Posting differeences between GR qty and TO confirmation qty

dear experts,
my scenario is of STO. I am transfering material from one plant to Central warehouse for which i have created a STPO of 50 qty at central warehouse. w.r.t. STPO I did delivery from issuing plant followed by picking of 50 qty. Then I did MIGO at receiving plant of 50 qty. and a TO gets created automatically. I confirm this TO at the time of actual placing of material in the bin. at the time of placing the material actually in the bin I found that there was shortage in material by 10 pcs so I confirmed my TO only for 40 pcs. now in PO purchase order history it shows GR of 50 qty and in TO 40 qty. how to post the difference. will it reflect in inventory management level also. how?
your help will highly appreciated.
thanks
ujwal

Hi,
When you post the differences while confirming the TO, the differences will be moved to 999 storage type.You have to clear the differences at IM level.You would also need to inform your purchasing department about updating the PO for 40 qty as received.
Thanks

Similar Messages

Differeence between Lock object and enqueue_e_table

Hi ,
what is diff between Lock object and enque_e_table. Where to use enqueue_e_table and where to use lock object.
I think with a lock object i can lock more than one table (passing tables in secondary table). Please correct me.

A lock object does not really "lock a table" though most of lock objects refer to a database table.
I explain:
The principle is that when 2 programs lock at the same time with the same lock object, only the first will succeed.
If you have a program which does not use the lock, it may update the database table without any problem.
All programs which update a table have to use the same lock object. Note that users are always able to update this table via SM30 as they don't know the lock object to be used.
enqueue_xxxx is the name of the generated function module used to lock the xxxx lock object. E_TABLE lock is ONLY used by SM30 if I remember well, so that to prevent one table from being updated via SM30 by 2 persons at the same time. But it is not related at all with programs which would also update this table.
Edited by: Sandra Rossi on Mar 14, 2010 9:53 PM

Order qty and total confirmed qty in PI sheets

Dear Experts,
Kindly suggest the possibility of appearing total order qty and already confirmed qty in the PI sheet, system useually provides the same while performing confirmation through co11n or cor6.
Thanks in advance for your help..
Regards,
Nitish

Hi Srini,
The following details are available in the table AFVV,
Standard value, operation qty & Base qty.
With this values create a formula Standard value * operation qty/ Base qty , this will equal to the planned hours for that particular activity type. Similarlt planned hours for other activities can be calculated.
The actual/confirmed hours are available in the table AFRU.
Regards,
Senthilkumar

Changes between park document and post document

Hi SAP Gurues
Depending upon the business practice at the time of posting the approver changes the figure once the document is posted.How to know what are the changes have been made between the parking and posting.How to know it?
Your kind cooperation is solicited.
sk

Hi,
It better to use save as completed - reason being when SAVE AS COMPLETED the entire document is checked for parking i.e, simulted before parking.
Eg,
If cost center us not assigned, then when SAVE AS COMPLETED the an error msg will pop up.
if you want user to use only SAVE AS COMPLETED then in FB00 you can set the indicator for each individual.
Hope this info is usefull.
Thanks
Sujai C

Difference between Stock transfer and transfer posting

I am little confused about the difference between stock transfer and transfer posting. Please clarify
<<Locked - reason: failed to search before posting question>>
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Feb 9, 2011 9:10 AM

Hello,
Transfer posting may involve or not involve the physical goods transfer. In the system you might do transfer posting from quality to unrestricted, or from one store location to another.
In transfer posting you remove and or replace materials from storage in one storage location and place them in another storage location.
That transction code you use for transfer posting MB1B with following movement types may be used
301, 303,305,311,411,309.
301 is Stock Transfer Between Plants in One Step
303 & 305 : Stock Transfer Between Plants in Two Steps
In stock transfer, it always involves physical movement of goods, like transfer between plants under same company code or different company codes.
Following types are possible with STO's
Stock Transport Order Without Delivery
Stock Transport Order with Delivery via Shipping
Stock Transport Order with Delivery and Billing Document/Invoice
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/4d/2b90dc43ad11d189410000e829fbbd/content.htm
Please go through attach SAP document
BR,
Tushar

