Posting from WinXP64, the definitive thread
Greetings.
Posting from Windows XP 64 bits here.
It's kind a useless at the moment. I have no sound, my printer doesn't have any drivers, HP DeskJ. 5550 and ATi doesn't have OpenGL support in the drivers that ship with the XP64 install. Direct X is almost as fast tho as Winxp 32bit.
Any one feel that the Explorer is MUCH MUCH more smoother and more responsive and the system barely touches the hard drives in browsing mode?
Everything is just super responsive and the boot time is shorter too.
Regards,
Simon
...YAY...thanks Bas...got sound...here...
...tip...download and unzip in a Windows 32-bit OS...XP 64-Bit doesn't recognize zip and has no right-click option to extract...might just be me ...
...getting a few pop-behind ads...???...
...I visit a forum that uses Flash and the Macromedia install notice showed up everytime I went to a new page until I checked the "Alway Trust Macromedia" box and clicked Install...heh heh...
...Paint Shop Pro 8 locked up once but Task Manager got me out of it...
...one odd thing...when I start up Windows loads and I get the desktop but then My Computer opens to the F-drive Program Files (XP 64-Bit) page...???...everytime...
...'nuff said...
Similar Messages
-
Does a reentrant dll call monopolize the calling thread?
If I understand thing correctly, threading for a dll call is the same as threading for a vi whose execution priority is set to subroutine.
To review threading in subvis:
(1) the thread in which a subroutine-execution-priorty-vi call is made is monopolized by the subroutine-execution-priorty-vi since labview cannot time slice the thread.
(2) if the subroutine-execution-priority-vi is not reentrant, then other threads that call the vi may be suspended because they are competing for the same code resource.
(3) if the subroutine-execution-priority-vi is reentrant, then other threads may call the vi simultaneously. However, within any particular thread the vi must complete because of point (1).
In
sum, the OS timeslices between the threads, and labVIEW timeslices within the threads. If a vi's execution priority is set to subroutine, then the thread under which it is running is monopolized by the vi. Yes?
A reentrant dll call would be equivalent to a reentrant subvi call in which the subvi's execution priority is set to subroutine. Yes?
If the above is correct then this should also be correct:
Using an API call to return the thread ID, you could use the the thread ID at the front and back side of a dll call, as well as in a message library function callable from a dll, to theoretically message labVIEW upon the dll return. The message would be uniquely identifiable because a dll call cannot be superceded by another dll call from within the same thread. Yes?
I'm not saying that it would be particularly efficient to do so, only that it could be done. And depending on the messaging, it could be a useful option in the dll call configuration dialog box.
In consider
ation of "magic",
Kind Regards,
EricEric,
I'm not sure I understand exactlly what you are trying to do here.
If you want LV to react to a dll error, why don't you just pass a return
code that's not zero? Then, back in LV, read the return code. If it's not
zero, create an error, and pass this to the rest of the code. The rest of
the code is (or should, following good programming practise) has an error
in, and the code will not execute if the input error is TRUE. It does not
even have to be the return code, it could be any input value. The input
values can be changed in the code, and the modified value is returnd to
LabVIEW.
If you want to generate an error, and put it into a buffer to be read later
on in LV, you'll have to synchronise the code. This is the consequence for a
construction like this, and is the same for several windows API's
(GetLastError, etc.). the buffer will stay in memory, untill all instances
of the dll are released from LV memory.
BTW: A dll could create another thread. This thread can run on the
background, like the good old TRS's in dos. (A thread like this could even
call a LabVIEW VI that is build in a dll, just like any other api.)
BTW: A thread created by a dll can be made to be automatically released when
the thread is detatched, or when the process is detached. This is important,
because LV will crash if the dll is removed from memory, but the thread is
not stopped properly.
Regards,
Wiebe.
"Eric6756" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Greg,
>
> As I think I lost you in the point of this line of questions, let me
> back up.
>
> A couple of week ago I asked the following question, "Is there a
> labVIEW library call that can be made from a dll to tell labVIEW to
> abort the calling vi thread?" To that question you made the following
> statement:
>
> "... and I doubt that there is a function to do that from a DLL as the
> DLL could be arbitrarily deep down the stack and the function called
> would have to magically find the VI that it wants to abort. And don't
> forget that DLLs can be called by multiple VIs at the same time."
