PO Confirmation - At header level

HI Experts,
Can we configure PO Confirmation at header level??
Regards,
Jackie

Hi,
There is no option to configure at header.
Thanks

Similar Messages

Error in confirmation of Transfer orders at Header level (TC LRF2)

Hello All,
A transfer order has single item. It has got confirmed at the item level for the full quantity. The confirmation switchbox at item level is checked in by the system automatically. But in header level the switch box is not checked in.
While trying to confirm the Transfer order at header level, the error message shows that the Transfer order is already confirmed. But the Transfer order still exists in LRF2.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Sasi.

Hi Marcos
Note 566995 is an old correction note, which is probably already implemented on your system but it describes the standard system design regarding confirmations posted in mass processing transactions:
When you enter an operation confirmation via the order info system or the mass processing the system now sets the confirmation type to 'Automatic final confirmation' as well as the indicator 'Post open reservations'. Thus the system automatically generates a final confirmation when you confirm the whole planned quantity and the operation receives status CNF (finally confirmed) instead of PCNF (partially confirmed).
System is designed that way because a mass processing transaction will be generally executed in background mode and a huge number of confirmations can be posted at the same time. Therefore, user will not be able to enter any value to the confirmation.
If you don't want this behaviour you could use the BAPI
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_HDR to develop your own mass processing transaction to post confirmations.
BR
Caetano

Shipment confirmation IDOC interface : update fright condition header level

iam using the following IDOC type to update the shipment qty and post the PGI on outbound delivery note.
Message type :: WHSCON
Process code : IDOC_INPUT_DELVRY
I will get a freight charge on IDOC but SAP does not provide any standard segment and code to update or inset the fright on the delivery.
Can you please help me to identity what is the best way to insert the fright condition from IDOC to delivery condition ? any function module available for this?
also i need to split the delivery bases on the number of items shipped , any unshipped items goes to new delivery.
it would be grateful if anyone can provide sample code?

any one can pls provide me .how to update the delivery with fright charge at header level? is there any FM or BAPI to do so?

Sale order close at header level

Hi
How can I cose a sale order completely at header level having more than one line items so that no schedule line can be used for delivery.
Regards
Rajesh

Dear Mr.G. Lakshmipathi
Thanks for your answer.I know this option but it does n't fulfill my requirement.
There are more than one sale orders of the same material at a time for different customers having daywise schdule.System confirms the complete qty.in sale order used in first.While I need partely qty.to be sale to the other customer also.How can I transfer the qty.confirmed in first sale order to other sale order.
Thanks
Rajesh

Deletion of the Purchase order at the item level and header level

Hi Gurus,
We are using SRM 7.0 system.
In standard SRM 7.0, the PO can be deleted at header level and at line item level. I need to know the differnce between these deletions. I found that if the PO is deleted at the line item level the deletion indicator (DEL_IND) field in BBP_PDIGP table is 'X'.
But i could not find any clue to find the PO which is deleted at the header level. I need to code this logic in a report .
Kindly provide your valuable inputs.
Thanks,
RK

There are two ways:
1. From the Header by clicking the DELETE button. And this is only possible when the PO is not yet output to Vendor.
2. The second way is to delete all the items in the PO. This is possible any time irrespective of the output sent to the vendor. But provided if there are no follow-on documents for this.
Some times we could see the Deletion icon active in Header , it is because there is change version existing.
When a PO is created and ordered, this is the first version of the PO. And this PO is sent to the backend and output is sent to
the vendor.
Now when you make a change and hold it, SRM creates the 2ndversion of this PO. Then when you delete this PO, SRM marks this 2nd
version of PO to closed. Also you receive the pop-op confirmation that PO was deleted at this point. However, this PO deletion is never sent to the backend and output is not sent to the vendor since this PO has never been ordered. This version is the Change Version. This is shown after the PO number field if you pay attention on the screen.
When you search for the PO, it will show you the ordered PO (No change version shown after the PO number). The system does not show you the deleted version which is version 2. That is why you see status is 'ordered'.

Two production orders at the header level one for one single requirement

Hi Gurus, Please provide me your valuable suggestion on the issue.
*Client wants to have a only two production orders at the header level one for one single requirement .*
1) Manufacturing Order u2013 In this order for Finsihed prodcut system should pick all the assemblies whcih are manufactured inside i.e depending on the material type.\
2) Assembly order u2013 In this order system should pick all the assemblies whicih need to be assembled also procured or subcontracted items in this order against depending on the material type.
It means for Sales order of 5 EA there is going to be only 2 order ( MFG & assy order).
For Example.
L45-7000 is the header material now client wants only two production orders one Manufacture order and anothe Assmebly order , thet dont want to use Phantom assembly concept and also multiple production orders for SFG.
Please confirm if this requirement can be mapped in SAP ?
Thanks...

