Poor result using Compressor

I need help. I use a Sony camera (HDR CX560) bought in US with NTSC as standard. I live in Europe and would like to burn a DVD for my Blue-Ray player showing it on my PAL TV.
The footage is 1080i, 1920x1080, 29,97 fps.
I have tried several different ways of achieving good results, but with no luck:
1. Editing in Final Cut Pro with original specs (1080i, 29,97). The result showing in FCP viewer is not perfect, but quite good. A little bit of stuttering and a bit blury pictures. I have tried "Send to Compressor...", selected MPEG-2 for DVD in Compressor (customized to 16:9 TV format). The process stops after a minute - a file is being created, but only the first 30 seconds of the movie is visible. I also tried Share>Export file using Compressor settings. The file created does not have acceptable quality, mostly bescause of very disturbing stripes. I also tried Share>Master file but the output is not good enough (using codec Apple ProRes422 (HQ) - same stripes.
2. Editing in Final Cut Pro with european standard (1080i, 25i). The result in FCP viewer is good with one exception - a lot of stuttering images while panning. I tried all the output/share alternatives mentioned above, with poor result.
I use OS X 10.8.3, Final Cut Pro X 10.0.8 and Compressor 4.0.7
Can anyone help?

pnils wrote:
. Created a project with the original settings (1080i, 1920x1080, 29,97 fps).
FCP is usually pretty bullet proof in handling formats – and most of the time letting it set the project properties is the best way.
From what you've said about the camera and the footage, you shouldn't encounter any potential problems until after you export and start the standards conversion.
Create another project. When the new project dialogue window appears, make sure the settings are set to automatic (video properties set by first clip). Take one of the 1080i 60 clips and edit it to the timeline to set those properties. Export that clip as a test. If it plays smoothly, and it should, proceed to delete the clip from the project and paste the problem sequence to the new project. Delete all project render files and event render files. Now export (don't bother to re-render).
Post back with results.
Russ

Similar Messages

  • H.264 Droplet producing poor results in Compressor 4

    I was happy to see my compressor droplet library updated with the new version icon but when I ran some tests the exact same settings (via droplet) produced noticeably different results. Compressor 4 is consistently distorting moving high contrast edges. Am I the only one seeing this? Any remedies besides avoiding Compressor 4 all together?
    Compressor 4
    Compressor 3

    It appears restarting my machines after the App Store install cleared up the issue. 

  • Poor Result using Panasonic Frame Rate Converter.  Please Help!

    Hey All,
    Myself and a crew of other university filmmakers shot some footage at 720P and 60 FPS on the Panasonic HVX-100 with the hopes of converting it to 24fps for smooth slow motion. We are using FCP 5.1.2 and the panasonic DVCPROHD Frame Rate Converter Tool. I am almost certain I am using the correct workflow for this, but the result yields footage that seems to be at the right speed, but is very jumpy, as if its only playing every 4th frame or so. I tried exporting the footage off the timeline as well to check and make sure it wasnt a playback problem, and it wasnt. It appears as if the converter is working incorrectly. This slow motion is vital for our project and I'm at my wits end trying to figure it out. Any help?

    Ok. I tried converting making sure that i didnt remove any frames on the import from the raw P2, as well as for the export. i tried all the combos of this. I still get the jumpy slow motion because of repeatyed frames. I did notice a combo in these repeated frames, it will play 3 of one frame, then 2 of another. could this be a pulldown problem somewhere?
    could you guys outline the settings you use to import (capture and editing timebases) as well as to edit on, and to process slow motin. I just want to make sure im not missing anything.
    The help is SO awesome. thanks for trying to work through this with me.

  • Export using Compressor crashes Motion

    Motion 2.1.2
    This problem seems to have surfaced out of nowhere. When using the commandshifte command to export from Motion using Compressor, Motion crashes. Every time. Was fine yesterday and have not done any software updates since. Can export directly out of Motion (but need to do a batch). Trashed Motion and Compressor prefs and repaired permissions. Compressor fires up on its own just fine.
    Help?

