Prevend UD (QA11) without Review (QE12)

In our business process, we have created three levels for Result recording, Review and UD through QE11, QE12 and QA11 respectively.
My requirement is when the Review (QE12) is not carried out or incomplete while doing the UD (user decision), the system should not be allowed to do UD.
Hence Analyst QE11 : Should have authority to valuate the results after recording,means the status of MIC after QE11 shall be "3".
Supervisior QE12: Shall have authority to lock the results after review , means the status of MIC shall change from "3" to "5" (Processing is completed)
Approvar QA11: System should not allow to select the UD code for if any characterisctics is pending for processing.
AYK

Hello,
You can use user profile for preventing the UD untile the MIC is having 5 stage
Please look into thislook and revert back
Link: [https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20fbc091-ea3a-2b10-f0a3-877ffbf36436]
please revert back with feedback
Regards
Gajesh

Similar Messages

How can I create an apple ID without having a credit card, for my IPad??

I´ve already created the ID, but I´m not allowed downloading apps without reviewing mi ID in the iTunes store. The problem is that while I`m reviewing my account, I´m asked to give a credit card number, etc. there is not another option, at least in the window that appears to me. The thing is that I don’t have a credit card.

If you only want the free apps, take a look here:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2534
Read the steps carefully as the order in which you follow them is critical. Note that you can do this only when creating a new Apple ID. You cannot use an existing ID.
You will of course not be able to get anything other than the free content without entering in some sort of payment method (credit card, prepaid iTunes card, gift certificate, etc.)
Regards.

Quality inspection without order confirmation

hi ther ........
I have created a process order & released it.
Now I am able to do quality result recording in QEN51N & Usage dicision in QA11 without process order confirmation.
how come this is possible without system throwing any kind of error ?

hi kaushik,
Regarding the inspection type details u can get in
SPRO->Quality Mangement->Quality Inspection->Inspection Lot Creation->Maintain Inspection type.
It gives the list of inspection types.
For more info.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/89/9bb43418e43b4ae10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
Cheers
Alfred
Reward with points if it is helps.

Looking for an Option to review/show the incorrect questions even if you pass the quiz? - CP4

In my quizzes our users need to get 85% to pass. If a user gets 90% I constantly asked “How do I know what question(s) I got wrong?” Once you have a passing mark the system says you have passed/completed and moves on. It would be very helpful to give users the option of reviewing the question(s) that were answered incorrectly without reviewing the whole quiz, even if they pass.

Hello Tom
you can find template webrfcsystemexception.html on your ITS installation under ...\<its home>\IG5\templates\system\dm\webrfcsystemexception.html
but all it does is actually to take the R/3 error messages and forward it to the user (~rfc_error_message).
Not sure what your problem is right now, but your ITS version seems to be ITS 6.20 Patch 9, which is almost 3.5 years old. I would assume your Backend kernel is much newer. That means your protocol stack is out of sync.
You should upgrade your ITS first and see if you still receive RFC errors.
best regards
Gerd

Cannot Review my Apple ID, it won't let me type in any of the boxes...

This is really annoying because, I can't sign in on iTunes without reviewing my Apple ID, can't do that either unless you let me type it in. Please, if anyone knows what I'm supposed to do, help me out, thanks.
I'm using latest iTunes, on Windows 7.

http://support.apple.com/kb/HE40

Without ud code my quality stock transfer into unrestricted

sir,
When i am doing ud in QA11 without ud code my quality stock transfer into unrestricted.is there any fucntional setting that without ud code quality stock not transfer INTO UNRESTRICTED.

Dear Prakash
There is a standard functionality for the same
please refer this link
Link: [http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/601c82e3-b743-2c10-dbb6-ed4c00167157]
Regards
Gajesh

Sun Java 3D looking glass now available - Package ?

