Possible work flow Shoot(RAW)-Aperture-CS2-Aperture-output

I have Aperture installed on two machines, my 15" 1.5Ghz/1.5GB-RAM and on my PoweMac dual 2Ghz G5/2 GB RAM and the speed is acceptable on both so far.
On the PowerMac I moved the Aperture library to a second SATA drive, which should speed things up a bit.
I have not had enough time to envelope myself in Aperture, only a hour here and there.... work keeps getting in the way But so far it looks like I could change my workflow.
CS2 cannot be removed from my workflow as I tweak all final images before output(print and jpg/tiff) in CS2. Layers and the healing brush is key in portrait work.
My workflow from shoot to output with D2X has been:
-Shoot(all RAW)
-FW transfer of files into date+clientname-named directory structure
-Bridge to sort, rank, annotate, etc
-ACR to make adjustments to files, copy and paste raw settings is great as well as synchronize make for quick post processing
-Web gallery is easy enough and IMO looks better than Aperture's
-Shots selected for final output by client are then opened in CS2, tweaked, cleaned, improved, vignettes applied, etc(according to client and contract), then saved off as jpg level 10(rarely as tiff)
--If it is a big or important portrait, I will save a PSD file with the layers etc
-Bridge to annotate the finished shots
-Output to Epson R2400 or lab
-Archive directory with sidecar files to two(just in case!) CD or DVD(depending on size)
While I can see a workflow improvement with Aperture replacing Bridge and ACR, issues I see:
-Aperture RAW conversions are not on par with ACR
-Raw workflow in Aperture is a completely different animal than ACR
-White balance in Aperture is hard to use
-Plugins? Like the vignette tool in ACR to dodge(great for white backgrounds) or burn corners
Possible pluses so far:
-More control over colors, luminance, etc in Aperture, although at the cost of simplicity(yes, this will diminish over time with more experience)
-The loupe tool is great, when it is too slow on the PB, I just use the "Z" key for toggling 100%..
-Integration of the photo books, although CS2 has something similar from Ofoto
-Stacking(this could be added to Bridge though)
-Vaults for archiving
-Coolness for being an Apple application(yes it is a cult and yes I joined of my own free will)
So, when 10.4.4 comes out with tweaks to Aperture like RAW conversions being on par with ACR and white balance tool option/fix, I could see Aperture replacing Bridge and ACR in my work flow.
Given my past four years with Apple and one iBook, two Powerbooks, two PowerMacs, one Indigo iMac, all of the OS X versions, and Final Cut Express, I have faith that the Aperture team is working feverishly to get theses initial issues fixed and am certain version two will be even better, AND encourage Adobe to add more wiz to their already great product, PhotoShop.
Tonight I will try this workflow, where I do the RAW conversion, send to CS2, and save back to Aperture....
So much to fiddle with, so little time!

I'd love to hear how this works out for you as your workflow is virtually identical to mine. I haven't devoted much time to Aperture as I'm preparing for an xmas vacation and am hoping a big patch (or two!) are en route.
Rob

Similar Messages

  • Work Flow + Two External Drives + Aperture -vs- iView MediaPro

    Greetings!
    Hoped for end result: 30 GB of photos available at home and office. Freed up hard drive space on MacBook Pro. An organized system for locating photos.
    I am seeking to break my old photo workflow paradigm.
    Recently, I have moved 30 GB of images from iPhoto to an external drive (actually to two different external drives). I do not plan to use iPhoto in the future (only minimal use). Insights on the following would be appreciated:
    (1) I have two - FreeAgent Pro - hard drives - 750 GB. One at home and the other in my office. The data on both drives (i.e. 30 GB of image) is identical. A GENEROUS amount of space is still available on these external drives. Just completed this process / setting up both identical drives last night ... identical images at the office and home.
    (2) My hoped for outcome is to be able to access my photos at work / home and have some program (Aperture -vs- iView MediaPro) to manage the work flow. Thus, keeping my MacBook Pro hard drive freed up.
    (3) The majority of Apple Discussion users seem dedicated to using Aperture. What do you see as the benefits of Aperture -vs- iView MediaPro? Yes, I know the latter in now owned my MS.
    (4) Still not totally sure, the best way, to workflow my photos with with the dual external drives and Aperture. Your guidance, please.
    (5) Here is a possible scenario (example):
    STEP ONE - (at home) download a new batch of photos (Olympus E-1, high res jpeg's, no raw) onto my macBook Pro (MBP) into folder "A".
    STEP TWO - process (ingest) ... move the new photos into Aperture.
    STEP THREE - load them into my home external drive.
    STEP FOUR - The next time I am in the office load the original jpegs (folder "A") onto my office external drive.
    STEP FIVE - Delete the originals photos from folder "A", keeping my MBP hard drive space freed up.
    STEP SIX - unsure ... somehow connect the new photos on the office external drive with Aperture (or iView MediaPro).
    Where have I missed the boat?! Scrambled things up?! Does this make sense?
    For what I am seeking to accomplish, will iView MediaPro accomplish what Aperture could perform?
    Kind regards,
    Bill Siegrist
    [email protected]

