PO Price issue

Hi
I am facing following issue:
My company code currency is USD.
When I am creating a PO on Vendor (Order currency= INR) and Gross price = 10 INR , The price appearing in ME23N and In table EKPO is same ...i.e. 10 INR.
But when I am creating a PO on Vendor (Order currency= UF) and Gross price = 10 UF , The price appearing in ME23N and In table EKPO is not same ...Price in ME23N is 10 UFand Price in Table EKPO is 100 UF (original price multipled by 10)......
Can ypu please letme know why it is happening?
Regards
Ravi

UF is a currency without decimals, because of this and the fact that the EKPO price field is with decimals, SAP uses its own logic to store the value in this field.
check this thread:
Re: Currency decimal error
There is an OSS note about JPY currrency where SAP explains in detail the background.

Similar Messages

BAPI_PO_CREATE1 use in a loop - net price issue

Hi,
I'm using BAPI_PO_CREATE1 within a loop to create a PO with multiple items - grouped by vendor, plant and delivery date. After each BAPI call I use BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT with WAIT = 'X', further I track the results from BAPIRETURN into some kind of log. All my structures and internal tables used in the bapi interface are cleared/freed after each call in order not to have inconsistent data. I'm passing only 1 condition 'PBXX' with net price. I'm passing 2 records in the condition table - 1st with CHANGE_ID = 'D', and second one with CHANGE_ID = 'I'. Further, I set (no_price_from_po = 'X') and (memory_uncomplete = 'X')
At the tests I used the same material vendor and plant in all items and only delivery date is different in order to create few orders one after another. Even price is changed for each item.
First of my PO within a loop is created as expected - with correct price value, even if the combination material/plant is passed twise and the resulted PO have 2 items.
The issue I have is comming out at the next PO-s (2nd, 3th..) - the system returns error message:
E-218 Net price must be greater than 0
I stuck right here. Tried quite a lot of different screnarios without success. Further tried even different vendor/material/plant for the second PO. Checked also the forum posts before to consider to write this one - haven't found anything relevant which might be of any help.
Any ideas what is wrong?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ivaylo Mutafchiev

Hi,
in fact my price values were not so small - 2.15, 1.55, 2.45, etc... but nothing less than 1.00. Nevertheless, you pointed me to the right direction - to search OSS for the answer. OSS Note 571860:
https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=571860
helps me to find out what I missed in my scenario: I didn't set ITEM-NET_PRICE at all, just via condition table. Now, when I added the following:
item-net_price = some_price. itemx-net_price = 'X'.
item-po_price = '2'. itemx-po_price = 'X'. " <-- in fact, PO is created even without this line
all of my POs are created with correct prices from the input.
Problem solved.
Thanks!
Ivaylo

Price issue

Hi gurus,
I have an issue with pricing where material is maintained in CAS and alternative UoM is EA,
1 CAS = 6 EA defined in Material master.
PR00 = 20.99 per 1 EA, now in a sales order when I order the material in EA, the price that comes up is 21.09/EA and when it shows correct when in CAS.
Any help on this?
Thanks & Regards,
Pavan

You have to do couple of things to fix this problem:
1) Check the Pricing condition records (PR00).
tcodes:
VK11 -
Create
VK12 -
Change
VK13 -
Display
Make sure that there two condition records.
a) Condition record for CAS
b) Condition record for EA
2) Run the pricing analysis in sales order to track down the problem.

Moving Average price issue

Hello Experts,
My client one Semi Finished material maintained Price Control as S (Standard) with 13.5 and accounting documents posted with 13.5 only with standard price no issues and working fine. Now the issue is MAP (Moving Average Price) updated for the same Semi Finished material with 4860, I don't know how this figure has arraived. when I check in material master records no one updated manually. Now my client's finance controller is asking how that figure (4860) arrived ?.
I have checked in MSEG table and it updated the same 4860 only but material document posted with standard price only. I couldn't figure out how system arrived this amount (4860) ?,
it would be great helpful if you can through some light on this issue.

Dear Srinivasa,
Kindly check follwing things
1) Whether the material has got any goods receipt with higher value.
2) Whether the Future price is maintained for the material in Material master - Accounting view,with higher value and its validity
3) Check the changes happened in past related to MAP, in Material master MM03-> Display changes.
With regards,
Ajay Bhalekar

Credit memo price issue.