Difference between Withdrawal Qty and Allocated

Hi!
Can anyone tell me the difference between Withdrawal Qty and Allocated in tcode RRP3 in tab Forecast?
In tab detail I have the Plan Qty (Forecast) and the Withdrawal Qty that most of days is the same quantity as Plan Qty and no value in Allocated. The category text is Forecast is this cases.
In other days, I have Withdrawal Qty different from Plan Qty and values in Allocated. I see that the allocated values are from orders or deliveries because the category text is SalesOrder or Deliv. and I see the ECC document number, but what means Withdrawal Qty in this and other case?
EX:
date                  material    location     category text Plan Qty Withdrawal Qty Allocated
12.03.2009     1270999     UN02     FC req.            726         726                       0
17.03.2009     1270333     UN02     FC req.          1.478         410                     60
17.03.2009     1270999     UN76        SalesOrder     0     0                             40
17.03.2009     1270999     UN769     SalesOrder     0     0                             20
Regards,
Teresa Lopes

Hi Teresa,
The forecast tab shows the consumption scenario.
It has Planned Qty. , Allocated Qty., Withdrawal and remaining.
Planned Qty. is the qty in forecast keyfigure
Allocated is the qty. allocated to the sales order by the system.
Withdrawal is the qty. totally deduced from the forecast once the order is PGIed.
Remaining is the qty. left in forecast
Example:
If the strategy is 10 ( sales orders do not consume forecast)
You have a forecast of 100 PCs
Planned qty: 100
Allocated Qty: 0
Withdrawal: 0
Remaining: 100
You create a sales order of 50 PCs
Planned qty: 100
Allocated Qty: 50
Withdrawal: 0
Remaining: 100
You create a delivery for this sales order of 50 PCs
Planned qty: 100
Allocated Qty: 50
Withdrawal: 0
Remaining: 100
You PGI the delivery for this sales order of 50 PCs
Planned qty: 100
Allocated Qty:0
Withdrawal: 50
Remaining: 50
The same above thing when the strategy is anything else except 10 like 20, 30 or 40 ( sales orders consume forecast)
You have a forecast of 100 PCs
Planned qty: 100
Allocated Qty: 0
Withdrawal: 0
Remaining: 100
You create a sales order of 50 PCs
Planned qty: 100
Allocated Qty: 50
Withdrawal: 0
Remaining: 50
You create a delivery for this sales order of 50 PCs
Planned qty: 100
Allocated Qty: 50
Withdrawal: 0
Remaining: 50
You PGI the delivery for this sales order of 50 PCs
Planned qty: 100
Allocated Qty:0
Withdrawal: 50
Remaining: 50
Hope this helps.

Difference between ATP qty and cumulative ATP qty

Can anyone advise what's the difference between ATP qty and cumulative ATP qty with examples?
Thanks
Peter

Hi Peter,
ATP quantity
The quantity available to MRP for new sales orders.
The ATP (Available-to-promise) quantity is calculated according to the following formula:
ATP quantity = warehouse stock + planned receipts - planned issues.
Please go through this link you can able to have idea on cumulative ATP
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/dd/55ff72545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

What is the difference between Commit, Commit_Form and Post ?

What is the difference between Commit, Commit_Form and Post ?

Commit() and commit_form() are exactly the same. The changes done into the databased blocks are made in the database select/insert/update and commited.
post() does the same, but without the last commit in the database (so that you can rollback).
Francois

Difference between Parked invoice and posted park invoice.

Dear All,
I am trying to create a new program to extract the invoices posted by MIRO and MIR7. I have no problem to find invoices posted by MIRO in RBKP and RSEG.
However, as currenty one user will use MIR7 to park invoices and another user will use MIRO to post the invoices, I don't know how to sparate the parked invoice and posted park invoice. C's I have found that the parked not posted invoice and posted park invoice were all displayed in RBKP with transaction code MIR7.
Thank you very much
Emma

Hi,
*Park*
If the Invoice document is missing some information that is required for posting. In this case we will park the document. Here some preliminary checks will be performed. Balance might not be zero.But in this case updates were performed.
*Post*
The invoice was posted online and verified as being correct(Balance must be Zero). Updates were made.
Please use RBKP-RBSTAT field to find out the different type os status.
I hope this helps.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni

What is the difference between ECC 5 and ECC 6.0

Dear Experts,
Can any one tell me in detail the difference between SAP R/3 versions ECC 5 and ECC 6 functionality wise in MM mdoule?
To be specific what are the new features in MM being added in ECC 6.0 when compared with ECC 5.
Request your help in this regard.
Rgds,
Uzair
Edited by: Mohd Uzair Hussain on Jul 23, 2008 5:35 PM

