Prevent Rounding on Third-Party PO

We use a Third-Party process, whereby a Sales Order is created including items with a certain Item Category. Workflow then converts the Requisition into a PO. Generally this process works, however we can get into a bit of a problem if the Master Data is not setup correctly. If the appropriate Purchase Info Record is missing, the PO item quantity will be rounded up to the Rounding Value from the MRP1 view in the Material Master. For example, the Customer orders a quantity of 6 EA, and the PO quantity rounds to 5,000 EA ! I realise that if the correct process is followed, and the PIRs are correctly maintained, this is not an issue. However, when it goes wrong (which it does occasionally), it can get quite messy, and very time-consuming to resolve.
I cannot see why, logically, anyone would want to round the quantity on a Third Party PO, given it's very nature - if you want to round, do it on the Sales Order. Therefore I am a little suprised that I cannot find any config to control this at either the PO Header or Item level, or that SAP didn't hard-code it. I would be grateful for any assistance.
Cheers, Paul.

you have to see the processes separatly.
Rounding in sales order serves your outbound requirements e.g. that the order quantity is a multiple of a unit (e.g. if you sell in drums a 200 kgm then you want only 200, 400, 600 allow in the SO)
Rounding in material master serves the general storage and procurement requirements.
Rounding in info record may serve specific procurement requirements, maybe under price aspects.
In case of 3rd party order you may have conflicts between sales and purchasing process, you can always change the unwanted rounding in the PO back to its original value, it will then not round again.
But can you explain why you round to 5 in material master MRP views, while you round to 6 in sales orders? From my point of view it is quite strange that you define the rounding for one and the same material differently, even it is in different processes.

Similar Messages

  • Prevent Third Party / Sales order stock for blocked vendors

    Hi Experts.
    We have scenarios for Third party processing and Sales order stock. We have a scenario of a fixed vendor for a material. The purchasing function frequently does block vendors for purchasing.
    However, we find that this does not prevent creation of a third party / sales order stock item in the sales order and a PR is generated. It is only found during the PR --> PO conversion that the vendor is blocked at which time someone has to manually reject the line items.
    Is there a way to prevent the system from being able to generate a PR for a blocked vendor ? I guess one possibility is to enhance the requirement routine for PR creation. Is there any other approach ?
    Appreciate your help
    Regards
    Rohit Zalani

    Hi
    In MK05, block vendor for all Purchasing org and Select Block Function = 03     Block quot. req., order, goods receipt
    If you do this setting then user will get error message that "Vendor is blocked" and "Purchase requisition could not be generated for component".

  • How do I prevent unauthorized third party launch of my browser?

    With all the concern for security I just can't understand why a third party program can just open my browser without permission or warning and load any page it pleases. I install a new program or update an old and it opens a Thank You or Getting Started page. I uninstall a program and it opens a Reason For Leaving survey. I click a button in a memory intensive game and here comes Firefox to suck up the rest of my RAM and cause a crash.
    At least with the combined protections of Mozilla and my anti-virus I needn't worry too much about being taken to a malicious site or other evil applications of this vulnerability but it's annoying. Shouldn't the decision to open Firefox (or any program) be mine alone?

    ''OGRastamon wrote:''
    I don't understand. If a web browser can't know from whence an application is launched then how could another program.
    If your firewall or other security software has this feature, you can set up rules for dealing with this. For example, by default you could prevent external applications from launching web browsers. You could then set up rules for specific applications to allow them to launch web browsers. That way you could still click links in an e-mail client and open them in a browser, for instance.
    ''OGRastamon wrote:''
    Did you mean that Firefox does not currently detect this? That it is not possible to implement?
    As far as I know, no browser allows you to ignore links launched by external applications. You can request this feature by submitting an enhacement bug report, if a relevant one doesn't already exist.
    * https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Mozilla/QA/Bug_writing_guidelines
    ''OGRastamon wrote:''
    If by my "computer's application page" you mean "set program access and computer defaults" then no, it does not work. The only options are any of your installed browsers or your current browser.
    You could break the association for the HTTP and HTTPS protocols in the registry, but I don't recommend it.
    <pre><nowiki>HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Shell\Associations\UrlAssociations\http\UserChoice
    HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Shell\Associations\UrlAssociations\https\UserChoice
    </nowiki></pre>