>
> You seem to be saying here that what I'm asking for is not possible.
> And having thought about this for a while, I didn't understand why
> not.
>
> For the moment I'm going to ignore the caveat you just put into the
> dll calling presumptions I've made and assume the dll is going to
> execute synchronously within a thread. As the original question
> suggests, the objective here is to message labVIEW from a dll to
> provide the same functionallity as a CIN, namely return an error code
> to labVIEW from a dll.
>
> A library function could do this as follows:
>
> First, the library function would have two modes; set error, and
> return error
>
> (1) set error:
>
> 1.1 get the set error caller thread ID from API
> 1.2 get the passed in error
> 1.3 store the error and associated thread ID locally
>
> (2) return error
> 2.1 get return error caller thread ID from API
> 2.2 locate the error, if any, associated with thread ID
> 2.3 return the error and clear it locally
>
> Now, if a dll encountered an error that it wanted labview to deal
> with, it would call the error function to set the error code. When
> the dll call returns control to labVIEW, labVIEW could call the
> function to return the error. This of course works only if the dll
> call is synchronous within a thread. Obviously, if the dll releases
> the thread before it returns, then more than one dll call can be made
> from the thread and the presumption that an error could be uniquely
> associated with a thread is itself an error.
>
> Having looked at your reply again, I think though your answering a
> different question than I asked. I just wanted a function to message
> labVIEW to abort the vi chain, I don't want to abort a vi chain from
> within the dll. It is a feature of CIN calls which I wanted in dll
> calls.
>
> That a dll call may not be synchronous within a thread throws a wrench
> in the works. Apparently I've just chased down a dead end.
>
> Hey, but thanks for the wrench...
> Kind Regards,
> Eric -
Creating Poster from File function causes all graphics files to distort.
Sorry for the long subject title, didn't know how to pare it down...
What's happening is when I add 3D content in Acrobat 3D V8 I select the option in the Poster Image window to "Creat poster from file", the graphic ALWAYS rotates the image and often distorts it as well.
Any fix for this?
Jeff PerkinsI don't get this error. I've tried both JPG and BMP files, and both work. Hmmm...maybe it's due to the aspect ratio. Try at least matching the layout (portrait/landscape) between the 3D annot and the graphic file.
-
I have a new iphone and cannot delete the backup from icloud. It says that it is in use. I have read some of the other threads and it only seems to be haphazard solutions. Is there a definite way to fix this? I am not able to change icloud accounts.
Follow the steps in wjosten's post here: https://discussions.apple.com/message/13356770#13356770 (for Windows, substitute Outlook in step 2).
-
Why can't I interrupt the main thread from a child thread with this code?
I am trying to find an elegant way for a child thread (spawned from a main thread) to stop what its doing and tell the main thread something went wrong. I thought that if I invoke mainThread.interrupt() from the child thread by giving the child thread a reference to the main thread, that would do the trick. But it doesn't work all the time. I want to know why. Here's my code below:
The main class:
* IF YOU RUN THIS OFTEN ENOUGH, YOU'LL NOTICE THE "Child Please!" MESSAGE NOT SHOW AT SOME POINT. WHY?
public class InterruptingParentFromChildThread
public static void main( String args[] )
Thread child = new Thread( new ChildThread( Thread.currentThread() ) );
child.start();
try
child.join();
catch( InterruptedException e )
// THE LINE BELOW DOESN'T GET PRINTED EVERY SINGLE TIME ALTHOUGH IT WORKS MOST TIMES, WHY?
System.out.println( "Child please!" );
System.out.println( "ALL DONE!" );
The class for the child thread:
public class ChildThread implements Runnable
Thread mParent;
public ChildThread( Thread inParent )
mParent = inParent;
public void run()
System.out.println( "In child thread." );
System.out.println( "Let's interrupt the parent thread now." );
// THE COMMENTED OUT LINE BELOW, IF UNCOMMENTED, DOESN'T INVOKE InterruptedException THAT CAN BE CAUGHT IN THE MAIN CLASS' CATCH BLOCK, WHY?
//Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
// THIS LINE BELOW ONLY WORKS SOMETIMES, WHY?
mParent.interrupt();
}EJP wrote:
I'm not convinced about that. The wording in join() suggests that, but the wording in interrupt() definitely does not.Thread.join() doesn't really provide much in the way of details, but Object.wait() does:
"throws InterruptedException - if any thread interrupted the current thread +before+ or while the current thread was waiting for a notification. The interrupted status of the current thread is cleared when this exception is thrown."
every jdk method i've used which throws InterruptedException will always throw if entered while a thread is currently interrupted. admitted, i rarely use Thread.join(), so it's possible that method could be different. however, that makes the thread interruption far less useful if it's required to hit the thread while it's already paused.
a simple test with Thread.sleep() confirms my expected behavior (sleep will throw):
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
Thread.sleep(1000L); -
Mail sorting messages from different people in the same thread?
I have this weird issue. It's happened before but I figured I might be able to figure this out.
I got a response from somebody this morning and whats happening is, when I click on his response, the email shows up on the right like it should. However, ths email is from "Floyd" and shows as email "2". It shows another email below it in the "thread" from "Taryn" and has absolutely nothing to do with this email. The only similarities are the subject line which says "Poster". The "First" email from Taryn is from April. It seams as if it's sorting the emails by subject line. I don't want emails from different people in the same thread. Any thoughts on how to fix this issue? Image attached.
OSX 10.8.4This question is about the same as mine. I migrated all my data from old mac mini to new mac mini. System screwed up and permission and owners were not setup. Now I'm trying to salvage this mess. I'm also trying to import mail, which I think should be on the computer but I don't know where.
Same question where does the computer store Mail mail?
Chuck -
Small request regarding quoting posts in the screenshots thread
I have a small request for all of you who regularly reply to posts in the screenshots thread - when you quote someone, could you please ensure that the link that shows up in the quoted post is to the full image, and not the thumbnail? It defaults to the thumbnail, and that's very annoying, as you then have to hunt through the previous posts until you find the one that's being referenced, which is sometimes pages back.
Thanks!
Last edited by CosineQuaNon (2010-06-17 00:16:15)rb wrote:
CosineQuaNon wrote:There are still people using ImageShack! I don't understand what's so difficult about using omploader or imgur instead, particularly when there's a command line tool for omploading.
May I ask what's wrong with Imageshack? (an honest question!)
The links to the images are longer, and there isn't an officially sanctioned command line upload tool.
However, what gets to me the most is when people use the "forum code" provided by ImageShack. When you click on the thumbnail, instead of taking you directly to the image, you go to an intermediate page, from which you have to click again to get to the image itself. Here is a perfect example.
Edit: arinlares fixed his post (thanks!), so here are some other examples:
These are from ImageBam:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … 60#p785560
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … 86#p785586
This from deviantART: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … 14#p785414 (deviantART is a little more understable, since he's linking to his personal page, but since he's got a link to it in his sig, that seems a little redundant).
As you can see, the same sort of issue.
Last edited by w1ntermute (2010-07-04 07:01:54) -
How can I kill all Threads of the same class from within the run() method?
Ok
I have a class called Consumer that extends Thread
I have several Consumer threans running... but, when a certain condition is true (within the run() method) in ANY of the threads, I want to kill ALL the threads of that object.
is this possible?I know this is gonna be too demanding, but can someone please tell me why my Consumer's run() method never reaches the System.out.println( "ALL CONSUMING DONE") line
Create a multi-threaded prime number calculator that is based on the producer-consumer model
using semaphores. Your program should be able to check for prime numbers in a range specified
by the user and with a variable number of threads. Example:
$ java PrimeFind 3 5000 10000
should use 1 producer and 2 consumers (3 threads in total, obviously the minimum is 2) to find all
the prime numbers in the range [5000,10000].
The producer should: use a buffer to store candidate numbers that have to be checked for
primality.
Consumers should: read from the buffer, check if a number is prime and update the status of the
program accordingly (e.g. show the number on the screen, or save it to a file)
import java.util.concurrent.Semaphore;
import java.io.*;
public class Assign1 {
static int fromThisNumber;
static int toThisNumber;
static int numberOfThreads;
static int buffer[];
static Semaphore ready; /*This semaphore is used by the Producer to signal
an "OK" to the consumers*/
static Semaphore critical; /*This is a Mutex semaphore. It allows only 1 consumer
to enter his critical section.
static Semaphore counter; /*This semaphore acts as a counter.
