POSTED ENTRIES INTO A GL WITH T-CODE FV50 IS POSTED TO A SINGLE COST CENTER

Please i need solution to a problem. Transactions posted with t-code FV50 is going to a single cost/profit centres irrespective of the cost/profit centre selected. viewing the transaction on Entry view shows the correct entry view but the GL view for all the transactions shows that all the transactions are reporting to an independent cost centre different from the on entred.

Dear,
Please check whether document spitting is activated and the splitting characteristics is based on cost center.
Spro >Financial Accounting (NEW) > General ledger accounting (NEW) > Business transactions > Document splitting > Define Document Splitting Characteristics for General Ledger Accounting.

Similar Messages

How can i turn a photoshop file into a website with knowing code? can i upload Muse or DreamWeaver?

How can i turn a photoshop file into a website with knowing code? can i upload Muse or DreamWeaver?
I created a few images (pages for a site) on photoshop and want to turn them into HTML code for a website- Can i Just upload the file into one of these programs and make a file with the correct code imediatly?
I was reading about using EDGE Reform but i did not understand if i can create the code with it, in the end it says it still needs to be sent to website developer after?

You need to look at Dreamweaver as a code editor. You need to learn to create good, clean HTML code with style sheets to make websites with Dreamweaver.
There are tutorials that will take you from a layered .PSD file to HTML. Here's a good one:
http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/site-builds/from-psd-to-html-building-a-set-of-website-d esigns-step-by-step/
Adobe's Muse is a semi-WYSIWYG website layout creator for small websites (1-5 pages). But there is no way you can go from a .PDS file to Muse, you have to start the site in Muse.
I have seen a few Muse sites and they're OK, but there is some code that Muse creates that is kind of odd. If you want a good, clean website that will work for you or your business, Dreamweaver is the best choice. Alternatively, you could hire a pro.
-Mark

Posting entry into non leading ledger for already closed books

Hi
We have two ledgers - Leading (as per IGAAP) and Non Leading (IFRS)
Now there is Rs. 54Lacs expenses which are pertaining to March 2010. This expenses are being booked in October 2010
Now as per IFRS, i need to re-instate this amount in March 2010
So i want to pass this entry for IFRS ledger only in fiscal year which is already closed and carry forward
So what should i do now?
Should i open the posting period for March 2010 (last closed fiscal year). Is it possible ?
If i open and post the entries, do i need to carry forward the balances again for IFRS Ledger ?

Hi Meenu,
You need to open the posting period 3 of 2010 and post entry only in the non Leading ledger of IFRS. When you post entry it will automatically be reflected in the current year.
Secondly, the carry forward transaction does no harm even if you run it again..
Regards,
SAPFICO

Determine company code and location (plant) w.r.t., cost center

Hi,
How could i determine company code and location based on given cost center. Could anybody please let me know if any table or function module is available to get this.
Thank you

Hi,
As mentioned above im using META_READ_TABLE FM to get company codes from CSKS table of ECC. Below is the code im using:
   DATA:i_opt type STANDARD TABLE OF RFC_DB_OPT, i_fld type STANDARD TABLE OF RFC_DB_FLD,
       i_res type STANDARD TABLE OF TAB512.
Constants:   c_expr(72) TYPE c VALUE 'KOSTL EQ COST_CTR', c_fld(5) TYPE c VALUE 'BUKRS'.
w_opt-text = c_expr.
w_fld-FIELDNAME = c_fld.
append: w_opt to i_opt,
        w_fld to i_fld.
data i_control type STANDARD TABLE OF BBP_CONTROL_RECORD.
**&&--Get Co code from ECC (CSKS table)
CALL FUNCTION 'META_READ_TABLE'
EXPORTING
    QUERY_TABLE          = c_table
*   DELIMITER            = ' '
*   NO_DATA              = ' '
*   ROWSKIPS             = '0'
*   ROWCOUNT             = '0'
    LOGICAL_SYSTEM       = v1_logsys
TABLES
    OPTIONS              = i_opt
    FIELDS               = i_fld
    DATA                 = i_res
    CONTROL_RECORD       = i_control.
however it is giving me 'Communication Error' while executing this piece of code. I guess the problem here is with table i_opt which is holding logical expression. while calling this fm system is not recognizing logical expression 'KOSTL EQ COST_CTR'. Could anybody has any suggestion for this. please advise.
Rgds

Inserting Entry into Custom Object with API

Hello,
I have a custom object made and access to both BULK and REST APIs.
I was wondering how I could take the information I have (It's only 4 fields) and inserting this information as a new record into my data object.
I have the ID for my data object I just can't seem to find the API call I'm looking for.
Any help is greatly appreciated!