Hi,
justread the following:
https://lg3d-core.dev.java.net/lg3ddevelopersguide.html
Project Looking Glass Open Source
Sun Microsystems is contributing Project Looking Glass, based on Java(tm) technology, to the open source community. Project Looking Glass is an exploration project to bring innovative 3D features to the desktop environment. The desktop interface will offer an intuitive, new 3D environment to interact with desktop applications featuring window transparency, rotation, zoom, multiple desktop workspaces and miniaturization.Project Looking Glass offers a platform to realize far richer and more entertaining user experience for existing and new applications in 2D or 3D. The technology enables developers to build highly visual 3D desktops and applications that will run on Linux systems such as Sun's Java Desktop System. The Solaris(tm) environment will be supported in near future.
What does this mean to you?
If you're a software developer, please go to http://enews.sun.com/CTServlet?id=63058 … 8531213971 and download this early version of the code and join the community in developing the 3D desktop.
Interested in using the Project Looking Glass? The project is in very early stages and a commercial version is not available yet. Please go to http://enews.sun.com/CTServlet?id=63058 … 8531213990 to keep up to date on our progress.
Why Open Source?
Project Looking Glass is in its infancy, and we'd like to explore lots of ideas and possibilities. We're releasing the Project Looking Glass code to the whole community to explore every aspect of the technology rather than restricting access to a privileged few. We believe this open development is an excellent model to pursue this exciting and vast opportunity. So, your involvement is eagerly anticipated. We believe new dimension of developer innovation by making Sun's cutting edge technology available at Sun's 3D Desktop Technology Open Source Project on java.net.
We have been working for several months on cleaning the software up, providing basic features and functionality key to 3D window management. A key focus was looking at the existing 2D desktop applications, ensuring minimal compatibility and performance problems. The next step is to look what else we can do to foster real world 3D interactivity. We decided to open source this at a very early stage to ensure that we got good feedback from the community.
What's in the Open Source Project?
The following features are now available in the Project Looking Glass open source release:
3D Window Manager Platform - Java 3D based highly scalable 3D platform with client-server model support.
3D Window Manager and Application Development API - Java API to develop new 3D desktop applications and 3D desktop Window Manager features.
Native Application Integration Module - Allows developers to run conventional X11 applications in the 3D environment.
Sample 3D Window Manager - provides a simple sample implementation for testing and demonstration purposes
3D Environment Lite - Enables developers to run a simplified 3D environment as an application on a Java 3D enabled platform including Linux and Solaris environments. This serves as a development tool to test implementations.
This is all available at: http://enews.sun.com/CTServlet?id=63058 … 8531213971
What's the licensing model?
There are three license choices for developers interested in creating applications using Project Looking Glass.
For developers who are interested in reviewing, revising, and redistributing the source code as part of their own application, Project Looking Glass has been submitted as an Open Source project on java.net under the GNU Public License, or GPL.
For developers who are interested in developing an application on top of the existing Project Looking Glass platform without reviewing and/or altering the code base, there is a binary version of the current state of the project available for download under a traditional Binary Code License. This is also available on java.net.
Finally, for developers or organizations interested in other uses or revising the source code but wish to keep their implementation and related application proprietary, please contact Sun at [email protected].
Project Looking Glass Community Meeting
Wednesday June 30, 2004
4:30pm to 6:00pm
The Argent Hotel, City Room
San Francisco, California, USA
http://www.argenthotel.com/location.htm
4:00-4:30 Registration
4:30-4:45 Welcome, Introductions, and 3D Desktop Project Demo
4:45-5:30 Technology Overview, Possible Sub Projects, How to Get Started
5:30-6:00 Q&A and Networking
Please join the conversation with the Project Looking Glass developers from Sun Microsystems. This meeting will be technically focused introducing developers to the project and letting them know how to get involved.
You can meet the team from "Project Looking Glass" and other developers while enjoying food and refreshments. There is open admission. You do not need a JavaOne Conference Pass to attend.
There will be no webcast available, but we will post the information available at the meeting on the website. We'll also have several presentations and Project Looking Glass at JavaOne, and we'll post as many as we can on the web.
You can see Hideya Kawahara on stage with Jonathan Schwartz and Scott McNealy of Sun Microsystems demonstrating the Project Looking Glass technology and announcing the open source project at http://enews.sun.com/CTServlet?id=63058 … 8531214001 (select View Webcast).
If you have any questions, please send them to: [email protected]
Sun's Project Looking Glass Team
To use our one-click unsubscribe facility, select the following URL:
http://subscriptions.sun.com/unsubscrib … 1002686649

