Preparation for Consolidation in SEM-BCS.
Hello All,
Im implementing SEM - BCS (BW-based). I have the following versions:
- R/3: SAP ECC 6.0
- BW: 7.0
- SEM: 6.0
What do I have to customize in R/3 in order to extract the correct data to BW?
Do I have to do all the customization in transaction SPRO (Enterprise Controlling -> Integration: Preparation for Consolidation)?
I know that I have to create the companies and assign them to the company codes. I also have to create group chart of accounts and assign it to the transactional chart of accounts.
Can I do this in the account master data or do I have to have a Financial Statement Version for the Group?
Is it necessary to maintain Transaction Types for Consolidation?
Do I have to customize the Consolidation Staging Ledger and extract the data from here to BW?
I think I have to customize all this, but because all this transactions are in EC-CS customizing and I want to implement SEM - BCS (in BW), Im not sure if this is the right path.
Can anyone help me?
Regards,
Helena
Helena Coelho wrote:Helena Coelho wrote:Helena Coelho wrote:Helena Coelho wrote:
GANSHA,
what you are telling me is:
- I don´t have to do the customization in ECC. The only thing I have to do is, identify the tables and extract the data I need to BW.
But this way, how does the system know, which postings are from group companies or not?
The company code in R/3 is equivalent to company (consolidation unit role) in BCS. The Group companies are created in BCS and the companies in BCS are under those group companies.
If I were you, I would check whether Fiscal Year Variant is same across all company codes in R/3. I would also check whether parallel currencies are activated or not. Non-activation of parallel currency is not issue, but I will try to understand what are all the currencies involved and the currency translation flow.
I have created the companies in ECC in order to fill the "Trading Partner" field in the master data ( vendor, customer and G/L accounts) and to use on FI postings.
Yes, you have taken the right steps.
I have created the transaction types in ECC in order to use them on FI postings.
None of this is necessary? I dont have all the company codes in SAP, some of the data will be uploaded to BW by file.
The transaction types in ECC are different from the transaction types (also known as Movement Types) in BCS. You will continue to maintain the FI transaction types.
Regarding the chart of accounts, I dont have a group chart of accounts. For what I understand theres two ways:
- creating a group chart of accounts in ECC and in BW will be available as part of the GL account master data
or
- creating Financial statement items for consolidation in ECC, Build a Financial Statement Version for the Group (linking the operational chart of accounts to the consolidation items).
I think, this is the only way for me to use the consolidation staging ledger (totals table GLT3)? Or am I wrong?
What you are telling me is that I dont have to do this in ECC, but in BCS customizing?
Im confused ... please help me!!!
Helena
In your ECC, whether GLT3 table is activated? In many clients' companies, GLT3 table is not activated. The GL totals data is available in BSEG table.
If you do not have Group COA/ Group GL accounts maintained now, there are many ways to get GL totals data with Group GL level info added. You have already mentioned the steps.
One more method is create a custom mapping table of Operational GL accounts with Group GL accounts outside R/3 (to be maintained as part of BW) and make your R/3 GL totals data to flow thru this table, so that the final data in BW is available in both operational GL accounts and Group GL accounts. Developers will be able to help you.
Edited by: GANSHA on Jan 11, 2008 8:39 AM
Similar Messages
-
How to prepare FI-GL for Consolidation in SEM BCS
Hello together,
can somebody tell me in a few steps how to activate the FI-GL (0FI_GL_6) that it can be used for consolidation in SEM BCS. My problem is that FI_GL_6 (and also FIGL_C10 for new FI-GL) have not all required fields for consolidation in SEM BCS, especially movement type is missing.
I know how to use the BCS data collection functionality "load of data stream" and I also know how to activate the BI Content for FI (and how to connect the data basis from BCS with the "FI Cube" via source data basis).
But how can I prepare the FI Cube (DataSource, InfoSource) that it concludes all neccessary informations?
Thanks for support.we consolidate on the BSEG tables for actuals and GLPCP for plan data, it all depends on your business requirements, if you feel that the details out of GL_6 is insufficient find out the tables that bring the needed information and build a custom data source, but my guess is that the content datasrc's should solve the issue in most cases.
