Posting MIRO before MIGO

Dear Experts,
When a PO is raised for 100no's with each piece costing 10. Before posting a MIGO a MIRO is posted for 50 no's for 600.
Then the MIGO is posted for 100 no's.
what price will be taken at the time of MIGO?
what account get generated when the material is maintained in Standard Price as well MVP.
Regards,
Nani.

hi
>Is the value taken from MIRO for MVP or Standard Price.
it will take from MIRO only
>In this two cases what will be the accounting entries and G/L account hits?
with MAP
At the time of LIV (MIRO);
Vendor A/c - Cr
GR/IR Clearing A/c - Dr
At the time of GR (MIGO);
Stock A/c - Dr
GR/IR Clearing A/c - Cr
WITH STD
At the time of LIV (MIRO);
Vendor A/c - Cr
GR/IR Clearing A/c - Dr
PRD -Dr
At the time of GR (MIGO);
Stock A/c - Dr
GR/IR Clearing A/c - Cr
PRD-Cr
regards
kunal

Similar Messages

  • MIRO before MIGO

    Can I do MIRO before a MIGO. How do we justify it.
    If I do MIRO before MIGO what will be its implications.
    If I do MIRO in March 2006 and its MIGO in April 2006; is it possible? if not then how to solve the problem if it has been done.
    Regards
    VS

    Hi ,
    Its possible to do MIRO ahead of MIGO. This is the case especially when you are doing procurement with Forign trade , and your imports have to be custom cleared before you receive the goods.In such case , we do the MIRO , issue payment for the  delivery costs (Transport and customs duty etc) , clear the goods from customs. Then do the MIGO , and , MIRO for the payment/ Clearing the payments for the GOODS received.
    How ever , to be able to do this you will have to carefully check the options in the PO in the Invoice tab : You should not select the option " GR based Invoice verification". This check box is detrimental on how you can process the invoce.
    Do few simulations using these controls and you can understand them better.
    Except this explicit setting in which we intend to do the invoice verification before MIGO , in other cases system will not allow you to post the invoice,you can at the best park / hold the invoice.
    Hope this information helps.
    Regards
    raghuramam.

  • Material consumption posting date before MIGO

    Hi,
    I have one issue related to Material Consumption....
    If material received and posted on 25.12.2011 then how come system is allowing to consume ( Mtype 261) on 12.12.2011.  As material stock on 12.12.2011 is Zero.  We have not allowed Negative Stock Posting for Plant or in Material.
    We are consuming material for Production Order with in CO11N with Mtype 261.  Material phisically received on 12.12.2011 and we used it but due to some problem we are not able to do MIGO.  Now problem solved and MIGO posted on 25.12.2011, so we entered confirmation of production order with posting date 12.12.2011 and system is allowed to consume the material and now account reports shows nigetive values on 12.12.2011.
    can anybody focus on this issue......

    SAP checks only if there is enough stock in the period (month) not at a certain day (for performance reasons)
    Dont blame SAP, Why has your user posted the goods issue with an earlier date?
    Usually they do it because it was the date the goods issue happened physically, I have rarely seen users that user changing posting dates to fraud the system.
    was the GR eventually posted with  a wrong date?

  • Not to Post Planned Delivery Cost in IV before MIGO

    Dear Experts,
    We are maintaining the Delivery cost Condition values for different vendors in Purchase Order and we are selecting the GR Based IV check box. At the time of MIRO before making MIGO (Goods receipt) it will not allow to Post Incoming Invoice if I select Goods/Service items or both Goods/Service items & Planned Delivery Cost but it will allow if we select only Planned Delivery Cost to Post.
    Kindly suggest us if anybody have the solution to restrict to Post the Planned Delivery cost before posting the Goods Receipt (MIGO).
    Thanks & regards,
    Dhanu

    Dear,
    First u do the MIGO, After that post the Material IV with goods/service, after that u again do IV for planned delivery cost selection of Planned delivery cost.
    Thanks,
    If this is helpful for u then reward me.