Hi,
Refer following link;
[SAP ERP Solution Browser|http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/]
Following are the basic differences as far as MM Module is concerned;
Pickup list - Batch where-used list display in transaction MB56
u2022 Until release 4.7, the top-down and bottom-up analyses in the function pickup list for batch where-used list (transaction MB5C) were displayed only in the form of simple output lists. As of release 6.00 of SAP ERP Central Component, the function pickup list for batch where-used list branches to the batch where-used list itself (transaction MB56).
u2022 In addition, user can define how the data in the batch where-used list is displayed, in the initial screen.
u2022 User can use all the settings available in the batch where-used list. For example, he can expand transfer posting or display vendor batch. However, it is not possible to limit the selection to valid plants in the initial screen of the pickup list.
Usability enhancements for transaction MIGO for the posting of goods movements
u2022 For goods movements that refer to purchase orders as reference documents (for example, goods receipt, goods issue, subsequent adjustment), user can specify the ordering plant as an additional selection criterion directly next to the purchase order number and the item number.
u2022 There is a new default value: "copy account assignment fields." When entering other goods receipts, user can copy existing account assignment data from the previous item to use as the default values for a new item. To do this, user has to set the copy account assignment fields indicator in the default values.
u2022 User changes the default values in the menu path "Settings -> Default Values."
u2022 Goods movement is monitored with reference to a material document. When you enter the following goods movements, it is possible to specify a material document, such as the following, as the reference document:
- Goods receipt
- Goods issue
- Transfer posting
- Remove from storage
u2022 Note that these material documents must be documents that have arisen from a goods movement without reference ("Others") and that are not reversal documents.
New report : display list of invoice documents (MIR5)
u2022 Logistics invoice verification offers a new report display list of invoice documents (RMMR1MDI), w hich user can use to display such a list (Transaction is MIR5).
u2022 As an addition to the existing program invoice overview (transaction code MIR6), user have extended selection criteria and display options. For example, on the initial screen user can make selections by one-time customers, invoice gross amount, and entry date.
u2022 User can also show an expert mode, which enables him to select at plant level by FI document, GL A/c posting, and Material Posting.
u2022 In the output list, the report shows both posted and held invoices.
u2022 It does not show invoices without a corresponding FI document; such as invoices planned for verification in the background or which the software has already verified as containing errors.
Requirement prioritizations in materials management
u2022 With Requirement Prioritization functionality user can assign requirement urgency at item level in purchasing and reservation documents.
u2022 The software determines the relevant requirement priority (overall priority) of a material requisition from the combination of requirement urgency group and organizational priority.
Mass maintenance of outline agreements
The following two transactions available:
u2022 Mass maintenance for contracts: transaction code MEMASSCONTRACT
u2022 Mass maintenance for scheduling agreements: transaction code MEMASSSA
Commitment plan for purchase contracts
u2022 With the function of the commitment plan for purchase contracts, it is possible to pre plan value consumption for a purchase contract.
u2022 To this end, a commitment plan is generated for each document item of the relevant contract.
u2022 This commitment plan itself can have any number of items.
u2022 User can define a value and a validity date for each commitment plan item.
u2022 This enables user to pre plan different values for different periods of time.
u2022 The software generates an earmarked fund document for a defined commitment plan item.
u2022 This earmarked funds document can in turn contain several different items with different account assignments.
u2022 The software adopts these account assignments from the item account assignments of the commitment plan.
u2022 If a purchase requisition or purchase order references this contract, the earmarked funds document is copied into the purchase order, and the account assignment is adopted from that document.
u2022 Account assignment to a different account assignment object is then no longer allowed.
Availability check in "Enjoy purchase order and requisition"
u2022 Display and checking of availability are invokable separately in the "Enjoy purchase order and requisition" function, in line with the software behavior on the sales side.
u2022 User invoke the display and checking of availability in the "Enjoy purchase order" function (transaction code ME21N) and the "Enjoy purchase requisition" function (transaction code ME51N) as follows:
- To display the availability overview, choose the menu path "Environment -> Availability." - To check availability, choose the "Check Availability" icon.
- Until this release, if user carried out the availability check for an item of a stock transport order, the software adopted confirmations as per the desired date/time only.
u2022 Two settings are possible with availability check:
- Confirmation as per desired date/time (this is the standard setting and corresponds to previous software behavior)
- Delivery proposal - Full confirmation
External services: putting service items in the purchase order on hold (changed)
User can put purchase orders with service items on hold if these items do not contain any errors. Purchase orders with service items can also be put on hold if errors occur only at header level or as a result of the availability check.
Customizing transactions OX18 replaced by view
The assigned customizing transactions have been replaced by the following view in the following implementation guide activity in customizing for the enterprise structure: Assign plant to company code: transaction OX18 replaced by view V_T001K_Assign. One will find this activity in the implementation guide under the menu path "Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Logistics General -> Assign Plant to Company Code."
Goods receipt: new movement types in inventory management
The following new movement types are available in inventory management:
- 107: Goods receipt to valuated goods receipt blocked stock
- 109: Goods receipt from valuated goods receipt blocked stock
Prepayment of invoices
This functionality is characterized as follows:
u2022 User can trigger prepayment of vendor invoices in logistics invoice verification.
u2022 User use the prepayment function for vendors with whom organisation has a good, long-standing relationship.
u2022 The function enables payment soon after issue of the invoice and full exploitation of the date of required payment and existing cash discounts, by posting the vendor liabilities, taxes, and cash discounts in financial accounting in advance.
u2022 The software executes the payment of the invoice regardless of the relevant goods receipt and the outcome of the invoice verification check.
u2022 Most logistics invoice verification standard functions are not affected by the prepayment function.
u2022 When the software posts invoices, it continues to execute the standard checks.
u2022 If the software has already posted the prepayment document, user can make only restricted changes to the header fields of the invoice.
u2022 To ensure adequate and orderly financial accounting postings, a prepayment clearing account has been added to SAP ERP Central Component.
u2022 Upon prepayment, the software debits this account and then settles the account again after executing the check.
Purchasing accounting information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse
u2022 With the transfer of the purchasing account information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse component (whose functionality is now part of SAP Net Weaver), it is now possible to maintain Info Cubes, reports, and queries that can determine how and where the costs from purchasing documents have been assigned and controlled.
u2022 As part of the software, a new data source (2LIS_02_ACC) has been created and the purchasing extraction process extended to cover the account information for purchasing orders, schedule agreements, and contracts.
Automatic settlement of planned delivery costs with evaluated receipt settlement (MRDC)
u2022 A new report (RMMR1MDC), available within the logistics invoice verification, can be used to automatically settle planned delivery costs.
u2022 To invoke the report, from the SAP easy access screen, choose the menu path "Logistics -> Materials Management -> Logistics Invoice Verification -> Automatic Settlement -> Automatic Delivery Cost Settlement" (transaction code MRDC).
u2022 Functionality for report RMMR1MRS is enhanced.
u2022 User can use the report RMMR1MRS, "Evaluated receipt settlement with logistics invoice verification (LIV)" (transaction code MRRL), to settle planned delivery costs in addition to goods and service items within logistics invoice verification.
u2022 To do so, set the relevant indicator on the initial screen of the report.
Parking service items
It is now possible to put service orders without errors or with commitment errors on hold.
Report MB5B : Stock on Posting Date
u2022 This Report is available with u201CNon-Hierarchyu201D display option which provides details of Opening, Receipt, Issue and Closing balances of Stock with quantity and value both for a given period.
u2022 This functionality is not available in Release 4.7.
Stock Transfer Between Storage Locations
u2022 Function of stock transport orders between storage locations is available from ECC 6.0 onwards.
u2022 As a result of which user can input issuing storage location with supplying plant.
u2022 Facility of using different delivery types for different issuing storage locations is available.
u2022 Shipping Point data can also be determined based on the issuing storage location

