Post Operation Processing Initiated status after completion of approvals
Hi All,
I have implemented an approval work flow that has two levels of approvals. The two levels of approvals are completed successfully, but the status of the request is not changing to "Request Completed". The status of the request is showing as "Post Operation Processing Initiated".
Please let me know what needs to be done for the status of the request to be changed to "Request Completed".
Thanks in advance for your help.
Check for any manual provisioning task assigned to system admin or any other user according to the configuration you have provided and complete it. "Post Operation Processing Initiated" status comes after operation level approval gets completed and some provisioning task is pending. If everything is completed check for Task to object status mapping and change it to Provisioned as suggested by Rajiv.
If you still could not find what is the reason then connect to OIM db and query OSI and ORC tables to check the task which is in pending status.
Edited by: Durgaprasad on Jan 28, 2013 8:58 PM
Similar Messages
-
Post operation processing initiated
Hi,
We are implementing Oim 11.1.1.15.4
We have created a request template for providing access to resource ABC
I have attached default Beneficiary Manager Approval process with this template at operation level.
There is no other approval associated with this.
Request level and template level approval are Auto Approval.
I haven't applied any validation yet.
After the beneficiary manager has approved the request the request state is changed to "Post Operation Processing Initiated"
The task is pending with "Internal User"
Kindly suggest where it is getting stuck?
How to resolve it?
Thanks in advance.check if you have any post operation job dependent on it which is in pending state.
Post Operation Processing Initiated(Below definition given in Oracle doc)
After the actual requested operation is completed, if there exists any additional operation that needs to be executed as post-processing, the request engine moves the request to the Post Operation Processing Initiated stage, before initiating those operations. This happens after Operation Completed status. -
DI al_engine Process keeps running after completion of job
We have DI installed on Unix. We have been noticing multiple al_engine processes in active status even when there are no DI jobs running. In order to get rid of these processes, we have been periodically bouncing the server. Is there a cleaner way of releasing these processes.
Thanks,first you need to find out what are these process, do you have any real time jobs configured?
does any of your batch jobs in hanging state ? -
OIM 11gR2- Approved Requests remain in Operation Initiated Status
Hi,
We are using OIM 11gR2 and we are seeing the following behaviour whenver we request for Application Instance
1) End User logs in and requests for Application Instance.
2) The request is created and assigned to the manager for approval.
3) Manager logs in and approves the request.
4) The Requested resource is assigned to the user and the status of the resource is Provisioned. All the tasks in the Resource History are in Completed status.
5) If we see the status of the request, it remains in Operation Initiated status.
We expect the status of the Request to be Request Completed and not remain in Operation Initiated. We are sending a mail notification to the manager once resource is provisioned.
If we remove the notification part, the status of the Request is coming as Request Completed as expected. However with notification getting triggered we are getting problem.
Please suggest a solution.
Thanks and Regards,
Mayuri
Edited by: 943112 on Mar 11, 2013 7:09 AMUsually after the request is approved and if there is any pending task in provisioning it goes to 'Post Operation Processing Initiated' status. If 'Task to Object Status' mapping is not done properly the request stays in the same status even though all the tasks are completed.
check this link for various request status
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E27559_01/user.1112/e27151/req_mangmnt_user.htm#BGBGIIDH
In your case it is going to 'Operation Initiated' status when notification is attached. Can you tell where have you triggered notification? In SOA approval task or in Provisioning process? If it is in SOA check whether proper status is returned to the callback webservice after that. Else if it is in provisioning check for task object status mapping. -
Sales Order Status "Being Processed" after completion for Free Goods Sales
Hello All,
This problem is related to Free Goods Sales which is as follows.
The process-flow for free goods sales is first we raise a sales order, then we do outbound delivery for the sales order and then finally PGI of the goods.We don't raise any invoice and the Free Goods Challan is issued to the customers by running a report.
The document flow at the end always show the Sales Order status as " Being Processed" and Outbound Delivery & PGI as "Completed".I want the system to show the Sales Order status as " Completed" and not " Being Processed".How to do that?
Please suggest some solutions.
Thanks & Regards
Priyanka MitraHi Raja,
Thanks a lot for your prompt reply and suggestion.
Now we are able to get the Completed status in Document Flow.
Thanks & Regards
Priyanka Mitra
P.S. - I would request you to go through another problem which we are facing in Shipment , please go through this and suggest some solution regarding it if possible.
I have already posted this problem in a separate thread few days back but am yet to receive any fruitful suggestion.
The problem is regarding Shipment Cost Calculation while doing STO which is as follows -
In our scenario the Shipment cost calculation is done on two basis -
1) Absolute Rate / Flat Rate Wise - For example for transporting of goods from Kolkata Depot to Delhi Depot is Rs. 20,000 fixed.
