Posting with a fixed coster by gl account

Hi,
When i run the RPCIPE00, i would like that some gl account have a fixed cost center and not the cost center define by default in the infotype 0001.
I have customized this : OKB9 + Set Up Fixed Costs Postings (SPRO) in the source and destination system but nothing works.
Could you help me?
Thanks.

Hi,
We have the same problem. We did both conifiguration for assigning fixed account in FI and HCM. But posting still put the cost center in IT0001.
How did you do to solve your issue?
Thanks,

Similar Messages

Invoice posting with planned delivery cost

Hi all,
I want to post an invoice informing the delivery note at MIRO. My PO has a planned cost, although, determining it's information through the option '2 - delivery note', the planned costs are not brought to the line.
I can't find a way how to bring it, only when I inform the PO that option is included. Is there any message I can pop up so the user knows there is a planned cost?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Marcelo Buosi.

Partha,
For delivery note option, this field is not showed, only for PO option.
Does any one know any way I can bring the planned cost through delivey note?
Regards,
Marcelo.

Problem in Fixed Cost center Posting

Hi Gurus,
I have a scenario where in a particular Wage type is getting posted to a Fixed cost center irrespective of the Cost center assigned in Org assignment in Live posting run but when the same process is done in simulation ,wage type gets posted to a the master Cost center(the one mentioned in Org assignment Infotype).
Please suggest what could be the possible reason for this.
Also,where do we do the config setting for assignment of Fixed cost center to a particular wage type.
Points assured for helpful answer...
Thanks & Regards,
Sushil

Hi Sushil,
There is a button at I0015 and I0014 to post a WT to a cost center different from the master cost center (I0001).
Regards,
Carlos.

Subsequent / re-activation of Cost of Sales Accounting

We are currently engaged at a new SAP customer (ECC6) that does not currently require COS Accounting to be activated /functional area functionality, but might require it at a later stage / subsequent to the initial go-live.
Based on the contents of SAP Note 740519, it appears that when COS Accounting is subsequently activated, the functional area cannot be repopulated for historic data when using ECC6.
QUESTION:
Should the customer decide to subsequently activate COS Accounting at the start of a new fiscal year (i.e. post go-live), all the P&L data will be populated with the functional area from the start of the new fiscal year. However, what about the carry forward balances for the Balance Sheet accounts? Is there a way to repopulate the "carried forward" balances in the Balance Sheet with a functional area, else the balance sheet will always contain incomplete functional area data for the carried forward balances.
Also, please advise if there is a program available to repopulate functional areas subsequently in the event of a subsequent activation of COS Accounting. If not, if the customer activate COS Accounting even though they don't require it at present, because it appears that you cannot change the functional area assignments once updated with transactional data?
As such, what is the recommended course of action:
1. Only activate COS Accounting when required, but resulting issues with updating historic data with functional area.... OR
2. Activate and configure pre go-live, but then cannot change functional area assignments once populated with transactional data.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Kind regards,
Dolf

Hi Dolf
   I have exactly the same requirement now with respect to cost of sales accounting. My client went live a couple of months back and now wants to activate Cost of Sales Accouting. I have the same question of how to populate the existing historic data with the functional areas.
   What did you do when you had this issue? Did you find out any way or work around to update the historic data with functional area? What approach did you take during your implementation?
    Your response would be highly appreciated and rewarded.
Vamsi

How to calculate fixed cost for by-product in costing run?

Dear,
We want to have some fixed cost calculated for by-product B in costing run.
Our current practise, we only calculate the delivery cost as variable cost for this by-product B in the costing run for B. The by-product B is a component in the BOM of finish product A.
However, we need some fixed cost to be countered in for by-product B, which can be by controlled by us.
Any thought?
Thank you all in advance.
Christina.

Dear,
You have to maintain BOM Usage-Costing-6 i.e., Costing BOM with all your required Fixed Cost related Material components and assign it in the by-product Material Master to include the Fixed Cost in by-product Standard Cost Estimate. Based on this setting, system will calculate Standard Cost Estimate with this Fixed Cost and display in the related reports.
Regards
appalas

About cost center accounting (Transaction based posting with CO assignment

Hi,
I m working on cost center accounting ,and i m stuck in transaction based posting ,i m post transaction through FB50,
i m given concern G/L account Dr 8000 and credit to bank account with account assignment cost center 10100.after i simulate this transaction the system accepts and i m enable to see the transacion after simulation,but after that i m going for save it at this time system geting error ,and error is like ---
Not possible to derive owner from account assignment/bank details
Message no. REEXFI054
Diagnosis
In the condominium owner company code, the system attempts to determine a unique condominium owner for each document.
To make this determination, the system analyzes:
The profit centers in the document. Usually the system derives the profit centers from the account assignment objects in the individual line items. In the condominium owner company code, the system determines the profit center for real estate objects from the condominium management contract for the rental object.
The house bank data in the document. Therefore, the affected bank account has to be entered uniquely in each bank line item. You can enter the house bank and the account ID in FI posting transactions by choosing Additional Data. The system then searches for the condominium management contract that has these bank details.
In the current case, the system is not able to determine a unique owner.
System Response
The system cannot post the document.
Procedure
Check the account assignment data and bank details.
So plz guide me about this ,
Regards,
Pramod Kulkarni