    Export to Compressor using any ProRes format does not work.
    If anyone would like me to upload the project I can, but it'll be a big one if I "collect media."
    Bottom line, this workflow works in Compressor 3.0, 3.0.1,2 but not 3.0.3. It gets a strange pixelation that is unusable.
    I cannot describe my dissatisfaction with Apple right now. My business runs on FCS2 and I have had to start this project (which is on a strict timeline.. aren't they all?) from scratch because there is no way out of this bug. The forward compatibility is another issue altogether, which irritates me beyond description.
    I have noticed on these boards, that I often do some unique work and no-one experiences the "exact" same problems I encounter. I do tend to push the limits of what FCS can do, but I am not extraordinary by any means. I simply use it the way it's intended.
    Exporting from Motion, using compressor, is the best way to format my graphics for my FCP timeline as I have to export many graphic sequences that need to match my FCP sequence settings. There is no reason the "export to compressor" using a custom compression ProRes preset should result in mangled motion graphics.
    TO APPLE: Come the **** on. This is YOUR compression algorithm.
    Please if anyone has anything to add here I'm welcome to suggestions.
    Currently the only thing I can do to alleviate the problem is to roll-back to FCS/Compressor from disc and re edit my entire sequence.
    **** poor. **** poor.

  • Why won't 110 min video not fit DVD when using Compressor Best 120 min

    I have a standard DV video lasting 110 minutes. I have exported it as a DV clip and imported that clip as an asset in DVD Studio Pro 4. Build fails with a not enough room on the output media message. I have also exported from FCP using Compressor set to the Best 120 minute setting with the same result. Shouldn't 110 minutes fit on a standard DVD using either of these methods?
    What's up? What can I do to get this material on a standard DVD?

    If you are using a 4.7gb DVD and the video is 110min then use the 120min preset then click on the icon that shows you the "estimate size". In my opinion it is very accurate, but it doesn't include the audio in that calculation. So just bring down the Mbps (the top slider) down about .5 of a bit rate and then your audio should fit just fine and you can use the 120 min setting.
    You do this, you click your "video" or MPEG icon in the "untitled" tab. Now look in the "Inspector" to the right. See the "estimated size"? Now click on the "encoder" icon (second to the left), Click "Quality" tab, and adjust the "Mbps" down about .5ish.
    "Liiiiiiiiiiiiike a glove!"