Dear Experts,
Issue:
When I am making Credit memo req with VA01 then price is coming but when I am enter creddit req to memo with the doc no in VF01 and execute then price is not coming, please let me know where i can do correction so that i can get the right output with price.
Its very urgent please response ASAP.
Thanks
Smith

Dear Raghu.k,
Thanks to all as per you all anyls found as mentioned below.
When I am check the condition in vf02 then the ZPR3(Manual in credit req memo) is coming in yellow sign. I dnt know why and whn I am double click on ZPR3 then at Control Option there is one option tab INACTIVE:(W)The document item is statistical.
I think if It will be active then ZPR3 will be green, would you please tell me where should I make conf or change it to get it active.
One more thing is there when I am check the condition at Header level then no C.type is there.
Please tell me the steps what should I do. its urgent plz
Thanks.
Smith

Material Costing: Moving Average Price Issue

Hi Experts,
I have a issue regarding the Moving Average Price of the Material computed by the system (indent sales process):
The Material was created with Purchased Price .74PO Price x 10 items = 7.4 Amt in LC Posted into the system (PGR).
But afterwards, they reversed the Material Document with the same Price .74PO Price x 10 items.
This had been done last 2009.
Come 2011, they created another indent sale -> PO ->PGR for this material, now the price is .12 PO Price x 10 items = 1.2 Amt in LC Posted. However, the moving average price was computed 0.77
How does the system comes up with this computation? Is there inconsistencies in the system?

Thanks @jurgen. I checked-double-checked in MR21, there are no change documents under the material.
in MR51, added one Issue Document:
Material           Material Description                     CoCd ValA
Type DocumentNo Itm Pstng Date          Quantity BUn     Amount in LC Crcy
2A1E8113-20        COVER SHIFT                              1100 1110
WE   5000003540   1 25.02.2011               10- PC             1.15- SGD
WE   5000003534   1 23.02.2011               10 PC             1.15 SGD
WL   4900020403   5 17.09.2009               10- PC             7.35- SGD
WE   5000001968   5 17.09.2009               10 PC             7.35 SGD
In S_P00_07000139:
Start date :        01.01.2009                         0 PC                   0.00 SGD
    Total goods receipt                            20 PC                   8.50 SGD
    Total goods issue                              20 PC                   8.50 SGD
End date   :        28.02.2011                         0 PC                   0.00 SGD
SLoc S Date       Reference Doc.   GR/GI Slip MvT           Receipt             Issue            Amount Balance quantity Price/Unit (Bal.)    Balance amount Comment
WH01 E 17.09.2009 PL001427         5000026286 101           10.000             0.000              7.35            10.000              0.74              7.35 GR for sales ord.st.
WH01 E 17.09.2009 1121010049       4900227144 601            0.000            10.000              7.35-            0.000              0.00              0.00 GD delivery sls ord.
WH01 E 23.02.2011 2002381          5000048052 101           10.000             0.000              1.15            10.000              0.12              1.15 GR for sales ord.st.
WH01 E 25.02.2011 2002381          5000048120 102            0.000            10.000              1.15-            0.000              0.00              0.00 GR f. sls.or.st. rev
Still it's not tallied with the MAP = .77 in Material Master.

Vendor Consignment Price Issue for short term Price Contracts with Vendors

Hi Gurus, We are using Consignment Process successfully but very recently we faced a problem on some of our vendors who change the price every quarter.e.g. when the Buyer cuts the Consignment PO for 1000 pieces and receive it in K stock for 10$ the price is valid for 3 months in the Info record when we start moving from K stock to Company stock after 3 months the price is changing in info record and consumption happening after 3 Months is causing issues as you all know there is NO PO history tracking for Consignment PO's except 101k movement.we could manually do the jugglery by NOT changing the Info record untill the full 1000 qty of the PO is received but the problem is if there are multiple PO's and if the consumption is pulling stock from 2 different PO's then we have issues
E.g. PO1 1000 Qty Info rec validity May 1st to july 31st 10$ per piece
PO2 500 Qty Info Rec Validity Aug 1st to Oct 31st 12$ per piece
First consumption 411k for 800 Pcs on june 25th happens with 10 $
Second consumption 411k for 600 Pcs happen on Sep10th will happen with 12$ but the vendor wants 200 out of 600 with 10$ and 400 with 12$ how do we handle this situation without manually changing the info record please advise
As Consumption and settlement happens in MRKO which is totally unlinked with the PO. Is there a way we can handle the situation. There could be multiple consignment PO's which bring stock in Consignment

