Playback Quality and Framerate.

Hi I just installed 2 more GBs of RAM into my G5 2.0 Ghz, and I have noticed a must faster preformance with everything, but video playback is still choppy, and the quality is even low. I have used Sony Vegas products for along time now, and even on my old PC with 1 GB of RAM it ran smooth and never slowed down. And the quality was excellent. Is their something I am doing wrong or what?

I downloaded a 640x480 video off the internet
Well there you go. You need to make sure that your projet setting match the clip settings exactly. Plus you are dealing with highly compressed video posted on the internet. Not ideal for editing.
FCP is a great editing application...when used properly. What I mean is that if you capture footage directly from tape or P2 card. If you take random footage from the internet then no, it won't do what you want it to.
Vegas is more designed for that. Vegas is also more of a consumer application, where FCP is a professional application. You are trying to use a professional application in a very "consumer" fashion.
Shane
"There's no need to fear, UNDERDOG is here!"

Similar Messages

  • How do you fix playback quality for still image video on Adobe Premiere Elements 10?

    Hi there, I'm a new editor, and am still wanting to make my first awesome video. I find that when I do a still motion video all quality is very bad, and a little blurry. I asked that question and someone told me to fix the playback quality and I do not know how to fix that. If you can answer my question, please also give me the instructions too.

    First, read these...
    Photo Scaling for Video http://forums.adobe.com/thread/450798
    -Too Large May = Crash http://forums.adobe.com/thread/879967
    -And another crash report http://forums.adobe.com/thread/973935

  • IPad 2 Video playback Quality Issue (Low Contrast and grayish black)

    Does anyone notice that the video playback quality is really bad on the iPad 2? If you try to play any video (youtube, apple trailer, your own converted video) on the iPad 2, any black images will turn grayish... Just put your iPhone, iPod touch, or even the older iPad next to it, then you will notice a BIG difference. The color is similar to what happened when you set the gamma incorrectly on a display.
    Also, you will notice this more if you change the orientation of the device, the contrast will be corrected for a fraction of a second.
    I've tried this on other iPad 2 and they all share the same problem. I tried to talk to the Apple Genius Bar and they refused to give me a proper answer on this, instead simply claiming that is just the way it is... I wanted to refund this but I've passed the 14 days rule and also I got it from a authorized retailer and so Apple just won't take it back.
    I believe it can be fixed by software... Any idea? or I shall throw it away T_T

    I'm on the phone with apple support right now. I work at a post production house, and we/our clients keep having this issue - everything looks great on screen and on the ipad 1, and theres a huge gamma shift on the ipad 2. they need to fix this ASAP. like Jls21 already said, a lot of us use ipads for work purposes - unacceptable!
    this thread ( https://discussions.apple.com/message/15100980#15100980 ) seems to blame the h.264 codec/compression settings…? does anyone know of another codec that prevents this gamma shift on the ipad 2?
    this is from the tech specs page:
    Video formats supported: H.264 video up to 720p, 30 frames per second, Main Profile level 3.1 with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats; MPEG-4 video, up to 2.5 Mbps, 640 by 480 pixels, 30 frames per second, Simple Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps per channel, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats; Motion JPEG (M-JPEG) up to 35 Mbps, 1280 by 720 pixels, 30 frames per second, audio in ulaw, PCM stereo audio in .avi file format
    is there anything that jumps out to anyone regarding workarounds for this issue?
    we've used both Compressor and MPEG Streamclip - there's no quality difference between them, in case anyone is trying that.
    okay so, i was transferred to a senior technical rep and he looked it up - apparently apple is getting a bunch of complaints about this issue and they've submitted it to their developers. the more people that call and complain, the higher up on the priority list it goes to be fixed in a software update. there is no workaround known, and it's a standard issue across all ipad 2's.

  • IMovie HD (6.0.3) - Export Quality and Editing Question

    Hi guys, i wanted to ask two questions. The first is that i wanted to export videos to upload onto YouTube and the best format for this seems to be the CD-ROM format that is available on the version i have, the only thing is my videos still appear low quality and pixellated even though i am editing good quality videos......i was wondering if i was doing anything wrong/or can do something better?
    Also, when i am editing, can i place logos or maybe pictures onto the video e.g. with TV channels they have a logo at the corner of the screen. I also wanted to black out text on screen but i don't seem to be able to do that.
    Thanks a lot.

