Post Disk Restore Issues

I have restored my disk from a backup after the previous one failed.
Now when I open iWeb the series of pages on the left hand side are all red as if they haven't been updated.
The fact of the matter is, if I send this off to publish it will remove some of the comments that have been put on the site since. So I tried using the "Check For New Comments" in the file menu. But it doesn't seem to be updating anything.
What is the solution here? How do I get my site back up to date without loosing any data?

As it's been four days, I suggest you try MobileMe live chat support which is now 24/7 — see this announcement.

Similar Messages

  • HP Stream 13 - Disk Space Issue

    I've had this laptop for about 2 months now. I just decided I wanted to take advantage of the one year subscription of Office 365. However, every time I try to download it it says that the disk is full. I don't have ANY files on this laptop nor do I have that many apps. I do have skype, itunes, and a few other things downloaded but that is about it. I don't know what else I'm supposed to do considering I already don't have much on here. I'm not even able to view pictures on my Dropbox  because of the space issue or even use skype at times because "the disk is full".

    Hi @Michelle_le,
    Welcome to the HP Forums!
    It is a terrific place to find answers and  information!
    For you to have the best experience in the HP forum I would like to direct your attention to the HP Forums Guide Learn How to Post and More
    You stated you have the Stream 13 notebook but did not provide the exact model.
    How Do I Find My Model Number or Product Number?
    I understand that when you tried to advantage of the one year subscription to Office  365 you received the message that the disk was full.
    If you openThis PC  how much free space is showing on the drive?
    When you are trying to download the software where is it saving the file?
    If this has not helped, as it is only 2 months old, I suggest contacting HP support for assistance.  They can remotely access your system to help determine and overcome difficulties.
    Please call our technical support at 800 474 6836. If you live outside the US/Canada Region, please click the link below to get a support number for your region.
    World Wide Phone Support
    Good Luck!
    Sparkles1
    I work on behalf of HP
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the bottom right to say “Thanks” for helping!

  • Tivoli/TSAFS.NLM Restore issue

    I am trying to restore a server using Tivoli and Storserver on the front end. I keep getting errors( server detecting system error). Storserver/Tivoli said this is a TSAFS.NLM error. I see a Novell TID dated Oct/05 that eludes to this problem( 10099433). The fix does not work. Tivoli is suggesting that this is a known issue with Novell and a fixed TSAFS.NLM should fix the problem. Our current date/version TSAFS.NLM is Aug 14, 2007/6.52.08.
    Do we need to update/ back rev this NLM, or is there a specific fix?
    Thank you,
    Pete

    Originally Posted by ataubman
    You don't say specifically: is it the issue in the TID of not backing up files that have square brackets [] in them? Or a more general problem? You mention getting errors whereas that TID says there are no errors registered, the files with [] just don't back up. So it seems to me likely that TID does not in fact relate to your problem at all.
    Also you say the fix in teh TID did not work. What exactly from the TID did you do?
    START:
    Here is an update of what we did that helped much, but we are still getting errors. This was my e-mail to Novell support:
    This is in regards to our Tivoli/Storserve restore issues....
    We did as you said as to TID 10089094 and TID 1009433 reloading the NLM
    TSAFS with the switch:
    /NoConvertUnmappableChrs
    This DID help as we were able to restore much more with fewer errors. But we are still getting the errors I explained to you in the original call on many
    files.
    I ran a restore against two known files that give us these errors from
    the original backup dated March 27. I have attached the DEBUG TSAFS log
    as per TID 10097645.
    END of e-mail to Novell support...But they have escalated to next level as we are still getting SOME errors of the same....I will update this thread as I get more...
    NOTE: Intrestingly, we had to restore a second server. Using this switch from the start, we did NOT get any errors...
    Stand by/
    Pete

  • Issue while posting using goods issue for delivery type NL

    Hello Experts,
    I have created an outbound delivery for an intra-company transfer (within same company code) between two plants. The delivery type in NL (replinishment delivery)
    When i am trying to post the goods issue from supplying plant, I am getting following error
    "Account type K is not defined for document type WL".
    Delivery type NL should not be used to issue stock to vendor but I am not issuing it to any external vendor , issuing the stokc only to a receiving plant.
    Please help to understand why i am getting this error.
    Regards,
    Nish.

