by profit centers. In the Actual /Plan columns ,system is not extracting out planned values for year 2011. What could be the reason? In my QA client, there system shows the planned values in the same report.I compared the two systems , but everythign is the same.any idea??Thansk
Regards
Shaun

Hi
Am just making a wild guess... In OKEQ, under PCA tab just try by fiddling around with "Online transfer settings"
It wont have impact incase you have not activated EC-PCA...
Just check whether the FAGLFLEXP table is populated with plan records or not...
Also, check
1. If you done settings in GLP2 and GLL1
2. If you have maintained the doc type for planning in New GL and maintained No ranges
3. Try by executing T code FAGL_CO_PLAN.. This transfers the line items from CO-OM to New GL
Regards
Ajay M

Billing Plan Values different in VA02 & VA03

Hi All,
We have a case where in the billing plan values are different for the same sales order when seen in change mode (VA02) & display mode (VA03). can you please let me know what and where the problem can be?
Regards
Sujay

Hi, Rajesh,
My issue is with the billing plan values are not getting copied into the F1 invoice. But when I run the order related billing due list I am able to see all the billing line items with values mentioned in the billing plan.
regards
AVS

Formula FOX erase plan values

Hi all;
I have a problem with a FOX formula.
The goal of this one is to distribute the Quantity of Sales (ZG_QVV010) planned by Sub-Brand (ZSUBMARCA) to the Material according to a distribution key (ZCHDIST).
I have the following formula:
DATA CD TYPE 0DISTR_CHAN.
DATA OV TYPE 0SALESORG.
DATA MAT TYPE 0MATERIAL.
DATA VER_PL TYPE 0VERSION.
DATA VER_RE TYPE 0VERSION.
DATA SUBM TYPE ZSUBMARCA.
DATA GA TYPE ZGESTAREA.
DATA CL TYPE ZCLIENE.
VER_PL = VARV ('ZVERPLA').
VER_RE = VARV ('ZVERREF').
FOREACH CD, OV,SUBM, MAT, GA, CL.
{ZG_QVV011,CD,MAT,OV,L,VER_PL,CL,GA,SUBM,ZUNPLAVN} =
{ZG_QVV010,CD,#,OV,L,VER_PL,CL,GA,SUBM,ZUNPLAVN}*
{ZCHDIST,CD,MAT,OV,#,VER_RE,CL,GA,SUBM,ZUNCHDIS}.
ENDFOR.
The problem is that I want to use the same key figure (ZG_QVV010) and not a new one (ZG_QVV011). But if I replace it, the system erases the plan values by Sub-brand (ZG_QVV010) and dont inserted the new values.
The goal is to have in the Cube this:
ZSUBMARCA MATERIAL QUANTITY
 01 # 100 (by sub-brand)
 01 A 70 (new value for a distribution key 0,7)
 01 B 30 (new value for a distribution key 0,3)
Can anyone help me?
Regards;
Ricardo

Hello Ricardo
Well that is a surprise.
Logically the only way you could get that outcome is if the result of
{ZCHDIST,CD,MAT,OV,#,VER_RE,CL,GA,SUBM,ZUNCHDIS} equals 1.
Try following to debug it:
add to data declarations
DATA A TYPE F.
DATA B TYPE F.
DATA C TYPE F.
Then try the FOREACH as follows:
FOREACH CD, OV,SUBM, MAT, GA, CL.
IF MAT <> #.
A = {ZG_QVV010,CD,#,OV,L,VER_PL,CL,GA,SUBM,ZUNPLAVN}.
B = {ZCHDIST,CD,MAT,OV,#,VER_RE,CL,GA,SUBM,ZUNCHDIS}.
C = {ZG_QVV010,CD,#,OV,L,VER_PL,CL,GA,SUBM,ZUNPLAVN}*
{ZCHDIST,CD,MAT,OV,#,VER_RE,CL,GA,SUBM,ZUNCHDIS}.
MESSAGE I001(UPF) WITH MAT A B C.
*{ZG_QVV010,CD,MAT,OV,L,VER_PL,CL,GA,SUBM,ZUNPLAVN} =
{ZG_QVV010,CD,#,OV,L,VER_PL,CL,GA,SUBM,ZUNPLAVN}
*{ZCHDIST,CD,MAT,OV,#,VER_RE,CL,GA,SUBM,ZUNCHDIS}.
ENDIF.
ENDFOR.
This should give an output with the values for each loop of the FOREACH where material is not # and help identify the problem.
Chris