  • Credit Check with Third Party Process

    Hi Gurz,
    I know about third party process but my problem is with credit check of the customers.
    If customer has not got enough credit limit to process the order in normal senario credit controller has to manually release the order as system blocks it. In third party process system will give you warning message when saving sales order about customer credit limit but allows you to save sales order. Once saving sales order it authomatically creates Purchase Requisition. From PR purchasing creates P.O. with out knowing about customer credit limit issue. and so on. In other words goods supplied to customer even though credit limit has exceeded. This user don't know untill raising the invoice to the customer which is too late.
    Can we stop creating Purchase requisition or block purchase requistion for credit check ? or there are better way of handling the process for credit check?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    Try to implement OSS note -738171 - Delivery block does not influence purchase requisition.
    Following is the details of the note;
    Summary
    Symptom
    The delivery block in a sales order does not prevent the generattion of the purchase requisition in a third-party or individual purchase order item. Regardless of the Customizing settings in the delivery block, the system confirms the TAB or TAS item and generates the purchase requisition.
    More Terms
    Order, purchase requisition, PReq, TAB, individual purchase order, individual purchase order item, TAS, third-party, third-party item, SD order, delivery block, VBAK-LIFSK, VBEP-LIFSP
    Cause and Prerequisites
    Solution
    Create a user-specific user requirement (for example, 902: BEDINGUNG_PRUEFEN_902 in Include LV07A902) as a copy of standard user requirement 102 and assign it to requirement 'Preq' by using Transaction OVB5.
    In the source code of the user-requirement, program a check for the delivery block which, if necessary, triggers an ERROR_EXCEPTION which prevents the generation of the purchase requisition.
    You can use the existing check for the credit block as a template.
    Regards,

