PO account assignment : blank vs P vs Q

Hi,
I'm a newbie in MM. recently, there's a need to make PO material stock which is the inventory posting should be directly to inventory account, but it also needs to trace the cost into WBS.
i've already tested some ways below:
1. create PO material stock with blank account assignmet.
==> the mapped GL account is correct (inventory account) but impossible to input the WBS
2. create PO material stock with account assignment is set to P.
==> WBS can be inputted, but the mapped GL account is wrong (mapped to Expense)
3. create PO material stock with account assignment is set to Q.
==> both of GL account and WBS are possible to be inputted, but when i want to post, error message "Enter WBS element" always pop up, although i've already input the WBS.
anyone could help me?
Thanks a lot
Nasikhin

Hi
In the PO material stock with account assignment Q you need to specify the WBS elemnt in the account assignment tab of the PO Line item.
At the time of MIGO for GR using 101 the Stock will be posted into the Inventory account & with Special Stock indicator P - Specifying as project Stock.
The same can be checked out using MMBE
Once the material is consumed using 221 Q in MB1A then the consumption accounts get trigerred.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Similar Messages

Account Assignment group is blank in billing dcoument !

Hi,
In some order Account assignment group is blank in billing document which led to Account determination error in production system .
I have checked account assignment group is already maintained for material(mm03) and customer(xd03) in the PEC.
In VF02 for only one item in order AAG is coming as blank . that is why in account determination analysis for that item 'No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFK' is coming . And User is getting Account determination error . I have checked in VKOA G/L account is maintained.
I know manually I can enter the value of AAG in VF02 for the item & error will get resolved but I want to find the reason since it is in PEC system.
Can anyone provides solution k why AAG comes blank for billing document that led to account determination error. ?
thanks in adv.
Reg,
Rahul.

Hi Rahul,
Kindly refer the answers below:
Q. Can you suggest where/how to check all condition table which is being used to determine G/L account
A. After creating the invoice, go to VF02 transaction code by providing your billing document nnumber and enter it. In main menu bar, you need to choose Environment --> Acc.determ.analysis --> revenue Accounts. Here you will get on what level GL code is getting determined. Further in transaction VKOA, you can check on what basis / selection parameters G/L codes are aligned. In VKOA initial screen, you will have the table column. If table is showing as 230, that means in SE16 transaction code, it will be C230.
Q. Why AAG value is blank in Billing document.
Regards.

PO Account assignment category change blanks out GL account

When changing the AAC on a PO from 'I' to a 'U', for certain price conditions, the GL account gets blanked out. The OME9 setting for both I and U is 'GL account number field is mandatory'. This occurs even when no GR/IR have been performed on the PO. The error message ME083 - 'Enter GL Account' is thrown. Occurs in ME22N and when using BAPI_PO_ChANGE. Is this normal?
Thanks for your help.
-Sanjay

I think it is normal. There is a checkbox 'Derive acct. assgt.' in OME9. Here is the help text on this field.
If Inventory Management is not active in your system, you must specify (enter) the preliminary account assignments for all the items manually. Setting this indicator enables you to by-pass this step. You will then no longer get the dialog box for the entry of a preliminary account assignment.
You maintain the automatic account assignment specification facility using the Customizing functionality of Financial Accounting under Maintain automatic account determination.
Check the checkbox and see if it solves your issue. Apparently, checking this checkbox enables fetching the account from Maintain automatic account assignment config. table.

Funded Program in ME21N with Account Assignment Category equal BLANK

Hi
I am doing one ME21N (create purchase order) with Account Assignment Category equal BLANK " ". In u201Caccount assignmentu201D the system only allow to fill the fields u201Cfunds centeru201D, and the u201Ccommitment itemu201D but as the purchase is to INVESTMENT I need to fill the field FUNDED PROGRAM too. I haven´t internal order (CO) and project (wbs element) to do one derivation in this point of process (these objects will be create during the business process). I have already tried to use the fields of FMDERIVE´s trace but unfortunately any combination help me to define the Funded Program.
thanks,
Claudio

