Posting to specific A/C at the time of PGI

Guys,
I need to give some materails as free goods. So the item category is TANN and I created a new schedule line to use new movement type lets say 901. Now I will configure G/L accounts according to this movement type and I will post in respective GLs. But the problem is that I shouldn't be posting that in COS account rather to some expense account. Now this expense account does need a cost center as the cost element associated with this has cost element category as 1 which is 'Primary costs/cost-reducing revenues'. Now I cannot post goods issue as it needs cost center and I cannot supply cost center as there is no field for it in delivery document. Please Help guys I need it urgently.
regards,
MAM.

Hi
The postings will be as follows
During GR
Debit Rs 100 - Inventory A/c
Credit Rs.100 - GR/IR A/C
During J1IEX
Debit Rs.12 - RG23A - Yr plant
Creidt Rs.12 - Cenvat/CD Clearing account
During IR
Debit Rs.100 - GR/IR A/C
Credit Rs.100 - Vendor A/C
Debit Rs.12 - Cenvat/CD clearing Account
Hope you are clear now
Regards
Dev

Similar Messages

Sales order stock problem at the time of PGI

Dear Experts
When a sales order is being created , the delivery is done.The moment PGI is done the system gives a error prompt as " sales order stock XXXXX not created for the item YYYY"
I dont want this to happen.
I wish that at the time of PGI system should simply and directly pick the qty from the storage location and do the PGI.
Also we dont have availabilty check at the delivery item ctgy level.
Expert suggestions are required.

Hi
Go to MB1B and enter movement type 412 , special stock E and enter
then enter sales order no and item no
enter storage location, material and quantity and save it
other wise in sales order VA02
go to procurement tab in the overview screen change requirement type to daily requirement
you will need not to do the above process
regards
vardhan

Additional G/L account entry at the time of PGI.

Dear All,
I have scenario of exports. At the tiem of PGI we generally get the entries Inventory account credtt to cost of goods sold account credit.
I want to have a track the value of goods which are at the port. So it is required have another g/l account entry at the time of PGI.
Which will be recoicilled at the time of commercial billing.
Can any one help me out. How to have the addtional G/L account entries along with the standard G/L entry.
Thanks and regards
Rasik Waghela

Hi Rasik
You need to modify the account assignment for Goods issue and find out a user exit to replace the account at the time to commercial biiling.
Regards
Yatin

First delivery date change at the time of PGI

Dear Expert,
i have one query , i have fixed in house production time=1 days, planned delivery time10 days in MRP-2 views .Suppose i create one sales order on current date the first delivery date will pick the date ,(current date10 days). but user wants to change the first delivery date at the time of PGI as per their need, as it may be before or after the required delivery date.
HOW TO CHANGE THE DATE.
give your valuable solution regarding this.
KInd regards
vimlendu kaushik

dear expert
system is not allowing to change the required delivery date as sujjested by you. i have one fg material say 'X' its planned delivery time is 10 days, availibilty check -02.while creating sales order for the above fg material system will pick (current date +planned delivery time), say current date 20.10.2010 & pdt-10 days, syatem will pick 30.20.2010.
but after go to va02 it is not allowing to change the delivery date, but it can happen at any time as business needs this.
kindly resolve this issue with proper logic.
kind regards
vimlendu kaushik

Cost Centre Derivation Issue at the time of PGI

Dear Experts,
At the time of Posting Post Goods Issue, SD Consultant is facing error that GL Account 6* requires assignment to a CO Object.
According to my understanding, system should derive Cost Centre at the time of P.G.I through following logic :
I have assigned Profit Centre : 999999 to the Cost Centre : ABCD and the said profit centre is being used at the time of Sales Order Posting. While doing PGI, system should derive cost centre data from Profit Centre Data which is used in Sales Order but currently system is not behaving like this.
Another way is to assign respective cost centres against COGS Gls through T-Code : OKB9 which is not right I think. Because how can we map Cost Centre Data with Profit Centre Data in order to get Profit Centre Wise Profitability Reports?
Please guide me any solution.
Regards,
Sapna

