POSDM : Post surcharge

Hi ,
I have a requirement to post surcharge into POSDM.
For example -    Price        - 100
                         Surcharge - 10
                         Total sales price - 110.
I am using WPUBON idoc .My question is , which segment will i be mapping "surcharge" in BAPI structure?
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Vijay

Following is accounting entry during Billing Document release to accounting:
|Customer Acc. |Dr| |1060| |
|Sales Revenue Acc. | |Cr| |1000|
|Tax Account| |Cr.| |60|
This is if you have Price inclusive of taxes. And you collect taxes from customer with the base price of the material.
Do want account entries like this?
Option1
|Customer Acc. |Dr| |1000| |
|Sales Revenue Acc. | |Cr| |940|
|Tax Account| |Cr.| |60|
OR
Option2
|Customer Acc. |Dr| |1000| |
|Sales Revenue Acc. | |Cr| |1000|
In either of the case, check your pricing procedure & respective account entries.
Else, if you looking for accural entries of taxes then the accounting entries will be
|Customer Acc. |Dr| |1060| |
|Sales Revenue Acc. | |Cr| |1000|
|Defer Tax Account| |Cr.| |60|
AND
Check GL Account 7000014141 in FBL3N.
|Defer Tax Account |Dr| |60| |
|Tax Account| |Cr.| |60|
Incase of nay further concern or doubt, do revert back to us.
Regards
JP

Similar Messages

Surcharge to be post using two deferent GL accounts

Hi Guys,
I have customer requirement to post a surcharge using of two G/L accounts for each line item,
Say Exu2026
Surcharge item condition ZTM1 have value Rs 1000/- need to post two G/L account same amount with out change 1) 2000014141 2) 7000014141,
I have updated the both GL accounts in VKOA in GL account/Provision account, created condition type assigned to pricing procedure , done other settings , created invoice , in the condition if I double click I can see both GL accounts in the invoice but the condition value is posted to first GL account not posted to second GL account.
Is there any routine or SAP notes for this issue to fix?

Following is accounting entry during Billing Document release to accounting:
|Customer Acc. |Dr| |1060| |
|Sales Revenue Acc. | |Cr| |1000|
|Tax Account| |Cr.| |60|
This is if you have Price inclusive of taxes. And you collect taxes from customer with the base price of the material.
Do want account entries like this?
Option1
|Customer Acc. |Dr| |1000| |
|Sales Revenue Acc. | |Cr| |940|
|Tax Account| |Cr.| |60|
OR
Option2
|Customer Acc. |Dr| |1000| |
|Sales Revenue Acc. | |Cr| |1000|
In either of the case, check your pricing procedure & respective account entries.
Else, if you looking for accural entries of taxes then the accounting entries will be
|Customer Acc. |Dr| |1060| |
|Sales Revenue Acc. | |Cr| |1000|
|Defer Tax Account| |Cr.| |60|
AND
Check GL Account 7000014141 in FBL3N.
|Defer Tax Account |Dr| |60| |
|Tax Account| |Cr.| |60|
Incase of nay further concern or doubt, do revert back to us.
Regards
JP

Post of Late payment surcharge amount.

Hi Experts,
In my project, i am calculating the late payment surcharge amount ( LPSC Amount) through custom programme aganist the contract acccount and storing it in a custom table.
Custom program calculates LPSC amount in the day in which incoming payment is received against any charge (including invoice). LPSC is calculated in a time dependant slabs, depending on clearing date > net due date.
Can anyone help me how to post the calculated amount to the contract account.
Regards,
Paul

Hi,
You can use BAPI_CTRACDOCUMENT_CREATE to post a Fi-CA document.
Thanks,
Amlan