Hi Claudio,
I want also to share with you some information about Funded Programs.
Funded programs are used mainly as FM account assignment elements, in the same way as funds, funds centers, commitment items, and functional areas are. Budget can be entered for them and monitored in them.
You can enter the funded program directly in budgeting, but when you are using the funded program in integrated postings, it is not possible to enter the funded program directly. This is the system design.
The funded program uses much of the functionality of the Business Data Toolset (BDT). If you want to customize the funded program master data, you should be familiar with the BDT.
The use of funded program as part of FM account assignment for budgeting, can cause performance issues (posting and reports).
SAP recommends that:
a. Funded Program must be derived using rules specified in the FM derivation tool (FMDERIVE);
b. While you can use any operative element as the source for deriving funded programs, we strongly recommend that you use only WBS elements, orders, or networks.
For additional information, check SAP help in the following link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/74/35160eea86034aa4166151005e1a93/frameset.htm
For BDT information, check the following help: http://help.sap.
com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/78/7c543ac368906ce10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Value Blank/space is invalid for account assignment element fund

Hello!
I created an invoice with several items linked to funds reservation.
when the invoice has 2 line items, the payment run is executed without problem.
when the invoice has more than 3 line items, the payment run is executed with error.
The message error (message number F6804) is "value blank/space is invalid for account assignment element fund".
I dont know where i should enter a valid value for fund.
Thanks for your kind help!
Chiachen

Hi Chiachen,
The problem occurred because the functional area is not inherited from the Purchase order during MIRO posting. As a result, error message F6841 is issued.
There are 2 main programs for the FM derivation:
1. Function Module FM_DERIVE_ACCOUNT_FROM_COBL
2. Program LFMCOBLF06
The latest notes which affects these 2 programs are 1244381 and 1247982.
Kindly implement these notes using SNOTE.
During this process, it should also bring in all the other pre-requisite notes. Do not worry if the
symptoms described in the notes do not match yours. What's more important is to bring the coding in your system up to date. Please retest MIRO after the notes are applied. Let me know the results.
Check also the notes 17941 and 982511.
I hope it helps
Best Regards,
Vanessa Barth.

Error Message F6804 Value Blank/Space invalid for account assignment elemen

Dear Experts,
We have a problem in Travel Management,
I have created a trip for paid by company expenses only and entered cost distribution (fund, funds center and WBS) in the trip.
When I transfer a trip to FI through transaction PRRW throughing error message "F6804 Value Blank/Space invalid for account assignment element for fund and FI313 No funds center entered/ derived in Item".
The paid by com. expenses receipts of wage types credited with - positive amount in 2nd symbolic account offsetting entry and flagged W/CO also the symbolic code linked to linked to Temprary clearing GL it is BS GL .
I checked all the existing threads messages but I did not get solution.
the problem comes up from our upgradation, 6 months back we upgraded to ECC 6.
We don't have any problems in our old 4.7 system still it is working fine.
I created OSS but still they did not solved and they are refering all passed notes.
could any one give the solution to come out from this problem?
Thanks and Regards,
Satya

Hi Satya,
Basically the error is because of Funds Management which you have activated. Please check the note 1268001, 701291, 558295 & 936658 but i dont know will this be helpful or not.
Regards,
S.Srikanth
Edited by: SrikanthS on Oct 26, 2010 11:17 AM

Extension of input fileds in Sales order for account assignment

Dear Gurus,
Can anyone tell me how to extend input fields like Statistical order(COBL-AUFNR) and cost center(COBL-KOSTL) in sales order for accounting assignment and these fields have to be ready for manual entries. The order types are ZHGA and ZHV.
Which program has to be modified and how it can be modified?
Thanks a lot for help and advice.
Cheers,
Ricky
Edited by: Ricky.Martin on Apr 23, 2010 10:45 AM

Dear Rajendra,
There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
Definitely material Tax classification will influence to determine the Tax code.
-->So Make sure that customer and material master having proper tax classification indicator.
-->Have you Update the price after changing the tax classification in the sales order.by going to item dat -->condition tab then click on Update push button bottom of the conditions screen.
-->Once again the check the condition record maintanence also for your MWST access sequence.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

G/L account determination through material account assignment group

Hi ,
I would really appreciate any help on this . The scenario is .
We changed the account assignment group of maetrial to 01 just 2 days back.
We have old open sales order line up for this particular material . When I am trying to Bill these open orders , the system is not recognizing the account assignment grp change which happened 2 days back ,because of which I am getting a A/C determination error .
This is a I/C order and we have PO linked to it. I am suggesting to back out everything (Do Invoice reversal,MIGO cancellation,PO cancellation , then cancel invoice ,delivery and sales order ) so that we can create a new cycle and the system will recognize the account assignment grp change and determines the G/L whwn it comes to acounting .
1. Is this the right way
2. Is there any other way by which I can make the accounting happen
It was very obvoius that when I see the account determination analysis ,the system wasn't able to find the account assignment grp for the material .
Thanks
Sridhar

