PO Response from SUS in SRM Notification.

HI All,
I have a scenario in SRM Client in which i need to trigger a workflow using a Badi "BBP_PCO_WFL_BADI" whenever there is a change in Quantity and Delivery Date requested in PO.
The standard workflow templates WS14500019, WS14500007, WS14500001 are disabled so that the approval from the agents (including Buyer) for the particular group is enabled.
I am stuck at How to validate the corresponding field for the quantity and the Delivery date between SRM and SUS PO and POR respectively and put the code in method START_WORKFLOW for the Implementaion in Badi.
I am only able to find following things from the SRM client:
Table used: bbp_pdigp
Fields:
Quantity: BBP_MNG Types DATS
Delivery Date: EINDT Types DATS
Can someone please help me out with the sample code or the logic for it?
Is it necessary to validate the fields or it can be checked in background using some workflow item?
Thanks
Rahul

Hi Saravanan,
In Method prameters, we have both PO GUID and PCO GUID also, all we need to do is to get the values at each line item, compare quantity, compare delivery date to ensure whether we need to start workflow or not.
In the method START_WORKFLOW, how am i going to compare (logic) compare Quantity and Delivery date in Purchase Order and POS.
can you please specify the corresponding fields and the table which i need to compare for the corresponding PO and POR as i am unable to find it for the POR to be compared.
Thanks
Rahul

Similar Messages

ERROR in Invoice posting from XI to SRM in MM-SUS plan driven procurement

Hi
We are implementing MM-SUS plan driven procurement scenario. MM version is 4.7. we are using Z-Program to trigger Invoice i-doc from MM to XI. its reaching XI but from XI to SRM there is some error.
the error is DYNAMIC_CALL_FAILURE
Function call failed; could not find the function BBP_PD_SUSIV_GETLIST Programm: SAPLBBP_BD_DRIVER_SAPXML1; Include: LBBP_BD_DRIVER_SAPXML1U20; Line: 63
any help is appericiated.
Thanks,
Arvind

Hi Arvind,
From Xi to SRM, by the looks of it, you are calling a BAPI. Can you specify how is your scenario configured ?
If it is a BAPI, can you also try to test it(on the SRM box itself) from the Function Module test tool?
Pls let us know the results/details.
cheers
danus

Purchase Order Response Not able to do by the Supplier from SUS

Hi Experts,
During sometimes, the supplier is not in a position to make POR from SUS.
After selecting the PO from Supplier side, when they are trying to do POR they are not able to either select Confirm (tick mark) or reject (X mark) from their screen which means always those buttons are in greyed mode or no action like Green or Red respectively. What could be the reason ? However, they can see the Send button.
Please provide me the input to do investigation.
Thanks
Rajesh K

Hi Rajesh,
   If you are not able to respond for PO from SUS then you have to activate the workflow WS14500001.. Here some more workflows you can check for POR
Workflows
You can configure the following workflows for the purchase order response:
·        (WS14500001)
Automatic transfer of purchase order response data into the purchase order. The system carries out a comparison during the data transfer (background processing). If the quantity, price, and delivery date variances transmitted by the vendor are within the tolerance limits set in Customizing, and no other variances are transmitted, then the data transfer of the first inbound POR occurs automatically.
This workflow is relevant for XML receipt or manual entry with subsequent approval.
·        (WS14500019)
If POR data differs from that in the purchase order, you can be informed of this via a work item. As a purchaser, you can decide for each item whether you wish to transfer the data into the purchase order or not.
·        (WS14500007)
If POR data differs from that in the purchase order, you can be informed of this via e-mail (with the number of the purchase order).
·        (WS14500017)
Monitoring receipt of the purchase order response:
If the flag Purchase order response expected is set in the purchase order, and if by a certain time a purchase order response has not been received for all items in a purchase order, then you can be informed of this via a work item.
SAP WON'T DELIVER ANY WF TEMPLATE WITH NUMBER RANGE OF '9' BECAUSE 99% CUSTOMER USE NUMBER RANGE 9' FOR CUSTOM WORKFLOW..
Saravanan

App testing phase: Push notifications are not getting delivered to certain devices (iphone 4S/ios7.0.4 and ios7.0.3 - Push never worked for these two devices for this app). Received OK responses from Apple PUSH services, but notifications not delivered