2)) Gross Weight Wise - where the weight unit is kg and rate for example is Rs. 4 / Kg. So for 10 Kg the shipment cost will be Rs. 40.
Now I want the system to calculate the shipment cost on Rate / Carton Wise i.e. How will I be able to calculate the shipment cost of 100 cartons if the rate is Rs. 100/ Carton.
How to configure this ? Please help in this regard. -
BPM process faild directly after it was initiated
Hello,
Today i deployed a new version of bpm process today, wich always completed successfully. Now this process becomes status failed and is suspended immidiatley after it was initiated. The following message is given under Manage Processes -> Process Instances:
Process 'New Pool 0' suspendedjava.lang.NullPointerException
at java.lang.String.concat(String.java:1861)
at com.sap.glx.mapping.execution.implementation.function.builtin.text.TextConcatFunction.invokePrimitiveRowCell(TextConcatFunction.java:12)
at com.sap.glx.mapping.execution.implementation.invoker.MediatedPrimitiveRowCellInvoker.invokeGeneric(MediatedPrimitiveRowCellInvoker.java:79)
at com.sap.glx.mapping.execution.implementation.Interpreter$SourceResolver.resolveSourceInvocation(Interpreter.java:73)
at com.sap.glx.mapping.execution.implementation.Interpreter$SourceResolver.resolveSourceStep(Interpreter.java:91)
at com.sap.glx.mapping.execution.implementation.Interpreter$SourceResolver.resolveSource(Interpreter.java:67)
at com.sap.glx.mapping.execution.implementation.Interpreter$SourceResolver.<init>(Interpreter.java:56)
at com.sap.glx.mapping.execution.implementation.Interpreter.mapPart(Interpreter.java:145)
at com.sap.glx.mapping.execution.implementation.Interpreter.mapPart(Interpreter.java:151)
at com.sap.glx.mapping.execution.implementation.Interpreter.mapMapping(Interpreter.java:140)
at com.sap.glx.mapping.execution.implementation.Interpreter.map(Interpreter.java:135)
at com.sap.glx.core.internaladapter.Transformer$ClassRegistry$MapperClassManager$MapperClassHandler$MapperInvocationHandler.map(Transformer.java:2071)
at com.sap.glx.core.internaladapter.Transformer$ClassRegistry$MapperClassManager$MapperClassHandler$MapperInvocationHandler.invoke(Transformer.java:2048)
at com.sap.glx.core.internaladapter.Transformer$TransformerInvocationHandler.invoke(Transformer.java:576)
at com.sap.glx.core.dock.impl.DockObjectImpl.invokeMethod(DockObjectImpl.java:463)
at com.sap.glx.core.kernel.trigger.config.Script$MethodInvocation.execute(Script.java:247)
at com.sap.glx.core.kernel.trigger.config.Script.execute(Script.java:670)
at com.sap.glx.core.kernel.execution.transition.ScriptTransition.execute(ScriptTransition.java:64)
at com.sap.glx.core.kernel.execution.transition.Transition.commence(Transition.java:241)
at com.sap.glx.core.kernel.execution.LeaderWorkerPool$Follower.run(LeaderWorkerPool.java:118)
at com.sap.glx.core.resource.impl.common.WorkWrapper.run(WorkWrapper.java:58)
at com.sap.glx.core.resource.impl.j2ee.ServiceUserManager$ServiceUserImpersonator$1.run(ServiceUserManager.java:116)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:337)
at com.sap.glx.core.resource.impl.j2ee.ServiceUserManager$ServiceUserImpersonator.run(ServiceUserManager.java:114)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:169)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:266)
In the BPD there are no suggestion about any errors. The Server Log gives no error message.
Hope anyone can help me?
Edited by: tw18399 on Oct 20, 2009 2:13 PMHi,
If you are using expressions for assigning the potential users at runtime, check that the attributes that you are using have proper data. This may be one of the several reasons behind failed process instances.
Regards,
Arafat -
SYNCBO Status INCONSISTENT after Complete Synchronization
Hi Friends,
I have developed an MI application (Version - MI 2.5 SP19 Patch 07) which involves T51,S01,&T01 SyncBOs. After doing some transactions in the client I have sychronized the data with MI server. After the complete synchronization, some SyncBOs status are still INCONSISTENT and further modifications are not allowed.
The Exceptions which I got after sychronization in client side is listed below.
Exception while processing inbound container 47623D9AA1583F29E1000000C0A8090F
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Can not open new Transaction SyncTransaction (Thread=Thread-25) because there is still a pending one Transaction SyncTransaction (Thread=Thread-25)
After complete synchronization status of outbound worklist is marked "S" .What could be the possible reasons?