Does sales order assigned to WBSe increases plan value of WBS element

Hello Experts,
In my project, planning is done using activities, so ideally CN41 report displays the plan values (Proj.cost sched.000) for the network and the WBS assigned to the netwok is same.
E.g. 1000 USD planned for network = 1000 USD planned for the WBSe.
But for one of the project, I see the WBS planned value is more than that of Network though we plan only in NTW.
I can see a sales order assiged to this WBSe for which sales order billing value 1500 USD displayed in CN41 in revenue plan column.
Is there anything like sales order planning? the billing value is for revenue generation but does sales order planning also required? like to complete the sales order, how much is my plan cost? does the sales order plan cost gets updated in the WBS plan cost?
I am asking this question becasue if i look in CJ41 (Display WBS planning) I can see all the cost displayed in the column Order/network
Please clarify me on the sales order assignment.
Regards,

Thanks for the reply and clearing my doubt on sales order.
my problem is as below:
Cost planned on the network: 1000 USD
as in my project, planning is done only on NTW, CN41 report should show:
Project Object---- Proj.cost sched.000
WBS.0001------ 1000 USD
Network --- 1000 USD
however, CN41 report is showing as below:
Project Object---- Proj.cost sched.000
WBS.0001------ 1100 USD
Network --- 1000 USD
I can see that the 100 USD are directly planned on the WBSe if I see the values as non aggregated but I am not able to understand how 100 USD are planned on the WBSe.
If I see CJ41, I can see Planned 1100 USD under the column Order/network
This means that all 1100 usd's are planned using orders/network.
Please help me understanding why there is a difference of 100 USd's at network and WBS level and how to find out where the additional 100 USDs are planned on WBSe.
Thanks

GLPLUP: Excel-Upload for plan values in the special ledger

Hello,
got a problem with the upload function of plan values for special ledger.
I got the file in the right format, defined via transaction GLPLADM, but when i want to load that file, the values are not in the system. the system message displays the the file upload was OK, but there are no protocols and no data in the systems.
Any ideas, why it is not working?
Regards
Florian

Hi,
I did this in Cost Center Planning and it worked once i activated integrated planning and saved a template etc at the layout and on the desktop.
Below link has a detailed process of setting up excel integration.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/da/6ada3889432f48e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Pls provide points if usefull.
Thanks,
Praveen

How to force a sql_id to use a specific hash plan value

Hi,
in my 11.2 database i've seen that a sql_id change hash plan value.
The original was more faster than second, but optimizer use second.
How can i force the sql_id to use the first hash plan value?
Tnx

Hi,
i've a problem.
I've fixed the plan 3 days ago, but looking AWR (today), it use old hash plan.
Plan Hash           Total Elapsed                 1st Capture   Last Capture
#   Value                    Time(ms)    Executions       Snap ID        Snap ID
1   2658787094              3,592,228             0           334            334looking into dba_sql_plan_baselines i've 2 plan_name, and only one is fixed.
select *
from table(dbms_xplan.display_sql_plan_baseline(sql_handle => 'SQL_3d5572d6f5e8cdda', format => 'basic'));
Plan name: SQL_PLAN_3upbkuvuyjmfub082c0c4         Plan id: 2961359044
Enabled: YES     Fixed: NO      Accepted: YES     Origin: MANUAL-LOAD
Plan hash value: 2658787094
Plan name: SQL_PLAN_3upbkuvuyjmfu7ca80389         Plan id: 2091385737
Enabled: YES     Fixed: YES     Accepted: YES     Origin: MANUAL-LOAD
Plan hash value: 3534976400
id plan hash last seen            elapsed (s) origin          note
   1 3534976400 2012-10-26/14:00:11      183.232 AWR             not reproducible
   2 2658787094 2012-10-29/12:00:24    23116.872 AWR             not reproducible Why i see old plan (2658787094)?
Thanks

Planned value and Basis in Sales Deal VK11/12/13

Hi Friends,
I am creating Sale Deals condition type record in transaction VK11. I attached material in deal condition and when I go to "Detail" of that attached material item I am not able to see "Planned Values" frame and its component in screen. Could you please help solve this problem?
Steps for Reconstruction
1. Execute transaction VK11
2. Enter condition type as "Sales Deal" (KA00)
3. In next screen enter appropriate " Sales Org", "DC", and "Customer"
4. In the same screen look at "Customer/Material with release status" frame of table control
5. Enter appropriate material and amount and hit <Enter>
6. Select the item/row of the entered material and hit <F6> or click <Detail> icon in application toolbar.
7. In the next screen the frame < Planned Values> and its fields like <Planned Basis> and < Planned Value> are missing.
Does anyone know about this situation and can help on this?
Thanks and Best Regards, Manoj

Hi,
Try this..Go to t-code V/04 -Change condition table of ur appropriate access sequence..input ur Table number which description u want to change and press enter...
inside u can see table number on top and its description..near to this description u can find "propose/maintain text icon" enter ur description and save...
Now try in VK11..
Reg
JJ
Edited by: Jagsap on Jul 14, 2009 10:52 AM

Planned Value Problems

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for