  • Question on Third Party Payroll Check in XML Publisher

    Hi:
    I have created an XML Third Party Check report that is based on the queries found in the seeded Oracle PAYUSGAR.rdf 115.24 check report. The patch 9211869 fixed an issue in the standard report where multiple checks for the same employee to the same payee for the same amount were NOT printing the correct garnishment reference number. I have reviewed the report code but have not been able to fix this same issue through XML.
    My queries will produce all of the correct data except the 2nd duplicate (same employee to the same payee for the same amount) prints the reference number from the 1st element rather than the 2nd. Does anyone know how the check data is tied to the elements through the tables?
    My example is:
    Person: Max Doe Check: 1234 Paid to: California Agency Check Amount: 121.00 Pre_payment_id: 766297 Ref # 4567
    Person: Max Doe Check: 1234 Paid to: California Agency Check Amount: 121.00 Pre_payment_id: 766302 Ref # 657AA
    (Ref # 657AA prints on the second check as Ref # 4567)
    The query from the report is:
    SELECT peev.screen_entry_value garn_ref_no
    ,:check_amount
    ,TO_CHAR(pay_us_payment_pkg.get_trx_date(
    :business_group_id,
    :ppa_payroll_action_id,
    NULL,
    :ppa_payroll_id,
    :ppa_consolidation_set_id,
    :ppa_org_payment_method_id,
    :ppa_effective_date,
    :ppa_date_earned,
    :ppa_override_date,
    ppp.pre_payment_id,
    ppa.effective_date
    ),'DD-MON-YYYY') payment_date
    ,TO_CHAR(ppa.date_earned, 'DD-MON-YYYY')
    ,prr_att.run_result_id
    ,peef.entry_information2 -- FIPS code
    ,peef.entry_information3 -- Medical Indicator
    ,paa.assignment_action_id
    ,pet.element_type_id
    FROM pay_element_entry_values_f peev,
    pay_input_values_f piv_att,
    pay_element_entries_f peef,
    pay_run_results prr_att,
    pay_run_results prr_pay,
    pay_payroll_actions ppa,
    pay_assignment_actions paa,
    pay_action_interlocks pai,
    pay_pre_payments ppp,
    pay_input_values_f piv_pay,
    pay_run_result_values prrv_att,
    pay_run_result_values prrv_pay,
    pay_element_types_f pet,
    pay_element_types_f pet_calc,
    pay_element_classifications pec
    WHERE ROUND(ppp.VALUE ,2) = :check_amount
    AND ppp.pre_payment_id = :pre_payment_id
    AND ppp.assignment_action_id = pai.locking_action_id
    AND pai.locked_action_id = paa.assignment_action_id
    AND ppa.payroll_action_id = paa.payroll_action_id
    AND ppa.action_type IN ('R', 'Q')
    AND ((paa.source_action_id IS NOT NULL AND ppa.run_type_id IS NOT NULL) OR
    (paa.source_action_id IS NULL AND ppa.run_type_id IS NULL))
    AND ppp.personal_payment_method_id = peef.personal_payment_method_id
    AND peef.assignment_id = paa.assignment_id
    AND ppa.date_earned BETWEEN peev.effective_start_date
    AND peev.effective_end_date
    AND ppa.date_earned BETWEEN peef.effective_start_date
    AND peef.effective_end_date
    AND piv_att.input_value_id = peev.input_value_id
    AND UPPER(piv_att.NAME) = 'ATTACHMENT NUMBER'
    AND ppa.effective_Date BETWEEN piv_att.effective_start_date
    AND piv_att.effective_end_date
    AND piv_att.input_value_id = prrv_att.input_value_id
    AND prrv_att.result_value = peev.screen_entry_value
    AND prrv_att.run_result_id = prr_att.run_result_id
    AND paa.assignment_Action_id = prr_att.assignment_Action_id
    AND prr_att.element_type_id = peef.element_type_id
    AND peef.element_type_id = pet.element_type_id
    AND pet.classification_id = pec.classification_id
    AND pec.classification_name = 'Involuntary Deductions'
    AND pec.legislation_code = 'US'
    AND pec.business_group_id IS NULL
    AND fnd_number.canonical_to_number(pet.element_information5) = pet_calc.element_type_id
    AND pet_calc.element_name LIKE pet.element_name || '%Calculator'
    AND pet_calc.element_type_id = piv_pay.element_type_id
    AND NVL(ppa.date_earned, ppa.effective_date) BETWEEN piv_pay.effective_start_date AND piv_pay.effective_end_date
    AND piv_pay.input_value_id = prrv_pay.input_value_id
    AND UPPER(piv_pay.NAME) = 'PAY VALUE'
    AND fnd_number.number_to_canonical(ppp.VALUE) = prrv_pay.result_value
    AND prr_pay.run_result_id = prrv_pay.run_result_id
    AND prr_pay.assignment_action_id = paa.assignment_action_id
    AND prr_pay.element_type_id = pet_calc.element_type_id
    ORDER BY prr_att.run_result_id;
    Somehow, Oracle has fixed this in the rdf but I have not been able to figure out how exactly. This is a function call in the report but they are passing the check amount and the prepayment_id. Regardless of which pre_payment_id is sent in, 2 rows are returned.
    If anyone has any thoughts, please let me know. This is the final tweak that is stopping our go-live with this.
    Thanks, RL

    In bug 6779249 it states that third party checks are not supported for XML...
    But, as we have bought into the push to convert we now are down to payroll checks and third party checks to get our company off of Optio once and for all...
    Other than attempting to write a complete custom process from scratch (just to throw out next year when we upgrade to 12) does anyone have any solutions to getting 3rd party checks to print with BIP in Oracle Applications (11.5.10)?
    Scott

  • Third Party Tools To Upgrade WSS 3.0 to SharePoint Foundation 2013?

    Since you cannot upgrade WSS 3.0 directly to SharePoint Foundation 2013 using just the SharePoint software, I wanted to look at 3rd party tools that automate the migration directly to 2013 without requiring an intermediate upgrade to 2010.
    We have a simple WSS 3.0 farm with 2 SharePoint Servers and 2 SQL servers that are are load balanced so that the site stays up if any one of the servers goes down.  It may be just round robin load balancing.
    I'd like to see if I can determine if any of these migration tools would save enough time and effort for this type of environment to be worth the cost.  It would be nice if we could do the upgrade all in once day instead of having 2 outages.