Thanks & Regards
Aryan
Edited by: Aryan M V on Dec 18, 2007 6:30 PMHi,
Here's something I found in a similar situation... hope this helps!
After publishing your CP5 project as a SCORM 2004 zip file, unzip the file so you can get into the separate files. Open the imsmanifest.xml file with a text editor; I like using Notepad++. Search for the line starting with <imsss:minNormalizedMeasure>. The complete line will probably look like <imss:minNormalizedMeasure></imss:minNormalizedMeasure>, this is the line that is supposed to contain your passing score (at least for our LMS). So, if your passing score is supposed to be 80%, edit this line to be: <imsss:minNormalizedMeasure>0.80</imsss:minNormalizedMeasure> and save the file. Then select all the files and re-zip them, I use 7-zip for that.
I found one other weird thing that doesn't happen 100% of the time, so test it. In the example above, try to get a score of exactly 80% (or whatever passing grade you are using) and see if you get the correct status reported. I found I sometimes have to re-edit that line in the manifest file to be 0.79 so it correctly includes an exact 80% score. No idea why and you have to watch the number of questions in your quiz to make sure that works for you mathematically.
If this works or not, I'd recommend posting your results so others can get some ideas. Good Luck!! -
How to Run Operating System Command Before/After Message Processing SAP PI
Hi,
We are trying to execute multiple commands via "Operating System Command Before/After Message Processing".
When we use single command say for example cp or mv (copy or move) the commands get executed fine.
eg: cp %F /var/opt/data/outbound/Test/Dummy.txt
/this works fine/
when we club commands together or try to redirect the outputs of commands, none of the commands get executed.
eg:
cp %F /var/opt/data/outbound/Test/Dummy.txt ; rm %F
or
wc -l %F > /var/opt/data/outbound/Test/Dummy.txt
Is it possible to execute multiple commands or redirect the output of commands without using a shell script? The PI server we are working on iis hosted on UNIX environment.Hi Harleen,
try like this
cp %F /var/opt/data/outbound/Test/Dummy.txt ; rm %F
instead of semicolon try this
(1) &
command1 & command2
Execute Command1 and then execute Command2
(2) &&
command1 && command2
Runs the command2 only when command1 doesn't Complete successfully
(3) ||
command1 || command2
Runs the second command if the first command had an error
(4) ()
(command1 || command2) || (command3 & command4)
Defines the order in which commands are to be executed
Regards
Suraj -
Status of the sales orders is showing as open even after completed
Dear experts,
I would like to know the orders which are still not completed . In Va05 Report i am getting orders which are already completed. But when i check document flow in Va02 It is showing status accounting document not cleared.I am sure that billing is already done for this orders. Kindly help how to change the status to completed.Hi,
You are getting the status as "Not cleared" which means that the payment has not yet been done.
Please do this by using the T.Code "F-28".
Goto the T.Code "F-28".
Enter the date,G/L account,Amount.Select the document number.
Click on "Process open items".
Enter your document number.Ensure that the not assigned is equal to "0".
Click on Simulate.
Save.
Before doing this goto the T.Code "FBL5n".
Click on "open items".Your sales order will be displayed in open items.
When you pay this amount it will be displayed in "Cleared items".
Simultaneously,the status will be changed.
Regards,
Krishna. -
Post order processing for sales document is not yet complete
hi,
sap gurus,
i am facing the error while saving the sales order and this ticket is unique and it is saying that
"post order processing for sales document is not yet complete".
please help me in this regard.
and it is blocking the order for further processing.
regards,
balajitI dont think this is a standard error message. Some exit is applied for sale order to meet some requirements. You need to check with your ABAPer.
In fact, you can conclude yourself based on the error message number. If it starts with Z, then the above holds good.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
Lumia 920 pre & post processing of pics after Ambe...
Hey folks, im starting this thread in order to grab more attention from Nokia. As they are already aware of the yellowish tint in photos since the amber update, I wanna just add something extra. I have attached 2 sample images of pictures below. Both photos were shot at ISO3200 to really show what this phone is capable of. Each picture will come with a before processing happens and after. Not only can you tell theres a yellowish tint in the post processing pics, but you can also see severe noise reduction. Sure, ISO3200 is a bit on a smartphone, but take a close look at the pics before the processing happens and tell me that isn't a amazing picture at ISO3200. White balance is spot on, and sharpness is excellent. Im sorry, but the aggressive noise reduction Nokia applies is not needed on this phone. Nokia I think most people buy these lumia 920 and 1020 phones based on cameras. I think most people can agree that while we may not ask you to remove your noise reduction settings, but rather add an option for us users who would like to skip out on the post processing that happens. You can clearly see in the before and after pics below how amazing an ISO3200 shot from this phone is.....let us have it please!!!