  • Posting MIRO with reference to MIGO document number

    Hi,
    Is there any way of posting a vendor invoice in MIRO, taking MIGO document number as the reference instead of PO or Delivery Note reference?
    Muru

    Hi,
    In MIGO you mention the delivery note in the header part.
    There is a drop down in MIRO transaction where we enter PO number, please check and you will find the "Delivery Note" option in the drop down list.
    you can do the MIRO with reference to this Delivery Note number from this option.
    (Just make sure, that you have selected the "GR based IR" indicator in the PO line item.)
    Doiong MIRO with reference to material document number of MIGO is not possible in standatd SAP.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • Service tax value required updating while posting GR in MIGO transaction

    Dear Friends,
    We have a following scenario where service tax value required updating while posting Goods Receipt MIGO transaction.
    1. Purchase Order created for first line item where Qty. 1 and Net Rate Rs.1000/- so total Gross value will be Rs.1000/- example Vendor XYZ
    2. Freight condition type maintained for the first line item for Rs.500/- and assigned to Transportation vendor ABC.
    3. When Goods Receipt Posted for the Material against PO first line item, the material value updates Rs.1500/- (Material value as 
        per PO + Freight Charges)
    4.  After posting GR while making Invoice verification through MIRO transaction against the PO GR/IR clearance will be done for 
        Material vendor XYZ. For transportation Vendor ABC Planned delivery cost indicator will be select and since service tax is
        applicable Service tax code will also select.
    Here the values of Service tax if the Material available in Stock it will be inventories. If stock consumed before making the Invoice verification for Transportation vendor ABC, then the Service tax values update to PRD account.
    We know that in PO, tax code can be select for first line item (Raw Material) Vendor XYZ and if transportation charge condition type maintained for same first line item and assigned to Vendor ABC and there is no provision to maintain Service tax. So the service tax will get inventories while posting Invoice Verification for the transportation vendor.
    We want the values of Service tax to update while posting Goods Receipt in MIGO transaction.
    Thanks & regards
    Dhanu

    hi,
    Please note at the time of MIGO Servecie tax value does not appear, it will appear at the tiem of Invoice only.
    Regards,
    Rama Mohan Bangaru

  • While posting MIRO price difference account is not determimg for price vari

    Hi Sapients,
    Please solve the production issue which we have faced yesterday while doing month end closing
    In one P.O 4 items are there,User has posted entries in below sequence
    Material type is TRADING GOODS
    1)first MIRO with QTY 10 @100$ each,Later
    2)MIGO has done with QTY 10 @100$
    Raw Material account -
    1000$
    to GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
    1000$
    2)User has reverse the MIRO transaction with QTY 10 @ 100$ each.(with refer to step1)
    3)Finally he post MIRO with QTY 10 @ 90$ each, so here ther is no qty variance has come only price variance has come, so when posting the difference is not going to price difference and the entry is paasing like this
    GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
    900$
    TO Vendor 900$
    If u see in step 2 GR/IR having 1000$, but in step 3 while MIRO posting GR/IR as 900$ so for the remaing balance 100$ not going to price variance .I Belive the entry in step will be like this
    GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
    1000$
    TO Vendor 900$
    TO Price difference 100$.
    Kindly give solution why it is not going to price difference it was happening only for item 2 & 3 only for 40 iem it is posting correctly to price difference account.Please advice me why system behavig differently for each item.
    Thanks & Regards
    YSR

    Hi Padmasri,
    Thanks for your explanation. Ok. if the price is maintained in S, does that mean the price difference would get posted only to PRD. In other words, if price indicator is V, is that the only time when the price difference gets posted to stock account. In case if there is no sufficient stock or if there is negative stock at that time, that's when the amount would get posted to stock loss or gain account. Please suggest if I've understood the concept right.
    Hi,
    The PRD will trigger when the standard price maintained in the material mater record is different from the price in MIGO . The other chance is the material is maintained with MAP and MIRO done before GR ,The value of the quntity (not available in stock )
    will get posted to PRD. I hope this will resolve your issue. Thanking you
    You had suggested: The other chance is the material is maintained with MAP and MIRO done before GR ,The value of the quntity (not available in stock ) will get posted to PRD. I hope this will resolve your issue.
    You are right: I forgot to mention that the price indicator is V. The other point is we purchase the materials from an internal vendor, as and when the materials are dispatched from the main storehouse in Sri Lanka, there is an advice that is created in the system and that is interfaced and parked in the system. However, normally until the GR is done IV will not happen. But there could be a chance, as the advice gets created within 24 hours. However the material to reach the godown in our warehouse will take more than 24 hours as the goods have to be shipped from SL, so IV is possible before GR.
    Regards,
    Soujanya