    HI,There are third party tools to upgrade sharepoint but not from wss 3.0 to directly sharepoint 2013.Its not at all possible as I know.Please find the below link that clearly explains the Upgrade process.
    http://expertsharepoint.blogspot.de/2014/03/sharepoint-up-gradationmoss2007.html
    Anil Avula[MCP,MCSE,MCSA,MCTS,MCITP,MCSM] See Me At: http://expertsharepoint.blogspot.de/
    It looks like there are such products.  
    This one says it can be used to migrate directly from even WSS 2.0 to SharePoint 2013.
    http://www.fpweb.net/sharepoint-2013/migrate-sharepoint-2003-to-sharepoint-2013/
    I don't like that it doesn't indicate anything about pricing on the page so you have to call a sales rep and give away all your contact information before you can get a quote.  I probably will not call them.
    We would "like" to speed up the migration process and have only a single outage, but since the SharePoint environment is small, we will not be spending thousands of dollars just to save having to do two upgrades.  We would probably end up just
    going to 2010 and canceling the 2013 upgrade if needed.

  • How can I use Drupal as a third party CMS with ATG E-Commerce Application?

    Hi Friends,
    We are planning to use a third party Freeware Content Management System (CMS) for web site content in ATG E-Commerce Application, instead of ATG content Administration or merchandising.
    Can anybody please let me know how can I use a third party CMS(Eg: Drupal) with ATG E-Commerce Application?
    Regards,
    Krishna.

    I did create a rule to determine if anyone coming through time eval is a new hire based on vacation elig. date in IT0041.  It compares Today to the vacation elig. date and if they match, set a time type indicator to 1.  I also added another decision to determine if they were a part time employee and pro-rate their quota entitlement based on what's in their IT0007 weekly working hours.  Instead of setting the time type indicator to 1, I recalculated based on a percentage of 40 hrs/wk and then updated the time type to that percentage.  In my quota generation rule I use that time type as a multiplication factor to recalculate their new pro-rated amount rounded up to the nearest whole number.

  • How do I disable auto-launch of third party applications (i.e. TeamViewer)  at startup?

    I've loaded a few third party applications like TeamViewer which installed themselves as startup applications which I cannot disable in the system preferences login items.  The obvious answer is don't load these apps but that being said, how do I disable them now that they are loaded without uninstalling to prevent them from launching automatically during startup.  I can quit them after they launch but I'd like to prevent them from auto-starting during startup.  Any insight would be appreciated.

    Look in TeamViewers preferences for this:
    Uncheck it.