    Bill-
    If all you are doing is managing 30 GB of pre-existing JPEGs in 2007 iVMP is probably superior. However I would venture a guess that you also intend to capture new images with your DSLR. For that you very much want Aperture. And IMO moving to 2008 and beyond Aperture's potential far exceeds iVMP's.
    And you did note that iVMP is now owned by MS; not good.
    Solving an entire workflow is not something easily done in a few forum paragraphs. I strongly recommend that every DSLR photog with adequate computer hardware first spend $33 and work through the tutorial CD Apple Pro Training Series: Aperture 1.5 (Apple Pro Training) by Orlando Luna and Ben Long (Paperback - Oct 18, 2006).
    Have the CD and a MacIntel with 2 GB or preferably more of RAM prior to ordering the Aperture trial so you don't waste time of the 30 day trial. Note that the value is in the tutorial, not in using the book as a manual. Due to the limited hard drive capacity, anyone with a laptop should focus on developing a "Reference Masters" workflow.
    You say JPEGs, no RAW. I would in the strongest possible terms recommend that you consider switching to a RAW workflow. In addition to allowing extraordinary post process editing, RAW image files contain much more image data. I believe that your DSLR will capture up to a dozen RAW pix before the buffer fills. Shooting JPEGs is a serious under utilization of a capable DSLR.
    -Allen Wicks

  • Aperture Work flow or an alternative

    I am an amateur photographer using a nikon d70. I am now shooting in raw to get a better control on the output, but also with more pictures to process as result. I have used Photoshop elements with ACR for work flow processing. I use iview pro for file handling. Downside of ACR in the PS elements mode is that filmstrip and multiple picture handling is missing. I have tried trial version of Bibble 4, Capture one and PS CS 2 for their workflow and white balance results. I came to the conclusion that PS CS provides in WB adjustment best results with different pictures. As a Mac user I am aware of the aperture features as advertised in their QuickTime movies. I have also seen the discussion on hardware requirements and WB issue. But the aperture work flow setup is tempting (keep the work flow in the raw domain and does not change the original raw file). There are two routes to follow: A. buy full version of PS CS and stay with current hardware. B. buy Aperture with adjusted hardware. Price tags are totally different and are of my own concern. Question: advice on the road to go without price tag consideration.
    Imac G5   Mac OS X (10.3.9)  

    You could have a workflow that is non-destructive with Photosohp CS2 by using Bridge. It's very effective and will give you more and better control that those other alternatives - except Aperture. I've been using Aperture for two days now and I have to say I'm really getting to like it. Though on my dual 2Ghz G5 (1st generation) with a Radeon 9800 Pro and 3.5 gigs of RAM it can be a tad bit slow. I'm sure some optimization will occur in the next update or two to speed things up.
    Bottom line, I think Aperture's workflow looks promising. And I really like a lot of the benefits of working in a totally 16 bit environment where I don't have to manually handle the files and their locations, or the sidecar files or anything else. And I can export files directly for whatever purpose I might have.
    So my first choice, for your question would be Aperture. Second choice would be Bridge and PS CS2.
    G5 Dual 2Ghz G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

  • Working with RAW & aperture

    I am new to aperture and hope somebody can help me to understand how to do something. I have a Nikon D200 and shoot only raw files. I have over 10,000 cataloged RAW files that I converted to DNG before archiving. I have been doing this with bridge and Iview but after seeing aperture I am very impressed!!
    Aperture does open my NEF & DNG files but I don't see where I would go to change the white balance. When I open a NEF or DNG file directly in CS2 I can at that point work in camera raw first to do adjustments such as change the white balance from auto to cloudy. When I have a NEF file in Aperture and use cs2 as en external editor I no longer get the camera raw functionality. The file will open in CS2 as a PSD file and I lose the camera raw functionality.
    How can make adjustments in camera raw?

