PO created with Unknown Accounting Assgn in BE in SRM 3.0 classic scenario

Hi Experts,
When a Limit Shopping cart is created with known Account assign Cat ( cost center - L ) and cost distribution BY VALUE then it is creating a PO in the backend sys with UNKNOWN ACCOUNT ASSgn Cat ( U ) .
Can any one tell me how to change this value to Known account assgn cat in the backend sys ?
What is the Badi to find where it is exactly changing the value ?
I tried in below Badi's
BBP_ACCCAT_MAP_EXP and BBP_TARGET_OBJECTS but here I can see the value is comming Correctly ...
Please advise me ....

Note 848894 - SCL: Account assignment changed from Known to Unknown
BUYER ACTION
You create a limit shopping cart by selecting the option Account assigment 'Known' and place the cart on hold.
You execute the check status transaction, expand the item and click on the detail of the item.
Go to the change mode and order the cart. The Account assignment status is set to 'Unknown'.
check it up. this note is applicable for you since BBPCRM400 .
check this too
Note 656859 - Limit item /account assignment known is reset
Muthu

Similar Messages

Problem with Unknown account assignment with limit order...reply soon...

Hello All,
i am facing problem in confirming the limit order with unknown account assinment.We are using Extended classic scenario with SRM version 5.00 and ECC 6.00. When creating shopping cart with unknown account assignments, shopping carts is getting created fine but when processing goods receipt the system only prompts for distribution by cost center and we do not have the option to selected processing against other account assignment e.g. internal order or network. the Cost center is coming as gray.What i am expecting that as in known account assignment it asks for a drop down and user can select cost center or order the same should happened with unknown account assignment. we have not implemented any badi for the same.
please help me out. Is this a standard behavior of shop with limit order for unknown account assignment where it prompts for cost center only or do i need to implement any badi.

Hi
Related links/ SAP OSS Notes to check out ->
Note 861889 - Limitations on limit and service PO's in case of ECS
Note 1046593 - Limit PO - Unable to delete and create new item
Note 966323 - Service Item: Not able to create PO in ERP backend
Note 969077 - LIMIT:SC with Account Assignment Unknown and IR_IND checked
Note 1000184 - Account assignment error when document transfer to back end
Note 1052892 - Account Assignment not visible for Limit Shopping Cart
Note 933618 - Multiple account assignments for limit item are lost
Re: Limit PO(Item category D instead of B)
SE 518 No account assignment exists for service li ne 0000000000
Creating SC with Dummy Account Assignment
Re: Account assignment on SRM
Re: Problem on account assignment
Re: Account details not coming while creating a Shopping Cart with Limit Item
LIMIT SC
Other related details ->
Use Screen variants (Transaction - SHD0) to change item overview and search result screens.
BADI - There is one BADI to hide/show some SC item creation links, there is one BADI to control screen details of PO, CTR... but not SC (and not external screens).
So, as usual, identify the template and change the HTML code in SE80.
To implement a more complex logic, like the default check box, change the ABAP code (usually in the PBO), if required.
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

SRM 7.0: Classic Scenario no PO is created only PR is generated

Hi Gurus,
I am working on SRM 7.0 - Classic scenario.
When a shopping cart is complete in terms of price, vendor (assigned) and other required data, item stays in transfer process.
If a SC is incomplete a PR document is created in backend without a problem but when a complete SC is oredered, the status of shopping cart remains I1111 i.e. item in transfer process. I can see in table BBP_PDBEI, backend object type (BE_OBJECT_TYPE) is correctly selected as BUS2012 and the document number of PO is also correctly selected.
This is the case even for the SC ordered using catalog materials.
I have checked following configuration and it seems to be ok.
1. 'Define objects in backend system's
2. Number ranges definition in SRM and ECC
3. Document type attribute -BSA in PPOMA_BBP
Configuraiton wise everything seems to be, I tried to manually transfer the SC using FM BBP_REQREQ_TRANSFER but it does not change the status of SC it remains I1111
RZ20 does not show any error for the SC with status I1111.
Is there any sepcial FM to push the SC in SRM 7.0?
Any help/tips would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Amit