Adding new records to a Custom Object is best done using the Bulk API. You need to define a Custom Object import and use it to sync your records into Eloqua.

Help !!! Re: Fianacial Analytics failed with Error Code = 36331

I am getting an error exactly reported under another Post 'Re: Fianacial Analytics failed with Error Code = 36331'
workflow log shows DB error to OLTP database..
ERROR : LM_36488 [Wed Aug 19 15:05:52 2009] : (5928|2384) Session task instance [SDE_ORA_GLJournals_Full] : [TM_6193 An error occurred while expanding the connection parameter [Database connection name ORA_R12 for database connection variable $DBConnection_OLTP is not well defined.
Can someone point to where the probem is
I have Physical datasource definition of OLTP Warehouse -> Test Connection works fine -->

I am unit Testing the activity SDE_ORA_GLJournals under Execution Plan, i can see an error.
ANOMALY INFO::: Error while executing : INFORMATICA TASK:SDE_ORAR12_Adaptor:SDE_ORA_GLJournals_Full:(Source : FULL Target : FULL)
          MESSAGE:::
          Irrecoverable Error
          Error while contacting Informatica server for getting workflow status for SDE_ORA_GLJournals_Full
          Error Code = 36331:Unknown reason for error code 36331
          Pmcmd output :
any ideas
girish

Cost center being posted in another co code

HI,
I am facing a peculiar problem.
I am able to post to a cost center which is assigned to som eother comany code.
For example: I have 2 com codes, X1 and X2.
I have assigned cost center CC1 to X1 but still I am able to post it to X2.
Your immediate help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Nitish

hi kings
Please let me conform.. What is the importnce of currency types in profit center accounting.
How it will be work in profit center accounting.
In which cases we are using the diference currency type instead of controlling area currency type.
regards
RAM

Cost Center Error Message in Posting a Billing Document to Accounting

Hi Experts,
I am in process of testing my form enhancement for Billing Documents especially Debit Note and Credit Notes. However, when I post my Billing Documents in VF02, this status message appears:
"Field Cost Ctr is a required field for G/L account 2100 855020".
Now I already checked the configuration in FS00, VKOA and we want the cost center field filled-up in the process but automatically. Do I missed some of my configuration to maintain also the Cost Center? What transaction code should I check and maintain the Cost Center for this scenario.
Thanks a lot for your answers.

Here is the Entire Error Message:
Field Cost Ctr is a required field for G/L account 2100 855020
Message no. F5808
Diagnosis
The value for field "Cost Ctr" in the interface to Financial Accounting is an initial value but you are required to make an entry in the field selection for G/L account "855020" in company code "2100" linked to the field selection for posting key "50".
System Response
Error
Procedure
It might be an error in the configuration of the G/L account field selection. The initial application, used to call up the interface must otherwise define a value for field "Cost Ctr". If this is the case, contact the consultant responsible for the application used to call up the interface or get in contact with SAP directly.

Assets Captalised with wrong cost center

Hi,
I am facing one problem while capitalizing the asset it get capitalized with the wrong cost center and the depreciation is also get posted for two month. Now my problem is how to correct this entry as this is posted to wrong profit center.
Is there is any way to correct the posted entries in FI.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Rajesh Kumar

Hi Rajesh,
Transfer the asset to a receiving asset with the correct cost center using T code ABUMN. Make sure that the asset value date is the same as the capialization date of the sending asset (unless is was capitalized in a prior-year, then use 01/01/CY). When depreciation is ran for the month using T code AFAB, the depreciation in the wrong cost center will be reversed and reposted to the correct cost center.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Chad

TAX code requires default cost center

Hi,
There is an error coming while posting the MIRO Invoice with tax code ( need to be charge to PL Account) " put the cost center " for GL Account for tax code. This is a cost element & hence requires cost center but the field for entring tax posting. Issue we are facing is that we are forced to default the cost center as screen is not input enabled(greyed) for cost center in tax calculation screen & it is also not picking up the cost center from purchase order screen.
Need to know any solution for this issue.
Regards,
Vipin

Hello,
Kindly refer to the thread to resolve your issue here.
Table for user attribute data
Thanks & Best Regards,
Rahul

Implication of changing the Cost center during posting

Hi all,
Due to business reasons, we have unchecked the 'Agree' indicator in the Acct assignment configuration for Asset accounting. Hence, cost center becomes editable during document posting.
We want the cost center to be editable only for ABF1 t-code and for other asset t-codes like acquistion, retirement, scrapping, transfer etc, we want to derieve the cost center from the master data.
Given the situation, I request experts' input on 2 questions -
1. Is it possible to have the cost center editable only in ABF1 and disabled in other AA transactions?
2. If cost center is editable in all the t-codes, what is the implication if the cost center is mismatched with the data available in the master record?
Please provide your inputs.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sridevi