Hi DP,
As SAP doesn't Support Delivery cost settlement with the consignment process to seprate G/L ( Similar to accruals ), you need to go for Z development which while posting MRKO will be executed with refernce to PO & Issue Document Posting the freight Value to Appropriate fright G/L .
Regards
Manish
Edited by: Manish Kumar on Nov 3, 2010 12:06 PM

KSII actual activity price issue

Hi All
I want system to calculate the activity price automatically after running KSII and should update it in KBK6 so that i can revaluate production order with actuals by running MFN1. Now i have done all the configuration required and my plan cost are getting updated after i run KSPI and same is getting update in KP26 and are also showing in KBK6 under plan cost nd can be seen in Cost center reports under plan cost. Problem is with actuals
I have been reading the forum regarding this issue and all the inputs given by experts is been checked but i think iam missing something either a step in calculating the actuals or may be some tick in configurations
Kindly let me know the solution for an issue iam facing .
Thanks in advance
Invin

Hi Surya
I had already done the setting in OKEW and all splitting structure configuration. Base on that my plan cost is been distrbuted in two different activities. Planning has been done in KP06 and after doing that only i ran the transaction KSPI.
But ya you got a point thats what iam feeling that there is some thing missing in my config settings which i already mentioned in my earlier posts.
What is the prb iam not able to recoganize kindly if you can give me some detailed information what could be the reason?
For your information i would like to tell briefly what i did so far:
1. IN configuration i defined splitting structure Say T1
2. then by selecting T1 i cllicked in assignment and assigned splitting rule say T10
3. then by selecting T10 i clicked on "Selection for assingment" in this screen i mentioned only one cost element say 55000000 in "from value" "to value" and in activity type i mentioned "from" 106010 "to" 106030
4. then i clicked back icon and selected "Splitting rules" which is T10 in my case and method i mentioned is "12- Activiy quanitity" and checkd the box called "Wt- Weighting Indicator"
5. then i selected my rule T10 and clicked on "Selection for rules" and here i mentioned my version that is 0
6. then i did config setting "Assign Splitting Structure to Cost Centers" over here i assined this rule to only one cost center say 31010401 in parameters i selected version radio box and entered 0 there
These all what i did in configuration settings
Now after this i did planning KP06 entered my cost center that is 31010401 and only mentioned my cost element which is 55000000 with my activity type 106010 and 106030 here i didn't took 106020 in consideration. Now these values are coming in my cost center plan report on debit side and then i ran KSPI cost got splitted in both the activiy types in credit side in planning section of cost center but the prb is the same which you know Actuals are not coming
Kindly put a light what could be the reason?
Thanks
Invin

Base price issue

Dear gurus,
In sale order, Item condition for Base price PR00 is not manual condition type and it cannot be changed manually in VA02 mode as we all know.
Here the issue is: the condition record for PR00 is maintained for a particular key combination and there is only one price for a single validity period. Moreover user does not have authorization for VK11 or 12. But there has been change made in base price and the same is shown in sales order Change log.
I tried all possible ways except debugging. Can anybody give some idea what could have went wrong.
Regards
Praveen.

Dear Praveen
pls consider the below example
condition type       : PR00 ( or anything)
condition record   : Rs 100/-
validity period        : Jan'ry 01st,2000 to Dec 31st, 2098. ( example)
Now, lets suppose
the business decides that this PR00 is changed ( increase or decrease) to Rs 140/- from Jan 10th, 2011.
Now, This is wat we have to do...
Do VK11
enter the c.type, new value & validity period.
The system will automatically consider the new value from jan10th, 2011.
I hope, I am clear.
Rgds
Sumanth.Gururaj
Consultant/Systems Analyst - SAP SD/MM

Material valuation(standard price issue)