Hi Shishir,
As soon as each order is related to only one material, if your manufactured (or purchased) assemblies are of different materials, you will have a separate order for each material rather than a single order for all manufactured assemblies. I don't thing all your assemblies are of the same material - thus I would say no, it is not possible to map your requirement.
Regards,
Sergiy

How to change status in status profile at header level in background

Hi,
I have customized the standard sales order screen with status profile at header level.
In that, I have set the check boxes as created, delivered, approved and rejected.
The requirement is, whenever the order is created through VA01, need to check the order as 'Created' one in the status profile.
It is not possible for the user to mark this one manaully. I think, this can be done via only exits.
Please confirm this and how this can be proceed.
Thanks,
Thiyagu

For maintaining header conditions, Choose Header--> Conditions from menu bar.
For maintaining Delivery address, first select your Item, then click on "Truck" icon. Here you can maintain your delivery address.
Similarly, Header Texts and Item Texts will be maintained in Header> Texts, Item> Texts from the Menu Bar.
Regards,
Umakanth

PO Delivery tolerance at header level

Hello Gurus,
My client wants to have delivery tolerance at header level which means while doing GR system should accept over delivery for the total qualtities of all line items of a singel PO. Please let me know how this can be achieved?
Srinag

Underdelivery and overdelivery tolerances in purchase orders
You can change underdelivery and overdelivery tolerances in purchase orders at material level and at SKU level. As long as you have entered tolerances in the purchasing info record, the system will copy them as default values to purchase orders. Changes in underdelivery and overdelivery tolerances in purchase orders are made according to the following logic:
In order to change underdelivery and overdelivery tolerances at material level, enter the values that have been changed for an item in the detail view in the fields Underdel. tol. and Overdeliv. tol. If you change the tolerance values at material level, all the SKU default values that were copied from the purchasing info record to the purchase order without manual processing will be adjusted to the new percentage.
To change underdelivery and overdelivery tolerances at SKU level, enter the changed values of the appropriate SKU in the detail screen ( in the standard toolbar to the right of the table view). With the confirmation of your changes the system sets the indicator MT (manually set tolerances), which prevents this SKU tolerance value from being overwritten by a material tolerance value. Manually changed values at SKU level therefore remain unaffected by changes at material level.
PO Delivery tolerance at header level ,you have to make some alternate arrangment i.e. through user exit

Aggregating on header-level only

Hi experts,
I'm facing the following scenario:
I've got an infoprovider which contains item-level keyfigures.
The correspoding headers have keyfigures which cannot be disaggregated to the items.
It would not be a problem to provide a header-level infoprovider,
and an item-level infoprovider, but I cannot find a way to bring both sources together
in the same query.
A concrete example:
The header-level infoprovider contains the confirmed quantity of an production-order.
The item-level infoprovider contains the component-materials used by this prod-order and it's quantity.
In the target report I'd like to see the confirmed quantity of a prod-order as well as the components-level.
The problem is, that if I provide the prod-order-quantity on the item-level, that they will be aggregated multiple-times (according to the number of components used by a prod-order).
Example:
Data:
ProdOrder     Component     Conf.Qty     CompQty
111     X     10     3
111     Y     10     2
112     X     10     1
Wanted result, when aggregated on ProdOrder-Level:
111     10     5
112     10     1
Actual result, when aggregated on ProdOrder-Level:
111     20     5
112     10     1
Is there any way to solve that?
I'm still fighting with the idea of exception-aggregation, but it seems as if I had not understood the concept yet.
Best regards,
Marco

Hi AL,
that's correct, and works quite good as long as I have got the prod.order in my drilldown.
What I unfortunately did not describe: I need the "first value" of each prod-order-component cummlulated...
So to correct my initial need:
Wanted result, when aggregated on ProdOrder-Level:
111     10     5
112     10     1
Wanted result, when aggregated completly:
20     6
In the way you described, I'll get
10 6
because always the "first value" is displayed and no summation is done anymore (for that keyfigure)

Purchase Order Total Amount at Header level and Report Execution

Dear Experts,
Here by i am facing problem with Purchase Order Total amount.
I have local Pricing Procedure for price stipulations (like discounts, Freight, packaging). the calculation at item level is correct. tax calculation is done by tax code. The total PO Price is including all items in PO and tax amount. But at header level conditions net value is showing only gross price.
How to pick up total price including tax amount at header level conditions?
Please provide me solution on it ?

