Post Commitment Item & sponsor class to a group accounts

Hello,
In this area, Financial - Public Sector Magement - Funt Management
Some body knows if it's possible restrict the posting of the commitment Item and the
sponsor class to a group of accounts?
Thanks,

Hi Luis,
Can you emphasize more on your request? The document chain is this that FI document generates FM entry (except for earmarked funds), so what restrictment are you looking for? If you do not want certain CI used with certain G/Ls (assuming that you do not derive CI, but enter it manually, which is not common), you can always use validations (OB28).
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

Commitment item error

Sir,
While doing MIGO Goods Receipt following error coming related to Fund Managment :-
Posting not possible; incorrect financial transactions of the cmmt item     Message no. FI149
Diagnosis
     You want to post a goods receipt. However, this is not possible because
     commitment items that have a financial transaction larger than 40 are
     included in the posting.
Procedure
     See to it that your system administrator or consultants check the
     commitment item assignments to the G/L accounts.
     If you want to post a goods receipt, the only G/L accounts that can be
     included are those with a financial transaction smaller than or equal to
     40.
Kindly help

Hi,
You must take care that the commitment item which is assigned to the G/L relevant for MIGO is defined with 30 (or 40)/3 financial/item category. You can verify the financial transaction via FMCIA. You can define the commitment item which is supposed to be derived either in the G/L master data or with FMDERIVE functionality.
Regards,
Eli

GL Account and Commitment Items Integration

Hi Consultants,
Please explain the GL account and commitment items relationship. I know i can assign a commitment item to N number of GL accounts.
But can i assign many commitment items to one GL account?
Thank you.
Ekemini

Dear FM Expert,
I 'm new in the forum. I have some problem related to fmderive too. I have to do as your scenario that is to derive stat committment item to depreciation expense account. I use fmderive with user exit EXIT_SAPLFMDT_001 and include ZXFMDTU01
Coding to check AFAB tcode to derive the committment item. It's not work
if sy-tcode+0(4) = 'AFAB'.
    if I_FMDERIVE_SOURCE-account_number = 'xxx'.
      e_fmderive_target-commit_item = 'xxx'.
    endif.
ENDIF.
When I set trace , It seems work when test run for AFAB but when I do production run that need run in background. It does not work. Is there anything wrong with my code or Does fmderive work with Background job
Is there any suggesttion , please ?
Thank you very much,
one

Commitment item in MIGO for component check

Hi All,
In the current project FM has been implemented. When I am doing GI in Migo and ehen component item check for ok, I am getting error Commmitment item entered in item 00000. How to do the GI.

Fi consultant should define commitment item and budget for the Gl Account.

Funds Management - Commitment items for all GLs

Hello -
When we activate Funds Management, System expects a commitment item for every GL, including Bank accounts and Inventory accounts. I want system to expect commitment item only for expense accounts. How can I Do it. As such, we donu2019t have a budget for bank accounts.
Thanks in advance.
Chris
Edited by: Chris Farr on Nov 24, 2008 12:14 PM

Just read Eli's msg clearly, its mentioned that GLs have to be assigned to Commitment with right category and Fin transacton. Just explored the IDES FM areas 1000,3000 and 4000 and understood the following but with couple of questions ( mentioned below)
Expenditure     30/3
Asset exp                     30/3
GR/IR - Clearing     40/3
Misc clearing      40/3
Liquid funds / Bank a/cs     90/1
All other bank chk pable/ Recbles     80/3
Trade recble     60/2     it make sense, but in FM area 3000, Receivables defined as 30/3 ?
Trade payable     60/3     it make sense, but in FM area 3000, Receivables defined as 30/3 ?
Tax payable     30/2     Why category '2' here?
Input tax                     30/2     Why category '2' here?
WOULD APPRECIATE IF SOMEBODY CAN CLARIFY MY QUESTIONS ABOVE.
Hope this info is useful and not mis guiding
Thanks
Chris

BADI me51n : commitment item chanes in me51n by user

Hi gurus,
i have a requirement that user will maintain commitment item in Ztable w.r.t item categeory 'U'.
if the same commitment item is not displayed in the account assignment tab then it should throw a error.
i used method IF_EX_ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST~PROCESS_ITEM to do it and is throwing the relevant error.
But when user is entering the correct commitment as maintained in ztable i need to jump the error which i am not getting how to do since i am getting the commitmnet item from SKB1 table .
how to get the values of commitment item when user is entering the correct one ??