    Hi,
    If you are doing an STO Scenario, Check whether you have created the supplying plant as a vendor.
    The Vendor Account group should be plants.
    Also check whether you have given the plant in the vendor master Purchasing Data - Extras tab in the menu click on add purchasing data & check.
    If you haven't assigned this, do the same & create a fresh STO & check.
    Hope it will work.
    Thanks & Regards,

  • Posting multiple goods issues against the same delivery

    Hello gurus,
    We are a fashion apparel company using ECC 6.0 and would like to know if it is possible to post mutliple goods issues against the same delivery?
    I will explain the business requirement.
    - We create a stock transport order to deliver 400 units of merchandise to on or our retail stores (STO is created and processed to a delivery).
    - This information is passed down to our warehouse management system (which is not SAP)
    - Our warehouse management system has the ability to split a delivery into multiple shipment when needed.  For example, our warehouse may only be able to complete 250 units for our morning shipment and will therefore pick, pack and post this.  This will feed back into SAP and process a 641 movement so that the units now show as "in transit".  This is needed so that our stores can process the ASN and move the units into their inventory when they receive the merchandise later that day.
    - During the afternoon, our warehouse will process the remaining 150 units and will ship this to our store later in the evening or next day.
    Currently, we are not able to process another goods issue against a delivery as we close out the delivery during the first goods issue.  We would prefer not to have to generate a new delivery for our DC and let them continue to process against the same delivery, but we are unsure how to configure this.
    Any help or guideance would be extremely appreciated
    Thanks in advance

    Hi RJ,
    First of all sorry to write such a lengthy reply,In one line if i want to summerize then it is not possible with standard SAP however we can achieve this by writing some piece of code in both the system
    AS - IS
                   Business process
              From business process point of view you are right that once the pick & pack is in process it is not advisable to create a new delivery document for balance quantity and share the same with WMS as then they have to create a new document in WMS and start picking based on that rather then the old delivery document number. if i am in your position then i can give a thought like this
    e.g.
    Delivery                                                  - 100 Unit
    Shipment confirmation from WMS            -   60 Unit
    Change in delievry quanity / Pick qty        -   60 Unit
    Invoice from SAP                                    -   60 Unit
    Second confirmation from WMS                          -   40  Unit
    Change in the existing delivery quantity                -   Now here we have two option either
    1) Change the delivery quantity / Pick qty  to (60+40) =100 or
    2) Remove the 60 and update 40 as delivery and pick quantity
    Pros & Cons
    if you will select option 1 then furhter invoice will happen for 100 unit which is incorrect as physically you are shipping only 40 unit
    if you are selecting option 2 then the document flow is incorrect as you don't have history(in SAP) for the 60 unit which was shipped earlier
    Solution ::
    so in my opinion the best option is to create a seperate delivery document (store the old delviery number in one of the field of the new delivery and pass the same to custom segment of the IDoc) transmit the IDoc to WMS write the validation logic in WMS
    Find the record with old deliver number in the WMS system, check the status whether it is active or inactive
    if it is acitive Validate the Material + qty with the WMS record(Material + balance quantity) if both are same then pass the new deliery number to custom field of the WMS table
    At the time of confirming back to the SAP, Write a piece of code in SAP that if the incoming idoc custom field(new delivery number) field is populated then ignore the orignal document number and post the document using the new delivery document number
    Hope this help

  • BAPI to post a Goods issue with relation to Sales Order?

    Hi Everyone,
    After creating a delivery order, I need a BAPI to automatically post a goods issue for this DO.
    I tried using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE but it returns the message 'Goods Movement not possible with mvmt type 601'.
    Any advice?
    Best Regards,
    Junwen

    Hi John,
    My data are as follows:
    GOODSMVT HEADER:
    PSTNG_DATE: 30.09.2004
    DOC_DATE: 30.09.2004
    REF_DOC_NO: had tried 1014000359 or empty
    GOODSMVT_CODE: 03
    GOODSMVT_ITEM:
    MATERIAL: HP0121002
    PLAN: 1010
    STGE: 10FG
    BATCH: BATCH1
    MOV: 601
    CUSTOMER: 180017
    ENTRY_QNT: 1
    ENT_UOM: PC
    ENT_UOM_ISO: PC
    DELIV_NUMB: 1014000359
    DELIV_ITEM: 000001
    From your feedback, it is possible to use the BAPI to create a goods issue for movement type 601?
    Best Regards,
    Junwen