Hi i found something like suns..loking glasses....
METISSE
http://insitu.lri.fr/~chapuis/metisse/index.html
PKGBUILD:
pkgname=metisse
pkgver=0.3.1
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="A real 3D-Desktop"
url=""
license="GPL"
depends=('xfree86' 'nucleo')
source=(http://insitu.lri.fr/~chapuis/software/metisse/metisse-0.3.1.tar.bz2)
build() {
cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver
./configure --prefix=/usr
make || return 1
make prefix=$startdir/pkg/usr install
PKGBUILD of nucleo
pkgname=nucleo
pkgver=0.1
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="Nucleo library (needed by metisse)"
url=""
license="GPL"
depends=('xfree86')
source=(http://insitu.lri.fr/~chapuis/software/metisse/nucleo-0.1-20040705.tar.bz2)
build() {
cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver
./configure --prefix=/usr
make || return 1
make prefix=$startdir/pkg/usr install
btw. you need gcc 3.4 not 3.4.1
and if metisse don´t want to compile ..like
ametista.cxx: In function `int main(int, char**)':
ametista.cxx:88: error: array bound forbidden after parenthesized type-id
ametista.cxx:88: note: try removing the parentheses around the type-id
make: *** [ametista.o] Error 1"
you should patch the file src/metisse-0.3.1/FvwmAmetista/main/ametista.cxx:88
before: char **user_arg char **user_argv = new (char *) [user_argc] ;
after : char **user_argv = new char * [user_argc] ;
sorry but i dont know howto create patch files ...feel free to make a patch
hoppe you find this software as funny as i do
mattux

Do you trust the SAP standard rule set ?

Hello all,
I have the impression that, too often, the SAP standard ruleset has been taken for granted : upload, generate and use. Here is a post as to why not to do so. Hopefuly, this will generate a interesting discussion.
As I have previously stated in other threads, you should be very careful accepting the SAP standard rule set without reviewing it first. Before accepting it, you should ensure that your specific SAP environment has been reflected in the functions. The 2 following questions deal with this topic :
1. what is your SAP release ? ---> 46C is different than ECC 6.0 in terms of permissions to be included in the function permission tab. With every SAP release, new authorization objects are linked to SAP standard tcodes. Subsequently some AUTHORITY-CHECK statements have been adapted in the ABAP behind the transaction code. So, other authorizations need to provided from an implementation point of view (PFCG). And thus, from an audit perspective (GRC-CC), other settings are due when filtering users' access rights in search for who can do what in SAP.
2. what are your customizing settings and master data settings ? --> depending on these answers you will have to (de)activate certain permissions in your functions. Eg. are authorization groups for posting periods, business areas, material types, ... being used ? If this is not required in the SAP system and if activated in SAP GRC function, then you filter down your results too hard, thereby leaving certain users out of the audit report while in reality they can actually execute the corresponding SAP functionality --> risk for false negatives !
Do not forget that the SAP standard ruleset is only an import of SU24 settings of - probably - a Walldorf system. That's the reason SAP states that the delivered rule set is a starting point.
So, the best practice is :
a. collect SAP specific settings per connector in a separate 'questionnaire' document, preferably structured in a database
b. reflect these answers per function per connector per action per permission by correctly (de)activating the corresponding permissions for all affected functions
You can imagine that this is a time-consuming process due to the amount of work and the slow interaction with the Java web-based GRC GUI. Therefore, it is a quite cumbersome and at times error-prone activity ...... That is, in case you would decide to implement your questionnaire answers manually. There are of course software providers on the market that can develop and maintain your functions in an off-line application and generate your rule set so that you can upload it directly in SAP GRC. In this example such software providers are particularly interesting, because your questionnaire answers are structurally stored and reflected in the functions. Any change now or in the future can be mass-reflected in all (hundreds / thousands of) corresponding permissions in the functions. Time-saving and consistent !
Is this questionnaire really necessary ? Can't I just activate all permissions in every function ? Certainly not, because that would - and here is the main problem - filter too much users out of your audit results because the filter is too stringent. This practice would lead too false negatives, something that auditors do not like.
Can't I just update all my functions based on my particular SU24 settings ? (by the way, if you don't know what SU24 settings are, than ask your role administrator. He/she should know. ) Yes, if you think they are on target, yes you can by deleting all VIRSA_CC_FUNCPRM entries from the Rules.txt export of the SAP standard rule set, re-upload, go for every function into change mode so that the new permissions are imported based on your SU24 settings. Also, very cumbersome and with the absolute condition that you SU24 are maintained excellent.
Why is that so important ? Imagine F_BKPF_GSB the auth object to check on auth groups on business areas within accounting documents. Most role administrator will leave this object on Check/Maintain in the SU24 settings. This means that the object will be imported in the role when - for example - FB01 has been added in the menu. But the role administrator inactivates the object in the role. Still no problem, because user doesn't need it, since auth groups on business areas are not being used. However, having this SU24 will result in an activated F_BKPF_GSB permission in your GRC function. So, SAP GRC will filter down on those users who have F_BKPF_GSB, which will lead to false negatives.
Haven't you noticed that SAP has deactivated quite a lot of permissions, including F_BKPF_GSB ? Now, you see why. But they go too far at times and even incorrect. Example : go ahead and look deeper into function AP02. There, you will see for FB01 that two permissions have been activated. F_BKPF_BEK and F_BKPF_KOA. The very basic authorizations needed to be able to post FI document are F_BKPF_BUK and F_BKPF_KOA. That's F_BKPF_BUK .... not F_BKPF_BEK. They have made a mistake here. F_BKPF_BEK is an optional auth object (as with F_BKPF_GSB) to check on vendor account auth groups.
Again, the message is : be very critical when looking at the SAP standard rule set. So, test thoroughly. And if your not sure, leave the job to a specialized firm.
Success !
Sam