Before using macro mmpur_message_forced to raise the error, did you pass the metafield identifier thru macro mmpur_metafield (from type pool MMMFD it should be mmmfd_commit_item)
Regards,
Raymond

Updating group account number into BSEG

Hello experts,
our client is currently implementing a group chart of account - going live during the fiscal year. Is there a possibilty to update the records already posted in BSEG (FAGLFLEXA) with the new group account number? Is there an approach in standard SAP?
Regards
Maria

Thanks a lot Atif,
but with the settings in FB00 I cannot add the Group account number into Entry view nor in General ledger view. Right?
I'm looking for the solution that will add BSEG-ALTKTinto those two view.
Thanks, Filip

"Item category 01001 not allowed in accounting trantransaction 0000/0001"

Hi,
I am facing an error of FI- HR integration in Payroll Posting Document "Item category 01001 not allowed in accounting transaction 0000/0001" while doing indirect posting of HR-FI document.
The Business Area Clearing Account we are using 10800690 - Item category 01001 and accounting transaction 0000/0001.
Error Message No. GLT2001.
Can anybody help me how this error can be removed.
We are mainly want to split the profit center assigned in cost center into two profit center with 50:50 ratio.
Regards
Rahkes

Hi
Your error is due to your assignment of GL Accounts. When you post a billing document through VF01, the system assumes that a revenue a/c will be effected. Now, in your assignment of item category to GL Account, you have assigned the item category Materials (06000) to your Revenue GL Account. This is maintained in Config:
IMG>Financial Accounting (New)> General Ledger Accounting (New)> Business Transactions>Document Splitting>Classify GL Accounts for Document Splitting
However, for Accounting Document Type RV (Generally used for SD generated accounting document for Billing ), you would have assigned the Business Transaction for Invoice (200). However, in this as per standard design, there is no posting allowed for material account
IMG>Financial Accounting (New)> General Ledger Accounting (New)> Business Transactions>Document Splitting>Extended Document Splitting>Define Document Splitting Rule
Based on your splitting rule used, you can check the config here.
To resolve the error you have two options:
1. Change the assignment of Item Category to GL Account in the path to revenue
IMG>Financial Accounting (New)> General Ledger Accounting (New)> Business Transactions>Document Splitting>Classify GL Accounts for Document Splitting
However, you must be careful, if any data has been posted, as changing this config leads to data inconsistency at account assignment level
2. Define a new splitting rule with item category 06000 allowed for posting to material account allowed by copying the existing rule and assigning this to Document Type RV in the path
IMG>Financial Accounting (New)> General Ledger Accounting (New)> Business Transactions>Document Splitting>Classify Document Types for Document Splitting
Thanks & Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Table to validate Commitment Item Group....

Hi all,
I am using tcode: gmclass. What is the table to validate field 'Commitment Item Group' -> fipex_grp?
Appreciate your help.
Thanks.
Regards,
Fred.

Program is using the followint tables
TABLES: t777o,
        objec.
TABLES: gmspclass,       " structure Sponsored Class
        gmspprogram,     " structure Sponsored Program
        gmspresponsible, " Responsible for Program
        gmauthgrp,       " Authorization Groups
        gmauthgrpt.      " authorization groups texts
TABLES: igmspclass,      " Screen fields for class
        igmspprogram.    " Screen fields for program
also check
GMFGC                          Field group criteria (Grants)
GMFGC_1                        Field group criteria (Grants) system+user
Go to SE11 and search Gm*
Hope thisll give you idea!!
<b>P.S award the points.</b>
Good luck
Thanks
Saquib Khan
"Knowledge comes but wisdom lingers!!"