    QuickTime has never supported anything more than "playback" of MPEG-1 formats and conversions to QuickTime formats will never include audio.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG-1 a "format" created a long time ago.
    iMovie 7 can import and convert most MPEG-2 formats (DVD and HD media) and include audio. It also uses QuickTime for the work.
    MPEG Streamclip does allow "batch" conversions. Do them while you sleep.

  • CK-200 poor music playback quality

    Hi, I've just installed the car kit CK-200 (ISO cable version) into my car and I'm very disappointed by the music playback quality.
    I have Nokia C7 with the latest firmware (14.002) and I have also updated the car kit firmware into 3.0.
    There's no problem with the phone call quality - I would say it is comparable to the other car kits (for example to CK-7W I've had before), but if I want to use it for playing music, it still plays it in "phone call-like" quality. I have tried different players, but no success - still the same low quality.
    If I turn the FM transmitter on and tune up the car radio to the transmitters' frequency, I get much better quality then via this car kit (although sometimes it's noisy from other broadcasting radios).
    In the product description of this CK-200 they highlight very good sound quality thanks to some DSP technology - I hope there's more than this.
    Do you have any idea what might be the problem here?

    Hi
    The CK-200 is a mono output car kit that is only designed for calls, not music.
    If a handset is playing music via the mono Bluetooth channel, this is a fluke, and not part of the design of the handset.
    The CK-100, 300, 600 are all stereo car kits with music capability.
    The DSP settings on the CK-200 manage the voice vs background noise in the car so the driver can be heard more clearly by the other caller.

  • Can I modify the Export to... iTunes settings for better audio quality and compression?

    I am working on some Music Videos to DJ at a party with, I notice that when I export them as .mov files with Final Cut HD Express, they have 320 kbps and 44.100 kHz in the audio compression settings. Once I export them in Quicktime 10.2, using the File / Export to... / iTunes drop down menu, the Second, (ipad, iphone 4, & AppleTV) setting (not using HD, so the Mac and PC tab is not an option.) The final exported file, that plays great in itunes, appletv, ipad, etc. has a reduced quality audio of Bit Rate of 159 kbps (instead of 320 kbps) and Sample Rate of 32.000 kHz (instead of 44.100 kHz). Is there anyway to change these preset settings somehow?
    The Formats on the File / Export / menu are even less dinamic?
    I also noticed that some of the Music videos I purchased from the itunes store some years ago, have a 256 Kbps and 44.100 kHz setting. Which is better quality than the ones exported from Quicktime 10.
    I thought maybe with Quicktime 7 Pro, I could fine tune all the presets, but it got too complicated for me, might this be an option? What would the settings be?
    Using Widescreen 853 x 480 at full quality .mov file.
    thanks.