-
SEM-BCS Preparation for Consolidation Group Changes
Hi All,
Is the task "Preparation for Consolidation Group Changes" only implemented when Consolidation of Investments has also been implemented?
Does "Preparation for Consolidation Group Changes" have any value on its own?
Any comments, replies or suggestions most welcome.Hi,
I think that prep for cons group changes is independent (but supplementary to) from CoI.
See what is said in help:
"When in the middle of a fiscal year a consolidation unit is either acquired by a consolidation group (acquisition), divested from a consolidation group (divestiture), or <b>changes its accounting technique</b> (method change), the following data must be adjusted:
- Reported financial data
- Standardized financial data
- Consolidated data with posting level 20"
As you can see, not only consolidated data are to be changed, but also Standardized and Reported.
Moreover, as is seen above, changes of accounting technique will also trigger such activities.
So, my answers:
1. No
2. Yes.
Best regards,
Eugene -
SAP BPC Consolidations vs SEM-BCS
Hi all,
Has anyone compared the features/functionalities of SAP BPC Consolidation with SEM-BCS consolidation? What are the advantages of BPC Consolidation over SEM-BCS, and vice-versa? For a brand new implementation, what is the preferred tool?
Thanks,
Sujoy BanerjeeHi Sujoy,
In general if you are starting out with a new implementation, BPC is the recommended solution for several reasons:
1) It's a unified solution offering both Consolidations and Planning
2) It's designed to be owned and managed by business users, not IT
3) It's integrated with the Enterprise Performance Management for Finance suite, which also includes profitability and strategy management
If however you need support for complex consolidation scenarios, such as legal consolidations, you may want to consider BCS.
You should be able to find several documents comparing the two solutions if you go the Support Center (https://websmp104.sap-ag.de/support) and do a document search on BPC vs. BCS.
Hope this helps.
Chris Clay -
Preparation for Consolidation group changes
Hi Experts,
I have worked on BCS but new to consolidation of investments and PCC.
I am not able to understand the Preparation for Consolidation (PCC) tasks as to why are they required. I've the following questions: -
1. SAP help says PCC tasks are supplementary to the C/I tasks. Could you elaborate on how are the suuplementary to C/I tasks?
2. What is the diff. between Acuisition in case of C/I and in case of PCC?
3. In terms of reporting what will go worng if we don't run PCC tasks after a new acquisition let say.
Thanks in advance,
SSC1. PCC creates records to offset the balance sheet balances upon divestiture. These records include the relevant cons group values, where most BCS records do not include cons group because cons group in most cases is determined dynamically via the BCS virtual infocube function module's consolidations logic.
2. PCC records and documents only occur when there is a divestiture in the master data for a cons group. This could occur for a divestiture or transfer activity. Acquisition does not affect PCC, except when it occurs as a result of a transfer, and it is relevant to the divestiture portion of the transfer as opposed to the acquisition portion.
3. Nothing after an acquisition, it is mainly for divestitures and transfers (where a divestiture is necessary in the cons group master data). -
R/3 preparation for Consolidation(BCS)
Hi Friends,
We are in ECC 6.0 , SEM 6.0
What are the preaparatory steps in R/3 system for the sucessful implementation of Consolidation system(BCS).
We are implementing the matrix consolidation in BCS( Company code/ trading partner Company code, PCA/trading partner PCA).
The main purpose of going for matrix consolidation is to get balancesheet by PCA. Can this be achived by New GL's standard features, than BCS?
What are the other BCS specific preparatory work to be done in R/3 for the purpose of BCS
Good replies will be awarded with points.
Venkat.ECC 6.0 has standard functionality of PCA based balance sheet and p&l.
U need to used DOC.SPLITTING for this.
if useful reward points
Nitesh -
Any landscape recommendations for 2004s BI & SEM-BCS 6.0 ?
Hi,
in addition to our ERP 2005 we plan to set up a separate central BI 7.0 for following integrated NW2004s scenarios:
- Enterprise wide central reporting, query and analysis.
- BI Integrated Planning (successor of SEM-BPS).
- SEM-BCS 6.0.
<u>Question:</u>
Should the BCS be installed on a separate system, because of patch interdependencies with the central BI?