Hi Gurus,
We have some issue in material master record accounting1 view.The standard price for the period 1 of 2010,period 2 of 2010 is showing the value of 1000 correctly.but where as coming to material valuation table(MBEW)it is showing as the value of "1".But where as coming to material ledger the standard price is showing as 1000 correctly.due to the inconsistency data between material valuation and material ledger the system is not allowing to post any transactions.Suggest on this issue.
Thanks in advance
Jana

Hi Janardhan,
The Material Valuation Table MBEW will be updated, if you have completed both Marked and Released activities for the Material through t-code-CK40N for Mass Materials or CK11N and CK24 for Individual Materials. As per your data, in your case this was completed and price was updated for 01 and 02-2010 periods. If you run CK40N-Standard Cost Estimate for Legal/Group/Profit Center valuation and completed till u201CMarking of Priceu201D i.e., but not executed the activity u201CRelease priceu201D. It may be for period 03-2010, the Material Master>Accounting view will be updated with standard price and also Material Master>Future Price field will be updated with u201CMarked Priceu201D, but Current Price/Previous Standard Price fields will show earlier values. Till you u201CRelease the Priceu201D through t-codes CK40N or CK24, this differences will continue. At the start of March 2010 period, if you u201CRelease the priceu201D, all the fields in Material Master will be updated with relevant Current/Previous Standard Price fields. I hope this will clear your doubts. If you need more clarity in this regard, please let me know.
Regards
appalas
Edited by: appalas on Feb 28, 2010 1:11 PM

Inforecord Net price issue JPY currency

Hi Experts
I am facing an issue in Inforecords Net price when net price is mainatined in JPY currency
The data maintained and as can be seen using ME13 for Net Price for example is 1 JPY
Where as when I fetch this data using EINE table the value is shOWNn as 0.01
( Same is the case when Net price is maintained as 232,687 JPY. In EINE table NET price field this is shown as 2326.87JPY
Please advice why the system behaviour is as mentioned above . Also how can we overcome this issue.
Thanks and Regards
Vikrant

This is because the field is technically defined as currency field with 2 decimals.
Please read OSS Note 53206 - Processing of currency fields.
it explains whatyou have to do in your programs

Unit price issues

HI!
In m my smartform Im getting the unit price for my invoice from the condition table directly instead of calculating it (Total / Quantity) which creates the rounding up issues. SO this works fine for us but the problem occurs when the condition pricing is like 300/ 1000 L or 4000/ 1000Kgs , what happens is that in the output the unit price and quantity when multiplied contradicts , though the net price per line item shows correctly but suppose qty is 3 L and the unit price is 300/1000L so total os .9 dollars which is correct but in the form out put it shows qty= 3 unit price 300 and total .9 dollrs, which si contracdictory, so what I did I used a calculation gaain and divided by condition price by condition pricing unit so when its 300/1000L it would show .3 /L which is now ok but another problem rose with metric ton, since the selling unit is MT and the unit price now after dividing by condition pricngi unit makes it per KG so output would show like qty =3 unit price 4 and total = 12000 dollars , so heer unit price is wrong as it should have been 4000/ Ton as the total os 12000 dollars.
Is theer a way out to show the correct unit pricing as per the sales unit. I had used the code to just divide the total price of line item divided by the Quantity but then the rounding up issues came up which was not required .
read table is_bil_invoice-it_kond into gs_kond
with key bil_number = gs_gen_del-bil_number
itm_number = gs_gen_del-itm_number.
if sy-subrc = 0.
g_unit_price = gs_kond-kbetr / gs_kond-kpein.
else.
** Loop around and get the price for it
loop at is_bil_invoice-it_kond into gs_kond
where bil_number = gs_gen_del-bil_number and
itm_number = gs_gen_del-itm_number.
    if gs_gen_del-fkimg <> 0.
         g_unit_price = gs_kond-kbetr / gs_kond-kpein.
      endif.
* g_unit_price = g_item_tot / gs_gen_del-fkimg.
    endif.
endloop.
endif.
* Get unit price and tot price.
g_item_tot = gs_gen_del-netwr - gs_gen_del-kzwi3.
*IF gs_gen_del-fkimg <> 0.
* g_unit_price = g_item_tot / gs_gen_del-fkimg.
*ENDIF.
thanks