  • Post a good issue against an outbound delivery with movement type 601 K

    Hello,
    according to my business scenario I need to manage the stock of different vendors into the client's location (plant) at storage location level and I need to post the good issue against an outbound delivery to decrease the stock level.
    Since the owner of the goods isn't my client the item is managed only at quantity level (not value) so I'm not interesed in the accounting document.
    To do it I'm using the functionality related to the vendor consignment stock but I'm not able to post the good issue against an outbound delivery using the movemement type 601 and the special stock indicator equal to K.
    In particular I've tried in two different ways:
    - setup the consignment stock indicator (= K) into the sales item category, but when I post the goods issue the system is not able to find out the right vendor
    - to create a stock determination rule instead of the setting previous described, but the system display an error message (Fld selectn for mvmt type 601 / acct L534200770 differs for Cost center (010) ) even if the accouting is not relevant in my scenario
    Can you suggest me how the system has to be setup in order to cover my requirements?
    Thanks in advance,
    Alessandro

    Hi,
    Please clarrify which material type you are using in this scenario? I suggest you to use material type UNBW (no value updation will be there) and create a material master.  Use special stock indicator K. Proceed with 601K to do GI. Hope it works. Thanking you.

  • Error when posting an goods issue of movement type 501: order not contain

    I tried to post an goods issue of movment type 501 to a stock transport order. But I get the error as below.
    Document 4500000130 does not contain any selectable items
    Message no. M7 064
    Diagnosis
    The document or item entered cannot be adopted.
    Possible reasons for this are:
    The document items have already been processed
    (Suggest zero lines indicator set?).
    the document items have been deleted or are blocked.
    the document items have been created for a different plant.
    (for reservations only) movements are not yet allowed for the reservation items.
    (for reservations only) the document items are retrograde components of the order. These are posted using the order confirmations.
    The document is an R/2 document.
    Procedure
    Make sure your entries are correct.
    If the system has already processed the total quantity, you can set the Suggest zero lines indicator. The system will suggest the quantity zero for the items that have already been processed.
    If you have entered a particular item, cancel the item. If you do not enter an item, the system searches all of the open items in the document.
    If the document is a purchase order, production order or a reservation, you can enter search criteria in the dialog box.
    You access the dialog box by choosing the menu option Enter with reference on the initial screen.
    If the document is an R/2 document, you have to cancel it manually by entering the reversal movement type.
    How can I proceed to post?
    Thanks,
    Eda

    Hi
    Go to T.code MB1A, enter the required movement type, Plant and storage location and then click,
    The push button of  Reservation on the tool bar for refereing the reservation or
    The push button of  order  on the tool bar for refereing the Production order.
    Cheers
    Kris

  • How to get material's last posting date of issuing to production order?

    Hi,
    In my scenario, I need to get material's last posting date of issuing to production order (e.g. mov. typ. 261).
    I tried to select the material documents whose movement type is 261, and restrict the posting date from month to month each time, until the first material document is selected.
    But this method seems quite inefficient.
    What kind of algorithm is more effient to do this?
    Thanks
    Wesley

    Hi,
    select max( budat )
      from mkpf
      into gv_budat
      where mblnr in ( select mblnr
                         from aufm
                        where aufnr = gv_aufnr "(Prod. Order)
                            and  matnr = gv_matnr "(Issued Material)
                            and bwart = '261' ).
    Edited by: Azeem Ahmed Matte on Mar 12, 2010 12:33 PM

  • Error in posting a goods issue

    Hi everyone,
    We're encountering an issue with posting. When trying to post a goods issue from a delivery via VL02N, an error message is displayed : "The document does not contain any item.". although it does contain items.
    Do you have an idea of why thie error would appear ?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hello,
    Can you check whether
    1. you have picked the item,if not then pick the material and goto Edit>Confirm pick order>All items, or
    2. activated warehouse management. if yes then you need to create a transfer order with reference to that delivery.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Priyanka

  • Posting a "goods issue" msg NR751

    Hi All,
    posting a goods issue, sap gives me the message NR751...
    But the number range has been created ...
    I can't post the goods issue
    Could anyone help me?
    thanks
    Gandalf

    Ciao Gandalf, ( e' sempre un piacere incontrare un fan del signore degli anelli)
    the error NR751 have 3 variables                                      
    -> For object &1 &2, number range interval &3 does not exist                                                                               
    Please, go to transaction SNRO and enter RF_BELEG (I suppose this is the object in the error) in the 'Object' field.     
    In the menu path press Go To -> Number Ranges.
    Enter the relevant  Company Code. Do you have an entry here for the interval &3?                                                                               
    Mauro