  • WLC 5508 - EAP-TLS - Windows 8.1 Third Party PKI

    Hello,
    Does anybody know what could prevent a Windows 8/8.1 system to connect to a WLC via EAP-TLS? Windows 7/XP do not have any problems here.The radius server accepts the request, but WIndows 8 still tries to authenticate.
    Software is updated to 7.6.120.0, I tried to setup timeout values, but no success at all.
    Did anyone have similar problems with Windows 8/81?
    *Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_7: Jun 24 12:43:10.604: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 Starting key exchange to mobile 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17, data packets will be dropped
    *Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_7: Jun 24 12:43:10.604: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 Sending EAPOL-Key Message to mobile 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17
       state INITPMK (message 1), replay counter 00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00
    *Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_7: Jun 24 12:43:10.604: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 Sending EAPOL-Key Message to mobile 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17
       state INITPMK (message 1), replay counter 00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00
    *Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_7: Jun 24 12:43:10.604: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 Reusing allocated memory for  EAP Pkt for retransmission to mobile 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17
    *Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_7: Jun 24 12:43:10.604: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 mscb->apfMsLwappLradNhMac = 00:24:97:52:87:d6 mscb->apfMsLradSlotId = 0 mscb->apfMsLradJumbo = 0 mscb->apfMsintIfNum = 13
    *Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_7: Jun 24 12:43:10.604: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17  mscb->apfMsBssid = 00:24:97:70:9a:00 mscb->apfMsAddress = 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 mscb->apfMsApVapId = 1
    *Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_7: Jun 24 12:43:10.604: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17  dot1xcb->snapOrg = 00 00 00 dot1xcb->eapolWepBit = 0 mscb->apfMsLwappLradVlanId =
    0 mscb->apfMsLwappMwarInet.ipv4.addr = -1407817979
    *Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_7: Jun 24 12:43:10.604: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17  mscb->apfMsLwappMwarPort = 5246 mscb->apfMsLwappLradInet.ipv4.addr = -1407817773 mscb->apfMsLwappLradPort = 10367
    *Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_7: Jun 24 12:43:10.604: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 Entering Backend Auth Success state (id=6) for mobile 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17
    *Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_7: Jun 24 12:43:10.604: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 Received Auth Success while in Authenticating state for mobile 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17
    *Dot1x_NW_MsgTask_7: Jun 24 12:43:10.604: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 dot1x - moving mobile 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 into Authenticated state
    *osapiBsnTimer: Jun 24 12:43:13.801: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 802.1x 'timeoutEvt' Timer expired for station 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 and for message = M2
    *dot1xMsgTask: Jun 24 12:43:13.801: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 Retransmit 1 of EAPOL-Key M1 (length 121) for mobile 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17
    *dot1xMsgTask: Jun 24 12:43:13.802: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 mscb->apfMsLwappLradNhMac = 00:24:97:52:87:d6 mscb->apfMsLradSlotId = 0 mscb->apfMsLradJumbo = 0 mscb->apfMsintIfNum = 13
    *dot1xMsgTask: Jun 24 12:43:13.802: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17  mscb->apfMsBssid = 00:24:97:70:9a:00 mscb->apfMsAddress = 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 mscb->apfMsApVapId = 1
    *dot1xMsgTask: Jun 24 12:43:13.802: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17  dot1xcb->snapOrg = 00 00 00 dot1xcb->eapolWepBit = 0 mscb->apfMsLwappLradVlanId = 0 mscb->apfMsLwappMwarInet.ipv4.addr = -1407817979
    *dot1xMsgTask: Jun 24 12:43:13.802: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17  mscb->apfMsLwappMwarPort = 5246 mscb->apfMsLwappLradInet.ipv4.addr = -1407817773 mscb->apfMsLwappLradPort = 10367
    *osapiBsnTimer: Jun 24 12:43:16.801: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 802.1x 'timeoutEvt' Timer expired for station 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 and for message = M2
    *dot1xMsgTask: Jun 24 12:43:16.802: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 Retransmit 2 of EAPOL-Key M1 (length 121) for mobile 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17
    *dot1xMsgTask: Jun 24 12:43:16.802: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 mscb->apfMsLwappLradNhMac = 00:24:97:52:87:d6 mscb->apfMsLradSlotId = 0 mscb->apfMsLradJumbo = 0 mscb->apfMsintIfNum = 13
    *dot1xMsgTask: Jun 24 12:43:16.802: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17  mscb->apfMsBssid = 00:24:97:70:9a:00 mscb->apfMsAddress = 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 mscb->apfMsApVapId = 1
    *dot1xMsgTask: Jun 24 12:43:16.802: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17  dot1xcb->snapOrg = 00 00 00 dot1xcb->eapolWepBit = 0 mscb->apfMsLwappLradVlanId = 0 mscb->apfMsLwappMwarInet.ipv4.addr = -1407817979
    *dot1xMsgTask: Jun 24 12:43:16.802: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17  mscb->apfMsLwappMwarPort = 5246 mscb->apfMsLwappLradInet.ipv4.addr = -1407817773 mscb->apfMsLwappLradPort = 10367
    *osapiBsnTimer: Jun 24 12:43:19.801: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 802.1x 'timeoutEvt' Timer expired for station 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 and for message = M2
    *dot1xMsgTask: Jun 24 12:43:19.801: 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17 Retransmit failure for EAPOL-Key M1 to mobile 0c:8b:fd:eb:16:17, retransmit count 3, mscb deauth count 0
    Any hint would be great .... Thank you...

    Hello Dino,
      thanks very much for your reply.
      The client uses a machine-certificate, the PKI is not a microsoft one, but a third party PKI.   The certificate is fresh and valid, the root-cert is installed and checked to be validated against it for the login.
    Clock is correct too. The same setup works flawlessly in Windows 7 and XP.
    EKU is set on the certificate (1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.2)
    I suspect the cert-setup itself, but don't get a clue where this might stuck...
    Björn

  • Third Party Sales Order in COPA - adjusted cost

    We have a third party sales order which creates the Preq and then the pruchase order. We have statistical conditions on the purchase order. We have switched the billing relavency on the item category TAS to a B to allow billing before the invoice recipt from the oversees vendor. Billing block is on the order until inbound delivery is updated.
    A purchase order is created with statistical conditions for an accrual amount (palletization charge). When the goods receipt is performed against an inbound delivery and  the billing block is removed, a customer invoice is created and the correct value, cost plus the accrual amount, posts into the customer billing document vprs condition and posts accordingly to co-pa.
    The issue is that when the invoice receipt is performed against the purchase order, the normal FI document is created against the vendor and gr/ir account. However, at this time an adjustment to the vprs is posted against the original billing document vprs condition for the statistical condition on the purchase order. This adjustment to the vprs condition then creates a copa document which reduces the cost of goods sold value field.
    Any ideas on how to prevent this adjustment to the co-pa cogs value?