The Question about stock transfer between HU-Management and WM-Management

Hi,
There is a scenario about stock transfer between HU-Management and WM-Management storage location. I use transaction MB1B , movement type 313 , 315. After Good issue from WM-management storage location, outbound delivery will genarated, then Pack, Create/Confirm TO, at last post goods issue for the outboud delivery. But when i do movement type 315, there is a warning message "Data of preceding document was not transmitted", and from the F1 help i find this system reponse "You can maintain an indicator that makes information about preceding documents in this delivery available under delivery type in Customizing. For some characteristics of this indicator, the type of preceding document and the related document and item numbers must be transmitted to delivery creation. At least one of these parameters is missing.".
So, My questions are:
1. Generallily, Outbound delivery is created by SO, inbound delivery is created referenc PO, but how the stock transfer for 2 steps generate the outbould delivery and inbound delivery? Could you pls tell me the where i can config this in the IMG?
2. What's "Data of preceding document was not transmitted" mean ? how to fix this issue ?
Best Regards
Boxer Du
I am the SAP fans, focus on MM and WM. I am interesting TRM Yard Management and Cross Docking now.Very Gladly to talk you about these areas. I want to exchange the knowledge with you, and want to be a good friend of you. Pls contact me. You can find My MSN in the profile. Thanks.

Hi,
Sure, The inbound delivery type is set up in the IMG->Logistics General -> HU management -> Basics ->Delivery type -> Delivery type determination.
For Inbound delivery type 'HID' is maintained in this view.
Best Regards.
Some One want to discuss the details , can contact me. Thanks.

Colour disparity between LR4.1 and Elements

Hi all.
I am new to Adobe and the printing of my digital images (using a third party lab).
Pictures I take are in RAW and I only use LR4.1 for post production before exporting images in JPEG and colour space sRGB. I am seeing a visible change on the same monitor between LR4.1 and Adobe Elements 6.0. I should point out the image I like is show in Elements 6.0 or other microsoft (colour managed) application.
Upon having some of the images printed I am seeing a close resemblance to what is in LR4.1 but the B&W images all seem to have this brown tint to them rather than the pure B&W I would expect as shown in Elements or other colour manged application.
On occasions the 'Detail' preview pain also shows the image in the B&W I would expect to see rather than the larger image displayed or that shown under the 'navigator' menu.
I should also point out that on the same monitor (Dell 2208WFP) the colour pictures are near as perfect.
Does anyone have any ideas?
Thank you for your time.
Message was edited by: Danno2013

You have a corrupted monitor profile. You can confirm it using these instructions: http://www.lightroomqueen.com/2008/12/28/corrupted-monitor-profile/ but that's only a temporary fix - you then need to calibrate the monitor properly.

Using a KVM switch between the Mini and a PC

I've just bought a Mini to try out the whole Mac experience.
I'm having trouble getting a KVM switch to work with the Mac.
I have a Tripp Lite B034-002-R KVM switch to share between the Mini and my WinXP PC. The switch changes over to the other computer when you press NUM LOCK twice within 2 seconds. This is working in the PC (i.e. switching from the PC to the Mac is fine) but is not working in the Mac (i.e. the switch doesn't change from the Mac to the PC).
I have a MS "Natural Keyboard Pro" USB keyboard.
Is the NUM LOCK key somehow disabled or something on the Mac? I'm hoping there's some knob I can turn to get this working.
Thanks for your help,
Tom

I bought an IOGEAR GCS632U KVM switch to move between my Mini and Windows XP Pro PC. The keyboard is an Apple Pro. The switch was perfect for several days, then every attempt at invoking the hot key mode would fail; resetting the switch would not correct the problem. IOGEAR Support had me try another keyboard, which is the current standard Apple wired keyboard (the $30 one); it had the same problem as the Pro keyboard. Also we tried other things, but all failed. Sent the KVM switch to IOGEAR and they sent me a new one. After two days using the new switch, the keyboard malfunctioned; this time it was the backward delete key that failed. Same problem using other Apple keyboard. IOGEAR Support, after going through the same previous routine in which nothing succeeded in correcting the problem, tells me to return the switch and they will send me another. Based on my experience, apparently the GCS632U model has an incompatibility problem with (some?) Apple keyboards. This is confirmed by two posts on other discussion groups sites. Also, IOGEAR Support would almost admit that to be the case. They suggested that I use a generic keyboard, but I refuse to buy one just to use that KVM switch. IOGEAR should post the potential problem on their website as a warning.
Does anyone out there know from experience that a particular IOGEAR model does work with an Apple keyboard? IOGEAR Support says that they will send me a different model if I pay the difference. Or can anyone give me the brand name and model number of any KVM switch known to be compatible with Apple keyboards (particularly one that costs less thatn $75)? A ConnectPro 2-port USB KVM switch will work, according to another discussion group post. Any advice or information will be much appreciated.

