Possible to have weblogic 9 client use weblogic 8 jmx server?

I have a client that i want to run in weblogic 9, but it needs to access mbeans remotely in weblogic 8 servers.
At first I got the folowing error, which could be fixed by setting -Djmx.serial.form=1.0
Caused by: java.io.InvalidClassException: javax.management.ObjectName; local class incompatible: stream classdesc serialVersionUID = -5467795090068647408, local class serialVersionUID = 1081892073854801359
But now I have problems with other classes
Caused by: java.rmi.UnmarshalException: failed to unmarshal class weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedUser; nested exception is: java.io.StreamCorruptedException
Caused by: java.rmi.UnmarshalException: failed to unmarshal interface java.util.Set; nested exception is: java.io.StreamCorruptedException
It seems like it will not be possible. Is there any way for a jmx client running in weblogic 9 to access weblogic 8 mbeans?

Hello. Interesting, I posted a separate post just today about the same StreamCorruptedException when calling a RemoteEJB. The EJB is hosted on WLS 8.1.5 running on JSE 1.4. The client is running on WLS 10.0 running on JSE 6.
Did you ever get your issue resolved?
-Gregory

Similar Messages

I want to run automation test in multiple device say iphone and ipad or two iphone device Is it possible.I have done automation testing using UIAutomation and get it running from iphone device

I want to run automation test in multiple device say iphone and ipad or two iphone device Is it possible.I have done automation testing using UIAutomation and get it running from iphone device

plzzz reply to this question as soon as possible

I have CS5 a client uses CS5.5 please help...

I have CS5 but my new client uses CS5.5 is there any way to open their files in CS5 or is there any way they could save it another way on their machine so I can open it in CS5. I do not want at all to upgrade to CS5.5 right now. Is there any other way... ??

Bob:
there is no etc for IDML. It’s only compatible with 5.5, 5 and 4.
There's plenty of etc! I actually meant there were other uses than file conversion to older versions. Basically anytime you want to feed an XML representation of the entire InDesign layout to some other tool. I realize this only comes up every day for a small few of us :-).
had a real-world failure thanks to an IDML exported from 5.5 so i could work with it in 5... on a one page document (was a carton). a picture changed size and position. no way for me to have known without a hard copy or PDF... luckily it was noticed by the client while on proof, but it paves the way for catastrophes if they didn't notice.
As you describe it, this behavior sounds like a fairly serious bug. Did you file it, or find any explanation for it? Do you still have the example?
Did the IDML change size/position when re-opened in CS5.5?
That sort of thing is not normal... (But certainly it is possible.)

Is it possible to have an iPod and use 2 different iTunes accounts on it?

My son's father is buying him an iPod 4th Gen for Christmas. I have NO experience with i-products. I was saying to his father that I want to set up our son (who is 8) his own iTunes account so I can monitor what is downlaoded on his iPod and such. He tells me that he was going to add him onto his own so that he will be able to share his apps with him. So, my question is, if dad puts his apps on there, will I still be able to sign my son up for his own account?

Welcome to the Apple Community.
No, he should only use one account.

EJB Client using https (SSL) with Server 8.1.3/8.1.4

We have Swing client trying to use weblogic thin client to talk to weblogic server using https.
If we try to use thin client wlclient.jar with https
JAAS Authenticatio, lookups nothing works
If we try to use weblogic.jar from client we need to use license.bea in classpath.
How can we use thin client jar or equivalent without needing license.bea in client classpath?
We tried to create our own thin client but without license.bea it doesn't work.
Plesae give some suggestions or pointers. I have seen this raised many times but there is no conclusion on this topic.
Thanks

We have Swing client trying to use weblogic thin client to talk to weblogic server using https.
If we try to use thin client wlclient.jar with https
JAAS Authenticatio, lookups nothing works
If we try to use weblogic.jar from client we need to use license.bea in classpath.
How can we use thin client jar or equivalent without needing license.bea in client classpath?
We tried to create our own thin client but without license.bea it doesn't work.
Plesae give some suggestions or pointers. I have seen this raised many times but there is no conclusion on this topic.
Thanks

When client use socket to connect server, server how to get client IP

as topic

Your ServerSocket has an accept() method that gives you a Socket. The Socket class has a getInetAddress() method... I'll let you continue reading the API documentation from here.