IS-Retail POSDM- double posting of material documents and billing document

Hello All,
I had initially posted this question in "Industries Solution General" forum. Reposting it in the appropriate forum-
We have a nightly job for program "RWPOS_PARA_ENQUEUE" which processes all WPUBON idocs (sales info) that comes in from POSDM. Sometimes we have noticed that for one idoc 2 material documents and 2 billing documents are being created with the same information.
Note that this happens sporadically and we have no idea why or when it can happen. Also, we have duplicate checks in POSDM and this happens only when the idoc flows into ECC from POSDM i.e. one sales idoc posts 2 sets of documents for no apparent reason. Is there any way to prevent this? Why is this happening? Your inputs will be really appreciated.
Thanks,
Smitha

hi,
Just go to FB03 click enter and then
Company code
Fiscal Year
Ledger
Document type against customer invoice DR and then if u hav an idea abt the customer invoice doc then give doc number ....other excute and search for the customer no....
And then double click on the document
then goto ENVIRONMENT -
> Document over view -
> relation ship brower click
then you can see all the relating document to that account i.e account doc,profitcenter doc ,material ,oytbond delivery doc ,billing doc etc...
if useful assign points.....
regards,
santosh kumar

Surcharge not posted in remittance challan update

Hi
Remittance challan is posted. But in that surcharge only is not posted.
How to do that?

Hi
Please help on this issue as earliest as possible. Its urgent.
System is picking surcharge also with TDS, Ed.Cess and SHEC but after poting challan, only surcharge is not posted.
Thanks in advance
Dhanashree

How to extract the Incometax,Ed.cess,Surcharge,Total tax after post to acco

DeaR Experts,
Im into HR Module.
At present we are going to develop a customized report on TDS for a particular month.According to our requirements we have to extract the details from only the posting documents,which were already posted to accounts.
For this we need to extract the amounts of /460(Total Tax),/4MT(Basic Tax),/4ME,/4MH(EDucational cess) wagetypes.
How and where we have to extract/fetch the amounts to have these values in the customized report.
Please advice any Transaction code availble for to view the details of all abovve wagetypes.Through PCP0 we can view only the /460 only.Kindly guide me to move furthur.
Please advice.
Regards,
Vi Sai

Hi,
There are various possible ways to have the said details.
You may develop customized employee TDS register with the help of Abaper.
Moreover, PCPO is posting document only.
Use pc_payresult t-code which have all break ups which you requires, from where Abaper will develop the report.
Secondly You can also use PC00_M40_F24 which is a standard form program where you will get employee wise TDS break up details for TDS return filing.
Hope this will help.
R/s
Valay Pandya

Store Order Surcharges and Discount to Post to Warehouse Cost Center?

Dear All
In an order from store to warehouse, our setting is such that if there is a logistic charge, it will post to the store's profit center as per below as the Store is the receiving site in the document.
From
PK GL Desc Profit Center Amount
99 1000 Warehouse Stock A001 292.77-
89 1001 Store Stock A120 303.75
50 9600 Logistic Charge A120 10.98-
Is it possible to configure the system such that the logistic charge post to the warehouse profit center A001 instead?
Change to:
PK GL Desc Profit Center Amount
99 1000 Warehouse Stock A001 292.77-
89 1001 Store Stock A120 303.75
50 9600 Logistic Charge A001 10.98-

Hi,
Basically 101 Movement type would mean that the Goods are being received into the enterprise (could be a Warehouse,Cost Center or a Logical Storage location).
Migo is a transaction which enables to document the Goods Receipt and henec this needs a reference document which could be a PO ,Production Order etc,.
In the normal Goods Receipt into a Warehouse against a PO the Goods are valuated(Inventorised in Physical & Financial Terms).
In the case of the goods received against a PO for cost center the value is directly posted into the Consumption account instead of the Stock account in case of the former
I hope the above is sufficient.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