    Download these Apple movies on Aperture. I watched them all and learned a lot about Aperture.
    I just selected all the links at once and dragged into the download window of safari and they all came in very fast. If you have a high speed connection at least.
    http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20060926074757255
    Or go to the apple site and watch them
    http://movies.apple.com/aperture/resources/tutorial/

  • IPhoto or Aperture--Which work-flow?

    I have several thousand digital pics and some small video clips that need to be cataloged and managed in some type of database. I have some experience with: iPhoto, iViewMedia Pro and Aperture. I have use those applications; yet, I don't have enough current experience to help me to understand the best work-flow... I'm leaning toward the use of iPhoto and Aperture.
    I need to accomplish the following:
    -Searchable Database of media...
    -Keywords and other meta-data in use...
    -A flexible workflow that allows me to have the most options available as the images are repurposed...
    -Maximum protection of this media...
    -Do not want to ever lose the integrity of the original images...
    -Need the ability to identify duplicates during import... iPhoto does this... I'm not sure that Aperture does.
    I was thinking that I would need to use at least two applications... for example, I could possible use Aperture as the first stop and main repository of ALL digital media and dump things to iPhoto as needed for special iPhoto features that are not available in something like Aperture. Any, ideas on proven work-flows?
    Also, I need to make other decsions:
    -File Renaming. Many "experts" say that ALL incoming media should be renamed... Well, I'm not sure that's the best thing unless the new name retains a vital portion of the old name since you may have a need to reference the original file name to retrieve it from somewhere or to ID it's source, etc... What are your thoughts about renaming files?
    -Dealing with duplicates... How do you handle this? Assume that you have many gigs of files from multiple locations and you want to build ONE library of unique images...
    -Use References or allow the media to be managed? iPhoto and Aperture both support two different methods of utilizing your images which is in effect during import... you either import via reference or you allow the application to manage your library based on meta-data (primarily date info)... Well, what method should I use and why? Currently, most of my images are grouped into folders that indicate approximate date of the images and the source (ex: "NanCam_20061231"). Also, I will want to integrate or add to my library (no matter how I manage it) some unique pics from an iPhoto library that is being managed by iPhoto... just think of this as a collection of images with a different folder organization than mentioned above. So, what method do you recommend and why?
    -If nothing has been imported, what workflow do you suggest? At the moment, I do not require the features of Aperture (but I would like to begin using it very soon), so I could start using iPhoto 6. I have some ideas yet I would rather not load the question... What do you recommend?
    As I write this, I'm thinking that I should toss everything into iPhoto with the idea that something is better than nothing. However, I wanted to internalize a game-plan or work-flow that I could hang my hat on and not have to think about this so much--ideas?
    Thanks,
    Robert

    Robert:
    You might want to look at The DAM Book by by Peter Krogh. It's essentially the bible among professional photographers for managing image files. It can answer you questions.
    For me here's my workflow (I use both iView MediaPro and iPhoto):
    1 - upload each shoot immediately to a folder on the desktop.
    2 - date and name that folder: 01/30/07-Disneyland trip
    3 - put that folder in with my other source folder and import into iView.
    4 - batch rename those files with the international date format and brief description: 2007-01-30-Disneyland trip-001.jpg, -002.jpg, etc.
    5 - import that folder into iPhoto giving me a roll with same name as the folder and file names that will sort and search chronologically.
    Do you Twango?
    TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
    I've written an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.

  • I wonder how pro photographers use aperture?I shoot raw and my harddrive is alreay full.I'm not able to import new pictures.Is it ok if i create a vault and delete all my projects in the HD.Can I use an external HD use aperture through the vault??

    I wonder how pro photographers use aperture?I shoot raw and my harddrive is alreay full.I'm not able to import new pictures. I don't know what to do. I created a vault. My plan was to create a vault(put all my master files into an external harddrive) and then delete all my projects in my mac pro's harddrive. Is it the correct way to do it ? What should I do if I have thousands of raw files ? How should my workflow be? Can I use an external HD and use aperture through the vault,without keeping the master files on my computer's hard drive?? Or should I shoot raw+jpeg and store raw files in an external backup harddrive and import only jpegs into my aperture library?