Instead of having a global variable
incremented each time, we just release()
this semephore when we find a prime number
Because remember that release() increments permits
static Producer prod;
static Consumer cons[];
static int in=0;
static int out=0;
static PrintWriter outFile;
public static void main (String args[]){
try{
outFile=new PrintWriter(new FileWriter("primes.txt"));
}catch(Exception e){}
numberOfThreads=Integer.parseInt(args[0]);
fromThisNumber=Integer.parseInt(args[1]);
toThisNumber=Integer.parseInt(args[2]);
buffer=new int[Integer.parseInt(args[2])-Integer.parseInt(args[1])+1];
ready=new Semaphore(0,false); /*We initialise it to 0 because we wait
for the Producer to produce atleast a
item. Suppose ready was 1 and if
Consumer ran first he would be in an
empty buffer */
critical=new Semaphore (1,false);/*We initialise it to 1 because when
the first Consumer thread tries
to enter its critical section, it
should be allowed to;
Subsequent threads will have to
wait since only 1 thread can
access its critical section at a time*/
counter=new Semaphore(0,false); // duh!
cons=new Consumer[numberOfThreads-1]; /*numberOfThreads-1 because 1 thread
is taken by the Producer*/
//Creating Producer object
prod=new Producer();
//Creating the Consumer object and start the thread.
for(int i=0;i<cons.length;i++)
cons=new Consumer();
cons[i].start();
prod.start();
//Printing to screen and file
/* for(int i=0;i<buffer.length;i++)
if(buffer[i]!=0)
System.out.println(buffer[i]);
outFile.println(buffer[i]);
System.out.println("Total primes found between "+args[1]+" and "+toThisNumber+": "+counter.availablePermits()+"\n primes.txt written");
outFile.println("Total primes found between "+args[1]+" and "+toThisNumber+": "+counter.availablePermits());
outFile.close();*/
static class Producer extends Thread {
public void run(){try{
while(in<buffer.length) /*'in' should always be more than 'out'.Oherwise the consumer will try to access an empty index*/
{ System.out.println("producing");
buffer[in]=fromThisNumber;
in++;
fromThisNumber++;
ready.release();
catch (Exception e){e.printStackTrace();}
System.out.println("ALL PRODUCING DONE");
static class Consumer extends Thread {
int tempout=0;
public void run(){try{
System.out.println("before while"+this.getId());
while(tempout<=in)
System.out.println("before ready"+this.getId()+" "+ready.availablePermits()+" "+in);
ready.acquire();
System.out.println("before critical.acquire"+this.getId());
critical.acquire();
tempout=out;
out++;
critical.release();
if(!isPrime(buffer[tempout]))
{System.out.println(buffer[tempout]+" by "+this.getId());buffer[tempout]=0;}
else {counter.release();System.out.println("prime added: "+buffer[tempout]+" by "+this.getId());}
critical.acquire();
tempout=out;
System.out.println("tempout:"+tempout+" of "+this.getId());
critical.release();
System.out.println("ALL CONSUMING DONE"+this.getId());
catch(Exception e){e.printStackTrace();}
//Prime number-checking method
public boolean isPrime(int n){
for(int i=2;i<=(n/2);i++)
if(n%i==0)
return false;
return true;
======================
import java.util.concurrent.Semaphore;
import java.io.*;
/* 3 questions to ask Barlas
* Why error if I start the Consumer threads before Producer
* Why does the counter semaphore always give a +1 result at the end
* Is there a way I can verify that all the work is not being done by only 1 consumer thread? In other words, the workload is being shared properly
* if I put ready.acquire() outside or inside the while loop, its not making any difference, why?
* Strangely, its not making any difference if I playing with the release() and aquire() of the semaphores, WHY?!?!
public class Assign1 {
static int fromThisNumber;
static int toThisNumber;
static int numberOfThreads;
static int buffer[];
static Semaphore ready; /*This semaphore is used by the Producer to signal
an "OK" to the consumers*/
static Semaphore critical; /*This is a Mutex semaphore. It allows only 1 consumer
to enter his critical section.
static Semaphore counter; /*This semaphore acts as a counter.