Hi Amit
what is the setting here
1. 'Define objects in backend system's
is it a prefered vendor or fixed vendor
update the partner function in bbp_pd here
if it is 39 - you wil recive pr
it is 19 you will get PO
i am afraid , you stated that catalog sc stoo this problem but during debugging check what is the partne rfunction...
there can be several reasons for creating PR instead of PO. Please see the FAQ note 1173815 for the possible reasons, and the guide for debugging under:
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/SRM/Howtoanalyzethefollow-ondocumentdetermination
MOREOVER NOTE SAYS POSSIBLE REASONS ..
Note 336658 - Purch req instead of purch order created in backend
BR
Muthu

SRM 7 PPS Classic Scenario with Plan Driven Procurement?

Hello experts, I want to know if the combination of SRM 7 PPS Classic Scenario with Plan Driven Procurement is possible? or if there any limitation to consider? Our client needs to create purchase requisition in ERP -> send this purchase requisitions to SRM (as shopping carts) create bids - > quotations - > create contract from accepted quotations and then from the contract we need to create purchase order but this one must be created in ERP (classic scenario) Someone has experimented the same situation? Best regards and thanks for your Help.
Liam

Hi Lima ,
Classic scenario wont support PPS .
        - Stand alone and classic scenario not supported
        - Shopping cart renamed to Purchase Requisition
        - Shopping cart generate (pre)commitment in funds management
        - Contract can create Funds Reservation (Earmarked Funds) in Funds Management as a Guarantee
        - Goods Receipt and Invoice created in ERP
        - Mixed PO: PO with lines that works like contract lines, a PO can be created from these lines
        - PO created from contracts or mixed-PO is named call-off PO. Only is a new name, is a "normal" SRM      PO
        - Goods receipt possible in SRM only in "easy" cases
Thanks & Regards
Pradeep Kumar Dondeti

Sent mail mailbox not created with IMAP account

Hello,
I have an old PBG4 running Tiger that i use as a shop/travel/etc. 2nd mac. I have 4 mail accounts. I set them up ( successfully) all the time on various macs and windows machines.
But now something's changed... 3 of my accounts are fine. The 4th shows no "this account" airplane icon mail folder under "sent" int he left hand pane. i even deleted it, re-created it, and its STILL not there. Mail is also not stored to the IMAP server. Yes, in the tab it says "save sent mail to the server..."
At the bottom of the left hand mailbox pane, the "this account" set of mailboxes does appear with a little world/beach-ball to it left. There is a sent mail box there, but it does nto have any (recent) mail in it - just older sent items.
I'm flummoxed. Any idea what is going on? While you're at it, what's the difference between the mailboxes at the *top* and the duplicate at the bottom?
TIA!
Grant

So, VFEMail doesn't show up under sent, but has a Sent box within it below?
I wonder if you quit Mail andin the Finder make a copy of say...
/Users/YourUsersName/Library/Mail/[email protected]@imap.gmail.com/[Gmail]/Sent Mail.imapmbox and dragged it to
/Users/YourUsersName/Library/Mail/[email protected]@imap.VFEmail.com/[Gmail]/
If that'd work?
Hmmm, did we try this yet?
Not certain, but this can fix myriad Mail problems...
Safe Boot from the HD, (holding Shift key down at bootup), it will try to repair your Disk Directory while the spinning radian is happening, so let it go, run Disk Utility in Applications>Utilities, then highlight your drive, click on Repair Permissions, then move these folder & file to the Desktop.
Move this Folder to the Desktop...
/Users/YourUserName/Library/Caches/Mail/
Move this file to the Desktop...
/Users/YourUserName/Library/Mail/Envelope Index
Reboot.