Hi Sapna,
For most cases, your COGS account should not be a cost element.
Secondly, if you want to make it a cost element, you will have to maintain OKB9 for it, either on the basis of profit center or plant.
System cannot pick cost center based on the cost center master data because there may be many cose centers assigned under the same profit center. There is no one-to-one mapping of cost center to profit center.
I would suggest you do not make COGS as cost element unless the sale order is an MTO sales order or business insists on it.
If business insists on it, then add the cost element to OKB9.
BR
Abhi

Automatic Creation of Sales Order at the Time of PGI

Hi Experts,
Is it possible to create automatic Sale Order at time of PGI "while creating Outbound deleivery w/o reference to Sale Order'?
Like in MM there is feature (standard) that PO can be create through Inventory management also,
at the time GR w/o PO system creates PO in background.
Please help me out,
Regards
Arvind

Hi Srinath,
Thankx for u'r immidiate reply,
"This is my business requirement in implementation, i.e. customer directly purchase Organic Manure from plant stock and pay bill against the quanty purchased." although the reoprting purpose will be resolved by sale bill report."
And as we know that Document (copy controls) flow from Inquiry>Contract>Order>Out bound deleivery>Billing. this is standard in the system.
i.e. Copy Order to Order (VTAA)
Order to delivery (VTLA)
Order to Bill (VTFA)
Del to Bill (VTFL)
This T-codes have assignments of source to copy in the target with routins (for the flow of data from field to field)
I am trying to understand that flow of data to be copied in backward flow i.e. from PGI to order, and i am expecting that this can be done, but unable clarify my self that should it be done or not.

Expense booking at the time of PGI

Guys,
I need to give some materails as free goods. So the item category is TANN and I created a new schedule line to use new movement type lets say 901. Now I will configure G/L accounts according to this movement type and I will post in respective GLs. But the problem is that I shouldn't be posting that in COS account rather to some expense account. Now this expense account does need a cost center as the cost element associated with this has cost element category as 1 which is 'Primary costs/cost-reducing revenues'. Now I cannot post goods issue as it needs cost center and I cannot supply cost center as there is no field for it in delivery document. Please Help guys I need it urgently.
Regards,
MAM.

Hello,
Please try to create Automatic account assignment in CO - Transaction code OKB9
Regards,
Ravi

Error at the time of PGI

Hi All,
I am facing followed mentioned error at the time of doing pgi..Kindly suggest...
Error is Number range for trans/event type WL in year 2011 does not exist..
Rgds,
Pavan.

pls. check -
Error while Doing PGI
thanks.

Settings to trigger output at the time of PGI in shipment

Dear Friends,
I have a requirement where an output has to be triggered from the shipment document (VT02N), when the post goods issue is completed.i.e when the user completes the "shipment start" stage in the shipment document.
The output document has to be sent by email to a couple of users when PGI is completed in the shipment.
Since,here we are not manually triggering the output, instead the output is triggerred automatically when PGI is done.
Please let me know the settings to trigger a particular output when PGI is done.
Waiting for valubale feedback.
Regards,
Sampath

Hello,
You can do this through Configuration.
LE>Transportation> Shipments >Define and assign activity profile
With reference to shipment type you have 7 status available. In your case Shipment begin stage you can Set PGI and Output trigger by creating variant.
All you have to do is put the mouse on the "at shipment begin" and select maintain and you can see the PGI option and output fields where you can call the output type there.
try it will work....
tkreddy
Edited by: Tkreddy on Nov 10, 2009 3:00 AM

Qty is automatically getting zero at the time of PGI from Deliveries in WM

When we go to PGI an order it changed all of the deliveries to zero and created an invoice at zero value.
It is happening dramatically. it is not happening with every delivery.
Thanks in advance

In what transaction do you do the goods issue to the delivery? in VL02N ?
How is the picking quantity set? when confirming the TO with LT12 you can set in the control section of the selection screen what you do with the picking quantity. There you can overwrite the settings made for the movement types.
Check the change history of your delivery, whether someone changed the delivery quantity to zero.