Hello again,
First off all thank you both for your answers.
Dirk,
When I said enhancing I was not thinking of developing the hole thing. That seems to be a hugely complex task and I do not have the time for that in the project were I am presently working. What I meant was: Is there a SAP Enhancement available? A function exit? A Customer Include? Something that is half way done?
If this is not the case the solutions I thougth were:
i) Replicate my infocube's data into a ODS. Develop a report on the R/3 side that reads that data via a RFC and uses Batch Input (Call transaction) to update the data on the R/3 side;
ii) Develop a function module (similar to the standard one) on the BW side to use in a planning function of type exit which would update a Z database table on the R/3 side and, afterwards, develop a report (also on the R/3 side) which would read that database table and update transactional tables via Batch Input (or Call Transaction with a developed log transaction).
From the point of view of performance I believe the solution involving the ODS is better because we are talking about 300 000 materials.
As for your proposed solutions 1) and 2) althougth they seem very nice and elegant I would like to avoid changing the R/3 customizing. Regarding your proposed solution 3) I am going to take a look at the function group you mentioned and the respective note.
Once again thanks a lot for your answer. You have been very helpfull.
Best Regards,
Vasco

Reversing A/P Invoice posted with wrong date and inventory cost adjustment

Here's the situation:
We had a PO dated 9/1/09 for items with a cost of $14.50, a Goods Receipt was entered 9/15/09 for the items with the same cost on the PO of $14.50. Somehow the order got lost in the mix and the AP invoice wasn't entered until today, with a posting date of 1/21/10 and the cost was corrected per the original vendor invoice to the right amount of $19.33. The invoice was actually dated 9/15/09. This resulted in hitting the vendor, purchases clearing and the inventory account (for the cost adjustment) in January 2010 when it should have occurred in September 2009.
The inventory itself has come and gone in the time between the GR and when the invoice was done with the incorrect date. Normally I would try to reverse the transaction with a Credit Memo and start over, however since the inventory side happened so long ago, I don't see any way of easily going backwards. I thought about doing service CM/invoice but what I am most concerned about is having the inventory valuation occur properly at the correct time. I'm not sure how to go about this.
Using SAP B1 2007A PL42 with moving average inventory.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Nicole,
I am afraid you may not have ability to do the adjustment based on historical date that long times ago. You know, the moving average has limited calculation based on current quantity and cost. There are no options to go backward especially new year is coming.
Thanks,
Gordon

Cost-of-sales accounting / DUMMY-substitution for CO posting w/o func. area

Dear experts,
we activated Cost-of-sales accounting (special ledger - no use of NewGL functionalities).
We use the SAP "Standard substitition" in FI to make sure that all postings on P&L accounts go to special ledger. If no functional area can be derived, posting is assigend to Dummy functional area.
So far so good.
My question is: Is it possible to set up a "similar" substituition in case of CO postings with secondary cost element (e.g. Internal activity allocation, Overhead Rates) on other CO-object without functional area.
e.g. Internal activity allocation from Cost center to production order. No functional area assigned to production order.
I hope you unterstand my question for this issue.
Thanks in advance for your reply.
regards,
Butch

thanks for your answer.
I added the filed FKBER in table VWTYGB01.
Now I can select field "functional area" for CO Substitution.
nevertheless substitution does not work and set functional area on Dummy FB 9990 for CO postings to CO-object without Functional area.
Thats curious because I maintained exactly the same Substitution on an other SAP System (IDES Test System) and here it works.
Any ideas?
Are there further settigs required after maintenance of table VWTYGB01??
Thanks in advance

Tax calc. during invoice post - taking unplanned del cost into account

Hi all
Iam posting an invoice in Miro for a p.o
i have material cost,unplanned cost
Iam using a input Tax of 5% which should only take Material cost into
account while posting.
but in my case it is taking the unplanned del cost also for calculation
can you pl. let me know where the changes are to be made so that only material
cost is to be taken for tax calculation.
for eg
material cost -- 100
tax               -- 5.0%
unplanned del cost -- 10
so my inv. value should be -- 115.00
where as it is taking as -- 115.50.
regards
Prasanna

Hi srinivas
Thanks for your inputs
This is the present scenario.
We are distributing Unplanned del cost among the line items.
1. without having the Config made ( in OMR2)
We can still post the Invoices with Unplanned delivery cost
(without clicking the Calculate tax button )
by adding the
1. unplnd del cost in invoice details
2.clicking the Net proposal button on tax tab view
3. enter the total amt on basic data
4 when we are simulating we are getting
Warning message *********Twice ******
as Tax entered incorrect (code V4, amount 5.50), correct 6.05 eur
Message no. FF 707. and then we get the
5 We have to click the continue button twice
6 then we get the Invoice data view
7 when we click post , then again the
above warning message appears,
8 then we click continue button then it allows us to post.
correct me if the above process is wrong
My question :-
        1. is this the standard functionality when using unplanned delivery cost (without tax calculation )
       2. Can we apply some OSS so that this message appears only once.
Thanks
prasanna

POSTED ENTRIES INTO A GL WITH T-CODE FV50 IS POSTED TO A SINGLE COST CENTER

Please i need solution to a problem. Transactions posted with t-code FV50 is going to a single cost/profit centres irrespective of the cost/profit centre selected. viewing the transaction on Entry view shows the correct entry view but the GL view for all the transactions shows that all the transactions are reporting to an independent cost centre different from the on entred.