If yes, does BCS still need its own local BI, or can it run remotely with the central BI (like the old BW-BPS)?
Similar sap recommendations exist only for SEM-BPS, which we won't use in favor of BI Integrated Planning.
I searched the whole sap.marketplace for this, in vain.
The installations and combination-possibilities are beautifully explained, but no official recommendations about what should all be put on one central BI and what should be better kept apart.
Rumors say you should keep SEM out of your central BI and give it its own BI, to avoid painful patch/release dependencies.
What about the "single point of truth"-conecept in one central BI then?
Thank's for any hints ...
RobertHi Eugene,
thanks for your callback. Here an example:
Say, you need a BI-Patch (urgent bug-fix) or may be a BI-Upgrade to be able to use new functionalities for your Enterprise wide central reporting, query and analysis (since you don't use the BI only for BCS).
So, you would have to wait, until the same is also available for SEM-BCS, as it it tightly coupled to the BI (e.g. direct writing to transactional cubes, query via virtual cube augmented with data at query-runtime).
Notes like 727776 and 317339 just make me suspicious.
A similar SAP Help-hint is only available for BW-BPS (but we will use BI integrated Planning)
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/44/584041b02e4c0de10000000a1550b0/content.htm
Since more and more SAP-Applications need a BI, i am desperately missing a comprehensive overview, which of them should not be placed in the same BI for technical reasons (e.g. one sap-note says Bank-Analyzer and SEM-BCS should not be on the same BI).
Regards
Robert -
Execution of preparation for consolidation group changes
Hello,
In 1/2011 there was a change in the consolidation units hierarchy.
A consolidation unit moved to upper consolidation group.
I cannot find in the master data of the consolidation unit , where should I update the FIRST CONSOLIDATION DATE,
and the LAST CONSOLIDATION DATE.
Best regards,
Odelia Volfovich.Look at the master data of the cons groups - both the initial cons group as well as the new cons group.
If this truly is a vertical move up the hierarchy, the initial cons group should have a period of divestiture, as 001/2011.
Because the cons unit has always been a part of the higher up cons group via the lower cons groups ownership, the new cons group should have period of first consolidation the same as that of the initial cons group.
The cons unit should remain in both cons groups until at least the end of the fiscal year and in many cases, depending on the reporting needs for year-over-year comparison reporting, it should remain for an additional year or more. -
Consolidation Monitor - SEM BCS
Hi all,
is there the posibility of simulating a Manual Posting in a custom report (e.g. using BAPI, FM, ect..)
I'm new in SEM, but analist has told me that Manual Posting is a standard functionality in Consolidation Monitor.
In my report after selecting some data I have to do some manual posting with them...
thanks,
enzo.Hi,
Please check if notes 897782 & 833400 applicable.
Best regards,
Eugene -
Preparation for Consolidation using EC-CS
Dear FI/CO experts,
We have a huge chunk of AR/AP/GL open items with wrong or missing values for trading partner (VBUND), profit center(PRCTR) and partner profit center(PPRCTR) fields.
We implemented EC-CS in our organization and need to rectify or correct these individual line items with the correct field values i.r.o the above fields.
When I use T-codes (F-04, F-30, F-51) for u201Cpost with clearingu201D functionality, though I am able to rectify the trading partner information in the newly created line items after duly clearing the erroneous existing line items, I am not able to pass the PRCTR and PPRCTR in the said transaction.
Further, the source tables for EC-CS is GLPCA and GLPCT and the data is not moved to PCA area even after rectifying the trading partner information using the said T-codes. So the correction methodology is not effective.
Have you anytime encountered similar type of a situation where in the infected data is rectified through a transaction posting rather than effecting table level changes in GLPCA and GLPCT.
Please suggest your views.
Regards,
RaosDear FI/CO experts,
We have a huge chunk of AR/AP/GL open items with wrong or missing values for trading partner (VBUND), profit center(PRCTR) and partner profit center(PPRCTR) fields.
We implemented EC-CS in our organization and need to rectify or correct these individual line items with the correct field values i.r.o the above fields.
When I use T-codes (F-04, F-30, F-51) for u201Cpost with clearingu201D functionality, though I am able to rectify the trading partner information in the newly created line items after duly clearing the erroneous existing line items, I am not able to pass the PRCTR and PPRCTR in the said transaction.