Dear Experts,
Here by i am facing problem with Purchase Order Total amount.
I have local Pricing Procedure for price stipulations (like discounts, Freight, packaging). the calculation at item level is correct. tax calculation is done by tax code. The total PO Price is including all items in PO and tax amount. But at header level conditions net value is showing only gross price.
How to pick up total price including tax amount at header level conditions?
Please provide me solution on it ?
Edited by: Kiran Mujumdar on Feb 23, 2009 7:08 PM

PO number prints only if it is at header level not for item level

Hi All,
I am not able to print the PO number in my order acknowledgement and COA printout when I enter the PO number in the sales order at item level of only. It prints fine when it is at the header level.
Please assist.
Thank you,
Shanu Jain

Hi,
BSTKD Field in the VBKD is dependent on two things . IF the Header PO Number is same as the Item number if u change at Header level it will be changed at all items level also. If both are diff then if u change the PO Number at Header level it will change PO numbers of the Items which is having same value as Header Po Number otherwise it wont change the Item PO Number .
Ex " Order Number 1000 is having PO Number at Header Level is PO1. And the sales order is having Item 010 and 020.
IF Item 010 and 020 is having PO1 at item level if u change the value of PO1 at header Level if will be applicable to items 010 and 020.
If Item 010 is having Po Number PO1 and 020 is having PO2, if i change value of PO number at header to PO3 then it will change Item 010 PO Number to PO3 and Item 020 PO Number will be same as PO2.
Try to Take The VBKD - BSTKD where Item Number POSNR is blank that means Header PO Number .
IF u want Item Po Number then pass the item number in POSNR and get it.
Regards,
Srinivas.

Additional Data in Header Level for ME51N / ME52N / ME53N

Dear Gurus,
I have one requirement related to apply enhancement for additional fields in purchase requisition header level.
After searching a lot , I dint found any solution for this.
Does anybody have any solution for this.
Regards,
Shibashis.

I need to add on Tabstrip "Account assignment" for fields
CO Area and Cost Center text field description ( right side ) for each one.
How can I do this? Thanks in advance.

Billing plan (Downpayment) for saved and open sales orders at header level?

Hi gurus,
I have configured billing plan in my SD environment at Item Level.
I want to change it to header level.
Questions:
1- When I make the changes to update the system to have billing plan at header level for future sales orders, is that possible for me to change all my saved orders and open orders with the new settings so that I can also have those saved and open orders with a billing plan at item level?
2- If that scenario is not possible, could we for example copy the data of a previously saved or open sales order into a new sales order with the new customizing (Billing plan at Header level?)
Thanks for your input
Kind regards
Chris

Hi
I am afraid you cannot do that converstion for the existing orders. BP at header level are enabled at teh document type level, while BP at item level is done at item category. So both are independent. Mostly it is advisabel to use BP at item level only.
If you are already using item level BP, and want to mvoe to header BP, then only future transactions can be executed with BP at header level. Existing item level BPlans will remain so in the system.

How to print material document in header level?

Hi Guys,
How to print material document from header level. I can only print them in item level. But i want that in header level. For example, I have 4 movements inside a material document and I want to issue only one output from the header level.
I can see the option Goto -> Additional Function -> output, but it is disabled. Please let me know hot to acheive this and if you need further info on this. Please throw some light on this.
Thanks
Yasin.

HIi
Your question is not clear. What exactly you want to be.
1. To print material header in your smart form / Sap Script what is the problem. Itu2019s quite easy you can do it. Let me know what problem you are facing.
2. The option is disables because of business functionality ask your functional guys to help you on the same.
Regards
Swati

To be able to report by business area at a header level

Business area reporting at a header level in Procurement/AP Subject Areas
At present client is doing a large number of manual lookups in Excel to add Business area detail to certain OBI procurement reports. Reasons for why we are having to do this includes that the report is written at a header level but the business area detail is stored at a distribution level or the document has no distribution lines.
What client would therefore like is for us to devise solutions that would allow us to include the business area detail. Possible solutions that I can think of include doing a join between the employee name, preparer name and requestor name to the HR business area detail, and the way that the ‘Procurement and Spend - Employee Spend’ joins the employee name and approver name to the business area fields maybe something that you can review as a solution.
I am hoping that you can come up with a number of solutions which we can then explore in further detail.
The key subject area that we would like this business area detail to be available in is the ‘Financials - AP Transactions’ area but if would certainly be beneficial to have in the ‘Procurement and Spend - Purchase Orders’ and ‘Procurement and Spend - Purchase Requisitions’ subject areas as well if it is feasible.
Can any plz.. guide the possible soultions we can do with this CR
Edited by: user13050518 on May 11, 2010 7:40 AM

Bonjour,
Je suppose vu votre prénom que vous parlez français lol bien que l'anglais ne me pose pas de problème.
En fait, il s'agit de plusieurs factures (avec différentes business area) pour un même fournisseur.
Au moment de la F110, le système comptabilise le paiement via une seule pièce mais avec plusieurs postes (un par business area) et la contrepartie le compte banque.
La case n'est pas cochée pour le champ T001-XGSBE donc je ne pense pqs que le problème provienne de là.
Cdlt

PO Confirmation - At header level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for