  • Poor results importing PSE7 slideshows into PRE7

    I originally posted this query into the Photoshop Elements forum ('cos I couldn't find this one originally...) and received some very helpful replies from Barb__O - thanks Barb.  These have given me some useful leads on things to try, which I've done and did see some improvements, but I'm still not at the point of being happy with the results.  The problem appears to be a PRE problem, so reposting here...
    I am trying to put together a video presentation for output directly to PC monitor (more specifically, LCD data projector of 1024 x 768 resolution) and then record to DVD, in PAL SD format.
    The presentation is to contain slideshows put together in PSE7 (so they already include title slides, transitions, Ken Burns effects and music tracks) and video clips from a couple of different sources - one clip is a scanned Standard 8 film (format is a frame-to-frame AVI at 720 x 576 resolution ie SD PAL) and some clips from a 1440 x 1080 HD (H.264) video camera (Canon HF10).  Reading through some of the forums, I'm doubting that PRE7 will be able to handle this variety of input formats...
    The still images come from many sources - digital camera, scanned prints (B&W and colour) and scanned transparencies.  All images were dropped into the PSE7 slideshow in their respective original sizes/resolutions.  There are close to 100 images in the slideshow.  Apart from a few scanned B&W print enlargements that were spat out by PSE7 because they were too large (other photo editors had no problem with them - seems PSE is a little precious in this regard...) the process of putting the slide show together went pretty smoothly.
    Playing the finished slideshow in the PSE7 preview window, the results were excellent.  Exporting the slideshow as a 1024 x 768 WMV file and playing it in any media player yielded the same, excellent results!  So far, so good.
    I then wanted to put everything together using PRE7 - slideshows, video clips and titles.  From PSE7 I clicked the "send slideshow to Premiere Elements" at which point the slideshow was dutifully dropped into my currently opened PRE7 project.  As the project already contained the aforementioned scanned Standard 8 clip, the project setting was PAL DV 48kHz.  I was feeling exuberant at this stage.  I added a couple of title slides and a transition or two and played the result in the PRE7 full screen preview window...
    I was absolutely horrified with what I saw when the slideshow started to play.  All of the still images were badly pixellated, had jagged edges and any vertical wipe transitions had a horrible, angular ripple effect.  In short, unwatchable.
    As I had to get the presentation done and was clearly getting nowhere with PRE7, I exported all my slideshows out of PSE7 as WMVs, my video clip out of PRE7 as an AVI and dropped everything into Windows Movie Maker, with excellent results on the PC monitor and the LCD projector.  Clearly there was/is a problem with PRE7 or one or more of its esoteric settings.
    I now want to add another slideshow and the HD video clips mentioned above to the presentation and then burn to DVD.  I would like to use PRE7 to do this, as I can set up menu markers where I want and I want to make finer adjustments to relative positions of stills and video than Movie Maker will allow - but obviously this is all dependent on resolving the quality problems.
    After suggestions given by Barb, I played around with the PRE7 project setting and tried various settings here, eg HDV, SVHCD etc.  These certainly improved the quality of the still images in the slideshows (to the point where I was happy with them), but the transitions were still ugly and the pan/zoom effects became jerky and distracting, not only that, but the music track that I had synchronised with the slideshow, with a nice fade out at the end, just ended abruptly - again distracting and not at all good.
    To be honest I'm confused with that project setting - should this be set to the format I want the finished project output to end up in, or is it set to the format of video input to the project?  If the latter, how does it deal with different format video clips?
    I've also read about the recommendation to set all still images to 1000 x 750 pixels - this would have been fine if I'd known this *before* I put together the slideshows, I don't want to have to re-do them all again (or can I re-size the images while they are actually *in* the slideshow?)!  Besides, PSE7 itself and Windows Movie Maker handle images larger than this, quite happily.  Why can't PRE7?  Also, how is this resolved for large portrait orientated images?  What is the primary dimension (width or height)?
    As an aside, I tried re-sizing a single image to 1000 x 750 and dropping straight into PRE7, but I still get poor results (ie grainy, pixellated image)!  ("Scale to framesize" is off)
    So am I flogging a dead horse here or can I resurrect things so that I can end up with a reasonably professional looking result?  I really want to love these two products, they do some things really well, but so far, my overall user experience has been one of complete frustration and disappointment.  The user interfaces of these two products have to be about the worst I've come across!
    Thanks.

    Steve,
    FYI - I think that MK had already tried sending directly from PSE 7 to PRE 7 see his mention of
    I then wanted to put everything together using PRE7 - slideshows, video
    clips and titles.  From PSE7 I clicked the "send slideshow to Premiere
    Elements" at which point the slideshow was dutifully dropped into my
    currently opened PRE7 project.  As the project already contained the
    aforementioned scanned Standard 8 clip, the project setting was PAL DV
    48kHz.
    One of my concerns about the specifc scenario is that the PE project setting was PAL SD video and the expected projector resolution was thought to be 1024x768 (and therefore higher resolution). even with Scale to Framesize off, I was not sure if that resolution difference would be a problem.
    Your suggestion is making the PAL SD DVD and then using a software DVD player to play that DVD to the 1024x768 projector.   That is a different approach that I had not considered -- but it would probably avoid some of the awkwardness of dealing with 2 distinct types and resolutions of output.
    MK,
    Your earlier post (if I understood it correctly) said that after the presentation using the projector, you would be making DVDs for distribution. Now I suspect that these would be standard definiton DVDs and probably PAL.
    I recommend that you confirm in this thread what your current plans are for distributiion and playback.
    Once the best fit for a PE project type is resolved, I do think it is worth another try of sending the slideshow from PSE 7 slide show editor to the PE 7 project.
    Yes, you may expereince some timing differences between the playback you saw in the PSE slide show editor and what you see in the playback under Premiere Elements (note Steve's point to be sure that you should render in PE before doing playback).   Based on what you observe for your specific slide show, these differences can be discussed.
    ADDITIONAL comments
    played the result in the PRE7 full screen preview window...
    I missed this earlier.  Because your computer monitor is probably much higher resolution, I question whether this full screen preview is an effective evaluation of the final quality. Steve and Hunt, what are your comments on this?
    MK
    can I re-size the images while they are actually *in* the slideshow?)!
    Besides, PSE7 itself and Windows Movie Maker handle images larger than
    this, quite happily.
    re-size images while they are actually in the slide show -- maybe but not easy
    1 --When in the PSE slide show or from the PE Timeline, you can edit an individual photo and replace the existing photo with the results of that edit. However that is a one at a time operation and most probably not what you want.  It is better suited to adjustments to a specific photo when you determine it needs to be differrent for this slide show.
    2 --Once your slide show is on the Premiere Elements Timeline, a few people have swapped out a folder of photos and brought in a different folder of downsized same photos. This is tricky but probably can be done: it is probably simpler if all photos are in the same folder. Also portrait photos probably need to be handled separately from landscape photos.
    FYI - PSE 7 slide show can sometimes handle larger images and you did not have a problem - but others do have problems and you might in the future. This seems to depend on both the specifics of the photo files and the computer system configuration.