Further, the source tables for EC-CS is GLPCA and GLPCT and the data is not moved to PCA area even after rectifying the trading partner information using the said T-codes. So the correction methodology is not effective.
Have you anytime encountered similar type of a situation where in the infected data is rectified through a transaction posting rather than effecting table level changes in GLPCA and GLPCT.
Please suggest your views.
Regards,
Raos -
FI-GL Activating for Consolidation SEM BCS
Hello together,
can somebody tell me in a few steps how to activate the FI-GL (0FI_GL_6) that it can be used for consolidation in SEM BCS. My problem is that FI_GL_6 (and also FIGL_C10 for new FI-GL) have not all required fields for consolidation in SEM BCS, especially movement type is missing.
I know how to use the BCS data collection functionality "load of data stream" and I also know how to activate the BI Content for FI (and how to connect the data basis from BCS with the "FI Cube" via source data basis).
But how can I prepare the FI Cube (DataSource, InfoSource) that it concludes all neccessary informations?
I need following InfoObjects in the BI Content: how to?
these InfoObjects are not containend in the standard FI-GL Business Content...or do you know other possibilities for getting FI-GL data in BW and ready for consolidation in BCS?
0PCOMPANY
0MOVE_TYPE
nicht notwendig
0FUNC_AREA
0COMP_CODE
0PROFIT_CTR
0COUNTRY
0PCOMPANY
0GL_ACCOUNT
Thanks for supportHi MP M,
Hi Install all the components related to that flow.I mean Datasource,Transfer rules,Infosource,Update rules,Cube.Then nothing is missing in this flow which are in BI Content.
For the Info objects not in the flow
Search them individually from the BI Content and Install them.Later you map them respective fields in the transfer rules manually.Then maintain update rules to them.
Hope this helps
Regards
Karthik -
Hello...
I have a problem as explained below , will appricate if anybody can share there experience to help me out of it. THX IN ADVANCE....
<b>Problem :</b>
We are using standard extractor 0SEM_BCS_10 for extracting R/3 data for SEM-BCS. We observed that Company ID of Trading partner was not being extracted even for those line items in FI which has Trading partner value.
We investigated and observed this extractor fetches data from new GL Stagging ledger and further noticed that the stagging ledger captures this information about trading partner only if Scenario "Preparation for Consolidation" is assigned to the stagging ledger. But the problem is extractor is capturing the above information only prospectively and we have the requirment to capture Trading partner information even for our historic data.
Is there any way we can achive this.
Thanks & Regards
PrabhakarHi
Do you have some document on BCS ?
Thanks
Satya -
Hi Experts
have you worked with ERP 6.0 and SEM BCS into the ERP?
in ERP 6.0 all SEM components like BCS, BPS, CPM are in the same system as "add on" or I dont Know, is posible to work with this componentes from ERP?
I think is necessary install SEM BW and plug ins, I will apreciate your comments about this..
Thanks in advanceI realize that this is a BCS SEM forum and I do believe that OLAP is a better technology than OLTP for consolidation functionality, but there are "equivalent" BCS transactions in ECC as well. UCMON is "roughly" CX20. The consolidation menu is CX00(N) and customization is CX01(N). Both have been visible directly after entering "/n" in OK Code input field.