SNC between SAP BO and SAP BW for MS Advanced Analysis

Hy experts, i have configured the SNC between SAP BO and SAP BW but for any user i have this issue:
when the user launch a Bex Query by MS Advanced Analysis, this error message occurs:
No applicable data found.
On the SAP BW system, on ST22 there is this runtime error:
CALL_FUNCTION_SEND_ERROR.
An error occurred when executing a Remote Function Call.
"SNCERR_INVALID_FRAME#A received frame is invalid/truncated or is no SNC-frame"
What happened?
"CPIC-CALL: 'ThCMSEND' : cmRc=6 thRc=766#General SNC error "
An error occurred when executing a Remote Function Call.
An error occurred when executing a Remote Function Call.
"CPIC-CALL: 'ThCMSEND' : cmRc=6 thRc=766#General SNC error "
Status of connection.... "CODE=CM_SECURITY_NOT_VALID CM_SEND_RECEIVED
CM_COMPLETE_DATA_RECEIVED SAPCODE=766 CONV=91584639"
Internal error code.... "RFC_IO5"
There is an error in the communication system. To clarify
and resolve the error, contact your system administrator.
Last error logged in SAP kernel
Component............ "SNC (Secure Network Communication)"
Place................ "CPIC (TCP/IP) on host ANDREA_13"
Version.............. 5
Error code........... "-12"
Error text........... "SNCERR_INVALID_FRAME#A received frame is
invalid/truncated or is no SNC-frame"
Description.......... "SncProcessInput"
System call.......... " "
Module............... "sncxx.c"
Line................. " "
The error reported by the operating system is:
Error number..... " "
Error text....... " "
User and Transaction
Client.............. 100
User................ 00000015
Language Key........ "E"
Transaction......... " "
Transactions ID..... "6A3E22E031EEF13395AE0019BBCB620C"
Program............. "SAPLRSBOLAP_BICS_PROVIDER"
Screen.............. "SAPMSSY1 3004"
Screen Line......... 2
Information on caller of Remote Function Call (RFC):
System.............. "########"
Database Release.... 720
Kernel Release...... 720
Connection Type..... "E" (2=R/2, 3=ABAP System, E=Ext., R=Reg. Ext.)
Call Type........... "synchron and non-transactional (emode 0, imode 0)"
Inbound TID.........." "
Inbound Queue Name..." "
Outbound TID........." "
Outbound Queue Name.." "
Client.............. "###"
User................ "############"
Transaction......... " "
Call Program........."C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office1"
Function Module..... "BICS_PROV_GET_INITIAL_STATE"
Call Destination.... "GBP_boe_Default"
Source Server....... "ANDREA_13"
Source IP Address... "10.101.3.80"
Additional information on RFC logon:
Trusted Relationship " "
Logon Return Code... 0
Trusted Return Code. 0
Note: For releases < 4.0, information on the RFC caller are often
only partially available.
Information on where terminated
Termination occurred in the ABAP program "SAPLRSBOLAP_BICS_PROVIDER" - in
"BICS_PROV_GET_INITIAL_STATE".
The main program was "SAPMSSY1 ".
In the source code you have the termination point in line 1
of the (Include) program "LRSBOLAP_BICS_PROVIDERU13".
Could you help me?
Thank's a lot and best regards.
Andrea Maraviglia

Ciao Andrea,
just a couple of hints:
- Did you already tried to skip logon to BOE and instead directly select BW system? this should avoid to involve snc and then BEx query should be accessible. This would be a further confirmation that issue is the SNC, even if the log you posted is pretty clear about that.
- Do you have snc installed even in local PC running MS Advanced Analysis? I Think it is necessary for the described workflow (page 24 of Admin Guide):
"With SAP BusinessObjects Enterprise as the BI platform, single sign-on works if the following conditions
are true:
u2022 BusinessObjects Enterprise XI 3.1 is configured correctly for single sign-on. For more information,
see u201CConfiguring SAP authenticationu201D in the Integration for SAP Solutions Install and Admin Guide
at http://service.sap.com/bosap-instguides SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence (BI) >
Integration for SAP Solutions > XI 3.1.
u2022 Secure Network Communications (SNC) is installed on each client PC. For more information, see
SAP Help Portal at http://help.sap.com SAP NetWeaver > SAP NetWeaver Library > SAP
NetWeaver by Key Capability > Security > Network and Transport Layer Security > Secure
Network Communications.
u2022 Each end user has a user account in the connected BW system."
Furthermore, if I rember correctly, there could be restriction in license using SAP Cryptographic Library (client connection is not supported: SAP notes 597059 and 397195), so you should check your SNC software.
Hope it could hep.
Regards.
Roberto.