C++ Client using Visibroker to talk to Weblogic 7.0 EJB

Error when trying to have a C++ Client use the Visibroker ORB talk to a Weblogic
7.0 EJB. This happens even after I add: DefaultMinorVersion="1" to the config.xml's
IIOP element.
The error produced is:
Exception: Exception: CORBA::CODESET_INCOMPATIBLE
Minor: 1330446336
Completion Status: NO
and happens when the client uses the home interface to create an instance.
Thanks in advance for any advise.
Alex

"Alex" <[email protected]> writes:
Although Visibroker 5.02 does support codeset negotiation and proper
encoding under GIOP 1.2 (previous versions did not), it still has a
bug wrt negotiation of standard string codesets. If you read the
example notes
(samples/examples/iiop/ejb/stateless/cppclient/package-summary.html)
you will see this:
Visibroker 5.0
You may now also build this example with visibroker 5.0. to do so, you must make the following changes from the instructions below:
1.You need to specify utf-16/iso-8859-1 as the default native codesets. Change your config.xml within the Server mbean to include the
following:
<Server> <IIOP DefaultCharCodeset="iso-8859-1" DefaultWideCharCodeset="utf-16" Name="myserver"/>
</Server>
2.Do not use GIOP 1.1, and do not use the DefaultMinorVersion entry in your config.xml, this gets specified in the step below.
3.When running the client you need to use a full corbaloc url (Note the '1.2', which specifies GIOP version. Change:
Client -ORBInitRef NameService=iioploc://localhost:7001/NameService
to:
Client -ORBInitRef NameService=corbaloc:iiop:1.2@localhost:7001/NameService
andy
Forgot to mention, I am using Visibroker 5.02.
"Alex" <[email protected]> wrote:
Error when trying to have a C++ Client use the Visibroker ORB talk to
a Weblogic
7.0 EJB. This happens even after I add: DefaultMinorVersion="1" to the
config.xml's
IIOP element.
The error produced is:
Exception: Exception: CORBA::CODESET_INCOMPATIBLE
Minor: 1330446336
Completion Status: NO
and happens when the client uses the home interface to create an instance.
Thanks in advance for any advise.
Alex

Re: Runing Forte Runtime Clients using a Firewall

Kamran,
There is an environment variable, FORTE_LOCATIONS, that controls which
port a partition connects over.
David
----Original Message Follows----
Has anybody had to deal with have Forte runtime clients use a firewall?
Who
did you configure the firewall to allow Forte runtime clients to talk to
the
deployed application on the other side of the firewall? Is there any
way to
configure your deployed application to use certain sockets so that you
can
configure the firewall to let client's ip traffic go through using those
sockets? We are using 95 clients and a IBM application server for our
central environment. The firewall will be in the middle monitoring the
traffic. Any suggestion or help would great be appreciated. Thanks in
advance.
ka
Kamran Amin
Forte Technical Leader, Core Systems
(203)-459-7362 or 8-204-7362 - Trumbull
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Kamran,
There is an environment variable, FORTE_LOCATIONS, that controls which
port a partition connects over.
David
----Original Message Follows----
Has anybody had to deal with have Forte runtime clients use a firewall?
Who
did you configure the firewall to allow Forte runtime clients to talk to
the
deployed application on the other side of the firewall? Is there any
way to
configure your deployed application to use certain sockets so that you
can
configure the firewall to let client's ip traffic go through using those
sockets? We are using 95 clients and a IBM application server for our
central environment. The firewall will be in the middle monitoring the
traffic. Any suggestion or help would great be appreciated. Thanks in
advance.
ka
Kamran Amin
Forte Technical Leader, Core Systems
(203)-459-7362 or 8-204-7362 - Trumbull
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Runing Forte Runtime Clients using a Firewall