  • I'm having restore issues, help please!!!

    this has probably already been answered, but got new 8gb iphone today plugged it in etc it crashed tried to reboot and reconnect to itunes, told to restore tried failed error code 13 checked forum changed usb bingo it starts to restore, now though the progress bar on the phone is full but on itunes it's saying it's still waiting for iphone been like this for almost an hour can anyone help, i've not even made a phone call from it yet!
    Message was edited by: sscsukltd

    sorry... can't help, not having these "restore" issues (yet...) and I've done 4- Restore to Backup the past week and two "restore to new Phone" and no issues... other than the fact that with a "Restore to New Phone" my 3rd party data app's are not "recoverable" as with the "restore to backup"

  • Post a goods issue

    Hi Everyone,
    After creating a delivery order, I need a BAPI to automatically post a goods issue for this DO.
    I tried using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE . I haven't errors but the Goods issue has not been posted for the delivery.
    Any advice?
    Best Regards,
    Nadia

    One way is possible, but it has also negative aspects:
    You can set back the current period to a required period. There is a init repor in the customizing of MM. I would set the current one back to june, so you could post im may.
    After done this, the normal period report for setting the next month can be run.
    But: doing this, current values and the last period are at least the same. You loose one historical period....
    I would try this in a test system.
    Regards
    Uwe Werner

  • Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt m

    Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt  movement for the same material, into the same period?
    We try to explain better, today we've done a test:
    Step 1 :   We have created a material, wich material type is HAWA, with price control V, and 1 euro for 1 ST.
    Step 2 :   We have post a good receipt movement, 561 of this material  with 1000 ST of stock, and on posting date: 05.05.2011.
    Step 3 :   Then, we have post a good issue movement, 562 of the same material, with 500 ST of stock,  on posting date: 01.05.2011 ( so that, the posting date of the 562 is before from the posting date of 561).
    And it has worked, so that on trx "mb51" for this material we saw:
    PLANT1-----STO1---- 562-----  Mat. Doc.101.05.2011--
    500-   ST
    PLANT1-----STO1---561Mat. Doc.205.05.2011--
    1000  ST
    And with "fbl3n" for this G/L account , the same situation:
    G/LAccount1--DocumentNo101.05.2011--99--
    500-  EUR
    G/LAccount1--DocumentNo205.05.2011--89--
    1000  EUR
    We don't like this fact, someone knows how is it possible? The negative stocks aren't flagged!!!!
    Edited by: Ariana Serrano Aguila on May 5, 2011 5:50 PM

    Hi,
    Though sap allows like this ,, the document created will be with the date of the actual posting system date. If you look into the MSEG table you will get to know this.
    In theory .. this kind of practice should not be allowed .
    since this is a 562 which is a individual  entry may be system would have allowed.you try a 102 .
    Regards,

  • Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt

    Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt  movement for the same material, into the same period?
    We try to explain better, today we've done a test:
    Step 1 :   We have created a material, wich material type is HAWA, with price control V, and 1 euro for 1 ST.
    Step 2 :   We have post a good receipt movement, 561 of this material  with 1000 ST of stock, and on posting date: 05.05.2011.
    Step 3 :   Then, we have post a good issue movement, 562 of the same material, with 500 ST of stock,  on posting date: 01.05.2011 ( so that, the posting date of the 562 is before from the posting date of 561).
    And it has worked, so that on trx "mb51" for this material we saw:
    PLANT1           STO1         562           Mat. Doc.1           01.05.2011            500-  ST
    PLANT1           STO1         561           Mat. Doc.2           05.05.2011           1000  ST
    And with "fbl3n" for this G/L account , the same situation:
    G/LAccount1            DocumentNo1            01.05.2011        99            500-  EUR
    G/LAccount1            DocumentNo2            05.05.2011        89            1000  EUR
    We don't like this fact, someone knows how is it possible? The negative stocks aren't flagged!!!!
    Edited by: Ariana Serrano Aguila on May 5, 2011 5:50 PM

    SAP only checks if there is enough quantity in the period (month), it does not check if there is enough stock at date level.
    there is no stock stored in any table for a given date. SAP would need to run the logic of MB5B to calculate the stock at a certain date, this would cause tremendous performance issues.
    you either have to do this calculation yourself in a user exit, or you better train your users.

Maybe you are looking for