Sam and everyone,
Sam brings up some good points on the delivered ruleset. Please keep in mind; however, that SAP has always stated that the delivered ruleset is a starting point. This is brought up in sap note 986996     Best Practice for SAP CC Rules and Risks. I completely agree with him that no company should just use the supplied rules without doing a full evaluation of their risk and control environment.
I'll try to address each area that Sam brings up:
1. Regarding the issue with differences of auth objects between versions, the SAP delivered rulset is not meant to be version specific. We therefore provide rules with the lowest common denominator when it comes to auth object settings.
The rules were created on a 4.6c system, with the exception of transactions that only exist in higher versions.
The underlying assumption is that we want to ensure the rules do not have any false negatives. This means that we purposely activate the fewest auth objects required in order to execute the transaction.
If new or different auth object settings come into play in the higher releases and you feel this results in false positives (conflicts that show that don't really exist), then you can adjust the rules to add these auth objects to the rules.
Again, our assumption is that the delivered ruleset should err on the side of showing too many conflicts which can be further filtered by the customer, versus excluding users that should be reported.
2. For the customizing settings, as per above, we strive to deliver rules that are base level rules that are applicable for everyone. This is why we deliver only the core auth objects in our rules and not all. A example is ME21N.
If you look at SU24 in an ECC6 system, ME21N has 4 auth objects set as check/maintain. However, in the rules we only enable one of the object, M_BEST_BSA. This is to prevent false negatives.
3. Sam is absolutely right that the delivered auth object settings for FB01 have a mistake. The correct auth object should be F_BKPF_BUK and not F_BKPF_BEK. This was a manual error on my part. I've added this to a listing to correct in future versions of the rules.
4. Since late 2006, 4 updates have been made to the rules to correct known issues as well as expand the ruleset as needed. See the sap notes below as well as posting Compliance Calibrator - Q2 2008 Rule Update from July 22.
1083611 Compliance Calibrator Rule Update Q3 2007
1061380 Compliance Calibrator Rule Update Q2 2006
1035070 Compliance Calibrator Rule Update Q1 2007
1173980 Risk Analysis and Remediation Rule Update Q2 2008
5. SAP is constantly working to improve our rulesets as we know there are areas where the rules can be improved. See my earlier post called Request for participants for an Access Control Rule mini-council from January 28, 2008. A rule mini-council is in place and I welcome anyone who is interested in joining to contact me at the information provided in that post.
6. Finally, the document on the BPX location below has a good overview of how companies should review the rules and customize them to their control and risk environment:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/bpx-grc
Under Key Topics - Access Control; choose document below:
    o GRC Access Control - Access Risk Management Guide   (PDF 268 KB)
The access risk management guide helps you set up and implement risk
identification and remediation with GRC Access Control.