Attachments:
After Processing.jpg 3241 KB
wp_ss_20130912_0005.png 1705 KBTHE OTHER COMPARISON HERE:
Attachments:
After Processing (2).jpg 3166 KB
wp_ss_20130912_0006.png 1597 KB -
Trigger a process chain(PC) after successfull completion of two other PCs
Hi All,
My requirement is to trigger a Process Chain only after successfull completion of two other process chain which are already scheduled to run at different times.
Please tell me how to achieve this into SAP-BW 3.5
Thanks
JharnaHi
It is very simple, I'm doing the same.
Insert Remote Process Chain at the end of the actual process chain and call the other process chain, here you need to give source , destination and process chain name in Remote process chain.
try it, it will work.
Thanks
Reddy -
Encore CS6 doesn't open after the process "Initializing Media Layer"
When Encore CS6 loads, the program just disappears. The problem occurs at the process "Initializing Media Layer".
PC Configuration: Core i7950, Asus P6TD Deluxe, 12GB DDR3 1600MHZ, Quadro K4000, SSD for the system, Seagate Constellation 7200rpm for video editing.
Encore is downloaded as part of Premiere Pro CS6 at Creative Cloud.
I am desperate, as I cannot deliver my Blu-ray's and DVD's without Encore.
I would be grateful with your help.
Thank you,
Stavros SymeonidisWhen Encore CS6 loads, the program just disappears. The problem occurs at the process "Initializing Media Layer".
Based on the few references I see to this error, I would do a reinstall. This is no guarantee.
I assume that you are opening Encore without starting it by opening a project.
I do not know what special problems may be involved in the relationship of CC installs and Encore (and the order of various installations), but I do not think this error should result. -
Re: Sales Order Output trigger after Overall status is Complete
Hello Friends,
We have a requirement where in , we want to trigger the Sales Order Ouput once the overall status is completed.
Basically , the print program should trigger only when Overall status of Sales Order is Complete.
Can anyone suggest any way to achieve this requirement ?
Thanks in advance.
Julie.Hi,
For this we have to go for ABAP development/a "Z" program.
This program/conditions will be maintained at the smart form level.
This has to be triggered only when the over all status is complete.
This thing we have to check in table "VBUK".
Pass your order number into "VBELN" and check for the field "GBSTK".If it is "C" then only it should be triggered.
We have to write a small line before this triggering program or condition is to be maintained in smart form if you are using it.Contact your ABAPer.
Regards,
Krishna. -
DNS is waiting for AD to signal the initial replication has completed
Hello,
First off, thank you for your help in advanced. Any help you can offer would be appreciated, and let me know if there's more information you need
me to provide, or utilities to run.
I have just joined a Server 2012 R2 DC to my Server 2008 R2 domain. Topology is it only had one DC previously, the 2008 R2, running AD/DNS/DHCP.
I ran the forest prep & domain prep on the 2008 R2 domain controller, then ran a dcpromo on the 2012 R2. From there, I migrated the FSMO roles over to the 2012 R2 server using ntdsutil.exe. The ultimate goal is to retire the 2008 R2 DC and
bring on line a 2nd 2012 R2 DC for this domain.
My Issues
Windows 7 client PC's do not always resolve/pass traffic to the Server 2012 R2 server, sometimes I need to ping
the server by IP before it will resolve, other times if I just repeatedly double click on the shared folder mapped to the Server 2012 R2 DC it will work eventually. This is intermittent/random,
and not always repeatable with any specific procedures. Sometimes the user will be working, then all of the sudden they can't resolve DNS to the internet, nor internally.
I am getting the following errors in the event log on my 2012 R2 DC
Log Name: DNS Server
Source: Microsoft-Windows-DNS-Server-Service
Date: 3/16/2014 8:02:34 PM
Event ID: 4013
Task Category: None
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: HSSserver.carman.local
Description:
The DNS server is waiting for Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) to signal that the initial synchronization of the directory has been completed. The DNS server service cannot start
until the initial synchronization is complete because critical DNS data might not yet be replicated onto this domain controller. If events in the AD DS event log indicate that there
is a problem with DNS name resolution, consider adding the IP address of another DNS server for this domain to the DNS server list in the Internet Protocol properties of this computer. This event will
be logged every two minutes until AD DS has signaled that the initial synchronization has successfully completed.
Log Name: Directory Service
Source: Microsoft-Windows-ActiveDirectory_DomainService
Date: 3/16/2014 8:56:17 PM
Event ID: 2092
Task Category: Replication
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: ANONYMOUS LOGON
Computer: HSSserver.carman.local
Description:
This server is the owner of the following FSMO role, but does not consider it valid. For the partition which contains the FSMO, this server has
not replicated successfully with any of its partners since this server has been restarted. Replication errors are preventing validation of this role.