For more go to menu CX000 (nonCX transactions may not work due to reasons mentined earlier in the thread):
SEM BCS - Business Consolidation
-- CX00BCS Business Consolidation
CXGP Global Parameters
-- Master Data
Consolidation Groups
Consolidation Units
FS Items
Subitems
Custom Subassignments
CXRH Characteristic Hierarchies
-- Data Collection
CXCD Monitor
Reported Financial Data
Additional Financial Data
Manual Posting
Automatic Posting
Utilities
CXV1 Validation
-- Consolidation
CX20 Monitor
-- Manual Posting
CX50 Enter
CX51 Change
CX52 Display
CXA0 Mass Reversal
-- Automatic Posting
CX54 Interunit Elimination
CX5U0 Elim. of IU Profit/Loss in Inventory
CX57 Consolidation of Investments
CXEC Reclassification
CX24 Preparation for Consolidation Group Changes
Utilities
CXV1 Validation
--- Information System
ECCS Consolidation Reports
Tools
-- Business Information Warehouse
-- Business Explorer
FC_BW_BEX Business Explorer Analyzer
SEM_NAV Business Explorer Browser
FC_BW_RSZV Maintain Variables
FC_BW_RSZDELETE Delete Query Objects
--- BW Administration
FC_BW_RSA1 Administrator Workbench
--- Tools
S001 ABAP Workbench
S002 Administration
SBPT Business Communication
-- Business Engineer
SPRO Customizing SEM BCS
-- Business Framework
BAPI BAPI Explorer
BAPI Development
SWLD Business Workflow
-- SAPscript
SE71 Form
SO10 Standard Text
SE72 Style
Administration
-- Hypertext
SO70 Structures
SO72 Documents
--- Find
|
|----- Information System
SO80 Information Classes -
Hi Gurus,
I just want your expert advice on the following issue -->
I am a FI consultant and having no prior experience in BI and SEM.I have been sent for implementation of SEM BCS to one client where I am looking at everything i.e. BI and SEM for the first time.The client is in apparel business and operating across globe.
Just wanted to know the approx time it shall take to complete the comsolidation process under given situation.
RdsHi Amit,
Certain things has to be first known:
Number of company
Type of BCS functionalities used by client.
Extent of testing, documentation, training.
Geogrphical location of teams.
Where is your project based out from? -
Preparations for Consolidaton Group Chanes Process
Hi all
does any one ran Preparation for Consolidation Group change task @ Consolidation Monitor where moving OLD CONS GROUP to NEW CONS GROUP with mimimal changes in other words, as it is to NEW GROUP( change in PARENT UNIT)
my questions:
1. do we need to make any adjustment entries until AFD? think no Change except Parent Unit will change from OLD to NEW
2. Ending period is NEW CONS GROUP Creation @ CG master data level because the same period for PREP Cons Group task
3. how to handle Goodwill in this process where subs were 100% owned by parent units.
appreciated your comments/suggestions/help in advanceHi Dan
item No.2 is I have made ending period as 006/2009 for OLD CONS GROUP for all CONS UNITS
Yes, New CONS GROUP is 006/2010 to 012/9999
Please clarify one more thing:
CG1 001/2008 to 006/2010
CU-1 -> PU
CU-2
I....... CG21
CU - 2 ..> PU
CU-220
CU-221
I..... CG2210
- CU -221 ..> PU
CU -222
CU-3
new group: 006/2010 TO 012/9999
CGA 006/2010 to 012/9999
CU - A ...> PU
CU-2
I....... CG01
CU - 1 ..> PU
CU-220 A
CU-221A
I..... CG2210A
- CU -221 ..> PU
CU -222
CU-3
Question: Now in New CG01, CU-1 is no longer TOP PU and its CU-A ( which exist in 006/2010)
What is the process now? still need a transfer and or just ending for CU-1 as 001/2008 to 006/2010
appreciated your comments/help
Maybe you are looking for
-
Adapter Module .ear file deployed
Hi All, I have an adapter module deployed long back on my dev server. I want to retrive the same file from dev and deploy in on Quality server. Can you let me know the path where this .ear file will be present on the SAP XI server. Thx in advance Rav
-
Xfce4 - problem with fonts again... (especially k3b)
hi, i did a base install from the arch widget iso 0.6 and used pacman to install everything i need. i use xfce4. after installing licq i noticed the same font problem writen sevarel times in this forum (big font with large spaces) but in the options
-
Can't open appleworks as an attachment
When opening appleworks 6 in an email attachment, it says the document is locked and to open as a copy. This happens every time I try to open an appleworks 6 attachment in emails. Is this a fix for this? It shouldn't ask to open as a copy and why is
-
I need help. Desperately. I was trying to change my short name for my computer. Okay...stupid idea already, I know. So I changed the name of my home folder (from Betsy to Kate). So the only thing that happened was the name change. So then I change my
-
Dear all, at the moment I am dealing with the Packaging function of ICH 5.0. I have created a packaging specification. The "check" funcktion tells me, that the spec. is ok. But when I try to activate it I am getting the error message "Pack. spec. 100