We are testing an app at work and Push notifications are not getting delivered to certain devices (iphone 4S/ios7.0.4 and ios7.0.3 - Push never worked for these two devices for this app). Received OK responses from Apple PUSH services, but notifications not delivered to these tow devices.
PUSH notification were delivered to some of the other iOS devices: (iPhone5 / iOS 6.1.4 and iPhone5 / iOS 7.0.3)

Sounds like you have a battry issue but don't want to believe it.
If a car was running fine on one tank of gas, then you filled it up with another tank of gas and it began to run funny, one might suspect that tank of gas. But let's just say coincidence blew a valve-- would you think the new tank of gas was the culprit?
BUT WAIT!! It just might have been! The gas could have been of higher octane and put more more strain on the valves; you know, like going from 87 octane (OS6) to 93 octane (OS7) and showing you the engine was on the edge of compromise.
Sometimes you have to go with common sense. If everything else is ruled out, it must be the battery. And if it runs fine one moment in OS6 but immediately ***** in OS7, I'd believe my battery was suspect-- though comfy-- in OS6 but the OS7 showed its true power.
Moreover, if you had the answer-- or didn't want to believe someone's more competent advice-- why did you even call? You've already shown that you don't know much when you asked if you could go backwards after setting up the new OS as a new phone.
Additonally, if you're such the know-it-all, but yourself the $29 battery and put it in yourself. It's a piece of cake.
<Edited By Host>

Create ASN Shipping nonfiction without SUS in SRM

Dear expert,
We work SRM Server 5.5 Extended classic scenario.
We intend to work with POR Purchase order Response.
And we also want to use the ASN shipping notification
Can we use inbound ASN without SUS?
For example:
PO>POR>ASN in SRM server without sus.
Thanks
Isiaki

Hi,
I understand that ASN is document in ERP that called "Inbound delivery",
Can we get the ASN response from supplier in ERP? Can we see in the SRM system the ASN (created in the ERP) flow Local PO document that created in SRM?
Mining, we work extended classic scenario and we want to see the ASN details in the SRM LOCAL PO.
I also want that the confirmation that came after the ASN will create in the SRM. Is it possible?
Thanks
Isiaki

Issue with receiving response from web application

Hi,
I have configured B2B with business protocol as 'Custom document document over Internet', document exchange protocol as AS2-1.1 and transport protocol HTTPS1.1 to invoke a web application deployed in Oracle Application server. B2B is able to invoke the web application with HTTPS request which contains an xml.
I have set the acknowledgment mode as 'Sync' and 'Is acknowledgement handled by B2B' as true. But while receiving the response from web application which is an xml, B2B is showing the error as
Description: Unable to identify the document protocol of the message
StackTrace:
Error -: AIP-50083: Document protocol identification error
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.identifyDocument(Engine.java:3244)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1665)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request.postTransmit(Request.java:2382)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request.outgoingRequestPostColab(Request.java:1825)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request.outgoingRequest(Request.java:974)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:1166)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:833)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:400)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
I have added headers as present in the wire message of the request. In B2B, it is showing the wire message for response as follows.
TO_PARTY=XXX
AS2-To=XXX
DOCTYPE_NAME=TestAS2DT
DOCTYPE_REVISION=1.0
Date=Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:09:22 GMT
AS2-Version=1.1
AS2-From=YYY
Content-Transfer-Encoding=binary
[email protected]
ACTION_NAME=TestAS2_BA
Content-Type=application/xml
Server=Oracle-Application-Server-10g/10.1.3.4.0 Oracle-HTTP-Server
MIME-version=1.0
User-Agent=AS2 Server
FROM_PARTY=YYY
Content-Disposition=attachment; filename=1.0
Connection=Keep-Alive
From=YYY
Keep-Alive=timeout=15, max=100
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Books>
<Book>
<BookTitle>Ajax Hacks</BookTitle>
<Author>Bruce W. Perry</Author>
<PubDate>March 2006</PubDate>
</Book>
</Books>
I am able to see the xml sent as response from web application in Payload as follows.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Books>
<Book>
<BookTitle>Ajax Hacks</BookTitle>
<Author>Bruce W. Perry</Author>
<PubDate>March 2006</PubDate>
</Book>
</Books>
I am able to see the HTTP response in b2b_dc_transport.log. In transport log it is not showing any error. Please help me to fix this issue.