Instead of having a global variable
incremented each time, we just release()
this semephore when we find a prime number
Because remember that release() increments permits
static Producer prod;
static Consumer cons[];
static int in=0;
static int out=0;
static PrintWriter outFile;
public static void main (String args[]){
try{
outFile=new PrintWriter(new FileWriter("primes.txt"));
}catch(Exception e){}
numberOfThreads=Integer.parseInt(args[0]);
fromThisNumber=Integer.parseInt(args[1]);
toThisNumber=Integer.parseInt(args[2]);
buffer=new int[Integer.parseInt(args[2])-Integer.parseInt(args[1])+1];
ready=new Semaphore(0,false); /*We initialise it to 0 because we wait
for the Producer to produce atleast a
item. Suppose ready was 1 and if
Consumer ran first he would be in an
empty buffer */
critical=new Semaphore (1,false);/*We initialise it to 1 because when
the first Consumer thread tries
to enter its critical section, it
should be allowed to;
Subsequent threads will have to
wait since only 1 thread can
access its critical section at a time*/
counter=new Semaphore(0,false); // duh!
cons=new Consumer[numberOfThreads-1]; /*numberOfThreads-1 because 1 thread
is taken by the Producer*/
//Creating Producer object
prod=new Producer();
//Creating the Consumer object and start the thread.
for(int i=0;i<cons.length;i++)
cons[i]=new Consumer();
cons[i].start();
prod.start();
//Printing to screen and file
/* for(int i=0;i<buffer.length;i++)
if(buffer[i]!=0)
System.out.println(buffer[i]);
outFile.println(buffer[i]);
System.out.println("Total primes found between "+args[1]+" and "+toThisNumber+": "+counter.availablePermits()+"\n primes.txt written");
outFile.println("Total primes found between "+args[1]+" and "+toThisNumber+": "+counter.availablePermits());
outFile.close();*/
static class Producer extends Thread {
public void run(){try{
while(in<buffer.length) /*'in' should always be more than 'out'.Oherwise the consumer will try to access an empty index*/
{ System.out.println("producing");
buffer[in]=fromThisNumber;
in++;
fromThisNumber++;
ready.release();
catch (Exception e){e.printStackTrace();}
System.out.println("ALL PRODUCING DONE");
static class Consumer extends Thread {
int tempout=0;
public void run(){try{
System.out.println("before while"+this.getId());
while(tempout<=in)
System.out.println("before ready"+this.getId()+" "+ready.availablePermits()+" "+in);
ready.acquire();
System.out.println("before critical.acquire"+this.getId());
critical.acquire();
tempout=out;
out++;
critical.release();
if(!isPrime(buffer[tempout]))
{System.out.println(buffer[tempout]+" by "+this.getId());buffer[tempout]=0;}
else {counter.release();System.out.println("prime added: "+buffer[tempout]+" by "+this.getId());}
critical.acquire();
tempout=out;
System.out.println("tempout:"+tempout+" of "+this.getId());
critical.release();
System.out.println("ALL CONSUMING DONE"+this.getId());
catch(Exception e){e.printStackTrace();}
//Prime number-checking method
public boolean isPrime(int n){
for(int i=2;i<=(n/2);i++)
if(n%i==0)
return false;
return true;
===========================
BTW, when I tried to change extends Thread to implements Runnable I got some kinda of error.
Actually, my program is pretty complete... its just that something if messed up in my Consumer's run() method's while loop... I think
I know guys its crazy to ask ya'll to look at so much code, but.... I'd really appreciate it. This assignment is killing me, been at it since 10 hours now.... -
Is it possible to do manaul posting from FI if the customer blocked
Dear All,
If the customer blocked in all the sales areas, is it possible to do manual posting from FI.
Kindly clarify.
Regards,
Mullairajahi raja,
yes, you are right because even sales area is blocked also you can post in FI
if it is blocked with COMPANY CODE LEVEL, then its a problem
hope this clears your issue
balajia -
Calling a delegate on the UI thread from a work thread inside a child class.
Hi All,
I've run into a snag developing a WPF multithreaded app where I need to call a method on the UI thread from my work thread, where the work thread is running a different class.
Currently I am trying to use a delegate and an event in the 2nd class to call a method in the 1st class on the UI thread. This so far is not working as because the 2nd class is running in its own thread, it causes a runtime error when attempting to call
the event.
I've seen lots of solutions referring to using the dispatcher to solve this by invoking the code, however my work thread is running a different class than my UI thread, so it seems the dispatcher is not available?