    There's a bit to learn.  It will slowly make sense.
    Aperture is an empty field.  You're given a tractor and a whole bunch of attachments. What you grow, how, and where, is entirely up to you.
    Vaults are for back-up and only for back-up.  They have nothing to do with storing your working files.
    When your Library outgrows your system drive (and for good performance, you should leave c. 20% of every drive empty), it's time to convert some of your image's Masters from Managed to Referenced.  ("Managed" and "Referenced" refer to Masters, not to Libraries.)
    There are hundreds of posts in the forum, and several pages in the User Manual on using Masters.
    Many people run Aperture with the Library on their system disk, and most (or all) of their images' Masters on external FW drives.  This is a good set-up.  Note that you will likely have to take steps to back-up the data on your external drives.
    If you do the above, there should be no reason to delete any Projects.
    The choice of RAW or RAW+JPEG or JPEG depends on the kind of work you are doing.  I capture RAW only -- but I don't do any commercial shoots.  Pros on deadlines report that the RAW+JPEG works well for them.  Capture JPEG if it saves you time.  IMHO, there is not a good reason to shoot JPEG to save space (space is cheap; time expensive).
    Short-term solution: buy and use a FW800 external 1 TB drive, formatted "Mac OS Extended (Journaled)", and using Aperture relocate the Masters of all images older than 30 days to that drive.  (Be sure to change your back-up strategy to include this new drive; you may need a second new drive.)
    This general post of mine might help you understand more about Aperture.

  • Aperture and shooting Raw+Jpeg

    In camera Jpeg processing becomes better and better with each generation of cameras. One example is the dynamic range optimizer in my Sony A700. You often have a hard time to get similar results from the Raw. So for quite a lot of shots - especially the not so important ones - using just the Jpegs is a real time saver. Still it is good to have the Raw handy in case the camera processing went in the wrong direction, which still happens occasionally. With 8 or 16 GB cards it is not an issue meanwhile to shoot Raw+Jpeg. Unfortunately IMO there is no smooth Raw+Jpeg workflow within Aperture. Especially it is almost impossible to delete the Raw without loosing the Jpeg and vice versa in a managed library (see thread mentioned below).
    Thus I just posted this to www.apple.com/feedback. If you think this is an important issue, that should be added in a future version of Aperture, you might sent your feedback as well:
    It is nice, that Aperture already imports both pictures, if you shoot in Raw+Jpeg mode. But the further workflow of dealing with the Raw+Jpeg combo is not optimal:
    The main reason to shoot Raw + Jpeg is, to save time in using the ready processed Jpegs for the less important shots or the ones, where the in-camera processing left not much to improve, but still having the safety-net of the Raw for a more advanced development, in case the picture asks for it.
    So instead of showing the Raws and hiding the Jpegs by default it should be vice versa. If there is a Jpeg accompanying the Raw, the Jpeg should be displayed and the Raw should be hidden. At least you should be able to set in the preferences, whether you prefer to see the Raw or the Jpeg. If you realize while rating the picture or doing adjustments, that the Jpeg doesn't fit the bill, you should be able to give precedence to the Raw, aka showing the Raw and hiding the Jpeg.
    After having finished the work, you should be able to either delete or archive the not used version (either Raw or Jpeg), without loosing any metadata or adjustments already applied to the other version.
    Currently it is an extremely complex task, to get rid of the unused version. Workarounds are suggested in this thread: http://www.oreillynet.com/digitalmedia/blog/2007/09/gettingrid_of_unwanted_manage1.html
    Peter

    SierraDragon wrote:
    I am unfamiliar with Sony DSLRs and do not know what might make a Sony JPEG visually equal to a Sony RAW image file.
    What I refer to is the dynamic range optimizer, which is based on Apical’s IRIDIX image processing engine. I think it is used in recent Nikons as well, but as I have only a Sony DSLR I mentioned this.
    Basically it is a kind of highlights and shadows adjustment, but it works very well and in many cases you have a hard time to generate similar good results with your RAW processor (aka. Aperture).
    However, JPEG is still a lossy image format that IMO should only be used for low end usages. RAW converted by the camera vendor's software to non-lossy formats like TIFF should generally be quite superior to JPEG.
    Of cause the RAW holds more information and carefully processed often leads to better results than the in-camera JPEGs. But not every picture will be printed in poster size. And although JPEG is a lossy format, with a low compression setting the artifacts are almost undetectable at least with my DSLR.
    Shooting in RAW+Jpeg mode can be a real timesaver. You look at the Jpegs firsthand, rate them, make small adjustments, if neccessary. For the majority of the pictures you can use these Jpegs even for slideshows and prints. If you step over a picture, where the in-camera processing went wrong, like oversharpened, oversaturated picture with wrong WB etc., you can easily resort to the accompanying RAW and process it to your heart's content. The only drawback with this workflow is the increased temporary storage capacitiy you need. But with today's low memory card prices, the benefits outweigh the cost by far IMHO.
    That said, the reason for my post was not to discuss the benefits of a RAW+Jpeg workflow, but Aperture's issues in dealing with it.
    Peter

  • Does Aperture work on my RAW or JPEG files?