Hi,
Request and Response should be part of same agreement. I hope you are not confused between Acknowledgement and Response. Acknowledgement can be received in the same session (sync mode) but Response will always come in a different session and will be treated as a different document. If, for request, party A is initiator and B is responder then for response party B will be initiator and party A will be responder (as Requset and Response are two docs in case of Custom Document)
For configuring X-Path, please refer section 8.3.11 Configuring the XPath Expression for a Custom XML Document at below link -
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14099_19/integrate.1012/b19370/busact_coll.htm#sthref784
Please let us know whether you are trying to receive a response or Ack?
Regards,
Anuj

PO Confirmation from SUS is not going to R/3 throu Xi.

Hi Experts!
We are having an issue in SRM implemented with SUS for vendor administration, and Xi to comunicate both.
Basically this issue appears when we create a PO in R/3, then it goes to SUS to be handled by vendors, it means they confirm this PO, so when it was confirmed it backs to R/3. This step is not working, the confirmation in SUS is generated but it is not replicated in R/3. We think there is an issue between SUS and R/3 communication when vendor press confirm. This "between" is the Xi interface. Does anybody know some tips to check here? Does exist any RFC executed here? Can you give me some horizont on this? Thanks in advance!

warning messages should not be problem , they will not stop the xml message generation in the sus system..
get in to the details of the purchase order --> on the sus side UI --> and you can see place where there will be text
Requested Follow-On Documents .
what all do you see for the purchase order which you say is having problem..
and also check out the following -->
1) start transaction se37
2) type in BBP_PD_SUSPO_GETDETAIL
3) and execute the function module --> using F8
4) in the object id field > enter the sus purchase order number> and press F8
5) look for the table --> E_HEADER_REL
6) how many entries --> do you find there? --> look for second entry if there is --> specifially look for field --> OBJID_B.
7) that is the number of the purchase order response the sus system has send out...
let me know if the number is filled or not....

MM SUS on SRM one client

Dear Experts,
Need your help.
We are planning to implement MM SUS on SRM one client.
I have some questions/ doubts before starting the implementation could you please help me to answer them
Do we need PI to have a connection between SRM and MM
because its SRM one client SRM is add-on to ECC I mean on the same server?
b. Do we need to have separate client to implement SUS and
SRM as we generally do in case of separate SRM system ?
Thanks & Regards
Ankit Jain

Hi Ankit,
a, If you are going to use MM-SUS scenario, then XI is a must. Because you will need XI for message exchange for Supplier Self registration,PO Response, ASN, GR , Invoice creation
b, Yes, it is recommeded to implent SUS in a separate client than SRM.
Regards,
Ivy

SLOC not transferred to lines items from Default Settings (SRM 3.0)

When creating a shopping cart via bbpsc01, an SLOC is selected via F4 help (reads from R/3 backend). The SLOC is not populated down to the line items in the Shopping Cart.
This functioned prior to application of BBPCRM support stack 8.
Response from SAP is that we must maintain these SLOCs and their appropriate matching nomenclature in SRM under Extended Attributes via entry and then a report. Unfortunately, we have over 290K of them, and users can add on the fly in SAP backend, so this is not feasible.
Any help is appreciated and will be rewarded!
Bill

Thanks so much for your prompt post!
The report they provided was merely for updating the description, once you have maually added the SLOCs in ppoma_bbp via Extended Attributes> Storage Locations (report BBP_ATTR_TEXT_REFRESH).
What report would allow me to download locally all Storage Locations? If I schedule this to run from time to time, does it just pick up the new slocs?
I am fine with applying all SLOCs to my root structure, but do not know how to apply in ppoma_bbp other than manual entry.
Thanks again for the prompt response!

Replication of material from MM to SRM with only pricing info

Hi,
We want to replicate only those materials from MM to SRM for which prices are maintained in the MM system.Pls let me know how to get this done.
Thanks,
Manu

Hi,
Thanks for the response.
If I dont want to implement the BADI and transfer the prices from the backend system,In this case:
Suppose user create sc with $300(Price taken automatically from COMMPR01)
PO is created in r/3 with price as $250(Price taken from the Info records in MM)
Here the user budget will be updated as $300 instead of 250 and alo it might change the triggerring of workflows based on starting conditions.Is der a way by which we can replicate the prices maintained in info records in SRM or update the user budget with the prices maintained in Info records in MM.
Thanks,
Manu