Dear Sridhar
First of all, I dont think, you will be able to change the Account Assignment Group of a material in sale order if any subsequent document is generated bcoz the said field will become uneditable. Moreover, via MASS, this is not possible as the field name of Account Assignment Group for material (KTGRM) is not available in MASS.
So the other option is via MASS, you can assign Reason for Rejection for existing orders. To assign Reason for Rejection in bulk is run T.Code MASS, input [BUS2032] as Object Type and execute. There block he Sales Order Item Data and click on Fields and block the field MASSVBAP-ABGRU and execute. Input the sale orders if possible otherwise leave it blank and once again execute. Now you can assign Reason for Rejection in mass.
Meanwhile, you have to create new orders for all those open items.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

No error message when incorrect account assignment type K in PO

Hello,
When creating a PO with any raw materials, I can either enter K in the account assignment type, either let the field blank.
If there is no assignment the system will use key EIN to make the posting, if there is an assignment K (compulsory for services for instance), the system will use key VBR.
In this case (raw material), I do not want the users to be able to save their PO if the account assignment has been entered in the item (only blank account assignment type for materials dealt with in stock and value).
Does anyone have a solution?
Best regards,
Ronan

Hi,
This means ERS is active in your system.
What this means is that when you do a GRN, an ERS flag is activated in the PO header. The ERS is then settled using the PO data in SRM.
If you have not settled this (at least this is what is indicated from the message), then uncheck this flag in the PO header and then try and archive.
Cheers.

Urgent plz...Error: Multiple Account assignment in BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE

Hi All,
I'm using BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE to create the PR . The PR is created successfully with service lines. The service lines for PR item has to be assigned to different account assignment. My problem is that account assignment is not getting assigned to the service line for multiple account assignment cases, instead the account assignment is blank for the sevice line.
Here is part of my code.
For Account Assignment
t_requisitionaccoun-preq_item = '00010'.
t_requisitionaccoun-serial_no = '01'.
t_requisitionaccoun-g_l_acct = '0000630010'.
t_requisitionaccoun-cost_ctr = '0801112560'.
append t_requisitionaccoun
t_requisitionaccoun-preq_item = '00010'.
t_requisitionaccoun-serial_no = '02'.
t_requisitionaccoun-cost_ctr = '0801111710'
t_requisitionaccoun-g_l_acct = '0000610090'.
append t_requisitionaccoun
t_requisitionaccoun-preq_item = '00020'.
t_requisitionaccoun-serial_no = '01'.
t_requisitionaccoun-cost_ctr = '0801111710'
t_requisitionaccoun-g_l_acct = '0000610090'.
append t_requisitionaccoun
For Service account Assignment
*<b>PR item 10</b>
Service item 1
t_requisitionsrvaccass-pckg_no = '0000000002'.
t_requisitionsrvaccass-line_no = 2. " line 1 is the header for service
t_requisitionsrvaccass-serno_line = '01'.
t_requisitionsrvaccass-quantity = '10'
t_requisitionsrvaccass-serial_no = '01'
APPEND t_requisitionsrvaccass.
Service item 2
t_requisitionsrvaccass-pckg_no = '0000000002'.
t_requisitionsrvaccass-line_no = 3.
t_requisitionsrvaccass-serno_line = '01'.
t_requisitionsrvaccass-quantity = '10'
t_requisitionsrvaccass-serial_no = '02'
APPEND t_requisitionsrvaccass.
*<b>PR item 20</b>
Service item 1
t_requisitionsrvaccass-pckg_no = '0000000004'.
t_requisitionsrvaccass-line_no = 2. " line 1 is the header for service
t_requisitionsrvaccass-serno_line = '01'.
t_requisitionsrvaccass-quantity = '10'
t_requisitionsrvaccass-serial_no = '01'
APPEND t_requisitionsrvaccass.
With this code, what I get is the blank account assignment for PR item 10 and correctly filled account assignment for PR item 20.
Does anyone done this before and can give me some help. Thanks.

Hi, can you send me an example of this BAPI.
I have the same requeriment, i'm new with bapis
thanks

PO account assignment Q + Purchase order has no items + M7033

Hi All,
I have create a PO with account assignment Q and now when I am trying to post GR to this PO I am getting the error 'Purchase Order has no items' Message number M7033. Please Guide.
Thanks and Regards
Pavan

Following are the reason
Check the confirmation tab ate item level at the purchase order. It should be blank.
Is there any goods receipt ag. this PO, if yes, check the PO history tab at item livel in the PO. Check the pending qty.
It sholud not be deleted PO.
Check the delivery date in the PUrchase order.
Check the release stratagy in the PO. It should be release.
Thanks,
Samir Bhatt

ASSET CODE FOR ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT CATEGORY IN PURCHASE ORDER.