  • FCP Export using Compressor hangs 'em both

    I searched for the answer earlier this week. Didn't find anything, but I eventually figured it out. Here was my problem:
    The Compressor preferences allow you to choose a default preset. I never had defined a default preset, and things worked fine. When I do choose a default preset (I chose DVD Best Quality: 120min: All), there were problems. Selecting sequences in FCP and doing "Export using Compressor" results in a hang on both apps.
    The number of sequences or their lengths seem to have no effect on the process. Just thought I'd post this in case anyone else has the same problem.
    Alan

    This sounds different from my problem. I was getting a hang when the sequences were being added to the batch list. It wouldn't even give me a chance to submit the batch. Maybe someone else has a clearer idea of what you're experiencing.

  • Quality of DVD Studio Pro using Compressor vs iDVD

    Sorry to repeat the question below, which I have also posted under DVD SP...I thought that perhaps someone watching Compressor would also have input.
    I have been trying to obtain a DVD output with DVD Studio Pro where moderate speed pans don't jerk. Oddly, I get better results using iDVD. The image in iDVD isn't as sharp, but the quality of movement (pans, tilts) is smoother. My program length is only 20 minutes and I have used compressor to encode outside of DVD SP. The compressor setting was for DVD, 60 mins, best quality. Why is it that a consumer software such as iDVD yields better results in this aspect? What am I doing wrong in DVD SP that results in less than professional results. All input appreciated. Thanks in advance

    Pamela
    hy is it that a consumer software such as iDVD yields better results in this aspect? What am I doing wrong in DVD SP that results in less than professional results.
    You are messing around with Compressor settings . . . I guess!
    Hope that helps !
      Alberto

  • Getting poor results with Refine Edge tool

    Not sure if anyone else has run into this issue. But after following numerous tutorials on lynda.com as well as tv.adobe.com and youtube, I just can't get good selection results using the Refine Edge tool in Photoshop CC and I'm convinced it's something I'm doing wrong, but I have no idea what.
    After downloading this Wikipedia image of Bismarck for a history documentary, I tried isolating the figure from the background using Refine Edge and keep getting poor results. Maybe it's my settings, I'm just not sure. But after painting over my edges, I end up with terrible results. Unfortunately, I'm getting poor results with other images as well. Can anyone venture to guess what I might be doing wrong? Thanks very much in advance.

    Hi ninose11,
    For this type of project and idea, I would recommend trying some of the magnetic lasso tool. The tool is located as the third tool in the toolbar (you should see a lasso or rope looking icon), hold down the icon and it should expand - then select the magnetic lasso tool. The magnetic lasso tool will allow you to scroll over the edge of his profile and it will automatically detect the outline edges. The slower you roll-over the shape the higher the accuracy will be. If the magnet is not detecting a particular edge or sharp corner (for example, the ear) you can manually drop points by simply right-clicking at any point during the selection. If the edge is too sharp, you can also create a light feather which will blend the edge softly (this should be located at the top).
    If this is unsuccessful still, you can try selecting by color, using the Magnetic Wand Tool (forth icon in the toolbar, again hold down for all options). Once you are using the magnetic wand tool, you should be able to select all the black areas of the background to delete. You can increase or decrease the tolerance to change the sensitivity of the selection.
    Hope this helps!

  • Error message using compressor

    When I hit the "submit" button after adding settings to a video I want to export, the message, "Unable to submit to queue. Please restart your computer or verify your Compressor installation is correct."
    Why would I get this message. Is there a simple way to fix it so I can use Compressor?