Has anyone else run in to the dishonesty of Verizon when it comes to keeping unlimited data?

I have been a Verizon customer for about 20 years.
I heard about people saying that their customer service was no good, but I personally haven't had problems with them.... UNTIL NOW :-(
When they stopped offering the unlimited data plan I was disappointed, but I followed the what I was told and purchased the phones for the full price so that I wouldn't loose my unlimited data.
When I went into Best Buy the rep told me about an alternate upgrade that I could do and upgrade a phone on my plan and switch it to my phone number. That way it will show that I never did an upgrade on my personal line. So I went along with it making it clear that I didn't want to loose my unlimited data. When she entered the information in the software would let her override something there and she called Verizon customer service. The representative assured me that it was standard procedure and that the unlimited data would be retained with no problems.
3 days later. it wasn't resolved and even though my line shows that it has not been upgraded the plan was changed. Another "ticket" was submitted and denied. Basically they just deny tickets without reviewing the specifics. I then spoke to another representative that said there should be no problem and that they see this type of situation all of the time. She submitted another ticket requesting the unlimited data to be put back on my account. I didn't hear anything from anyone.
2 weeks later they I talk to another representative that tells me the same thing there shouldn't be a problem the previous representative submitted the requests improperly and that he has dealt with this before and that it should go through no problem. I had no choice, but to trust that this person knew what they were talking about, they kept telling me that there was nobody else I could talk to that it will go through.
I had to leave the country for a couple of weeks. I come back and my account is still incorrect. So I call again. This time I talk to Gyann (removed)... he said that he again "knows what he is doing" he is putting the request it and that he will make sure that he takes care of me. I also talk to his supervisor Sander (removed). Who assured me that he would follow up with the submitted request and would call me back agh 10:30am eastern time to make sure everything was going through. I waited for the call.. no call. I called Sander at later that day only to get a voicemail.
I then called customer care again and they told me that in the notes Sander wrote that he called me and wasn't able to get a hold of me. There was no message on my phone and no missed calls in my call log. when did he try to call? Standly (removed) told me that the person that could escalate my issue is the supervisor that I have been dealing with, Sander, who I can't get a hold of and isn't calling me back. Otherwise he is going to have to start from scratch. I asked how I am supposed to escalate an issue wight he same person that i was dealing with if they generally don't give out direct numbers and every customer service rep "will see the notes".
Here we go waiting more time tomorrow dealing with this again.
Point is Verizon doesn't care about their customers. They make it difficult to correct any problems, but are sure on top of it when it comes to billing someone when they never agreed to the plan.
>> Personal information removed to comply with the Verizon Wireless Terms of Service <<
Message was edited by: Verizon Moderator

flip4uina2
They care about customers, but unfortunately, they don't, and won't, care that you lost unlimited data. You will be the second person in two years that I've seen have unlimited data reinstated. They will do anything in their power to keep it away from you.

How to keep a notification message in my lock screen?

For instance, when I receive an SMS I get a notification message in my lock screen. After that, if I unlock my phone, without reviewing/opening the iMessage app, and then I lock it again, is there any way to keep my SMS notification in the lock screen?
Thanks

Hi Sudheer,
U can create a message say "Test" in message pool of Type Info. u can use this message for displaying info messages as shown below.
wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportMessage(IMessage<ur component name>.Test);
i am not sure about the image, just try this.
Thanks and Regards