Dear,
Please check whether document spitting is activated and the splitting characteristics is based on cost center.
Spro >Financial Accounting (NEW) > General ledger accounting (NEW) > Business transactions > Document splitting > Define Document Splitting Characteristics for General Ledger Accounting.

Fixing transactions posted with the wrong currency rate.

Looking for the best solution to fix transactions that have been posted with the wrong currency rate. Transactions with System Currency (SC) and Local Curency (LC) have been posted with the wrong exchange rate. I am looking for best practice to corect each transactions. I have noticed and tested the "Conversion Difference" feature in SBO. This feature does help me change the exchange rate between SC and LC but for an the account balance on a certain date. I am looking to change all transactions from Jan01 to Jan 31 for all GL accounts. Is there a feature to do this?? You help is greatly appreciated,

I don't think there are any options to FIX this problem by out of the box function. Because all financial transactions have been entered to the system already, you have to reverse all of them and repost those transactions with the right exchange rate. No shortcut available.
Thanks,
Gordon

PO report with cost center & GL account detail

Hi Guy,
Any body so kind to help me to find out a standrd SAP report which give the account assingnment detail about PO order line item.
The standard SAP report ME2K give the assigned cost center but not about the assigned GL account.
My requirement is as following:
PO NO Item Material Quantity Cost Center GL Account No
It means PO line item assinged to cost center & GL account.
Thanks in advance.
Rgds,
sp sahu

Mr Radhakrishnan & Mr MS,
The ME2K transction only give cost center wise PO. Not give the information about the GL account assigned to the PO.
Whereas in KSB1 report give the information about the PO for which some material document already posted. I mean to say, KSB1 include those PO which have PO histrory is present. what about those po for which no GR or IR has done. It may come in commitment report that is in KSB2.
My requirement is a report which give information about the GL account assigned to all the PO created in the system.
Thanks for reply.
Regards,
sp sahu

Substitution for "Cost of sales Accounting" not working with cycle-trx KSC5

Hello togehter,
I have a problem that it seems that a created Substitution for "Cost of sales Accounting" is not executed in our System when running a cycle for Indirect Activity Allocation (Trx. KSC5).
Now I want to debug the Indirect Activity Allocation but I don't know how those Substitution Steps are generated as code that I can set a breakpoint when executing the cycle with Trx KSC5.
I want to try a trace when activating the substitution with transaction OBBZ but I'm not able to analyze in which Forms/Functions the Code is generated.
I also saw some OSS Notes that there are problems with "Cost of Sales Accounting" but I don't know concretely what to do to solve that special problem.
Kind regards
Udo

thanks for your answer.
I added the filed FKBER in table VWTYGB01.
Now I can select field "functional area" for CO Substitution.
nevertheless substitution does not work and set functional area on Dummy FB 9990 for CO postings to CO-object without Functional area.
Thats curious because I maintained exactly the same Substitution on an other SAP System (IDES Test System) and here it works.
Any ideas?
Are there further settigs required after maintenance of table VWTYGB01??
Thanks in advance

Accounting Validation for blocking TDS posting with T-code

Dear Expert,
I have a requirement like below in OB28 Accounting Validation:-
I want to block Accounting posting with F-02 T code with Wht GL code Posting.
I have written:-
Prequisite:-
BKPF-BUKRS = '1020'
SYST-TCODE = 'F-02'
Check:-
BSEG-HKONT='403625' (which is a TDS liabilityGL code)
Message:- Error
But it is not working, The document with F-02 and GL code 403625 is getting posted
Please advise.
Regards,
Alok

A small correction in Validation rule.
Check:-
BSEG-HKONT<>'403625' (which is a TDS liabilityGL code)
BSEG-HKONT should not be equal to 403625
Correct that and try posting.

Posting with reconciallation account

hi,
how to post the commission amounts of a vendor to their reconciliation's accounts while releasing to accounting from vf02 automatically, may i know the configuration settings in IMG.
here customer and vendor is different.
Edited by: santosh kumar on Oct 22, 2008 3:13 AM

Hi
Post with clearing and Account Clearing are 2 methods of clearing accounts which are not used at the sametime.
Post with clearing is used for when invoice exists in the account and payment made against that invoice both items have been cleared
Account Clearing is used for invoice exists in the account credit memo or any other entry posted to the account both items will show as open items in the account we have to manually clear those items.
Edited by: Venkat Padarthi on Dec 17, 2007 4:53 PM

Posting with a fixed coster by gl account

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for