Has anybody had to deal with have Forte runtime clients use a firewall? Who
did you configure the firewall to allow Forte runtime clients to talk to the
deployed application on the other side of the firewall? Is there any way to
configure your deployed application to use certain sockets so that you can
configure the firewall to let client's ip traffic go through using those
sockets? We are using 95 clients and a IBM application server for our
central environment. The firewall will be in the middle monitoring the
traffic. Any suggestion or help would great be appreciated. Thanks in
advance.
ka
Kamran Amin
Forte Technical Leader, Core Systems
(203)-459-7362 or 8-204-7362 - Trumbull
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Yes, please. Actually I'm aware of all you've said. What I'm trying to apply is not a custom build step but a custom tool. (You select the specific file and in properties you're able to set a Custom Tool and Custom Tool Namespace to it)
In my platform specific projects custom tool works fine but in shared project doesn't. Does custom tools work using a custom build step in code behind so that's why I can't apply them to my Shared Project?
Regards

Issue w/ Case Differences Using the IBM Directory Server MA

We have the following issue using the IBM Directory Server MA using FIM 2010 R2 (Version 4.1.3479.0).
We provision a new object, e.g., uid=jdoe,ou=users,o=contoso, into an instance of IBM Directory Server
The object is created in IBM Directory Server as uid=jdoe,ou=users,o=contoso
A Full Import on the IBM Directory Server MA runs and confirms the export
Subsequent imports, sync, and exports run successfully
<Time passes>
A Full Import on the IBM Directory Server MA runs, and this object shows up as a staging-error (uid=jdoe,ou=Users,o=contoso)
Subsequent imports and syncs report errors on this object (staging-error)
Note that we do not manipulate the anchor (DN) of this object once it is created in IBM Directory Server. Other attributes are synchronized, but the object is never renamed/moved. This case change does not happen with all of the objects brought
in during the Full Import, but the number of instances do increase periodically. At this point, it does look like the import is changing from a lowercase "u" to an uppercase "U" but not vice versa.
I found a related
TechNet article containing the following remark:
"IBM Directory Server does not guarantee that the case of a DN component will match in all instances. On a synchronization or import from IBM Directory Server, this can manifest itself as an unexpected update. For example, if you create
O=TEST, and then create the user cn=MikeDan,O=TEST, this might be imported from IBM Directory Server as
cn=MikeDan,O=test. Because of the case difference, FIM treats this as an update on subsequent full imports."
Unfortunately, the article does not propose a resolution.
Has anyone encountered this issue? More importantly has anyone resolved this or found an acceptable workaround?
Note that deleting the connector space is not an acceptable workaround. :)

I remember experiencing this issue when we were on 5.0, and I believe it persists through 5.1 as well.
There is a comment in the 5.2 release notes that something similar was fixed:
Changing case sensitive attribute values failed in MMR. (4624693)
If I had to take a wild guess, I would say that the server does some internal checking to see if the value has changed, possibly based on the attribute syntax, to avoid replicating "changes" that really don't change anything except case. I doubt that all your custom attributes are case-sensitive, though. Enabling replication probably "turns on" this behavior, which doesn't go away even if replication is disabled.
In any case, you're probably out of luck unless/until you upgrade to 5.2.

Can java mail be used for distributed exchange server?