Official NFCU CLI Guide

You have a Q?I have an A! Q: Is it possible to know before requesting if my account will be eligible without a HP? A: If you access your full Equifax report and look at SP/Promotional Inquiries you will see (NAVY AR) and they will be every 3 months like clock work once you see the first one... IF at any time you are going to have a better chance of a sp increase it will be after that AR has been done. Q: I currently only have a $1k limit, won't asking for $25k just get my request Flat out Denied or HP for sure because of the large request?A: All data shows that Navy allows requests up to $25k without review IF your account is eligible so if you request just $5k and it's instantly granted than you have left CL available to you by not asking for the full $25k and getting the instant counter. Q: I get a message "A CONDITION EXISTS ON MY ACCOUNT AND I NEED TO CALL" Does that mean a SP CLI is not available?A: This is an INTERNET ERROR with Navy, it has nothing to do with your account being able to get a CLI or not... you need to use Firefox, Chrome, Clear cookies, Clear Browser history and close out and restart in one of those browsers and try again. DO NOT CALL! Q: I have been thinking about a Second Navy Card OR I applied for a Second Navy Card but was declined?A: Use to be easiest to ask through secure message to have some of your credit line from the first card MOVED to the 2nd card that you were just declined for to have it approved... sometimes you can call and have the request submitted also... If you are told no, try calling instead of secure message, or hang up and try again in a little bit... If a rep tells you no, they just don't know! Find the one that does know! Q: How much of my current CL should I move to open the 2nd Card?A: I'll use $25k as your current limit on your 1st card... Move $20k of your 1st card to open your 2nd card. Q: Why would I move so much of my 1st Card to open the 2nd card?A: (The secret is out but don't scream it out loud we don't want it to stop ) Once you see your 1st card updated on your log in with the new reduced limit and the new 2nd card listed with the new limit you moved from your 1st card... Request a CLI on your 1st card back to the limit it had BEFORE you moved limit to open the 2nd card, it will instantly approve it! Q: When should I apply for NAVCheck/Checking Line of Credit (Navy has changed the name I believe) and for how much?A: 1. Join Navy. 2. Apply for a Credit Card. 3. Apply for NavCheck 4. ALWAYS ASK FOR $15k (Just like with Credit Cards, Navy will counter if not the full amount and you can't ever ask for to much, it's called a counter for a reason!) Q: When should I apply for my 2nd Navy Card?A: EITHER when you hit $25k on your first card within 6 months OR After you successfully get your first SP CLI (Usually 3-6 months in my opinion) Q: I received NavCheck but not for the full $15k, When should I go back and ask for CLI to $15k again?A: After you successfully get your first SP CLI on your 1st credit card (It was about 3 months after opening for me)

Alaskagurl wrote:
I hope thats right Creditaddict, If not I will have like 20 hp's for all that instant. I will not ask for anything for another 5 years lmao...You are one of the latest that I hope confirms my thinking of just asking for $25k right out of the gate because you had to go back 10x and others have done this recently.The only experience I have is on my partners card and he was at $25k and asking for $35 resulted in 3-5 day and a HP but was approved, so I don't know if that's a over $25k thing or if he just would have gotten the HP regardless.... I hope to soon be adding some more cards so I can test the theory more later possibly! haha but for now....I think the other added note is Navy doesn't much seem to care about INQ, even if they do pull!

Where can I find the files using up my external hard drive?

I have a 1TB iMac and have two external hard drives attached to keep the computer free of hard drive use for two reasons: Disk 1-is a 250GB hard drive I have dedicated to perform Time Machine backups of my home folder. Disk 2-is a smaller 120GB hard drive I keep my compete iTunes library of music in case the computer has a malfunction, so all the work I've done putting the library together will be secure. Here's the thing...the iMac's hard drive is hardly used, just as I want containing about 150GB total. Meanwhile, the Time Machine disk is nearly full with 225GB used, and just 25GB remainibg. The hard drive with the iTunes files looks pretty good too using about 70GB of it's 120GB. I believe Time Machine is in no way, backups the iTunes library just the iMac.
How can I figure out where the additional space is getting used up on that disk? I do have a couple of extra logins I use for alternate use such as a different iPhoto library I want kept seperate from mine, but I did not think the backup was saving those files as they are not even under the Time Machine setup.
Can anyone advise why the backup is larger than the use of the computer? I knew when I dedicated a smaller hard drive to back up a larger one that it was possible the backup drive would get too full, but I can figure out what's happening. I've erased the Time Machine disk and allowed it do a completlely new backup and again, it's always sigificantly larger.
Thanks!