POS-DM, BIW & R/3 posting issue after BIW patch updation

Landscape details:
SAP IS-Retail (ECC 6.0), SAP POS (Triversity GM 9.5.10), PI 7.0, BIW/POS-DM 7.0
Issue Detail
We have upgraded the patch level of Support package BI_CONT in BIW from 5 to 11 in production server and after that following issues have started:
1.     The duplicate posting started in R/3 i.e. if some POS EoD (TLog) file is already posted from POS-DM to R/3 and if the same file comes to POS-DM again then it gets posted in R/3 again. It was not happening before updating the patch, it used to get stop in POS-DM only.
2.     We have some EANs which starts with ZERO, those POS transaction doesnu2019t get posted in BIW Cubes and R/3 wherein the ZERO prefix articles exists. It stuck in POS-DM with the error u201CUnknown EAN/UPC numberu201D. But this error comes only if we enable the u201CMstr Data Filteru201D check from General Setting in /N/POSDW/IMG. If we disable this check then the data gets posted in R/3 but it doesnu2019t go in RSA7 & BIW Cubes.
3.     Before updating the patch the u201CMstr Data Filteru201D check was disabled and our posting was happening perfectly in R/3 as well BIW. What we understand is that, this check is required to pick the Article Code from masters with reference of EAN number which comes in POS TLog file and then it gets posted. We had written a ROUTINE in update rules to pick the Article Code from masters after truncating ZERO prefix from EAN, because the masters which we upload in R/3 with ZERO prefix EAN are getting updated in BIW without ZERO prefix.
4.    In the T-Code /N/POSDW/MON0, we are not able to change the status of processed transaction from 4 (completed) to 1 (ready) or vice-a-versa. Earlier we were able to do the same. This is required to re-process the transactions after doing the corrections in errors occurred at the time of first processing.
Regards
Amar Preet Singh

Hi
1)Duplicate posting in R/3 : check the 'Tasks' configuration WPUUMS & WPUTAB in /N/POSDW/IMG in POSDM.
2) Write a Routine in BI side to allow EAN's with prefix Zeros
3) master data filter is used to check the data with BI master data. Master data filter should always be used while data posting.
4) The status should be first changed from completed to cancelled/rejected and then cancelled to Ready status.
    Then you will be able to reprocess the posdm data to ISR.
Regards
Abhijit

Excise Duty is not gettig posted in accounting doc

Dear Experts,
In one of my excisable plant, in pricing procedure, excise dutyeducation cesshigher edu cess is calcualted on the basis of base value, which is coming fine. But our requirement is that base valueexcise dutyeducation cess+higher edu cess, combine value should come in Net Value field while making order & invoice. Because of the same reason, excise duty value is not posted in FI, accouting doc of the same is not generating as only base value accounting documents got generated. I have tried by changing the subtotal value but it doesn't work. Kindly help.

Dear Prashant,
Thanks for reply, but i checked my excise cond types, in all conditions, cond cat is blank & cond class 'A' is maintained i.e. Discount & Surcharge.
My problem is that, my excise value is not got posted in net receivable value in accounts. This problem arise, when we make sales order, Net Value field doesn't pick excise there & while invoicing, it post only the base value & rounding off adjustments at header level. I don't know, from where this Net Value field in sales order is picking the value but my problem will solve if my grand total value(base valueexciseedu cess+higher edu cess) will pass to Net Value field while making sales order. Kindly help.

How can I generate IDOC(WPUUMS) from XML file in POSDM or in SAP Retail

Hallo Retail expert,
I have following scenario,
I have Retail Store who send me their daily sales report through Wincor Nixdorf Point of sale. There i am using standard POSLOG2 to SEEBURGER(its a middleware which act as Converter) xml format and then i post that data first in POSDM and then with BAPI i transfer or book that data to SAP Retail.
Above is the one scenario which is working.
This is the Second scenario.......
I have some external Retail store, they dont have Wincor Nixdorf POS, so they send me their Sales Report through SEEBURGER(its a middle Hardware which act as Converter) and SEEBURGER Convert that Sales data to XML format. My question is....
How can i upload or Convert a XML File into IDOC (WPUUMS)in SAP or in POSDM?
any new suggestion are welcome.
Thank you all in advance.
regards,
Niel