H,
I am trying to connect to MS Exchange Server to read my mails using Java Mail API.
I have a questions about using it with Exchange server.
We have 6-7 exchange servers in our company and different users have mailboxes on different servers. My internet mail application will be used by everybody in the company.
But while connecting to exchange server using java mail I can only cnnnect to one server and port. What happens when user mailbox is not on that server. How can I use javamail in this scenario where user mailboxes are on separate servers??
Thanks
[email protected]

You said that you can connect to Exchange server my you help me with this because i cant connect to Exchange server, mayby you can post me a code example? Thanks

Oracle 8i Client running on Windows 2000 Server

Hi,
I have Oracle 8i Client running on Windows 2000 Server. I need to connect to Oracle 8i Server running on Sun Box.
I have problems with connectivity.
When I do tnsping <service name>, I am geting the followiing
error:
C:\>tnsping <Instance name>
TNS Ping Utility for 32-bit Windows: Version 8.1.7.0.0 - Production on 04-FEB-20
02 16:37:01
(c) Copyright 1997 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Attempting to contact (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=<IP Address>)(PORT=1521)) TNS-12541: TNS:no listener
Can any one help me out
Thanks
mka

Hi,
I have Oracle 8i Client running on Windows 2000 Server. I need to connect to Oracle 8i Server running on Sun Box.
I have problems with connectivity.
When I do tnsping <service name>, I am geting the followiing
error:
C:\>tnsping <Instance name>
TNS Ping Utility for 32-bit Windows: Version 8.1.7.0.0 - Production on 04-FEB-20
02 16:37:01
(c) Copyright 1997 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Attempting to contact (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=<IP Address>)(PORT=1521)) TNS-12541: TNS:no listener
Can any one help me out
Thanks
mka

Memory leak in a client using EJBs deployed in a Bea Weblogic 10.0.0 cluste

Hi all,
We are having a memory leak in a client using stateless EJBs deployed in cluster. The client is a Tomcat 6.0.18 with java 6 but it is reproduced using Tomcat 5 with java 5. The client is calling a Weblogic Server 10.0 making
calls to an EJB deployed in cluster that has two instances installed in two different machines.
The client works fine if we shutdown one of the server instances and so when the client is using only one instance.
Resuming the environment:
Client Side:
1 HP-Itanium machine with HP-UX.
1 Tomcat 6 with java 6 (reproduced with java 5)
Bea Weblogic client (wlclient.jar) for Weblogic 10.0.0
Server Side:
2 HP-Itanium machines with HP-UX
Bea Weblogic Server 10.0.0 installed in both machines
An unique domain
Two Bea instances (one per machines) associated to a Bea Cluster
EJBs deployed in both instances
We have monitored the memory consumed in Tomcat and we have noticed that the VM memory PS OLD GEN grows up permanently when we make tests having the two server side Bea Instances up. We have extended
the memory VM parameters in Tomcat client till 1G and it's only a way to delay the end: the free memory is empty, the GC is not able to free no more byte and the CPU is 100% consumed by the GC work. At the end Tomcat Client
doesn't accept more http petitions and must be restarted.
Besides, we have studied the VM memory in Tomcat using jmap and importing it using Eclipse Memory Analyzer. We have seen some strange memory blocks of several Mbytes that are always growing up and that are stored
under data structures in the package com.sun.corba:
com.sun.corba.se.impl.legacy.connection.SocketFactoryConnectionImpl (4.5Mb)
|
-> com.sun.corba.se.impl.transport.CorbaResponseWaitingRoomImpl
|
-> java.util.Hashtable
|
-> java.util.Hashtable$Entry
|
-> java.util.Hashtable$Entry
-> java.util.Hashtable$Entry
-> java.util.Hashtable$Entry
Has anybody any idea about this problem?
Thanks in advance.