Operations which require contacting a FSMO operation master will fail until this condition is corrected.
FSMO Role: CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=carman,DC=local
User Action:
1. Initial synchronization is the first early replications done by a system as it is starting. A failure to initially synchronize may explain why a FSMO role cannot be validated. This process is explained in KB article 305476.
2. This server has one or more replication partners, and replication is failing for all of these partners. Use the command repadmin /showrepl to display the replication errors. Correct the error in question. For example there maybe problems with IP connectivity,
DNS name resolution, or security authentication that are preventing successful replication.
3. In the rare event that all replication partners are expected to be offline (for example, because of maintenance or disaster recovery), you can force the role to be validated. This can be done by using NTDSUTIL.EXE to seize the role to the same server. This
may be done using the steps provided in KB articles 255504 and 324801 on.
The following operations may be impacted:
Schema: You will no longer be able to modify the schema for this forest.
Domain Naming: You will no longer be able to add or remove domains from this forest.
PDC: You will no longer be able to perform primary domain controller operations, such as Group Policy updates and password resets for non-Active Directory Domain Services accounts.
RID: You will not be able to allocation new security identifiers for new user accounts, computer accounts or security groups.
Infrastructure: Cross-domain name references, such as universal group memberships, will not be updated properly if their target object is moved or renamed.
Log Name: Directory Service
Source: Microsoft-Windows-ActiveDirectory_DomainService
Date: 3/16/2014 8:56:17 PM
Event ID: 2092
Task Category: Replication
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: ANONYMOUS LOGON
Computer: HSSserver.carman.local
Description:
This server is the owner of the following FSMO role, but does not consider it valid. For the partition which contains the FSMO, this server has
not replicated successfully with any of its partners since this server has been restarted. Replication errors are preventing validation of this role.
Operations which require contacting a FSMO operation master will fail until this condition is corrected.
FSMO Role: CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=carman,DC=local
User Action:
1. Initial synchronization is the first early replications done by a system as it is starting. A failure to initially synchronize may explain why a FSMO role cannot be validated. This process is explained in KB article 305476.
2. This server has one or more replication partners, and replication is failing for all of these partners. Use the command repadmin /showrepl to display the replication errors. Correct the error in question. For example there maybe problems with IP connectivity,
DNS name resolution, or security authentication that are preventing successful replication.
3. In the rare event that all replication partners are expected to be offline (for example, because of maintenance or disaster recovery), you can force the role to be validated. This can be done by using NTDSUTIL.EXE to seize the role to the same server. This
may be done using the steps provided in KB articles 255504 and 324801 on
The following operations may be impacted:
Schema: You will no longer be able to modify the schema for this forest.
Domain Naming: You will no longer be able to add or remove domains from this forest.
PDC: You will no longer be able to perform primary domain controller operations, such as Group Policy updates and password resets for non-Active Directory Domain Services accounts.
RID: You will not be able to allocation new security identifiers for new user accounts, computer accounts or security groups.
Infrastructure: Cross-domain name references, such as universal group memberships, will not be updated properly if their target object is moved or renamed.
Log Name: DFS Replication
Source: DFSR
Date: 3/16/2014 11:21:43 PM
Event ID: 5014
Task Category: None
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: HSSserver.carman.local
Description:
The DFS Replication service is stopping communication with partner CARMANSERVER for replication group Domain System Volume due to an error. The service will retry the connection periodically.
Additional Information:
Error: 1726 (The remote procedure call failed.)
Connection ID: 020D5B10-4876-4888-9214-45E3D8B3206D
Replication Group ID: 8A8ADB84-CB25-495E-8C28-AE9FD1761E85
From the Server 2008 R2 DC, I get the following errors/warnings in my event log:
Log Name: Directory Service
Source: Microsoft-Windows-ActiveDirectory_DomainService
Date: 3/16/2014 8:02:45 PM
Event ID: 2088
Task Category: DS RPC Client
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: ANONYMOUS LOGON
Computer: CARMANSERVER.carman.local
Description:
Active Directory Domain Services could not use DNS to resolve the IP address of the source domain controller listed below. To maintain the consistency of Security groups, group policy,
users and computers and their passwords, Active Directory Domain Services successfully replicated using the NetBIOS or fully qualified computer name of the source domain controller.
Invalid DNS configuration may be affecting other essential operations on member computers, domain controllers or application servers in this Active Directory Domain Services forest,
including logon authentication or access to network resources.
You should immediately resolve this DNS configuration error so that this domain controller can resolve the IP address of the source domain controller using DNS.