  • J1iex before MIGO

    Hi ,
    For domestic procurement , someone has done J1IEX (Capturing) before MIGO, but in this case no Part1 enteries are getting generated.
    Is it the standard SAP functionality and if yes , is there any way to build a check such that user couldn't do J1IEX before MIGO.
    Apart from that I also wanted to a have a check in system so that users are not allowed to do MIRO before Posting excise invoice thru J1IEX.
    Looking farward for your reply.Thx in advance
    Regards
    Shrey

    Hi,
    You are suppose to capture the part 1 before you do the MIGO, if capturing is not done through J1IEX_C then the values will not be displayed in the MIGO document. Similarly posting is done in J1IEX_P before doing the MIRO for the values to come up.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Kiran

  • About MIRO and MIGO

    Hello,
    I am new for FI module.I want to know about MIRO and MIGO relation and what is it.and from which tables i can find values of it?
    thanks
    soniya

    Hi Soniya,
    Th transaction MIGO is used for posting Goods movement related documents.
    It is actually an Enjoy transaction from where we have options for
    Goods issue
    Cancellation....
    and so on.
    The corresponding entries for Goods Issue will be found in the MKPF.
    MIRO is another Enjoy transaction and is used for Invoice postings OR Commonly known as Invoice verification.
    Consult your functional for more information about this. You be able to understand this faster then.
    Regards,
    Prakash Pandey

  • Changing Baseline due date in MIRO before saving

    Hi - is it possible to block the BSEG-ZFBDT field from any user changes before they post MIRO?  I know that you can block this field against any changes after the document has been posted, but I also wnat to block against changes before posting to stop users from overwriting the baseline date.
    Thanks

    Hi:
            You can easily achieve that using SHD0...Enter MIRO in transaction code and in transaction variant enter ZMIRO and press create button..Enter co code and press enter twice.After filling other particulars and passing through all screens go to payment tab ..Screen for it will appear ...You can set it as display only there. Save and give your ABAP package . Save and exit and activate it in standard variant tab of SHD0.
    Regards

  • Error while posting MIRO

    Hi Experts
    I got a error like this while posting MIRO
    "No amount authorization for customers/vendors in company code 401"
    I tried to look out in T043 Table,since i cant able to go further
    Let me know the reason for this error and the settings to do
    Regards
    Amuthan M

    Hi,
    While creating tolerance group you are specified the authorization group/ Just delete the name of the group you have created and keep it blank OR assign the user to that group and save.
    Note:
    If you create tolerance groups then the group must be assigned to the users in t.code:OB57 who are posting the transaction. Defining and assigning the tolerance groups to employees is not going to solve, you have to enter the amount ranges of tolerance for G/L document, Customer and Vendor posting.
    In t.code:OBA4 create an entry for your company code. (Group creation is not compulsory). If your requirement permits better keep the group column empty. when no group is created its for all users.Double click on company code and enter upper limits and permitted payment differences and save.In t.code:OBA3 enter the ranges for payment differences and any other columns as per your requirement..
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Dealer Excise Invoice-Issue while posting MIRO

    Dear All,
    Today i was doing Domestic procurement with Dealer for Gas Cylinder. In PO we entered total value which includes Excise amount also (1000+103)& VAT @ 14% (154,42).
    While doing GR i selected as Only captured excise inv, checked MRP indicator.
    Changed the bse value to 1000, entered BED as 100, E Cess as 2 & SEcess as 1.
    The accounting entries were correct, Inventory is posting with Rs 1000
    Posted excise invoice in J1IEX, the values were coming from GR, its correct and the acc entries were also OK with 103 Cenvat clearing acc Cr & Excise acc Dr.
    While posting MIRO, I am facing problems...
    In line item i am getting as 1103 Base value...
    VAT is calculating on (1103+103) @ 14% 168.84,
    so total value is 1271.84
    When i simulate, its showing
    Vendor 1271.84 Cr
    GR/IR clg acc 1000 Dr
    Material 103 Dr
    VAT 168,84 Dr
    There is no cenvat clearing account here
    Please help me how to resolve this.
    Regds,
    CB
    When i simulate