Sir,
greetings!!!
here is a procedure we follow...
We create asset code(AS01) for capital items. when createing Capital purchase order for the item, we give A as asset for assignment category which then asks for asset code in acc assignment cat tab. this is a general process.
Now problem is that I want the field of account assignment category in PO item tab to be automatically populated with the asset code at the time when I put the material and plant i.e capital item.
Is it possible.
What is happening is that the user while creating PO is not at all selecting correct asset code with reference to capital item, that has a huge effect on asset accounting..
please provide

Hello,
As such there is no standard thing available, but there is one thing that you can do, that is
Create a PO document type for Assets and for that document type allow only account assignment A and delete rest including standard account assignment that is blank.
This way, once a person choose the document type for Assets, he will have to give the account assignment A.
Regards
Prabhjot Singh

About account assignment group in Sales Order.

Hi gurus,
I am working in SD for the first time and I am facing below problem
1. Material code was created with account assignment group (MVKE-KTGRM) as blank (Sales Org 2 view)
2. Later this material was entered in Sales Order.
3. Subsequently Sales Order BOM and Production Order were made against this material.
4. We maintained account assignment group in material master after creation of Sales order but account assignment group was not updated in Sales Order.
5. Now the field is gray out or non-editable is there any way by which we can maintain account assignment group in the sales order.
6. As the field is non editable we are unable to do Invoice by VF01.
Is there any way by which we can maintain account assignment group in Sales Order??
Edited by: Deepak Kulkarni on Mar 6, 2012 2:09 PM

Hi
As you have mentioned that you have maintained the acct assignment grp in the material master after the order was created, it will not appear in the sales order item already created and it will only reflect in new orders and changes to existing orders for that material.
Proposed solution:
If it is order related billing that you are doing, then goto VA02 and delete and re-enter the item with same material and qty.
The account assignment group will appear.
If the item is delivery related and if the delivery has already been created but PGi not done, then delete the delivery and then delete the item in the sales order and re-enter the item as told above. If PGI also done, then reverse the PGI, delete the delivery and re-enter as suggestd in above scenarios.
The account assignment group will appear in the billing document document tab in item level.
Regards
Madhu

Addl Account assignment in Sales order

We are in Make-to_order Scenario.
Following is an item which as generated from a SD invoice:
marketing and management Free : 1300
In the additional account assignment data, sales order = 1500989
Cost centre & Internal order fields are blank.
Can I assign a default Cost centre for this GL account through OKB9 ? Will it work ?

Hi Nikki
Cost center does not work for revenue accounts... You can assign IO in the additional acct assignments tab
However, by default the account assignment is to PSG if you have COPA activated
br, Ajay M

GTS 7.2 - Error with account assigned purchase order without material

All,
I am creating an account assigned purchase order without any material master in the feeder system (ECC 5.0) and it a standard SAP functionality.
I am getting the following GTS related pop up message and documents are posted to technically incomplete documents in GTS 7.2.
"Legal Control: Custs Prod. Mast. Required
Material "
Any ideas on how get rid of this error message
Edited by: James Puzon on Oct 3, 2008 9:32 PM

James,
Even though material numbers are not mandatory on POs in the feeder system (ie in ECC) they ARE mandatory in SAP-GTS.
This means that every line item (PO, SO, delivery) that is sent to GTS for compliance screening or Customs processing MUST have a material number in the feeder system. You have a couple of options to resolve this:
1. Always use a material number on all transactions that you enter in your feeder system if they are exports or imports (ie relevant for GTS). You can create service materials or "dummy" materials in ECC for items such as user manuals, warranties or installation services that are part of a particular shipment.
2. You can add logic in the interface for GTS to always transfer a particular material number to GTS if the material number is blank on the line item of the feeder system document. Ideally you would want to link this custom logic to a custom maintenance table in ECC so that you can easily change the material number that is sent to GTS without having to change the code.
3. Override the error message by changing the message type to a warning or informational message (not recommended because this would require a small code modification because I don't think the message type is configurable for this error). Even if you did make this code change you would likely run into more issues in GTS because license determination and other GTS services need a material number to function properly.
Hope this helps.
Sascha

PO account assignment : blank vs P vs Q

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for