POWL based Advanced Search

Hi all! I am confused over the below configurations for Advance Search:
Define Object Types for Advanced Search
Define Default POWL Application for Advanced Search
I tried to match the query with the one that I see when I run Advanced Search on the portal but could not see any similarity in the settings. For example, for business object 2201, the default query used is SAPSRM_AL_PURCHASING_03_01. I then run POWL_QUERY to view the layout and selection criteria of this query. However, it does not match the fields I see when I run Advanced search on business 2201 (Purchase Order).
I have also made sure that the user has the role with access to the application id assigned to SAPSRM_AL_PURCHASING_03_01 in the configuration 'Define Default POWL Application for Advanced Search'. The application id is SAPSRM_AS_PO.
Can someone please advise whether I am off the track or that I have missed out anything?
Cheers!
SF

I have digged further and carried out some tests. I think POWL for advanced search is only available with harmonized roles.

Similar Messages

  • I need a code for Advanced Search based on my custom multi select listbox and query through programatically (jquery)with out design

    Hi,
    I have a grid and advanced search link buttonand
    search button.
    if i click on Advanced Search link...open a panel with 3 list boxes(multi selection)
    if i select multi selected items in list boxes and click on search-->show the grid with selected items
    getting data from Sql server custom database.
    And the code i wil expect  is 'Programatically using jqury and asp.net code' with out single line of design.
    Could you please help on the above task.

    Hi,
    I have a grid and advanced search link buttonand
    search button.
    if i click on Advanced Search link...open a panel with 3 list boxes(multi selection)
    if i select multi selected items in list boxes and click on search-->show the grid with selected items
    getting data from Sql server custom database.
    And the code i wil expect  is 'Programatically using jqury and asp.net code' with out single line of design.
    Could you please help on the above task.

  • Problem in using quick and advanced search based on transient items

    Hi everybody
    I want to have an unbound string item in my form and allow users to use advanced search and quick search on that item.
    I read the following post About advanced search and added a transient
    item on view object and overrode the advance search method in application module and realized that the value of that string was
    added to arguments.
    Then I decided to add this transient item on entity object instead of view object so that we were able to add the item in one place and
    use it in several view objects. I added an item in the entity and unchecked the persistent flag but I can't set queryable flag since it was disable.
    I added the item in the view object and by use of application definition I forced the item to be shown in the advance search.
    I generate the application and the item was shown correctly in the advanced search but when I set the item in advanced search its value
    was not sent to advance search method.
    Is it a bug ? (value of the field in the advanced search section was not sent to advanced search method )
    Is it a way to add a queryable transient item in the entity object and still benefit from overriding advanced search method ?
    I am using Jdeveloper 10.1.3 and Jheadstart 10.1.3.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Best Regards
    Navid

    Navid,
    JHeadstart checks whether the attribute definition is queryable before adding it to the list of advanced search attributes. A transient VO attribute can still be set to queryable, for a transient EO attribute this is not possible. We will remove this check on queryability in the upcoming patch release, since you have a valid use case. For now, you can subclass JhsSearchBean and override method createArgumentListForAdvancedSearch and comment out the check for "def.isQueryable()".
    Steven Davelaar,
    JHeadstart Team.

  • Advanced search based on term set

    I have a picture library where I use a term set to tag photos. The managed property is called owstaxIdCuisine.
    When I perform a keyword search using one term from the term set (e.g. "vegetarian"), I would expect the pictures tagged with this term to be on top of the results. However it is not the case.
    I have tried to include my managed property under "Add property restrictions" and enter the keyword there, but it doesn't seem to make any difference.
    When I use refiners on the search results, it works fine: if I click the "vegetarian" checkbox, then I get only the vegetarian pictures. However I'd like my users to get the correct results directly from the advanced search form.
    What am I missing?
    Christophe Humbert Path to SharePoint http://blog.PathToSharePoint.com User Managed Solutions http://UserManagedSolutions.com

    Hi Christophe,
    Have you checked if you could add the custom managed property in the advanced search form per the following article?
    http://waelmohamed.wordpress.com/2011/05/31/add-custom-search-properties-in-your-advanced-search-sharepoint-2010/
    Thanks
    Daniel Yang
    TechNet Community Support

  • SRM 7.0 Advanced Search Object Type

    Dear All,
    We use SRM 7.0, I want to remove some object types from Advanced Search options in Portal. For example, in standard advanced search, you can select shopping card, confirmation, purchase order, contract... etc. And i dont want some emplyees to see all purchase order or contracts.
    How am i going to delete for example purchase order option from advanced search ?
    Best regards,