Commitment Item-Error while posting GR

Hi MM Gurus
I am tryin to post GR without PO for movement type 101.
and already customized settings for Auto PO allowed for movement type 101.
When i m tryin to save GR, it is showin me error
" No Commitment Item Entered in item 00010 1000 379999"
i dont knw how to solve this error..
Error description Says, someone has activated funds management, cash budget management, or project cash management, therefore i must have to enter commitment item in all involved company code.
so culd u pls let me knw whr exactly i have to enter this details for commitment item.
Thanks a lot..
Regards
Jignesh

Hi,
This is due to lack of budget against the concerned item. Check the same against the commitment item as per the valuation class assigned for the item.This can be viewed in TCode FMRP_2FMB4002 .Ask your FI team for allocation of budget.
Dhruba

Error in Posting Service Entry Sheet - FI 311 No Commitment Item in Item 1

Dear All,
We need a suggestion/solution for the following problem :-
Our customer had raised purchase orders for services in may 2010. The following critical entries were made in the purchase order.
Account Assignment Category was P-Project
The WBS element was entered as the Accounts Assigment Category was P.
The user was entering uncoded services. Hence the material group for that service which had G/L a/c tagged to it was entered. But the G/l code was not populated in the purchase order by the system at that time of creation of purchase order and subsequently the user was able to save and release purchase order.
The user was able to post Service Entry Sheet and generate accounting entries in june 2010.
Additional service entry sheets are required to be posted for the remaining quantites. The client has urcated the SES process into two parts.
1. Through T-code ZML81N the end user is able to create and save the SES.
2. Through T-code ML81N the Head of Department is able to approve and post the SES which results in generating of accounting entries.
Presently the user is able to create SES with tcode ZML81N. But when the HOD tries to approve and post the ses we get the error.
FI 311 - No commitement item maintained in Item 0001 in P220 (company code).
Fund Management is active in this company code and all settings related to Funds Management and FI have been checked by respective consultants.
The end user is not having any problems in processing SES for current Pos. But he is not able to create SES for the POs created in May, 2010 for which the user has already created and posted more than one SES against the same POs.
We have already escalated it to SAP.
Thanks in advance
Anil Shanbhag

Hi,
Use T.code:FS00 and check G/L account 280000 is there in your company code or not.
If yes, check its nature(type/description,control data , cretae bank/intererst tabs)of G/L
NOTE: Also check and compare the field selection between Movement type 101 & your G/L account 280000 in SE38 t.code with Program RM07CUFA
Regards,
Biju

Commitment item not picking while MIRO posting for Service entry sheet

Hi to all,
We have activated Fund Management in middle of the year where there were purchase order completed to till MIGO. When we do MIRO now system unable to pick commitment item from FMDERIVE.
We have created Commitment item as 50/3 combination ( No budget check ) and assigned to GR/IR clearing account.
We also activated trace in FMDERIVE and checked MIRO posting and found that derivation is working properly but while posting it is triggering error.
Some one advise me as it affected daily activities.
Thanks & Regards,
Y.Kiran Babu