    Hi,
    Process
    VA01 - Create sales order (Schedule line CS and item category TAS) >> ME52N - PR is generated after save of sales order >> ME21N - Convert PR in to P.O >> Then vendor will send goods to customer and will send invoice to our company >> MIRO - Invoice receipt from vendor >> VF01 - Final invoice to customer
    When you enter vendor invoice then you come to know that vendor sent qty. same will be billed to customer(Billing relevance in item category should be F)
    Kapil

  • How can I have SAP to identify third party new hires as a new employee?

    Hello,
    Situation:
    Our company has changed our vacation quota policy for new hires.  In 2011, new hires did not receive any vacation their first year.  In 2012, that policy has changed to give them vacation based on how many months are left in the year.  Example:
    If hired Jan 1 - June 30 = 80 hrs, July 1 - Oct 31 = 40 hrs, Nov = 24 hrs, Dec = 0 hrs.  I have configured the Rules for Generating Absence Quotas to make this happen, however we've discovered a slight problem.
    If a new hire has never been in our system, the logic works perfectly, however, in the case of third party employees, they are already in the system, thus have a Actions infotype with their third party onboarding hire date. At this point they are defined as employee group = 3.  After 90 days, we hire them as a production employee, employee group = P, so now they are now a company employee.  When they process through the generation rules, the system does not recognize they are a new hire employee because it uses their Actions entry date based on their third party onboarding entry.
    Question:
    When determining seniority, I'd like the system to use their third pary new hire action and not the third party onboarding action. Does anyone have a solution or suggestion?

    I did create a rule to determine if anyone coming through time eval is a new hire based on vacation elig. date in IT0041.  It compares Today to the vacation elig. date and if they match, set a time type indicator to 1.  I also added another decision to determine if they were a part time employee and pro-rate their quota entitlement based on what's in their IT0007 weekly working hours.  Instead of setting the time type indicator to 1, I recalculated based on a percentage of 40 hrs/wk and then updated the time type to that percentage.  In my quota generation rule I use that time type as a multiplication factor to recalculate their new pro-rated amount rounded up to the nearest whole number.

  • Third Party Order close if some quantity undeliver to Customer by vendor

    Dear Friends
    In third Party Sales Process How to close the sales order
    1. Customer Place Order = 10 pc
    2. Purchase Order created = 10 Pc
    3. Vendor Deliver the goods to customer = 8 Pc
    and MIGO and MIRO done on 8 Pc and Vendor unable to deliver remaining Quantity to Customer.
    That time business want to close the sales order. Then how we close the sales order and convert into 8 pc. By this it will not show that 2pc of that  item is open.
    Please give me detail of it
    Thanking you
    Arun

    Hello Arun,
    there is a very good FAQ-note how to change the quantity in a third-party-process, the note number is 550192 (here one extract):
    Question: I want to decrease the quantity for a third-party or     
    individual purchase order item that has already been ordered. What 
    do I have to consider?                                                                               
    Answer: If you decrease the quantity in the sales order, the system
    issues a warning message that this item was already ordered, but the
    system does not prevent the change. However, you should consider   
    that the original quantity has already been ordered and that you   
    must therefore maintain the purchase order system-conforming. There
    is no automatic function here except for the ALE scenario because  
    the maintenance is connected to an activity because you generally  
    have to inform your vendor on this change in quantity. This subject
    is also explained in Note 210942.                                  
    Here the relevant extract from note 210942:
    The updated order quantity is only transferred to the purchase order if 
    the 'ALE relevant' or as of Release 4.6B 'Create purchase order         
    automatically' flag (Transaction VOV7, field TVAP-ALEKZ) is activated in
    the item category.                                                                               
    If this flag is deactivated in the item category, the system does not   
    carry out an automatic adjustment of the purchase order quantity to the 
    order quantity. The purchase order must be maintained manually.The      
    quantities confirmed in the purchase order are automatically transferred
    to the schedule line of the third-party order or the individual purchase
    order.                                                                  
    Best regards,
    Joerg

  • ISync Palm Conduit with third party conduits?