Well we would ike to grab the unit price directly from the condition mentioned in the billing documents , thats the reason this issue has errupted , We would like to pull it directly from teh document onto the invoice but as I said when its given per 1000 L or /1000 Kgs then the problem occurs as teh quantity may be in MT and the unit price in the condition on document maybe like 4000 dollars per 1000 KGS so it takes 4000 and multiplies bny quantity which is in MT which is 1000 times more than teh correct value. SO as per my piece of code its grabbing the unit price directly from teh condition in the billing document . If I just divide this unit price that I am gettimng from the condition table in Doc by the condition rate KPEIN then it works ok except in few cases like MT. The quantity will show 3 MT suppose and the unit price will be 4000/1000 = $4/ kgs so this will contradict the units but in case of per 1000L it would be ok as the resultant will be in litres only but in case of MT its converted to Kgs so basically a client will see 3 MT QTY for 4 / Kgs and price will be 12000 dollars which dosent look alright though teh resultant is correct prioce.
SO this becomes a special case when we dont need to divide by condition unit rate . My question is can be give such kind of exceptions in our code and proceed or will be wrong.
Thanks

Price issue- reg

Hi Experts
We using subcontract addon. My Company doing sales business. What we did is purchase a raw material and make it as finished products and sell in the market. Sometime they give the raw material Outside for Subcontracting works. In this scenario I want Raw material price and Given subcontract price should be added for next stage in Production Order before completion. Now it cannot be added.
Solve my issue.
Thanks..
Balaji

Hi Balaji.....
Create a Labor type Service Item and put its valuation method as standard.
Define the Price of Subcontractor there in inventory tab of Item Master data
@Standard Production Order:
Create a Bill Of Material and map this Job work Charges Item at Child level along with RM.
Then follow the normal process of production.
@Special Production Order:
No Need to Create a Bill Of Material and map this Job work Charges Item at Child level along with RM direct at production level by selecting type Special.
Then follow the normal process of production.
This will give you the price combination to FG.
Try this in demo DB.......
Regards,
Rahul

Net Price Issue while creating PO w.r.t PR

Dear All,
While creating PO w.r.t PR, there is error given by the system as Net Price is not adopted. Net Price remains as zero. All the others details are automatically adopted.
Is there customization required so that Net Price is adopted from PR while creating the PO.
Please guide.
Regards,
Vikas

Hi,
Yes there is a way to fix this.
Please follow the steps below.
1) SPRO --> MM --> Purchasing --> Authorization Management --> Define Function Authorizations for Buyers
2) Maintain 01 function authorization or copy it to create a new one
3) Under General Parameters, Check Adopt PO Price.
4) If you would like PO to have reference objects as mandatory, uncheck W/o Reference Optional
5) Go to each buyers ID by SU01 --> Parameter. Enter EFB and enter the 2 codes that you defined in Step 2.
6) Log out then log back in
Now with that ID, when you create PR, under valuation, you have a new drop down button asking whether you would like to adopt the price in PO.
Kuber

Create Sales order with reference to a Billing Document - Net price issue

Hi Everyone,
The Billing Document has one line item with Net value of 16,000. However, when I create the Sales Order with reference to the Billing Document, the net price shows 64,000. When I check the Document flow of the Billing Document, there were two Contracts on top of my Billing Document. One is a contract with the overall status of "Being Processed" and this is where I checked the net value is 64,000. The next contract invoice is already completed (net value is 16,000).
Has anyone encounter such case? How would I be able to create the sales order with reference to the Billing document and have the net value of what is in the Billing Document (16,000). Which part of the configuration is setting this up. Thanks!

Hi,
This is a very rare case, if you are sure of the scenario, would suggest you two alternatives:
1) whenever you go against the flow of SAP, you have customize it, so its better you discuss this matter with your ABAP person.
2) never tried it out but you can:
you cannot see that in Billing Document that which is the sales document assigned to it, but to estblish that relationship,
we do copy control setting from Billing Document to Sales Order type (T.Code:VTFA).
Menupath: SPRO >> IMG >> Sales & Distribution >. sales >> Billing Document >> Copy Control >> Copy Control from Billing Document to Sales Order Type.
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Siddharth.

PO Price issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for