    Hi Thot, just trawling these forums looking for some info.. I noticed this.... yeah the QT error -50 comes up.. cant find a specific reason. I had this has with a job I submitted via FCPX ti Compressor.app via "send to compressor". I recall a thread somewhere in these forums that this error was a result of genuine Quicktime error whilst performing work on one or more effects in FCPX.
    So I simply went in and redid the effects in FCPs. It was something simple like a cross dissolves.
    In any case if you are gettingt this error from a comperssor submittion of SHARE from FCPX and you see it in compressor., it might be worth do a trial and error on your FCPX storyline.
    Simply make a few test projects and try to narrow down withe effect is causing this issue.
    worth a look
    w
    Hong Kong

  • Using compressor to create a 180 minute DVD from VHS

    Hi,
    Converted some files across to my hard drive using Elgato Video Capture.
    I asked for the file in H.264 not MP4 (although end file is .mp4?).
    Was using toast to convert the file to MPEG-2 for DVD use, but wasn't greatly impressed with the results.
    So I am using compressor instead. A couple of questions though.
    1. Compressor only has a setting up to 150 minutes. Do I use this?
    2. How does Compressor understand the estimated minutes in the encoder section? i.e. when you change the bit-rate, the estimate at the bottom of the screen changes. I am a little confused as I know a dual layer disk will allow up to 8.5GB. But at 2.7 Mbps it comes in at 147 minutes, but only 4.27 GB. Surely this means I can up the bit-rate significantly getting better quality as I am going to burn to dual layer?
    3. What does it mean when it says 'allows 145 minutes/layers of video on "DVD-S" - I'm burning to a DVD+R...
    4. They are all shot 4:3 and Elgato has transferred the file to a 640x480 aspect ratio. But compressors standard setting is 720x576 - do I need to change this to match the file? i.e. 640x480?
    Thanks

    Elgato should be able to capture full res SD 720x576. If not you should consider another converter or capturing with iDVD.
    All PAL DVD footage must be converted to 720x576 MPG-2 in order for DSP/iDVD to make a DVD.
    The reason there is no 3 hour setting in Compressor is because the software isn't able to make decent looking compression with that amount of footage. This is also why studios never put 3 hours of features and extras on a standard DVD-5 - they always make a DL disc.
    Some DVD-R recorders will do an OK job of this and Toast has a feature that will recompress your dual-layer DVD(more than 4.3GB) to fit on a DVD-5 but there are many variables to this equation and no real hard and fast answers.

  • Poor Results from Time Stretch

    Hi all,
    So on a number of occasions, I have tried using the Time Stretch feature in Soundtrack Pro, but nearly every time I use it, I get noticeably poor results. For example, if I take a 31-second soundtrack and squeeze it to 30 seconds, the playback sounds very choppy. The same happens vice versa when I stretch audio by small amounts. I find myself having to do this function in Adobe Soundbooth instead. I really like Soundtrack Pro, but it seems that this feature is inferior. The funny thing is, I've seen tutorials online about this feature, but I've never seen the people giving the tutorials have any issues. Does anyone encounter this same issue? And, does anyone know if there's a fix for this situation?
    By the way, I'm using Soundtrack Pro 3.0.1, and I'm running it on a Mac-Pro 12-core with Mac OS X 10.6.6.

    I've done this all the time and always had good results... And I've been able to stretch quite a bit... My audio has always been 48K, 16 bit.

  • Poor quality after compressor

    I shot footage using the Panasonic AG-HMC150 (AVCHD)
    I transfered them into FCP using Apple ProRes 422
    My first attempt was exporting using compressor (large quicktime file, roughly 160 GB of quicktime footage) and after selecting the DVD:Best Quality 150 minutes (for 130 min project) the video quality was very poor.
    I have tried troubleshooting with smaller files, but can't find any solutions.