COGS Posting at the time of Invoicing

Hello Experts,
We have a requirement wherein the COGS Posting should happen at the time of Invoicing.
Our requirement is as below.
At the time of Post Goods Issue
Stock in Transit A/c Dr
     Finished Goods A/c   Cr
At the time of Invoicing we are expecting the below 2 entries
COGS A/c                   Dr
      Stock in Transit A/c     Cr
Customer A/c               Dr
          Revenues
We would like to know how to achieve the 2 the above mentioned 2 entries at the time of Invoicing.
Best Regards
Balaji Kancherla

Hi Balaji,
I can give you below direction...
1. Go to OBYC and enter GL Account Goods in Transit for key GBB VAX. So whenever you post PGI, system will post GL Account Goods in Transit.
2. You will have to add two condition typs into your pricing procedure..
ZGDS:Goods in transit (GL Account - Goods in transit)
COGS:Cost of Goods Sold. (GL Accounts COGS)
Importantly, you will have to attach Calculation Routine which will bring the amount posted to Goods in transit at the time of PGI.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

Capture & Post Invoice at the time of Goods Receipt in one Step

Hi,
We are doing the following for Goods Receipt (as decided by other consultant)
1. Goods Receipt (Only Part I) - currently being done by Stores
2. Capture Invoice (J1IEX) - currently being done by Purchase
3. Post Invoice (J1IEX) - currently being done by Finance
We tried to capture & Post Invoice in single step at the time of Goods Receipt. The system is allowing us to do so. Can we do the goods receipt & capture & post invoice at the time of GR only.
What is the difference or benefit in doing GR & capturing invoice separately?
Regards,

>
PK wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are doing the following for Goods Receipt (as decided by other consultant)
> 1. Goods Receipt (Only Part I) - currently being done by Stores
> 2. Capture Invoice (J1IEX) - currently being done by Purchase
> 3. Post Invoice (J1IEX) - currently being done by Finance
>
> We tried to capture & Post Invoice in single step at the time of Goods Receipt. The system is allowing us to do so. Can we do the goods receipt & capture & post invoice at the time of GR only.
>
> What is the difference or benefit in doing GR & capturing invoice separately?
>
> Regards,
Hi PK,
Standard SAP provides different stages based on business criticality.
Since a warehouse person may not be aware of Excise functionalities he should only be allowed to capture the invoice, however Posting excise credit is a critical business function hence site Excise clerks should be allowed for these rights.
However based on business scenario or size of business the same can be done at one place.
So as your business demands the process can be changed with that. However criticality of the matter & process lies with the business finally.
There are scenarios where actual material reciept is short at times hence credit allowed has to be reduced than original, there may be scenarios where a critical excisable product may have wrong chapter heading maintained at PO level which needs to be changed at credit availment/capture stages to show correct chapter in excise registers...
these all cases support the process to be splitted & responsibilities segrigated....
Hope it assits....
regards
ak

When I did 7.1 update on iPhone five my reminders no longer works correctly it automatically erases the time and date that I requested

Can somebody tell me why my reminders no longer work correctly on 7.1 update on iPhone five every time I post a reminder it would delete the time and date of the reminder and my reminders do not go off.

Remove Office 2008 for Mac using Microsoft deinstall procedure. Reinstall Office 2008 for Mac. If there are updates, apply them. Using Disk Utility, verify/repair permissions on your boot drive.
Does Office for Mac 2008 now work correctly? If not, you may want to repeat the above first sentence, and then update to Office for Mac 2011, and apply the latest (14.4.8) update which has Yosemite fixes.

Withholding tax at the time of invoice-urgent

Hi all,
i want to know that, for withholding tax calculation at the time of invoice, is there any option of calculation of WHT before/after discount.
As i can see that in calculation at the time of posting...but not at the time of invoice.
can any one suggests me with that?.
i will assign points for any reply.
thanks

Looks like this is not possible. Check the following link.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/e4/5c823ae35c3769e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
In the above link, click on "Defining Withholding Tax Types" in the tree on the left.