    I am working on some Music Videos to DJ at a party with, I notice that when I export them as .mov files with Final Cut HD Express, they have 320 kbps and 44.100 kHz in the audio compression settings. Once I export them in Quicktime 10.2, using the File / Export to... / iTunes drop down menu, the Second, (ipad, iphone 4, & AppleTV) setting (not using HD, so the Mac and PC tab is not an option.) The final exported file, that plays great in itunes, appletv, ipad, etc. has a reduced quality audio of Bit Rate of 159 kbps (instead of 320 kbps) and Sample Rate of 32.000 kHz (instead of 44.100 kHz). Is there anyway to change these preset settings somehow?
    Your question basically has too facets. The first is the quality of the source audio in terms of sampling rate and data rate. Under normal circumstances you don't want to export the audio using a sample rate or per channel data rate that is lower than your original source if you are trying to maintain the quality as high as possible and, on the other hand, you don't want to use settings greater than the source values since they increase the final file size without improving the quality of the audio.
    The second is the workflow. Since you indicate you are using FCE HD for editing, then using QT X to re-export the data seems somewhat redundant. While it has been many, many years since I last used FCE HD, if I remember correctly, you have both "Export QT Movie" and "Export using QT Conversion" options. The first option takes the audio and video format in which you are editing and merely copies the edited data in that format to a new MOV file container. On the other hand, the second option allows you export the edited data format directly to a user selected compression format using user selected options (but does assume the user knows how to best use these options). These are, BTW, the same export options available in QT 7 Pro.
    I thought maybe with Quicktime 7 Pro, I could fine tune all the presets, but it got too complicated for me, might this be an option? What would the settings be?
    What is so difficult here? If the source is DVD stereo quality (usually 48.0 KHz @ 192 Kbps then set your output for stereo 48.0 KHz @ 192 Kbps. If you wish to save a bit of file space, the you can use 48.0 KHz @ 160 Kbps but that is normally as low as I go. As to setting combinations in QT 7 Pro, once you set the sampling rate, the application becomes cuntextually adaptive and will only allow you to select data rates that are "standards" compliant and non-compliant ones are automatically greyed out. Rendering quality settings are self-explanatory. These are the basics if you are using a preset option like the "Movie to MPEG-4" export option. If using more complex options like the "Movie to QT Movie" option, then you will need to also consider how you plan to use your file to select the correct encoding strategy. For instance, a constant bit rate is good for optical media from the standpoint of providing a constant flow of data to the player. Unfortunately, this is not very efficient since it forces the quality to vary as it maintains the constant data rate. A variable but contarined data rate is also good for optical media or fast start online files but allows the data rate to vary between user selected data rate excursions and thus provides improved quality over the constant data rate strategy. The variable data rate allows the user to target a specific level of audio quality and will then allow the data rate to vary as needed to maintain a constant level of quality. This option is better suited for playback on a computer since the bit rate can vary greatly in magnitude. The average setting allows the user to target a specific average target data rate but allows it fluctuate as the encoder applies predictor-corrector adjustments. This option, like the constant data rate option, is good for average complexity content when creating a target file of predictable size but can somtimes have problems towards the end of the file if the content suddenly becomes more complex than predicted.
    Using Widescreen 853 x 480 at full quality .mov file.
    I would rarely recommend using the full quality slider setting. This is more of a redundancy setting forcing the encoder to recycle through certain encoding routines in an effort to improve quality without increasing the data rate. You would like do better to increase the video data rate limit and decrease the quality slider to something in the 50 to 80% range. You also indicate the files are 853x480. Such files are frequently the result of anamorphic widescreen MPEG-2 or DV source files. If so, I would normally recommend retaining this anamorphic strategy by encoding the H.264 video at the same 720x480 matrix dimensions and allowing the player to properly display the files at their targeted aspect ratio. This strategy will either allow for slightly better quality at the current video data rate setting or allow the user to retain the current level of quality using a slightly lower data rate which, in turn, means a slightly smaller final file size.

  • How achieve highest playback quality from shared iMovie HDV Project?

    I have a Sony HDR-HC9 1080i HDV tape camcorder and I am able to play back HD video to either a Mac computer or to a Panasonic Full HD 1080p TV. Playback quality of unedited HD holiday video footage to TV using HDMI cable and to the computer via Firewire is superb. This excellent playback quality is also preserved in an edited iMovie Project in HDV format 57 minutes long and 48 GB in size which I made from the original 90 minutes holiday video footage.
    The problems arose in trying to preserve this high quality when sharing the iMovie Project. Before I bought this HDV camcorder I had a Sony DV tape camcorder and I always used to make an archive tape from an edited DV Project by exporting the iMovie Project back to tape. However, when attempting to do the same with this latest HDV 48 GB Project the computer message informed me that it would take about 43 hours to do this. So that is out of the question!
    Next I decided to make a Quicktime movie from the iMovie HDV Project using Full Quality compression via Apple Intermediate Codec (1440 x 1080). This took 12 hours to do! Computer viewing of the resultant 44 GB movie gave excellent image sharpness in still views, but for views of moving objects and also panned footage from the camera, closer viewing showed fine comb-outlining on most objects, but especially on narrow vertical objects. Is this what some of you call "jaggies" and is it an interlacing artifact? Whatever it is it was NOT in the iMovie Project but was introduced by the compression process Project->>Movie. Still worse was the jerky playback of the movie. The "IMovie Inspector" info confirmed that the movie had been made during the compression process at 25 frames per second whereas playback was in the range of only 3 to 10 fps! Previously made shorter Quicktime HD movies have not shown this jerky playback and played at 25 fps. Can anyone explain why this jerky playback occurred with the the longer 44GB movie?
    Finally I made a DVD by dragging the uncompressed iMovie HD Project icon directly onto a DVD theme in iDVD and burning. The result was OK on both the computer and on TV but not great. Close viewing on the computer showed an effect which looked like a thin film of water rippling horizontally. This effect also showed in TV viewing of the DVD. Interestingly, this effect was almost eliminated when "Deinterlace" was UNCHECKED in the iDVD player viewing options.
    My own conclusion is that the highest quality for archiving and playback is achieved by storing the large edited iMovie HDV PROJECT on an external hard drive and playing it back at full screen size on the Mac computer. In this way the iMovie editing functions such as the Timeline are hidden from view and cause no distraction when watching the superb HDV quality.
    IS THERE A BETTER WAY?
    Please comment and advise.
    Vee Kay