Has anybody implemented SUS in SRM 5 - Extended classic - pls help

Hi There,
I would like to hear from anybody who has implemented SUS in SRM 5 - Extended Classic.
A client of mine is considering implementing SUS - SRM 5. I cannot find any SAP SUS related docuemntation for the Extended Classic scenario.
Do you have any helpful imformation i.e setup,config and tips that you can share with me.
Many thanks for your help in advance.
Thanks,
Sheena

Hi Sheena,
Please have a look at the link:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/srm/business+scenarios
Here you will find usefull information, like:
https://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700002897382004E/Plan-DrivenwithSInew.pdf
Regards,
Peter

Update PO data with those of POR by vendor from SUS

Ladies and gentlemen,
Le Radis will be delighted to give you 10 points or more if you explain how we can replace in a standard way or with a bespoke the Purchase Order data with those of the Purchase Order Response data created by the vendor in SUS.
We do not need any approval from the purchasing side.
We are running SRM4 with SUS 3 in a stand alone scenario.
Many thanks in advance.
Le Radis

Le Radis: you can use Workflow "Auto transfer of POR data to PO" (WS14500001). For more info, see the following help.sap document:
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm40/helpdata/en/45/87a34098022a54e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm">Workflows for Purchase Order Responses</a>
Adjust the start conditions if you want to deviate from the described standard start criteria (if you change the start conditions, make sure you adjust same for other POR workflows accordingly).
One pre-requisite of course is that PORs flow from SUS to EBP without any problems.
Cheers,
Serguei

Responses from Distributed Forms

Is there a way to send me an email notification once I receive a submitted response from a distributed form
using Acrobat?

Is the form being returned as a pdf or xml? You can distribute the form, which will set up a pdf portfolio for your returned forms. When forms are returned via email, you double click on the attachment and it puts into the portfolio. From the portfolio you can export one or more forms (data) into an excel file.
To export the whole form, click on File, Export and choose the file type you want. However, if you just want the form data, I would suggest you distribute the form to create the pdf portfolio for that.

How the **** can I stop stupid apple from sending me responses from a 3 years old post to my email ???

How the **** can I turn off email notifications to stop receiving responses from another post.
I alredy went to my profile and turned off every option I have for notifications. But this stupid company
Keeps send in me email notifications.
Warning !!! If you replay to this post you may end adding stuck with one more notification to your email,
Unable to opt out!

Hmm. It appears you are not subscribed to any threads. Let us know if the issue continues.

How do you get a RESPONSE from Verizon?