NAS capabilities of the Time Capsule as media server after Snow Leopard

Why does Apple have to prevent the Time Capsule being used as a media server? I accept that it was never sold as such but pre-Snow Leopard it worked fine and was the ONLY reason I bought it in the first place.
I don't like Time machine. I have my own back-up procedures in place to take care of that. What I DO like is being able to have all my media in one place in my house instead of scattered across four machines. I also like that I could back up all the TC content onto another external connected to the USB socket on the TC.
It all worked well, gave me the security of knowing my media was being backed up daily and also freed up a lot of space on my other Macs.
With the advent of Snow Leopard Apple has rendered my music server as good as useless, prevented my ability to make scheduled back-ups and is forcing me to reconfigure my system with a proper NAS so I don't risk losing over 40,000 music files and 1000s of original photographs should the hard drive in the Time Capsule fail.
This will cost me well in excess of £500 and a lot of my time. Then I will have a redundant 1TB Time Capsule and another redundant 1TB external hard drive.
Why does Apple see the need to disable this functionality? If it doesn't support it how does it know it needs to prevent it? What is the issue here? All Apple seems to do is upset a lot of people who have made an investment in Apple equipment only to have the primary reason they bought it killed off.
Am I wrong here? Have I made some kind of configuration error that means my TC just disappears from my desktop and my iTunes stops playing?
Cheers
Rich
Message was edited by: rustyintegrale

Okay, I've actually posted about this issue before but was simply told that 'Apple do not support the Time capsule as a media server', but this is my experience...
I have a modem/router supplied by my ISP that distributes wireless at 'g' standard - fine for our iPhones, but all our Macs are modern Intel models capable of using the 'n' standard.
So I bought the Time Capsule for two reasons - one to give us that faster wireless service and two to act as a media server by consolidating all the music, video and photo files we had in duplicate and triplicate across the four machines in our household.
The TC was connected to the router via gigabit ethernet and then via ethernet to my 3.06 iMac from where everything is managed. Wireless 'n' standard access at 5GHz was provided to our laptops and as expected every machine could 'see' the TC on the network.
I then moved all our media files onto the TC with no problem and added a 1TB external drive to the TC via the USB port. I then discovered that Chronosync installed on my iMac could see the TC and the TC Back-UP drive so I used that to copy everything over and set up a schedule to ensure that regular copies of new files were made.
I then added both the TC and the TC Back-Up to my login items so they would automatically mount on the desktop upon start-up. Restarting the machine proved this worked fine so I proceeded to point all the Macs' iTunes libraries to the new location on the TC and set them NOT to copy the files over when adding to library.
This all worked fine and all the Macs could access and play iTunes, surf the internet etc. except in the distant corners of the house. To help coverage I bought four new Airport Expresses with 'n' capability and set each one to extend the wireless network created by the TC.
Then I added an Apple TV and linked that to the TC network too. This again was managed via iTunes on the iMac and set to automatically synch new recordings made via my EyeTV.
This whole set-up has worked flawlessly for over a year and until I installed Snow Leopard.
When I first restarted after installation on my iMac I really noticed nothing. The TC mounted as usual and when I started iTunes my Apple TV began to automatically synch. Everything seemed to be operating normally. However when I double clicked the TC icon to access my files I got a warning message saying 'The alias “TIME CAPSULE” can’t be opened because the original item can’t be found.' I was given the choice to delete or fix the alias or just go Okay. When I chose 'fix' a new Finder window opened where the TC was clearly visible in the left column and it said I was connected. But in the next column both the TC and the TC Back-Up were greyed out.
I then dragged the TC to the Trash on my iMac and I could hear it spin up and then it finally moved.
I then opened a new Finder window, selected the TC and it came up with a preview calling it a 'Sharepoint' and no longer like a normal hard disk.
Meanwhile I realised that because iTunes was no longer 'seeing' the TC it had defaulted to the Music folder in my Home folder and was now busy deleting all my Apple TV stuff because it couldn't find the originals.
This has been going on for several weeks now and I am increasingly frustrated by trying to find a workaround. Meanwhile Chronosync no longer makes scheduled back-ups because the drives don't mount on start-up - well they do as aliases but that's no good if they're not linked to the originals!
What bothers me is that all this stuff worked like a dream under Leopard - indeed many others have similarly used Time Capsule as a media server and must no doubt be seeing similar issues to my own.
If I can't continue using the TC this way then Apple have essentially removed the very functionality I bought it for and thus rendered it useless.
Of course if there is a glaring configuration error or even an adjustment post-Snow Leopard that needs to be made then please tell me. However the original reply to my older post of 'Apple do not support the Time capsule as a media server' does not leave me with much confidence in getting this resolved any time soon.
I have everything crossed however...
Cheers
rich
Message was edited by: rustyintegrale

Posting to specific A/C at the time of PGI

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for