    I have a Sony HDR-HC9 1080i HDV tape camcorder and I am able to play back HD video to either a Mac computer or to a Panasonic Full HD 1080p TV. Playback quality of unedited HD holiday video footage to TV using HDMI cable and to the computer via Firewire is superb. This excellent playback quality is also preserved in an edited iMovie Project in HDV format 57 minutes long and 48 GB in size which I made from the original 90 minutes holiday video footage.
    The problems arose in trying to preserve this high quality when sharing the iMovie Project. Before I bought this HDV camcorder I had a Sony DV tape camcorder and I always used to make an archive tape from an edited DV Project by exporting the iMovie Project back to tape. However, when attempting to do the same with this latest HDV 48 GB Project the computer message informed me that it would take about 43 hours to do this. So that is out of the question!
    Next I decided to make a Quicktime movie from the iMovie HDV Project using Full Quality compression via Apple Intermediate Codec (1440 x 1080). This took 12 hours to do! Computer viewing of the resultant 44 GB movie gave excellent image sharpness in still views, but for views of moving objects and also panned footage from the camera, closer viewing showed fine comb-outlining on most objects, but especially on narrow vertical objects. Is this what some of you call "jaggies" and is it an interlacing artifact? Whatever it is it was NOT in the iMovie Project but was introduced by the compression process Project->>Movie. Still worse was the jerky playback of the movie. The "IMovie Inspector" info confirmed that the movie had been made during the compression process at 25 frames per second whereas playback was in the range of only 3 to 10 fps! Previously made shorter Quicktime HD movies have not shown this jerky playback and played at 25 fps. Can anyone explain why this jerky playback occurred with the the longer 44GB movie?
    Finally I made a DVD by dragging the uncompressed iMovie HD Project icon directly onto a DVD theme in iDVD and burning. The result was OK on both the computer and on TV but not great. Close viewing on the computer showed an effect which looked like a thin film of water rippling horizontally. This effect also showed in TV viewing of the DVD. Interestingly, this effect was almost eliminated when "Deinterlace" was UNCHECKED in the iDVD player viewing options.
    My own conclusion is that the highest quality for archiving and playback is achieved by storing the large edited iMovie HDV PROJECT on an external hard drive and playing it back at full screen size on the Mac computer. In this way the iMovie editing functions such as the Timeline are hidden from view and cause no distraction when watching the superb HDV quality.
    IS THERE A BETTER WAY?
    Please comment and advise.
    Vee Kay

  • Problems with playback quality of animated DVD on television

    I'm sending a ~20 minute (uncompressed, millions of colors) animation in QuickTime out of Final Cut Express HD in a format of HD-1080i and trying to get a very high resolution DVD for television (HD TV). Before taking the QuickTime video to any DVD writing software the aspect ratio (16:9) is correct and resolution is immaculate.
    However, all my efforts to get a super-high resolution DVD of this animation, whether I go through iMovie or only to iDVD have gotten me a lot of written and wasted DVDs in my tests. The resolution is very poor.
    QUESTION:
    How do I get a very complex animation that requires very intense color and clarity to a DVD for playback on a HD TV using my software? In my arsenal is Final Cut Express-HD vers. 3, iLIfe '06 incl. iMovie and iDVD, Toast (if needed).
    Please advise.