    When using Aperture only one image appears, although both RAW and JPEG are stored originally.  What am I actually editing, RAW or JPEG?  How can I tell what is happening?
    Thanks

    Hello, that depends on how you imported your RAW-jpeg pairs.
    With the above setting the RAW will be used, with "jpeg as master" the jpeg.
    To change your setting after import, see this post:
    Re: How do I work on my raw files and not the jpeg files that currently dis
    May 8, 2010 5:48 PM
    Regards
    Léonie

  • Comparing RAW vs. jpg in Aperture When Shooting RAW + jpg

    I just started shooting RAW + jpg with a brand new camera. I imported these photos into Aperture. The photos all have jpg as the master with the associated Badge indicating there is also a RAW version. Changing each Badge, I can toggle between the jpg and the RAW versions.
    However, I would like to compare both versions (side by side). If I don’t like the jpeg version, I’ll post process using the RAW version. How can I do this in Aperture? Ideally, I would like to have these respective RAW and jpg versions of each photo in a single Stack to facilitate comparison.

    Sven Erik wrote:
    Excellent! However, do you know I can create separate masters after I've already imported?
    You can do this either one at a time or in multiple selection:
    1 - Select image(s) you want to see both JPEG and RAW masters for (let's say you have the JPEG set as master by default).
    2 - Photos menu > Set RAW as Master (this switches JPEG master to RAW master)
    3 - With image(s) still selected: 'Photos menu > New version from master'
    4 - You now have two RAW versions of each image (the original master version and a new version)
    5 - Select all original versions and then: 'Photos menu > Set JPEG as Master'
    6 - You should now have a JPEG master and a RAW version of each image (the same as having a JPEG and RAW master side by side). The only difference is that the RAW will have '-version #' after the image name.
    7 - You can run a batch change via 'Metadata menu > Batch change...' and use the Version Name Format drop-down / Edit function to change the name on the new masters (I sometimes use the 'Master File Name' and remove all other items from the format field, which leaves the same master name and the file extension).
    I use the 'Both (JPEG as Master)' in Tony's screenshot and then just create a RAW version if the JPEG does not meet my needs for some reason.

  • Work flow RAW - JPG conversion question

    I am still not only working on Aperture's features but learning also the best way to manage a work flow with it. So, here's what I want to do.
    #1 - I have an external drive coming so I don't have to store all my pictures (many of them now RAW)on my Macbook Pro's internal hard drive. I really don't need the RAW files anymore that I have used to create the final versions, which Aperture now stores as either TIFF or PSD files. I really just need to have my final versions stored now as JPG files now that I am done editing. Do I just export the files I want from my MacBook Pro onto the new hard drive as JPGs, then re-import them into Aperture as another project/folder?
    #2 - When I import new RAW images from my camera, edit them and have completed the project, many times I just want to save the final versions as JPGs and discard the RAW files. Is there an easy way to do this within Aperture versus exporting them, deleting the original files, and re-importing as JPGs as new project?
    Thanks.
    Matt

    Steve:
    That may be a good point. I will need to calc it out. My new drive coming in is a 750 Gig 800-Firewire drive.
    I have currently a 320gig drive on a server that I use only for pictures. Shooting JPG, it was about half full for about 6 months of shooting. When I started shooting RAW in the last month, the drive is now almost full. I have 12 Gig left on it.
    I do weddings, model shoots, portraits, event documentations...lots of stuff so I take a LOT of pictures. I really don't keep everything (blurry shots, half-closed eyes on subjects, etc), but I do keep a lot.
    My work: http://www.mattclinephotography.com and http://www.flickr.com/photos/kb8wfh
    I may just try it with keeping the RAW files there and see how it does with file storage. Backup of files that large in quantities that large is going to be another question all together. Looks like I need a big job so I can buy a DROBO.

  • Anybody got a better work flow for backing up multiple shoot day projects?