    Hi
    Advanced search drop down menu is based on SPRO configuration
    SRM server -- Cross application basic settings -- POWL and Adv search
    Here Standard object types will be defined as SAP entries under define objects types for advanced search.
    Also, default application will be assigned for each object types.
    If you deleted any of these standard object types, then that object type will not be available in advanced search for any SRM roles. However, that is not advisable to deleted standard objects.
    Alternatively, if you want restrict certain group of users to access the some object types, you can control through the configuration powl_queryR which is query visibility at role level.
    You can control the the same at user level if you want through powl_queryU
    Regards,
    Krish

  • How to add a new  search criteria in Advance Search Page in OAF

    HI,
    In my application (R12) we can access customer related information from 2 places (2 different responsibilities as mentioned below), both are OAF pages.
    1. AX receivables
    2. Sales online
    From both the responsibilities we can perform search for customer related information as well (Simple as well as Advance Search).
    But Advance Search screen from 'Sales online' allows user to perform search, based on few additional fields as well such as 'Classification' (it's an lov based field).
    Now, User is asking to add that field on search page of AX receivables as well.
    So, how to add one more field (as search criteria), on an standard 'Customer' screen?
    Additional Info :
    1. LOV is based on HzPuiClassificationFilterVO
    2. And this VO is available on both pages. (oracle.apps.ar.hz.components.search.server.HzPuiClassificationFilterVO)
    So can we achieve this by Personalization only ? if yes plz share the steps as well.
    Regards,
    Adi

    Yes. It is possible through personalization.
    1. Create a criteria row under Advance Search
    2. Create a Result Item under advance table columns
    3. Create a Query Criteria Map based on the criteria and result item above.
    Please note the newly added criteria field should be in the Searchresults VO attributes list.
    Otherwise you need to extend the VO as well.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    -Mukesh.

  • BAPI to search for customer in CRM based on search terms

    Hi,
    Could anyone please tell me if there is a function module in CRM to search for BP's based on search terms. ( Just as we could enter '*' in search terms in transaction BP and get a list of customers ).
    Thanks in advance,
    Sahil

    Hi Sahil,
    You can make use of BAPI_BUPA_SEARCH.
    In the import parameter CENTRALDATA you can pass the
    search terms.
    Ranjit

  • Performance impact of Content based message search in IE

    Hello Experts,
    I am working on implementing Content based message search in IE in PI 7.0 and PI 7.1 landscape.
    All the configurations are done and its working fine in Development scenario.
    I need help in identifying , how this actually works on technical level as in how the messages are getting searched based on the filter criteria, if there is any table getting created in background and values are getting stored etc.
    And also how could this impact the overall performance after implementing it in Production system.
    Thanks in advance!
    Warm Regards,
    Lisin

    Hi Lisin
    Not sure about 7.0/1 but for 7.4 these are the tables.(most probably tables should be same)
    When you configure a filter for UDMS search on ABAP stack(Tcod: sxms_lms_conf)
    Entries will be created in the following backed ABAP tables. (you can go to se16 and check the entries).
    SXMS_LMS_EXTR
    SXMS_EXT_FIL
    SXMS_NSPREFIX
    Data will be stored in this table
    SXMSPDATA
    When you configure a UDMS filter in RWB(java stack), entries will be created in the following backend tables
    XI_AF_LMS_EXTRACTR
    XI_AF_LMS_FILTER
    Data will be stored in the table (only the message id, direction, key field,value and position)
    XI_AF_LMS_DATA
    We have UDMS configured in our production system, and i never saw any performance issue.
    Regards
    Osman

  • Bug after adding fields in advanced search mode of af:query

    We are migrating from JDeveloper 11.1.1.6 to 11.1.1.7.
    I noticed the following issue:
    In a page with search criteria (based on a view object), when the user adds an additional field in advanced search mode and clicks on a full submit button in the page, the following browser popup appears:
    "This page is asking you to confirm that you want to leave - data you have entered may not be saved."
    This was logged as a bug in Oracle Support but we have not been able to find a workaround yet.
    This is the only issue currently blocking us from migrating to 11.1.1.7. Has anyone else faced this issue? Any ideas on how we can bypass this behavior?
    Thank you,
    Gabriel.