    Well regular DVDs are going to be SD MPEG2 no matter what the source-- they're all the same codec. That said, not all MPEG2 encoders are created equal: Hollywood pictures are often done with this:
    http://www.omni-cinemacraft.com/productscinemacraftencodermp.shtml
    But short of buying that, this is a good place to start:
    http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/bitbudget.html

  • Quality differences between "Export Using Compressor..." and Drag & Drop

    There are quite a few people out there discussing the 24p workflow for the new Canon HV20 (on hv20.com, dvinfo.net, etc.). The HV20 can shoot 24 progressive frames/sec, but stores them as 29.97 interlaced HDV on tape, with an arbitrary cadence.
    One of the better workflows is to capture into FCP using HDV over Firewire, and use Compressor to extract the progressive frames from the interlaced. Its Reverse Telecine seems to automatically figure out the cadence. I've been testing this using the "Other Workflows > Apple Codecs > Apple ProRes 422 for Progressive material (HQ)" preset, with the following modifications, Frame Controls: On, Deinterlace: Reverse Telecine, Frame Size: 1920x1080.
    That's just background.
    The problem is this. If I export the HDV clip from FCP, "Export > Using Compressor...", the resulting 24p footage is extremely high quality. However, if I drag & drop the HDV clip directly into Compressor, or set up a Compressor droplet (arguably more straightforward for batch conversions), the resulting footage has obvious resizing artifacts (jaggies).
    Obviously, I'm keeping everything consistent setting-wise, and have thoroughly examined the resulting .movs. The only difference is the actual image quality.
    Anyone seen anything like this?
    I'm less concerned about this specific workflow than I am about Compressor producing non-identical results from identical footage with the same settings, dependent on your chosen workflow...
      Mac OS X (10.4.10)  

    What I need to know if it is a dramatic different in quality that I should use DVD Pro instead of iDVD.
    If you want a DRAMATIC improvement in quality, shoot sharp, high quality content like Hollywood (usually on film) and have it compressed by high quality hardware encoders.
    There is a good reason Hollywood DVDs look better than iDVD/DVD Studio Pro DVDs.
    F Shippey

  • Do you have to use Compressor with DVD Studio Pro?

    Hello,
    I'm trying to find a way to streamline bringing QuickTime Movies made in FCP6 into DVDSP.
    When I try to import QT Movies or movies compressed with H.264 into DVD Studio Pro, I get the error message: "Incompatible Format".
    Is there anyway to get QT Movies into DVDSP successfully without using Compressor?
    The least applications I have my students using for this, the better.
    It's odd to me because you can go directly from QT Movie into iDVD with no such problems.
    Thanks,
    Marc Griffin
    Message was edited by: Marc Griffin

    Hi Steve,
    Thanks for the quick response. The rationale of our workflow is to avoid using Compressor to simplify the process for our students making DVDs. But if we are going to have to use Compressor to change the frame rate, as you suggested, then we're just going to have to live with using the application.
    We'd consider burning High Def DVDs, but with the format war between BluRay and HDDVD, and a general lack of High Def players and Monitors on the general marketplace, we are going to have to stick with SD DVDs for the time being.
    Resultantly, we're going to be stuck with using Compressor in our DVD burning workflow.
    Thanks Everyone For Your Help!
    Marc Griffin

Maybe you are looking for

  • Reminders keeps asking for access to location. Where are prefs stored?

    Several times a day, on my MacBook Pro, I get a message that Reminders wants access to my location. I always click Yes (or Allow), but it keeps asking me, over and over again. And for the record, the computer never leaves my bedroom. I figured its pr

  • Connecting samsung blue ray to OLD wireless D-Link Router

    i recently purchased a samsung blue ray player with wireless capabilities.  when trying to connect to my D-link router used in my house it does not recognize the router (iphones and ipads used in the house pick up this network).  when i tried to manu

  • Partner function AP is not defined in partner procedure N ()

    Hi, Error: Partner function AP is not defined in partner procedure N (). I am getting above error in CRM service orders for Contact person replication from CRM  ECC. In debugging Middleware queue and we found that it is getting triggered from FM SD_

  • Script to show JPEG degradation

    Hello All, I'm trying to demonstrate the degradation of jpeg's over multiple recompressions. My planned approach is; Open image; Save image as new file at compression rate x; Open the newly compressed file; Loop; I would like to run the script so I g

  • Provisioning EP roles and user groups through CUP

    Hello experts, I am configuring EP provisioning through CUP. I created the EP connector as per the instructions in the config guide. But I have not added any parameter values or did any field mapping. I have imported necessary Portal roles. My EP con