    Hi,
    have you mainatin 100% setoof condition check it it should be there
    check MIRo posting date and excise invoice  posting date
    check condition record validity in FV13
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale
    Edited by: kailasugale on Feb 10, 2012 12:01 PM

  • Error While Posting MIRO of Imports PO

    Dear Sir
    When we are trying to post MIRO for Imports PO with Local currency we get following Error
    Enter rate INR/CHF rate type M for 16.05.2011 in the system settings
    For IV (Invoice Verification) we use currency CHF as our Vendor currency is CHF.
    But During MIRO for Customs clearing Charges and Freight Forwarder charges we need to use INR at that time we get this Error.
    Enter rate INR/CHF rate type M for 16.05.2011 in the system settings
    If we maintain currency rate in OB08 of INR & CHF will solve this problem?

    Dear:
                Your question is self explanatory. System is asking you to maintain exchange rate for date 16.05.2011. Maintain the rate in OB08 and your issue will be resolved.
    Regards

  • Error while posting miro - max permitted no of internal tax items reached

    Hi expert ,
    When i am posting miro i facing error like 'Maximum permitted number of internal tax items reached' .
    Detailed description of error 'The maximum number of internal tax items is limited to 999' but if i entered less than that i.e. upto 600
    line item then i also same error coming.
    what is the solution for that.
    Regards,
    Jyotsna

    Hello,
    Check SAP note 1431727.
    Regards,
    David

  • FI:While posting MIRO getting Error of Balancing field Segment not filled

    Hello SAP Gurus,
    While  posting MIRO getting Error of Balancing field Segment in line item 001 not filled
    Message No.GLT2201.
    Please suggest me solution for it i read lots of related threats but could not solve this error.

    SPRO-Financial Accounting (New)-General Ledger Accounting (New)-Business Transactions-Document Splitting-Edit Constants for Nonassigned Processes-Select your constant-Double click and Select Assignment of profit center- Enter your dummy profit center here   otherwise
    SPRO-Financial Accounting (New)-General Ledger Accounting (New)-Business Transactions-Document Splitting-Edit Constants for Nonassigned Processes-Select your constant-Double click and Select Assignment of values-Enter here segment.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Users priv on projects

    Hello. How can I manage user rights to grant privileges only on some projects in designer? Security manager has branch "Instances/projects" in "Users" tab, but I can't understand how should I customise it? P.S. ODI 10.1.3.6 Edited by: user12281180 on

  • Solaris Sparc 10, Firefox 3.6, Java v6 update 18 plugin not working

    The java plugin (v6 update 18) for Firefox 3.6 on Solaris Sparc 10 is not working for me. $ pwd /opt/sfw/lib/firefox/plugins $ ls -l total 19606 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 9982480 Feb 17 10:34 libflashplayer.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 54 Feb 17 11:03 libj

  • Final Cut Pro 4.5 and Quicktime 7 compatibility issues. Error 39!

    I see some people saying Quicktime 7 is not compatible with Final Cut 4.5 and some saying it is. I upgraded to 10.3.9 and then Quicktime 7 and I started getting error 39 at this one spot in my timeline and then crashing if I tried to play just a few

  • .itl extension added to iTunes Library file

    Until the 10.4 (80) update, there was no .itl extension on the iTunes Library file. I know this, because i have 9 different iTunes Libraries spread over 4 different external hard drives. I have created Automator "workflows" to switch from one Library

  • Transactions sm20 and sm21

    Hi All, Could anyone pls tell me the difference in the logs of 'security audit'-sm20 and 'sytem '-sm21 Also would want to know  about activating the security audit-sm19 and the consequences of activating it.