Hi,
1. To get the required XML Schema, use transaction code WE60 to go to the IDoc documentation -> enter the IDoc type you want to use (WPUUMS01). Flag control and data record. Then display the XSD by choosing Documentation -> XML Schema from the menue bar. Now you can donwload the XSD for usage in Seeburger.
2. Create your mapping from the POS format into the IDoc XML format in Seeburger.
3. Create an XML File Port in ERP or POS DM using transaction code WE21.
3. To inbound the XML file from Seeburger into POS DM or SAP Retail Seeburger should trigger the function module EDI_DATA_INCOMING. Parameters for this FM are the Pathname to the XML file and the Portname you just created. Based on the port name the FM can derive the port type xml and the data will be handled as XML data.
Regards Carsten

Recepient type not updating in entries posted through F-54

We have a scenario as follows
1. First we have made advance payment to vendor through F-48 with TDS posting.
2. We received 4 bills against these advance payment and we booked these bills with TDS posting.
3. We have used F-54 T-Code to nullify the TDS effect in FB60 and to process open item of FB60 against the advance payment through F-48.
Now it working fine while open item clearance ( there is 1Re.diff which we are rounding up).
But while making TDS payment through J1INCHLN two of the entries posted through F-54 ( KA Documents ) are not getting picked up as a result there is differenc between total TDS payable & what is shown in J1INCHLN open items.
On checking in WITH_ITEM table it is found that Receipent type is not updating for these particular entries.
Additional observation : we have three tds codes for basic, surcharge & E cess and three seperate line items are generated for each while posting TDS. It is observed that for these particular invoices as the amount is in hundreds the E cess amt is less than Re.1 so the only two line items are created i.e. Basic & Surchage.
Please guide us for solving this.
Thanks & Regars,
Chandrakant

Hi,
You have to check two tables :
T059C for Receipient types for country IN whether all the WH Types are maintained for CO and OT.
V_T001RWT - WHT Rounding Rules - normally it will be 100 for INR (min Re.1) you may have to change it.
Regards,
Sadashivan

Problem in value mapping in POSDM configuration!

Hi Experts,
                          I am sending data from POS to POSDM. I hav used standard name spaces like GM store Connectivity, BI and Store Connectivity 2.0. I hav also done settings in ID . Made a File adapter and RFC adapter and RD, ID, SA and RA settings.
Data from Sourse: GMTLogTransaction_out is going to the RFC :/POSDW/CREATE_TRANSACTIONS_EXT .
So I hope users can Understand I hav used standard mapping.
Now the issue is in the source structure a perticular field called TENDER ID is mapped with Target Field :Tender Code.
But there is a value mapping in between.
The name of the source Agency is IXREtailPOSLogRetailTransactionTenderID and schema is IXRetailPOSLogRetailTransactionTenderIDSchema and
The name of the Target Agency is POSDWTENDERTYPECODE and schema is POSDWTENDERTYPECODESCHEMA.
    And the Value mapping Context is : http://sap.com/xi/XI.
The problem is I can see this , but I cant assign any value as it is in disabled mode in Messege mapping.
Again In the ID I cannot see this Value mapping , which I expected to see and maniputale.
   experts, please tell me hw to I use this manipulate / incert some values so taht the input when 01 becomes 3101 at output.
If any doubts/ querioes, pls revert back.Please note , I am using all standard components in IR.
Regards,
Arnab .

Hi Arnab / Abhijith,
I am also going to work on the similar kind of requirement which u guys have worked.
Pos( third Party)->PI>POSDM-->IS-Retail ( Inbound)
IS-Retail-> PI->POS( third Party) ( Outbound)
Appreciate if you could help me with some clarifications..
1) What transactions we can update to POSDM..?
2) Does we need to POST all POS transactions first to POS DM and then IS-Retail ( Inbound).?
If that is the case, once transactions posted in POSDM, does we need to do any settings to post idocs automatically to Retail system .. (OR) do we need to develop interface again from POSDM>PI>IS-Retail.( please clarify).
Please suggest .. is it feasable to post only Non aggregated data directly to POSDM and Aggregated Sales ,FI , GRNs to directly to ECC.( Based on client requirement ).
Awaiting for your suggestions.. Please suggest the best appraoch
Thanks & Regards,
Suman