    Unfortunately, the latest update from Oracle Support was that they no longer consider this a bug!
    SR 3-7706485141: Additional Fields in af:query problem - JDeveloper 11.1.1.7
    Bug 17346704 - ADDING FIELD TO AF:QUERY ADVANCED SEARCH CAUSES SPURIOUS WARNING DIALOG POPUP
    1. I cannot understand how something that blocks user actions and cannot be bypassed in any way could be considered "acceptable behavior".
    2. I also do not understand how a Bug can be lodged and then have its status changed to "Not a Bug".
    3. Even if we were to ignore this issue and convince our customers that they should be delayed by meaningless popups while working (which we cannot), their is still another issue that makes this functionality dysfunctional. When the user clicks on "Stay on Page" the popup closes and the page freezes and becomes unresponsive.
    Off course this is another issue and a different SR should open, but I think it shows that something is going very wrong with this functionality.
    I wonder if anyone else is considering using JDeveloper 11.1.1.7.0 in a production system.

  • How to restrict columns in Advanced search which are known at runtime

    Hi Team,
    I need your suggestions for one of my adf search usecase. I had Querypanel with table on UI...where in Viewobject has relations with 2 other tables and this Viewobject is based on Entity...now in advanced search for addfields i was getting all column names by default like 3 tables column names....instead of all columns i need to restrict to particular columns. This particular columns will be decided at runtime like how many columns needs to be shown and alias names for those particular columns. So could you please help me how to approach this requirement.
    Thanks in Advance for your help.

    whatever you said is at designtime wherein we can uncheck the Queryable checkbox....but as i said at runtime from the application i can come to know whichever fields needs to be there and alias names for columns for add fields in Advanced search...

  • Hide Content Area in Advanced Search page

    How can we hide some Content Areas in the 'Advanced Search' page (3.0.9)?
    Thanks.

    You can create a test case based on the JHS Demo (shipped with JHeadstart 10.1.2.2) or the HR Schema (see http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/tips/muench/jhstutorial/index.html#setuphrschemaanddata). Please e-mail it to [email protected],
    * removing the cabo folder from the web root (public_html) before zipping it, it makes the zip much smaller
    * renaming the .zip file to something like .zipped, otherwise our mail server will not process it
    * including detailed steps to reproduce the problem.
    Thanks,
    Sandra Muller
    JHeadstart Team
    Oracle Consulting

  • A bug in Advanced Search ?

    Hi,
    In my requirement, I have an EO-based view object which is the view instance of an advanced table, and I provide two submitButtons, 'save button' and 'reset button' on the table which is used to do commit and rollback respectively for the data update.
    When user click on 'reset button', getOADBTransaction().rollback() statement in the AM will be executed , then a strange thing happens, the "Add Another" poplist in the advanced search panel will become blank.
    Hence I'm wondering transaction.rollback() will cause clearing the VO in the 'Add Another' poplist?
    Do I have another way to roll back the change and meanwhile the poplist would not be cleared?
    Please help.
    Regards,
    MZ

    Navid,
    JHeadstart checks whether the attribute definition is queryable before adding it to the list of advanced search attributes. A transient VO attribute can still be set to queryable, for a transient EO attribute this is not possible. We will remove this check on queryability in the upcoming patch release, since you have a valid use case. For now, you can subclass JhsSearchBean and override method createArgumentListForAdvancedSearch and comment out the check for "def.isQueryable()".
    Steven Davelaar,
    JHeadstart Team.

  • Operators in advanced search view

    Hi Experts,
    could you tell me how the available operators are determined in advanced search views?
    I build a search view based on a own custom BOL and want to remove some operators now.
    Thanks in advance!
    Best regards,
    Alex

    Nevermind!
    Solution: Component Specific Settings -> Define Operators for Dynamic Queries in SPro.

  • Customization in Advanced Search Area.