How does one get a response from Verizon? Here's my situation...
Given the amount of trouble that I have had with a recent order, you would think that I was trying to land a 747 jet on my roof. In reality, all I was aiming to do was to cancel the $19.99 per month phone service that I never used. I do not even own a phone, for that matter. I also had enhanced high speed Internet, and I wanted to retain the high speed Internet. A few days before January 13, 2012, I called Verizon and spoke to the 1st sales representative, who ensured me that it was no problem to cancel the phone service and yet retain the high speed Internet for the same monthly price. 24 hours later, my high speed DSL service was no longer functioning. I will try to briefly explain the disastrous customer service that ensued.
The first several phone calls to Verizon were not productive as I was transferred to the wrong department, and then at least one of my phone calls was dropped by the Verizon server. The representative did not call me back. I finally got in touch with a technical support representative, the 2nd Verizon representative, who informed me that the high speed Internet had been turned off and that I had to speak to a sales representative to solve the issue. Another sales representative, the 3rd Verizon representative, informed me that the 1st representative had cancelled my phone line, and thus cancelled all of my services. Great. The 3rd representative informed me that he was absolutely capable of handling the problem and that he would simply add a new order for high speed Internet, which was to be activated the next morning. The next morning came and went, and guess what? No Internet. I called again. The 4th Verizon representative told me that everything that had been done previously was incorrect and that the sales department is not capable of making such changes. She told me that she could not help me and that my claim had to be submitted to a different department, which has the authority to un-do all of the previous changes. She told me that I would receive a call back the same day to resolve the issue. Given my previous experiences with Verizon, I was confident that I would not, in fact, receive a call back and so I asked her how I could get transferred to this department, if I needed to call again. She said that I could not be transferred. Okay. So then I asked her what to ask for so that next time I called, I could be transferred to the correct department without dealing with yet another sales representative who gives me yet a different story. She informed me that she could not provide that information to customers. The Department That Shall Not Be Named (and that I cannot contact) did not call me, and I was not surprised. Unfortunately, I did not know how to go about contacting them, because, as I was told, customers aren’t allowed to do that.
The 6th phone call to Verizon was dropped by the Verizon server. The 7th phone call to Verizon went to the 5th Verizon representative, a sales associate who placed us on hold for the first 15 minutes only to inform us that she could not find any record of our Internet service. What the heck was she doing, checking her Facebook account? She finally returns, puts us on another extended hold, and then adamantly tells us that we need to speak with technical support, which, if you recall, was the first Verizon party that I spoke at the beginning of this debacle. The 5th representative transfers me again to technical support. Of course, the technical support personnel, the 6th Verizon representative said what the first one did, that the account was inactive and that we needed to talk to the sales department. My husband was on the phone at this point because I was DONE. When the 6th technical support representative tried to transfer him back to the sales department, my husband insisted that the 6th technical support representative remain on the line while we spoke to yet another sales representative, the 7th Verizon representative. The 6th technical support representative patiently waited with us while we sat in yet another long queue to speak with a member of the sales department.
The 7th sale representative, from the retention department based out of New Jersey, found that all previous orders had been set up erroneously. She cancelled the old orders and reinstated a completely new order. The DSL began working a few days later. MAGIC. She then left me a voicemail message saying that she would eliminate the activation and shipping fee (duh) as I never canceled the account to begin with and as I already had the equipment. She also applied a coupon to reduce the price to around $30 per month, assured for the next 2 years. I was relieved.
You can imagine our frustration then when we received the bill for $79 on February 6, 2012, which included a much higher monthly rate (around $45) and the shipping and activation fee of $19.99 that we were assured we would not pay. Again, nothing was shipped to us because we already had the equipment.
Our next phone call to Verizon landed us with a guy, the 8th Verizon representative, who had no intention of helping us. According to him, there was no record of these wrongs, and despite the fact that we had an old account number and three order numbers that were screwed up, he did not deem that there was enough evidence to change our monthly bill. (Unfortunately, the 7th Verizon representative did not make notes or appropriately document the situation on the new account.) The 8th Verizon representative then had the audacity to comment that we could be lying to him, yet he was unwilling to view the evidence that we could have presented. Instead, he suggested that we call tech support again and try to go through the same process to get connected to the mysterious “retention department” which he knew nothing about.
At this point, I was beyond fed up. The attitude of the 8th Verizon representative put me over the edge. I filed a complaint with the Better Business Bureau (BBB) with an abbreviated version of this story. I did not file the complaint to get back at Verizon. Instead, I filed the complaint because I knew that another phone call to Verizon would be useless. I’ve been dealing with this issue for over a month, and I’m sick of it. I have better things to do with my time, believe it or not, and this situation has resulted in a significantly waste of my time over what, in my opinion, was a very simple issue to resolve.
The BBB processed the complaint and I was contacted last Friday afternoon by a Verizon representative (the 9th) who said that she was looking into the matter and that she would respond to me within two to three business days. Well, it’s almost the end of the week, and I have received no response. Again, after all of this, how could I be surprised?
I have been a Verizon customer, wireless and residential, for as long as I can remember, but I am reaching the point of outrage. This situation is truly unacceptable.
You would think that, in 2012, with all of the technology available to us and the fact that Verizon is a COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, that at least Verizon employees would be able to make a basic change to an existing order and that at least one out of 9 Verizon representatives would be able to solve this issue in a span of over four weeks. Think again.
How does one get a response from Verizon?

dougiedc wrote:
It boggles the mind. The Verizon store on L Street downtown Washington, D.C. cannot access my Verizon account. They can only sell cellphones then it's up to me to contact Verizon on my own to get the hook up. I even asked "Are you Verizon employes? Is this a vendor store or is it really a Verizon owned and operated store?" The answer "Yes, we are Verizon employes, yes this is a Verizon owned and operated store" ...
Yes, it indeed boggles the mind. I'm of course referring to the fact that your post concerns Verizon Wireless products and services. This forum is dedicated exclusively to Verizon Communications services. As you probably know, Verizon Wireless and Verizon Communications operate as separate companies.
If you need help for a Verizon wireless product or service, it's best to direct questions to the Verizon Wireless forums. You can reach them by clicking on "Wireless" (either here or at the top of the page).
Good luck and I sincerely hope you get your issue resolved.

PO Response from SUS in SRM Notification.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for