    Although we use the iSync Palm conduit to sync our Address Book data to our Palm devices, we use Meeting Maker as our calendar application. This has been fine under Panther...we would turn off calendar syncing in the iSync conduit and the respective data would synchronize properly. But under Tiger, the Palm conduit installed by iSync checks to see if there are third party conduits installed and if so, insists on disabling them. We can manually move the Meeting Maker conduits back into the Conduits directory, but anytime iSync is opened, it gives an alert that conflicting conduits need to be moved. This is most frustrating, especially considering that the whole process ran perfectly under Panther. Is there any fix or hack that can prevent the problem under iSync in Tiger?

    Actually, there is a simple fix. Although this step was not necessary under Mac OS X releases prior to Mac OS X 10.4, you now must uncheck the Calendar option in iSync, quit the program, then toss this iSync preference file:
    com.apple.isync.plist
    You will find that file here:
    Macintosh HD:Users:<username>:Library:Preferences
    When you next launch iSync, that preference file will be recreated, but you will now be able to synchronize your contact data with the Address Book using iSync and your calendaring data with Meeting Maker.

  • IDCS3 WinXP SP2 - Third Party Plug-in from CS2 to CS3

    I've upgraded to CS3 with no problems - except for trouble with a third party plug-in. We installed SBREFX.pln, a cross reference plug-in, in our CS2. While many of our CS2 documents don't actually use this plug-in, it was installed when those documents were created.
    When opening these docs in CS3, an error message appears stating that the plug-in is not found. (There is no CS3 version of this plug-in, not do we really need it anymore.) While we can bypass the error message, we cannot "package" the CS3 publication for service provider as long as the plug-in is not installed.
    The only work-around we've found is to start a new doc in CS3, load the para styles, swatches, master pages, etc from the old CS2 file and copy and paste all the pages from CS2 version to new CS3 doc. VERY time consuming.
    We've also tried opening the document in CS2 and managing the plug-ins. But we cannot find a way to turn off, or disable, this cross reference plug-in in CS2. Our thought was to be able to disable it, save the CS2 file, then open that with CS3, hopefully with no plug-in errors.
    I appreciate any help anyone can provide.
    DH

    Bob,
    Could Dawne have solved this by inx round tripping in CS2 and then opening the new cleansed CS2 file in CS3?
    As I understand it, the fix works because inx does not support the plug-in references. So it should work as well in CS2. Is that correct?
    Thanks,
    Al

  • ERROR: An error occurred during the installation of assembly component / ERROR: Third party payload installer Adobe_Lightroom_x64.msi failed with exit code: 1603

    During the Installation of LR I get an error message. Initially I didn't have enough space for the installation on the start partition drive. However, now, it should be sufficient and I re-booted the computer a couple of time, hence I would assume that the temporary installation files have been deleted.
    Now, nevertheless each time I try to re-install the software I get the following messages:
    ERROR: An error occurred during the installation of assembly component {6435B7C0-E0C8-3EA2-91AE-7640034EAFCE}. HRESULT: 0x80070002.
    ERROR: Install MSI payload failed with error: 1603 - Schwerwiegender Fehler bei der Installation.
    MSI Error message: An error occurred during the installation of assembly component {6435B7C0-E0C8-3EA2-91AE-7640034EAFCE}. HRESULT: 0x80070002.
    ERROR: Third party payload installer Adobe_Lightroom_x64.msi failed with exit code: 1603
    Since PS was installed without problems I would refrain from deinstalling the Creative Cloud and start over again.
    Any hints?
    Thx

    Claasd5335054 you will want to review the MSI log files to determine what error message is preventing the installation from completing.
    ERROR: An error occurred during the installation of assembly component {6435B7C0-E0C8-3EA2-91AE-7640034EAFCE}. HRESULT: 0x80070002.
    ERROR: Install MSI payload failed with error: 1603 - Schwerwiegender Fehler bei der Installation.
    MSI Error message: An error occurred during the installation of assembly component {6435B7C0-E0C8-3EA2-91AE-7640034EAFCE}. HRESULT: 0x80070002.
    ERROR: Third party payload installer Adobe_Lightroom_x64.msi failed with exit code: 1603
    This is the only error information contained within Adobe Lightroom 5's installation log.  The MSI log files contain the additional error messages.

Maybe you are looking for