Hi,
For the purchase order completed and the related MIGO created before FM was implemented, you need to run FMCN and FMCT.
I will explain to you in detail all the information related to the matter.
First of all, it seems to be in your PO that does not have FM account assignment (funds center and commitment item) in account assignment TAB. In addition, the error occurs usually also because in your SES the FM account assignment is missing.
For GR and IR documents FM always takes the major part of the FM account assignment from the PO.
You can fill these account assignments by using the programs RFFMCHAN/RFFMCHAT.
FMCN/FMCT must be run for the first document in the chain, which is the PO in case you don't have a PR assigned to this PO or an earmarked fund document. If you have PR's assigned to the PO's please run FMCN/FMCT for the PR first.
When executing the FMCT transaction, ALL documents selected in one group must be tested and processed successfully TOGETHER. If any one document fails, the ENTIRE group is shown as in error.
Therefore, first step is to ensure that the reference PO has a valid FM account assignment and is updated in FM. This should be done by FMCN/FMCT and subsequent posting with FMN4N (see reconstruction note 189761).
The SES itself might not be changed by FMCT. Therefore you should fulfill the FM account assignments in SES manually or with a custom program.
Please check also your table FM01X. As an alternative solution, you can enable one of these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
You can find more information about it in text part of notes 1146677 and 923672.
FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672. This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines. Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are not incorrectly derived.
Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the following programs:
1) FMN0 for this PO/GR to see if the actual values are correct in FM table FMIFIIT (FM actual line items).
2) Run report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF). The reconstruction programs always update the totals records in Funds Management. Therefore, you do not normally need to reconstruct the totals records. However, if you suspect there are data inconsistencies in the totals records, you can analyze and correct these using the report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF).
If you correct the totals records, you must do this before you reconstruct the assigned values (see below).
3) Run reconstruction for AVC
You can also reconstruct the assigned values using the following tools:
    o Report BPINDX03 (transaction FMBV) for former budgeting
    o Report RFFMAVC_REINIT (transaction FMAVCREINIT) for the Budget
       Control System (BCS)
Make sure that no other system activities (postings, budgeting) are carried out during a reconstruction (commitment/actual or assigned values).
I believe that this resolve your inquiry.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

How to Change financial trasnactin for commitment item for which no trasnaction has been posted

Hi ,
1.
\We re in process to Go live for he FUND Management module for Power generation business, while we create all FM master data and budget structure we found a mistake in NONBUDGET commitment items. we wrongly mapped financial transaction 30, while changing it to 40 system showing following massage,
Field "Fin.transaction" cannot be changed
    Message no. F6288
Diagnosis
    You can no longer change the entry in field Fin.transaction as commitment
    item NONBUDGET in FM area SAPL and fiscal year has already been defined
    as a budget object.
System Response
    Field Fin.transaction is not changed.
2. when we try to delete the commitment item system showing following error
Commitment item NONBUDGET in FM area and Fyear SAPL defined as a budget
object
    Message no. F6206
Diagnosis
    The commitment item NONBUDGET in the FM area SAPL and fiscal year was
    defined as a budget object.
System Response
    The chosen action was not executed.
Procedure
    Remove the indentification Budget object in the budget structure.
As per above error we check the following details
1. FM deriver - Removed NONBUDGET from all the rule
2. There is no Budget/ Posting in FM9k
3. There is no activation of budget ( no golive)
4 There is no data posted with the commitment Items

Hi Jeetendra
Try deleting the budget structure using FMBSBO_DEL.
Thanks
Shyam

How update Fund Center and Commitment Item after posting

hi Experts,
Funds management was activated during the year and hence there are few open items saved without capturing Fund Center and Commitment Item. When i tried to clear these open item i get the following error
Line in document xxx xxxxxxxxxxxx does not contain any commitment items
Is there any program which i can use to update derivation to the already posted line item
Thanks in Advance

Hi,
Solutions proposed by Alexey are good if FM document was created for the FI documents in question. If, however, no FM document was created, reassignment process won't help. You can try FMN0 transaction after creating a derivation rule in FMDERIVE for these documents, but I cannot confirm that it would be sucessful as FMN0 transaction is not perfect.
The solution could be updating FI tables (BSEG/BSIS/BSAS) with FM assignment (fund centre/commitment item) and only then running FMN0 transaction. In this case, FM document will be created and you'll be able to process the items.
Regards,
Eli

Table for Commitment Item Groups

Does smbd. know a table for Commitment Item Groups and probably a function module which reads a commitment item group from a commitment item ?
Kind Regards
Alexey

You can use FM K_HIERARCHY_TABLES_READ with e_class = '0311'.
Rob

Post Commitment Item & sponsor class to a group accounts

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for