Hi,
The client has many plants, of which only few are running in SAP and the rest non-SAP.
Whenever there is transfer of asset from non-sap plant to SAP implemented plants, we handle the situation as below in the receiver plant-
1. Treat the asset transfer as legacy asset transfer and create asset master record through AS91. Maintain the cummulative acq value and Cummu depn value till the last period in master data.
2. As legacy transfer is not real time integrated with FI, we are doing ABF1 posting to pass manual JV to record APC and Acc depn. posting. At this instance, we want the cost center to be manually keyed in. This is because, we have yet another situation, where we need to have the net book value of the asset at cost center level for our allocation cycles. Hence,
3. But, for other normal AA transactions, it shd automatically derieve from asset master.
Request your suggestion on achieving the above requirement.
Regards,
Sridevi

Commitment code---cost center and gl

There is a issue regarding budgeting.
we have some option that we are considering. pls give some views on it
option 1 whenever we put a cost center while making any posting ,system picks up a commitment code and then budget gets allocated. but here same commitment code gets selected for same cost center but different expenses in same cost center.
cost center is a/c              commitment code is       cc1    (g/l 1 repairs)
cost center is a/c              commitment ocde is       cc2    (g/l 2 salary )
option 2. we have a GL bank charges and cost center then based on this combination of gl and cost center a specific commitment code    a/c-b.charges get filled in commitment field.
if we have another cost center (IT) and same GL bank charges then based on this second combination another commitment code gets selected     IT-b.charges
so    for cost center 1              if there are 30 commitment codes
then for cost center 2              there will be another 30 commitment codes
so we have 60 cost centers then in all we will have 1800 commitment codes.
we want a way in which less commitment codes are opened yet we are able to achieve what we are getting in second option.

Hi
U r using Fund management , In Fund Manageemnt there are derivation rule. u create a GL account in FS00 , suppose Stationry expenses.the Same Account u created in fund management called commitemtn item.Suppose statioanry expenses.
in fund management u are also create fun center
u crerate aderivation rule, in derivation rule u assign :-
Cost center = GL Accounts
Cost Center=Comitment item=GL accounts
Fund center= Asset account
if any query feel free ask me
Regards
Roobal

Launching the depreciation, which cost center is posted?

Hi All,
an asset contain a cost center in its master data.
For the Cost elemen which refers to that asset, in t.code OKB9 in signed as defualt another cost center.
When I launch the depreciation of that asset, which cost center is posted? The one in it's master data or the other that i find in t.code OKB9?
Thanks
G.Rossi

Hi, if you make customizing in acset and additional account assignment for asset, then from asset master data

Cost center receiving the real posting even WBS Element are present

Dear All
As per standard SAP documentation, when both cost center and WBS elements are present in the same accounting document, WBS element will take real posting and cost center will take statistical posting.
But in the MIRO document cost center took the real posting even the WBS element is present in the line item of the accounting document.
Regards
Partha Pratim Bhar

Hi
If the WBS element is not statistical, then the real posting should be to the WBS element. However, if you see, when the WBS element becomes a statistical,(when the check mark is added in the control tab) the field cost center becomes active and needs to be input.
In your case since you are deriving the cost center through a substitution rule. Normally if you rules of priority during a document posting, the substitution and validation rules takes a higher priority. So apparently the cost center will get the real posting!! Since the real posting is already made to the cost center, the entry to the WBS element would become a statistical one...
Thats the reason why the situation changes when you deactivate the substitution rule. I am not sure about the entry in the WBS element...My guess is that you would not be able to settle the costs in the WBS Elements.
Hope this clarifies.
Karthik

Slow drilling into cost center reports - S_ALR_87013611

Hi All,
When drilling into cost center report S_ALR_87013611 to view cost center actual line items experiencing extreme slowness before it brings up the actual line items (which display in transaction KSB1). Trying to display only one cost element with a few lines in one period for one cost center. The sceen hangs up and takes long execution time to display actual output.
However, if we launch another session and run KSB1 it runs pretty fast.
What could be the reason of this slow performance. Checked trace and it doesn't show large execution cost for any SQL statements.
thanks
any

Hi Anya,
Since we are deling here with a standard report did you check OSS? This is one note which could be applicable (although it mentions performance problems for a range of cost center while you indicate a single CC).
[Note 840414 - KSB1: Long runtimes when report is called|https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=840414]
It is worth checking out.
Good luck,
Robert

POSTED ENTRIES INTO A GL WITH T-CODE FV50 IS POSTED TO A SINGLE COST CENTER

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for