Okay...I have some more information and perhaps we are getting closer. On the 250GB, first I went into that disk and used Disk Utilty to re-format it once using Mac OS Extended (Journaled) then a second time, zeroing it out. I did a screen shot to review if needed, and both times it looked perfect...249GB available. Then I went into the Time Machine preferences to get ready to backup again, and it had not excluded the other external 120GB with iTunes so I excluded it. I may has previously, never noticed in that screen that it takes a bit of time for it to calculate the information to save. I may have just clicked on it quickly without reviewing it first. Today I did, and gave it time to calculate. At one point the actual 250GB itself, showed up and I excluded it too like the 120GB. After it finished, the calculations are still it wrong - claiming it has a 200GB backup when the iMac either contains 150GB (based on when I do Get Info) on it or from OmniDisk which calculated about 100GB. I have not allowed Time Machine to do a backup yet, until this discrepancy can be clear.
One thing that I thought I had seen or reviewed previous on the Time Machine settings was my home folder - I could be wrong but wanted to mention that. Another little tidbit to ponder an well is that I have a files of icons that I use for the Hard Disks, and a few folders where I Get Info on the Icon and on the destination and just cut and paste. I did that today to the 250GB after zeroing, but while I was in the Time Machine settings the change was deleted and neither the manufactures icon was there nor mine, and it has the default blue-green one the software uses. I know, because my sister's is that way on her system-unchanged.
Feedback?

USAA World Mastercard approved $16k, NFCU credit limit increase doubled to $20k!

It's about time ladies and gentlemen!
12.99% for NFCU platinum12.90% for USAA World Mastercard Rewards.
Full USAA member (I think?) I have Auto, Home, Personal Property Insurance with them. Also Checking, Savings, Stock account. Former enlisted, medically retired. I had a Classic card with USAA since 2011. I didn't know at the time that I couldn't increase the $1k credit limit with that card. They were charging me a shocking 22.9% apr, but I luckily never carried a balance after the first 6 months of using it. Usually would charge most of my stuff on it and pay in full. The NFCU started me off at a $10k credit limit a few years ago and I was really happy with the 12.99% and the first real bigger card. Everyone else was only offering me $1k and I was very happy with the larger limit. I do believe that this was also high because I had opened a secured credit card for $10k, yes I had cash at the time but no credit. I ended up closing that account and getting my money out when the NFCU was accepted. I truly believe that the lenders look at other credit limits to also base off what they offer you as a credit limit. Lately though I was getting recked by the high utilization on my NFCU 10k limit as I had just gotten married and luckily we recieved plenty of cash and gifts to cover everything.
So anyways after hanging up with USAA after learning about my classic card with them and not being able to increase credit limit nor change APR, I applied for a USAA World Rewards online and instant approval for $16k @12.9%! This is going to be my main earn some points and pay in full card. I just wanted more overhead so that I could spend without worrying about my utilization ratios. And I've been with USAA for 6 years now. About a few hours after I got the itch to bump up my $10k limit on NFCU, because I had brought the high limit to about $10,125 at one point. And after lurking for years on this site and reading up on asking for the max limit without review, I did the $25k credit limit increase online. They countered with $20k! I accepted! I just sent a message to see if they could reduce my interest rate and we shall see within the next few days.
Never had a late payment on my report, but was a bad boy at 18-19 years old. About 3 years ago everything bad off my credit fell off from the 7 year rule. I had some late payments and such at 18 years old. I ended up disputing them on annual credit report to verify the numbers are correct and they ended up removing the bad ones luckily!
I want to say my score is in the mid 720s. But my vantage score that shows on the credit cards is 699, probably due to that high 9k balance on the Navy Fed that hasn't reflected on the reports yet. I do shop at Costco a lot but never had their AMEX. But was thinking of applying for the Visa rate advantage with USAA to use at Costco. My mom added me as an authorized user on her AMEX for costco so she could get points. But I called AMEX and canceled my authorized user account with them a few months back. I disputed online that I never signed anything and was added on by my mother. Transunion removed the AMEX and another card I was authorized on (barclays) but experian just reported them as closed. Wondering also if this hurt my average age of accounts. My credit sesame shows about 3 years and 6 months for my average age. So currently have my $16k limit with USAA World Mastercard$20k limit with NFCU PlatinumOnly two credit cards as I canceled my $1k limit classic crap card. Have one car loan open now and one mortgage. Had many car loans, about 2 car refi's, even had 3 car loans open at one time during my high 680ish scores. Lots of utilization I guess, they say they hate it, but they secretely love a good comeback story.

Thanks everyone! Wanted to update that Navy Fed denied my APR decrease and they said I could do it once a year. Eh, 12.99 isn't too bad. Also wanted to add that I got my first VA loan when I was around 620ish and I brought it up from 580 a few months before.