Security Idenitity 2.0 Email Confirmation Token Create with one account validate with a different account

Howdy,
I extended the security model and made it multi-tenant, however when I create a email confirmation token in the admin tool, when I try and validate it, in one of the applications, it fails. In the admin tool, I create a UserManager with all of
the settings as if it were the application, but when the validation occures in the application it still fails. The only way I can get it to work, is if I use the same app pool for both the application and the admin, or if I set the user account of both
app Pools to the same service account. How can I get it to work where I create a token in one app, and validate in another app? Could I use impersonation? Is there something I can do to the two service accounts to allow one to generate
a token and the other to validate?

Let's see if I can answer these in order...
1. We built several web applications using MVC 5.2, EF 6.0, Idenity 2.0
2. We are using MS Visual Studio 2013, running on VM with Windows Server 2008 R2, .NET 4.5.1
3. The problem is we want to have each application have a different service account to make them more secure. We have an admin tool that allows us to add new applications to the Membership database, and new users to those applications. The
problem occurs when I create an email security token in the admin tool, and send it to the use who is then validated on the specific application. If I make the service account of the application and the admin the same it works, if not it fails.
I don't think the code is the problem, as it works fine if the service account for the application and the admin are the same. It only fails when I use seperate service accounts, but here you go.
Admin snippet:
Manage Controller - RegisterUser
varuser =
newApplicationUser()
{ UserName = model.UserName, Email = model.Email, IsActive = model.SelectedIsActive, IsPswdChgRequired = model.SelectedIsPswdChgRequired, TenantId = model.TenantId };
UserManager<ApplicationUser,
int> um = CreateUserManager(Convert.ToInt32(model.SelectedTenantId));
private UserManager<ApplicationUser, int> CreateUserManager(int TenantId)
 var provider = new Microsoft.Owin.Security.DataProtection.DpapiDataProtectionProvider(GetTenantName(TenantId));
 UserManager<ApplicationUser, int> um = new UserManager<ApplicationUser, int>(new ApplicatonUserStore(new ApplicationDbContext()) { TenantId = TenantId });
 um.UserTokenProvider = new Microsoft.AspNet.Identity.Owin.DataProtectorTokenProvider<ApplicationUser, int>(provider.Create("EmailConfirmation"));
Application snippet:
AccountController - constructor
var
provider =
newMicrosoft.Owin.Security.DataProtection.DpapiDataProtectionProvider(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["TenantName"]);
 userManager.UserTokenProvider =
newMicrosoft.AspNet.Identity.Owin.DataProtectorTokenProvider<ApplicationUser,
int>(provider.Create("EmailConfirmation"));
public async Task<ActionResult> ConfirmEmail(string userId, string ecode, string scode)
 if (userId == null || ecode == null || scode == null)
 return View("Error");
 var result = await UserManager.ConfirmEmailAsync(Convert.ToInt32(userId), ecode);
 if (result.Succeeded)

Logged in with unknown account apple app store?

I got the alert on my mac that there were updates for my mac in the app store, so I opened the app store and there I got the notice "There are updates for other accounts, Log in with <email> to perform the updates from this account" (translated from Dutch), but the e-mail address in this alert is not my e-mail address nor is it the e-mail address from anybody I know!
I know for a fact that nobody has been on my computer, not by my knowledge at least (and I live alone). How is this possible? Is it possible that this is an error coming from Apple? I'm kind of affraid for the security of my Apple Account and my MacBook.
Thanks.

A stranger's Apple ID appears on your Mac in conjunction with an update notice

Limit cart unknown Account Assignment Not picking Approval email id

Hi All,
when i am trying to create a Shopping cart with unknown Account Assignment, at first instance approval email id is not picking. When i made some changes in the item data (say Descrtiption ) it is picking the approval email id. in SRM
We are SRM 5 to 7 upgrade, In SRM 5 there is a note to 974239 which will solve the issue. But the note is valid forSRM 7 EHP3 Version.
Can any one help me in giving the latest note.
Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
Charan M