    Hi All,
    There is a requirement in advanced search area of return orders.
    Based on the transaction type selected, corresponding status values has to be populated.
    Here im populating the transactio type values in the drop down list box and status value i have to populate in the value help/ drop down/ F4 application, but these status values should be populated based on the transaction type we have selected.
    We are working on CRM 5.0 version, and i have done few things,here im listing out the steps.
    1) For the Transaction type field i have enable the Roundtrip CS search option.
    2) I have created a new ABAP structure for the transaction field(ZCS_Trans_Search).
    3) I have appened this abap structure to the calling F4 application (Status F4 appln)
    4) implementing the IF_CRM_BSP_MODEL_ACCESS_IL_2FILL_F4_STRUCTURE and IF_CRM_BSP_MODEL_ACCESS_IL_2CHECK ACTIVE_SHUFFLER methods, but still im not able to enter in to this methods in the debug mode.
    These steps i have done with the ref to PCUI COOK BOOK 5.0 version, here im copying the steps given in PCUI 5.0
    5.1.3.7 Context sensitive value help
    The current complex value help is not fully context sensitive. It does not consider the information
    the user has already entered on the screen, If it is present in different screen position or in different
    line of a list than the field on which F4 is pressed. Thus, the value help often displays result set
    which are not related in the current context. To make value help context sensitive following points
    must be improved.
    • The complex value help must consider the entries of relevant fields on the calling
    applications screen as search criteria.
    • The value help application should be enabled to set the value in the Search-Shuffler
    depending on the current context.
    • The application should be enabled to dynamically disable the availability of the value help
    icon for a field.
    To implement this feature for any field in the field group following steps to be performed:
    1. New field group customizing flag is added the by checking this enables context sensitive
    search for a input field. Field group customizing is called “Roundtrip CS Search”.
    <Include the figure>
    2. Determine the fields to be transferred to the value help application from calling application
    and create ABAP structure from this fields.This structure is called “Context sensitive
    screenstructure” (CS structure). Assign this CS structure to the complex value help
    application which is associated with the input field. This is done in:
    Transaction crmc_blueprint
    Open the node “Application/Layout node “
    Edit the value help application
    Enter the name of the structure in the filed “Struct. For Context-Sensitive srch. Help ”
    (F4_CS_STRUCTURE)
    3. PC-UI FW takes the CS structure data from the calling application and defaults them in the
    value help applications advance search screen structure. Include this CS structure to the
    advanced screen structure of value help application to have the same fields of CS structure
    and add the corresponding fields for the CS structure to field group of advance search.
    4. Implement IF_CRM_BSP_MODEL_ACCESS_IL_2~FILL_F4_STRUCTURE in the calling
    applications Model Access Class. In this method you fill the value in CS structure which will
    be passed to the value help application.
    IF_CRM_BSP_MODEL_ACCESS_IL_2~FILL_F4_STRUCTURE
    5. Implement / or enhance if already implemented
    IF_CRM_BSP_MODEL_ACCESS_IL_2~CHECK_ACTIVE_SHUFFLER in value help
    applications MAC. This step is optional, With this you will be able to select the correct
    shuffler based on the context sensitive data passed with new import parameters values to
    this method.
    IF_CRM_BSP_MODEL_ACCESS_IL_2~ CHECK_ACTIVE_SHUFFLER.
    Please do suggest me.. what are the things further i need to do..
    REMEMBER: I have to do this implementation in the advance Search area.
    Regards.
    Anilkumar.

    Hi,
    As I understand, you would like to have more than 5 property filter in Advanced Search web part.
    According to this article, it is one of the limitation in OOTB Advanced Search web part: "The property search doesn’t allow the users to specify more than 5 property filters." As workaround, "Reuse the OOTB Advanced Search UI’s hidden controls
    that determines the search attributes (ASB_PS_…)". Please refer more information via:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/senthilkumarmani/archive/2010/06/05/custom-advanced-search-metadata-values-pre-populated-for-user-selection.aspx
    Also, I find two articles about customizing the advanced search Webpart adding custom properties in case you need:
    http://vuppalasanthosh.blogspot.com/2013/03/customizing-advanced-search-webpart.html
    https://waelmohamed.wordpress.com/2011/05/31/add-custom-search-properties-in-your-advanced-search-sharepoint-2010/
    Regards,
    Rebecca Tu
    TechNet Community Support

  • In advanced search inputtext turkish character problem

    Hi friends,
    In my project when page is shown first Turkish characters in input text looks fine.But when I press advanced search button only input texts values changed and turkısh characters not show.For example İ return Ý.
    I use jdeveloper 10.1.3.1 with jheadstart 10.1.3.1 license version. Project is published with oracle application server soa suite 10.1.3.What am I do for solved it???Thanks for all....

    Can you provide step-by-step instructions to reproduce this behavior based on the HR demo, that can be downloaded from
    http://otn.oracle.com/products/jdev/tips/muench/jhstutorial/MyDemo.zip
    Steven Davelaar,
    JHeadstart Team.

Maybe you are looking for