Diff between ECC5.0 and ECC6.0

Hi,
This is Ramakrishna,can any one give proper explanation diff between ECC5.0 and ECC6.0
Regards
Ramakrishna

Hi,
Refer following link;
[SAP ERP Solution Browser|http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/]
Following are the basic differences as far as MM Module is concerned;
Pickup list - Batch where-used list display in transaction MB56
u2022 Until release 4.7, the top-down and bottom-up analyses in the function pickup list for batch where-used list (transaction MB5C) were displayed only in the form of simple output lists. As of release 6.00 of SAP ERP Central Component, the function pickup list for batch where-used list branches to the batch where-used list itself (transaction MB56).
u2022 In addition, user can define how the data in the batch where-used list is displayed, in the initial screen.
u2022 User can use all the settings available in the batch where-used list. For example, he can expand transfer posting or display vendor batch. However, it is not possible to limit the selection to valid plants in the initial screen of the pickup list.
Usability enhancements for transaction MIGO for the posting of goods movements
u2022 For goods movements that refer to purchase orders as reference documents (for example, goods receipt, goods issue, subsequent adjustment), user can specify the ordering plant as an additional selection criterion directly next to the purchase order number and the item number.
u2022 There is a new default value: "copy account assignment fields." When entering other goods receipts, user can copy existing account assignment data from the previous item to use as the default values for a new item. To do this, user has to set the copy account assignment fields indicator in the default values.
u2022 User changes the default values in the menu path "Settings -> Default Values."
u2022 Goods movement is monitored with reference to a material document. When you enter the following goods movements, it is possible to specify a material document, such as the following, as the reference document:
- Goods receipt
- Goods issue
- Transfer posting
- Remove from storage
u2022 Note that these material documents must be documents that have arisen from a goods movement without reference ("Others") and that are not reversal documents.
New report : display list of invoice documents (MIR5)
u2022 Logistics invoice verification offers a new report display list of invoice documents (RMMR1MDI), w hich user can use to display such a list (Transaction is MIR5).
u2022 As an addition to the existing program invoice overview (transaction code MIR6), user have extended selection criteria and display options. For example, on the initial screen user can make selections by one-time customers, invoice gross amount, and entry date.
u2022 User can also show an expert mode, which enables him to select at plant level by FI document, GL A/c posting, and Material Posting.
u2022 In the output list, the report shows both posted and held invoices.
u2022 It does not show invoices without a corresponding FI document; such as invoices planned for verification in the background or which the software has already verified as containing errors.
Requirement prioritizations in materials management
u2022 With Requirement Prioritization functionality user can assign requirement urgency at item level in purchasing and reservation documents.
u2022 The software determines the relevant requirement priority (overall priority) of a material requisition from the combination of requirement urgency group and organizational priority.
Mass maintenance of outline agreements
The following two transactions available:
u2022 Mass maintenance for contracts: transaction code MEMASSCONTRACT
u2022 Mass maintenance for scheduling agreements: transaction code MEMASSSA
Commitment plan for purchase contracts
u2022 With the function of the commitment plan for purchase contracts, it is possible to pre plan value consumption for a purchase contract.
u2022 To this end, a commitment plan is generated for each document item of the relevant contract.
u2022 This commitment plan itself can have any number of items.
u2022 User can define a value and a validity date for each commitment plan item.
u2022 This enables user to pre plan different values for different periods of time.
u2022 The software generates an earmarked fund document for a defined commitment plan item.
u2022 This earmarked funds document can in turn contain several different items with different account assignments.
u2022 The software adopts these account assignments from the item account assignments of the commitment plan.
u2022 If a purchase requisition or purchase order references this contract, the earmarked funds document is copied into the purchase order, and the account assignment is adopted from that document.
u2022 Account assignment to a different account assignment object is then no longer allowed.
Availability check in "Enjoy purchase order and requisition"
u2022 Display and checking of availability are invokable separately in the "Enjoy purchase order and requisition" function, in line with the software behavior on the sales side.
u2022 User invoke the display and checking of availability in the "Enjoy purchase order" function (transaction code ME21N) and the "Enjoy purchase requisition" function (transaction code ME51N) as follows:
- To display the availability overview, choose the menu path "Environment -> Availability." - To check availability, choose the "Check Availability" icon.
- Until this release, if user carried out the availability check for an item of a stock transport order, the software adopted confirmations as per the desired date/time only.
u2022 Two settings are possible with availability check:
- Confirmation as per desired date/time (this is the standard setting and corresponds to previous software behavior)
- Delivery proposal - Full confirmation
External services: putting service items in the purchase order on hold (changed)
User can put purchase orders with service items on hold if these items do not contain any errors. Purchase orders with service items can also be put on hold if errors occur only at header level or as a result of the availability check.
Customizing transactions OX18 replaced by view
The assigned customizing transactions have been replaced by the following view in the following implementation guide activity in customizing for the enterprise structure: Assign plant to company code: transaction OX18 replaced by view V_T001K_Assign. One will find this activity in the implementation guide under the menu path "Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Logistics General -> Assign Plant to Company Code."
Goods receipt: new movement types in inventory management
The following new movement types are available in inventory management:
- 107: Goods receipt to valuated goods receipt blocked stock
- 109: Goods receipt from valuated goods receipt blocked stock
Prepayment of invoices
This functionality is characterized as follows:
u2022 User can trigger prepayment of vendor invoices in logistics invoice verification.
u2022 User use the prepayment function for vendors with whom organisation has a good, long-standing relationship.
u2022 The function enables payment soon after issue of the invoice and full exploitation of the date of required payment and existing cash discounts, by posting the vendor liabilities, taxes, and cash discounts in financial accounting in advance.
u2022 The software executes the payment of the invoice regardless of the relevant goods receipt and the outcome of the invoice verification check.
u2022 Most logistics invoice verification standard functions are not affected by the prepayment function.
u2022 When the software posts invoices, it continues to execute the standard checks.
u2022 If the software has already posted the prepayment document, user can make only restricted changes to the header fields of the invoice.
u2022 To ensure adequate and orderly financial accounting postings, a prepayment clearing account has been added to SAP ERP Central Component.
u2022 Upon prepayment, the software debits this account and then settles the account again after executing the check.
Purchasing accounting information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse
u2022 With the transfer of the purchasing account information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse component (whose functionality is now part of SAP Net Weaver), it is now possible to maintain Info Cubes, reports, and queries that can determine how and where the costs from purchasing documents have been assigned and controlled.
u2022 As part of the software, a new data source (2LIS_02_ACC) has been created and the purchasing extraction process extended to cover the account information for purchasing orders, schedule agreements, and contracts.
Automatic settlement of planned delivery costs with evaluated receipt settlement (MRDC)
u2022 A new report (RMMR1MDC), available within the logistics invoice verification, can be used to automatically settle planned delivery costs.
u2022 To invoke the report, from the SAP easy access screen, choose the menu path "Logistics -> Materials Management -> Logistics Invoice Verification -> Automatic Settlement -> Automatic Delivery Cost Settlement" (transaction code MRDC).
u2022 Functionality for report RMMR1MRS is enhanced.
u2022 User can use the report RMMR1MRS, "Evaluated receipt settlement with logistics invoice verification (LIV)" (transaction code MRRL), to settle planned delivery costs in addition to goods and service items within logistics invoice verification.
u2022 To do so, set the relevant indicator on the initial screen of the report.
Parking service items
It is now possible to put service orders without errors or with commitment errors on hold.
Report MB5B : Stock on Posting Date
u2022 This Report is available with u201CNon-Hierarchyu201D display option which provides details of Opening, Receipt, Issue and Closing balances of Stock with quantity and value both for a given period.
u2022 This functionality is not available in Release 4.7.
Stock Transfer Between Storage Locations
u2022 Function of stock transport orders between storage locations is available from ECC 6.0 onwards.
u2022 As a result of which user can input issuing storage location with supplying plant.
u2022 Facility of using different delivery types for different issuing storage locations is available.
u2022 Shipping Point data can also be determined based on the issuing storage location

Posting differeences between GR qty and TO confirmation qty

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for