Hi
Related links/ SAP OSS Notes to check out ->
Note 861889 - Limitations on limit and service PO's in case of ECS
Note 1046593 - Limit PO - Unable to delete and create new item
Note 966323 - Service Item: Not able to create PO in ERP backend
Note 969077 - LIMIT:SC with Account Assignment Unknown and IR_IND checked
Note 1000184 - Account assignment error when document transfer to back end
Note 1052892 - Account Assignment not visible for Limit Shopping Cart
Note 933618 - Multiple account assignments for limit item are lost
Re: Limit PO(Item category D instead of B)
SE 518 No account assignment exists for service li ne 0000000000
Creating SC with Dummy Account Assignment
Re: Account assignment on SRM
Re: Problem on account assignment
Re: Account details not coming while creating a Shopping Cart with Limit Item
LIMIT SC
Other related details ->
Use Screen variants (Transaction - SHD0) to change item overview and search result screens.
BADI - There is one BADI to hide/show some SC item creation links, there is one BADI to control screen details of PO, CTR... but not SC (and not external screens).
So, as usual, identify the template and change the HTML code in SE80.
To implement a more complex logic, like the default check box, change the ABAP code (usually in the PBO), if required.
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Undeleting a PO line item with multiple account assignment and PO history

I am getting error message
PO history already exists (Multiple account assignment not possible)
Message no. MEPO841
When attempting to undelete a purchase order line item that has GR (nonvaluated) and Invoice postings.
Sequence of events.
PO line item was created with mutlitple account assignments ( 50/50 distribution) and GR nonval flags on.
Invoice Posted (blocked for payment)
GR done
PO line item marked for deletion.
Now getting MEPO841 when attempting to undelete.
Tried to Reverse GR and cancel material docuement - unable to do so - message no selectable items in PO
(even with check zero indicator )

Hello Dan ,
Error message MEPO 841 is only issued if you have Multiple account assignment function (MAA) activated. Multiple account assignment function is a new business function developed in Release 604.
If you have MAA active, you are not allowed to change a single account assigned PO which has GR posted to a multiple accounts assigned PO. If this is tried , MEPO 841 will stop you from doing this change.
If you want to have your old functionality in the lower release, you should switch off the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 ( MM Multiple Account Assignment ) in Release 604.
Please switch the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 off in test environment and test the problem again in a productive system.
I hope this information has been helpful in solving your problem. Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Frank Farinella

Invoice Posting with two accounting documents for Service PO

Hi Gurus,
We have created one service (GR based Invoice verification) PO for which we have assigned a costcenter which has been created for different company code(rather than what company code we have mentioned in PO).
Now during Invoice creation out of 6 invoice entries only one Invoice has been created with two accounting documents for two different company codes, when we found this and canceled the same only basic entries has been reversed.
I just wanted to know how this single invoice has been created with two different accounting documents for two different company codes.
Please guide me in this regard.
Thanks and Regards,
Ravindra C.M

Hi Aasif,
Thanks for your reply, if that would have been case then each Invoice created for that PO should have two accounting documents but out of 6 invoice created only one invoice has been created with two accounting documents.
I am completely agree with you that it has posted as inter-company transfer but why only one invoice has been created with two accounting documents.
In addition to the above I just wanted to know if for GR-based invoice verified PO if we create a Invoice before creating service entry sheet whether two accounting documents will be created as we have mentioned different company code costcenter.
Please guide me in this regard.
Thanks and Regards,
Ravindra C.M

Unable to create confirmation/invoice in SRM,Classic Scenario

Hi Guru's,
I am unable to create Confirmation/Invoice in the Portal, attached the screen shot of the error
its is the problem with the ADRC table, there is no entry in the table for the BP.
I tried to access the table via SM30 to add the entry in ADRC manually, I get a message table maintenance not defined
Regards,
Kiran

Hi Kiran,
Could you please also advise whether all the users are not able to create the confirmation in portal. Or if there is any specific user who is not able to do that?
And I also request you to advise whether you going to do the invoice in SRM portal in classic scenario?
Best Regards,
Bharathi

Classic scenario: Update shopping cart with changes in backend PO?