Hi all,
We are having a memory leak in a client using stateless EJBs deployed in cluster. The client is a Tomcat 6.0.18 with java 6 but it is reproduced using Tomcat 5 with java 5. The client is calling a Weblogic Server 10.0 making
calls to an EJB deployed in cluster that has two instances installed in two different machines.
The client works fine if we shutdown one of the server instances and so when the client is using only one instance.
Resuming the environment:
Client Side:
1 HP-Itanium machine with HP-UX.
1 Tomcat 6 with java 6 (reproduced with java 5)
Bea Weblogic client (wlclient.jar) for Weblogic 10.0.0
Server Side:
2 HP-Itanium machines with HP-UX
Bea Weblogic Server 10.0.0 installed in both machines
An unique domain
Two Bea instances (one per machines) associated to a Bea Cluster
EJBs deployed in both instances
We have monitored the memory consumed in Tomcat and we have noticed that the VM memory PS OLD GEN grows up permanently when we make tests having the two server side Bea Instances up. We have extended
the memory VM parameters in Tomcat client till 1G and it's only a way to delay the end: the free memory is empty, the GC is not able to free no more byte and the CPU is 100% consumed by the GC work. At the end Tomcat Client
doesn't accept more http petitions and must be restarted.
Besides, we have studied the VM memory in Tomcat using jmap and importing it using Eclipse Memory Analyzer. We have seen some strange memory blocks of several Mbytes that are always growing up and that are stored
under data structures in the package com.sun.corba:
com.sun.corba.se.impl.legacy.connection.SocketFactoryConnectionImpl (4.5Mb)
|
-> com.sun.corba.se.impl.transport.CorbaResponseWaitingRoomImpl
|
-> java.util.Hashtable
|
-> java.util.Hashtable$Entry
|
-> java.util.Hashtable$Entry
-> java.util.Hashtable$Entry
-> java.util.Hashtable$Entry
Has anybody any idea about this problem?
Thanks in advance.

Webapp client using weblogic-generated stubs

Hi,
I have a simple webservice that has been tested for a while and works without
any trouble when
accessed from a standalone java client using the weblogic-generated webservice
stubs.
I am trying to code a webapp client (using jsp/struts) using the same stubs, and
seem to keep
getting this error. It appears on the client side, doesn't even reach the server
side.
I am using weblogic 8.1 SP1. (It is interesting that even though everything was
compiled and
deployed with weblogic 8.1, there is some reference to 7.0-- which is not even
installed on the
system, so I don't know where it is coming from.)
<May 7, 2004 12:58:23 PM EDT> <Info> <WebService> <BEA-220025> <Handler weblogic.webservice.core.handler.ClientHandler
threw an exception from its handleResponse method. The exception was:
java.lang.IllegalAccessError: Already connected.>
java.rmi.RemoteException: SOAP Fault:javax.xml.rpc.soap.SOAPFaultException: Exception
during processing: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: Already connected (see Fault
Detail for stacktrace)
Detail:
<detail>
<bea_fault:stacktrace xmlns:bea_fault="http://www.bea.com/servers/wls70/webservice/fault/1.0.0">
</bea_fault:stacktrace>java.lang.IllegalAccessError: Already connected
at weblogic.net.http.HttpURLConnection.setRequestProperty(Ljava.lang.String;Ljava.lang.String;)V(HttpURLConnection.java:570)
at com.hp.ov.ipa.instr.bip.HttpURLConnectionArmInstrumentation.methodEntry(Ljava.lang.Object;Ljava.lang.Object;Ljava.lang.Object;I)Ljava.lang.Object;(HttpURLConnectionArmInstrumentation.java:98)
at weblogic.net.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream()Ljava.io.InputStream;(HttpURLConnection.java:???)
at weblogic.net.http.HttpURLConnection.getHeaderField(Ljava.lang.String;)Ljava.lang.String;(HttpURLConnection.java:542)
at java.net.URLConnection.getContentType()Ljava.lang.String;(URLConnection.java:381)
at weblogic.webservice.binding.http11.Http11ClientBinding.receive(Ljavax.xml.rpc.handler.MessageContext;)V(Http11ClientBinding.java:202)
at weblogic.webservice.core.handler.ClientHandler.handleResponse(Ljavax.xml.rpc.handler.MessageContext;)Z(ClientHandler.java:63)
at weblogic.webservice.core.HandlerChainImpl.handleResponse(Ljavax.xml.rpc.handler.MessageContext;)Z(HandlerChainImpl.java:230)
at weblogic.webservice.core.ClientDispatcher.receive(Lweblogic.webservice.WLMessageContext;)Ljava.lang.Object;(ClientDispatcher.java:229)
at weblogic.webservice.core.ClientDispatcher.dispatch([Ljava.lang.Object;)Ljava.lang.Object;(ClientDispatcher.java:144)
at weblogic.webservice.core.DefaultOperation.invoke(Ljava.util.Map;[Ljava.lang.Object;Ljava.io.PrintStream;)Ljava.lang.Object;(DefaultOperation.java:444)
at weblogic.webservice.core.DefaultOperation.invoke(Ljava.util.Map;[Ljava.lang.Object;)Ljava.lang.Object;(DefaultOperation.java:430)
at weblogic.webservice.core.rpc.StubImpl._invoke(Ljava.lang.String;Ljava.util.Map;)Ljava.lang.Object;(StubImpl.java:270)
Thanks in advance,
E