Below is as simplified an example as I can make of what I am trying to achieve. Currently the below code results in a "The calling thread cannot access this object because a different thread owns it." exception at runtime.
The XAML side of this just produces a button connected to startThread2_Click() and a label which is then intended to be updated by the 2nd thread calling the updateLabelThreaded() function in the first thread when the button is clicked.
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
using System.Windows.Data;
using System.Windows.Documents;
using System.Windows.Input;
using System.Windows.Media;
using System.Windows.Media.Imaging;
using System.Windows.Navigation;
using System.Windows.Shapes;
using System.Windows.Threading;
using System.Threading;
namespace multithreadtest
public delegate void runInParent();
public partial class MainWindow : Window
public MainWindow()
InitializeComponent();
threadUpdateLabel.Content = "Thread 1";
private void startThread2_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
thread2Class _Thread2 = new thread2Class();
_Thread2.runInParentEvent += new runInParent(updateLabelThreaded);
Thread thread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(_Thread2.threadedTestFunction));
thread.Start();
public void updateLabelThreaded()
threadUpdateLabel.Content = "Thread 2 called me!";
public class thread2Class
public event runInParent runInParentEvent;
public void threadedTestFunction()
if (runInParentEvent != null)
runInParentEvent();
I'm unfortunately not very experienced with c# so I may well be going the complete wrong way about what I'm trying to do. In the larger application I am writing, fundamentally I just need to be able to call a codeblock in the UI thread when I'm in a different
class on another thread (I am updating many different items on the UI thread when the work thread has performed certain steps, so ideally I want to keep as much UI code as possible out of the work thread. The work threads logic is also rather complicated as
I am working with both a webAPI and a MySQL server, so keeping it all in its own class would be ideal)
If a more thorough explanation of what I am trying to achieve would help please let me know.
Any help with either solving the above problem, or suggestions for alternative ways I could get the class in the UI thread to do something when prompted by the 2nd class in the 2nd thread would be appreciated.
Thanks :)If I follow the explanation, I think you can use MVVM Light messenger.
You can install it using NuGet.
Search on mvvm light libraries only.
You right click solution in solution explorer and choose manage nugget...
So long as you're not accessing ui stuff on these other threads.
using GalaSoft.MvvmLight.Messaging;
namespace wpf_Tester
/// <summary>
/// Interaction logic for MainWindow.xaml
/// </summary>
public partial class MainWindow : Window
public MainWindow()
InitializeComponent();
Messenger.Default.Register<String>(this, (action) => ReceiveString(action));
private void ReceiveString(string msg)
MessageBox.Show(msg);
Dispatcher.BeginInvoke((Action)delegate()
tb.Text = msg;
private void Button_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
Task.Factory.StartNew(() => {
Messenger.Default.Send<String>("Hello World");
What the above does is start up a new thread - that startnew does that.
It sends of message of type string which the main window has subscribed to....it gets that and puts up a message box.
The message is sent from the window to the window in that but this will work across any classes in a solution.
Note that the receive acts on whichever thread the message is sent from.
I would usually be altering properties of a viewmodel with such code which have no thread affinity.
If you're then going to directly access properties of ui elements then you need to use Dispatcher.BeginInvoke to get back to the UI thread.
I do that with an anonymous action in that bit of code but you can call a method or whatever instead if your logic is more complicated or you need it to be re-usable.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/26070.aspx
Hope that helps.
Technet articles: Uneventful MVVM;
All my Technet Articles -
How to Block the posting from a Comapny code
hii
any abody please clarify my doubt . I have two comapny codes i.e 1000 and 2000 those are having same chart of accounts and posting period variant and fiscal period . Now i want to block the comapny code 1000. I did so many postings made in comapny code 1000 and 2000 .i dont want to continue the comapny code 1000 so i want to block the comapny code 1000. Now i am using 2000 comapny codes only.
what is the procedure for that my issue solved.
Thanks
sairamayou can do this in a few ways.
One would be to remove Company Code 1000 from all of the authorizations, therefore no one can post to it.
You could block for posting all of the GL accounts in t code MASS.
What do you want to do with the data from CC 1000?
You could look at archiving or speaking to the SAP SLO Consulting team.
Please award points if useful. -
How to hold the main thread, till response is received from the server?