    HHHMMM….. where to start. First, you can’t possibly
    hold yourself to commercial quality unless you have a
    commercial budget.
    I don't expect commercial quality - just to be able to display the millions of colors and the extreme clarity on any TV and even better still on a HDTV. So far I only can get the quality I seek on a computer display. All my efforts to find a solution for television playback have resulted in a fuzzy and jerky animated feature. Here again I'm not looking for commercial quality - just clear, crisp and smooth.
    Hollywood spends millions on
    feature films. Compression hardware alone can run
    several thousands if not hundreds of thousands of
    dollars. Compared to iDVD included in a $79 software
    suite? However, even the Hollywood produced DVDs must
    rely on the DVD specification and as such, 1080i is
    currently lost on them. So your answer to “isn’t iDVD
    supposed to write anything I give it” is that if iDVD
    takes your QT file (Which BTW, should be in the DV
    format) it WILL compress it to a DVD MPEG 2 compliant
    file. This means 720x480.
    But I don't want any compression other than the final step MPEG2. And after reading this reply today - THANK YOU - THANK YOU - I at least understand now that I can't even use iDVD because it doesn't offer MPEG2 as a compressor.
    I have located a mpeg2 encoder program that is shareware and will try to find a formule to use after iMovie HD additions of themes and chapters.
    So the first step to take
    is to recognize the limitations of equipment and
    understand the standards. So now we should examine
    the workflow to see if there is anything that can be
    done. Other than knowing what Flash is, I don’t know
    much about it. Can you select a frame size for doing
    your animations? If so, guess what, use the 720x480
    frame size. This is what iDVD is going to make it
    (again, FCP may offer more options to you but that
    isn’t listed in your arsenal).
    Final Cut Pro isn't needed for what I'm doing, is it? I have already gotten exquisite playback quality for computers using FCE HD and I'm now trying to get the playback quality on a TV as good as I can get it.
    Next, from within FCE,
    do not change the settings when exporting via QT. You
    want to export it as it is in FCE, you don’t want to
    change it. iDVD is expecting a DV file. Any other
    file and quality will likely take a hit. Finally, why
    DVDs? Flash is typically web based. And computer
    monitors have a much higher resolution than a TV.
    Flash is generally web based but it can be used to produce a single QuickTime movie if the elements are primarily drawings as my animated feature is. Then on to Final Cut Express all of my imported clips are in QuickTime and thus are already compresssed by QuickTime's excellent compressor. I found that I do not get a good result if I allow any further compression - at least not on computer displays - as long as I export with QT conversion, compression none, millions of colors and specify the size I want it to maintain.
    You
    could output your Files and serve them up via a data
    DVD to be played on a computer. Just curious.
    I am already getting excellent playback quality on computers but now I need playback quality on any television because it is not intended only for computers.
    Mike
    Thanks Mike. You've already been a help in getting me away from iDVD for this project. iMovie may be OK still because its "HD". Got any more suggestions for my situation?

  • Poor CD playback quality with iTunes 7.2.0.35.

    When I play CDs using iTunes the playback is very poor. There are popping sounds that are really annoying. There may also be a slight distortion.
    The playback on Windows Media player is fine and the playback with Ubuntu (dual boot) sounds good as well.
    Importing from CD works fine. The playback quality is good.
    Why is iTunes CD playback quality so poor?
    Thanks,
    Graham

    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=93610
    "Enable Maximum Audio Hardware Acceleration (Windows XP only)
    1. On the Start menu, choose Control Panel.
    2. Open Sounds and Audio Devices.
    3. Click the Volume tab and then click the Advanced button from the Speaker settings section.
    4. When the Advanced Audio Properties window opens, select the Performance tab.
    5. In the Audio playback section increase the Hardware acceleration to Full.
    6. Click OK in both the Advanced Audio Properties window and then the Sound and Audio Devices Properties window."

  • Changing playback quality to 1/4 does not work for this one clip...

    So, I've recently ran into a really annoying problem when editing one of my videos, even though I click the 1/4 playback quality, this one clip still plays in full. My recording setup has not changed, I still and have always been using my iPod Touch and this is the first time I encountered this

    It's likely that the resolution of the footage from the iPod Touch is much higher than the rest of your clips. In this case, the other clips will appear to be much more pixelated than the one from the iPod when you turn down the playback resolution.
    Rest assured that the iPod footage is being affected by the resolution setting, even though it might not be as visually obvious as the other clips.

  • Exported iphoto slideshow to itune but playback quality is low

    I am using Macbook air Early 2014. OS X 10.10.1 
    My question is I exported iphoto slideshow to itune but playback quality is low. I used 480P MP4 format. How I can improve this?
    Lo

    Hello!
    My first question is pretty obvious:
    - is the quality great when previewing your slideshow in iPhoto?
    If so, try the following:
    delete the bad slideshow from iTunes
    go back to iPhoto and select a better quality export method, like 720p or 1080p
    Did that help?

  • Canvas playback quality lose while playback

    Strange happening which I never see it before. Playback is low quality but while pause, it show very clear picture. I even set it up high quality and Safe RT setting.  What is else I miss it? 
    I even export full quicktime and still low quality. Puzzled!