    Many of my projects are shot over multiple days. I import media at the end of each day and back up the event to another drive before deleting media from cameras/cards. So on day 2 I have one of three work flows for updating my back-ups.
    1. If I'm feeling lucky. I delete the previous back-up project from the back-up drive. And then make a new copy of the original event and add the date to the title after the word copy.
    2. I make a new copy of the event to the backup drive and date it. When it's done copying and been verified I delete the back-up event from the same back-up drive.
    3. I've just started copying new clips from the original media folder in the original event to the back-up project. It's more work keeping track of all the newly added media files and there is more chance of making an ommision.
    Anybody got a better work flow for backing up multiple shoot day projects?

    What you need:
    You will need two identical external drives and a copy of Carbon Copy Cloner. CCC is free. The drives could be USB 2 if all you are doing is backing up. If you plan on editing with the drive(s), you'll want firewire. Each needs to be large enough to contain the raw card contents for the duration of your gig.
    The Process:
    At the end of the first day's recording, connect the two drives to your computer (if firewire, daisy chain them / if USB, you'll need two USB 2.0 ports)
    On the first hard drive (Drive 1) create a folder - call it BigDealLecture
    Inside of BigDealLecture, create a folder and use the nameing convention  "BDL_Date_card number for that day" - so if you used 2 cards today, you should create BDL_2012-02-15_01 and BDL_2012-02-15_02
    Attach your card reader or camera to the system.
    Lock the cards so they can not be erased
    Insert Card 1 into the reader
    Select ALL contents of the card and copy them to the folder you created for the first card for today
    When it is complete, eject the card, insert card 2, copy its contents to the folder for card 2
    eject the card
    Launch CCC and do a clone of Drive 1 to Drive 2. You can set it to do a complete block by block clone or an incremental backup. Either will work.
    When finished cloning, test a random sample of the clips on both drives to make sure they work.
    When satisfied the copies work, put Drive 2 in the hotel safe.
    Put the Drive 1 in a place where you can grab it if there is an emergency in the night and erase the cards to get ready for the next day.
    Take Drive 1 with you to the lecture site the next day.
    Rinse and repeat daily.
    When the conference is over, send one of the drives via FedEx or some other same day service to your office. Pack the second drive in your bags for the trip home.
    A note: If you have enough downtime durning the conference between obligations, you can do the transfer from the cards to Drive 1 on site and do the clone when you get back to your room. Don't unlock and erase the cards until you are satisfied the copy/clone process was without incident.
    Have fun.
    x

  • Zoom in-out and rotation in trackpad doesn't work in iPhoto and Aperture. Any solution?

    Zoom in-out and rotation in trackpad doesn't work in iPhoto and Aperture. Any solution?

    Sound like a trackpad problem and not an iPhoto one.  Have you asked in the forum dedicated to the Mac model you're using or is this an add on trackpad?
    OT

  • Hello! I'm using Aperture with Efex plugins and notice, what when I saving result in plugin and go back to aperture, preview mode is going to grey color and not working until I reboot Aperture. Did you saw this problem?

    Hello! I'm using Aperture with Efex plugins and notice, what when I saving result in plugin and go back to aperture, preview mode is going to grey color and not working until I reboot Aperture. What is intresting - in full screen mode everything works fine. Did you saw this problem?

    It seems there's a workaround here:
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5566037?tstart=0

  • Is it Possible to Delete a Work Flow in SAP

    Is it Possible to Delete a Work Flow  in SAP

    If you mean a work flow item (and not the template which you already got the solution to), then the best thing to do is logically delete it, also known as cancelling. You can do that from the work item view if you have sufficient authorization.
    Go to the technical view.
    Switch to edit mode.
    Observe the buttons that suddenly became available.
    If you don't see any buttons for "delete logically" (can't recall the exact text) you don't have sufficient authorization.
    2007-03-21 08:42 Message was edited by Kjetil Kilhavn:
    Ahhhh... the disadvantage of using the "Previous" link to navigate the list of questions. I didn't see you had posted a new thread. But then again, if you had "Done The Right Thing" and updated your first question instead....
    I suggest we share the blame on this one

  • Will be possible to extract data from work flow?

    hi
    i need to add approver in FIAP report. the filed is available not any table like, its getting from abap work flow? please let me know  normally will be possible to extract data from work flow?

    Hi,
    There is no direct method i am aware of, but you can definitely create custom extractors on base tables.
    -Vikram

Maybe you are looking for