I have a program in which the GUI client(View program in Swings) sends a request to server (Manager program) , and waits for the response from Manager.
The method used is waitForResponse() as follows
<code>
private void waitForResponse()
m_blWaitFlag=true;
//after response from manager m_blWait flag is set to false.
while (m_blWaitFlag)
try
Thread.sleep(500);
}catch(Exception r_ex)
</code>
And in notifyResponse() method, the wait flag is set to false
as in,
<code>
public void notifyResponse(VcvResponse r_objResponse)
m_blWaitFlag = false; //this line makes the thread to come out of the wait mode.
</code>
When I click a menu item, this request is sent and there is a wait for a response from manager.
The problem is , this kind of waiting makes the system slow, and grey patches are seen immediately after clicking a menu item.
Are there other ways of waiting??
Thanks in advanceWhen I click a menu item, this request is sent and there is a wait for a response from manager.This means you are using the GUI thread to send the request.
The problem is , this kind of waiting makes the system slow, and grey patches are seen immediately after clicking a menu item.This means the GUI thread is waiting for the response. No GUI updates can occur while it is waiting.
Are there other ways of waiting??Use another thread. e.g the main as you suggested. If you are using a callback, why do you have a thread waiting at all? WHy not do the things you would do when a response comes back in the call back? -
Where to find old thread/post and closed the thread
where to find old thread/post and closed the thread
i try to search by email id, by userid but no results display at all only new post are shownHi,
where to find old thread/post and closed the thread
i try to search by email id, by userid but no results display at all only new post are shownMake sure that u have specified the Correct date range parameter as required.
Regards,
X A H E E R -
I Note with the iOS8 update when I now delete a msg from a contact thread it still shows up with the time as a recent msg. How do I delete this from recent without deleting the entire thread?
BC
My understanding is that music syncing is a one way process from computer iTunes to your iPhone. I think what you are asking is to have IOS synching back to an OSX or PC system. The software doesn't work that way.
You either have to uncheck the songs to be synced or create a separate playlist for "BC Canada iPhone" and only sync that playlist.
As well any purchases you made on your iPhone need to be transferred to your iTunes so they can come back to your phone when you re-sync.
Hope this helps, even though it's not the answer you might have wanted.
Cheers -
Xchange Rate type changed in the follow on document getting posted from MM
Hi,
There is an issue while the follow on document posts from MM module to FI module.
The rate of exchange captured is M-CL while creation of the Purchase order. On posting the MIGO/ MIRO, the exchange rate type is correct viz M_CL .
But when the follow on document in the FI module is generated, the Exchange rate type is changed to M.
Can any one please tell me as to what can be the possible issue and wht are the configuration details be checked in the system or whether there is any special configuration of the Exchange rate type maintenence at country level and at transaction code level.
Thanks in Advance.
ManishHi Amam,
Have checked in the system the tocdes and the table as mentioned by you.
The issue here is that the system is picking the default M as the exchange rate type defined is blank . I want to specify the exchange rate type for a particular (country chile) for a particular document type.
Is there any setting to set the exchange rate ype at country / company code level for a particular document type .
Thanks in advance
Manish
Maybe you are looking for
-
I need advise and help with this problem . First , I have been with Mac for many years ( 14 to be exact ) I do have some knowledge and understanding of Apple product . At the present time I'm having lots of problems with the router so I was looking i
-
Hi, I got a problem with my Ipod Nano.I used my ipod other than the primary PC used for sync.After ejecting ipod displays there is no music and videos on it except photos....even i am unable to restore it(saying connecting in internet)... Can any one
-
Crystal Reports 2008 - automation and scheduling
Hey there Crystal Reports experts... please answer this question: I've been evaluating the Crystal Reports 2008 package (client package) and have been able to generate some nice summary reports form our SQL database using summary pages which have mul
-
I am having trouble saving pdf files using Adobe on my PC. I get Error 1324. The path My Documents or the volume is invalid. How do I fix this please. I tried to uninstall and reinstall but I cannot uninstall as I get Error 1324. The path My Document
-
Received and Issued quantity in same column in PLD.
Hello All, I've created PLD for Inventory Valuation method, the problem is both the received quantity and issued quantity are display in the same column. But I want it in different columns, that is received quantity in one column and issued quantity