SURCHARGE ON VAT NOT CAPTURING CORRECTLY IN MIRO

Hello Experts,
       We've TAXINN procedure. Recently as per our client reqmt., we mapped Surcharge on VAT @ 10% with seperate surcharge conditions for all corresponding VAT conditions i.e. JVRD,JVRN,JVCD & JVCN.
        Now the particular scenario in which we r facing problem is as below:
              1. PO with excise duty, ECS,SECS, VAT & Surcharge created
              2. At the time of GR excise invoice is captured referring to vendor invoice due to which BED,ECS etc. with base amt. changed as per vendor invoice
               3. Excise invoice thrgh J1IEX posted
        Now the problem is at the time of MIRO simulation, VAT @ 12.5% is calculated based on GR, but Surcharge is dipalyed same as PO condition value. We want this to be calculated as per GR VAT.
       So pls. help me in this regard as I'm unable to point out the config. related error.
Thanks in Advance
       Amit
Edited by: Amit V Chavre on Feb 18, 2010 6:17 PM

>
Amit V Chavre wrote:
> Hello Experts,
>        We've TAXINN procedure. Recently as per our client reqmt., we mapped Surcharge on VAT @ 10% with seperate surcharge conditions for all corresponding VAT conditions i.e. JVRD,JVRN,JVCD & JVCN.
>         Now the particular scenario in which we r facing problem is as below:
>               1. PO with excise duty, ECS,SECS, VAT & Surcharge created
>               2. At the time of GR excise invoice is captured referring to vendor invoice due to which BED,ECS etc. with base amt. changed as per vendor invoice
>                3. Excise invoice thrgh J1IEX posted
>         Now the problem is at the time of MIRO simulation, VAT @ 12.5% is calculated based on GR, but Surcharge is dipalyed same as PO condition value. We want this to be calculated as per GR VAT.
>        So pls. help me in this regard as I'm unable to point out the config. related error.
>
> Thanks in Advance
>        Amit
>
> Edited by: Amit V Chavre on Feb 18, 2010 6:17 PM
I have faced a similar problem with additional tax on VAT which is present in Gujarat.
You are right, the surcharge does not get recalculated during MIRO because the system has not been designed to recalculate the surcharge (only VAT has been included).
You will have to change the behavior by means of a user exit in function module J_1I7_USEREXIT_PROCESS_TKOMV.
I had raised an OSS, and was recommended to use the above exit. You will have to modify the XKOMV-KWERT for the surcharge conditions, based on the value of VAT conditions.
Regards,
Aroop

Surcharge On PO For Delivery

Is it possible to maintain a surcharge per delivery on the PO? For instance, an item is purchased and is delivered in four deliveries. There is a surcharge for each delivery. The surcharge is not based on the quantity on the order and is not a surcharge for the total order.

hi
u can maintain unpanned delivery cost in miro
or u can activate direct gl posting ,by using which u can post a perticular amount in perticular gl acct
go to spro>mm>liv>incoming invoice >activate direct post to gl acct
regards
kunal

Incorrect TDS posting

Dear Experts,
I have created a service vendor and assigned EWT(TDS) tyeps and codes for Invoice and payment.
When I do MIRO for , say, Rs 10,000 system calculates & posts TDS correctly.
(TDS amount being, say, Basic:-100; Surcharge 10; Ecess 2 and HEcess 1 totaling to 113).
After MIRO posting amount payable to vendor is Rs 9887(i.e.10,000 less Rs 113).
When I am posting vendor payment(in F-53) of 9887, system is again calculating TDS of 113.
How do I get rid of this apart from removing EWT codes for payment from Withholding Tax Screen(tab) during MIRO posting?
I believe that TDS codes for payment are considered by system only at the time of down payment and not at the time of regular payment to vendor.
I hope I have query clearly. Awaiting for experts suggestion.
Regards
Anand

Hi
In the with holding tax type you have to assign the with holding tax type for payment and leave the space for with holding tax code for that line as blank. Hence, when you post TDS on outgoing payment transaction unless you specify the tax code for payment in the with holding tax tab.
Still if you want to assign the payment tax code, then at the time of booking of invoice, remove the tax code manually.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

POSDM : Post surcharge

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for