Hi,
Thanks for your help with this. As it turns out, I received this message from
the weblogic team here:
=======
All,
The J2EE monitoring tool OVTA rolled out to Weblogic Farm Linux QA and Stage environment
had a bug in the instrumentation. The bug induces a java.lang.IllegalAccessError.
A patch as been rolled out to fix this issue.
=======
Once the patch was rolled out and weblogic was restarted, the issue disappeared.
Thanks again for your help!
E
Bruce Stephens <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
What is
com.hp.ov.ipa.instr.bip.HttpURLConnectionArmInstrumentation.methodEntry
at the time of failure?
If you could provide a short reproducer, we could give it a spin; or
open a dialog with our support team.
Thanks,
Bruce
Elisheva G wrote:
Hi, thanks for responding.
I have precisely the same client jsp running without any errors onapache tomcat
accessing
webservices residing in weblogic 8.1 It's only when I try to migratethe client
code from tomcat
to weblogic that I see this "already connected" exception being thrownfrom within
the weblogic-
generated stubs.
I successfully get a port from the service, but when I try to executethe business
method in the
port, that is where the exception is thrown -- consistently.
Any ideas? I am seeing identical behavior on 2 different applications.
Thanks in advance,
E
Bruce Stephens <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
The 7.0 reference is a namespace and not a problem and not associated
with your issue. I think you are seeing normal process threading
issues
with jsp sessions. There is an example using a jsp [1] and one with
SSL
[2] that you might want to examine.
HTH,
Bruce
[1]
http://manojc.com/?sample28
[2]
http://webservice.bea.com/clientauth.zip
Elisheva G wrote:
Hi,
I have a simple webservice that has been tested for a while and
works
without
any trouble when
accessed from a standalone java client using the weblogic-generatedwebservice
stubs.
I am trying to code a webapp client (using jsp/struts) using the
same
stubs, and
seem to keep
getting this error. It appears on the client side, doesn't even
reach
the server
side.
I am using weblogic 8.1 SP1. (It is interesting that even though
everything
was
compiled and
deployed with weblogic 8.1, there is some reference to 7.0-- whichis not even
installed on the
system, so I don't know where it is coming from.)
<May 7, 2004 12:58:23 PM EDT> <Info> <WebService> <BEA-220025> <Handlerweblogic.webservice.core.handler.ClientHandler
threw an exception from its handleResponse method. The exception
was:
java.lang.IllegalAccessError: Already connected.>
java.rmi.RemoteException: SOAP Fault:javax.xml.rpc.soap.SOAPFaultException:Exception
during processing: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: Already connected(see Fault
Detail for stacktrace)
Detail:
<detail>
<bea_fault:stacktrace xmlns:bea_fault="http://www.bea.com/servers/wls70/webservice/fault/1.0.0">
</bea_fault:stacktrace>java.lang.IllegalAccessError: Already connected
at weblogic.net.http.HttpURLConnection.setRequestProperty(Ljava.lang.String;Ljava.lang.String;)V(HttpURLConnection.java:570)
at com.hp.ov.ipa.instr.bip.HttpURLConnectionArmInstrumentation.methodEntry(Ljava.lang.Object;Ljava.lang.Object;Ljava.lang.Object;I)Ljava.lang.Object;(HttpURLConnectionArmInstrumentation.java:98)
at weblogic.net.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream()Ljava.io.InputStream;(HttpURLConnection.java:???)
at weblogic.net.http.HttpURLConnection.getHeaderField(Ljava.lang.String;)Ljava.lang.String;(HttpURLConnection.java:542)
at java.net.URLConnection.getContentType()Ljava.lang.String;(URLConnection.java:381)
at weblogic.webservice.binding.http11.Http11ClientBinding.receive(Ljavax.xml.rpc.handler.MessageContext;)V(Http11ClientBinding.java:202)
at weblogic.webservice.core.handler.ClientHandler.handleResponse(Ljavax.xml.rpc.handler.MessageContext;)Z(ClientHandler.java:63)
at weblogic.webservice.core.HandlerChainImpl.handleResponse(Ljavax.xml.rpc.handler.MessageContext;)Z(HandlerChainImpl.java:230)
at weblogic.webservice.core.ClientDispatcher.receive(Lweblogic.webservice.WLMessageContext;)Ljava.lang.Object;(ClientDispatcher.java:229)
at weblogic.webservice.core.ClientDispatcher.dispatch([Ljava.lang.Object;)Ljava.lang.Object;(ClientDispatcher.java:144)
at weblogic.webservice.core.DefaultOperation.invoke(Ljava.util.Map;[Ljava.lang.Object;Ljava.io.PrintStream;)Ljava.lang.Object;(DefaultOperation.java:444)
at weblogic.webservice.core.DefaultOperation.invoke(Ljava.util.Map;[Ljava.lang.Object;)Ljava.lang.Object;(DefaultOperation.java:430)
at weblogic.webservice.core.rpc.StubImpl._invoke(Ljava.lang.String;Ljava.util.Map;)Ljava.lang.Object;(StubImpl.java:270)
Thanks in advance,
E