The Shopper would like to have visibility in their shopping cart (SRM 5.0, classic scenario) of changes made to the follow-on PO created in ECC6. Is it possible for the cart to be updated with changes made to the backend document, or would the customisation for this type of request be too complex?
Any advice would be appreciated, thanks!

Hi,
Yes this report is reading the PO quantity and value and the history tab for follow-on documents such as GR or invoice.
Thus the SC history is updated.
Kind regards,
Yann
Message was edited by:
Yann Bouillut

We work with SRM 5 Ext' Classic & report based on organization plan

Hello expert,
We work with SRM 5 Extended Classic scenario and BW for reports.
We have a lot of purchasing types and we need a good report that can give as a clear picture of the purchasing process according to the organization units (departments). We have one purchase organization and a lot of purchase groups, and the way that the system is built doesnu2019t support this requirement. We need a report that is based on the organization plan.
For example:
We need the option to extract all HR unit purchase documents or all direct supply goods that are purchased by the supply chain department. The report also needs to give a clear picture of the purchase operations and costs of every unit.
Thanks,
Gil

Closed but Unanswered

Classic Scenario : Purchase Order failing to get created

Hi,
We are using SRM 5.0 classic scenario. We are only using SRM for classic scenario only. while trying to create the backend purchase order i get the following error "       Interval of number range object REQREQ does not exist: SC no. PO "
I have defined the number ranges for PO
Define Number Ranges for Shopping Carts and Follow-on Document
EC     3000000000     3009999999     3000000019   internal
Define transaction type : BUS2201 doc type ECPO
Description          Purchase Order
Int. Number Range         EC
Ext. Number Range         02
Status Profile
BTrans.Category      BUS2201
Description          Purchase Order
Partner Determ.Proc.
Text Schema          PO
Event Schema
In R/3
I copied NB transaction type into ECPO
Defined external number ranges
Thanks
Lebo

Hi
As Jagadish said,
1. In SPRO what is the number range you defined for PO in "Define Num range per Backend System for Follow-on doc".
bp - 10000 19999
lp - 20000 29999
for eg bp -is backend purchase order no ranage
         lp - is local purchase order no ranage
2. Then make sure above number range is maintained in "Define Num range per Shopping Cart and Follow-on doc" and it should be Internal num range.
            bacclnt100(backend logical syatem)    bp pr rs
              bp -backend po no range
              pr - purchase requst
              rs -reservation
3. this for r/3 classic po i.e bp
Description Purchase Order
Int. Number Range : BP
Ext. Number Range
Status Profile
BTrans.Category BUS2201
Description Purchase Order
Partner Determ.Proc.
Text Schema PO
Event Schema
4. define number range for local purchase orders
Description Purchase Order
Int. Number Range LP
Ext. Number Range 03
Status Profile
BTrans.Category BUS2201
Description Purchase Order
Partner Determ.Proc.
Text Schema PO
Event Schema
adding to Jagadish
since you are in classic scenario
a) one po number ranage for backend PO
b) another po number ranage for local PO - Why this is required means if it is ordered a direct local PO will be created SRM rather than R/3 system. this PO document type also must be mapped in r/3.
c) backend PO number ranage configuaration you can map in backend as external.
regards
muthu
Edited by: Muthuraman Govindasamy on Jun 4, 2009 10:33 AM

Local PO created in classic scenario

Hello,
We're on SRM 5.0 and we try to create a PO from an accepted bid.
For some reason however if the subtype of the external req. SC, from which the Bid Invitation was created, is DP (direct procurement) a Local PO is created insteed of a backend PO even though we use the classic scenario.
Did anyone else encounter this problem ?
kind regards
Pieter Serruys

Hi,
Pls check the foll setting in SPRO:
SRM server>Cross application settings>Define objects in the backend system.
Also,when creating PO from BID,you can define the system where you want to create the follow on doc to be created i.e. either in SRM or R/3 through the BADi "BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS".
HTH.
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

PO created with Unknown Accounting Assgn in BE in SRM 3.0 classic scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for