Alternate server name:
HSSserver.carman.local
Failing DNS host name:
25346b74-2fc2-4311-a54d-d500669d4026._msdcs.carman.local
NOTE: By default, only up to 10 DNS failures are shown for any given 12 hour period, even if more than 10 failures occur. To log all individual failure events, set the following
diagnostics registry value to 1:
Registry Path:
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\NTDS\Diagnostics\22 DS RPC Client
User Action:
1) If the source domain controller is no longer functioning or its operating system has been reinstalled with a different computer name or NTDSDSA object GUID, remove the source
domain controller's metadata with ntdsutil.exe, using the steps outlined in MSKB article 216498.
2) Confirm that the source domain controller is running Active Directory Domain Services and is accessible on the network by typing "net view <DC
name>" or "ping <source DC name>".
3) Verify that the source domain controller is using a valid DNS server for DNS services, and that the source domain controller's host record and CNAME record are correctly registered,
using the DNS Enhanced version of DCDIAG.EXE available on
dcdiag /test:dns
4) Verify that this destination domain controller is using a valid DNS server for DNS services, by running the DNS Enhanced version of DCDIAG.EXE command on the console of the
destination domain controller, as follows:
dcdiag /test:dns
5) For further analysis of DNS error failures see KB 824449:
Additional Data
Error value:
11004 The requested name is valid, but no data of the requested type was found.
Log Name: DNS Server
Source: Microsoft-Windows-DNS-Server-Service
Date: 3/16/2014 8:02:19 PM
Event ID: 4013
Task Category: None
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: CARMANSERVER.carman.local
Description:
The DNS server is waiting for Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) to signal that the initial synchronization of the directory has been completed. The DNS server service cannot start
until the initial synchronization is complete because critical DNS data might not yet be replicated onto this domain controller. If events in the AD DS event log indicate that there
is a problem with DNS name resolution, consider adding the IP address of another DNS server for this domain to the DNS server list in the Internet Protocol properties of this computer. This event will be
logged every two minutes until AD DS has signaled that the initial synchronization has successfully completed.
Log Name: System
Source: Microsoft-Windows-DNS-Client
Date: 3/16/2014 8:01:55 PM
Event ID: 1014
Task Category: None
Level: Warning
Keywords:
User: NETWORK SERVICE
Computer: CARMANSERVER.carman.local
Description:
Name resolution for the name _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.carman.local timed out after none of the configured DNS servers responded.
Log Name: System
Source: NETLOGON
Date: 3/16/2014 8:02:07 PM
Event ID: 3096
Task Category: None
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: CARMANSERVER.carman.local
Description:
The primary Domain Controller for this domain could not be located.
Log Name: System
Source: Microsoft-Windows-WinRM
Date: 3/16/2014 8:05:08 PM
Event ID: 10154
Task Category: None
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: CARMANSERVER.carman.local
Description:
The WinRM service failed to create the following SPNs: WSMAN/CARMANSERVER.carman.local; WSMAN/CARMANSERVER.
Additional Data
The error received was 8344: %%8344.
User Action
The SPNs can be created by an administrator using setspn.exe utility.
Log Name: System
Source: Microsoft-Windows-DistributedCOM
Date: 3/16/2014 10:50:55 PM
Event ID: 10009
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: CARMANSERVER.carman.local
Description:
DCOM was unable to communicate with the computer 208.67.222.222 using any of the configured protocolsSorry, the forum limited me to only 60000 characters per post, so here is some more detailed information:
Here's some initial diags/info from my server 2012 DC:
c:\windows\system32\dcdiag /test:DNS /v /e
Directory Server Diagnosis
Performing initial setup:
Trying to find home server...
* Verifying that the local machine HSSserver, is a Directory Server.
Home Server = HSSserver
* Connecting to directory service on server HSSserver.
* Identified AD Forest.
Collecting AD specific global data
* Collecting site info.
Calling ldap_search_init_page(hld,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=carman,DC=local,LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE,(objectCategory=ntDSSiteSettings),.......
The previous call succeeded
Iterating through the sites
Looking at base site object: CN=NTDS Site Settings,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=carman,DC=local
Getting ISTG and options for the site
* Identifying all servers.
Calling ldap_search_init_page(hld,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=carman,DC=local,LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE,(objectClass=ntDSDsa),.......
The previous call succeeded....
The previous call succeeded
Iterating through the list of servers
Getting information for the server CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CARMANSERVER,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=carman,DC=local
objectGuid obtained
InvocationID obtained
dnsHostname obtained
site info obtained
All the info for the server collected
Getting information for the server CN=NTDS Settings,CN=HSSSERVER,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=carman,DC=local
objectGuid obtained
InvocationID obtained
dnsHostname obtained
site info obtained
All the info for the server collected
* Identifying all NC cross-refs.