    You need to render; in the Sequence->Render menus, make sure all render types (colors) have a check mark beside them, then render the Sequence.  If you're using clips in the Timeline that don't work natively in FCP, you'll find yourself having to render a lot.
    -DH

  • Best playback quality.

    hey, i was just wondering how to get the best playback quality
    in the playback settings video quality is set to high and art is unlimited(what is rt stand for?) Is there anything i can do to make it look a bit better? Thanks people
    syd

    Is there anything i can do to make it look a bit better?<<</div>
    Yes. View it on a calibrated external TV monitor .. preferably a professional grade monitor.
    Keep in mind that FCP's Canvas is only a proxy playback - not full resolution or quality. Increasing the Canvas window size so it can accommodate 100% view will help some, but it's always best to be viewing your work on an external TV monitor.
    -DH

  • Playback Quality Even Lower in FCP X?

    For better or worse, I am currently using my MacBook Air 1.86GHz 2GB RAM on OSX 10.6.8 with Final Cut Pro X. I am working on a 40-45 minute film project that involves large quantities of AVCHD footage from my Canon HF 10 and I am utilizing a new 1TB Western Digital external hard drive (the model that is powered via the USB without a wall AC adapter).
    Due to my set-up, playback in FCP X is choppy and that makes it difficult to work in FCP.
    My two part question is this:
    First, is there a way to lower my playback quality beyond just the two settings in the FCP X preferences for "Better Performance" and "High Quality"? Would this even help given the need for my files to travel via USB into FCP?
    Second, is the problem unrelated to my settings for playback quality - would acquiring a USB external HDD with an AC adapter allow for better speeds and therefore smoother playback in FCP X?
    What it all dials down to is: Is it the CPU and RAM on my MacBook Air that is causing choppy playback or is it the USB transfer and how can I improve playback?
    I'd rather not have to export a .mov file every time I want to check whether my cuts are being made properly - playback in FCPX is dropping frames like there's no tomorrow.
    Thanks in advance for the help!
    -Jack

    Hi Jack,
    USB drives are definitely a bottleneck, whether bus powered or plugged into the wall. Editing AVCHD (e.g., h264) footage takes a lot of horsepower as well.
    I'd advise you to transcode your footage to Prores (you can do this by selecting 'optimize media' either during import or afterwards in the event browser by choosing "Transcode media"). However, you might end up even having to use proxy media since the USB throughput still might not be enough. Proxy media is a lower resolution version using the prores proxy codec.
    Try these out with just one or two short clips and see if that helps performance.
    With regards to your second question, if you are using a 3.5" drive, I'd advise using AC power and not the bus. This isn't for performance reasons, it's more for hard drive safety reasons. A 2.5" drive usually doesn't need as much power, and is generally safe to be bus-powered (as long as you aren't using any other bus powered USB devices at the same time).
    EDIT -- if at all possible, upgrade your RAM. I don't know if the Airs allow that though. That would definitely make a difference.

  • Why is it that when I connect my iPhone 5S to my Windows Vista computer, the photos made with my iPhone are all of very low quality and most of them are turned upside down?

    Why is it that when I connect my iPhone 5S to my Windows Vista computer, the photos made with my iPhone are all of very low quality and most of them are turned upside down?
    On another note, the iPhone tells me that it's ''busy'' when opening a photo on the computer.
    (I tried restarting my PC, connecting via another USB port, importing using PhotoStream, etc...)

    Are you using the front or rear camera? When you say they are low quality, are you referring to file/pixel size, or how the picture looks? As far as upside down, how are you holding the phone? Older versions of Windows have issues reading the Metadata from the pictures and will not display the same.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Re: Forte Estimating Metrics

    Greg, In my experience, the class-count metric is a poor one for time estimation, for four reasons: 1. The actual time/class is very domain- and implementation- sensitive. Industry averages are fairly unhelpful, unless you happen to employ average pr

  • Full hd

    Can I work with video full hd (1920 x 1080) if I use Premiere element 11 ?

  • V7: How to create new authlessanonymous users

    in v7, I can no longer go into the desktop settings and setup the authless user (as stated in the v6.x documentation), so how can I do this? Obviously is can be done from the new samples installed by default. I've tried going into the new Org, creati

  • Is there any BAPI calling only  ABAP command SET UPDATE TASK LOCAL

    Hi abapers we have a requirement to run SET UPDATE TASK LOCAL befor calling BAPI_ENTRYSHEET_CREATE command by JAVA through JCO. is there any BAPI that contains SET UPDATE TASK LOCAL command or simillar functionality. Thanks & Regards, Ramesh

  • How to create channel mixer by script

    How I can create channel mixer by JavaScript?