Flickering Mainform when popup form is shown

Hi
on my project, i have my mainform that stays on from the start. I have a smaller popup form that shows when i have some settings to update. Whe nthe popup form (or just another form), the main form flickers terribly and the controls on the mainform temporarily
go grey and then refresh themselves.
Is there any way to stop this?
before i click to show the form
as i click to load the settings form
Thanks
Nacho is the derivative of Nigel &quot;True fact!&quot;

Hi
on my project, i have my mainform that stays on from the start. I have a smaller popup form that shows when i have some settings to update. Whe nthe popup form (or just another form), the main form flickers terribly and the controls on the mainform temporarily
go grey and then refresh themselves.
Is there any way to stop this?
There may be a latency during the initialization of your form. There is no absolute telling without reviewing your code. I suggest making sure that all information in the popup form is "ready" before showing it. Make sure that you aren't making
unnecessary calls to populate your main form on recurring events. For more detailed information on your problem, if your code is sensitive and you do not wish to share it with the world, then create an example project that re-creates the problem, and provide
that.
“If you want something you've never had, you need to do something you've never done.”
Don't forget to mark
helpful posts and answers
! Answer an interesting question? Write a
new article
about it! My Articles
*This post does not reflect the opinion of Microsoft, or its employees.

Cp6 Quiz score reporting error in LMS

Looking for any inputs - this one's a bit strange:
I've been tasked with developing a course that allows the learner to test-out by jumping directly to the quiz. I've set up a series of advanced actions that allow one shot at the quiz without reviewing the course content, and actions that steer the learner back into the course after failing the quiz. All of these actions work, and the quiz score reports correctly each time within the course - the problem is what happens after that:
I leave the course and go to the learner profile on the LMS - instead of 100%, the score is reporting as 75% (4 question prototype). I've set preferences to complete the course and report the score - the course reports complete, the only error is the incorrectly reported score. When I leave the transcript page and go back to the course, the course opens to the last question in the quiz, rather than the last page visited - and the question is not completed. Is this a setting I'm missing on the Cp6 side, or do I need to interface with the IT guys running the LMS? I'm running Cp6 with the most current patches on a Meridian LMS.
Justenuf

In answer to Rod's suggestion to set the score to percentage:
Done - the client prefers that report anyway. Still seeing the stuff as described below.
In answer to Erik's questions above:
after the quiz, you have a quiz results screen that shows all the information you'd expect, right?
Right - the quiz results screen in the course shows the score achieved
If they passed, how do they close the lesson?
The "Continue" button on the results screen is set up to take them to a completion page. that page has an "exit" button that takes them out of the lesson and back to the LMS.
Does the LMS report the same result as the summary page?
Yes if the quiz is set up to "submit all" answers at once in Quiz:Settings. (However, this is not my client's preferred set-up - so I'm still searching for the answers below)
No if you have the quiz submit each answer individually - see below:
The scores reported on the results screens for the quizzes in the red box above were 100, 90, 80 and 80, respectively.
If they fail the lesson, how are they redirected back to the content?
The "Continue" button on the quiz results page is set up to jump to the first page of content if the score is below passing.
Then they go through the content?
Yes - its required at that point.
how do they retake the quiz?
the "next" button on the last content slide takes them directly to the quiz.
If they retake it, does the summary slide show the correct information?
In the "submit all" mode - this all works perfectly.
If set up to submit after each answer, if you fail the quiz and exit the course before retaking it, the score is reported correctly in the transcript - it seems as if it defaults to the minimum passing score in when you submit each answer individually.
again, how do they then proceed to close the lesson?
They exit the lesson using the "Exit" button, which closes it and takes them back to the LMS.
I'd suggest adding a 'continue' button to that summary slide (if there's not one already) and instruct the user to click, take them to a 'congratulations' page and instructions to now close the lesson.
Done - see above.
Do you have the lesson reporting 'after every slide' or 'send data at end'? If none of the above options help, try changing it from one to the other (in the 'template' options).
I've set it using the submit all checkbox in Quiz:Settings - not sure how to access template options - is this a menu I'm unable to find?
Thanks again for your time on this -
Justenuf

Prevend UD (QA11) without Review (QE12)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for