Disabling Weblogic's http server port - Using an external web server

Hi,
We are using Weblogic 8.1 as application server and IWS as web server. We have
siteminder web agent configured on the web server for implementing authentication
and authorization.
All our requests first go to the web server which redirects them to the application
server.
Since Weblogic itself has a http listen port, user can still send requests directly
to the application server(which does not have any siteminder configuration on
it). Is it possible to ensure that all http requests made directly to the application
server are not processed so that the user is forced to hit the web server first.
Thanks,
Akash

When you say redirect, do you mean you use an HTTP redirect to send it to your
WLS servers URL? Or do you mean you proxy the requests from the webserver to
the WLS instance? In the former case, you must expose WLS's HTTP server to the
clients in order to redirect them to the address and you will not be able to
stop them from going directly there. In the case of the latter, you can put
your WLS instance behind the firewall so external users can't get to it. If you
also need to protect it from internal users you should probably not use
siteminder as your authentication mechanism. You may be able to configure
siteminder so that it has to authenticate itself to send requests to weblogic
and then protect all weblogic resources with that role requirement.
Sam
[email protected] wrote:
Hi,
We are using Weblogic 8.1 as application server and IWS as web server. We have
siteminder web agent configured on the web server for implementing authentication
and authorization.
All our requests first go to the web server which redirects them to the application
server.
Since Weblogic itself has a http listen port, user can still send requests directly
to the application server(which does not have any siteminder configuration on
it). Is it possible to ensure that all http requests made directly to the application
server are not processed so that the user is forced to hit the web server first.
Thanks,
Akash

Possible to have weblogic 9 client use weblogic 8 jmx server?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for