* Found 2 DC(s). Testing 2 of them.
Done gathering initial info.
Doing initial required tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\CARMANSERVER
Starting test: Connectivity
* Active Directory LDAP Services Check
Determining IP4 connectivity
* Active Directory RPC Services Check
The clock difference between the home server HSSSERVER and target
server CARMANSERVER is greater than one minute. This may cause
Kerberos authentication failures. Please check that the time service
is working properly. You may need to resynchonize the time between
these servers.
......................... CARMANSERVER passed test Connectivity
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\HSSSERVER
Starting test: Connectivity
* Active Directory LDAP Services Check
Determining IP4 connectivity
* Active Directory RPC Services Check
......................... HSSSERVER passed test Connectivity
Doing primary tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\CARMANSERVER
Test omitted by user request: Advertising
Test omitted by user request: CheckSecurityError
Test omitted by user request: CutoffServers
Test omitted by user request: FrsEvent
Test omitted by user request: DFSREvent
Test omitted by user request: SysVolCheck
Test omitted by user request: KccEvent
Test omitted by user request: KnowsOfRoleHolders
Test omitted by user request: MachineAccount
Test omitted by user request: NCSecDesc
Test omitted by user request: NetLogons
Test omitted by user request: ObjectsReplicated
Test omitted by user request: OutboundSecureChannels
Test omitted by user request: Replications
Test omitted by user request: RidManager
Test omitted by user request: Services
Test omitted by user request: SystemLog
Test omitted by user request: Topology
Test omitted by user request: VerifyEnterpriseReferences
Test omitted by user request: VerifyReferences
Test omitted by user request: VerifyReplicas
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\HSSSERVER
Test omitted by user request: Advertising
Test omitted by user request: CheckSecurityError
Test omitted by user request: CutoffServers
Test omitted by user request: FrsEvent
Test omitted by user request: DFSREvent
Test omitted by user request: SysVolCheck
Test omitted by user request: KccEvent
Test omitted by user request: KnowsOfRoleHolders
Test omitted by user request: MachineAccount
Test omitted by user request: NCSecDesc
Test omitted by user request: NetLogons
Test omitted by user request: ObjectsReplicated
Test omitted by user request: OutboundSecureChannels
Test omitted by user request: Replications
Test omitted by user request: RidManager
Test omitted by user request: Services
Test omitted by user request: SystemLog
Test omitted by user request: Topology
Test omitted by user request: VerifyEnterpriseReferences
Test omitted by user request: VerifyReferences
Test omitted by user request: VerifyReplicas
Starting test: DNS
DNS Tests are running and not hung. Please wait a few minutes...
Starting test: DNS
See DNS test in enterprise tests section
for results
......................... HSSSERVER passed test DNS
See DNS test in enterprise tests section for results
......................... CARMANSERVER passed test DNS
Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones
Test omitted by user request: CheckSDRefDom
Test omitted by user request: CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones
Test omitted by user request: CheckSDRefDom
Test omitted by user request: CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : Schema
Test omitted by user request: CheckSDRefDom
Test omitted by user request: CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : Configuration
Test omitted by user request: CheckSDRefDom
Test omitted by user request: CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : carman
Test omitted by user request: CheckSDRefDom
Test omitted by user request: CrossRefValidation
Running enterprise tests on : carman.local
Starting test: DNS
Test results for domain controllers:
DC: HSSserver.carman.local
Domain: carman.local
TEST: Authentication (Auth)
Authentication test: Successfully completed
TEST: Basic (Basc)
The OS
Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard
(Service Pack level: 0.0)
is supported.
NETLOGON service is running
kdc service is running
DNSCACHE service is running
DNS service is running
DC is a DNS server
Network adapters information:
Adapter [00000010] Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit
Ethernet:
MAC address is F0:1F:AF:E1:D1:C4
IP Address is static
IP address: 192.168.17.7, fe80::35d3:8713:ce0a:3680
DNS servers:
192.168.17.7
(HSSSERVER) [Valid]
192.168.17.5 (carmanserver.carman.local.) [Valid]
The A host record(s) for this DC was found
The SOA record for the Active Directory zone was found
The Active Directory zone on this DC/DNS server was found primary
Root zone on this DC/DNS server was not found
TEST: Forwarders/Root hints (Forw)
Recursion is enabled
Forwarders Information:
208.67.220.220 (<name unavailable>) [Valid]
208.67.222.222 (<name unavailable>) [Valid]
TEST: Delegations (Del)
Delegation information for the zone: carman.local.
Delegated domain name: _msdcs.carman.local.
DNS server: carmanserver.carman.local. IP:192.168.17.5 [Valid]
TEST: Dynamic update (Dyn)
Test record dcdiag-test-record added successfully in zone carman.local
Test record dcdiag-test-record deleted successfully in zone carman.local
TEST: Records registration (RReg)
Network Adapter
[00000010] Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet:
Matching CNAME record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
25346b74-2fc2-4311-a54d-d500669d4026._msdcs.carman.local
Matching A record found
at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
HSSserver.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
_ldap._tcp.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
_ldap._tcp.e6c304e4-c161-4258-8d51-5a2f20a61c7a.domains._msdcs.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
_kerberos._tcp.dc._msdcs.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
_ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
_kerberos._tcp.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
_kerberos._udp.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
_kpasswd._tcp.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
_ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
_kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
_ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
_kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
_ldap._tcp.gc._msdcs.carman.local
Matching A record found
at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
gc._msdcs.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
_gc._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
_ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.gc._msdcs.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.7:
_ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.carman.local
Matching CNAME record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
25346b74-2fc2-4311-a54d-d500669d4026._msdcs.carman.local
Matching A record found
at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
HSSserver.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
_ldap._tcp.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
_ldap._tcp.e6c304e4-c161-4258-8d51-5a2f20a61c7a.domains._msdcs.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
_kerberos._tcp.dc._msdcs.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
_ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
_kerberos._tcp.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
_kerberos._udp.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
_kpasswd._tcp.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
_ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
_kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
_ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
_kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
_ldap._tcp.gc._msdcs.carman.local
Matching A record found
at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
gc._msdcs.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
_gc._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
_ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.gc._msdcs.carman.local
Matching SRV record
found at DNS server 192.168.17.5:
_ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.carman.local
DC: CARMANSERVER.carman.local
Domain: carman.local
TEST: Authentication (Auth)
Authentication test: Successfully completed
TEST: Basic (Basc)
The OS
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard
(Service Pack level: 1.0)
is supported.
NETLOGON service is running
kdc service is running
DNSCACHE service is running
DNS service is running
DC is a DNS server
Network adapters information:
Adapter
[00000007] Broadcom BCM5716C NetXtreme II
GigE (NDIS VBD Client):
MAC address is A4:BA:DB:12:D1:77
IP Address is static
IP address: 192.168.17.5
DNS servers:
127.0.0.1
(carmanserver.carman.local.) [Valid]
192.168.17.7 (HSSSERVER) [Valid]
The A host record(s) for this DC was found
The SOA record for the Active Directory zone was found
The Active Directory zone on this DC/DNS server was found primary
Root zone on this DC/DNS server was not found
TEST: Forwarders/Root hints (Forw)
Recursion is enabled
Forwarders Information:
208.67.220.220 (<name unavailable>) [Valid]
208.67.222.222 (<name unavailable>) [Valid]
TEST: Delegations (Del)
Delegation information for the zone: carman.local.
Delegated domain name: _msdcs.carman.local.
DNS server: carmanserver.carman.local. IP:192.168.17.5 [Valid]
TEST: Dynamic update (Dyn)
Test record dcdiag-test-record added successfully in zone carman.local
Test record dcdiag-test-record deleted successfully in zone carman.local
TEST: Records registration (RReg)
Network Adapter
[00000007] Broadcom BCM5716C NetXtreme II
GigE (NDIS VBD Client):
Maybe you are looking for
-
How do you use forward and back button on mouse and use "zoom" in web browser.
Ok so apparently this forum is ruled with an iron fist or something my very honest and truthful problems with these issues seem to have been instantly deleted in my last discussion? I'll try this once more. 1) How do you use the forward and back butt
-
ITunes 11.1.2 and iOS 7.0.3 Smart Playlists not working
I am unable to get a smart playlist of mine to update on my iPhone 4s. The smart playlist is updated on my iMac and the items in it are copied across to my 4s but the playlist on my 4s is not getting updated. This just started 2 days ago. When I sync
-
N9: MfE Hotmail: Mail Storage Full Free some space...
Hi Friends, Does anyone having the error " Mail Storage Full free up some space first"...? I have this issue with N9. I just deleted the account and added it again and Hotmail working under mmailsettings.. but no contacts. I have so many issues with
-
Decompile JAR , Update .Class file , Compile?
Is it possible to decompile a excutable JAR file, update the .class file and compile it again? I'm using DJ Decompile software. Need your expertise.. =P
-
APP-GME-82860 : YOU DONT HAVE ACCESS TO ANY MATERIAL VIEWS ON THIS FORM
Dear all I created a new Responsability for the Production supervisor and when switch to new responsability this message apper and the form fail to start .. did i miss any thing ??? what can i do to solve this problem ??? Thank you